Rainbow Rare Earths Phalaborwa project shaping up to be one of the lowest cost producers globally. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Why do you think CTEA can beat Netcompany to the vaccine passport app market?
Have you seen one single press article or release to say that CTEA specifically has a "vaccine passport app" ready to go? I haven't.
And do you seriously think CTEA, an AIM company with no signficant staff or offices and no revenue producing contracts, can compete with a company like Netcompany:-
https://www.netcompany.com/en-GB
or with the UK NHS app, which is already being worked on to become a vaccine passport app IF the UK decides it is needed.
As regards an international travel passport app, CTEA are not in the running for that anywhere. Every major airline in the world is already adaptingand testing their own online check-in apps to securely hold vaccination and/or test result details, plus paper copies will be accepted as a back up anyway.
CTEA's only hope for any contract related to vaccine apps will be with private companies who want secure admittance to their offices for their staff. But companies will not adopt anything unless they are legally obligated to, and there are many offices that already have staff back working in them without using any admittance apps.
CTEA were ahead of the market on this a year ago, but basically did not have the selling skills to get anywhere with it.
History repeating itself Mitch, as same happed with Milestone Blockchain Music Publishing Platform!!
Mitch - this is a Danish company and nothing to do with U.K. gov consultation - CTEA Catenae on the other hand WERE involved, are a British company and consulted by U.K. GOV Dept of Health from the perspective of a FUTURE SERVICE PROVIDER.
Here’s Guy the CEO to explain how their secure ready to go GDPR compliant ISO awarded APP underpinned by blockchain technology works -
https://www.catenaeinnovation.com/interviews
I suspect many on here are trying to talk this down now it’s been announced that Covid ‘Passport’ App is happening...
IMHO DYOR GLA
Sharebel - "CTEA are a British company and consulted by U.K. GOV Dept of Health " is totally misleading.
CTEA was not "consulted by" any goverment department. As DG73 says below "It was an open consultation. CTEA weren’t specifically asked personally, all companies in this sector were asked to participate."
I am not talking CTEA down. There may be a market for their app with private companies. However all these posts connecting CTEA with countrywide/government passport apps, whether domestic or international, is just pie in the sky.
Mitch ‘pie in the sky’ really - complete talk down *******s. There is only one other ‘competitor’ system that uses blockchain secure tech (in 2021 mist secure and preferred ledger technology) and they haven’t got a ready to go app. I’m not sure why you post on here if you’ve no belief in CTEA. As I’ve said many times, we are not simply focused on contract with NHS England/Wales - globally this will be rolled out for international travel and other countries will require for their citizens quickly - no time to develop from scratch which is where we can hit the ground running. We also could provide for PH Scotland. We can also provide for businesses and individual events globally. Time is of the essence for opening up global travel and economies. We need this to be up and working in weeks not years. We can do that NOW.
Plus I’ve done my own research and it’s wholly misleading to suggest Netcompany in running when in fact their input was months ago, contract ended and was a very specific small Covid testing project.
IMHO DYOR GLA
I’d also add...netcompany is Bluetooth based - now that’s a big lol (blockchain is most secure ledger technology obviously) and even their Danish version for their gov is still being developed. It’s a totally different kettle of fish ...a red herring!
IMHO DYOR GLA
Mitch - do you actually own any shares in CTEA? If you do why don't you just sell and move on given that all you post about the company is negative. I can't understand why anyone would have such a derisory viewpoint if he/she was a shareholder as it's counter-productive from whichever way you look at it.
Mitch is just on here speaking sense, to balance out the many posts that only take into account the absolute best case scenario and usually mislead.
I see a lot of comments about 'our amazing tech' but none of you actually know about this tech. No-one does. Not me, not you, not anyone outside their 3 man band. No one knows about the infrastructure the tech runs on, nobody has even seen this world changing app. So to invest in CTEA based on a man's comments in interviews who, over a year ago, was proved to elaborate the truth is a massive gamble. The fact that no-one has agreed to pay for the product in over a year should tell you all you need to know about it. Blockchain this vlockchsin that. You can buy blockchain off the shelf right now. Then it just takes a few tweaks to make it gdpr compliant. So if I me, a front end developer and someone who is familiar with blockchain got together, we'd have everything CTEA have to offer for a minimal outlay. In a month or so. CTEA don't even own the IP for the app.
Blaim - well it's good to see that you're confident enough to read his mind and speak on his behalf. But you don't really answer the question. I could find numerous examples of what I might see as dubious offerings on AIM but do I really want to waste my life posting comments on those boards simply to undermine the opinions of others when I have no financial interest in them myself. Everyone does everything ultimately to achieve a hoped for outcome. So repeatedly criticising a share in which you have no interest indicates to me some sort of personal grievance against the company or an effort to get others to sell and lower the price. And probably delusional on both accounts. If you can offer an alternative explanation then please do.
You have overlooked our collaboration with z/yen .
I wouldn't buy this company if it were 0.01p. They will never make any money. 17 years and counting they have accomplished naff all. I habe no motive other than to stop gullible people being sucked in my the fluff and sometimes blatant lies put out by this company and rampers posting here and on twitter. If I saw something that pointed to this company being anything other than a pure gamble then I'd admit it. And if someone if investing on they pretense then fine. Don't make it out like this is anything else than that though. If you do you're lying or deluded.
Blaim - so is it just this one AIM company that you provide your protect the gullible investor service on or do you cover them all.
Quite a job if you do them all given that investors tend to lose money on 70 per cent or so of AIM companies. Higher risk for higher reward. If it's just this one I'm wondering how you came to settle here - and whether you and Mitch one and the same.
I think it's quite obvious we're separate people but believe whatever you like Paul. It's of no concern to me. I am quite vocal about most obvious lifestyle companies on twitter. #ctea, #ukog, #prem and a few more.
Blaim - well your low number of posts to date on LSE suggests that you're not quite as vocal as you infer, or, that if you are you must have multiple aliases. Hmmmmm..........
Blaim...you may be right. You may be wrong. But you sound like a bitter former employee / contractor or colleague of one of the directors. Definitely a hint of personal grudge in the tone of your blanket criticism. Or perhaps you just rocked up here at random to "help out"? Yeah, right...
Paul
I have absolutely no problem with anyone taking a gamble on this share. As you rightly say "higher risk, higher reward". However I do post when I see a blatent mistruth being posted to ramp the share - like the statement that CTEA are in consulation with the government, when all they have done is contribute to an open forum.
I have said many times over the past year that investors can make money from ZIOC. It has always been a pump and dump share. Make your 40% and sell. However what you cannot deny is the CTEA have supposedly had a Covid app ready to go for over a year, and have not sold it to anybody, and that is why it is not a long term hold in my view.
All will be revealed in the next month anyway, as it will be clear by then which domestic covid passport apps will be approved and which international travel passport apps will be used by airlines and government borders.
I will quite happilly congratulate you then if you are right and CTEA announce a contract - as long as you also concede you were wrong if they still have not sold anything to anybody when the UK/international vaccine passport decisions are announced.
Deal?
Ignore the number of posts and I have not 'just rocked up'. I used to post under 'crizmo' but I have changed account on here as I was tired of people thinking they were Sherlock Holmes when they found my twitter handle (that I made not attempt to hide) so I now post under the same name as my twitter handle to avoid any confusion.
Mitch - I won't need to either concede or expect congratulations irrespective of the outcome as I haven't expressed views one way or another on the share. I simply see my investment as a risk against reward approach that could go either way. But I'm an adult responsible for my own choices as any investor should be. What I don't really get or appreciate is the people who seem to hang around to post constant negatives under the sanctimonious pretext of it apparently being somehow for the greater good.
Yet you never question the people who constantly ramp this stock? Massaging the truth is ok then is it? You'll only challenge people with a negative point of view?
Bitter former employee? The chances of that are about 1 in a million, seeing as this is a 2 bit company who currently have 3 staff from what I can tell. I doubt their numbers have ever been much higher. And why would anyone leave ctea? They're paid for doing practically nothing.
Blaim - I start from the principle that anyone who is positive about the company on here will have more than likely invested in it and it is therefore in their interests and their pysche to be positive. Why would I therefore criticise them. And ultimately I take what they say with a proverbial pinch of salt regardless as anyone else should. However those who are nothing but negative clearly have no investment here and are purely trying to be destructive for their own malicious reasons dressed up as some sort of moral crusade. The LSE boards are infected with them - it must be some sort of psychological disorder - either that or some sort of denial complex.
Positive posts, even when they're absolute nonsense or blatant lies are ok. Negative posts are from people with mental disorders. I get it now, thanks.
About as likely as you randomly alighting on this board with this much desire to talk the share down.
Social Media is full of people who get an endorphin rush from creating an argument - but most of them are psychologically invested in the issue at stake. Typically, they offer lots of polarised opinion but zero insight into the origin of the extremity of their sentiment. They always strike me as individuals unusually lacking in self awareness or deliberately seeking to mask their underlying motivation.
Or both.
"What I don't really get or appreciate is the people who seem to hang around to post constant negatives under the sanctimonious pretext of it apparently being somehow for the greater good."
But what about the people who post constant positives quoting blatent mistruths? Are they also apparently posting "for the greater good"?
This is a forum to post views on a particulat AIM share. Views can be positive or negative, but if you only allow positive posts then the forum just becomes a vehicle for ramping.
Its like the many posts on here this past two months claiming that CTEA are serious contenders for an ninternational travel app - without evidence (or even a statement from CTEA) to back that up - or any mention that there are dozens of other international passport apps already being trialed. Surely I (and other supposed derampers) have a right in an open forum to point that out and provide a link (as I did) to an article detailing all those other international vaccine apps?
Why should that not be allowed or be considered deramping, when a wildly inaccurate posts that CTEA are at the forefront of the international vaccine passport race be allowed to go unchallenged?
You are clearly very realistic with your investment in CTEA and realise it is a total gamble. However there have been angry posts on here over the past few months from inexperience investors who bought into the ramping hype, and have lost money. There would be even more of those if negative views were not allowed.
Its very easy to decry a negative post with "he's deamping", "he's getting people to sell so he can buy at a lower price", "he's not invested here" etc etc. Less easy to come up with positives about CTEA to counter those negative posts.
And I do have my reasons to post about CTEA. I have not randonly alighted on this board. If you check back in my posts going back several yearss to the Milestone days and though the blockchain days and the music industry days you will see why I comment on CTEA.