Member Info for 2cvguy

Thanks for reminding me where I'd seen that LTI. It's a massive relief that I haven't lost the plot, even though me mentioning £75m was all in CB's imagination.

He was spot on that you always resort to saying those who disagree with you know nothing..

Eyes on the prize.

You must have been a very good boy this year to get what you asked for. Should be a good Christmas for you.

Wasn't someone asking for piccies of the conveyors ?

Ha ! No. Hence no question mark.

No more than an observation that life isn't always fair and that them with money have always had unfair advantages and probably always will.

What'ya gonna do, eh.

Nothing in any of my posts claiming I was there or heard anything so what is your point ? Or is it just the usual ploy of trying to discredit those who don't share your opinion ?

I'm not claiming to have heard any facts. I can't, as I was not there. You, however, continue to post as though you were, but I think we have established that you were not.

Unreliable witness, or worse ?

So to be absolutely clear, you were not at the latest investor presentation ?

If that's correct, then why do your posts try to give the impression that you were ("JC was long on words ..." "JC left early" etc) ?

In a courtroom scenario you are what would be termed an unreliable witness.

It's interesting that there don't seem to have been any negative reports from those whe WERE at the presentation, only from those who weren't.

I don't think it will offend anybody to say that I don't fully rely on what anyone posts here. But to the extent that I do pay attention, does it make sense to give the more weight to opinions from those who made the effort to get up to date information, rather than someone who didn't bother ? Hmmm ...

Surely you had the opportunity to raise all your concerns when you were at the investor event, Colour ? What replies did you get to the questions you asked of the BoD ?

Funny how irony goes over the head of some.

FWIW Ruck,I pretty much agree with you on this.

But as you said, "It was a casual, throwaway comment" so I thought it was odd that it evolved into such a debate.

Yes, I got the context fine, thanks.

It just seems ridiculous (to me) that there are so many prepared to have an argument about the most trivial thing.

I'm not even sure I really understand the question.

That's a question for itsonelouder.

Morning Multi. That's some highly interesting info you've posted there, especially the bit about increasing production. Any chance you can overlook my laziness and point me in the direction of where you found this?

Thanks Vas. It implies EESL are overseeing this project, and yet the tender specifies RF Mesh. Who'd of thought it ?

CB: "I will not say another word if someone can dispel my information with a known fact.". JC did not leave the meeting early as you have repeatedly stated. Fact. A simple fact maybe, but it speaks volumes that you would post even this false information. Not expecting that you will stop posting though - I put that promise in the same box as you saying you were leaving a few weeks back

I haven't seen anyone at the meeting say that JC left early. Is that another of your "facts" cb ?