Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPO. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Within all of this there were far more positive messages coming from the company and brokers.
You wouldn't expect the company to down play things, but I expected better from the brokers. Lesson learned there moving forward.
I think a lot of the bulls and especially the smooth talking ones went into retreat after the bond failure, for some it might have simply been a case of licking their wounds or waiting for the dust to settle.
"GK only pops up when he thinks it will suit his position. I agree he is not alone, but his knowledge and persuasive writing style is more dangerous than most - a wolf in sheeps clothing".
Totally agree.
The wheat chaff is harder to distinguish when a poster has groomed a cult following with intellectual style of posting, then comes a subtle bias/suggestion... possible sting.
Yes, we are all responsible for the decisions we make. Sometimes, ones decision making can be clouded by views of a 'trusted' poster.
Hi Longtermview
I'm a novice first time investor, I've put a few £14,000 in without doing any real research ( my fault ) I just read what the company said and all the positives, I had no idea about no funding for stage 2 I did not even know there was a stage 2, I cannot believe I'm only numpty who did not either.
What I want to say is inexperienced investors like me will appreciate your posts and not the rampers de-rampers who talk Shxte all the time, and it is easy to spot them.
Like I said I'm a Numpty who believed the hype about this project but still feel it will come good eventually, if not I only have to look in the mirror to find blame.
All the best to you and other decent Investors.
HTB
I think you're struggling with the concept of a thread.
"I note you didn't answer why it is that people who think this stock is a dog feel the need to post ad infinitum on the subject. "
What ? Eh? Why would I ? Why do I need to ?
You seem to have an issue with GK that stretches back a long time. Blaming him in the past for being optimistic, I defended him.
You seem to be grasping at things to lash out at.
I don't care whether you're positive neutral or negative.
My point is that if it is widely understood and acknowledged that there is an agenda to a particular person's post, so all may not be as it appears, then it's fair enough to bring that to the boards attention. No more no less.
I note you didn't answer why it is that people who think this stock is a dog feel the need to post ad infinitum on the subject. I'm invested in only a few stocks. I could list hundreds I wouldn't invest in. Why would I bother posting on a stock that I think is a dog? Why would anybody? Surely they should have better things to do - or is there an ulterior and/or sinister motive. And if you have an ulterior or sinister motive, then would it be fair to assume that you would post whatever you could to destabilise the stock, whether it is based on fact or fiction. It's for these reasons that I take the bashers contributions with a large dose of salt.
I agree that rampers that post price projections and general hyperbole, without any substance, are equally culpable. But an investor who has done their research is easily able to see through the cheerleaders who lack any kind of research or substance to their posts.
As I said, it's a wheat and chaff game here and it's not that difficult to tell them apart, but tedious nonetheless that sifting is required and good posts can often get overlooked or buried in the detritus.
Yes 100% agree.
"people are happy to be led rather than do their own research "
I think the purpose of a bb is for collective opinions ?
I'm neutral on this stock at the moment.
"but his knowledge and persuasive writing style is more dangerous than most "
People are happy to be led rather than doing their own research and those who prevent the most convincing case are more likely to be followed, so what do we do ban posters than make a convincing argument? Dumb things down?
Not Salty at all Slums and not made any wrong decision. If or until they turn out the lights, the investment proposition, clearly articulated in the latest presentation and conf call, remains - and I remain (very substantially) invested.
GK only pops up when he thinks it will suit his position. I agree he is not alone, but his knowledge and persuasive writing style is more dangerous than most - a wolf in sheeps clothing.
I'm here to learn from the collective FACTUAL knowledge that's contributed by a small number of posters, and also to be alerted to publications/analysis that posters find that cover the company; contractors and/or substantial investors, which is all very helpful to understanding whether this remains a good investment proposition or not.
The vast majority, unfortunately, are keyboard warriors that have nothing useful to contribute. If you think the company is a sham, a fake and/or the project is a pipe dream, fair enough but why feel the need to "save" us poor investors. That I don't get. There are hundreds of company's I wouldn't touch with a bargepole. I have neither the time nor the inclination to post on those boards to save the world.
It doesn't take long to sort the wheat from the chaff. No prizes for guessing which camp you're in.