Member Info for balancedviewer

Donek. i'm still dubious about getting all the parts on time,or at all subject to good luck straight from the horses mouth.

Oktane, I think we,re on the same wavelength,recommend.

Only a plonker would pay 1p when they are cheaper on the open market.

It's not like putting the house up as security. If the field flows as expected that's great, but if not we will be bankrupt because of the guarantee. At present Balcombe, Lidsey And Brockham are liabilities until they produce and prove their value.

I will wait to see what anyone else has to say.

Noticed only 2 answers conveniently printed, seems to have missed the3rd mentioning Angus will pay up if it goes pear shaped. mmmm.

Parts subject to availability and good fortune. = If get them and trusting to look? Saltfleetby Energy only putting their 49% security to help cover share of the loan.= Angus are the obligor = guarantor for the loan if the field doesn't produce as expected, they come knocking at our door for the £12m. Summary= we need the loan to pay for parts which with good luck may receive, and if it doesn't go plan we will have the bailiffs calling. Sounds all good to me.

Where is carry on regardless, gone very quiet i see. Maybe just maybe the penny might have dropped.

Yanis. I do apologise, I didn't realise the BOD have done a better job than I thought. Does any premier clubs out there want a manager to guarantee relegation to the conference league in 5 years, If so please contact Angus Energy plc.

gp hasn't he done well, do you agree where i'm coming from though.

Sorry Tenure

Regards to the barrow boys etc. The SP was 4p when GL took over his so called Tenue with a proper BOD, since then the SP has plummeted to all time lows. How the BOD dare to ask for options at 1.5p is the most arrogant thing iv'e ever seen. I suggest GL prove the 4p value of Saltfleetby and get options at 4p where he started. Doing this would give him resect, and he would gain financially after Lidsey and the Geothermal projects are proved. He obviously reads the poster comments after mentioning the frustration of shareholders to malcy. So George if your reading this, prove us all wrong and show your moral side. P.S. If you was a football manager you would be long gone by now.

gk regards to the assets, better not check the NAV it might make some cry.

Re sacking BOD i noticed James's comments yesterday 8am and 6pm are mentioning the AAAG for spin,and then calling the BOD misleading on every front.I have to laugh at the hypocrisy having filtered me.

Speaking of JTP, is he the one getting the 8 projects that GL would want on the go at the same time. My guess he's been told to hide in the undergrowth until it's safe to reappear.

If JTP goes GL will fall down without the strings holding him up, could we see that word requisition again like honky vonky.

Regarding sacking fat cats on the BOD, who would you suggest.

Ocelot. I think if a company wants to be taken seriously it has to stick to the timescales stipulated. If you apply for a mortgage the bank wants to know they will get their money back in 25 years or before. If i was lending money, i would be thinking the lender estimated 2.5m and now it's 12m because of the gross failure to correctly estimate in the first place. You go to a bank with a business plan and stick to it within reason, any less the lender sees big red flags.

Let's get this funding out of the way before talking about any more, one step at a time is my motto.

Croc. as mentioned taking a step back i fully agree. I once said to Ocelot in the nicest way, IF YOU DON'T LOOK BOTH WAYS YOU MIGHT GET HIT WITH A TRUCK.