Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Ignore the bit about helium. That's running out. They will be forced to use hydrogen.
"Transport accounts for almost a quarter of all greenhouse gas emissions generated by humankind: marine cargo delivery accounts for at least 3% and is projected to grow."
" Assuming such a behemoth could make 25 deliveries a year, a fleet of 1,125 lighter-than-air supertankers could deliver enough energy stored in the form of hydrogen to account for a tenth of the global electricity consumption."
Hydrogen is the future and that is most easiliy obtained from methane.
You can't do this with other fuels. It's the only viable option for airships. (It was the skin that caught fire in the Hinderberg btw and many survived, unlike plane crashes)
https://climatenewsnetwork.net/airships-return-can-boost-hydrogen-economy/
https://www.amazon.com/Paradise-Destroyed-Destruction-Living-Energy/dp/0990594335
https://www.amazon.com/Wind-Farm-Scam-Independent-Minds/dp/1905299834
https://theecologist.org/2017/apr/10/no-drax-theres-nothing-sustainable-about-big-biomass
Well, that's okay because we can always force the govt to to inspect nuclear power plants for radiation leaks that have been causing leukaemiafor decades, force an inquiry into the logic of shredding whole North American forests into woodchips to feed Drax and force them to admit that wind power has higher maintainence costs than it saves in CO2. As for solar, we can go on about Chinese slave labour, the fact that carbon is used to make solar panels and the toxic waste that pollutes river systems (includes cadmium telluride, copper indium selenide, cadmium gallium (di)selenide, copper indium gallium (di)selenide, hexafluoroethane, lead, and polyvinyl fluoride. Silicon tetrachloride, a byproduct of producing crystalline silicon, is also highly toxic. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.558.4686&rep=rep1&type=pdf)
It has been so long since the government called in this appeal decision for it to decide, and ripped it from the hands of the planning inspectorate which had held hearings in January 2019 following written submissions in September 2018. They said they would decide by April 2020 then put it back due to covid. Dare I hope that the civil service get this out ahead of August ? A lot of decisions are bunged out last week of July.