Member Info for CHELSEA7

SCAP have increased their market size to 25k, along with CNKS and CFEP, all three currently in order 5.9p and 6p on the ask. Still holding that ask at 5.9p, might we see a few more buys like yesterday to justify that. Lets see.

Buys 49k

Sells 20k

Can now sell 60k at 5.5p

Thanks DA. I didn"t catch what WINS were willing to take yesterday, only taking 1000 now at 5.504.

I missed the opening, are the two trades at 5.57 buys or sells. I presume buys, just wondering why we can only sell 1000 shares at 5.504, especially after yesterday??

I will make allowances that you struggle to understand.

Science is full of uncertainty, and the problem i have with your posts is they are not balanced, just highlighting negatives on the basis that anything can happen. That is undoubtedly true, anything can happen, but why omit the positives?? They are very clear, so i find your posts unbalanced as i do your comments to me increasingly often.

Aimbig, do you now have your licence to give others financial advice???

I am very sure the vast majority of us have been averaging/trading down for some considerable time, you are not inventing the wheel, but doing your best to resurrect fears, which at this moment there are too many unknowns to speak of such uncertaintainty.

Rather than discuss others, you are LTH, veteran of both BBS, in different disguises, how are you averaging down?

Yeah, another little clear out this morning, welcome to see. The main issue to me at the moment is the IND and obviously getting that trial started. As far as I know we haven"t been given any further insight into where we are in the approval process. I haven"t mailed CH purely because i can"t imagine there is much he can say presuming we are still waiting for it to be granted.

The focus here has been based on funding fears, for something we have been told we are funded until 2020 on. Obviously that grant and trial beginning will have a big part in deciding future funding issues, and still leaves us 8 months of this year to finalise our needs for 2020. Which given our two most recent additions to the team could well change that landscape considerably. Of course we have the BioNTech collaboration and the Karolinska one that can also make a huge impact on 2020 needs.

I believe this is an exciting period, with the pipeline being developed, the only downside for this BB is so much is unknown, particularly on the first issue, the IND, and it makes conversations regarding funding all the more difficult at this stage, if not premature anyway.

You are very right about the battles which are ongoing, if you recall it was two months ago since i refused treatment for reasons the oncology team agreed with, and we decided to meet again in two months time. Time passes quickly and that meeting with a few oncologists will take place on Monday. There has been considerable deteriation since the last appointment so am ready for treatment but not one that leaves lasting side effects, i have had my fill of that.

Side effects, quality of life, extented life, funny enough all issues that attracted me here to begin with, when i was clear, I am for ever grateful for this share in so many respects. It has enpowered me to ask the right questions over five years in treatment, which obviously gains there respect amd the best solutions can result. Will let you guys now the outcome, seeing it all from the inside is often so at odds with what we discuss, the hospitals work with what they have, their time often doesn"t allow them to research too far into what is following behind, but they are aware, and certainly are aware of Scancell since having me, lol. Catch yer later.

Val Ju, still making comments of paid derampers, and what has actually changed.

As you will recally with all the abuse i called each placing amd missed just once price since last year, and i said to you a few times i had a feeling the wild card would be a deal (of sorts) with Valiseek, which would keep you all quite, provide enough material for more ludicrous ramps and has changed the atmosphere to one where another placing would be welcomed given the scramble to buy Valirax.

Important giving the most ludicrous ramps the SP is still .60/.65, the market hasn"t exactly been set alight by the biotech deal of the year. Time has been bought though and even you have delayed any action you were thinking off, which IMHO had no basis. Now you return to the BB as the voice of VAL, despite your record of calling so much wring, i wish you all luck in that.

Thanks mathsprof. Yeah i was asleep all day. I just presumed it was a sell. Been surprised myself at how the ask has been holding up. GL to yer.

Evening dutch. Long time no hear, hope you are good. That is the most important thing. As to the share, well i was never one to predict anywhere near £4, have been very consistent in that as Ruck might confirm.

A lot of things have been achieved the last four years, timelines have changed significantly for whatever reason, my only regret was buying my first 50k at around £15k, On the flip side holding 220k now at a cost of £31k. Lets hope above all we get to see that early promise in human trials repeated Take care of yourself.

Evening mathsprof, how do you make it that?? There were no trades on NEX, and 3 buys on LSE, 228K, 19K and 44k, totalling from memory 291k from a volume of 392k. Hence 291k buys and 2101k sells.

Am I missing something?

Buys 291k

Sells 101k

If anybody saw red earlier today, WINS had come off both bid and ask and had returned at same price 5.50/6 before the close.

So with respect whether it be DCF, NVP or LBW again we are holding nicely, the 5.40 sell occurring when WINS were off the book.

A 228K trade from 16.21 at 5.65 showing as a sell. Looks like a buy to me.

Thanks Aimbig, I did, as ever, learn to read. DYOR

Share Chat Today...........Today's Hot Chat TopicsBushveld Minera… (BMN)198Scancell Holdin… (SCLP)133Sound Energy (SOU)129Pantheon Res (PANR)124Lloyds (LLOY)91

Once again we are in the top three, interest there, now we need news,

Actually never come across a poster who just makes it up knowingly, and gets it wrong every time. But the problem remains post it anyway and it sticks with some. ..........................heart and minds eh!!

Night you guys, lets see the charm offensive tomorrow.

Hard to believe it is only 9 weeks since she joined Scancell, feels like much longer.

http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=SCLP&ArticleCode=lqqc85hq&ArticleHeadline=Appoints_Heads_of_Research_and_Manufacturing

Along with Alan Parry our new Head of Manufacturing, both are very impressive additions to a ""cash starved small Biotech"", struggling to pay to keep the lights on!!!

It is very clear what they have been employed to do, what is more interesting is what attracted them to us and under whose instructions Scancell have acted upon to join us in developing the company further. It was those appointments that prompted me to buy another 120k, lol, albeit in the 7s). Yes we are valued as a small Biotech, but those appointments speak volimes about our potential and hopefully will be subject to further news in the short term which could well indicate future funding plans.

Well TBH the conversation has moved on since Tommys (Aimbig) post to me this morning, and thanks to a few for your kind comments. Torquay Fan why am I not surprised at your comments??

I decided after Tommys post this morning just to rest and eight hours on have just woken up, deciding that was better for me than answering stupid questions. I think like a few here that after 7 years , i could put a name to the vast majority of posts in that time, so no apologies from me Tommy for ignoring your very condescending post. For however long you have been a poster here, there or under whatever guise if you have never seen me have an opinion about anything then better you start to read the posts that are posted rather than for the umpteenth time lately showing us how condescending you are.

Yes happy you guys had moved on to the opportunities we just might currently have, as we are set up now, and how those relationships alone could remove what has been an elephant in the room for far too long. Whilst forming my opinions based on that, I and I guess everybody here are fully aware of risk, what might not happen, what could go wrong, but most importantly use any information we share or research to decide on our trading stratagy. Amongst the ludicrous claims that are made of being against any post which does not mirror my own thoughts, well lets just leave it there, a BB without differing views is dangerous as any of us who have been around for years will know. We only have to look at MTFB and IMM to see what can occur, and that is just two that spring to mind.

Amongst the elephants in this room most notably IMHO are why we were ever valued at 64p, and the very frustrating one being that we are so hard to value, and that being just on the information we know. For those seeking blame for our M/Cap there are many avenues to explore, avenues we are not even aware of, let alone what we are. At the end of the day only we can only decide whether the share looks undervalued compared to what we know could arrive news wise at any particular time.

Above all I was pleased to see inanaco, Ruck and Ray debating, the only shame for me is the tenuous relationship between Ruck and Inanaco. Three posters who i respect greatly, and value their input very much. Perhaps the tenuous relationship adds just a little to the entertainment at times.

So Tommy, all you have to do is read the BB to garner who thinks what, it is very simple, doesn"t need condescending posts, demeaning others or trying to close the conversation to fit your agenda. My guess is we have spent a lifetime closing in our business lives to last a lifetime, and don"t underestimate the different skill sets we all have ,rather use them to the BBs advantage. The disagreements will long continue when the BB is polarised between the Science and short term trading stratagies.Saddens me to see a poster apologise for having a sense of humour whilst warding off the venomous posts which have been our problem.

Tommy, our posts crossed. Are you always so patronising?? Have a good day

And that Ruck is the reality, keeping our senses of humour going under very personal baseless attacks is exhaustive and very testing.

As i was trying to post last night, no serious debate can occur when baseless attacks are underway. It is a better option to ignore those who wish to make false allegations, create funding crisises, and then debate can be very usefull for all. Would assist ADMIN also if the constant cries of liar, cease, very soon bans will be handed out, but the problem is only made worse when it is not the science being debated at all, but a misleading game played by traders to create divisions and destroy any chance of sensible debate. All very pointless, and we are left with a paralised BB where even humour doesn"t have a home. I didn"t post all of last week as it was venemous, returned only to be accused of the same false allegations, which ADMIN removed them all, again, and the very next day the very same posts reappeared. Unfortunately very little is about Scancell now, and anything we should be proud of, post it and wait for the abuse to flow. yuk.