Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Nina, you will see the sales when the interims are announced but commercially viable means selling at a price people will buy and at a cost you can make a profit.
Selling Nano-10.9 at £2 a litre to BIC is not worth doing on the proposed volumes and Pro Larva mask retailing at anything around £1 is clearly not attracting buyers.
I will agree to disagree with you UG , as having already applied the tech to materials and nutrients is commercially viable. Otherwise those products would not exist and be listed for sale. Please do not start on the “no sale” argument as it’s already over discussed and I will not go on explaining my stance on the matter again. :)
Nina at the moment it is just tech with no clearly identified application which would or could be commercial viable.
Until that is identified NNN RMS is for gamblers whether those who are short term or those that claim to be long term.
I second that TLWilliams. Unfortunately this share has attracted a lot of “gamblers” with unrealistic expectations and no patience, hoping for an instant return. Those that have done their research, believe in the tech and have patience will not be influenced by the drivel in this BB. GLA
There are more filtered posts than usual on my screen this morning. They are there mostly due to their preoccupation with the share price and their fallacious attempts to link it with factors which would have little influence upon it.
The company has undergone considerable re-structuring. It has a new CEO, and recent acquisitions to the board. These individuals have the right blend of experience to move the rebranded company and its USP forward. This is going to take time, and the daily nonsensical ramblings from my filtered contingent are of zero consequence as far as the company and its share price are concerned. Filter their posts, and move forward would be my best advice to any investor. Responding to their abject negativity is a total waste of time.
a very good thread indeed''
as all i can see, is shorts been taken out before the big north run
calm down and watch the ride back up'' when it's ready
already coming back 1.9% down now, nothing to worry or get nervous about..