We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Quite agree - feel much the same - your dosing point is well made, reminds of the technology argument between VHS and Betamax - pushing for uber high tech standards when just good enough - is well, good enough. Could easily miss out by trying to polish rocks!!
Tant pis, in for the longer run now ;)
16FEB RNS on Shre Incentive scheme ...
"Following Admission, the Company's enlarged issued share capital will be 288,215,722. "
Also seen 26.8m additional shares but also seen issueing up to 27,520,485 shares, so a tad confused myself. Seems like 20% diultion is bet figure to reckon on.
I am at my limit for investing so will not take up offer, and just figure this is now monopoly money investing until a buy out comes, in which case these fluctuations will just be noise in the machine!!
@ JRDC - with you 100%
Seems the science is still good ... but it is now ell beyond the lab rats running the show - need a serious business person to start running the show.
Maybe that was the starting point for Simon Bennett, pity this 'first intervention' appears to be this shambles.
Intersting post I read on another feed that application for FDA approval may have had some influence on this knee jerk fund raise.
Opennness and transparency would go a long way to AVCT acting with business maturity. I'd like to know who runs the Ethics Department ... if there is one ... if not ... ONE IS NEEDED, along with a new CEO!!
If they are obviously attacking - why are people selling at these ridiculous prices?
Begs the question ... why sell @ 81p just because there is no news when last news was pretty good really?
I need seriously educating ;)
Absolutely right - what a dog - who would want to buy into a share that has no support following a heavily hyped Science Day. The only thing the SD changed was increasing the head winds for the get rich quick monkeys. So what is science for any way? And who needs it? Certainly not the monkeys! Science requires faith, and there is no faith in the UK ... the police lie, politicians lie, bankers lie, why shouldn't scientists lie too ... But if that is not true there is always the NASDAQ
With you Mustang, I have worked for a variety of multinational and smaller companies, and who gets the top job is often nothing to do with being the best at being a CEO. Luck, right place-right time, small-minded politics, they all play their part. AS strikes me a well focused and well-up on the programme of technology and when you get a better sense of his drivers, you get a better sense of why his communications often fails to hit the mark for non-techies. But a genuine and capable CEO I believe him to be. What he/Avacta would benefit from is getting a Comms dept better than that FTI Consulting bunch, who strike me as well out of their depth!!
I'm with you WAGroot,
I am naturally a LTI, so I am sorry, I just do not get that someone would invest in a Pharma in Phase 1 trials and expect the 10 Bagger overnight. Then on what is good news, ends up selling on a fluctuating dip to 146. Do your research ffs. Ah, just beats me every time. But then again I have an attention span greater than the average gnat that seems to be prevalent from, dare I say, younger souls these days. Apologies for the generalisation, but that's the picture I am getting, so I just hope us LTIs have got this right ... and your timeline sounds right to me.
One 'unknown trade' this morning way below market price boundaries at 36, decent size compared to everything else traded today which was pretty low volume = bad trading day, down 10.5%, and a hefty 70% on the year.
No comms to seemingly trigger that ... is this just more of a death spiral or does anyone see any signs of hope?
Good point Wiggly, which reminds me of ye olde addage ...
'Tell them what you are going to tell them; Tell them; and Tell them what you have told them' ...
Sometimes they still don't even get it after that, but Hey-Ho, hopefully sufficient will and that's for everyone's benefit
Onwards and Upwards