Member Info for billy101203

Let’s also see what YE results are like.

As EMS sold so no drag on bottom line. Angra as of Sept 22 was making profit.

So expect YE to be positive minus any costs associated with FCA applications.

Or on the other hand with the world opening up more has Angra revenues increased.

We all knew about placing reason back in December. When we announced raise via CLN. Subsequently we raised half via CLN and cancelled it ( poor show and advice from last broker).

New broker raised the other half. $1.5m was always on the cards for 2023.

So stop spinning it as something else

I think we far more ahead in strategy then we led to believe

Sitting here on Main Street Disney fort he 4th July fireworks to start. We could do with Tan lighting some rockets on Twitter!

It’s not a loss until you have sold.

Fun and games let’s see what plays out. There’s time to give a share a kicking and a time to give it a lifting.

Rules are always the same. Just different players. They all want in.

Balls in BOD court! Could do with some PR. Unless they are playing things under the radar!

Re post 1011hrs

That’s a good post and take on it:

Grrrrr!

Re post 1158hrs

Well it from this post you seem to have a problem with the FCA now!

You’ve tried to put a hook out for every other conceivable angle and nothing has bitten.

Re post 2256hrs

Good post

Jiffy

Potential acquisition………weren’t we putting out adverts out for staff a few weeks back?

Re post:2205hrs

You know the big for banks will not want to loose ground on Crypto currency. The days of visa and Mastercard and their systems are gone.

I’m sitting in Orlando at the moment. Using my Chase Uk bamk card for transaction. Got pleNty of cash with us. Our currency cards are not worth it too many issues loading up etc. on top of this poor rates. Forget using credit cards as exchange. Rates are poor.

However using my Chase bank card we are only losing a nats coxk in exchange. If Chase bank can do it then other can. Even if we withdraw cash from ATM it’s cheaper than buying back in the Uk via John Lewis or FairFX.

My point being iif Chase can make it pay so can we just skimming a fraction on the top to 4 decimal places. Big banks don’t like this.

Re post 2049hrs

You can’t blame him for trying. Expect more until news.

I wouldn’t be surprised if we announce an acquisition and we moved 2 steps forward

M96

That’s my take on it.

We are already ahead of the game. The law has to catch up with innovation not the other way around

Re post 1846hrs

We may be a few months ahead already.

MassiveRay

What are you trying to imply?

Re post 1532hrs.

Well done Lloyd88 now you get it. Under 1st title “innovations pathway support”

Read the 1st paragraph and it echos what I posted Friday evening/ Saturday morning. Excellent post by you , good find and good research!!!!!

Re post 1636hrs

What’s your ratio behind this post?

Issue with Sandbox is time scale to slow (UK Plc being slow again as usual kick things down the road)

Below quote;

“Regulatory sandboxes typically operate on a small scale, meaning they may not be able to test the full potential of a FinTech innovation. Start-ups may face challenges in scaling their products and services beyond the sandbox, which may limit the sandbox's impact on the FinTech industry”

For what is worth I’m going with option 4.

We closer than what we thought. As we have already completed 6 months testing with our soft launch.

From RNS”

“. As an alternative the FCA have offered the Company a place on their Innovations Pathway programme, an initiative designed to support financial services firms in launching innovative products and services, ”

Surely FCA (case worker) would have known if application fitted and complied with FCA tight standards. As said case worker was advisor for interpreting FCA standards.

1) Now either FCA keep changing the rules or they are just not ready for new form of monetary change the other economies are bracing.

Or

2) Are our team (GST) offering said new innovative product that the FCA haven’t thought about or understood.

Or

3) “ firms in launching innovative products and services, ”

RNS suggests we are closer or are about to launch something!!!

4) We only to FCA Sandbox for protection when launching/ trying products out. Better done under the umbrella of the FCA to fit the i’s and cross the T’s.

RNS has left has now left more questions than answers. Feel we need Tan to do a podcast “Saying FCA Sandbox all well and good but too restrictive for what we are about to launch or are launching. We are further down the road than thought and are ready to go!!!