Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter

SXX Share Chat - RSS Feed

Sirius Minerals Share Chat (SXX)



Share Price: 9.76Bid: 9.76Ask: 9.90Change: 0.00 (0.00%)No Movement on Sirius Minerals
Spread: 0.14Spread as %: 1.43%Open: 10.50High: 10.25Low: 9.75Yesterday’s Close: 9.76


Share Discussion for Sirius Minerals (SXX)


Thread ViewThread View
Please Login or Register to post messages
Posts per page:


Tobin
Posts: 87
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:9.76
Net buys but share price down
Thu 22:38
net buys 2.4million to sales 1million but share price still eased. But the number of buys looks good.
Strange things can happen 3rd Thursday in the month though.
 
Tobin
Posts: 87
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:9.76
View Thread (6)
RE: rangersraver
Thu 22:31
Flooding of the shafts during building is a real risk.
To stop flooding freezing or grouting can be used.
The sandstone is quite "tight" with small pores, and water movement is mainly in cracks in the sandstone.
When the boulby mine was built the first shaft was frozen and the second grouted.
The frozen shaft flooded, and the grouted shaft was sunk breaking records.
But grouted shafts also flood. One did last year in Russia.
The other reason for grouting is that frozen shafts leak more when they unfreeze, even when fully lined. Sometimes the freezing is left on, but this costs.
But the aim is to have a dry mine.
GaiasKidney
Posts: 877
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:9.76
View Thread (2)
RE: Just found this ?
Thu 18:05
Hi Orrell

The YP Harbour Facilities order app should be going in imminently and indeed useful pre-app conversation has been going on.

Keep an eye on it.

http://infrastructure.planningportal.gov.uk/projects/north-east/york-potash-harbour-facilities-order/?ipcsection=docs

ATB.

GK.
sheps8
Posts: 142
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:10.00
View Thread (2)
RE: R&CBC
Thu 13:49
Alarm over they are all back up there.
sheps8
Posts: 142
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:10.00
View Thread (2)
R&CBC
Thu 13:47
Is it just me or have the N Koreans got to the R&CBC planning portal as most of the docs have disappeared?
shylock
Posts: 2,742
Observation
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:10.00
View Thread (2)
RE: ICL CEO
Thu 10:57
Good find Scotman…We knew they were telling porky pies last year but it's good to have a public confession. Someone should point this out to Mr France - noting that none of their fabricated objections about Poly being just a"niche" product have survived into their new objection to the revised application.

And if Mr France knows that ICL are proven liars then it should rightly call into question everything else they say about the application.
Scotman
Posts: 6,278
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:10.00
View Thread (6)
RE: rangersraver
Thu 10:49
I'm glad they did the pilot holes for the shafts now! And the water seems to be getting piped away via the MTS tunnel.

Those darned shaft sinking engineers will devise a way of freezing the ground next!
sheps8
Posts: 142
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:10.00
View Thread (6)
RE: rangersraver
Thu 10:36
rangersranger, or should I call you scaremonger, are you actually involved in the discussions between the company and the EA, NP, YW, well I can answer that question for people here it's a big fat NO, may I suggest that you read in detail the letter from the EA to the planners all 26 pages in detail, in amongst that there is no reference to the tailings let you tell you why, there is none it whole of the product will be sent to Wilton for processing, as for the water ingress during shaft sinking again it's very clear YOU have not read the planning documents or being in any way whatsoever involved in the meetings and discussions between the party's involved, best get back downt pub and ask yer mates for an update pal, or actually read some documentation.

Sheps8
GaiasKidney
Posts: 877
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:10.00
View Thread (6)
RE: rangersraver
Thu 10:31
Rangersraver

You obviously have not read what EA had to say, have you?

They are talking about the treatment of human waist - what we have to do from you each time you appear.

This show has a zero prospect of stopping - luckily for the locals, planning is about moderating impacts. Spend a moment comprehending this:

"116. Planning permission should be refused for major developments in these
designated areas except in exceptional circumstances and where it can be
demonstrated they are in the public interest. Consideration of such
applications should include an assessment of:
the need for the development, including in terms of any national
considerations, and the impact of permitting it, or refusing it, upon the
local economy;
the cost of, and scope for, developing elsewhere outside the designated
area, or meeting the need for it in some other way; and
any detrimental effect on the environment, the landscape and recreational
opportunities, and the extent to which that could be moderated."

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdf

Note "public interest".

GK.





Sign up for Live Prices


Home  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Careers  |  Advertise with Us  |  Sitemap  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Cookies  |  Privacy


Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.