Member Info for CHELSEA7

Morning All, was it ever a contentious issue that Scancell kept control of the data. Not in my mind, it is their data and the more we have discussed it would it even be legally binding that a patient could not share their personal experiences to anyone they choose.

It is paramount that a cancer patient and/or loved ones can talk abut their feelings

So, there are just 3 trading weeks left until Xmas, from the information we have there is a great chance of news in that time, here"s to an outstanding close to the year

TF......"Scouse it must be you that's suffering from 'wild speculation and panic' and confusion - to me it seems like the BB has been quietly looking at what's going on. That's all."""

How you can say "quietly" is beyond me!!! There was nothing quiet about last Sunday when as ever you incited and prolonged a big disagreement again with myself and AB. Every post you have to agree or disagree with and decide what is right or wrong, but you never add your own opinion to any discussion. Between you and another there were 30 odd posts, I posted twice all day, until late in the evening, the same subject matter using my name and the 5 who recced me. What you couldn"t do was update that to the 24 who recced my post. It was noticed by all that the whole contrived thread was removed by Admin first thing in the morning. That is not quiet debating.

There have been many great posts on the subject for a while now. Like anybody else there is nothing more I would love than to receive a blockbuster RNS updating us to the early potential of Moditope. I just feel Scancell will not issue one on the basis of one patient. Over the years we have discussed so many times the merits of stories about new wonder cancer drugs involving 2/3 patients and it just didn"t see credible. I hope I am wrong and we have more data to share with credibility .

#Again just my opinion the ridiculous demeaning posts directed at a few as to whether they are here for the science or money was as a distraction posted all day. Surely the two go together, if the patients are not showing remarkable signs of recovery then talk of £8 or £12 are pointless. Todays posts again are interesting as to our expectations and hopes, which is why I am just trying to contain my excitement as to what could be.

TF, after all these years I look forward to your opinion not you being judge and jury to every post posted. Is that a lot to ask for?

As ever really looking forward to next week, and after a week where we saw a retrace which IMHO was hardly not expected I felt Friday was really interesting. We opened .60 down and on the lowest volume all week we finished plus 3.33%.

Just hoping that will continue to next week and we meet these targets whether they be 30p, 36p or more, and as important to achieving the targets we have to pray that the patients respond, lives are saved and the war against cancer one day can be won. Surely that is what matters TF, not building little armies to rec you.

Have a good weekend all.

I haven"t seen it lofas, but it is about the trial patient allegedly. I would rather concentrate on what we do know from Scancell, plenty good enough.

Oh dear indeed, is there any point in constantly referring to Patient x or whoever WW is. As it happens last week I wasn"t aware another "patient" had been asking questions, but surely discussing who is genuine or not is just a personal opinion, at this stage impossible to prove and therefore pointless.

It only IMHO takes away from the many RNSs we have received in the past few weeks. I was just surprised and very disappointed that the news had very little impact on the share price, and it made me feel what do we need to get some blue days apart from the obvious firm data. Even the commercial deal, from memory fizzled out quickly, mainly due IMHO to ot actually knowing how much the deal comprised off.

But moving on from McMillans BB we have heard about partial response and recruitment at last is coming our way, which is a direct result of oncologists discussing Scancell and Moditope. Recruitment has been difficult for us and so many other sall bios as it is the oncogist who recommends a suitable trial to a specific patient and as word gets out about issues like partial response news like in most things moves fast among the industry, removes large elements of risk, no oncologist wants there name associated with a trial that takes lives quicker than they save them.#

I just feel we have more to discuss than that BB and the general concensus here for a long time has been our Market Cap bears scant regard to where we are now. With that in mind and a few RNSs that have "grown on me" who is to say that the best part of our doubling in share price is a matter of re rate, I am hardly a disciple of Zak Mir but he and there are many amongst us still feel after doubling we have a long way north to go and there are many avenues of news which could easily propel us to achieve that.

As ever time only will tell, but I am pretty sure with the quality of posters here that what we are seeing and being told in RNSs is of great interest, exciting, bodes well for our future rather than the constant debating of who is genuine, or not, on a BB we had never really heard of until very recently.

Have a good weekend all

31 Trades

23/23.5 +3.33%

Best of luck Flakey with your top up FWIW I too think we will have good news before ears end.

Just wanted to add to my 10.52, and where I thought violindog was hitting on, that I have had no experience of being a trial patient. My experiences are based only on dangerous levels of radiation, which takes many months to see conclusive results, and also which we believe is why I am here today on cryoblation treatments which also take over 6 months to see conclusive results as the area, in this case the lung suffers high levels of bruising. Until that settles down no scans can detect whether the tumour has been destroyed.

It is entirely IMHO that those patients who are deemed appropiate for surgery and chemotherapy and immunotherapy treatments will be told exactly what the most recent scans reveal immediately, simply because the mental well being of the patient is so important in fighting the treatment and the situation they are in.

I think we all realise the importance of Scancell having conclusive evidence from at least a handful of patients before releasing such price sensitive news.

But we do know what partial response means. Again purely IMHO such an observation will travel like wildfire through the Oncology industry, and it is very possible that is the reason why recruitment has been stepped up as indeed so will dosages. I still don"t understand what we need to do to gain Breakthrough Therapy status and perhaps anybody who knows better can add to that.To this day I am sograteful for the treatment given to me for 9 years. I know deep inside that had I not have been transferred from The Royal Free where I was diagnosed , to UCLH I wouldn"t be here now. That is no slight on The Royal Free but the treatments available at the UCLH are possibly only equalled in this country as ther new unit/building for Immunotherapy suggests.

corr) Sorry, the oncologist would give you a heads up if applicable but had to wait for verification from a radiologist

Violindog, 100% correct, we would have the scan and see the oncologist a couple of hours later IF we could get an appointment to do so. It was bad practice though for a radioligist to mention any scan results and even after seeing your oncologist they would just add that it has to be seen by a radiologist for confirmation and all the measurements and density that they do.

In the last 3 years at UCLH the governing body stopped the oncologists from booking scans prior to our appointment. The mindset behind that was infathomable.

1) For patients where mobility and pain were big issues we had to duplicate long journies, which by the time transport arrived, necessary queues a day would take up 10 hours, often waiting for hours to get home.

2)But the biggest issue (Scanxiety) was every month you were terrified what the next scan read and then you had to wait 2 weeks for the results, and again the following week another scan. It was like a rollercoaster and I met so many people who survived very traumatised by it all.

I pray nobody has to go through that.

Bermudashorts, after one of the worst days here on Sunday which was so unnecessary it was seized upon my 11.03 and 5 recs. I posted once more before 12 and never posted under that link all day nor any link. It was TF as ever who stirred AB into denying he was anybody else. His denial according to TF was the end of the matter, the baiting continued all that didn"t change was the heading C7 AND 5 OTHERS which by then was supported by 25 others.

I remember and I am sure you do that many decent posters took to social media to condemn the offensive posts, I remember Paul 97, yourself and cars who were disgusted so my question to you was and is why did you or anybody else not confirm what I claimed to have happened as the truth?

Constantly being accused of a lying ramper sticks in some quarters, well my lifespan will be very short and all funds I have put into Scancell will be left by will to North London Hospice who did so much for me and was where my brother passed a couple of years back. So for me a percentage will help me battle a few things privately the rest given to the most worthwhile charity I have ever come across, I wonder if that will stop the abuse, the vile abuse that only scousemark had the decency to confirm. I thank you scousemark.

Hasiba, I must have missed in the weeks gone by any posts made by you which have seemed to upset so many here. The truth is I have been very unwell and sleep for nigh on 18 hours a day.

I found there were many times you were right, I rea your posts and make up my mind which I can relate to.

I have long believed Bermuda to be amongst a couple of others our best posters here but I was very surprised by his post today and it is very unlike him to sound as he did today.

I wish you the best and look forward to hear your opinions, then it is for me to work out if I agree with you. As it stands you seem to be another piced out for abuse because of what you believe. Is that balance or abuse? I have my feelings.

Another 500k plus that look very much sales, almost certainly from Calculas adding to 2 days this week of 1.5m sales.

Forgive the lack of exact data but since the Holdings RNS A few weeks ago where Calculas had reduced their holding by 8m it is my opinion another Holdings RNS will come very shortly.

So we have doubled the SP from 12.5p in a short time to 25p had a 10% retrace and those Buyers will still be active IMHO.

Nothing unusual there.

Goodnight guys, until tomorrow.

The link page seems to have been archived. It would have been iterestig to have seen the answer.

Anyone know?

Obviously that does not include people who have years of experience in the Cancer world. They meet and talk to more people face to face than any cancer sufferer.

For the sake of allowing you to pick at my exact wordings I will leave it there with you. You might well yourself of had some dreadful experience with a cancer sufferer but your constant picking at any word I utter are designed IMHO to disrupt this BB.

To this effect, for the sake of this BB I will just filter you and Torquay Fan. I find your posts insulting to anybodies decency and intelligence.

I don"t think it is for anybody, mainly non sufferers to decide what is best for a cancer sufferer.

I think the overwhelming majority of us have seen and are aware of the horrors of cancer, and I do believe it builds peoples resolve to do something about it, much in the manner that Scancell are. Whether the interest is financial or both it helps support what a company like Scancell are trying to achieve.

Sounds so simple miavoce, and the correct thing to do, but for cancer patients at any stage it closes off a life line, which is being able to discuss your greatest fears. The old addage there is always somebody worse off has never been more correct and forming little manageable groups is very common

lofas, morning, well the degree surely is partial response (30%) min............................GL

sorry about that,

WTP, as you probably know Biontech released an RNS regarding that this morning at 6.30

There are a couple here who might choose to answer that mornington. I have always avoided that talk, which doesn"t mean it can"t happen

Thank you bladey. Yes I have been watching that on Sky News this morning. They reckon it slows dow the condition by 25% in the early years. The treatment as it stands IMHO will take simlar timelines to patients who are having chemotherapy. It is a big start though.

I don"t know of anyone who has a holding here just because it is about cancer, and I don"t think anyone has claimed to. Money will always be the driving force behind any investment. How good if both come true, patients and profit. Here though as part of the abuse decent people have been subjected too has been with that in mind, being smeared with being evangelical amongst other things. Best of luck to you and everyone.