Member Info for Boser14

I feel that a lot of the VLRM shareholders get stick for not being honest. Some of you need to take your rose-tinted specs off and admit that things aren't right. Doubling down just makes you look silly. You'd get far more respect for admitting things aren't good. Obviously I'm hoping my investment turns good, but I am a realist...

PP1 you have put the most claims onto this board with no sources to back it up. As soon as you are called out for it you say everyone is "concentrating on the little things".. but these "little things" are what you're posting about. In the last 3 weeks you've been caught fabricating claims multiple times, not provided any proof & then you get defensive and attack other users. Your behaviour is bizarre. If anyone is putting investors off, it's you (along with the dodgy RNS's). You'd get a lot more respect if you posted your sources, but I'm guessing that you can't because they simple don't exist.

Cue the "you don't know what you're on about", "do some homework", "you're emotional" nonsense replies...

PP1, seeing as you love relying on AI slop, thought I'd have a check on it too, and here are the results. Interesting?

I checked the LSE Share Chat board for Valereum (VLRM.PL) today, focusing on posts from "Peoplepower1" on or around 19 April 2026.

The most recent relevant posts from Peoplepower1 in that timeframe continue the same pattern we've seen before. Here's a clear fact-check of the main claims he made:

1. Claims about Metrikus "audit hash / digital stamp" being updated and linked to the coupon

Verdict: False / No substance.

He repeats the assertion that a Metrikus audit hash or digital stamp was updated/stamped (previously claimed at 11:45pm on 29 March, with new variations). No public hash, timestamp, explorer link, or official company confirmation has ever been provided. The £600k investment in Metrikus (August 2025 RNS) was for AI/IoT smart-building technology — not for monitoring QGP notes, gold reserves, or coupon payments. No RNS or company statement links Metrikus to any audit of the coupon.

2. "Whale buying on OTCQB" or "US institution chatter" linked to the hash

Verdict: Unverified speculation.

OTCQB volume for VLRMF remains thin and unsolicited. No credible data or sources tie any buying to a Metrikus hash or "US institution chatter." This is hearsay without evidence.

3. "Injective blockchain from Metrikus" or regulatory monitoring (FCA/SEC/Nasdaq)

Verdict: False.

No public integration between Metrikus and Injective for VLRM/QGP assets. No mention in any RNS, investor call, or company material of Metrikus being used for regulatory verification or Nasdaq listing purposes.

4. "Assets are over-collateralised / investment grade" because of Metrikus

Verdict: Unverified.

The RNS describes the notes as asset-backed, but there is no independent audit, JORC report, or regulatory confirmation of over-collateralisation or investment-grade status. All claims remain company narrative without third-party proof.

Overall Assessment

Peoplepower1's posts on 19 April (and the surrounding days) contain no new verifiable substance. They are the same optimistic, technical-sounding speculation he has posted previously — taking the real £600k Metrikus investment and extrapolating it into a dramatic narrative about coupon verification, whale buying, and regulatory monitoring. None of it is backed by official RNSs, on-chain data, or company statements.

This is classic forum cope during a period of high uncertainty and frustration. It doesn't provide reliable information.

The real issues remain the same: the cash tranche is still only partially confirmed in small instalments, the Definitive Agreement is still pending, and trust continues to erode after repeated delays and restructurings.

You're right, that was out of order - sorry. I want this to do well as I'm invested in it, but I am not very confident about it at all right now, and I'm struggling to see where others confidence is coming from. The RNS's have all been wildly inaccurate so everything is hard to believe right now

Who verified them? Metrikus by any chance?

Crawshaw you don't know how metrikus works, the audit hash has been re-negotiated after it was timestamped, didn't you know?😂

The only thing I need to remind myself in future is..

Never, never, never engage with people who don't know to how to have a proper conversation without spouting nonsense.

Point proved PP1. Pleasure as always

PP1, your ability (or lack of) to have a civilised conversation is quite embarrassing. You deflect every single question that you are asked & then bizarrely attack people who question your wild, fictitious claims. I'm not sure if you are deluded or trolling on purpose, but I can't see how you're taking any positives from what has happened in the last few months.

I should have sold out at 20p.. been kicking myself every single day since. I've mentally written this off now. I'm sure pp1 will be along to tell us how good this news is though... maybe he can tell us exactly how much the part payment is, I'm sure he's seen it on metrikus

Coupon has been paid guys, just saw it stamped on metrikus. Panic over

You could provide credible evidence to loads of disbelievers on this board, but instead you choose to act like a petulant child & talk utter drivel. Pp1 is the only person in the world that's seen the metrikus blockchain payment & audit. Lucky guy

If I was such a big believer in VLRM & wanted to get the SP moving, I'd be shouting the proof from the rooftops... guessing you don't have the proof. Great argument pp1.. doing your investment proud

Like I said.. provide proof and I'll admit I was wrong.

It's not though is it? I've searched for it, as have many others. If you have the evidence then show it & I'll happily apologise for being wrong. I don't mind taking accountability if someone shows me hard facts that I was incorrect

Where's the proof of this audit? Writing it on a website isn't proof. We can't even trust what they write in an RNS, let alone a website someone knocked up in 10 minutes. Please tell me you're not using the website as evidence of the audit being real?

I can see why you post AI drivel so much - because when you speak without AI it's like talking to a child. Repetitive nonsense. Everyone else on this board knows it. Not one person is defending you or agreeing with what you're saying. Take some accountability and admit what you're posting is incorrect.

Well my average is 8p, so another thing you're wrong on pp1. Don't dwell on it though

Pp1: spouts some cr*p

Pp1 gets called out

Pp1: i don't know, don't dwell on what I've said.

You can't make it up. Well, Pp1 can but nobody else could

It's like talking to a child PP1. I'm not wasting anymore of my time. Just read what you type before posting - maybe then you'll see why people on here think you're deluded & clueless.