focusIR May 2024 Investor Webinar: Blue Whale, Kavango, Taseko Mines & CQS Natural Resources. Catch up with the webinar here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
do we know why?
He's gone from here too.
Happy to hold here and in Val.The Incoming Val deal looks nailed on and imminent which can only be good news for holders here.Onward and Upward-it’s been a while lol.
Well not only that, but also the sliding share price. Do you have any views on the fact Merck are using Artios for ddr Truro? Why is it that they chose them instead of PYC?
Share4. Your19:13 - they have you in common!
Wyeowye. Your first question - nobody knows for a fact why. Your 2nd sentence. You are factually correct. Que?
Just here and DMTR truro, wonder what they have in common
Trurotrader & Riddler, if there is a strong pipeline why have daily share trades reduced to a trickle and the SP is now about 60% of what is was a few weeks ago?
The fact is that this company continues to makes losses, income (from all the pipeline) is insufficient to cover costs and it’s a very small fish in a very big pond …….
Poor share4 . Your 10:49. Oh dear, so sad. Is that what happens to you. Abused, filtered , reported and on other sites as well!! You say some people never learn - seems you're the same.
oh yes, riddler posts misleading information and has several posts in the archive in breach of fca regulations. report me.
"record revs" - small increase on a small amount of revenue
"business pipeline and outline" - meaningless until it materialises
VAL201 hasn't materialised yet, strongly predicted by the poster below to have landed by now.
But what you really can't argue with is the dire performance of the share price of this stock this year.
And this is what you get on here, no response to the points raised, abuse, filtered and reported. Same thing happened at DMTR. These people never learn.
Two more pointless posts. You made a rhetorical question. No point in that. Again you have assumed my emotion re PYC and I care not about you and rooftops. The green box of history awaits you.
Kind of strange really if I was excited about a product I would be shouting the growth prospects from the rooftop...
And still no actual answers to the original question
Your 16:22 We all know that. So what on earth was the point of your post?
However what it does do is make your 16:20 a combination of confusion and rubbish. Your posts boil down to irrelevance.
As far as the accounts go, revenue growth is low, and it makes a loss.
The expected answer, don't know/read the accounts, you're clueless etc. etc. Anything but some actual tangible details of the feasibility for generating income on this so called product
Share4. You need to get a grip with your questions to me. Basically they are pointless and irrelevant.
You ask me about margins. This is information held by the company and not in any accounts so ask the BoD.
The repeat business is itemized in various RNS's and Reports so read them and you will get your answer.
Growth is also in the accounts so again read them and you will get your answer.
Your very confused about where to get information. I'm beginning to wonder what the point of you posting is.
mwhen you've workIf youm s o Margins
How much repeat has it had, what are the margins, what's the growth? Do tell.
Share4 you’re clueless
Oh, it "will get repeat business". Inside knowledge? How much repeat has it had, what are the margins, what's the growth? Do tell.
Share4 - Your Fri 21.21 No you didn't need to respond re reoccurring revenue. In fact, to be fair, it was a waste of time you raising it in the first place - haven't got a clue why you did.
Your Fri 21.25. Re 'reoccurring revenue' see above.
Your Fri 21.21 Re 'reoccurring revenue' see above.
Your Fri 21.25 Don't think you quite understand the product. It is 'Virtual Tumor' and it is trademarked. It has a myriad of forms. It has a myriad of uses. Consequently it will get repeat business. Repeat business is really good business. It is more efficient than new business. You both know each other and your respective strengths and get straight to the point.
I hope nothing in this post confuses you.
It's a little bit hard to respond to someone who doesn't appear to understand the difference between recurring revenue on a single product which is sold to many companies, and repeat business for which you have to undertake a new project every time, hence why this company has an extremely low revenue for a 15 year old listed company and can't even make a profit.
Wait did I need to respond to those points? Recurring revenue, on what? Repeat business about as impressive as my newsagents, yes, 15 years to get to 1 million turnover.
share4. You are confused about posters and also confused about the difference between a prediction that had variables and the difference with a factual statement. Few of your recent posts concern the company but appear to massage your own ego by denigrating various posters. I'm still waiting for a response about your comment that the company didn't have reoccurring revenue and you said that repeat business was as impressive as your local newsagent. Your post Wed 16.55. I said that newsagents thrive on that and in fact the company seemed to think it was a good thing. Why did you bring up reoccurring revenue or were you confused again.
Any way why don't you try to be relevant re PYC stop being a pain about other posters and, as a bonus, you might be less confused.!