We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
I think that your only hope is that they do a puff & dump on it. I've seen it before on these shell companies. Rumours of amazing things to happen. you'd be amazed how people will buy just because of fomo. the puffers will be selling what they can before the reality sets in & they dump. Just a thought ...you never know you might get lucky. stranger things have happened !
Maybe Gavin Mayhew top slicing :-)
Or there aren't any decent bids. Which explains why they are on the lows. Who would buy stock right now ? I would rather pay up on good news then take a punt now without knowing what's round the corner. As you say. need a an update from the company. Until then who knows.
Best of luck. Hope it works out well for everyone
Roger , that was a post from Twink earlier in the year. Take what people on hear say with a Shovel of salt !!
Where do you think the stock came from if it wasn't a seller ??? There are two sides to every trade. The fact it was done in the middle indicates it wasn't stock offered by a market maker.. But yes a buyer took the stock off the seller.
Probably best to understand the basics of trading if you're going to analyse daily prints.
As for the rest . Good luck. You have made predictions in the pats Twink . Hopefully for Rogers sake you get one right.
Roger when the Metrotile order is announced and it comes in anywhere near 200,000 euros you will be able to sell at far more than 1.5p. Add news of a small pilot order from the MOU in Thailand and we will be cooking with gas. 2 financial years ago this company had a turnover of less than £30,000 . An increase of around 15 fold in 2 years is not bad going. "from tiny acorns do giant oak trees grow"
Roger when the Metrotile order is announced and it comes in anywhere near 200,000 euros you will be able to sell at far more than 1.5p. Add news of a small pilot order from the MOU in Thailand and we will be cooking with gas. 2 financial years ago this company had a turnover of less than £30,000 . An increase of around 15 fold in 2 years is not bad going. "from tiny acorns do giant oak trees grow"
Any idea what the RSP looks like ? I assume no bids & the big seller around a little higher up. Could be some margin calls from some spread bet punters. Either way there appear to be no buyers in town. That tells you everything you need to know right now sadly. Best of luck.
Maybe the client wanted a lesser amount, but to get them at the discounted price had to buy more than they actually wanted. That would explain why they are reducing.
Would verdi have agreed to such a discount for only £250k for instance. I doubt PH advised the client. Just acting on behalf of. Bottom line is we don't know what the actual intentions of this investor are . With AIM stocks it's often a case of smoke & mirrors. Good luck to you.
It will be for a one of their private clients.
Firstly, sorry for your losses. secondly i'm only here out of curiosity as a friend of mine holds this & asked my view.
I don't really have one other than I don't trust the management and not a great shareholder list . I just wondered what people on here were saying. it sadly hasn't changed much since my last visit many moons ago.
Roger. Just one thing I wanted to point out. Before this placing I had heard a rumour that a well known investor / PM
had been shorting them. I don't know if there was a borrow available or sold short for a forward settlement date. yes that is possible through the right broker ! But if it's true it could be this savvy shorter then buying them back on this raise.
We will only find out when they announce who it was. He could be net long now & is just flipping out the balance.
Just me putting two & two together but a possibility. Good luck getting out above avg price.
BTW, this is an order driven stock. No market makers. Without doubt there has been a large seller around for at least the last 2 weeks. I hope that when he completes the order these things should pop. But for now he keeps leaning on them.
Vectura (Vec.L, Buy, TP 220p) - small negative y'day afternoon Vectura announced that partner Novartis has signed a licensing agreement with Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc for the US commercial rights to its 3 COPD treatments Utibron, Seebri, and Arcapta. Recall that Novartis partners Vectura on these products ex-US (already approved and selling well) and we were waiting to hear whether Novartis was going to launch these products in the US. Today we have found out that the related LABA/LAMA trial Novartis was running for Utibron against a competitor product did not meet its primary endpoint (ie the head to head study versus GSK's Anoro did not meet non-inferiority) and that Novartis has chosen to out-licence the products rather than launch them themselves. Our base case has c9p of value per share in for commercial launch of these products in the US (based on a 50% probability of launch). Now that the head to head study has read out negatively and Novartis has chosen to out licensed in the US rather than commercialise the products themselves, it is likely that some of that 9p upside is less likely. However given that we now know the products will launch in the US (albeit likely as a smaller commercial opportunity), we see it sensible to carry value in our base case. We await further detail from Sunovion on the launch plan, before adjusting the value in our base case.
master rsi your barking up the wrong tree Lad. but your right i'm wasting my time on this site thats full of wanna be warren buffets. Good luck Lad .
book can be realised in full, Net tangible Assets were £11 million. There are no earnings, not even bullshit earnings (EBITDA) to speak of. Sorry Chris but this is bonkers. When the new media bubble bursts I would not want to be long of Concha if you are going to spunk your cash in this way.
dewsbury. apologies for the delay. i've been away. the article by the the sheriff ! share price back down again..oh dear. this is a fairly old article…but…i agree with him….ends in tears i fear Concha (CHA) has finally done a deal. Chris Akers can call me an old fart who does not understand the world of new media and he may well be right but what he has done appears insane. Concha has paid £4 million for a 0.43% stake in Ve Interactive Ltd a new media "unicorn" This is not new cash for new shares but shares bought from the founders. The price paid per share (£250) is the same as the last funding round so Concha can claim its decision is validated by VCs. Ve is described as a "multi-award winning global technology company offering a suite of apps across a single platform which drives website traffic and reduces abandonment at each stage of the customer journey on the site, including at the landing, browse, basket, check-out and post-purchase stage. This is done through display advertising, targeted overlays and email. Ve services over 10,000 clients worldwide and tracks more than £100m worth of transactions a minute via its comprehensive data-set which provides valuable insights into customer activity. Each of its apps are driven to deliver highly-targeted content to customers based on their purchasing activity and profile." Whatever. It soundly like gobbledygook. So how profitable is it? Sadly we are only told about calendar 2014 results which Ve finally got around to filing on 10 January 2016. There is no sign of 2015 numbers. But for what it is worth: Sales were £19.662 million however you will note in the accounts HERE that prepayments and accruals were £9.5 million. It is no doubt a very interesting revenue recognition policy. Having paid directors £733,000 the pre-tax loss was £2.87 million and the operating cashburn was a stonking £17.9 million helped by a massive increase in debtors from £4.2 million to £17.9 million. Hmmmm loads of acruals and debtors through the roof why and where dos that ring a bell? At the year end cash was £914,000 debtors were £17.883 million ( see above) and creditors were £8.948 million. Among those who were owed cash were the directors £2.4 million) although we are told that they were all paid via a VC funding in September 2015. The related party transactions ( note 19) are pretty enjoyable. It strikes me that this is effectively cost capitalisation of development expenditure but so many related party deals? I dont like it. I must be a boring old fart. Of course 2015 must have seen growth. But it also needs to have seen serious funding injected given the cashburn. But rthe valuation is just insane, surely? Akers is valuing Ve (depite all the red flags on late filings, accruals/debtors, related party deals etc) at c£1 billion. that is 50 times 2014 sales. If one believes the debtor
first off, well done dews bury. concha did go up in september as he predicted. no news that i am aware of but volume picked up and the shares went up. as for this article on ve it seems pretty low grade pie in the sky. personally i would be inclined to back tom winnifrith who is of the opinion that concha have wasted their money. once again well done dews bury . blind squirrels & all that :-)
dewbury, don't forget. your'e only as good as your last trade. Sing when your winning . Just because you have been so terribly wrong doesn't mean to say you won't laugh loudest. You never know, Alibaba might want to pay 6p for concha's 0.43% stake in Ve. actually that sounds too low maybe 20p !! In the meantime don't give up the day job. windows need cleaning :-)
what's your target price dew's Anybody who plays the stock market not as an insider is like a man buying cows in the moonlight. You an insider dew's ?