RE: Candy/Bonnier...21 Sep 2024 12:51
Well spotted, Rifkin! If nothing else works, just go back to the original deramps.
“Bonnier between Aaqua (703k), his missus (599k) and Eliot & Luther 150k so that's 1,452,000” - As per Zak's prior deramps, it has been indicated that AB's stock price has been subject to manipulation by Bonnier, who has been engaging in short selling activities for the past two years. Additionally, Zak has mentioned that Bonnier has been a forced seller due to ongoing legal proceedings, resulting in forced selling that is hindering AB's potential for a market rally. It is worth noting, however, Zak is now saying Bonnier still maintains ownership of 1.4 million shares Lmao hahah. Zak has fabricated a multitude of falsehoods to the extent that he has lost track of the veracity of his statements.
“Candy doesn't want Boom to rally coz he wants to ruin Bonnier and wants his Boom off him as cheap as possible.”
It appears that Zak is representing candy in his statements. If Zak was appointed by Candy to consistently deramp AB in order to prevent it from rallying then..
If there is any validity to Zak's assertion about candy, it elucidates the reason why all individuals except candy and Steven Smith have refrained from buying shares. Nonetheless, each person implicated in the manipulation of AB will be held accountable without a doubt. In today's technological era, no one is immune or untouchable.