Member Info for CarefreeCarry

Isn't it strange that a company that has performed exploratory work would announce the results of that work? No? Just Aim thinks that then?

Can anyone show the RNS that states that Nativo built the road that was washed away and is therefore responsible for the reconstruction of the former road? No? Thought so.

Probably covered by :-

"• Completion of accommodation facilities for all personnel

• Restoration of water distribution lines for domestic use and sanitary facilities"

As I pointed out the other day, the first two drill holes will still have provided data to the company.

Bonkers - The 22 words that I posted had 1 point to it and you missed it completely.

There were numerous posters pointing out to Stebo that they expected a spike and retrace after the bank debt sign-off and Stebo argued with all off them.

The point? Lots of people expected a spike and retrace.

Bonkers - Conveniently ignoring the debate that Stebo had with numerous posters here about the expected spike and retrace upon bank debt sign-off.

Queue the demands to know exactly when Dupax drilling resumes because the word "expected" isn't acceptable to some posters 🤷

Stringy - Funding and equity priced in. I'm currently £335k up with my 46.8m shares. What, in your opinion, am I doing wrong?

AI was wrong then.

It doesn't go away. It just squats here, on the KEFI board, warning that KOD crashed (because commodity crashed 80%), so KEFI will follow suit.

It doesn't squat on other gold boards warning that the sky will fall.

So why KEFI? Why this one board? The doomsday scenario is applicable to all other mining companies but Bonkers persists on squatting/existing (without any relevance) on this board. Why?

It's not like we'll get an answer anyway because there is no logical reason for it other than mental illness.

Why not squat on other gold companies boards warning folks of an SP crash if gold prices plummet by 80% like KOD's SP crashed?

Why are you squatting here, only on KEFI, specifically?

Bonkers - Why is the SP no longer ar 0.45p? Because progress has been made which values the company higher.

Why is the SP not 5p? Because not enough progress has been made to value the company at that level.

As business milestones are reached, the SP will inevitably move higher. Unless, of course, you don't believe that the SP will follow the similar path of other exploration companies that progress to producing mines.

Rome wasn't built in a day and neither is a mine.

One more question, why are you still posting on a company's board that you are no longer invested in?

I believe that a streaming only option would not require shareholder approval.

TrueRed - The licenses are issued on time. The issue is that the license application process takes six years to complete.

Major4legs - The "wider market" tars all AIM companies with the same brush. The "wider market" avoids the AIM due to the volatility of the micro/small cap companies, the immaturity of most AIM companies and the perceived gambler mentality of the majority of AIM investors/gamblers.

To paraphrase SurreyNot123, "invest in the fundamentals". The La India fundamentals will ensure that MTL will produce an awful lot of profit for the 12+ years of the project life of the mine.

CF - You'd rather not price in Dupax yet but you are putting a price on dividends that the BoD are not considering until 2028 🤷

The IP results confirmed that the first two drill holes were drilled off the main mineralised structure.

It doesn't say they were blank.

Either way the two holes will still provide data. We can only speculate on what the data is.

Don't worry, I'm sure someone will be claiming that the Chairman let everyone know beforehand 🤷😂😂

The first gold pour CVRs will be settled by issue of loan notes with a maturity of six months and one day after their dare of issue.

Exploration CVRs will by settled by either new MTL shares or unsecured Loan Notes or a combination thereof, at MTL's sole election.

Optrade - Possibly PI's taking their 300% in profits from the 0.44p days.

Wouldn't you?

You'd have to have been invested in the first place, obviously.

He seems to have trouble with numbers.

Finance RNS dated 3rd Nov.

X post dated 5th Nov (2 days later)

X post claims spoke to Chairman yesterday (i.e. 4th Nov)

AIM claims heads up from Chairman in advance yet it was the day after (yes after) the Finance RNS.