Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPO. Watch the video here.
You actually think posting rubbish on here 24/7 is fulfilling?
How quaint!
Watch your inbox folks
Rampant green box twat today! Everyone join me
In filtering the moron and she will find another forum to wind up
Clear as day what this attention seeking twat is after
As for the rest of us, payday is coming
You’re wasting your time Addicknt. He’d argue selling a paper clip is dilutive. He’s that kind of tosspot
Don’t feed the virus
Most people get it Rodney, only one plonker doesn’t
Add - I don’t think she gets that shares in circulation would not increase so it wouldn’t be classed as dilutive
You can of course argue ANY raising of funds is dilutive! An offtake or royalty affects future profits, a sale of an asset reduces owned assets
The name of the game is getting to the bid point with the most intact, that’s when our investment matures
Just block the twat, i did
But if they didn’t sell them then they’d be cancelled and become relutive.
So one could argue that placing them is technically dilutive. Splitting hairs I know
Exploitation agreement rubber stamps and is followed by an offtake is my prediction
Of course there are teething issues, that’s fine and in a free market they’ll resolve themselves, become competitive and win market share
But that’s not what we have, we have a stupid collectivist movement using policy and mandates to push tech onto people who don’t want and/or can’t afford it.
I like weekends away and I like getting into my Range Rover at the hotel on Sunday morning and just driving home. Not looking for a charging point, not worrying if I’ll make it to wherever the next is
Heating pumps are ugly and noisy. Gas is cheap and plentiful and we have hundreds of years of
Our own supply. It is also reliable and doesn’t suffer from intermittency issues
By perhaps trumping all this is the undeniable fact that anything U.K. does to cut its emissions is totally pointless in the bigger picture. It’s economic self harm
Tesla if you’ve done your maths and concluded that green tech is for you that’s absolutely fine, what most people object to is the use of mandates and our own money as subsidy in propping up these choices
If these products were good enough and cheap enough then people would be knocking the door down to buy them. This clearly isn’t the case
Not everyone is in the market for a 90-100k new car but many of those who are don’t care about a minimal cost such as fuelling it. In fact the opposite would be true, those spending that money without subsidy would value the convenience of petrol far more than the price of a charge
Quady a heat pump isn’t for me for the same reason solar panels aren’t, the ROI doesn’t work. You do your calcs on a thirty year assumption. You won’t be here in 30 years!
As for living alone, it’s you married fools who are missing out. Why put up with the same old trout when you can have a variety of younger and better models at your disposal?
On the quarterly review the EMS has changed today so MMs now have to offer a minimum of 150,000 shares on bid and ask (previously 50,000)
I used three different online calculators. The main parameters seem to be post code and house orientation (ie how much sun do you get)
Then there’s how much power do you use, I live alone
The annual “saving” doesn’t even cover the interest born on a 4% bond for the £12k let alone repay the capital
The master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he does not know
Quady I gave you the solution
£12k invested in solar panels I will get my £12k back I 17 years
£12k invested in a 4% bond I’ve got my £12k back and another £8k profit
This is exactly why it doesn’t make any sense. The argument is the same for those wretched electric cars. Enormous list price, “cheap” fuel (often made by burning gas and oil) and horrific residuals
When you look at the whole story not just the woke headline, it never adds up
I ran it for my house and it came out at 17 years. That is with not investing the £12,000 initial outlay into something like a bond. When you do a comparison like that (ie a real world one), the numbers look shocking (clue, a 4% bond would return you 8k on your initial 12 over that 17 years you’re paying the solar cost back)
Heat pumps haven’t sold because nobody wants to upend their entire heating system and spend thousands if not tens of thousands of their own dash for something inferior that doesn’t get as hot
They’d sell like hot cakes if they were financially viable, as would EVs
But they’re not so people don’t want them! Simple supply and demand really, even a bird brain like you could understand it if you allowed yourself to
If I talk complete rubbish, then how come take up of the £7500 grants is so embarrassingly small?
If people don’t want this rubbish with such a hefty discount, why will they want it when it’s double the price down the road?
Solar no longer pays at all, the ROI is greater than the lifespan of the panels. If you have to subsidise something to make it viable, then it simply isn’t viable
If renewables are cheap, why are our bills so high? Surely we should be getting it for free when the wind is blowing
And you still haven’t solved intermittency.
It’s a joke( a very bad one that maniacs like you are being used to peddle into society)
Millions will die over this
But HH knows sweet FA about spread betting. I remember him trying to tell someone who wrote spread betting software how it works!
A bit like trying to tell Paul Hollywood what went into his cakes and how he made them
A) you can’t give everybody a £7500 grant, just do the basic maths and see what that runs to for 31
Million homes
B) grants are our own money anyway, and vanishingly few families can afford to Willy wave and pay the rest of the balance
C) gas is incredibly cheap, coal is even cheaper. Renewables cost a fortune and can only be put in place by selling us wind at the same price as peak gas was! Otherwise nobody would build and provide it
So it’s rather obvious. We will be sticking with gas. If we had any sense at all we’d be putting coal power stations up like the Chinese to power our industry and manufacturing
Cheap energy is prosperity. Unicorn dreams are financial ruin and poverty for all
How do you replace 31 million gas boilers at a cost of at least £10,000 each?
What about all the gas cookers?
Where do people who can’t make ends meet get a spare ten or twenty grand from to update their heating system to something inferior?
The problem with you climate goons is that you can’t apply simple economics to your utopian ideologies
Even if a family has £10k spare, are they more likely to spend it on a dream holiday or a new heat pump?
It beggars belief how stupid the people are who think this will all happen by 2050
He’s definitely updating the website, he refers to it in communication with shareholders
Not printed yet, big balls or decent intel?