Like said: Tree shake works both ways. Its more often that PIs are washed out during an upspike.
Whoever sold 0.70 might be paying 0.90p soon.
Sell low, buy back higher. Easy peasy life of PI.
And now that a large number of disappointed LTHs have been washed out 0.70ish (Jeffrey), the Sp is 0.80p again and ready for its rise to 1.60p.
Careful if you try to spin a wheel that is too large :))
O/t: Begger, if they don't fall back down to 0.50 and not even 0.60, and if they manage to hold a decent 0.70ish, then these days are the preparations for the next upleg. Actually you can say that the quick share spike was a treeshake that flushed out droves of LTHs who were spinning a a wheel far too big and for too long with their investment.
In this case please accept my apology, ccsx. And sorry for p4spoor foreign English that cause a few misunderstandings.
O/t: In my opinion people with a front-runner image as well as leading people of society (company directors / stakeholders / medical doctors / scientists / politicians ) should take up the challenge and carry the burden that comes with their status. Or they should handover the role to someone else. Not everyone will accept that burden. Not everyone would like to be in public focus like that. Sorry for the essay. Ignore it if you like.
IMO leading managers (or politicians) should be absolutely impeccable. Especially those who are already rich. Decades ago I read an interview with Richard Branson where he stated "I want to show that you don't need to be a big a7hole to have success in business world."
I fail to understand how (super rich) politicians accept free gifts, free holidays or "extra money" from the company, such as the Nissan CEO. Its leaving me speechless. When is it enough? Well then, in the end, everyone pays a certain price, one way or another. Each to their own!
Uppsala! Suddenly the market is raising the ask again: Ask: 8.70
Yes, its best to keep the focus on the stock company. Everyone please excuse my off topic replies to leading stakeholders in disguise. No offense meant, Myles!! And hats off to you that you managed to build such a large stake as a private investor. Well done! (I still don't agree that our new broker should have come in here through a personal recommendation, but this is for other people to decide.)
Sorry ccsx if I have to ignore you for a while. What insuls are you talking about???
And what simple question do you mean? AIMs postings from Monday are gone, while you state they are there.
Bye, ccsx, and best of luck with your investment!
Haha, hilarious, so its 0.69p again! If they retrace to 0.33, then I'm back to start.
Never mind, like said, someday, if necessary, I can donate my 1M shares to Christian, so he can buy food. No probs!
ccsx, a bit contrarian, are we?
AIM_chaos / McNultys posts on Monday have been removed.
------
"...did enjoy you bleating on about your conspiracy theories over the summer concerning Nigel and "financial allies", and me getting the company to sign up my ex-employer as its adviser." AIM_chaos
Just so ridiculous, for someone who popped up here in March, stating that 30-35p is an urgent buy.
Totally unethical for an insider (and financial ally for this company) to come up at 14p and handout hold through paroles... while the Sp was due to a technical correction.
RE: Aceh Senator requests permit review21 Nov 2018 10:56
...is this why there was a hidden seller, starting from April this year?
This individual placed about 50 x 100-150k sells, starting from 14, 11, 10 and 9p.
IMO company mngt, with decades in Indonesia, should have forseen this legal challenge ("...with ancient cultural sites").
Will be intetesting to see how JP Morgan 8% stakeholder will react.
Will be interesting to see how Berenberg will comment on this subject and the trading outlook for ARS.
In my opinion Berenberg has been called in to prepare a takeover by multinationals.
Isnt it astonishing that company insiders instantly appeard on here with a long list of hold through paroles, when this was 14 and 13p?
Now we are 9p.
(No offense meant, Myles!)
I'm a bit surprized that people wonder where a company insider / large stakeholder could be gone.
One report to LSE, and they will ask to clarify the status of an unknown alien.
(Haha, imagine Nigel posting here everyday with us, disclosing informatiins? Unthinkable!! Unethical!!)
The agreements of this site require that McNulty is not allowed to post under a fake ID on a public bb.
He was asked to apply for a veryfied account. Also on Twitter AIMchaos could be reported if he does not publish his real identity, being a professional / instututional investor.
(Anyone in EUA this morning?)