The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from WS Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Oldblue: It would be nice if you actually reasoned, I'm happy to be proven wrong and to further my education and experiences of life. I would be happy to buy into this share if there was ANY reason to think it could work and become a world class product but all reason says no. I am not part of a deramping crew, I doubt there are any on AIM. World, national and local issues seem to throw up enough challenges or opportunities without having to artificially ramp or deramp shares. Most talk on any board seems to stem from a lack of communication from the companies themselves allowing rife speculation in both directions. The real rampers and derampers are the boards of directors and the cosy relationships with the big investment organisations, keeping truths to themselves to line their bulging pockets.
Virtually every board I've been on, the PI bemoans the lack of communication. UKOG seems to be a classic case, again I have followed that share with half an eye to buying in but the cagey and shortage of decent information stopped me; another win for me I won't be buying in now.
all i can say is the boiler/charger must be really good for a professional team to constantly talk it down
why am i wasting my time trying to reason with someone who is paid to talk down the share back into the filter box phimx
Oldblue: By my reckoning this thing is hotter than a pizza oven. I reckon the waste heat needs to keep the hot end of the Stirling engine at about 1000 C to get 71% efficiency ..... phew.
I think steel melts about 1400 C. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Oldblue: Somebody is lying and I don't think it's me. Unfortunately for us we have to rework the previous calculation because, as you can see from the RNS below, improvements to the efficiencies pushed the output up to 6.4 kW. So perhaps you could run through the figures because I get stuck at the bit where the 4.5 kW of waste heat produces 6.4 kW out. I’m sure you have a simple answer to that, most of your answers are.
RNS 26 April 2019
“The above improvements and efficiencies have provided the Charger with peak electrical output in excess of 6.4kW of electricity during a running cycle of 2,000 hours against the unit's previous output of 3.0kW, whist maintaining 15kW thermal output and a 20% reduction in the size of the appliance to below 800mm”
NOTE: The 6.4 kW out is simply a result of ‘improved efficiencies’ this is a truly remarkable feat to improve the output 100%. Tweak this tweak that, oh look I get double the output!
Also in the RNS above they seem to have forgotten that the Charger was producing 3.2 kW as per the RNS below, two years earlier !
RNS 18 July 2017
To this end, improvements to the design of the Company's Stirling engine technology, including simplification as part of the 'design for manufacture' ("DFM") process, have resulted in a peak electrical output in excess of 3.2kW of electricity against the unit's benchmark output of 3.0kW, whilst maintaining the same fuel input and heat output.
I love a Sunday
lol its like trying to teach pyshics to someone who is jotting it down in crayon keep trying
so we are agreed that it isnt a prepetual energy machine now so you where lying before?????????
Wonder what temperature is required at 71% efficiency ?
As for claiming 6.4 kW out I'll leave that for the fairies to figure out !
Oldblue: The waste heat/energy is turned into electricity, there is no doubting that, it is stated by Inspirit. That is the entire reason for building the charger - to make use of waste heat from the boiler. After you've burned 20 kW of gas and created 15 kW of hot water there is 5 kW of energy somewhere, I don't see that being in doubt. They state the boiler is 75%. Now that gets turned into 3.2 kW of electricity .... seems quite simple up to now. But it's not 5 kW is it, because I very much doubt of all of that 5 kW waste can be applied to the input of the Stirling engine. Lets just say, for the sake of a good argument/discussion, 4.5 kW actually goes into the Stirling. The calculation is then 3.2 kW (Inspirit figure) out for 4.5 kW in = 71% Far too high to believe. Total loss in the system 0.5 kW + (4.5 - 3.2) = 1.8 kW. Now that's interesting because at one time they claimed total boiler efficiency of 92%.
So they must be claiming a Stirling engine efficiency of approximately 71% ............................... better go buy me some shares, that is fantastic! But hang on my mate Oldblue says
"your wrong again let me give you a hint typical efficency off a stirling engine 15-30% but then you just deliver pizzas"
Damnation who do I believe, Inspirit or Oldblue ?
PS: The actual Stirling engine efficiency would be slightly higher than 71% because the mechanical work of the engine is then turned into electricity via the alternator this has some losses also.
Oldblue: you write "your wrong again let me give you a hint typical efficency off a stirling engine 15-30%
but then you just deliver pizzas"
So you agree with me the Charger cannot be giving 3 kW from 5 kW waste heat as stated in their RNS 15 June 2015. Otherwise it means their Stirling engine is 60% efficient and that is too good to believe.
my reply to this is you obviosly have no technical knowledge at all stop thinking 5kw waste heat and if your going to bash it at least read up to see how it works
lol so ive proved that your prepetual engine garbage was garbage and now your dragging up old rns
so you 2 still didnt answer my question what do you do for a living? you say you dont own stock yet constantly bash the company so if your not trading how do you make your money?
Show us the goods John Gunn. Show something, anything to show these people have had their money well spent.
Show us the team, hard at work !
Show us the Polish facility you've set up
Show us the Charger
There must be something for 10 years supposed hard work ?
23 December 2019:
With the continued growth demand for electric cars, the board are currently setting up an automotive division to utilise the sterling engine to provide a source of power to charge electric motor cars.
They have produced nothing to show in 10 years. Somehow I don't think this is going to happen soon.
15 June 2015:
The verification unit is currently being assembled at the Company's Sheffield development facility and, following final in-house testing, will be shipped to the independent international consultants, Enertek International Ltd ("Enertek") (www.enertekinternational.com) for testing conformance with the European Gas Appliance Directive. Enertek specialise in product research, design, development and certification. The purpose of this testing is to accredit the unit for field trial deployment in a commercial, potential customer setting, outside of a laboratory environment.
And the outcome was ?????????
15 March 2016:
John Gunn, Chairman and CEO of Inspirit, commented, "The challenge for the Company in 2016 is to complete the testing and field trial phases and move towards commercial production of the Inspirit Charger by the end of the year. The results of our in-house trials over the past 12 months have given us a great deal of confidence that this schedule will be adhered to .....
Over 4 years ago now, says it all !!!!!!
Oldblue: As you state " but again we have no proper stuff from inspirit but this would be my bestie"
Why is there no decent information from Inspirit? Why is there no information whatsoever from them?
Oldblue: you write "your wrong again let me give you a hint typical efficency off a stirling engine 15-30%
but then you just deliver pizzas"
So you agree with me the Charger cannot be giving 3 kW from 5 kW waste heat as stated in their RNS 15 June 2015. Otherwise it means their Stirling engine is 60% efficient and that is too good to believe.
but again we have no proper stuff from inspirit but this would be my bestie
again an answer tou your theory on it being a perpertual engine or some rubbish like that
23rd dec rns part off below
Inspirit intends to explore opportunities to license out the underlying technology
and the Directors believe that, in some instances, the patents owned by Inspirit may
be also used in the development of products other than a mCHP appliance. A prototype
of the appliance has been independently tested and shown to be capable of simultaneous
generation of up to 15kW thermal and up to 3kW electrical output. Once development of the
appliance has been completed and commercialised, the Directors expect that the appliance will
initially be marketed in the UK and Europe and eventually worldwide. Additional revenue streams
may be possible through product licensing, sales of warranties and further development of the product.
again this states assuming max gas flow off 20kw that 15kw heat 3 kw power 2 kw losses (assumed) for an efficency off
wait for it 90% ......not perpetual afetr all but not bad
whisper........'you looking at the wrong bit off the numbers' hint hint
your wrong again let me give you a hint typical efficency off a stirling engine 15-30%
but then you just deliver pizzas
Old blue: Could you read your posts and correct them before posting please. We all make mistakes but I find it hard work reading yours.
Oldblue: Hahahahahahaha.... What do you laugh at? The 60% efficiency? The 3 kW from 5 kW of waste heat? Tell us all which bit is wrong then everyone can have a good laugh.
RNS 15 June 2015:
... A prototype of the appliance has been independently tested and shown to be capable of simultaneous generation of up to 15kW thermal and up to 3kW electrical output...
hahahahahhahahah as ive said your not techncial
go read it in a physics book im off to the pub im not here to teach pizza boys :-)
this again is all assummed we do not have an energy in and energy out at any specific time