RE: ECR3 Jun 2026 09:05
Talking Sense ... First of all I notice that you haven't answered my two questions. You accused me of 2 things .... being invested here , and saying Whitlow was CURRENTLY part of the management team .Both allegations are false . Right ....As regards your current question....When have I seen you ramping Ecr ? Is that really a serious question ? Almost every single one of your posts is an Ecr ramp .Can you not see that ? Perhaps our interpretation of a ramp is different? Here's mine .A ramp is when someone promotes a company by laying out all of their potential so people believe what they read and then buy in .Only to find that the ramping doesn't actually come to anything and the share price and the company performs quite woefully .Which is a carbon copy of what has happened here .Its a bit like trying to get the Saudi Arabians to buy some sand .That's my view as I see it .And thats what you have been doing for many years now .Promoting a company who don't actually achieve anything .It's always next week , next month , next year .But in terms of solid results and company valuation and success , next week , next month and next year ( looking at what's been achieved here , never actually comes .And for proof of that simply have a look at this company and your " ramping " for the last 5 to 7 years ? Or how long you have been here .Nothing has ever come to fruition despite the incessant ramping .Not just you , but from others too .Many seem to have left once they know that nothing is going to happen .But you seem to want to stay the course . If something was ever achieved here then the ramping woukd be justified. But looking at this company and this CURRENT part time management team ,not to mention a 95 % drop in valuation over a good many years it's a bit of a joke really isn't it ? And the sp , day by day , year by year , and this company's evident lack of complete failure and heavy dilution over a sustained period , quite clearly backs the above facts up . I hope that answers your question ? You can't keep promoting something that constantly fails .And if someone dares challenge these facts they get abuse .So they give it back , then are called out for abuse ? 😄 .Its like throwing a stone at someone , then when they throw one back , accusing them of throwing stones . The whole debacle here , and the money raised and spent , and still nothing to show over a quarter of a century is , to be fair , a ridiculous state of affairs .And that's why your constant "ramping " doesn't work .There's no substance to ever back it up !
Sign In
Follow the stocks
