Member Info for 67Sam

Macq

"does that mean it will now be next week"

Probably the 17th giving notice for the 23rd. Or there is still another chance after that on the 24th July to announce a judgement that will be handed down on the 30th July.

As Liberty says, their advice was not a guarantee, just a guide. But I think they would want to stick to the timescales anticipated.

John46 hasn't posted since March this year. Funny to look back at his old posts. He occupied a similar space to the one STP is now in.

Thanks tophat

Ant

"you lot post some utter 💩 s h i t e."

You quite frequently post your opinions about politics and immigration and I dont usually come at you calling them "utter 💩 s h i t e".

I think it's really important not to allow others to try and rewrite history, particularly when it comes to Nazi history. Ive set out facts and arguments to disprove Blowers false belief that Hitler was a socialist.

I dont care if that means nothing to you. Enough others will understand exactly why it's vital to do these things.

BB

The "socialist" label was partly a strategic move to co-opt leftist rhetoric and compete with the growing popularity of socialist and communist movements in Weimar Germany. It was far more about populism than genuine socialist ideology. Some argue the Nazis’ public works projects resemble socialist policies, but these were pragmatic measures to consolidate power, reduce unemployment and prepare for war - never to achieve social equity. While the state exerted significant control over the economy, it was to serve nationalist and militaristic goals, not to redistribute wealth or empower workers. Unions were banned and workers’ rights were suppressed. Hitler’s regime was fundamentally anti-socialist, aligning more with fascism and extreme nationalism than any form of socialism. Hitler vehemently opposed Marxist socialism and communism, viewing them as threats to his vision of a racially "pure" German State. The Nazis persecuted and murdered socialists, communists, and trade unionists, including sending them to concentration camps. Nazi ideology prioritised ultranationalism, antisemitism, and the cult of the Führer over any socialist ideals. Policies aimed to create a unified national identity, not economic equality.

Hitler called himself a socialist and you fell for it. Let's see how long it takes for you to get this post deleted.

BB

I got to go out now, but no doubt we will continue this.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/02/05/right-needs-stop-falsely-claiming-that-nazis-were-socialists/

Close Brother now 8.7% up on the day, trading at £4.1166

"I SIGNED A FEW DOCUMENTS THEN DROVE THE CARE AWAY !!!"

Tough t i t s then. Signing things without reading them does have risks.

If the amount of commission wasn't stated anywhere then yes, fair cop, otherwise on your bike (or your Suzuki Swift).

German socialism and trade unions were destroyed by 1933. Hitler blamed the Jews for many things including losing the first world war. The Nazis held private property and entrepreneurship in high esteem.

Yep well said Darth. Hitler was a nationalist totalitarian dictator with absolute centralisation of decision-making.

"totally kill the city of London"

I think they know that and will compromise with the middle ground.

My guess they will state that no fiduciary duty exists, but the amount of commission should have always been disclosed.

Big

"I am hearing from a good source that the date of the SC announcement will be 23/7"

That is a Wednesday, so if you mean the judgement is actually handed down that day, they would have to first announce it on Thursday 17th July.

A1

"SC announcement 23/7 ???"

Thats rumoured on the CBG board as well, but no source is given. Did you get it from there? If it's true, they will announce it on the 17th July here https://supremecourt.uk/news If it's not announced as a "future judgement" by the 24th, then it isn't going to happen in July at all.

Skier

The guardian got hold of 4000 peoples responses if whom some said 'i might be due a refund".

From that they deduce there will be a bill of 50 billion pounds.

They aren't usually that desperate for column inches.

Https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/jul/07/more-than-23m-britons-think-they-may-be-due-compensation-for-mis-sold-car-loans-uk-poll-finds

Obviously a headline that 23 Million people believe they might be due compensation at a total cost off 50 Billion pounds grabs attention.

But I think its particularly shoddy reporting, as its based on the results of asking 4000 people. Of those asked, "45% of people think they might be entitled to a payout over a car finance plan taken out between 2007 and 2021"

FFs .... if someone was asked "did you buy a car using dealer finance between 2007 and 2021?" why would anyone say "I think I might have". If they cant even be sure whether they bought one, its unlikely they will have any paperwork to hand.

I wonder how many people here would answer "yes I did"?

Not me.

🥱

Why the bored face?

Im sure it will all be fine. With the FCA in charge, what could possibly wrong?

Hu

"The FCA have already said they will give details of any redress scheme they will impose within 6 months of the SC judgement".

"The FCA will confirm within 6 weeks of the Supreme Court judgment whether it is proposing to introduce a redress scheme. If so, it will set out timings for when it will issue a consultation paper. Subject to the consultation the FCA would expect firms to implement the scheme in 2026."

https://www.regulationtomorrow.com/eu/fcas-potential-consumer-redress-scheme-for-motor-finance agreements/#:~:text=The%20FCA%20will%20confirm%20within,implement%20the%20scheme%20in%202026.

Also it's worth remembering that after the SC ruling on PPI in November 2014, it took the FCA until March 2017, nearly two and a half years, to issue final rules and guidance on payment protection insurance (PPI) complaints. That may be a problem for lenders, as there will be an initial nosedive probably followed by years of this hanging over them.

Heres a summary that was published in April after the case was heard. It's nearer to Adewins outlook than my slightly more pessimistic view.

https://www.freeths.co.uk/insights-events/legal-articles/2025/motor-finance-supreme-court-hearing-the-latest-viewpoint/

Card

She already tried, and they told her to bog off. The SC approved applications from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and trade body the National Franchised Dealers Association. The judgement will be known in less than 18 more trading days, so not long now.