Change of strategy required11 Jul 2023 09:11
IMO FUM have got this wrong in a number of ways. Firstly, pricing strategy is way off. They’ve tried to align it with the likes of Viagra and Cialis, which when introduced were novel treatments. However, the price point for their generic equivalents is now as low as £1 per dose, so Eroxon is way out of step. Furthermore, when you look at the ingredients, you don’t need degree in chemistry to understand these are common base ingredients used in a multitude of skin care and hygiene products, so it feels overpriced. The problem with the high price tag is that it raises expectations to an unreasonably high level and amplifies the dissatisfaction feeling when you don’t get the response you hoped for. Hence so many negative reviews.
It’s stated that the efficacy improves with further use, but the problem with this is that the initial response and dose price has already set a seed of failure in the minds of users - just another ‘miracle cure’ con. I think Eroxon, as a novel treatment, can carry a small premium, but £2 per dose would achieve greater acceptance and willingness to persevere.
Secondly, packaging. In order to justify the price tag and presumably give the product some kind of upmarket medical feel, it’s presented in tiny individual dose tubes. This makes it a cumbersome and fiddly process to apply the product in you moment of passion and all spontaneity is lost. IMO, it should be presented in a high quality, premium feel, multi dose pump action dispenser. Something that can be kept bedside and ready to go and encourage users to slap it on. As there’s no active drug, there’s no issue with overdosing.