28 Jun 2014 02:06
Lone Star Value Issues Personal Letter To Antares Shareholders
Notes Recent Moves by Antares Show the Urgent Need for Board Enhancement
Believes CEO James Cruickshank Runs the Company for His Own Benefit
Commits that New Board, if Elected, Will Buy Back Stock to Offset Dilution of Recent Convertible Debt Issuance
PR Newswire
NEW YORK, June 27, 2014
NEW YORK, June 27, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Lone Star Value Investors, LP ("Lone Star Value", "we", or "us") is a significant shareholder of Antares Energy Limited (ASX: AZZ) (AZZEF) ("Antares" or the "Company") and is seeking to enhance the Board of Antares (the "Board") through the election of five new independent directors and the removal of two employee directors at a General Meeting of Antares. Today, Lone Star Value issued a personal letter from its founder, Jeffrey E. Eberwein, to the shareholders of Antares.
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
I wanted to take this opportunity to tell you about myself, our firm, why we decided to invest in Antares, and why we believe it is so urgent to change Antares' Board at this time. Although I founded Lone Star Value last year and Antares is our first investment in Australia, I have invested in Australia throughout my career and plan to do so for a long time to come. I am originally from Dallas, Texas and have worked with, or invested in, energy companies for 23 years. As a senior portfolio manager at Viking Global and Soros Fund Management, I invested significant amounts of capital globally with a particular emphasis on resource companies. Lone Star Value plans to be a long term investor in Australia and in Antares. In short, we're here to stay.
We first began buying Antares stock because we saw a huge gap between the value of its assets and the price at which its shares were trading. We believe this gap is mainly due to Mr. Cruickshank running the Company as his personal fiefdom at shareholders' expense. After analysing the Company and speaking with many frustrated shareholders, we committed to a significant investment and hands-on involvement by enhancing Antares' Board. We believe we can begin to close Antares' value gap through our proposed enhancements. Our goal is to maximise Antares' stock price over the long term – we are not here to make a quick buck and leave the Company in a worse position.
Mr. Cruickshank recently stated that he "listens to shareholders and his mobile phone number is at the bottom of ASX announcements". We believe being pro-shareholder is about much more than giving out a mobile number. Being pro-shareholder is about managing the Company for the benefit of its shareholders and always placing their interests first - this is what it means to be a fiduciary. If Mr. Cruickshank truly places shareholder value and rights first and foremost, why did he unilaterally cancel the US$300 million asset sale after Antares' shareholders overwhelmingly approved it at January's extraordinary general meeting? Mr. Cruickshank claims he subsequently (and rather abruptly) gathered new positive information on these assets leading him to cancel the sale, right after the vote was conducted. Shouldn't shareholders have been given the full information Mr. Cruickshank claims led him to cancel the sale? Our experts have examined all public disclosure made by Antares during this period and believe there is no new material news. Shouldn't shareholders have been allowed to vote on whether or not the sale should go through in light of any material changes rather than Mr. Cruickshank deciding this for us? Also, and most importantly, it appears Mr. Cruickshank's ultimate plan was to keep the cash at Antares so he could reinvest it - he NEVER had a plan to sell the Company outright or to sell the assets and return any cash to shareholders. We believe this is why Antares' stock price only rose to a high of $0.58 per share after the asset sale announcement in June 2013 versus the $1+ value per share implied by the theoretical US$300 million proceeds. In our view, a truly shareholder-oriented CEO would have completed the sale for US$300 million, paid off the Company's debts, and then returned the balance in cash ($1+ per share in this case) to the shareholders. We believe that we, as shareholders, are capable of deciding what is in our own best interest when material transactions are involved. We find it VERY telling that Mr. Cruickshank never offered to let shareholders decide if they wanted the cash returned to them at the January shareholder meeting. We have come to the conclusion that the right way to think about Antares -- as it is currently structured -- is that it isn't really a proper oil and gas company – rather, it is Mr. Cruickshank's fully-controlled, personal private equity fund. He buys and sells assets, but shareholders never see any cash. Mr. Cruickshank claims Lone Star Value is seeking control without paying a