Stephan Bernstein, CEO of GreenRoc, details the PFS results for the new graphite processing plant. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Shut up you moron
Why is it when stocks drop to yearly lows, bell ends like you turn up? Is it cos you want it lower? Tbh no one cares you waste of space go back to sol(no)gold I hear you’re well thought of there…as a complete tool ;-)
HAD133, HAD133W1 and HAD117W6 are all included in the MRE2 tonnage/resource update provided by GGP.
I will revisit this at some stage in the future and I will apologise if I’m incorrect.
For clarity, I believe there will be minimal resource growth in the levels 0-800m. Thanks for your time Bamps no hard feelings.
Chase
I’m finding your question rude and arrogant.
I will share my research and knowledge with anyone but to be honest not this time do your own research.
I know the answer to have a dozen drill numbers without having to look.
Perhaps you should start looking.
The best drill we have went through this area but you wouldn’t know that would you
My last post was for Bamps
Bamps - IMHO Chase is transparent in his actions and secretive in his plans. At best ignorant - at worst vexatious.
What are the drill hole numbers that have been punched into the 0-800m level that aren’t included in MRE2 that support your point?
Chase I explained to you twice in my posts and you have not taken any notice of them, you have completely got the wrong end of the stick.
We have 2 sections of mine within your 0-800m depth.
The 78mt is in the SE crescent and is only a small proportion of that crescent.
The 600m you keep referring to is the future bulk caving to the NW of the crescent.
The infill drilling for the SE crescent was nearly complete by the Dec21 MRE
The infill drilling for the rest including the Northern breccia and Northern pod is still happening and maybe included in the next MRE.
This is where most of your 600mt is situated.
You can’t expect a bulk cave mining plan to be issued at that depth it needs to be around the 1300 depth
@Hydro
I’m talking purely about the main pipe between the levels 0-800m, the top of the EB is 850m and is outside of the main pipe. I’m not here to disturb let’s have a serious discussion. Between 0-800 which includes EVERY drill hole in those depths we have c70mt when it should be 600mt. Are you able to explain this?
@bamps
I’m sorry I mean no malice in my posts but you did not explain at all where the missing 600mt is.. your response of ‘I know but I’m not telling anyone’ highlights infact that you have no clue just the same as me!
Paddy produced an MRE in August 2020 in which he calculated 7Moz to a depth of 600m, his tonnage was significantly out so I’m not the only one confused with the missing tonnage. (Not a jab at Paddy I enjoy his posts).
Chase
That was a very strong negative post.
That made you look like a complete novice.
I know where there is a more to come in the 0-800m but I’m certainly not going to do your work for you.
You have ignored all my explanations it looks like you are (is that ok Norf) out to deceive people.
CJ do not reply to this keep out
@Bamps21, Do you think there is significant resource growth potential in the levels 0-800m?
If the answer is YES then please show me which drill holes in these levels can add to the tonnage.
The answer I believe will be NO. GGP included every drill hole to date between the levels 0-1000m and only produced 78mt??
There is 600mt missing, and nobody has an answer?
*specific gravity of 3 was used
*deposit widens 800-1000m but not enough for 600mt
Hi Chase
I can see you are confused.
At the time of the PFS not enough of the ore body had enough information to formulate a mining plan.
Block cave mining occurs at the base of the ore, there is not enough knowledge to say what depth or size the infrastructure will be positioned.
The Eastern breccia has added even more uncertainty of the depth or size.
Forget about the bulk block caving for now, it may or may not be featured in the forthcoming FS.
In the PFS mining plan a 2m ton pa plan was formulated from information upto 6 months previous. The sulphides were the main object with some adjoining breccia that would be retrieved in the plan as well as a few tonnage from the northern breccia.
The Ggp MRE is based on the same principles as the last plan, but further information has increased the size of the sulphides.
Most of this increase has been within the size of the surrounding breccia.
There are also increases to the depth and lengths of the sulphides increasing the tonnage and formulation of a 3mt pa mining plan.
There are still a lot of the breccia surrounding the sulphides not in the plan, this I believe is because of the shape of the Dyke sloping down to the east decreasing the amount of tonnage available lower down.
When you say 680m I believe the whole ore body is approaching 1b ton and growing.
The block caving plan might take a few more years to formulate if drilling from lower down within the decline is needed
I’m sorry you think I’m incorrect, if you still can’t get what is happening please ask the company
Chase, why do you think ncm haven’t included it.
Your no chump, so I think you know the answer.
ATB
Hi bamps thank you for your reply, I know your knowledge is superior to mine but I believe you are incorrect with your statement. In the GGP RNS there is a table that shows we have 45mt in the SE crescent and 33mt in the Breccia. If the missing 600mt is going to the included in the bulk mining why wouldn’t GGP include it in their resource update as this would increase the recourse by multiples? I really feel like the missing tonnage needs to be discussed more on the board, has it been excluded due to insufficient drilling density? Below cut off grade? Non mineralised areas? Either way it’s bothering me
Hi Chase
The 78m ton is still a tiny proportion of the SE crescent mainly the sulphides there’s still a lot of breccia around the sulphides .
The rest is where the bulk mining comes in.
From GGP’s ore reserve update we can calculate the following, 78mt @ c2g/t to a depth of approximately 1000m below cover giving a gold equivalent of 5.9Moz.
To the depth of 1000m the tonnage is 680mt, where is the missing 600mt? Has it been left out because of cut off grades? Is this tonnage not mineralised? I understand a small portion of the tonnage will be put into future resource updates but if you look at the diagrams there isn’t a lot of resource growth potential between the depths 0-800m they seem to have found the boundaries. Below 800m the deposit is wide open. Can someone please help me to understand, I appreciate any response.