Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
Depends who's bottom drawer you pop it in :
https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/10969427.global-mine-owner-marry-chinese-tv-presenter-willington-church/
Where is he hiding . . . . .
Like to know under what jurisdiction a so called Company can pass a motion by a minority vote when existing shareholders have been disenfranchised - it is tantamount to fraud- imho
A Group Litigation is the only realistic way to pursue Broadley & if as has been reported (if true) he is domiciled in the UK then it makes the issue that much easier. There's been years of jaw jaw from his lackies, while dates have come & gone (surprise surprise) with nothing but contempt for shareholders. The Nominee structure is something that this excuse for a CEO seems to fear - I wonder why ?
macnai - what a load of BS !
"CIC Capital Fund Ltd is dorment. In the current environment, CIC Fund risk profile is too high. A recent shareholders meeting voted in favor to dissolve the company at some future date."
WHAT VOTE ?
Broadley emailed me a few years back suggesting that I revert to yourself - why I wonder ?
Again WHAT VOTE ?
Not ONE of the Nominees that I hold with were advised of a vote much less invited to participate in.
"The timing will be when the shareholders whom received dividend share in CIC Capital Ltd receive a share value greater than that when invested in CIC Fund (3.7 UK pence)"
"CIC Capital Ltd held a recent shareholders meeting. Shareholders approved CIC Capital listing at a time there were a) tradable share and b) cash of value GBP15 Million."
Complete ****** & you know it ! Shame on you.
& I doubt there's many that would take Broadley's word for it either.
Without wishing to be rude in any way whatsoever, I'm quite frankly staggered at the level of naivety in so far as there being any level of trust in this so called CEO . . . . . imho Bromley effectively did a runner ages ago. All he has to do is keep fobbing shareholders off.
To say that something isn't right would be comical. There's nothing right about this situation & hasn't been for years since delisting. Shareholders time would imho be better spent tracking him down & issuing a petition of proceedings against him & the Company. Just my tuppence worth but that's more than the shares.
With zero accountability & no consequences (thus far) for his actions & with shareholders funds out of reach - what do you think ?
An update ? Guffaw . . . . . what use would that be ?
You'd believe a single word that came from that excuse for a CEO ?
A postcard from Disneyland would at least be honest, take a bit of effort & be worth twice as much as any update.
To echo the post that was pulled "this all means" f**k all . . . . more hot air . Nothing personal mrJimV but why would someone have admin pull a post that most here will have more than a bit of sympathy with.
It's not even Jam tomorrow as tomorrow never comes.
I suspect a postcard is more likely
Yep - merely to delay investors seeking redress in whatever form that may be.
More Broadley's level : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIv12pLu_zQ
JoeYangtze - with respect I don't need to hear from Broadley - it's the Nominees that administer the holdings that I have in this so called company that deal with corporate actions etc. that need to hear from him.
As for " I can confirm that the listing process is going well." - yet more comedy Gold
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZLXhEoBTHc
Loster - do engage brain. As a long term (enforced) long suffering shareholder of this joke of a company what "agenda" could I possibly have ?
Not one deadline has been met - not even close. Nominees on two platforms that I have these shares held with, have NOT heard anything from CICC/Broadley for years ! It's not me with the agenda.
So let me get this right. Folks holding out in the hope that this shambles of a company will one day re-list, with one missed deadline after another are now handing over their share certificates to SB to look after them.
You couldn't write the script.
More comedy Gold (not the CICC variety) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n78XENu6QdA
or conversely - the sooner SB pulls his effin finger out the sooner said 'doomers' will have less to be so unhappy about ?!
You'll have to forgive the scepticism but with 'paperwork' still outstanding - does it not make a mockery of all the previous dates for a supposed listing ? Not only that but for a company to supposedly specialize in listing other Co's, it doesn't really bode well. Happy to be proven wrong but seems SB is either playing such a long game in the hope that most if not all shareholders will peg it first or he will - or hasn't got a scooby either way he's off the hook.
It follows that the SP should be correspondingly higher to reflect the ratio of the consolidation ! The question is (should a listing ever take place) whether the SP is higher or lower than that corresponding price.
thanks macnai - appreciated. Neither Hargreaves Lansdowne or Jarvis have any knowledge of this . I will go back to them tomorrow & ask them to check & then get in touch with the necessary official body/authorities.
Does anyone have a link to the official consolidation corporate action ?