PYX Resources: Achieving volume and diversification milestones. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Ah well, excitement over!
Taffy’s text was the supporting doc. The receipt document was an actual till receipt for the $1,000 paid.
Morning All,
It was just the covering correspondence enclosing the payment.
Hopefully something for us to pick through
I thought that Ivy but wasn’t sure when doc 51 arrived
Hi taffy I see document 51 has also appeared “response (non motion)” is this the doc you posted last night or a different one? As 2 docs are now showing, receipt and also response
Thanks taffy for sharing the information unlike some who know people who know people that know.
GLA
Nobody checked this fella out on LinkedIn, may not be him, but an accountant at an automotive business in the states, you couldn't make it up if true lol.
BWTFDIK :-)
It’s confirmation that they have paid the $1000 fine....cheque paid by the lawyers!
My name is William DeClercq. I am over the age of eighteen (18) and competent to give this Declaration. I am one of Plaintiffs’ counsel of record in this action and have personal knowledge of all matters set forth herein. This Declaration is given pursuant to the Court’s June 19, 2019 Sanctions Order Against Plaintiffs and Their Counsel (DE 47) (the “Sanctions Order”), and for all other purposes permitted by law. 2. On July 17, 2019, the Clerk of Court received my firm’s check in the amount of $1,000.00 as satisfaction of the sanctions issued by the Court in the Sanctions Order. Attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is a copy of receipt number 34611143652 from the Clerk of Court evidencing proof of this payment. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: July 18, 2019. /s/ William DeClercq William DeClercq -2- DECLARATION OF WILLIAM DECLERCQ
It refers Response re 47......that was the sanctions document