Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Hi Tiburn
Sorry pal, but you are wasting your time trying to get rid of "angela".
The more you chat to her, the better she likes it.
The only way, is to chuck her in your filter, and forget she even exists!
That's what I do!
But yourself, and others, keep reminding me that she is still out there, so that is why I am sending this very rare posting!
She was a 100% AAOG investor last year, she sold half her shares on 5th Sept 2018, but may have bought back in at a cheaper price.
On the 6th Jan 2019, she said this:-
"TLP-104 should show the same or better success as TLP 103 if that is the case a full field development programme should push the sp over the £1.00"
She also had the courage to say the following;-
"Anyone is welcome to sensibly destroy the above comments".
She wrote this piece on 7th Jan 2019:-
"I shall add some tomorrow a.m with a neutral view as a Djeno failure could drop the sp but a recommended target sp of 38p on existing information is good enough for term holding".
But somewhere down the line, I assume that she crashed out of AAOG, perhaps due to the delays caused by our BOD, and a busted oil rig, and probably lost some money!
If I am correct, "angela" is actually trying to wreck us to make up for her losses, and will probably continue with her unnecessary, and somewhat nasty posts.
She appears to be blaming us for the SP not getting to 38p, and then £1.00p
Considering that she was pumping up AAOG a few months ago, one may have to consider that there is something sadly wrong with our lady, and she should find an expert to help her with her AAOG problem.
Back in time, there was another lady, who bombarded a BB using the EXACT wording, spelling, paragraphs, and aggressive statements of our lovely angela.
The one big difference, is that "soniaP" (Who I prefer to call "Lady Sonia) chose to attack a company that had just been delisted, and had many investors with large sums of money trapped in this delisted company, and were very worried!
That did not bother "Lady Sonia", who behaved just like "angela" is behaving here!
The trapped money has still not been recovered.
"Lady Sonia" was not invested in the above mentioned share!
Is it possible that "angela" and "Lady Sonia" are the same persons?
I can only guess that "Lady Sonia" was eventually kicked off the BB by LSE, but I also believe that she joined up again with another similar type of name, with all the usual type of wording, etc, and pestered one other BB.
So "angela", if you do go and find someone to help you with your problem, would you please take your twin "Lady Sonia" with you, as she sadly has the same problem as you!
Strange as it might sound, but every time I watch the quiz show "The chase", I think that the big bossy lady on there, is our much loved angela!
It's time for me to put our TV celebrity lookalike back in the filter.
Good night all.
Kind regards
JP
Many will do all they can to make continued posting of troll falsehoods and sowing discontent on this board difficult for you Angela - claiming innocence in motive is just far to rich to stomach.
You have an troll agenda that is fully exposed.
And many here will continue to treat you with the utter contempt you deserve
If it means posting your comments from another board to expose your Troll behaviour here then so be it, it pales into insignificance compared to the blatant lies and manipulation of the truth you spew on this BB for your own personal gain.
Do you believe your own hype or deep down just chortle and hug yourself at your Machiavellian oh so clever machinations?
Don't assume that your behaviour is any way rational or can be condoned and that others should treat you with any sort of respect due a fellow poster with a different opinion. Negative opinions are fine, but you are just a troll with an agenda.
You remind me of some hard nosed business women, who give it out in spades, but then when there is push back, or bullying as you call it, start with the "oh please don't hassle, me I'm just a simple woman" angle and expect fair treatment, accuse the accuser, wait until the detractors back off, then start with the same mendacity again.
Kevin nobody like losing money and of course all that do are going to be unhappy.
If someone tried to dip our pockets in the street it is likely if we caught them they would be given a good slapping and everybody around would be angry at the thieves because they know it could equally have happened to them.
There are IDs on here who are doing their best with an online version of the very same thing, so there can be NO excuses for their behaviour. In fact I am surprised that so many people are just happy to watch it go on. Priests and Levites perhaps?
By all means discuss the positive negative aspects of a share but blatant misleading statements and repeating the same questions every hour of every day for months while ignoring any answers given is ridiculous.
I think the problem is that those of us up to our necks in this are now overly sensitive. I do agree that there is no place for continuous ****ging of a share if you have no material interest in it, but I feel strongly that shareholders should be able to post positive and negative. The fact is that if the oil is genuinely there, this share is oversold and people like Angela are doing a lot of damage by scaring small PI's. The Board has a lot to answer for and their incompetence and obfuscation is the real reason for the share price damage. Just look at ANGS today to see what happens to a share in trouble when they announce Board changes We need the same here!
I'm sorry Angela but you deserve what you get and others like you. You revel and make money off the back of others misfortune and smile whilst doing so.