REMINDER: Our user survey closes on Friday, please submit your responses here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I'm not the type to report people, what does it gain ... nowt.
Ask all questions you like... but, it will achieve, nada.
LSE are the arbiters in deciding what constitutes personal information. Your refusal to provide a straight yes or no answer is sufficient for me to draw a conclusion . If you believe that my question called upon you to reveal personal information which would be in breach of the posting rules then report my post.
.... and not for you to judge, what I believe to be personal and what isn't ...
I like to follow the rules, but not straight lines.
There is nothing personal in saying whether or not you are a Greenpeace supporter.
If you remember wellwell he had the honesty to admit his sympathies with the green agenda.
You have nevertheless confirmed a long held suspicion.
Keeping things in perspective .... Personal information is against LSE rules, you should know better than to ask... tut-tut
bartlebobton
Do you support Greenpeace?
...that's neither here, nor there, when you think of how much BP were fined.... Try and keep things in perspective...
They should've been fined the day rate x the amount of days they delayed the rig, shower of do good %$&*$rds.
Keep the faith and ignore the noise.
Judge fines Greenpeace £80000 over North Sea oil rig ...
The Guardian-3 hours ago
Judge fines Greenpeace £80,000 over North Sea oil rig occupation. Scottish court rules that environmental group defied court order banning ...
Greenpeace hit with £80k fine over North Sea protest action ...
Energy Voice-2 hours ago
Greenpeace fined £80000 over 12-day North Sea protest
BBC News-3 hours ago
Greenpeace fined over North Sea oil rig protest
The National-3 hours ago
Greenpeace fined £80000 for North Sea oil rig protest
STV News-3 hours ago
View all