Member Info for antigua18

Spades, my point is more about demand being there for our shares.

Yes but as we’ve been told many times the deal was accretive, so in theory the extra shares should be cancelled out. Buying 100 % of the assets should have meant some lift to the share price. Otherwise what was the point in purchasing?

I don’t disagree that other gold companies are suffering, but it’s simply wrong to attribute any of that to us and our predicament. Shaun has pulled off the deal of the century and up to now it’s worth absolutely zero to our share price. GDXJ buying millions of shares and yet we’re going backwards.

Let’s be clear here, the reason we are at this price is manipulation, nothing to do with the market sector.

It’s total bull to accuse people of not doing research, it’s all done for us, virtually hourly posters on Lse provide notes and details on the company. I can’t think of another chat board with so much info posted.

Is it too much to want the share price to rise without being an accused of short term thinking when expressing frustration?

The elephant in the room has never been the fundamentals, it’s always been an undervalued share price. This has got massively worse with the companies growth, which obviously goes against the reason we invest.

Something perverse is going on here right in front of our eyes and the way it’s being pushed to the side by the usual suspects on the board.

Manipulation on here as well as the share price.

The leak was about the raise!

I agree, if I looked on every chat board of my shares nearly all state the immortal line of “this is so undervalued right now” 😂

I will say though that this share is worse by a country mile, the manipulation that goes on here is unbelievable.

spades, the issue for me is that if was only pi’s buying then the share price would be rising nicely due to simple supply and demand. however, when the big boys buy it’s done secretively and only revealed at the end of the day as per the ****e rules that go against the little man.

if all trades were announced when executed then there wouldn’t be an issue. starbright of co**** will argue that mm’s are simply making the market, however, i would argue that they are actually distorting the market since they are actively holding the price back to fulfill the supposedly agreed order. this is where i feel the shorters step in to fill the gap, only too happy to sell low and suppress the share price further.

the simple question here is that if someone wants millions of shares why are they being allowed to buy cheaper than we have to at market rate simply because of their access to the mm’s.

this is proved when the gdxj rebalances, when finished and declared we see a large amount of shares traded that’s revealed at the end, which then artificially gives a much higher share price temporarily, then on the following monday it’s back where originally was, thus cancelling out the perceived buy/demand. the only reason for this being the trades have been hidden from the market during the day/week.

i’m my view if the authorities were forced to investigate then this would be far worse than ppi scandal and such like since it clearly disadvantages the general public.

i wonder if we moved to the main market things would be slightly better.

On the surface it’s supposed to be a fair level playing field where we all buy at market price, but as we all know it’s corrupt. Big players can approach the Mm’s and virtually set their own price and more often than not they are happy to oblige. What makes it worse is that it goes on right in front of us and the authorities do nothing. They must know what’s going on, which begs the question are they part of it or being persuaded to look the other way.

Sd has done what he was paid to do, to build a company. He has succeeded from a weak position to where we are now. Nobody can dispute that.

The share price is a different matter, one that’s not as easy to sort. Events have overtaken us, as we’ve moved to a fully fledged company it means a less speculative punt to a proper investment. The latter gives less returns, but a more security.

Personally I’d hoped to be partly out prior to this changeover, but with the share price games I will be forced to stay longer.

A good realistic appraisal of the situation Dip, we can still make money, but need to work out an exit strategy rather than holding on blindly.

Will be interesting to see what future dividend policy will be, hopefully anyone trapped will get some reward in the future.

I won’t deny that the deal is good for building the company, but it’s been bad for investors, giving so many shares away has totally destroyed the massive returns many of us had hoped for. Now the deal is done we’re still waiting for the share price to take off. It always seems over the next horizon.

The talk and aspirations of 20p is disappointing to say the least.

Consolidation is cosmetic and won’t benefit us in anyway.

IMHO

Starbright, why are you here?

Most of us on this forum invest in Ggp in the belief the company will give good returns, but all you do is waffle and snipe in all your posts with your subtle put downs. Whether it’s your intention or not you come across as a complete arrogant A hole.

It’s obvious your not invested in Ggp, so why not tell us who you work for as you clearly have an ulterior motive or are a Narcissist. Which one is it?

Excuse after excuse, it’s never the right time in his mind. Reality is, he has no intention of bringing this back to the market.

All this secondary market stuff is just a smokescreen to keep us trapped, after all who in their right mind would buy our shares on that market.

I’m unsure about the reason, being needed to consolidate for admission, my understanding is it needed to be a minimum price, which I believed to be around 10-12p equivalent.

Unless I’m wrong?

Whilst technically correct, it nearly always changes sentiment.

Share consolidation is nothing more than a vanity project, as you say nothing changes, so why bother doing it when it’s just window dressing.

Thanks for sharing bigbench. After all the BS over the years only to suggest some tin pot exchange that most can’t use is the final straw in my view. Is it now time us long suffering shareholders forced the company to wind up. Why should we allow this to continue when we are shown total contempt. In my view this is a cynical attempt to keep us locked in and fund this lifestyle company.

Yet again there seems to be a concerted effort to attack the share price, along with the usual suspects sowing discontent and negative tone, both in lock step.

It’s sooooooo boring 🥱