Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
So 4to1 consolidation ,list on some little us market,give us a break Peter ,those loyal investors are wanting to sell.Any hope?
http://www.danielstewart.co.uk/daniel-stewart-launches-new-cfd-service/
Register on Blueshare & verify you are a DAN shareholder to one of the admins & you will gain access to the private forum area.
Hi Rollinhand Where is the right place to look ?
Depends if you look in the right places ;)
no signs of life that i'm aware of.
Is anything happening of any comfort to shareholders?
I don't recall any discussion around a Shareholder Action Group, but sounds like a good idea GrumpyScouser!
Has there been any discussion of forming one in order to 'encourage' the company into communication with PI's? http://www.sharesoc.org/Shareholder%20Action%20Groups.pdf
no, doesn't seem to address that issue one way or the other. it seems to be a rather long-winded way of announcing that rob terry and friends think that there may be money to be made by getting into the crowd-funding lark, & so they will be setting up a section of qpe supposedly dedicated to that. ...peter shea from DAN is invited into the QPE board in the meanwhile... (good to keep close to you those who know where some bodies are buried?) ? presumably there might be an intention to use interest in crowd-funding as a mechanism at some stage to let them issue more shares in DAN, by permitting eager beaver crowd-funders to take part in some DAN wizard wheeze? - with QPE then using the crowd-funded price as a way to try to claim a higher book value on its existing DAN stake? that's just me speculating. RT has twists & turns like a python. meanwhile, quob seems to be lowering the minimum amount needed for pis who want to buy into quob shares.
Does this latest news mean DS is going to be re-listed and if so where? Back on AIM or elsewhere?
Look at Daniel Stewart web site. Also sets out 'their view'. Interesting!
note that epsilon have charges held over the company assets (i think all of them?) registered at companies house [as per recent share puppets update]. so if DAN does default/go into administration, even though epsilon's shares would be wiped out, it seems that they would then become the owners of the entire company anyway ... ... so epsilon might actually quite like the idea of company going into administration? ... i don't know what that would mean for RT; perhaps depends what link he has with epsilon?- if any, lol.
Thanks Guesstimation. But with RT holding 9% (?) DAN shares and other big share holders as well, the company may not go into administration otherwise it will nullify their shares as well, and the big players that they are, they must be looking at ways to protect their investments.
As long as there is no administration of the company, if the company lists again, your shares will be valid at w/e the market decides. It is possible for them to put the company in administration, nullify the old shares and relist again later through. See GAME
What is the value of shares that some of us still hold with Dan? Will they become valid if/when Dan is listed again somewhere and starts trading, and at what value, and therefore still have a worth for as long as Dan as a company exists. Or are they useless as whenever Dan starts trading again they will issue new shares and the old shares will have zero value? Any suggestions/ideas?
but what's it got to do with the FCA? putting money into a tiny, micro-cap AIM stock like this is inherently v. risky. very very often the punter will lose. so why should anyone care that much about rich pis who knew that risk but placed a bet on shares anyway? ... only really get much sympathy, & FCA interest, if there was some kind of fraud, dishonesty, etc. (mind, it might be interesting one day to see what Serious Fraud Office conclude in the end about the various parties involved in the QPP debacle, but it's not public as yet which parties are most under their microscope.)
So no listing on aim again.No one cares about pi,s who have lost monay with this outfit,where is the F C A?I have 100000 shares available if Qpe would like to buy them at175 a share.
well, good luck if you decide to pursue such a route. i'm not sure how much specific there has actually been specifically promised that didn't happen. company saying vague things like it 'expects' , 'will explore options', 'will seek to', 'as soon as possible' etc. leaves enough room for a bus to drive through. that's why they are worded that way, sadly. anyway, best of luck here and elsewhere.
Not too sure Spikeyk but may be a few things that the legal experts could find useful. For instance the company failing to publish its annual report and accounts leading to suspension on October 1 (RNS October 1) RNS October 23 - ".....the Company continues to work on the funding package to allow it to publish its FY 2015 Accounts and resume trading on AIM. The Company is making progress on the funding package and expects to announce its conclusion shortly" - But this never happened RNS December 21 - "The Company will seek to identify a replacement Nomad, however, if no replacement Nomad can be found within the given time frame, the Board will explore options to either join another market, and/or to put in place a matched bargain facility to enable Shareholders to trade." But nothing to date on either another market, or a matched bargain facility. RNS Januay 15 - "However, should the shares of the Company become delisted from AiM the Board will examine alternative mechanism's to facilitate trading in the Company's shares , including a potential future relisting. Full details would be circulated as soon as possible.". However, nothing since January 15 (amost 4 months) on any alternative mechanisms. A legal experts may find something relevant from the above and other RNSs for a possible litigation on the grounds of the company misleading its share holders by continuously building false hopes.
on what grounds? ... if you think there has been some kind of fraud, or misrepresentation, then i guess litigation an option tho' evidential burden can be very tricky. or some other kind of wrong-doing. but legal action not really a viable option if it's just about a company that hasn't actually managed to trade very effectively. obviously, one of the points about AIM shares is that they tend to carry higher risk than most main market companies, and are subject to fewer regulatory requirements. now that DAN is off AIM, even less requirements on them. did you have something in particular in mind that you think the company may have been at fault about? gl.
Thanks Spikeyj. For those of us who held shares with Dan until the end have no choice but to wait and see when (if) they get back on trading, but for now the shares have zero value. Is legal action at all an option in such cases?
they are still in business. just not listed on AIM now.
But isn't Terry still holding on to his shares in Dan? The last RNS before delisting on January 19/20 said that his share portion has been increased to 9% or something. So if Terry is still holding, as well as some other share holders should there not be more hope that Dan will get back in business at some point?