RE: Value the markets9 May 2019 11:05
I agree with Lottohopes’ logic. The suspension is frustrating but I’ve consoled myself with the hope it will al be worth it and like Lotto, I don’t think this is unjustified optimism.
In addition to his analysis, it just does not feel as if these Directors intend running a life style AIM outfit of promises, placements in an ever repeating cycle.
Ten years ago when I was naive and trusting, I invested in two AIM mining companies whose Directors were full of promises.
I gave up and sold both after more than a year of nothing, happening apart from more empty promises in useless RNSs. Is that better than the silence of PERE, which may actually be for a good reason?
Today (I just checked) both their share prices are much the same. But the Directors have made a very good living at PI’s expense... for 10 years or more!
PERE’s Annual Report simply does not feel like that.
As Lotto mentions, they have made acquisitions so clearly they are not doing nothing.
Isn't is also significant that their intention to trade on the main market for listed securities of London Stock Exchange?
Why do that if you intend running a sham lifestyle company? Far better to be on AIM with less scrutiny, less onerous reporting requirements and less cost.
Like okenia I ended up here after following PJ into what was China Africa Resources but decided to tick with it when it all changed. I still hope that proves rewarding!
It is very frustrating but I do wish everyone here will all find investing in PERE proves to be a profitable decision - eventually. GLA Brycen.