The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Actually, just doing a bit of research, my shareholding is with HL and they seem fairly accommodating in terms of facilitating perks: "Eligible shareholders are entitled to a Marston's Inns and Taverns Privilege card which entitles the holder to a 20% discount on food and accommodation at participating Marston's inns and taverns." There's a number to ring: http://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shareholder-perks
Didn't see the prog but, after many years of using Premier Inn, I noticed recently they seem to be taking an unduly hard line with customer complaints (anecdotally and personally). After a recent stay at same, no hot water for a shower in the morning and all I've been offered is a paltry �10 voucher (to share between two).
DT's Questor: realistic but, amidst an ocean of negativity, slightly encouraging article. Part extract below: This column rarely has a beef with firms that invest in their competitive position and accordingly it is inclined to stick with Sir Charles�s plan, especially as the damage to the share price and the dividend has already been done. Questor says: hold http://www.telegraph.co.uk/investing/shares/questormarket-leading-positions-low-debt-strong-growth-share/
A bit of idle speculation on my part but I wonder if one of the (content only) streaming service providers, such as Netflix or Amazon, would welcome a tie-up with Talk? ...with the aim of becoming a content/ISP service like Sky/BT/Virgin and gain control over their bandwidth requirements. Amazon and Netflix are huge (market cap $664Bn and $111Bn respectively) and could possibly take out BT but they might see Talk as more bite-sized with expansion opportunities (also with less of the debt, union and pension's baggage).
A no-holds barred commentary from the DT re Talk's Q3 update (could paste but would probably end up in breach of copyright, I think DT allows one or two free articles) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2018/02/08/talktalk-shares-tumble-profit-warning-200m-placing-fund-fibre/
Quite a lot of radical developments for what might normally be considered a humble Q3 update. Seems all about good, old fashioned, conservative management = slash the dividend + raise capital = reduce debt (we don't want another Carillon on our hands) Talk should be light and agile enough to take on lumbering behemoths like BT and Vodafone (with their unionisation, debt levels and pension liabilities), assuming the regulator ensures fair network access. Can anyone confirm, going forward, the dividend is likely to be: interim = 1p, final = 1.5p? ...until such time it is restored to 7.5p (hallelujah)
Something doesn't make sense with this share, there has been saturation negativity from the financial commentariat for months. ...but it is being relatively lightly shorted <2.7% (in BlackRock's case, their short position has been in place for a long time, last month it even unwound slightly): https://www.shorttracker.co.uk/company/GB00B4YCDF59/
RNS out this morning: http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-detail/ECK/13520810.html
A bit of a weird article in the Telegraph, Talk have now closed the problematic Indian call centre so the complaints relate to a situation that no longer exists. Also, Plusnet, EE and BT are all part of the same company, so not sure why the impression is given of different ownership.
Not fully au-fait with the background (newly acquired shareholding) but although the issue of MARS shares to buy CW would, on its own, have diluted the MARS yield, there must now be a profits contribution from CW. I suppose you would need to do a weighted yield analysis across MARS/CW to see if the immediate deal benefitted existing MARS shareholders or not? Presume there were some "synergy savings" on offer which may take time to materialise?
Gerry557, this is my fear in a way. Duplicitous Corbyn/McDonnell will ensure that the power companies will die the death of a thousand cuts by heavy handed regulation and windfall tax grabs before picking them up on the cheap. UK may not be Zimbabwe but if Corbyn gets his way we will be the next Venezuela (insane, left-wing, doctrine does not care what damage it does to the country/people). We are in unchartered waters, usually state intervention occurs when dealing with basket case companies (Railtrack, British Leyland, the UK coal industry, the old British Steel). Lord knows what will happen when dealing with perfectly healthy and well run companies. Most of the antipathy towards the UK power industry seems to stem from a handful of numb-nuts who either can't use on-line energy comparison sites (or don't have friends/relatives who can) or who just don't care but like to moan (or get other uninvolved people to moan on their behalf). All heavily championed by left-wing organisations like the BBC. People want to try living in countries with rubbish power systems, blackouts, rota-cuts, power-constrained growth and all the rest of it.
To buck things up a bit, I would like to see a dividend improvement or even the establishment of an interim dividend. Although full year results not out to June-time, so nothing likely to change re the dividend policy until then.
garam0, I too sold out recently with a similar � loss (ok, mitigated to some extent by the special and other dividends). I just felt that the risk of a dangerous, Marxist lead, Labour government, hanging around for the next 4 years (potentially), would be just too much of a distraction. This decision was not taken lightly as I worked for NG. for 26 years so have some considerable sentimental attachment (plus they are paying my pension). Moved my money into similar yielding companies without all the political baggage (DC., MARS and RDSB).
garam0, I too sold out recently with a similar � loss (ok, mitigated to some extent by the special and other dividends). I just felt that the risk of a dangerous, Marxist lead, Labour government, hanging around for the next 4 years (potentially), would be just too much of a distraction. This decision was not taken lightly as I worked for NG. for 26 years so have some considerable sentimental attachment (plus they are paying my pension). Moved my money into similar yielding companies without all the political baggage (DC., MARS and RDSB).
Done similar myself on the odd occasion. Although usually, a buy when I meant to do a sell and a sell when I meant to do a buy (even more unusually, the "mistake" worked out for the better). On-line dealing execution is effectively on a hair-trigger. Back to ECK, the good news flow does seem to have dried up for now (it has always required a constant drip feed of same to stop retraction). I'm amazed that ECK has gone on for so long without a take-over approach, although hopefully any future approach will be a higher base level than at present.
"Solid dividend payments, no competition and government already own 20% of this company anyway so the financial books must be on order." Where did you get that 20% figure from, FYI the UKGov own no NG stock?