Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPO. Watch the video here.
Just reading between the lines regards the extents of the NPF contact....."Importantly, the central structural corridor that hosts MOD’s copper discoveries, extends directly into Kopore’s recently granted Namibian licences "
To Fill or Not to Fill
When someone says a gap has been filled, that means the price has moved back to the original pre-gap level. These fills are quite common and occur because of the following:
Irrational exuberance: The initial spike may have been overly optimistic or pessimistic, therefore inviting a correction.
Technical resistance: When a price moves up or down sharply, it doesn't leave behind any support or resistance.
Price Pattern: Price patterns are used to classify gaps and can tell you if a gap will be filled or not.
Exhaustion gaps are typically the most likely to be filled because they signal the end of a price trend, while continuation and breakaway gaps are significantly less likely to be filled since they are used to confirm the direction of the current trend.
When gaps are filled within the same trading day on which they occur, this is referred to as fading. For example, let's say a company announces great earnings per share for this quarter and it gaps up at open (meaning it opened significantly higher than its previous close). Now let's say, as the day progresses, people realize that the cash flow statement shows some weaknesses, so they start selling. Eventually, the price hits yesterday's close, and the gap is filled. Many day traders use this strategy during earnings season or at other times when irrational exuberance is at a high.
The good thing about the bid, even if it was low - ball regards the district scale potential...is MOD (MTR) should be on the majors radar from here on in...just my thoughts...
....possible district scale....enough said
Spot on Joe.....Sacre blue indeed...lol
lol.....you realists.......thanks for your take on the Sprott Note. I hope they have thought about the realities of this investment prior to advising their clients to buy.
Massive exploration upside appears to be the main focus of their investment ......long term view required here IMO.
The note extracts as posted below kind of supports the recent RR comment regards a 'Spectacular Discovery' IMO
The most recent deposit to join the giant category is Cupric Canyon’s Zone 5 discovery in Botswana, along strike
of MOD’s T3 deposit. As this is the first deposit of major size in the Kalahari Copperbelt, it is a game-changer for
the endowment of the basin in our view. Specifically, it establishes the Ghanzi-Chobe basin as only the seventh
basin globally to host a giant sediment-hosted copper deposit.
Our view: We think the Kalahari Copperbelt that hosts the 2Mt Cu Zone 5 deposit and where MTR has exposure
to 16,000km2
is a premier belt for sediment-hosted copper exploration globally, and potentially the best on a risk-
adjusted basis. Of the seven belts that have demonstrated potential to host giant deposits, the Kalahari Copperbelt
is unique in that it is both in an excellent jurisdiction and underexplored, with easy access to drill and low population
density. The Kalahari Copperbelt has largely ‘flown under the radar’ because its potential was only established
recently per the discovery history shown in Figure 8, and because of widespread post-mineral cover. As porphyry
belts are over-explored at surface and sub-economic at depth, large copper discoveries are stalling globally and
majors are returning to the sediment-hosted copper class. Coupled with MOD/MTR’s dominant land position and
demonstrated targeting success under-cover (see below), we see this as one of the most exciting copper
exploration plays among junior explorers globally.
https://twitter.com/tmsreach/status/1083288071578238976?s=21
Forrest4032.....Have you had Weetabix today.......lol
Plummeting sp........As is everything else in every pf around the world.......Trump.......FED....Credit cycle....Brexit......to blame.....shorter's paradise
thefierce1, I also noted the Bolgas post as you mentioned below, Bolgas appears a very knowledgeable and informed poster.....hopefully he/she shall continue to contribute to the board and maybe reinvest as the geopolitical and macro economic environment improves....
"Conviction in their purchases doesn't apply to sheeple."....very true....and the MM's know it..... don't they....send in the dogs to worry the sheep .....lol
As the response may influence yours and others decision to add, hold or sell when such decisions should be based on one's own risk profile and research conviction. ....some large holders sell down for a multitude of reasons such as portfolio balance, margin calls (leveraged forced sellers) and or Tax considerations to name but a few....hope this helps...
Look on Morning Star....personally I don' think such a question should be asked of an investor nor should it be relevant....you should have the the strength of your own conviction and research....
They have bought directly on the market before so it is a possibility.....I suspect the large investors here have all been forewarned regards the sp movement....as bonkers said earlier, the sp it directly correlated to the assets (T3) and eventually the market will value the company thus!
Exactly...! Whilst they can.....I bet Sprott aren't panicking...lol