Member Info for 2cvguy

Morning Jmitc, just some steady chipping away by the looks of it.

Lots of people get all excited when they see a big buy and hope someone is in the know, but all it proves is that someone has deep pockets. It's you guys with the steady buys over time that really demonstrate continued confidence in the company.

Nice to see LTI receiving some credibility after suffering years if ridicule. Congratulations LTI, you've made it !

Almost zero chance of any placing shortfall imo. I'm pretty sure the participants would have been sounded out long ago, after all its been on the cards for months. And overfiend is right imo --- any problem raising funds would have happened 2 or 3 years ago, not now when orders are arriving for a new product.

Very nice to look in and see this blue. Well done to anyone who got in over the last week, the timing didn't quite work out for me, but hey ho.

Intriguing that the 3m doesn't appear on capitamoney trades list. Usually quite reliable I think.

http://capita.moneyam.com/trades/WRES/W-Resources.html-trades

Does this mean anything ?

Anyone else noticed that this month's Proactive Presentation is already available on the Scancell website ?

http://www.scancell.co.uk/investors/company-docs

Haven't seen it mentioned, but apols if I have missed it.

As long as the ultimate value of deal(s) is not based on the SP then 8p is not a problem for me, and great for buying.

Thanks TF and Steve. I'll stop fretting !

One off-the-wall thought ocurred to me with the FDA requirement for more info on Trigrid 2 - what happens if Ichor produce a Trigrid 3.0 and version 2 becomes obsolete with no consumables available (as is the case with V1?) ? Presumably we don't have to go through trials again ?

Is there a precedent of treatments already in use with Trigrid 1?

Excellent post, ciaskin, and in the full context the absence of "near to short term" monetisation so far does make sense. Not to labour the point, but if CH had clarified that he meant monetisation will be quick once in the later stages then that would have been much more satisfactory than the glib explanation that "it's a relative term".

I'm sure it will all be forgiven and forgotten though when the amazing work of Lindy and Sally and their team is duly recognised by them what hold the chequebooks.

It's abvious to anyone who has spoken to or listened to Lindy that she is driven in her fight to cure cancer, so whatever our frustrations are with the time taken to enter trials, I am sure it is far worse for her.

CH's explanation that near to short term is "relative" was really the only bit of the AGM that annoyed me. Just seemed like a fudge to me, and I got the impression he is not one to put his hands up and say he's made a mistake. I was a bit disappointed that the Q&A was curtailed by the urgent entrance of the coffee and biccies too, although I had to leave immediately on another mission, so the abrupt end did suit me.

I assume LD's section was exciting, but I didn't understand very much of it ! I followed her talk last year reasonably well, so maybe too many brain cells have died over the last 12 months.

The lowly SP seemed to be the main concern of the vocal section of the audience, and I didn't think the BoD were all that keen to discuss it. As said earlier, it might have been better if they had pre-empted the complaints by bringing it up first. Can't say the SP bothers me particularly unless a fund-raise is due, but I didn't get the impression that one is.

Oh goody. It's called "entertainment". Apparently.

Sorry, I thought it was my turn.

It should be on prescription for a select few here then perhaps they wouldn't be so full of sh.. LOL

That actually sounds like a brilliant insult safety, although (or maybe because) it makes no sense. Just fits in with the rest of his rantings though.

First time I've seen such a confession so not even sure I trust it. But if true it would be great from the point of irony if all RR's dire predictions came true now his handler has allegedly loaded up. Really can't see it happening though so I will just have to compensate with the profits we all hope for and expect.

For those that demand "balance" - have you considered it may not be possible because maybe, just maybe, at some point the positives will far outweigh any negatives ? Perhaps I am biased but for me that time is already here.

Hello Colour. Have you worked out what 33.3% of £240m is yet ?

Jaf, I don't agree with you, but nevertheless if you feel RR should be debated with then why not give it a go. See how far you get.