Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
come on England sweet ! ;-)
MrMarkyB
The chat on the share has not ended.
I imagine that it has taken a break until we have new information to discus.
For example, Echo might want to take a different take on how much they tell us about the Santa Cruz assets?
They may wish to update us on the proposed Workovers of Santa Cruz wells.
They may wish to tell us whether they are going to cut costs, across the Santa Cruz portfolio?
It may be that they can find a way of increasing production from the Estate without doing harm?
They might find a way of telling us why it was a surprise that the top of the Springhill was not where they thought it was.
And why was that? Was the original seismic inaccurate? Did no one think to do a new seismic before drilling CLix-1001?
And given that we now have misleading seismic on all of Palermo Aike, what are the ramifications?
For example, does that mean that the CPR that was the basis of our purchase of the Santa Cruz assets, be not worth the paper that it was written on. Note that may be in a good way, but might we need to do a new seismic survey? And at whose expense?
The Petreven H-205 drilling rig has now finished operations for us in Palermo Aike, will it now next be tasked to the West of Tapi Aike to drill our first well there?
And I find it frustrating that the website maps/info on Santa Cruz are minimalist and totally lacking detail.
If Echo wish to attract new investors or even retain the ones that they have, substantial effort is required to demonstrate their willingness to engage??!??
And given that Echo advised that of last Monday, the testing of CLix-1001 in Palermo Aike had yet to begin.
And it might be well to be aware that this will be a simple inflow test.
If not successful, they may deem it appropriate to fracture?
So we might get results from the inflow test at CLix-1001 within 3 weeks?
If they then wish to fracture the well, they may have to plan that operation, if they have not already?
And once equipment and materials mobilised, maybe another month for results?
So potentially, no holding of breath down in Santa Cruz???
So plenty to get stuck into there!
O/T
A miserable result in Cardiff, not assisted by a dropped "Gary Owen" and an interception - the fault fairly and squarely at our own door!! We deserved no less.
A decent enough win for Scotland in Rome.
Ireland at HQ might be a long day for whoever wins. Heavy rain this morning might mean a heavy pitch with 14 mph winds.
When I see how often the TV pundits get their predictions utterly @rse about face, all that I will hope for is an entertaining game. But all the players will want is to WIN! Enter stage right Owen and Andrew Farrell!! lol
WT
Well it looks like the chat on the share ended now, poor show from echo, very reminiscent of the last few years. Will come back if we have any good news or something to whinge at!
Will leave you to the wine and port chat.
trellis35
I did not post on a GB Fino, it was the GB Matusalem Oloroso that is terrific.
Just hoping that there was no misunderstanding.
WT
Just looking at the chat on the bad luck shares, you know which ones I mean.
Have a Taylors First Estate port from xmas present time. guaranteed to help with sleeplessness from big losses..
Keep up the good work with SAG Trellis.
trellis35
The Madeira Company that is most generally available is Blandy's.
Tesco stock Blandy's Duke of Clarence Madeira at £12.50 per bottle.
It is full and rich but not too heavy.
I don't drink Madeira normally, but if I am making a Madeira sauce to go with a beouf-en-croute, I will have a cheffy sip!?!lol
I do subscribe to the theory that one should never cook with a wine that you were not prepared to drink yourself.
Port, Madeira, Sherry, Sauternes & Barsac are out of fashion, so they are great bargains currently.
Some years ago, I found an amazing 100 year old sherry for a friends Christmas present. Cost £14!!
If you want an incredible after dinner tipple, then go no further than Gonzalez Byass Matusalem Oloroso.
Not cheap at £20 per half bottle, not easy to find but well worth the trouble. Once tasted, never EVER forgotten.
WT
WT
bskiny1
The Tesco website says that the current Tesco finest Vintage Port is from the 2007 vintage. This was an excellent vintage year marked 95/100.
The 2009 vintage marked 90/100, so good but no better. This seems to be the one that you purchased and maybe the 2007 at Tesco sold out and they are now on to the 2009.
The Port vintage to look out for when released is 2011. That is rated at around 97/100.
All of these scores are general vintage quality, some wines may be better, some not so much.
I bought a shedful of the Taylors 1994, that's enough for me.
From the current Tesco range, I would have gone for the Grahams Malvedos Single Quinta Port 2005, not a great year but Graham's do NOT KNOW how to make a bad port. Last Christmas Tesco had a terrific Dow's VP for £20 per bottle. If you like VP, buy at a years worth Christmas, that is where the bargains are to found.
Taylors Single Quinta is Vargellas, if ever you see that one at a decent price, snap it up!
Hope this helps.
WT
I got some Tesco finest Vintage Port 2009 a good year I believe .Anybody tasted it.