Member Info for ArthurDogal

Asher, yes, that is correct and at no point have I said they didn’t buy it for cash.

Billy, you are doing it again, I’m fully aware of what I posted,

So I’ll ask it again, and please reply without another questions

What I have posted that is libel?

Billy,

What are you on about back tracking? You’re another one who answers questions with another question.

I haven’t back tracked at all, I’ve just explained to you what I meant by my comment and to BFD, and I’ll say it again,

I feel the placing was done to replenish the cash used to buy bake.

That isn’t libel. You keep banging on about enough rope but that’s an utterly inane comment.

Typo - I meant , it was so much nicer when you were on “holiday”

Also back to the point you are clogging up the board with utter tripe like normal.

Massive, it was so much nicer then you were on “holiday”

I’m really upset you keep calling me unemployed when I’m not, I’ll have to report you as that’s just not fair.

Billy,

To replenish the funds they used to buy bake.

Much like if you for example buy something from your savings, then at a later date place money back into said savings account.

That isn’t libel

BFD, what on earth have I said that is libel?

I believe they have been clever in regards to when they have done the placing.

Did they buy them with cash - yes

Do I believe they did placing after purchase to replenish said cash funds - yes ,

Have they gone against what was said in the RNS - I highly doubt it

What part of that is libel?

BFD,

Come on this is childish, reported me for what exactly?

BFD,

Well, not in a way us it, it’s swings and roundabouts, just using different cash isn’t it.

Swervington, I’ve said many times that long term this has massive upsides, but that could be said for any time over the last 4 years.

Short term, as in since Jan, this has been absolutely butchered by the BOD and silence since really.

I still maintain the placing was done to pay for bake, as if it was done before buying bake the SP would have been at a horrific level.

Kat, I think they must take it in turns on their super ramping.

Christ, this board was better when massive was on “holiday”

What absolute drivel they write.

Nero, the problem with your post is, you could have posted that every day for the last 4 years.

BFD,

Better start calling zag a price anchor,

Amazing how so many people have the same view bar the ramper mafia on here who are disappearing.

Also, nowhere did massive say he was going on holiday.

The problem is Aim, it’s about how the market reacts and at the moment it isn’t positive towards GST.

You mention

Sement - no news for months now on how this is happening, doesn’t look like any application has gone in yet. Closing in on over 3 months since last announcement.

Integration - not finished yet and we’re not sure what the benefits are yet

Acquisitions - plenty in the pipeline but again no actual news.

The only thing we have at the moment would be the integration so hopefully that is completed within the next two weeks as per the last RNS and a positive RNS needs to be out too.

Keep the faith guys, can’t be long now and then we will be having the super RNS.

Clearly sold up hasn’t he

Come on Aim,

So everything there is still unknown and your ok as you have so much profit so far.

Swerv, if you are talking about my reply to Nero, then I would be in regards to trading yes, as Nero was speaking in the past tense about trying to trade the share.

Nero,

The problem is, the people who have been trading it for years have clearly made more actual paper money than LTH of 4 years.