Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
How is assuming more shares derisking you muppet? It’s increasing the risk as you are throwing more capital at it and the reason for this is to bring my average down, so I can get out sooner rather than later.
Va111Jas- no one has been deramping mate, just stating facts and possible risks? So you think just because you have invested in a share you shouldn’t talk about the potential risks and setbacks that face it? And we should all preach 50p by Xmas despite no facts to support it just like you and your little gang of rampers? The fact of the matter is the rampers have been talking so much nonsense on here that they have alienated and annoyed holders that bought in way higher at the current prices, and want to see some return on their investment. But no according to you it’s ok to ramp the **** out of it for your own gain. Remember those that are ramping this are also the same ones exiting this share quietly through the back door, and trading it on the drops. So morally that seems right and acceptable to you? At least I keep my view fair and balanced, unlike those of you that have a hidden agenda.
AnotherLambo- and who are you some sort of forum police that’s poppped out of no where? Have had enough of the MATD board have we? Why don’t you take your ignorant self back there. I guess you won’t know about their next duster until April so you have to keep yourself occupied.
Good to see the usual name calling and insults taking place. Well recommeded place for the parents of bored school children to send their kids for entertainment. I honestly believe you'll make a killing from that as opposed to investing in shares.
No point posting on here until there is real news. Otherwise you’ll just end up reading fairytale crap from BBoffer, BigBench, T54, amongst others
Bigboffer- it’s better than talking crap like yourself and making stuff up. Like “this will be 50p by Xmas”
Haha you wish u ******
Can’t be arsed with the current bunch of losers on this board, which why myself and the other sensible ones stopped posting on here.
Laters muppets
Franco- because we all did t have a crystalline ball like yourself that told us the CEO was lying, and that the SP would be back down to 4p sooner rather than later.
That comment will **** off most of the LThs on here who are sitting on similar averages to myself.
Franco- I bought more to get my average down so I could cash my money out soo we rather than later. I bought in at 13.8p order finally which was far too high. I managed to improve this a little bit sitting on a loss nevertheless.
And where have I been deramping you muppet?
Jars- I have already gave you my figures as below based on information released from the company. I don’t need to tell porkies like you.
Once again you resort to your tactics of deflecting attention when you’re in he wrong. Rather than answer the question all you can say is I’m here to depress the SP to get a buy in? How pathetic.
For your information I have already bought more and not looking to buy any further here now.
Hepseal- I cant understand either and the entire post seems to be made up as I can’t find any RNS that would backup those figures.
Geowiz- gosh where have you been lol? Yes it’s only producing 51 bopd due to a height water cut rate. It never did produce anywhere near the claimed 700-1000 bopd during testing. This has been discussed extensively on here over the last few months, if you want to have a read.
James- your post still does not make sense and is still confusing. The reported stored oil in September was 9000 barrells and the well was producing 51 bopd not the 58 bopd you state. Therefore over the last 60 days I’d expect just over 3000barrells of oil added to this, taking the total to 12000. Please can you clarify how you are reaching those figures and where you get the bopd from?
James- where have you got the 16000 Boo for 16 from?
On the RNS dated 25th September it had produced 9000 Boo and was continuing to produce at at rate of 51 bopd? But by your calculations it’sbeen producing over 100 bopd ? Confused.com
Exmex- I didn’ say this was for certain but I said it was the likely sceamrio. Given there are 3 more wells to develop back to back, I don’t see the resource being available to revisit 16 until all 5 are complete. Unless of course there is a setback on one of the wells, which gives them a gap to revisit 16.
Bobby- but you should know by now a lack of news and clarity ALWAYS causes a share to drift it’s common sense.
I’m still intrigued why T54 thinks this should be trading at 8-9p right now.
Maladoni - so you rather have the fairy tales on this board? It’s nice saying this should be 9p or 15p, but no justification given by those who keep repeating this. Merely just pointing out what’s happening to Oiler’s at the minute like you’ve seen with I3 and ECo in the last couple of weeks, but the fools on here continue to ramp.
Why would this be treading at 8-9 when the first drill was a flop, and the results of the 2nd are unknown. The only think that has value here at present is the cash in the bank, which worth around 3p a share. The rest is a loss making company at present.
Anyone seen i3s share price today? It’s halved this week and just goes to show how hard the market punishes any little negative news.
Not invested in here but just adding my 2p here on an interesting subject. All these consultants get paid to big up a company or have a vested interest, so do not take what they say at face value.
Just a few months back he was pumping eco at 1.5-1.7 and had a target price of £3. Well you know what’s happened to that in the last week or so.