London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East and have access to Premium Chat. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Bermuda ... i just cannot get it to read how your are trying to explain it ...lol so i will leave it at that ...
lets see if the English bowlers can save the day ....
Well I asked the question, you gave an answer. I agree.
I just get the impression, as you have over different issues, that that will not suffice, but it would me. Thamks.
Have another read and note the comma after the word 'negative'.
ie; When I said ' being unreasonable, negative, after a short term trade '
after means seeking, looking for NOT at a later time
The joys of internet communicaton.
Let’s hope someone from Scancell is looking in and can manage a copy and paste!
I think one of the issues of the BB is the failure to acknowledge the impact of time. After all, it is the time elapsed between communications that some are complaining about. As they say, time is money. The more time passes, the more money is needed, the greater the dilution and a lower percentage return. Also, the more time that passes, the greater the likelihood of a competitor technology.
Regarding SCIB1, assuming the trial is on hold, I'd say something along the lines of:-
'The SCIB1 clinical trial has been placed on hold in order to protect patients and allow NHS resources to be diverted to dealing with COVID-19. Whilst patients have been screened for suitability to join the SCIB1 trial, none have yet been dosed and therefore, fortunately the hold placed on this trial will have no adverse impact on data integrity or continuity. We continue to plan to ensure that as soon as clinical trials are able to resume we are best placed to resume the study as quickly as possible. To this end, we will be opening 3 additional trial centres in Oxford, Cardiff and Northwood. '
In other words this is the issue, this is the impact and this is what we're doing about it. A positive coming out of a negative situation.
I get a return from property .. but cant see much capital growth for a year or two in that market
back to Ludicrously cheap .... Scancell
ISA tax free
Capital growth when ever
The Science tells me it will be commercial ...
happy to buy from folks that want to sell ....
admin appear to have spotted Micheal ... post removed
“Ruck i am happy with a low sp .. “
Well I’m not.
How long will you be happy with a low SP? Surely you want to see a return at some point?
Ray ... Holder ... devastating ...
Ruck i am happy with a low sp ..
however i don't bias my posts to lower the SP ..
back to Bermuda
try another way which poster ( post the post please ?? ) has demonstrated that somebody is Unreasonable is negative after a trade . so you must also be referring to a poster who has sold .... ? who is that on the receiving end .. ?
that is how it sounds ...
No confusion from me Bermuda, i too would love to her as many updates as possible, but for example what would Scancell say with regards to SCIB1 and MOD1 trials to show us we are in a strong position to weather the storm???
Without raising funds, and short of a deal with Avidamab to negate any need for a raise, what is there to add to we are not in trials??
It very much fits the context, any questioning of the company in any way that could be construed negative brings accusations of being a trader, wanting the price lower or not understanding the science. As Bermuda says, that could not be further from the truth.
“ but I'm getting a strong message from this bb that those who would like an update are somehow being unreasonable, negative, after a short term trade and that they don't understand the science or potential of Scancell. That could not be further from the case. ”
Spot on! As always politely put and well articulated.
not trying to make a point .. it did not seem to fit in context
Thanks for considered response C7.
You may not believe me but I not a trader by choice and much more comfortable being an “ investor” as I don’t normally have time to watch the screens and TBF I am not very good at it as don't really understand market mechanics, TA etc.
Of course like most others you can possibly predict how an SP is going to move on news or sentiment but the key bit is the “ entry point” and if you get that right you normally do OK.
As for here like yourself I keep a core holding and then traded some if the occasion demanded.In some cases I made money and on other occasions I lost but I don’t subscribe to the view that it is only a loss if you sell.
If your average is 15p and you sell at 10p to me that is much better than not selling and waiting until the price drops to 5p which has been the long term trend here over the last few years.
The thing that has altered to me is the proportion of my position in my core as opposed to the amount I was happy to trade and that has changed enormously over the Katz 12-18 months.
I adjust it according about how I feel are the prospects here and elsewhere and consider that is a sensible approach but each to their own.
I do not want the SP to drop down here but if it does then like others I may look to trade but that is the opportunity has come to me.
None of what any of us says on a BB will influence the SP and yes I would prefer more updates not because I want the SP lower as some insinuate but because I want to make informed decisions about my investment here.
What do you mean? What point are you trying to make?
why is that in the sentence ? ATB
""after a short term trade ""
There seems to be some confusion over this update/communication issue. This isn't about getting answers to detailed questions, it's about Scancell reassuring shareholders that they have identified potential areas of risk, have strategies in place to mitigate any impact and are in a strong position to weather the storm.
We are in unprecedented and very uncertain times and shareholders are looking to companies to demonstrate that they are proactively managing their companies through this crisis.
This is a general point and not addressed to you at all Chelsea, but I'm getting a strong message from this bb that those who would like an update are somehow being unreasonable, negative, after a short term trade and that they don't understand the science or potential of Scancell. That could not be further from the case.
IMO of course.
Bad news England 158-8
So news on the science front
1) 2 further explanations of Scancell's science with more detail. It shows the research is continuing. I would not think otherwise
2) Then we had the good news that problems with the 3rd Modi1 conjugate had been solved. Hopefully that signals that Modi1 manufacturing problems are all sorted. They still have to unite the 3 conjugates though.
3) News that Lindy is researching a Covid19 vaccine with associated proof courtesy of Sky News (Lindy with her 20 year old Scancell lab coat on peering into an electron microscope). We could do with news that Dominic Cummings is reading up on T Cells LOL.
We can't complain about that. On other non-science news ask Cliff. I'm sure he will answer any questions he is able to.
Ray, so true. The vast majority of communication complaints involves price sensitive information, which even asking the company will never be answered. We actually did get a couple of RNSs late end June, publication highlights for both MOD1 and Avidamab, it is just the news released as updates is not the type of news traders choose IMHO
Yes, but if you really want to know something and the BB hasn't got the answer, then the obvious course of action is to ask the company.
You can sometimes discuss missing information ad infinitum on the BB without getting anywhere.
Perhaps best not to take these little spats too seriously, it's just one of many BB's and this BB is a great source of information from many sides. I am biased slightly in one direction but I do read most posts which does provide me with a balance sometimes, all good IMO.
Well it is just good to hear different views, the AIM market is so driven by news, and the opinions between traders and investors are often very different.
The RNS re COVIDITY was an ideal RNS for traders first, but what kind of update can the company release unles they have a fundraise to announce?? And is it not the same for our SCIB1 and MOD1 trial, what kind of update can we expect unless a definitive timeline can be given??
Ivy, by your own definition, you are a trader of AIM stocks, and also you have been stating the case for more updates more vocifically than most, but again by your own admission you have been trading this share very well the last few months, if as you say we are forced to second guess on key issues, some I agree with, on what basis with lack of news do you manage to trade this share so well.???
I ask because, one reason being, I too have made 4 good trades out of five since February, and have done so on the information given and like most shares what we can reasonably expect.
i will look for you in Church .. ATB