Member Info for 4PetesSake

You lie again when you can say that you never ramp, when you posted this back in October!

“😂😂😂 cheers for your research lol come back here in a few months when it'll be worth 60/70 p a share then bookmark this chat”

INV86

It doesn’t matter how much I know but the proof is in the pudding and on the evidence of our comments on here it is abundantly clear as to which of us knows more.

But the guy who sold 2,500,000 MAST shares yesterday afternoon clearly knows a lot more than both of us. Instead of accepting £87.5k for his shares he might have considered holding until the SP got back to 5.25p where it was just 19 days ago and instead got £131.25k. BUT he didn’t and instead ditched them at 3.5p a share.

That alone should speak volumes to you, but I suspect that you are too set in your ways to change direction.

What I posted yesterday at 15:24 hours re a background sell that would be declared later. It was not rocket science , just something that most seasoned investors could spot a mile off.

Yet the lemmings couldn’t help themselves, thinking they were getting a bargain buy at 3.6p.There really are some very gullible people around. 🫨

Well, that was some prediction!!

There at the end of the day we have the massive sell of 2,500,000 at 3.5p raising £87.5k.

Now we know for sure what was driving the price down.

It’ ll be interesting to see to see where this opens in the morning. ⬇️

Scouse,

You’re a glutton for punishment.

This suggests there could be a big sell coming through later, maybe even after 4.30pm. We’ll have to wait and see, but is unusual for the price to have dropped so much when currently buys are exceeding sells by 2-1?

INV86

You know it only peaked at 213p because of bogus advertising. So does this mean who are happy for fake news to be published if it benefits your Mickey Mouse company.

Loss Jock

You state the following:

“mast have had nothbut good news one rns after the other”

Have you not noticed that these useless RNSs have caused the SP to fall 98%.

If you are so confident of a rise then why don’t you remortgage your house and buy more at 3.84p which is close to its lowest bid price.

Actually, I guess that you’re not that confident after all.

INV86

You’re just thinking about those Bogus Articles that were written about MAST to artificially inflate the SP.

I’m talking about reputable Finance sites like the Financial Times, Yahoo Finance, Bloomberg, Reuters, etc.

I’m sure that you are a conspiracy theorist 😂😂😂

INV86

Yet again, you are WRONG 🚫 the main funding for Financial Websites is from advertising.

Financial websites are funded through a variety of models, primarily driven by advertising, affiliate partnerships, and user subscriptions. Because they often attract a high-value audience, they can generate significant revenue.

Here are the primary ways financial websites are funded:

Advertisers (Pay-Per-Click & Display Ads): Advertisers pay to have their ads shown on the site, often using networks like Google Adsense. In the finance sector, CPC (cost-per-click) can be very high, making ads a major revenue source.

Affiliate Marketing & Commissions: Websites often earn revenue by referring users to financial products like credit cards, loans, or brokerage accounts. They receive a commission (sometimes 30%-70%) if a user signs up for a service.

Subscription Models (Premium Content): Some websites charge users a recurring fee for access to exclusive research, expert analysis, or specialized data tools.

Corporate Sponsorships & Content: Financial firms may pay to have branded content, sponsored articles, or tools hosted on a website to reach a specific audience.

Data Monetization: Some sites may sell anonymized information about user behavior to market researchers or financial firms.

It’s funny that you of all people should talk about companies going bust, especially on this BB 😂😂😂

INV.

The M/Cap here is £6.72m

Please can you explain how such a tiny little loss making company will have hundreds of millions to spend in a few years time.

You really are delusional.

Inv86

I also said that you could check my facts and figures on Financial Websites or Anywhere Else, which you conveniently ignored.

These are historical facts and were never intended to tell you what will happen this year.

I’ve already given my thoughts on that towards the end of last year

You are welcome to check my Numbers, Percentages and Facts on AI , Financial Websites or anywhere else and you’ll find them to be accurate.

The fact that you cannot pinpoint any actual errors but just talk “Generally” is proof that you are waffling.

Have a great weekend and take a much needed break.

Inv86

Did you make a little slip when you mentioned Hinslip❓😂😂😂

Just posting facts and I’d do the same IF it went up - Surely this is better than posting, “Wishful thinking”.

The closing mid-prices each Friday since the 213p High

23/1/26 3.975 ⬇️ -0.87%

16/1/26 4.01 ⬇️ -20.6%

9/1/26 5.05 🐈‍⬛ +22.4%

2/1/26 4.125 ⬇️ -8.6%

26/12/25 4.512p ⬇️ -1.9%

19/12/25 4.6p ⬇️ -4.2%

12/12/25 4.8p ⬇️ -11.1%

5/12/25 5.45p ⬇️ -22.1%

28/11/25 7p ⬇️ -19.5%

21/11/25 8.7p⬇️ -19.4%

14/11/25 10.8p ⬇️ -47.1%

7/11/25 20.4p ⬇️ -0.5%

31/10/25 20.5p 🐈‍⬛ +18.8%

24/10/25 17.26p ⬇️ -17.8%

17/10/25 21p ⬇️ -35.1%

10/10/25 32.35p ⬇️ -28.1%

3/10/25 45p ⬇️ -56.3%

26/9/25 103p ⬇️ -23.7%

19/9/25 135p 🐈‍⬛ +37%

12/9/25 98.45p ⬇️ -47.4%

5/9/25 187p having reached 213p

17 weekly falls ⬇️ with 3 dead cat bounces 🐈‍⬛ Just a very small drop this week, but the first ever weekly close below 4p. Volume has been extremely low with only 196 trades today resulting in 529k sold and 596k sold.

At the beginning of the week noCando66 PROMISED us that mast would rise - He LIED‼️

Be careful wat you wish for‼️

In the last four months, the end result of every R.N. S has been a fall in the share price‼️

Dglos

I completely agree with your post.

I’m sure that Maidit’s foul and vulgar post will be removed. A word like, that even with hyphens is off limits.

Scouse

What makes you think that an RNS is on the way?

Do you have inside information, or are you just guessing?

It is common practice for those who have made substantial losses on shares to blame:

1. SHORTING

2. Those posting negatively on BB’s

3. MMs manipulating the SP

4. Smoke and Mirrors

5. Negative press articles

BUT, they will never blame the really cause, namely the numpties running the company.

An Internet search on MAST Shorting came up with the following:

As of January 2026, it appears there are no significant or publicly reported open short positions on Mast Energy Developments Plc (MAST), with major platforms indicating a lack of substantial short interest,

So don’t believe the LIES from the Rampers blaming Shorting, because it just isn’t happening.