London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
there is an article in today's sunday times.it is behind a paywall ,so i'm not able to access it.if it contains anything of interest and anyone dan post details it would be appreciated.
When an 18-year-old Shawn Fanning launched Napster, the service famed for taking music piracy mainstream, in June 1999, the top song on the Billboard charts was Livin’ la Vida Loca. Mercifully, Ricky Martin’s ditty has long since faded into history. Napster, however, just won’t die.
Matt Zhang, a 37-year-old New York banker turned crypto investor, bought it in May, turning his $1bn investment firm Hivemind into the company’s fifth owner since the music industry bankrupted the business in 2002 under a mountain of lawsuits.
Zhang’s plan: to turn Napster into “a music super-app” for the “post-streaming era”. What does that actually mean? By transforming into an online concert venue, where people can attend virtual shows and buy digital swag from their favourite bands, paid for in a forthcoming Napster cryptocurrency.
Napster will, of course, still offer streaming. The company, which is based in London and was listed on the Aim exchange until Zhang scooped it up, has millions of people who pay $10 a month to listen to music. It is a distant competitor, however, to the powerhouses of Apple and Spotify. In the six months through last June — the company’s last set of public accounts — Napster lost £14 million on £33 million in sales.
Zhang’s bet is that more than 20 years after Napster launched the streaming era, the industry is once again at the cusp of a huge shift in its core business model, this time driven by the emergence of decentralised blockchain technology that enables a more direct relationship between artists and fans, and lubricated by digital currencies. “We’re not unique at all. There’s many better investors in the music space out there. But I think the timing is unique,” Zhang said. “The next paradigm shift of the music industry is in front of us.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Last week he hired British music executive Jon Vlassopulos as Napster’s new chief executive.
Vlassopulos was previously at Roblox, where he set up a music operation at the $22bn gaming giant. Amid Covid lockdowns, Vlassopulos lured top names such as the rapper Lil Nas X, who netted more than $10m selling digital goods to fans who attended a virtual concert he performed on the platform.
Zara Larsson, the Swedish pop star, brought in more than $1m selling outfits and customisable avatars inside Roblox. She told the BBC that to make a similar sum via, say, Spotify, “would take a long, long time and hundreds and millions of streams”. She added: “Streaming services don’t pay the most.”
It is impossible to overstate the seismic effect Naspter had on the music industry. Overnight, every song imaginable was free to download. Record labels and artists, led by Metallica’s Lars Ulrich and rapper Dr Dre, kneecapped Napster, but not the digital music revolution it unleashed.
What ensued was a painful, 20-year journey to regain what was lost. Recorded music revenues plunged from $24 billion in 2001 to $14.2 billion in 2014, and have since come roaring back, hitting $25.9 billion in 2021, the first year that industry sales surpassed the 2001 figure.
Yet discontent with the new system is boiling over. Last year artists including Sir Paul McCartney, Emile Sandé and Paul Weller, of The Jam, wrote to Boris Johnson demanding a regulatory overhaul. They claimed they were being “exploited”: musicians receive about 15 per cent of the income from streaming, with the rest being split among the streaming platforms and record labels. The musicians called for new laws to force streaming platforms and record labels to more evenly split revenues.
The question is whether Napster, a relic from another era, can be the vehicle to drive the next upheaval. For anyone over the age of 30, the brand resonates. For younger people, it will mean little or nothing. The younger generations will be far more familiar, however, with cryptocurrency and the concept of decentralised services that allow creators to connect directly with fans with digital items such as NFTs (non-fungible tokens) and virtual experiences.
It is up to Vlassopulos to thread that needle. More than $35 billion has been spent on digital items in the last two years, he said, but most of it has been on digital art or on digital sports highlights. Music has been a laggard. “If I put a gun to your head and said, ‘Name ten digital artists’. You’d probably die,” Vlassopulos said. “But if I said name ten musical artists, you’d live. We think there is a big opportunity to cut into that $35 billion. ”
much appreciated snapuae.thanks very much.