Member Info for Agray

They give the same. Read off the chart for the historical data. Set yahoo to 1 month chart and you can read off each day. they correspond on both websites

Https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/quote/FLTCF/

I'm interested to hear developments in their production ability. Their serviceable market had just gone up x7 so how can they scale. I think musk is crucial to our ability to scale up with his technical knowhow

Everyone talking about the Iran war. We will move in drill results. Otherwise it's just a penny here or there

Let's not exaggerated. They were decent buys that were only marginally bigger than the large sells in the morning. There is no volume currently so people are waiting to see results in the current climate. Nothing wrong with that. I'm still positive on drill results but let's not make up market action

Yep. That contract was for civilian based satellite infrastructure. The bonus would then be Tue fact that as well as starlinks huge expected rollout following their plans government approval, they may also get a slice of the pie regarding the space defence contracts

The futures bright for FTC. My thinking has always been if they are going to provide service for spacex satellite rollout then they will need to expand again. Musk should be looking at this to buy, expand in the US and secure his production. What price he would he willing to pay is Tue question though.

Directors selling at these levels made me think we are maybe a little ahead of ourselves currently so I've trimmed a bit. See where we settle

IN fairness, Maxvelocity has been reported several times for abusing element! So I don't think they are one and the same. He's been one of the most rampant blinkered supporters of the company since Feb 2026. I think Brad can be an extremely competent geologist and a poor CEO. I don't rate him in terms of getting stuff done on time. Everything is almost ready. However, he has also redefined the drilling campaign and massively increased Omi shareholder value.

Legal, can you please cool the ramping. It's dangerous for newbies. Stick to the facts. We have decent results today. It shows the potential for success at more holes. No one knows they will strike more. We hope. Nothing more. Please stop dressing up exploration risk as absolutely certainty of success. There will have been plenty of folk that bought in on the constant ramping that will have lost significant money in the fall from 40.

Not convinced it's manipulation. Omi is an explorer that is waiting to find more gold. We dropped low before the war so I didn't expect any kind of pop today that would hold. This needs positive news to move it up. Find more gold and the gold price increase becomes relevant. Until then producers can bounce back but not sure omi can

News and contract dependent though. We haven't had contract news in a long time. Interview stated that space x was a great company but all the others were very slow to order anything.

Is there anything to be taken from the angle of the drill in the photo? Appears to be 45%. My understanding of the complexities of mining is limited, but at that depth, is it associated with having found something in the original core drilling, and now wishing to map out the depth and width of potential deposits?

I appreciate that RNS cost money but not sure they should release news through twitter. Expansion of mining program probably justifies an RNS. Not all investors will be on twitter

Really interesting read.

Drilling isn't finishing for another 2 weeks at El P. Not going to see a report until at least 14th March. Feet up and patience required.

It's exactly what Brad had said. All three sites are on the same liscence so pepas gives access to the others as well

I liked the interview LW, but where did he say majors have been in touch over Pepas and El P? A good interview doesn't need to be exaggerated and pumped.

What it doesn't provide is the reason Louis mentioned flotation. Grind incompatibility may be a reason but hopeful increase in size of pre body could be another. Just guesswork currently. Clearly tolling is preferable from a speed to cash perspective

Based on reports surrounding Orosur Mining’s (OMI) Pepas prospect within the Anzá project in Colombia, a "flotation operation" refers to a potential, dedicated onsite processing facility needed to treat high-grade, complex mineralized material that is not suitable for standard third-party tolling.

What "Flotation" Means for Pepas:

Deposit Specificity: The Pepas ore is high-grade (approx. 5.46 g/t Au) and requires specific grinding (approx. 70 microns), which does not align with existing local third-party tolling facilities that operate at coarser grinds (approx. 120 microns).

Dedicated Infrastructure: To maximize recovery of the high-grade, near-surface gold, Orosur is evaluating constructing a dedicated, small-scale onsite plant rather than relying on external tolling.

Process: The operation would involve crushing and grinding the ore to a fine powder (70 microns), followed by froth flotation to separate the gold-bearing sulphide minerals from the waste rock.

ScienceDirect.com

ScienceDirect.com

+4

Cost of Flotation Operation vs. Tolling:

Construction Costs (Flotation Plant): Building a dedicated processing plant at Pepas is estimated to cost between US$70 million and US$100 million.

Operating Costs (Flotation): While building a plant is capital-intensive, the resulting high-grade operation aims to keep All-in Sustaining Costs (AISC) below US$1,150/oz.

Tolling Costs: While initially faster to implement, third-party tolling is likely unworkable for Pepas due to metallurgical incompatibility (fine grind required).

Economics: The high grade (5.46 g/t Au) and low stripping ratio of the deposit are expected to generate high margins that can support the high initial capital expenditure of a dedicated plant.

In summary, for Pepas, a dedicated flotation plant is a high-cap-ex ($70m-$100m) option designed to handle specific metallurgy and secure high-margin production, whereas external tolling, while having lower initial capital cost, is considered technically unsuitable.

Indeed. I'm building in to my thinking Tue idea that either we have more and a mine is feasible or tolling isn't an option due to incompatibility of ore. AI initially suggested that tolling would be fine but another query returned an answer explaining that no local mine would accept pepas ore!