Blencowe Resources: Aspiring to become one of the largest graphite producers in the world. Watch the video here.

Less Ads, More Data, More Tools Register for FREE

Pin to quick picksROSN.L Regulatory News (ROSN)

  • There is currently no data for ROSN

Watchlists are a member only feature

Login to your account

Alerts are a premium feature

Login to your account

Annual Financial Report (FSA Requirements)

30 Apr 2012 07:00

RNS Number : 2947C
OJSC OC Rosneft
28 April 2012
 



 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 andfor the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

With Report of Independent Auditors

 

 

Report of Independent Auditors

 

Shareholders and the Board of Directors

of Rosneft Oil Company

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Rosneft Oil Company, an open joint stock company ("the Company"), as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the supplementary information about the Company's oil and gas exploration and production operations on page 53 be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.

 

Ernst&Young LLC

February 3, 2012

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

(in millions of US dollars, except share amounts)

 

As of December 31,

Notes

2011

2010

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

3

5,172

4,154

Restricted cash

3

117

30

Short-term investments

4

4,655

6,814

Accounts receivable, net

5

9,036

7,512

Inventories

6

4,011

2,111

Deferred tax assets

18

216

174

Prepayments and other current assets

7

2,435

2,156

Assets held for sale

8

-

92

Total current assets

25,642

23,043

Non-current assets:

Long-term investments

8

5,059

2,936

Long-term bank loans granted, net of allowance of US$ 31 and

US$ 16, respectively

403

304

Property, plant and equipment, net

9

67,748

61,190

Goodwill

11

4,507

4,507

Intangible assets, net

11

702

767

Deferred tax assets

18

218

125

Other non-current assets

12

1,689

957

Total non-current assets

80,326

70,786

Total assets

105,968

93,829

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

13

5,821

3,861

Short-term loans and current portion of long-term debt

14

4,734

5,498

Income and other tax liabilities

15

2,146

1,971

Deferred tax liabilities

18

127

86

Other current liabilities

165

240

Liabilities related to assets held for sale

8

-

37

Total current liabilities

12,993

11,693

Asset retirement obligations

19

2,642

2,328

Long-term debt

14

18,557

18,057

Deferred tax liabilities

18

4,653

4,908

Other non-current liabilities

20

321

1,339

Total non-current liabilities

26,173

26,632

Equity:

Common stock, par value 0.01 RUB (shares outstanding: 9,588 million and 9,599 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)

16

20

20

Treasury shares (at acquisition cost: 1,010 million and 999 million shares as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)

(7,615)

(7,511)

Additional paid-in capital

16

12,899

13,110

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

33

(20)

Retained earnings

60,424

48,936

Total shareholders' equity

65,761

54,535

Noncontrolling interests

1,041

969

Total equity

66,802

55,504

Total liabilities and equity

105,968

93,829

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

 

(in millions of US dollars, except earnings per share data) 

 

For the years ended December 31,

Notes

2011

2010

2009

Revenues

Oil and gas sales

23

47,417

34,767

24,820

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

23

43,020

26,660

20,736

Support services and other revenues

1,538

1,620

1,270

Total

91,975

63,047

46,826

Costs and expenses

Production and operating expenses

6,540

4,792

4,024

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

10,058

2,386

1,890

General and administrative expenses

1,785

1,584

1,416

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

7,329

6,980

5,414

Exploration expense

448

439

325

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

5,996

5,597

4,350

Accretion expense

146

107

87

Taxes other than income tax

18

16,911

10,920

8,061

Export customs duty

17

26,882

16,743

12,131

Total

76,095

49,548

37,698

Operating income

15,880

13,499

9,128

Other income/(expenses)

Interest income

658

547

516

Interest expense

(320)

(580)

(605)

Loss on disposal of non-current assets

(230)

(156)

(350)

Gain on disposal of investments

39

23

5

Equity share in affiliates' profits

8

577

60

112

Dividends and income/(loss) from joint ventures

11

11

(8)

Other expenses, net

4, 8, 20, 22

(260)

(120)

(350)

Foreign exchange (loss)/gain

(649)

32

71

Total other expenses, net

(174)

(183)

(609)

Income before income tax

15,706

13,316

8,519

Income tax

18

(3,117)

(2,644)

(2,000)

Net income

12,589

10,672

6,519

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

(137)

(272)

(5)

Net income attributable to Rosneft

12,452

10,400

6,514

Other comprehensive income

53

2

18

Comprehensive income

12,505

10,402

6,532

Net income attributable to Rosneft per share

(in US$) - basic and diluted

1.30

1.08

0.68

Weighted average number of shares

outstanding (millions)

9,591

9,598

9,598

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

 

for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

(in millions of US dollars, except share amounts)

 

Number

of shares

(millions)

Common

stock

Additional

paid-in

capital

Treasury

shares

Accumulated other comprehen-

sive

income/(loss)

Retained earnings

Total shareholders' equity

Noncon-

trolling

interests

Total equity

Balance at December 31, 2008

9,598

20

13,108

(7,521)

(40)

33,336

38,903

695

39,598

Net income for the year

-

-

-

-

-

6,514

6,514

5

6,519

Purchase of shares

(1)

-

-

(4)

-

-

(4)

-

(4)

Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities

-

-

-

-

18

-

18

-

18

Dividends declared on common stock

-

-

-

-

-

(600)

(600)

-

(600)

Dividends declared to minority shareholders in subsidiaries

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(7)

(7)

Change in ownership interests in subsidiaries

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

13

13

Balance at December 31, 2009

9,597

20

13,108

(7,525)

(22)

39,250

44,831

706

45,537

Net income for the year

-

-

-

-

-

10,400

10,400

272

10,672

Sale of shares

2

-

(1)

14

-

-

13

-

13

Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities

-

-

-

-

2

-

2

-

2

Dividends declared on common stock

-

-

-

-

-

(714)

(714)

-

(714)

Dividends declared to minority shareholders in subsidiaries

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(6)

(6)

Change in ownership interests in subsidiaries

-

-

3

-

-

-

3

(3)

-

Balance at December 31, 2010

9,599

20

13,110

(7,511)

(20)

48,936

54,535

969

55,504

Net income for the year

-

-

-

-

-

12,452

12,452

137

12,589

Purchase of shares (Note 16)

(11)

-

-

(104)

-

-

(104)

-

(104)

Effect of a transaction with a related party under common control

(Note 16)

-

-

89

-

-

-

89

-

89

Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities

-

-

-

-

(24)

-

(24)

-

(24)

Foreign currency translation reserve

-

-

-

-

77

-

77

-

77

Dividends declared on common stock(Note 16)

-

-

-

-

-

(964)

(964)

-

(964)

Dividends declared to minority shareholders in subsidiaries

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(4)

(4)

Change in ownership interests in subsidiaries (Note 16)

-

-

(300)

-

-

-

(300)

(61)

(361)

Balance at December 31, 2011

9,588

20

12,899

(7,615)

33

60,424

65,761

1,041

66,802

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

(in millions of US dollars)

 

For the years ended December 31,

 

Notes

2011

2010

2009

 

 

Operating activities

 

 

Net income

12,589

10,672

6,519

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

Effect of foreign exchange

(142)

(21)

(454)

 

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

5,996

5,597

4,350

 

 

Dry hole costs

154

114

170

 

 

Loss on disposal of non-current assets

230

156

350

 

 

(Gain)/loss from assets and liabilities written off

4, 8, 20

(321)

31

-

 

 

Deferred income tax benefit

18

(189)

(253)

(106)

 

 

Accretion expense

146

107

87

 

 

Equity share in affiliates' profits

8

(577)

(60)

(112)

 

 

Gain on disposal of investments

(39)

(23)

(5)

 

 

Increase/(decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts and bank loans granted

22

47

(41)

 

 

Gain on extinguishment of promissory notes

14

(4)

(178)

(207)

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities net of acquisitions:

 

 

Increase in accounts receivable

(1,446)

(964)

(287)

 

 

Increase in inventories

(1,900)

(232)

(459)

 

 

Increase in restricted cash

(87)

(10)

(16)

 

 

Increase in prepayments and other current assets

(289)

(97)

(280)

 

 

(Increase)/decrease in other non-current assets

(4)

14

117

 

 

(Increase)/decrease in long-term bank loans granted

(114)

23

(2)

 

 

(Decrease)/increase in interest payable

(108)

63

128

 

 

Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

1,915

307

555

 

 

Increase in income and other tax liabilities

213

351

820

 

 

Decrease in other current and non-current liabilities

(422)

(239)

(365)

 

 

Acquisition of trading securities

(2,183)

(1,134)

(997)

 

 

Proceeds from sale of trading securities

2,309

901

554

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

15,749

15,172

10,319

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)

 

(in millions of US dollars)

 

For the years ended December 31,

Notes

2011

2010

2009

Investment activities

Capital expenditures

(13,246)

(8,931)

(7,252)

Acquisition of licences

(254)

(140)

(96)

Acquisition of rights to use trademarks "Sochi 2014"

11

(18)

(18)

(104)

Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment

58

55

33

Acquisition of short-term investments, including

Held-to-maturity securities, deposits and loans given

(2,114)

(4,190)

(2,911)

Available-for-sale securities

(1,185)

(692)

(225)

Proceeds from redemption/sale of short-term investments, including

Held-to-maturity securities, deposits and loans given

5,730

1,636

2,534

Available-for-sale securities

638

665

66

Acquisition of short-term notes receivable

(1,177)

(251)

-

Proceeds from sale of short-term notes receivable

354

-

-

Acquisition of long-term investments, including

Held-to-maturity securities and loans given

(21)

(193)

(628)

Available-for-sale securities

(66)

(10)

(1,035)

Proceeds from redemption/sale of long-term investments, including

Held-to-maturity securities and loans given

16

15

1

Available-for-sale securities

2

1

3

Acquisition of entities, additional shares in subsidiaries and equity investees, net of cash acquired

8, 16

(2,038)

(5)

(67)

Margin call deposit placed

-

-

(293)

Margin call deposit returned

-

-

1,208

Placements under reverse REPO agreements

(1,053)

(403)

(22)

Receipts under reverse REPO agreements

768

22

-

Net cash used in investing activities

(13,606)

(12,439)

(8,788)

Financing activities

Proceeds from short-term debt

897

274

1,029

Repayment of short-term debt

(626)

(779)

(7,180)

Proceeds from long-term debt

3,842

5,910

11,844

Repayment of long-term debt

(4,044)

(5,235)

(5,939)

Cash paid for acquisition of treasury shares

(104)

-

(5)

Proceeds from sale of treasury shares

-

13

-

Dividends paid to shareholders

(949)

(730)

(622)

Dividends paid to minority shareholders in subsidiaries

(4)

(11)

(4)

Net cash used in financing activities

(988)

(558)

(877)

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

1,155

2,175

654

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

4,154

1,997

1,369

Effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents

(137)

(18)

(26)

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

5,172

4,154

1,997

Supplementary disclosures of cash flow information

Cash paid for interest

805

618

690

Cash paid for interest (net of amount capitalized)

333

271

336

Cash paid for income tax

3,123

2,891

1,561

Supplementary disclosure of non-cash activities

Income tax offsets

-

-

289

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

as of December 31, 2011 and 2010

 

and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

 

1. General

 

Nature of Operations

 

Open Joint Stock Company ("OJSC") Rosneft Oil Company ("Rosneft") and its subsidiaries (collectively the "Company") are principally engaged in exploration, development, production and sale of crude oil and gas and refining, transportation and sale of petroleum products in the Russian Federation and in certain international markets.

 

Rosneft State Enterprise was incorporated as an open joint stock company on December 7, 1995. All assets and liabilities previously managed by Rosneft State Enterprise were transferred to the Company at their book value effective on that date together with the Government of the Russian Federation ("State") ownership in other privatized oil and gas companies. The transfer of assets and liabilities was made in accordance with Russian Government Resolution No. 971 dated September 29, 1995, On the Transformation of Rosneft State Enterprise into an Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Rosneft". Such transfers represented a reorganization of assets under the common control of the State and, accordingly, were accounted for at their book value. In 2005, the State contributed the shares of Rosneft to the share capital of OJSC Rosneftegaz. As of December 31, 2005, 100% of the shares of Rosneft less one share were owned by OJSC Rosneftegaz and one share was owned by the Russian Federation Federal Agency for the Management of Federal Property. Subsequently, OJSC Rosneftegaz's ownership interest decreased through additional issuance of shares during Rosneft's Initial Public Offering ("IPO") in Russia, issuance of Global Depository Receipts ("GDR") for the shares on London Stock Exchange and the share swap realized during the merger of Rosneft and certain subsidiaries in 2006. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, OJSC Rosneftegaz maintains a 75.16% ownership interest in Rosneft.

 

Under Russian legislation, natural resources, including oil, gas, precious metals and minerals and other commercial minerals situated within the territory of the Russian Federation are the property of the State until they are extracted. Law of the Russian Federation No. 2395-1, On Subsurface Resources, regulates relations arising in connection with the geological study, and the use and protection of subsurface resources within the territory of the Russian Federation. Pursuant to the Law, subsurface resources may be developed only on the basis of a licence. A licenсe is issued by the regional governmental body and contains information on the site to be developed, the period of activity, as well as financial and other conditions. The Company holds licences issued by regional authorities for geological studies, exploration and development of oil and gas blocks and fields in areas where its subsidiaries are located.

 

The Company is subject to export quotas set by the State Pipeline Commission to allow equal access to the limited capacity of oil pipeline system owned and operated by OJSC Transneft. The Company exports certain quantities of crude oil bypassing Transneft system thus achieving higher export capacity. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company's export sales were approximately 58%, 57% and 57% of produced crude oil, respectively. The remaining production was processed at the Company's refineries for further sale on domestic and international markets.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

1. General (continued)

 

Nature of Operations (continued)

Principal Rosneft's subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements and respective ownership interests as of December 31, 2011 are as follows:

Name

Nature of Business

Preferred and

Common Shares

Voting

Shares

Exploration and production

%

%

LLC RN-Yuganskneftegaz

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

LLC RN-Purneftegaz

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

LLC RN-Sakhalinmorneftegaz

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

LLC RN-Krasnodarneftegaz

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

LLC RN-Stavropolneftegaz

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

LLC RN-Severnaya Neft (Northern Oil)

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

CJSC RN-Astra

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

CJSC Sakhalinmorneftegaz Shelf

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

OJSC Dagneftegaz

Oil and gas development and production

81.22

81.22

OJSC Rosneft-Dagneft

Oil and gas development and production

68.70

68.70

CJSC Vankorneft

Oil and gas development and production

93.96

93.96

OJSC Grozneftegaz

Oil and gas production operator services

51.00

51.00

LLC RN-Exploration

Field survey and exploration

100.00

100.00

LLC RN-Kaiganneftegaz

Field survey and exploration

100.00

100.00

LLC Vostok-Smidt Invest

Investment activities

100.00

100.00

LLC Zapad-Smidt Invest

Investment activities

100.00

100.00

OJSC East-Siberian Oil and Gas Company

Oil and gas development and production

99.52

99.52

LLC Val Shatskogo

Oil and gas development

100.00

100.00

OJSC Samaraneftegaz

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

Refining, marketing and distribution

LLC RN-Tuapse Refinery

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

LLC RN-Komsomolsky Refinery

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft-MZ Nefteproduct

Petroleum refining

65.42

65.42

OJSC Angarsk Petrochemical Company

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

OJSC Achinsk Refinery

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

OJSC Angarsk Polymer Plant

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

OJSC Kuybyshev Refinery

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

OJSC Novokuybyshev Refinery

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

OJSC Syzran Refinery

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

CJSC Neftegorsk Gas-Processing Plant

Gas processing

100.00

100.00

CJSC Otradny Gas-Processing Plant

Gas processing

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft-ARTAG

Marketing and distribution

38.00

50.67

OJSC Rosneft-Altainefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

64.18

78.59

LLC RN-Arkhangelsknefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft-Kabardino-Balkarskaya Toplivnaya Company

Marketing and distribution

99.81

99.89

OJSC Rosneft-Kubannefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

89.50

96.61

OJSC Rosneft-Karachaevo-Cherkessknefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

85.99

85.99

OJSC Rosneft-Kurgannefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

83.32

90.33

OJSC Rosneft-Murmansknefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

45.38

45.38

LLC RN-Nakhodkanefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft-Smolensknefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

66.67

86.97

LLC RN-Tuapsenefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft-Yamalnefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

49.52

49.52

LLC RN-Vostoknefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft-Stavropolye

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

1. General (continued)

 

Nature of Operations (continued)

 

Name

Nature of Business

Preferred and Common Shares

Voting

Shares

%

%

LLC RN-Trade

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

CJSC Exponeft

Marketing and distribution

45.38

45.38

CJSC Irkutsknefteprodukt

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC Samaranefteprodukt

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

LLC Samara Terminal

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC Buryatnefteprodukt

Marketing and distribution

97.48

98.88

CJSC Khakasnefteprodukt VNK

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC Tomsknefteprodukt VNK

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC Belgorodnefteprodukt

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

CJSC Bryansknefteprodukt

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC Voronezhnefteprodukt

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

CJSC Lipetsknefteprodukt

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

CJSC Orelnefteprodukt

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

CJSC Penzanefteprodukt

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

CJSC Tambovnefteprodukt

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

CJSC Ulyanovsknefteprodukt

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

LLC Ulyanovsk Terminal

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC RN-Moskva

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

CJSC NBA Service

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC Germes Moskva

Marketing and distribution

85.61

85.61

CJSC Contract Oil

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

CJSC Mytischi Fuel Company

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

OJSC Stavropolnefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

LLC U-Kuban

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

LLC RN-Ingushnefteproduct

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

Rosneft Trading S.A.

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

Trumpet Limited

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

Other

Rosneft International Ltd.

Holding company

100.00

100.00

CJSC Rosnefteflot

Transportation services

51.00

51.00

OJSC All-Russian Bank for Reconstruction and Development of Russian Regions (VBRR)

Banking

84.67

84.67

OJSC Dalnevostochniy Bank

Banking

82.06

82.62

CJSC RN-Shelf-Dalniy Vostok

Management company

100.00

100.00

CJSC RN-Sety

Electric-power transmission services

100.00

100.00

LLC RN-Burenie

Drilling services

100.00

100.00

LLC NK Rosneft NTC

Research and development activities

100.00

100.00

CJSC Yukostransservice

Transportation services

100.00

100.00

 

All of the above subsidiaries, except for Rosneft International Ltd., Rosneft Trading S.A. and Trumpet Limited are incorporated in the Russian Federation. Rosneft International Ltd. and Trumpet Limited are registered in Ireland, Rosneft Trading S.A. is registered in Switzerland.

 

 

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies

 

Form and Content of the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

The Company maintains its books and records in accordance with accounting and taxation principles and practices mandated by Russian legislation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements were derived from the Company's Russian statutory books and records with adjustments made to present them in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP").

 

Subsequent events have been evaluated through February 1, 2012, the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements differ from the financial statements issued for statutory purposes in Russia in that they reflect certain adjustments, not recorded in the Company's statutory books, which are appropriate to present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with US GAAP. The principal adjustments relate to: (1) recognition of certain expenses; (2) valuation and depreciation of property, plant and equipment; (3) foreign currency translation; (4) deferred income taxes; (5) valuation allowances for unrecoverable assets; (6) accounting for the time value of money; (7) accounting for investments in oil and gas property and conveyances; (8) consolidation principles; (9) recognition and disclosure of guarantees, contingencies, commitments and certain assets and liabilities; (10) accounting for asset retirement obligations; (11) business combinations and goodwill; (12) accounting for derivative instruments.

 

Certain items in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and the consolidated statements of cash flows and notes for the years 2010 and 2009 were reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

 

Management Estimates

 

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as well as the amounts of revenues and expenses recognized during the period. Certain significant estimates and assumptions for the Company include: estimation of economically recoverable oil and gas reserves; rights to, recoverability and useful lives of long-term assets and investments; impairment of goodwill; allowances for doubtful accounts receivable; asset retirement obligations; legal and tax contingencies; environmental remediation obligations; recognition and disclosure of guarantees and other commitments; fair value measurements; ability to renew operating leases and to enter into new lease agreements, and classification of certain debt amounts. Management believes it has a reasonable and appropriate basis for its judgment pertaining to its estimates and assumptions. However, actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

US dollar ("US$") is the functional currency of Rosneft and its Russian subsidiaries and the reporting currency of the Company for the purpose of financial reporting under US GAAP. Functional currency of certain foreign subsidiaries may differ from US$. Monetary assets and liabilities of such subsidiaries have been translated into US$ using the official exchange rate of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation ("CBR") as of the balance sheet date. Non monetary assets and liabilities have been translated at historical rates. Revenues, expenses and cash flows have, where practicable, been translated into US$ at exchange rates that are close to the actual rate of exchange prevailing on transaction dates.

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Foreign Currency Translation (continued)

 

Gains and losses resulting from the re-measurement into US$ are included in "Foreign exchange (loss)/gain" in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. For the foreign subsidiaries with the functional currency other than US$ gains and losses resulting from the re-measurement into US$ are included in "Other comprehensive (loss)/income" in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

 

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the CBR official rates of exchange were 32.20 rubles ("RUB") and 30.48 RUB per US$, respectively. Average rates of exchange for 12 months of 2011 and 2010 were 29.39 RUB and 30.37 RUB per US$, respectively. As of February 13, 2012, the official rate of exchange was 30.19 RUB per US$.

 

The translation of local currency denominated assets and liabilities into US$ for the purposes of these financial statements does not indicate that the Company could realize or settle, in US$, the reported values of these assets and liabilities. Likewise, it does not indicate that the Company could return or distribute the reported US$ value of equity to its shareholders.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of majority-owned, controlled subsidiaries and variable interest entities where the Company is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The equity method is used to account for investments in affiliates in which the Company has the ability to exert significant influence over the affiliates' operating and financial policies. The investments in entities where the Company holds the majority of shares, but the minority shareholders have significant participating rights, are also accounted for using the equity method. The Company's share in net profit or loss of equity investees also includes any other-than-temporary declines in fair value recognized during the period. Investments in other companies are accounted for at cost and adjusted for impairment, if any.

 

Business Combinations

 

The Company accounts for its business combinations according to FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations, and FASB ASC 810, Consolidation. The Company applies the acquisition method of accounting and recognizes the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management's judgment and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including assumptions with respect to future cash inflows and outflows, discount rates, licenсe and other asset lives and market multiples, among other items.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date over the fair values of the identifiable net asset acquired. The excess of the fair values of the identifiable net asset acquired over the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree should be recognized as a gain in consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income on the acquisition date.

 

For investees accounted for under the equity method, the excess of the cost to acquire a share in those entities over the fair value of the acquired share of net assets as of the acquisition date is treated as embedded goodwill.

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)

In accordance with requirements of FASB ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized. Instead, they are tested at least annually for impairment. The impairment loss is recognized when the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value. The impairment test is comprised of two stages. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, the goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. Otherwise, the second step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss resulting from the excess of the reporting unit's carrying value over its fair value. The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. Subsequent reversal of a previously recognized goodwill impairment loss is prohibited.

 

Intangible assets that have a finite useful life are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of their useful life or the term established by legislation.

 

Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests in the net assets and net results of consolidated subsidiaries are shown under "Noncontrolling interests" and "Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and statements of income and comprehensive income, respectively. Losses attributable to the Company and the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary may exceed their interests in the subsidiary's equity. The excess, and any further losses attributable to the Company and the noncontrolling interest, are to be attributed to those interests. That is, the noncontrolling interest continues to be attributed its share of losses even if that attribution results in a deficit noncontrolling interest balance. The actual ruble-denominated balances attributable to noncontrolling interests may differ from these amounts presented in these consolidated financial statements.

 

Assets Held For Sale

 

The Company accounts for its assets as held for sale in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 205-20, Discontinued operations. A long-lived asset (disposal group) to be sold is classified as held for sale in the period in which all of the held-for-sale criteria are met, and measured at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. A long-lived asset is not depreciated (amortized) while it is classified as held for sale.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash represents cash on hand and in the Company's bank accounts and interest bearing deposits which can be effectively withdrawn at any time without prior notice or penalties reducing the principal amount of the deposit. Cash equivalents are highly liquid, short-term investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have original maturities of three months or less from their date of purchase. Cash equivalents are carried at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.

 

Loans, Notes and Accounts Receivable

 

Loans, notes and accounts receivable are stated at their principal amounts outstanding net of loan losses and allowances for doubtful debts. Specific allowances are recorded against notes receivable and trade receivables whose recovery has been identified as doubtful. Estimates of allowances require the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions.

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Earnings per Share

 

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the corresponding period. In the absence of any securities-to-shares conversion transactions, the amount of basic earnings per share stated in these financial statements is equal to the amount of diluted earnings per share.

 

Inventories

 

Inventories consisting primarily of crude oil, petroleum products and materials and supplies are expensed at the average cost or the cost of each unit and are stated at the lower of weighted average cost of acquisition (production) or market value. Market value shall not exceed net realizable value (i.e. the price at which inventories can be sold after allowing for the cost of completion and sale), and shall not be lower than net realizable values less the amount of margin.

 

Financial Investments

 

All debt and equity securities held by the Company are classified into one of the following three categories: trading securities, available-for-sale securities, held-to-maturity securities.

 

Trading securities are purchased and held principally for the purpose of sale in the nearest future. Held-to-maturity securities represent financial instruments that the Company has both the intent and the ability to hold to maturity. All other securities, which do not fall into these two categories, are classified as available-for-sale securities.

 

Trading securities and available-for-sale securities are carried at fair (market) value. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized cost. Unrealized gains or losses on trading securities are recognized in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities less related tax effects are recognized as a separate component of comprehensive income through the date of disposal.

 

Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities are reported separately for each type of security. Dividends and interest income are recognized in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

 

Investments in shares or interests of companies where the Company has less than 20% equity interest and no significant influence, which are not publicly traded, and whose market value is not readily available, are carried at cost.

 

Repurchase and Resale Agreements

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase ("REPO") and securities purchased under agreements to resell ("reverse REPO") generally do not constitute a sale for accounting purposes of the underlying securities, and are treated as collateralized financing transactions. Interest paid or received on all REPO and reverse REPO transactions is recorded in "Interest expense" or "Interest income" at the contractually specified rate using the effective interest method.

 

Oil and Gas Exploration and Development

 

In accordance with FASB ASC 932, Extractive Activities-Oil and Gas, oil and gas exploration and development costs are recognized under the successful efforts method. This method prescribes that

exploration costs, including geological and geophysical costs and the costs of dry holes, are charged to expense when incurred.

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Oil and Gas Exploration and Development (continued)

 

Exploratory well costs (including costs associated with stratigraphic test wells) are temporarily capitalized pending determination of whether commercial oil and gas reserves have been discovered by the drilling effort. The length of time necessary for this determination depends on the specific technical or economic difficulties in assessing the recoverability of the reserves. If a determination is made that the well did not encounter oil and gas in economically viable quantities, the well costs are expensed and are reported in "Exploration expense".

 

Exploratory drilling costs are temporarily capitalized pending determination of whether the well has found proved reserves if both of the following conditions are met:

• the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify, if appropriate, its completion as a producing well, assuming that the required capital expenditure is made; and

• satisfactory progress toward ultimate development of the reserves is being achieved, with the Company making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project.

 

The Company evaluates the progress made on the basis of regular project reviews which take into account the following factors:

• If additional exploratory drilling or other exploratory activities (such as seismic work or other significant studies) are either underway or firmly planned, the Company deems there to be satisfactory progress. For these purposes, exploratory activities are considered firmly planned only if they are included in the Company's three-year exploration plan/budget. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, exploratory drilling costs capitalized on this basis were not material.

• In cases where exploratory activity has been completed, the evaluation of satisfactory progress takes into account indicators such as the fact that costs for development studies are incurred in the current period, or that governmental or other third-party authorizations are pending or that the availability of capacity on an existing transport or processing facility awaits confirmation. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, exploratory drilling costs capitalized on this basis were not material.

 

Should the project be deemed commercially viable, it is then transferred to the development stage, otherwise the costs are expensed.

 

Costs, including "internal" costs relating to drilling and equipping of development wells, including development dry holes, as well as costs required for drilling and equipping of injection wells in the process of oil and gas reserves development, are capitalized. These costs are included in exploration and production assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation and depletion. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of property is charged to operating expenses. Renewals and betterments of assets are capitalized.

 

Upon sale or retirement of property, plant and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and depletion are eliminated from the accounts. Any resulting gains or losses are included in the income statement.

 

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization

 

Depletion expense of acquisition costs of proved oil and gas properties is calculated using the unit-of-production method based on total proved reserves. Depletion expense of other capitalized costs related to oil and gas production is calculated using the unit-of production method based on proved developed reserves. Management of the Company considers each field as the appropriate level for these calculations.

 

Acquisition costs of unproved properties are not amortized. These costs are reclassified as proved properties when the relevant reserve reclassification is made. Acquisition costs of unproved properties are reviewed for impairment, and where impairment arises, these costs are expensed.

 

Depreciation charges with respect to property, plant and equipment other than oil and gas properties is computed using the straight-line method and based on their useful lives.

 

Depreciation rates are applied to groups of assets with similar economic characteristics, as shown below:

 

Asset Group

Average Useful Life

Buildings and constructions

30 - 45 years

Plant and machinery

5 - 25 years

Vehicles and other equipment

6 -10 years

Service vessels

20 years

Offshore drilling assets

20 years

 

Interests in Joint Operations

 

A joint operation is a contractual arrangement whereby two or more parties (participants) undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint control. Joint control is only exercised when strategic, financial and operating decisions relating to the joint activity are made unanimously by all the parties. A joint venture is a registered company, partnership or any other legal form for the purposes of handling joint operations.

 

Financial results, assets and liabilities arising from interests in incorporated joint ventures are recognized in these consolidated financial statements using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, investments in joint ventures are recognized at the cost of financial investments increased by any change to the share of net assets from the date of inception of a joint venture, less distributed earnings and impairment of financial investments. The consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income include the Company's share in gains and losses arising from joint ventures.

 

The Company discontinues the use of the equity method of accounting from the date on which it ceases to have joint control over, or have significant influence in, a jointly-controlled entity.

 

Undivided interests in unincorporated oil and gas joint ventures are consolidated on a proportionate basis.

 

A part of an interest in a jointly-controlled oil and gas exploration and production entity may be assigned to other participants or third parties. In which case, in accordance with FASB ASC 932, such assignment is performed and accounted for under an arrangement called a "carried interest" whereby the assignee agrees to carry all costs of drilling, developing, and operating the property. The assignee is also entitled to all of the revenue from hydrocarbon production from the property, excluding any third party interest, until all of the assignee's costs, including the contractual rate of return, have been recovered, at such time the assignor will resume its participation in operating expenses and income.

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

Long-lived assets, including blocks with proved oil and gas reserves, are assessed for potential impairment in accordance with paragraphs 360-10-35-17 through 360-10-35-36 of FASB ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment.

 

Oil and gas properties are assessed whenever events or circumstances indicate potential impairment. If the carrying value of oil and gas properties is not recoverable through undiscounted cash flows, an impairment is recognized. The impairment is determined on the basis of the estimated fair value of oil and gas properties which, in turn, is measured by discounting future net cash flows or with reference to current market prices of oil and gas properties, if available. Discounted future cash flows from oil and gas fields are based on the most reliable management estimates of future prices that rely on recent actual prices and published prices for forward transactions; such prices are applied to forecast production volumes at particular fields with further discounting for the expected risk level.

 

Forecast production volumes shall be understood as reserves, including probable reserves that are proposed to be extracted using a known amount of capital expenditures. Production volumes and prices correspond to the internal plans and forecasts, as well as other data in the published financial statements. Assumptions regarding future prices and costs used to assess oil and gas properties for impairment differ from those used in the standard procedure for discounting net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves.

 

Individual assets are grouped for impairment purposes at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows from other groups of assets - generally on a field-by-field basis for exploration and production assets, for refining assets - at the entire refining unit, for service stations - at the site level. Long-lived assets intended by management for use during a period not exceeding one year are recorded at the lower of depreciated value or fair value, less selling expenses.

 

Acquisition costs of unproved oil and gas properties are assessed for impairment on a regular basis and any estimated impairment is charged to expenses.

 

Impairment of Investments

 

If the decline in fair value of an investment below its carrying value is other than temporary, the carrying value of the investment is reduced and a loss in the amount of any such decline is recorded. Cost method investments are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances occur which may have a significant effect on the fair value of these investments. Fair value determination is based on quoted market prices, if available, or on the present value of expected cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks of the investment.

 

Capitalized Interest

 

Interest expense related to the use of borrowed funds used for capital construction projects and acquisition of properties, plant and equipment is capitalized provided that such interest expense could have been avoided if the Company had not made capital investments. Interest is capitalized only during the period when construction activities are actually in progress and until the resulting properties are put into operation. The Company capitalized US$ 472 million, US$ 347 million and US$ 354 million of interest costs in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Leasing Agreements

 

Capital leases, which transfer to the Company substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item, are capitalized at the inception of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are apportioned between the interest charges and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liabilities. Interest charges are charged directly to the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

 

Capitalized leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term unless leased assets are capitalized because the terms of the lease agreement grant the Company ownership rights over the leased assets by the end of the lease term or contain a bargain purchase option. In the latter cases capitalized assets are depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset regardless of the lease term.

 

Leases where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the assets are classified as operating leases. Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

 

Asset Retirement Obligations

 

The Company has asset retirement obligations associated with its core business activities. The nature of the assets and potential obligations are as follows:

 

Exploration and Production - the Company's exploration, development and production activities involve the use of the following assets: wells, related equipment and operating sites, oil gathering and treatment facilities, tank farms and in-field pipelines. Generally, licences and other regulatory acts require that such assets be decommissioned upon the completion of production. According to these requirements, the Company is obliged to decommission wells, dismantle equipment, restore the sites and perform other related activities. The Company's estimates of these obligations are based on

current regulatory or licence requirements, as well as actual dismantling and other related costs. Asset retirement obligations are calculated in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 410-20, Asset Retirement Obligations.

 

Refining, Marketing and Distribution - this business segment covers refining operations, marine and other distribution terminals, and retail sales. The Company's refining operations consist of major petrochemical operations and industrial complexes. A number of industrial complexes have been in operation for several decades. Management of the Company believes that given the nature of the operations, the useful lives of these industrial complexes are indeterminable, while certain of their operating components and equipment have definite useful lives. Legal or contractual asset retirement obligations related to petrochemical, oil refining, marketing and distribution activities are not recognized due to the limited history of such activities in these segments, the lack of clear legal requirements as to the recognition of obligations, as well as the fact that useful lives of such assets are not determinable.

 

FASB ASC 410-20 calls for measurements of asset retirement obligations to include, as a component of expected costs, an estimate of the price that a third party would demand, and could expect to receive, for bearing the uncertainties and unforeseeable circumstances inherent in the obligations, sometimes referred to as a market-risk premium. To date, the oil and gas industry has few examples of credit-worthy third parties which are willing to assume this type of risk, for a determinable price, on major oil and gas production facilities and pipelines. Therefore, because determining such a market-risk premium would be an arbitrary process, it has been excluded from the FASB ASC 410-20.

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Asset Retirement Obligations (continued)

 

Because of the reasons described above the fair value of an asset retirement obligation cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to continuous changes in the Russian regulatory and legal environment, there could be future changes to the requirements and contingencies associated with the retirement of long-lived assets.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments, defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

 

Financial assets and financial liabilities recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets include cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments, accounts receivable and payable, short-term and long-term debt and other current and non-current assets and liabilities.

 

The Company, using available market information, management's estimates and appropriate valuation methodologies, has determined the approximate fair values of financial instruments.

 

The Company applies FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which establishes a fair value hierarchy and requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value. FASB ASC 820 defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to assess at the measurement date. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or model-derived valuations or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect the Company's own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

 

Income Taxes

 

Through 2012 Russian legislation did not contain the concept of a "consolidated tax payer" and, accordingly, the Company was not subject to Russian taxation on a consolidated basis but rather on an individual subsidiary basis. Income taxes are provided on taxable profit as determined under the Russian Federation Tax Code. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in the amount determined by the Company using the liability method in accordance with FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes. This method takes into account future tax consequences, based on the effective tax rate, associated with differences between the carrying values of assets and liabilities and their taxable base, which gives immediate income statement effect to changes in income tax laws, including changes in the tax rates. A valuation allowance for a deferred tax asset is recorded when management believes that it is more likely than not that this tax asset will not be realized.

 

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions and reflects liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits together with corresponding interest and penalties in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income as Income tax expense.

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Derivative Instruments

 

All derivative instruments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value in either Other current assets, Other non-current assets, Other current liabilities or Other non-current liabilities. Recognition and classification of a gain or loss that results from recognition of a derivative instrument at fair value depends on the purpose for issuing or holding the derivative instrument. Gains and losses from derivatives that are not accounted for as hedges under FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, are recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

 

Recognition of Revenues

 

Revenues are recognized when title passes from the seller to the customer, the contract price is fixed or determinable and collectability of the receivable is reasonably assured. Specifically, domestic sales of crude oil and gas, as well as petroleum products and materials are recognized when title passes. For export sales, title generally passes at the border of the Russian Federation and the Company covers transportation expenses (except freight), duties and taxes on those sales. Revenues include excise taxes and customs duties (see Note 17).

 

Sales of support services are recognized as services are performed provided that the service price can be determined and collectability is reasonably assured.

 

Transportation Expenses

 

Transportation expenses recognized in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income represent all expenses incurred in the transportation of crude oil and petroleum products via the Transneft pipeline network, as well as by railway and other transport means. Transportation expenses also include all other shipping and handling costs.

 

Refinery Maintenance Costs

 

The Company recognizes the costs of overhauls and preventive maintenance performed with respect to oil refining assets as expenses when incurred.

 

Environmental Liabilities

 

Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized, depending upon their future economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and do not have a future economic benefit, are expensed. Liabilities for these expenditures are recorded on an undiscounted basis unless the aggregate amount of the obligation and the amount and timing of the cash payments are fixed or reliably determinable.

 

Guarantees

 

The fair value of a guarantee is determined and recorded as a liability at the time when the guarantee is issued. The initial guarantee amount is subsequently remeasured to reflect the changes in the underlying liability. The expense is included in the related line items of the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, based on the nature of the guarantee. When the likelihood of performing on a guarantee becomes probable, a liability is accrued, provided it is reasonably determinable on the basis of the facts and circumstances at that time.

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Comprehensive Income

 

The Company applies FASB ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, which establishes standards for the calculation and reporting of the Company's comprehensive income (net income plus all other changes in net assets from non-owner sources) and its components in consolidated financial statements.

 

Accounting for Buy/Sell Contracts

 

The Company applies FASB ASC 845, Nonmonetary Transactions, which requires that two or more legally separate exchange transactions with the same counterparty, including buy/sell transactions, are combined and considered as a single arrangement, when the transactions are entered into "in contemplation" of one another.

 

Accounting for Contingencies

 

Certain conditions may exist as of the date of these consolidated financial statements which may further result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. Management of the Company makes an assessment of such contingent liabilities which is based on assumptions and is a matter of opinion. In assessing loss contingencies relating to legal or tax proceedings that involve the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company, after consultation with legal or tax advisors, evaluates the perceived merits of any legal or tax proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

 

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability is accrued in the Company's consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

 

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the nature of the guarantee would be disclosed. However, in some instances in which disclosure is not otherwise required, the Company may disclose contingent liabilities or other uncertainties of an unusual nature which, in the judgment of management after consultation with its legal or tax counsel, may be of interest to shareholders or others.

 

Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities

 

Excise taxes are reported gross within sales and other operating revenues and taxes other than income taxes in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, while value-added tax is recorded net in taxes other than income tax liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

 

  

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Changes in Accounting Policies

 

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2010‑06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements ("ASU 2010‑06") that amends Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, of the FASB Codification. ASU 2010‑06 requires separate disclosure of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurement inputs and a description of the reasons for the transfers. Entity is also required to present separately information about purchases, issuance, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using Level 3 inputs. ASU 2010‑06 amends existing disclosure requirements in regards of level of disaggregation and inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about activity in Level 3 fair value measurements that are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted ASU 2010-06 from January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about activity in Level 3 fair value measurements that was adopted from January 1, 2011. Adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts ("ASU 2010-28") that amends Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, of the FASB Codification. For the reporting units with zero or negative carrying value, an entity is required to perform the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. An entity should consider any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted ASU 2010-28 from January 1, 2011. Adoption of ASU 2010-28 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations ("ASU 2010-29") that amends Topic 805, Business Combinations, of the FASB Codification. ASU 2010-29 specifies that an entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity in comparative period as though the business combination had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. ASU 2010-29 also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for business combinations occurred on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted ASU 2010-29 for business combinations occurred on or after January 1, 2011. Adoption of ASU 2010-29 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011‑02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor's Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring ("ASU 2011‑02") that amends Topic 310, Receivables, of the FASB Codification. ASU 2011-02 sets criteria of considering restructuring a trouble debt restructuring. The update also clarifies the guidance on creditor's evaluation of receivables according to the criteria. Adoption of ASU 2011-02 is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Company adopted ASU 2011-02 in the current consolidated financial statements. ASU 2011-02 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

 

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Recent Accounting Standards

 

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011‑03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements ("ASU 2011‑03") that amends Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing, of the FASB Codification. ASU 2011-03 removes from the assessment of effective control the criterion dealing with the transferor's ability to repurchase assets in the event of default by the transferee, and the related implementation guidance. ASU 2011-03 is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company is subject to ASU 2011-03 from January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect ASU 2011-03 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011‑04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs ("ASU 2011‑04") that amends Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, of the FASB Codification. ASU 2011-04 modifies the fair value measurement requirements and updates the wording to converge with IFRS. ASU 2011-04 is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company is subject to ASU 2011-04 from January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect ASU 2011-04 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011‑05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income ("ASU 2011‑05") that amends Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, of the FASB Codification. ASU 2011‑05 clarifies the options of separate or combined presentation of profits and losses and other comprehensive income, describes items grouping, profit tax presentation and other matters. ASU 2011-12 issued in December 2011 postpone effective date of ASU 2011-05 in part of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. All other requirements of ASU 2011-05 are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company is subject to ASU 2011-05 from January 1, 2012, except requirement on reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company does not expect ASU 2011-05 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011‑08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment ("ASU 2011‑08") that amends Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, of the FASB Codification. ASU 2011-08 provides an entity with the option to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely that the fair value of an investment is less than its carrying amount. If it is not more likely then performing the goodwill impairment test is unnecessary. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is subject to ASU 2011-08 from January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect ASU 2011-08 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In December 2011, The FASB issued ASU 2011‑11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities ("ASU 2011‑11") that amends Topic 210, Balance Sheet, of the FASB Codification. ASU 2011-11 introduces new disclosure requirements about offsetting assets and liabilities and related arrangements. ASU 2011-11 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is subject to ASU 2011-11 from January 1, 2013. The Company does not expect ASU 2011-11 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

3. Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31 comprise the following:

2011

2010

Cash on hand and at bank accounts in RUB

722

671

Cash on hand and at bank accounts in currencies other than RUB

1,914

843

Deposits

2,497

2,625

Other

39

15

Total cash and cash equivalents

5,172

4,154

 

Restricted cash as of December 31 comprises the following:

2011

2010

Obligatory reserve with the CBR

34

21

Offsetting account under joint venture agreement

with BP Group in Euro (Note 8)

83

-

Other restricted cash

-

9

Total restricted cash

117

30

 

The obligatory reserve with the CBR represents the amount deposited by the Company's subsidiary bank, VBRR, with the CBR for securing the current operating activity of the bank. Credit institutions are required to maintain a non-interest earning cash deposit (obligatory reserve) with the CBR, which amount depends on the level of funds raised by the credit institution and this amount has certain restrictions for use.

 

Cash accounts denominated in currencies other than RUB are primarily in US$.

 

Deposits are interest bearing and denominated primarily in RUB.

 

As part of its cash management and credit risk function, the Company regularly evaluates the creditworthiness of financial and banking institutions where it deposits cash. Banking relationships are primarily with Russian subsidiaries of international banking institutions and certain large Russian banks.

 

4. Short-Term Investments

 

Short-term investments as of December 31 comprise the following:

2011

2010

Short-term loans granted

48

1

Loans to related parties

117

70

Reverse repurchase agreements

687

403

Structured deposits (Note 24)

979

3,791

Held-to-maturity state bonds

4

-

Notes receivable, net

958

227

Trading securities

State and corporate bonds

603

727

Other

-

2

Available-for-sale securities

618

260

Bank deposits

641

1,333

Total short-term investments

4,655

6,814

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

4. Short-Term Investments (continued)

 

Reverse repurchase agreements are collateralized by trading securities at fair value as of December 31, 2011 in the amount of US$ 720 million (US$ 403 million as of December 31, 2010).

 

As of December 31, 2011, structured deposits are denominated in US$ and earn interest ranging from 5.1% to 7.0%. As of December 31, 2010, structured deposits are denominated in US$ and have interest rates ranging from 6.22% to 7.2%.

 

As of December 31, 2011 notes receivable include corporate notes receivable with nominal interest rates ranging from 3.84% to 7.10% with maturities ranging from January 2012 to December 2014 and nominally interest-free corporate notes receivable with weighted average effective interest rate of 6.39% with maturities ranging from January 2012 to February 2014. Long-term portion of notes receivable is included in Long-Term Investments (see Note 8). As of December 31, 2011 the current portion of notes receivable in the amount of US$ 131 million was considered as temporarily impaired therefore an allowance in the amount of US$ 37 million was created. As of December 31, 2010 notes receivable include corporate notes receivable with nominal interest rate of 4.25% with maturity in December 2012 and nominally interest-free corporate notes receivable with weighted average effective interest rate of 3.0% with maturity in June 2015.

 

As of December 31 trading securities comprise the following:

Type of security

2011

2010

Balance

Interest rate

Date of maturity

Balance

Interest rate

Date of maturity

State and municipal bonds

98

6.7% - 15.0%

December 2012 - February 2036

23

5.14% - 18.1%

April 2011 - February 2036

Corporate bonds

505

6.47% - 19.0%

February 2012 - October 2021

283

5.8% - 19.0%

February 2011 - June 2020

Bonds issued by CBR

(with weighted average effective interest rate)

-

-

-

421

3.52%

February 2011 - March 2011

Total

603

727

 

As of December 31 available-for-sale securities comprise the following:

Type of security

2011

2010

Balance

Interest rate

Date of maturity

Balance

Interest rate

Date of maturity

State bonds

(federal loan bonds issued by the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation)

141

6.1% - 11.3%

July 2012 - January 2016

41

4.59% - 6.85%

January 2011 - May 2015

Municipal bonds

30

8.0% - 17.9%

March 2012 - October 2021

26

8.75% - 18.0%

March 2012 - December 2014

Corporate bonds

300

6.25% - 13.0%

February 2013 - October 2021

180

6.75% - 18.0%

March 2011 - July 2020

Interest bearing corporate notes

123

9.0% - 12.0%

February 2012 - November 2012

13

4.5%

December 2013

Nominally interest-free promissory notes

(with weighted average effective interest rate)

24

2.06% - 6.66%

February 2012 - April 2013

-

-

-

Total

618

260

 

As of December 31, 2010, the corporate bonds in the amount of US$ 31 million were pledged under repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2011 the Company does not have liabilities under repurchase agreements. Amortized cost bases of available-for-sale securities approximate their fair values.

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

4. Short-Term Investments (continued)

 

As of December 31, 2011, the bank deposits are primarily denominated in US$ and earn interest ranging from 3.0% to 7.25%. As of December 31, 2010, bank deposits are primarily denominated in US$ and have interest rates ranging from 4.7% to 8.0%.

 

5. Accounts Receivable, net

 

Accounts receivable as of December 31 comprise the following:

2011

2010

Trade receivables

5,687

4,077

Value-added tax and excise receivable (Note 22)

1,937

2,126

Other taxes

345

283

Banking loans to customers

748

789

Other

464

375

Less: allowance for doubtful accounts

(145)

(138)

Total accounts receivable, net

9,036

7,512

 

The Company's trade accounts receivable are denominated primarily in US$. Credit risk is managed through the use of letters of credit. Credit risk for domestic sales of petroleum products is managed through the use of bank guarantees for receivables repayment.

 

6. Inventories

 

Inventories as of December 31 comprise the following:

2011

2010

Materials and supplies

764

451

Crude oil and associated gas

1,469

595

Petroleum products and petrochemicals

1,778

1,065

Total inventories

4,011

2,111

 

Materials and supplies mostly include spare parts. Petroleum products and petrochemicals include those designated for sale as well as for own use. As of December 31, 2011 crude oil and associated gas, petroleum products and petrochemicals included oil for processing at Ruhr Oel GmbH ("ROG") and oil products produced at ROG (see Note 8).

 

7. Prepayments and Other Current Assets

 

Prepayments and other current assets as of December 31 comprise the following:

2011

2010

Prepayments to suppliers

743

665

Prepaid customs duties

1,600

1,315

Insurance prepayments

7

6

Derivatives (Note 24)

3

77

Other

82

93

Total prepayments and other current assets

2,435

2,156

 

Prepaid customs duties represent export duties related to the export of crude oil and petroleum products (see Note 17).

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

8. Long-Term Investments

 

Long-term investments as of December 31 comprise the following:

2011

2010

Equity method investments

Ruhr Oel GmbH

1,652

-

OJSC Tomskneft VNK

1,159

1,334

LLC Polar Lights Company

69

70

JV Rosneft-Shell Caspian Ventures Ltd.

21

19

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz

540

277

National Oil Consortium Ltd.

124

3

CJSC Vlakra

110

110

Taihu Ltd

267

-

Investments in power and utilities companies

94

190

Other

174

171

Total equity method investments

4,210

2,174

Available-for-sale securities

INTER RAO UES

146

-

Other securities in Company's banks

13

17

Held-to-maturity securities

Russian government bonds

40

49

Loans

Long-term loans

9

-

Long-term loans to equity investees

409

679

Notes receivable, net (long-term portion)

216

-

Cost method investments

16

17

Total long-term investments

5,059

2,936

 

As of December 31, 2011 the long-term portion of notes receivable in the amount of US$ 299 million was considered as temporarily impaired therefore an allowance in the amount of US$ 83 million was created.

 

Long-term loans to equity investees generally have contractual maturities from 3 to 8 years.

 

In March 2011, the registration of National Oil Consortium Ltd.'s ("NOC") equity capital increase was completed. The increase reflected a conversion of the Rosneft's earlier loan into contribution to NOC's equity. The Company's 20% ownership share in NOC did not change. NOC is involved in geological exploration of the Junin-6 block in Venezuela jointly with a subsidiary of Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., Venezuela's state oil company.

 

Equity share in profits/(losses) of material investments recorded using the equity method:

Participation

interest

(percentage) as of December 31, 2011

Share in income/(loss)

of equity investees

2011

2010

2009

Ruhr Oel GmbH

50.00

18

-

-

Taihu Ltd

51.00

267

-

-

LLC Polar Lights Company

50.00

26

16

26

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz

25.94

263

43

5

JV Rosneft-Shell Caspian Ventures Ltd.

51.00

2

3

2

OJSC Kubanenergo

27.97

(9)

(45)

-

OJSC Tomskneft VNK

50.00

12

38

147

Other

various

(2)

5

(68)

Total equity share in profits

577

60

112

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

8. Long-Term Investments (continued)

 

Ruhr Oel GmbH

 

In May 2011 the Company acquired 50% ownership interest in ROG. ROG is a joint venture with BP Group engaged in processing of crude oil in Western Europe.

 

OJSC Kubanenergo

 

During 2011 the Company concluded that an other than temporary decline in value of the investment in OJSC Kubanenergo exists and recognized loss in the amount of US$ 97 million, based on the quoted price of OJSC Kubanenergo's shares (see Note 24). This loss is presented within Other expenses in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Investments in OJSC Kubanenergo included into Investments in power and utilities companies.

 

OJSC Tomsk Distribution Company ("TDC")

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011 the Company concluded that an other than temporary decline in value of the investment in TDC exists and recognized loss in the amount of US$ 36 million, based on the quoted price of TDC's shares (see Note 24). This loss is presented within Other expenses in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Investments in TDC included into Investments in power and utilities companies.

 

OJSC Tomskneft VNK

 

OJSC Tomskneft VNK is a joint venture engaged in crude oil exploration and production in Western Siberia. The Shareholder Agreement provides that key decisions regarding the business operations of OJSC Tomskneft VNK shall be subject to unanimous approval by both participants and none of the participants has a preferential voting right. The investment in OJSC Tomskneft VNK includes goodwill of US$ 368 million.

 

LLC Polar Lights Company ("PLC")

 

PLC is a limited liability company owned 50% by Conoco Phillips Timan-Pechora Inc., and 50% by the Company. PLC is primarily engaged in the development of the Ardalin and satellite fields in the Timan-Pechora Basin located 125 kilometers to the South of the Barents Sea above the Arctic Circle.

 

JV Rosneft-Shell Caspian Ventures Ltd.

 

JV Rosneft-Shell Caspian Ventures Ltd. ("JV") is a joint venture in which the Company holds 51% interest. The Articles of Incorporation provide that key decisions regarding the business operations of the JV shall be subject to unanimous approval by both participants and none of the participants has a preferential voting right.

 

On December 6, 1996, the Company and the JV, entered into an agreement with eight oil and gas companies and government agencies of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan for the establishment of Caspian Pipeline Consortium ("CPC"). The purpose of the consortium is to design, finance, build and operate a pipeline from the oil fields located in Western Kazakhstan through Russia to the port of Novorossiysk. The interest of the JV in the CPC is 7.5%. In October 2001, the CPC pipeline commenced operation.

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

8. Long-Term Investments (continued)

 

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz

 

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz holds a licence for the development of Verkhnechonskoye oil and gas condensate deposit, which is the largest oil deposit in the Irkutsk region.

 

In 2008, commercial production began at the Verkhnechonskoye oil field. OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz is financed by the Company and other participant pro rata to their interest in share capital of the OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz.

 

CJSC Vlakra

 

CJSC Vlakra owns rights for certain land plot and office premises located in Moscow.

 

Sakhalin-1

 

The Company's primary investment in production sharing agreements ("PSA") is through the Sakhalin-1 project ("PSA 1"), which is operated by ExxonMobil, one of the PSA participants. The Company has a 20% interest in this unincorporated joint venture, which is accounted for under proportional consolidation method.

 

Taihu Ltd / OJSC Udmurtneft

 

In November 2006, the Company acquired a 51% equity share in Taihu Ltd, a joint venture incorporated for holding interest in and strategic management of OJSC Udmurtneft. The Company paid 5,100 Cyprus Pounds (approximately US$ 11 thousand) for this investment which has been included within equity method investments. The other party to the joint venture is China Petrochemical Corporation ("Sinopec") with a respective share of 49%.

 

The Shareholder Agreement in respect of this joint venture stipulates that key decisions regarding its business shall be subject to unanimous approval by both participants and none of the participants has a preferential voting right.

 

In December 2006, Taihu Ltd, through its wholly owned subsidiary, acquired a 96.86% equity interest in OJSC Udmurtneft for US$ 3.5 billion.

 

OJSC Udmurtneft is located in the Volga-Ural region of the Russian Federation and holds the licences for the development of 24 productive oil and gas condensate deposits. OJSC Udmurtneft is a group of 17 companies.

 

Other Investments in Power and Utilities Companies

 

Investments in power and utilities companies primarily comprise investments in shares of electric power generation, transmission, distribution and maintenance companies located in the Tomsk region and in the south of Russia.

 

The Company acquired interests in OJSC Tomskenergo and OJSC Kubanenergo through the auctions for the sale of the assets of Yukos Oil Company that were held in May and July 2007. In 2007, OJSC Tomskenergo was merged into OJSC TGK-11. Following the conversion of OJSC Tomskenergo's shares as a result of the above merger, the Company's interest in the share capital of OJSC TGK-11 amounted to 5.28%. In September 2009, the Company received additional shares of OJSC TGK-11, increasing its share in OJSC TGK-11's total equity to 6.77%. As of December 31, 2010 investment in OJSC TGK-11 was included in disposal group and recorded as Assets Held For Sale in the consolidated balance sheet.

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

8. Long-Term Investments (continued)

 

Assets Held For Sale

 

In December 2010, the Company entered into a letter of intent to exchange its investment in one available-for-sale security and its interest in a number of equity investees and one subsidiary for noncontrolling interest in INTER RAO UES, Russian power and utility company. In May 2011, the exchange in respect of the Company's investment in one available-for-sale security and its interest in equity investees was completed, and the Company acquired 0.4% share in INTER RAO UES. In July 2011, the Company exchanged its 100% interest in the subsidiary for additional shares in INTER RAO UES. Immediately after the transaction Rosneft's share in INTER RAO UES's equity increased to 1.36%. As of December 31, 2011, the Company's investment in INTER RAO UES was accounted for as an available-for-sale security.

 

Ownership interest to be exchanged was accounted for as Assets Held For Sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010. The Company measured a disposal group at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and recognized a loss amounted to US$ 5 million and

US$ 31 million within Other expenses in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

9. Property, Plant and Equipment, net

 

Property, plant and equipment as of December 31 comprise the following:

Cost

Accumulated depreciation

Net carrying amount

2011

2010

2011

2010

2011

2010

Exploration and production

75,372

66,991

(23,497)

(18,784)

51,875

48,207

Refining, marketing

and distribution

18,871

15,344

(5,308)

(4,562)

13,563

10,782

Other activities

3,327

3,026

(1,017)

(825)

2,310

2,201

Total property, plant and equipment

97,570

85,361

(29,822)

(24,171)

67,748

61,190

 

During 2011, the Company purchased land plots that had previously been leased, and reclassified land leasehold rights in the amount of US$ 86 million from Intangible assets to Property, Plant and Equipment in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011.

During 2011 there was a decrease of freight rates and tariffs on the global transport services market. In this regard, the Company identified impairment indicators for its three twin-hull shuttle oil tankers, included in Other activities category of Property, Plant and Equipment. According to ASC 360-10-35, Property, Plant and Equipment: Subsequent Measurement, the Company compared carrying and fair value of these fixed assets. To measure the fair value the Company used market information on similar oil tankers. The Company recognized impairment loss in the amount of US$ 127 million within Other expenses in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

 

Exploration and production assets include costs to acquire unproved properties in the amount of US$ 4,192 million and US$ 4,104 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company plans to explore and develop the respective properties. The Company's management believes these costs are recoverable.

 

The Company used reserves data (see Supplementary oil and gas disclosure) to calculate depletion relating to oil and gas properties for 2011 and 2010 and for the assessment of impairment of oil and gas assets.

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

9. Property, Plant and Equipment, net (continued)

 

As described in Note 2, the Company calculates depletion using the unit-of-production method over proved or proved developed oil and gas reserves depending on the nature of the costs involved. The proved or proved developed reserves used in the unit of production method assume the extension of the Company's production licences beyond their current expiration dates until the end of the economic lives of the fields as discussed below in further detail. The Company's oil and gas fields are located principally in the Russian Federation. The Company obtains licences to explore and produce oil and gas from these fields from governmental agencies. The Company's existing production licences generally expire during the period from 2013 through 2051. Expiration dates of licences for the most significant fields are between 2013 and 2051, and the licence for the largest field, Priobskoye, expires in 2044. The economic lives of the major licenced fields extend significantly beyond these dates. Under Russian law, the Company is entitled to renew the licences through the end of the economic lives of the fields, provided certain conditions are met. The Subsurface Resources Administrator (Rosnedra) extends licences for a period of up to 25 years regardless of the expected life of a field. Article 10 of the Law "On Subsurface Resources" provides that a licence to use a field "shall be" extended at its scheduled termination at the initiative of the subsoil user if necessary to finish production of the field, provided that there are no violations of the conditions of the licence.

 

The legislative history of Article 10 indicates that the term "shall" replaced the term "may" in August 2004, clarifying that the subsoil user has an absolute right to extend the licence term so long as it has not violated the conditions of the licence. In 2007 - 2011, the Company extended 116 of its main production licences for a period of up to 25 years based on the expected life of each field. The Company's current production plans are based on the assumption, which management considers to be reasonably certain, that the Company will be able to extend all other existing licences. These plans have been designed on the basis that the Company will be producing crude oil through the economic lives of the fields and not with a view to exploiting the Company's reserves to maximum effect only through the licence expiration dates.

 

Accordingly, management has included all reserves that otherwise meet the standards for being characterized as "proved" and that the Company estimates it can produce through the economic lives of respective licensed fields to proved reserves in the supplementary information on oil and gas exploration and production activities of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

Proved reserves should generally be limited to those that can be produced through the licence expiration date unless there is a long and clear track record which supports the conclusion that extension of the licence will be granted as a matter of course. The Company believes that extension of the licences will occur as a matter of course as fully described above.

 

10. Leased Property, Plant and Equipment, net

 

The following is the analysis of property, plant and equipment under capital leases as of December 31, included within Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 9):

2011

2010

Oil and gas properties

30

27

Less: accumulated depletion

(8)

(6)

Oil and gas properties, net

22

21

Other property, plant and equipment

Plant and machinery

13

17

Vehicles

249

181

Total

262

198

Less: accumulated depreciation

(77)

(85)

Property, plant and equipment, net

185

113

Total net book value of leased property

207

134

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

10. Leased Property, Plant and Equipment, net (continued)

 

Below is the analysis of the repayment of capital lease obligations as of December 31, 2011:

2012

27

2013

21

2014

19

2015

18

2016 and after

154

Imputed interest

(55)

Present value of capital lease payments

184

 

The charge to income resulting from amortization of leased property, plant and equipment is included with Depreciation, depletion and amortization in consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for 2011, 2010 and 2009 in the amount of US$ 19 million, US$ 39 million and US$ 26 million, respectively.

 

Operating Leases

 

The total amount of operating lease expenses was as follows:

2011

2010

2009

Total lease expenses

(303)

(233)

(240)

Total sublease revenues

5

1

2

 

11. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of additional shares and interests in various entities in the refining, marketing and distribution segment and the exploration and production segment in the amounts of US$ 3,793 million and US$ 714 million, respectively, over the fair value of the corresponding acquired share in net assets.

 

In accordance with FASB ASC 350, Intangibles--Goodwill and Other, the Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill as of October 1, 2011 based on the assumptions as of that date. As a result of this annual test, no impairment of goodwill was identified.

 

Goodwill acquired through business combinations has been allocated to the reporting units being operating segments - the exploration and production segment and refining, marketing and distribution segment. In assessing whether goodwill has been impaired, the carrying amount of the reporting unit (including goodwill) was compared with the estimated fair value of the reporting unit.

 

The Company estimated fair value of the reporting units using a discounted cash flow model. The future cash flows were adjusted for risks specific to the asset and discounted using a discount rate, which represented the Company's post-tax weighted average cost of capital.

 

The Company's business plan, approved by the Company's Board of Directors, is the primary source of information for the determination of the reporting units' fair values. Business plan contains implicit forecasts for oil and natural gas production, refinery throughputs, sales volumes for various types of refined products, revenues, operating and capital expenditures. As an initial step in the preparation of these plans, various assumptions, such as oil prices, natural gas prices, refining margins, refined product margins and cost inflation rates, are set in the business plan. These assumptions take account of existing prices, US$ and RUB inflation rates, other macroeconomic factors and historical trends and variability.

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

11. Goodwill and Intangible Assets (continued)

 

In determining the fair value for each of the reporting units, cash flows for a period of 12 years have been discounted and aggregated with the reporting unit's terminal value.

 

For the purposes of impairment testing, the Company's Urals oil price assumptions were based on the forecasted quoted market prices.

 

Intangible assets as of December 31 comprise the following:

Cost

Accumulated amortization

Net carrying amount

2011

2010

2011

2010

2011

2010

Land leasehold rights

630

718

(157)

(125)

473

593

Rights to use trade- marks "Sochi 2014"

172

172

(78)

(47)

94

125

Rights to use technology in petrochemical production

90

-

-

-

90

-

Other

62

61

(17)

(12)

45

49

Total intangible assets

954

951

(252)

(184)

702

767

 

Land leasehold rights were purchased with the assets of the companies acquired in 2007 and are amortized on a straight line basis over an estimated average useful life of 20 years.

 

Rights to use "Sochi 2014" trademarks were acquired in the third quarter of 2009. The cost of these rights is amortized on a straight line basis over an estimated useful life of 5.5 years, which is the period the Company expects to benefit from these assets.

 

Rights to use technology in petrochemical production were acquired by the Company in 2011 in connection with the start of own petrochemical production construction in the Far East. Amortization of these rights is deferred through commencement of commercial operations.

 

Amortization of intangible assets charge is included with Depreciation, depletion and amortization in consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for 2011, 2010 and 2009 in the amounts of US$ 71 million, US$ 81 million and US$ 61 million, respectively.

 

The following represents the estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years for intangible assets subject to amortization:

2012

72

2013

72

2014

69

2015

37

2016

37

Total amortization expense for the five succeeding years

287

 

12. Other Non-Current Assets

 

Other non-current assets as of December 31 comprise the following:

2011

2010

Advances paid for capital construction

1,446

752

Debt issue costs

70

60

Prepaid insurance

48

17

Other, net

125

128

Total other non-current assets

1,689

957

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

13. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31 comprise the following:

2011

2010

Trade accounts payable

3,015

1,457

Salary and other benefits payable

521

442

Advances received

553

601

Dividends payable

4

10

Banking customer accounts

1,231

1,067

Accrued expenses

194

163

Other

303

121

Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities

5,821

3,861

 

The Company's accounts payable are primarily denominated in RUB.

 

14. Short-Term Loans and Long-Term Debt

 

Short-term loans and borrowings as of December 31 comprise the following:

2011

2010

Customer deposits - currencies other than RUB

109

86

Customer deposits - RUB denominated

452

271

Promissory notes payable

27

84

Promissory notes payable - Yukos related

1,237

1,312

Borrowings - RUB denominated - Yukos related

263

269

Repurchase agreements

-

27

Other borrowings

377

286

2,465

2,335

Current portion of long-term debt

2,269

3,163

Total short-term loans and borrowings and current portion of long-term debt

4,734

5,498

 

Customer deposits represent fixed-term deposits placed by customers with the Company's subsidiary banks. Сustomer deposits denominated in RUB bear interest rates ranging from 0.01% to 9.25% and those denominated in other currencies bear an interest ranging from 0.01% to 6.90%.

 

As of December 31, 2011, weighted average interest rate on promissory notes was 3.13%. The promissory notes are recorded at amortized cost.

 

Promissory notes payable - Yukos related represent financing originally received from the entities that were related to Yukos Oil Company on the debt issue date. The promissory notes are primarily payable on demand and bear interest ranging from 0% to 18%. The promissory notes are recorded at amortized cost.

 

RUB denominated borrowings - Yukos related primarily include borrowings provided by Yukos Capital S.a.r.l., which bear interest of 9% and matured at the end of 2007. The Company partially repaid these liabilities following the court order (see Note 22).

 

In 2011, the Company received cash under the repurchase agreements and recorded these transactions as financing secured by the corporate bonds owned by the Company. As of December 31, 2011, the Company does not have liabilities under repurchase agreements.

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

14. Short-Term Loans and Long-Term Debt (continued)

 

In 2011, the Company wrote off unclaimed promissory notes where statute of limitations expired and recognized gain in the amount of US$ 4 million in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income within Other income.

 

Long-term debt as of December 31 comprises the following:

2011

2010

Bank loans - currencies other than RUB

20,502

20,690

Bank loans raised for funding the acquisition of

OJSC Yuganskneftegaz - US$ denominated

-

110

Customer deposits - currencies other than RUB

68

44

Customer deposits - RUB denominated

165

277

Promissory notes payable

3

69

Other borrowings

88

30

20,826

21,220

Current portion of long-term debt

(2,269)

(3,163)

Total long-term debt

18,557

18,057

 

As of December 31, 2011, the interest rates on the Company's long-term bank loans denominated in currencies other than RUB ranged from LIBOR plus 0.58% to 4.35%. These bank loans are primarily secured by contracts for the export of crude oil.

 

In December 2011, Rosneft received cash under a syndicated long-term floating rate debt agreement with foreign banks in the amount of US$ 1.4 billion and EUR 0.47 billion. The debt is repayable within 5 years.

 

As of December 31, 2011, the bank loan raised for funding the acquisition of OJSC Yuganskneftegaz was fully repaid.

 

As of December 31, 2011, customer deposits represent fixed-term deposits placed by customers with the Company's subsidiary banks. The RUB-denominated deposits bear interest ranging from 0.01% to 14.50%. Deposits denominated in currencies other than RUB bear interest of 0.5075% to 14.500%.

 

As of December 31, 2011, weighted average interest rate on promissory notes payable was 13.07%. The promissory notes are recorded at amortized cost.

 

Generally, long-term loans are secured by oil export contracts. Typically, under the terms of such contracts, the lender is provided with a direct right to claim contractual revenue which must be remitted directly to a transit currency (US$ denominated) accounts with those banks, should the Company fail to make timely debt repayments.

 

The Company is obliged to comply with a number of restrictive financial and other covenants contained within its debt agreements. Restrictive covenants include maintaining certain financial ratios.

 

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company is in compliance with all restrictive financial and other covenants contained within its debt agreements.

 

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

14. Short-Term Loans and Long-Term Debt (continued)

 

The scheduled aggregate maturity of long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2011 is as follows:

2012

2,269

2013

908

2014

1,248

2015

1,665

2016 and after

14,736

Total long-term debt

20,826

 

15. Income and Other Tax Liabilities

 

Income and other tax liabilities as of December 31 comprise the following

2011

2010

Mineral extraction tax

1,285

1,103

Value-added tax

399

347

Excise tax

232

135

Personal income tax

15

16

Property tax

88

66

Income tax

79

205

Other

48

99

Total income and other tax liabilities

2,146

1,971

 

Tax liabilities above include restructured tax liabilities (see Note 20).

 

16. Shareholders' Equity

 

In April 2011, the Company purchased 11,296,701 of its own shares for RUB 2.9 billion or RUB 258 per share, which corresponds to US$ 103.6 million or US$ 9.17 per share at the CBR official exchange rate on the transaction date.

 

On June 10, 2011, the annual general shareholders' meeting approved dividends on the Rosneft's common shares for 2010 in the amount of RUB 29.3 billion or RUB 2.76 per share, which corresponds to US$ 1.06 billion or US$ 0.1 per share at the CBR official exchange rate at the approval date. US$ 964 million of the above relate to outstanding shares, including tax on dividends on treasury shares of US$ 9 million.

 

Result of Transactions with Related Parties under Common Control

 

In July 2011, the Company completed the exchange of share in its subsidiary for shares in INTER RAO UES (see Note 8). The net result of the exchange amounted to US$ 89 million gain, net of income tax effect of US$ 22 million. The Company recorded this result, net of income tax effect, as a component of additional paid-in capital, as the transaction was with a related party under common control.

 

Amounts Available for Distribution to Shareholders

 

In 2011 the Company acquired additional shares in its two subsidiaries. The effect of these transactions in the total amount of US$ 300 million was accounted for as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

16. Shareholders' Equity (continued)

 

Amounts Available for Distribution to Shareholders

 

Amounts available for distribution to shareholders are based on Rosneft Oil Company's statutory accounts prepared in accordance with Russian accounting standards, which differ significantly from US GAAP (see Note 2). Russian legislation identifies the basis of distribution as the current period net profit calculated in accordance with statutory accounting standards. According to Russian legislation, dividends cannot exceed the accounting income for the reporting year.

 

17. Export Customs Duty

 

Export customs duty for the years ended December 31 comprises the following:

2011

2010

2009

Export customs duty on oil and gas sales

20,847

13,031

9,441

Export customs duty on petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

6,035

3,712

2,690

Total export customs duty

26,882

16,743

12,131

 

18. Income and Other Taxes

 

Income tax expenses for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

2011

2010

2009

Current income tax expense

3,306

2,897

2,106

Deferred income tax benefit

(189)

(253)

(106)

Total income tax expense

3,117

2,644

2,000

 

The Company does not file a consolidated tax return, rather each legal entity files separate tax returns with various authorities, primarily in the Russian Federation.

 

Temporary differences between these consolidated financial statements and tax records gave rise to the following deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of December 31:

2011

2010

Deferred income tax asset arising from tax effect of:

Asset retirement obligations

266

209

Property, plant and equipment

72

54

Prepayments and other current assets

26

18

Accounts receivable

20

31

Accounts payable and accruals

107

82

Inventories

7

9

Investments

65

34

Interest swap contract

34

39

Tax loss carry forward

44

Other

93

96

Total deferred tax asset

734

572

Valuation allowance for deferred income tax asset

(300)

(273)

Deferred income tax asset, net

434

299

Deferred income tax liability arising from tax effect of:

Mineral rights

(2,209)

(2,409)

Property, plant and equipment and other

(2,571)

(2,585)

Deferred income tax liability

(4,780)

(4,994)

Net deferred income tax liability

(4,346)

(4,695)

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

18. Income and Other Taxes (continued)

 

Classification of deferred taxes:

2011

2010

Current deferred tax assets

216

174

Non-current deferred tax assets

218

125

Current deferred tax liabilities

(127)

(86)

Non-current deferred tax liabilities

(4,653)

(4,908)

 

Although the Company does not pay tax on a consolidated basis, a reconciliation of expected income tax expense to the actual tax expense for the years ended December 31 is as follows:

2011

2010

2009

Income before income taxes and minority interest

15,706

13,316

8,519

Statutory income tax rate

20%

20%

20%

Theoretical income tax expense

3,141

2,663

1,704

Add/(deduct) tax effect of:

Change in valuation allowance

27

50

(15)

Effect of income tax relieves

(200)

(331)

(175)

Adjustments of income tax for prior periods

-

-

4

Unrecognized income tax benefits

(28)

20

2

Permanent accounting differences arising from:

Non-deductible items, net

94

362

493

Foreign exchange effects, net

(21)

(20)

(90)

Accrued tax interest

-

3

-

Other

104

(103)

77

Income taxes

3,117

2,644

2,000

 

The effect of income tax relieves represents the impact of lower income tax rates for Rosneft and certain of its subsidiaries under applicable regional laws. These laws provide that the income tax exemptions, ranging from 4% to 4.5%, are granted to oil and gas producing companies which make capital investments, agreed with regional administrations, within the respective region and participate in various social projects, as well as to refining companies and to companies engaged in sale of petroleum products. These exemptions are granted in various regions on an annual or monthly basis.

 

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company analyzed its tax positions for uncertainties affecting recognition and measurement thereof. Following the analysis, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the majority of deductible tax positions stated in the income tax return would be sustained upon the examination by the tax authorities. This is supported by the results of the examinations of the income tax returns which have been conducted to date.

 

In addition to income tax, the Company incurred other taxes as follows:

2011

2010

2009

Mineral extraction tax

14,022

9,051

6,502

Excise tax

1,873

1,105

893

Property tax

390

284

236

Other

626

480

430

Total taxes other than income tax

16,911

10,920

8,061

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

19. Asset Retirement Obligations

 

The movement of asset retirement obligations is as follows:

2011

2010

Asset retirement obligations as of the beginning of the reporting period

2,328

1,772

Recognition of additional obligations for new wells

99

88

Accretion expense

146

107

Increase as a result of changes in estimates

104

383

Spending on existing obligations

(35)

(22)

Asset retirement obligations as of the end of the reporting period

2,642

2,328

 

Asset retirement obligations represent an estimate of costs of wells liquidation, recultivation of sand pits, slurry ponds, disturbed lands and dismantling pipelines and power transmission lines.

 

20. Other Non-Current Liabilities

 

Other non-current liabilities as of December 31 comprise the following:

 

2011

2010

Restructured tax liabilities

-

1,020

Long-term lease obligations

166

97

Deferred income

-

20

Liabilities to municipalities under amicable agreements

29

51

Liabilities for rights to use trademarks "Sochi 2014" (Note 11)

24

38

Environmental remediation liability

85

111

Other

17

2

Total other non-current liabilities

321

1,339

 

Under the tax restructuring plan, the restructured tax liabilities should have been repaid quarterly within five years starting from March 2008. The Company's payments excluding interest amounted to RUB 15.9 billion and RUB 6.4 billion (US$ 512.2 million and US$ 210.4 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of the payment dates) for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In October 2011, the Company early repaid the principal amount of tax liabilities for a total amount of RUB 8.5 billion (US$ 259 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of the payment date), and in view of that the Company made a write-off of the major part of the restructured tax liabilities in the total amount of RUB 22.2 billion (US$ 718.1 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of the date of the write-off). The Company recognized income on the extinguishment of restructured tax liabilities within Other income in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2011, remaining balance of the restructured tax liabilities is included in current liabilities in the amount of RUB 1.6 billion (US$ 49.0 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2011).

 

The Company intends to undertake all possible actions to comply with the tax restructuring plan in full.

 

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, total accrued environmental remediation liabilities were US$ 123 million and US$ 145 million, respectively, of which US$ 38 million and US$ 34 million, respectively, were included in Accrued expenses (see Note 13). Environmental remediation liabilities will be settled over four years and are discounted using 11% discount rate.

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

21. Related Party Transactions

 

In the normal course of business the Company enters into transactions with other parties which are directly or indirectly controlled by the Russian Government. Such enterprises are OJSC Gazprom, OJSC Russian Railways, OJSC Sberbank, Vnesheconombank, OJSC Bank VTB, ОJSC Gazprombank, OJSC AK Transneft, certain power and utility companies, and federal agencies, including tax authorities.

 

Total amounts of transactions and balances with companies controlled by the Russian Government for each of the reporting periods ending December 31, as well as related party balances as of December 31 are provided in the tables below:

2011

2010

2009

Revenues and Income

Oil and gas sales

967

248

164

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

849

644

293

Support services and other revenues

53

50

103

Interest income

244

228

95

2,113

1,170

655

Costs and expenses

Production and operating expenses

339

173

192

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

6,172

4,152

3,054

Other expenses

227

3

69

Interest expense

1

8

109

Banking fees

11

9

12

6,750

4,345

3,436

Other operations

Sale of short-term and long-term investments

48

-

505

Purchase of short-term and long-term investments

306

21

31

Proceeds from short-term and long-term debt

-

-

2

Repayment of short-term and long-term debt

112

1,412

3,466

Borrowings issued

36

-

-

Deposits placed

991

3,466

1,897

Deposits withdrawn

5,684

797

86

 

December 31,

2011

December 31,

2010

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

1,703

2,520

Accounts receivable

371

171

Prepayments and other current assets

486

502

Short-term and long-term investments

342

4,444

2,902

7,637

Liabilities

Accounts payable

48

50

Short-term and long-term debt (including interest)

4

114

52

164

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

21. Related Party Transactions (continued)

 

Total amounts of transactions with related parties (except for those controlled by the Russian Government), which are primarily equity investees and joint ventures, for each of the reporting periods ending December 31, as well as related party balances as of December 31 are provided in the tables below:

 

2011

2010

2009

Revenues and Income

Oil and gas sales

53

43

27

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

171

130

115

Support services and other revenues

307

203

336

Interest income

35

36

27

Dividends received

30

37

178

596

449

683

Costs and expenses

Production and operating expenses

315

343

261

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

2,714

1,480

1,342

Other expenses

357

111

218

Interest expense

1

3

-

3,387

1,937

1,821

Other operations

Purchase of short-term and long-term investments

168

8

121

Proceeds from short-term and long-term debt

1

1

78

Repayment of short-term and long-term debt

47

141

1

Loans issued

11

162

69

Repayment of borrowings issued

216

4

3

 

December 31,2011

December 31,2010

Assets

Accounts receivable

269

247

Prepayments and other current assets

9

9

Short-term and long-term investments

500

460

778

716

Liabilities

Accounts payable

269

132

Short-term and long-term debt (including interest)

208

258

477

390

 

22. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Russian Business Environment

Russia continues economic reforms and development of its legal, tax and regulatory frameworks as required by a market economy. The future stability of the Russian economy is largely dependent upon these reforms and developments and the effectiveness of economic, financial and monetary measures undertaken by the government.

 

The Russian economy is vulnerable to market downturns and economic slowdowns elsewhere in the world. In 2010 and throughout 2011 the Russian Government continued to take measures to support the economy in order to overcome the consequences of the global financial crisis. Despite some indications of recovery there continues to be uncertainty regarding further economic growth, access to capital and cost of capital, which could negatively affect the Company's future consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations and business prospects.

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

22. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

 

Russian Business Environment (continued)

 

While management believes it is taking appropriate measures to support the sustainability of the Company's business in the current circumstances, unexpected further deterioration in the areas described above could negatively affect the Company's consolidated results and consolidated financial position in a manner not currently determinable.

 

Taxation

 

Legislation and regulations regarding taxation in Russia continue to evolve. Various legislation and regulations are not always clearly written and their interpretation is subject to the opinions of the local, regional and national tax authorities. Instances of inconsistent opinions are not unusual.

 

The current regime of penalties and interest related to reported and discovered violations of Russia's laws, decrees and related regulations is severe. Interest and penalties are levied when an understatement of a tax liability is discovered. As a result, the amounts of penalties and interest can be significant in relation to the amounts of unreported taxes.

 

Russian tax returns remain open and subject to inspection for a period of up to three years. The fact that a year has been reviewed does not close that year, or any tax return applicable to that year, from further review during the three-year period.

 

Current Russian transfer pricing rules were introduced in 1999, giving Russian tax authorities the right to make transfer pricing adjustments and impose additional tax liabilities in respect of all controlled transactions, provided that the transaction price deviates from the market price by more than 20%. Controlled transactions include transactions between related entities and certain other types of transactions between independent parties, such as foreign trade transactions and transactions with significant (by more than 20%) price fluctuations.

 

The current transfer pricing rules are vaguely drafted, leaving wide scope for interpretation by Russian tax authorities and courts. Due to the uncertainties in interpretation of transfer pricing legislation, the tax authorities may challenge the Company's prices and propose an adjustment. If such price adjustments are upheld by the Russian courts and implemented, it could have an adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations. The Company finances its subsidiaries by various means which may lead to transfer pricing tax risks. The Company's management believes that the related tax positions are sustainable and will not have any significant negative impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

 

Effective January 1, 2012 the market price defining rules were changed and the list of entities that could be recognized as interdependent entities and list of managed deals were expanded. Due to above new rules, absence of law enforcement precedents, and certain contradictions of the new law, such new rules could not be considered as well defined. The Company's management is in the process of developing a new approach to assess consequences of the new tax rules, to prevent substantial negative impact on the Company's financial statements.

 

During 2010 and 2011, the tax authorities continued examinations of the Company and its subsidiaries for 2007-2010 fiscal years. The Company does not expect results of the examinations to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations. Tax years or periods prior to 2007 are not subject to examination.

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

22. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

 

Taxation (continued)

 

As of December 31, 2010, there was a possible risk that RUB 1.2 billion (US$ 39 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2010) of VAT receivable would not be recovered. As of December 31, 2011, the amount of possible risk of unrecoverable VAT decreased to an insignificant level as a result of positive court decisions, as well as actual VAT reimbursements by tax authorities.

 

Management of the Company believes that the outcome of the above tax risks will not have significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations. Overall, management believes that the Company has paid or accrued all taxes that are applicable. For taxes other than income tax, where uncertainty exists, the Company has accrued tax liabilities based on management's best estimate of the probable outflow of resources, which will be required to settle these liabilities. Possible liabilities which were identified by management at the balance sheet dates as those that can be subject to different interpretations of the tax laws and regulations are not accrued in the consolidated financial statements.

 

Capital Commitments

 

The Company and its subsidiaries are engaged in ongoing capital projects for exploration and development of production facilities and modernization of refineries and the distribution network. The budgets for these projects are generally set on an annual basis. Depending on the current market situation, actual expenditures may vary from the budgeted amounts.

 

The Company has contractual obligations for capital construction and fixed assets acquisition as of December 31, 2011, which amounted to RUB 195.4 billion (US$ 6.1 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2011).

 

Environmental Matters

 

Due to the nature of its business, Rosneft and its subsidiaries are subject to federal legislation regulating environmental protection. The majority of environmental liabilities arise as a result of air pollution, accidental leaks that pollute land and placement of oil waste. The Company considers fines paid and other environmental liabilities as immaterial, given the scale of its operations.

 

In the course of its operations, the Company seeks to comply with international environmental standards and monitors compliance therewith on a regular basis. With a view to improve environmental activities, the Company takes specific measures to mitigate the adverse impact of its current operations on the environment.

 

Legislation that regulates environmental protection in the Russian Federation is evolving, and the Company evaluates its liabilities in accordance therewith. Currently it is not possible to reasonably estimate the liabilities of the Company which may be incurred should the legislation be amended.

 

Management believes that, based on the existing legislation, the Company is unlikely to have liabilities that need to be accrued in addition to the amounts already recognized in the consolidated financial statements and that may have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operating results or financial position of the Company.

 

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

22. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

 

Social and Sponsorship Expenses

 

The Company is required to maintain certain social infrastructure assets (not owned by the Company and not recorded in the consolidated financial statements) as well as to incur other social and sponsorship costs. The main categories of social costs are health care, education and science, sports activities, culture, and support of war veterans and disabled persons. Charity and sponsorship activities are conducted in collaboration with regional administration and non-governmental charity organizations.

 

The Company is involved in Russia's social and cultural heritage revival programs. The Company receives certain regional tax incentives enabling it to further develop its business.

 

The Company incurred US$ 153 million, US$ 45 million and US$ 30 million in social expenses, US$ 269 million, US$ 71 million and US$ 168 million in charity and sponsorship expenses in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These expenses are presented within Other expenses in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

 

Pension Plans

 

The Company and its subsidiaries make payments to the State Pension Fund of the Russian Federation. These payments are calculated by the employer as percentage from the salary and are expensed as accrued.

 

The Company also maintains a defined contribution corporate pension plan to finance non-state pensions of its employees. Under this plan, in 2011, 2010 and 2009 the Company made and expensed contributions amounting to US$ 95 million, US$ 90 million and US$ 95 million, respectively.

 

Guarantees and Indemnity

 

As of December 31, 2011, Rosneft and certain subsidiaries provided guarantees for certain debt agreements of other Rosneft subsidiaries. In accordance with the debt agreements, the guarantors obliged to perform on the guarantee and to pay the bank all amounts of outstanding guaranteed liabilities, including interest.

 

The Company cannot substitute guarantees issued by any novation agreement or mutual offset. The Company's obligations under guarantees issued are valid in case of any change in the loan agreements. After the full payment and settlement of all obligations under the guarantees, Rosneft has the right to subrogate its respective part of all bank claims against the debtor in accordance with the loan agreements. In the event Rosneft makes payments under guarantees issued, it has a right to claim the amounts paid from the debtor.

 

In November 2009, Rosneft entered into a guarantee agreement in respect of all the obligations ofRN-Tuapse Refinery LLC, a Rosneft's wholly owned subsidiary, under the contract for delivery of power generating units with Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery AB for the period through September 30, 2012, in the amount of 960 million Swedish krona (US$ 139 million at the CBR based cross-rate as of December 31, 2011). In November 2009, Rosneft entered into a debt agreement with a western bank to finance the above delivery contract.

 

In September 2011, Rosneft entered into a guarantee agreement in respect of all the obligations ofNeftepromleasing LLC, a Rosneft's wholly owned subsidiary, under the contract for purchase of oil and gas equipment through September 30, 2016, in the amount of US$ 500 million. In September 2011, LLC Neftepromleasing entered into a debt agreement with foreign banks to finance the purchase contract. In October 2011, Neftepromleasing LLC fully drew down under this debt agreement.

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

22. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

 

Litigations, Claims and Assessments

 

In 2006, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l., a former subsidiary of Yukos Oil Company, initiated arbitral proceedings against OJSC Yuganskneftegaz, which was subsequently merged into the Company, and OJSC Samaraneftegaz, the Company's subsidiary, in various arbitration courts alleging default under six ruble-denominated loans. The International Commercial Arbitration Court (the "ICAC") at the Russian Federation Chamber of Commerce and Industry issued four arbitration awards in favor of Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. against Yuganskneftegaz concerning four of the loans in the aggregate amount of RUB 12.9 billion (US$ 401 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2011). Arbitration panel formed pursuant to the International Chamber of Commerce ("ICC") rules issued an award against OJSC Samaraneftegaz in the amount of RUB 3.1 billion (US$ 96 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2011) in loan principal and interest plus post award interest of 9% p.a. on the above amount of loan principal and interest concerning the two other loans.

 

In 2007, the Company successfully challenged the ICAC awards and the ICAC awards were set aside by the Russian courts, including the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian Federation. Yukos Capital S.a.r.l., nevertheless, sought to enforce the ICAC awards in the Netherlands. The district court in Amsterdam refused to enforce the ICAC awards on the ground that they were properly set aside by a competent court. Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. appealed and on April 28, 2009 the Amsterdam Court of Appeal reversed the district court judgment and allowed Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. to enforce the ICAC awards in the Netherlands. The Company sought review of the decision of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court of the Netherlands.

 

In early 2010, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. filed an additional lawsuit against the Company in the High Court of Justice in London, seeking enforcement of the ICAC awards in England and Wales, as well as interest on those awards.

 

On June 25, 2010, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands declared inadmissible the Company's appeal of the decision of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal enforcing the ICAC awards in the Netherlands. Although the Company does not agree with the decisions of the Dutch courts noted above, on August 11, 2010 it complied with those decisions and arranged for relevant payments to be made with respect to the claim against the Company.

 

In addition to the amounts paid, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. continues to seek statutory interest in the High Court of Justice in London in the amount of approximately US$ 160 million as of the date of its Particulars of Claim. On June 14, 2011, the High Court issued an interim decision on two preliminary issues it had agreed to consider prior to reaching a decision on the merits of the claim. Although Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. prevailed on both issues, the court granted the Company leave to appeal. On July 5, 2011 the Company submitted its notice of appeal, followed by filing of the skeleton appeal brief on July 19, 2011. A hearing at the English Court of Appeal has been scheduled for March 2012. Once the Company's appeal is decided, a timetable for the trial will be set. The Company intends to defend its position vigorously in the remaining proceedings in England.

 

In 2007, lawsuits with Russian arbitrazh courts in Moscow and Samara were filed to nullify the loan agreements with Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. Court hearings in both cases were suspended for some time. However, on July 29, 2011 the Arbitrazh Court of the Samara Region reopened its proceedings and at a hearing on February 1, 2012 declared invalid the loan agreements between Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. and OJSC Samaraneftegaz. The Moscow Arbitrazh Court has recently scheduled a hearing for February 21, 2012 to consider whether it should reopen the relevant proceedings as well.

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

22. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

 

Litigations, Claims and Assessments (continued)

 

On July 2, 2010, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. filed a petition with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "U.S. S.D.N.Y.") seeking confirmation of the ICC award against OJSC Samaraneftegaz noted above. In August 2010 Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. also commenced proceedings in the Arbitrazh Court of the Samara Region seeking enforcement of the same award in the Russian Federation.

 

On October 15, 2010, OJSC Samaraneftegaz filed a motion with the U.S. S.D.N.Y. requesting the court to either dismiss Yukos Capital S.a.r.l.'s petition or, alternatively, to stay the action pending resolution of the contemporaneous Russian enforcement proceedings. At a hearing held on January 7, 2011, the court granted this motion and stayed the action pending completion of the proceedings in the courts in the Russian Federation. Yukos Capital S.a.r.l.'s subsequent motion for reconsideration was denied.

 

On February 15, 2011, the Arbitrazh Court of the Samara Region denied Yukos Capital S.a.r.l.'s enforcement application. The time for cassation appeal from the ruling has lapsed without Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. having filed such an appeal. On May 13, 2011, the U.S. S.D.N.Y. lifted the January 7, 2011 stay and ordered limited discovery solely on the issue of whether the U.S. S.D.N.Y has jurisdiction to consider Yukos Capital S.a.r.l.'s petition. On January 20, 2012 OJSC Samaraneftegaz filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of personal jurisdiction. Yukos Capital S.a.r.l.'s response is currently expected to be filed in February, 2012.

 

The Company and its subsidiary participate in arbitral proceedings related to bankruptcy of OJSC Sakhaneftegaz and OJSC Lenaneftegaz for the recovery of certain loans and guarantees of indemnity in the amount of RUB 1,286 million (US$ 40 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2011), stated above account receivable was reserved in full.

 

During 2008 - 2010, the Federal Antimonopoly Service ("FAS Russia") and its regional bodies claimed that Rosneft and certain subsidiaries violated certain antimonopoly regulations in relation to petroleum products trading. The Company appealed all claims in relevant arbitrazh courts. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, court proceedings on the majority of cases had ended. Among other things, on December 1, 2010, the Moscow Arbitrazh court reduced the RUB 5.3 billion fine, imposed on the Company by FAS Russia in 2009, to RUB 2 billion (US$ 62 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2011).

 

The fine was paid in December 2010. During the hearing on February 25, 2011, the Moscow Arbitrazh court accepted Rosneft's retraction of an appeal of FAS Russia's decision, order and disposition made in relation to the Company in 2008 in a single case. The proceedings under this case are terminated. The court ruling on dismissal of the case and, consequently, the decision of FAS Russia to impose an administrative penalty came in force on March 25, 2011. As a result, on April 22, 2011, the Company paid a fine in the amount of RUB 1.5 billion (US$ 54 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of the date of payment).

 

As of December 31, 2011, the total amount of administrative penalties claimed by FAS Russia and its regional bodies in respect of Rosneft and its subsidiaries, assessed in the total amount of RUB 2,137 million (US$ 66 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2011), including decision received in January 2012 to claim administrative responsibility in the form of penalties in relation to Rosneft and one of its subsidiary in the amount of RUB 1,756 million (US$ 55 million at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2011). To the extent probable, this contingent liability is accrued in these consolidated financial statements.

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

22. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

 

Litigations, Claims and Assessments (continued)

 

Rosneft and its subsidiaries are involved in other litigations which arise from time to time in the course of their business activities. The Company's management believes that the ultimate result of these litigations will not significantly affect the operating results or financial position of the Company.

 

Licence Agreements

 

In accordance with certain exploration license agreements or separate agreements concluded with the local and regional authorities, the Company is required to maintain certain levels of expenditures for environmental protection, as well as maintain certain level of capital expenditures. Generally these expenditures are within the normal operating and capital budgets and are accounted for when incurred in accordance with existing accounting policies for respective costs and expenses.

 

Oil Supplies

 

In February 2009, Rosneft entered into a long-term crude oil sale contract for the term from January 2011 through December 2030 with China National Petroleum Corporation ("CNPC") for the total volume of 180 million tons of crude oil to be delivered via pipeline to China. The contract is based on customary commercial terms with an agreed formula linked to market prices. Subsequently, CNPC assigned all its rights, title and interest in this contract to China National United Oil Corporation.

 

In April 2009, Rosneft entered into a long-term crude oil sale contract for the term from January 2011 through December 2030 with OJSC AK Transneft for the total volume of 120 million tons of crude oil to be delivered via pipeline to China. The contract is based on customary commercial terms with an agreed formula linked to market prices.

 

BP Share Swap

 

On January 14, 2011 the Company and BP p.l.c. ("BP") entered into a share swap agreement ("the Share Swap"), whereby BP planned to issue 988,694,683 ordinary shares in exchange for 1,010,158,003 Rosneft's shares. Closing of the Share Swap was stipulated to take place on or before April 14, 2011. On April 13, 2011, the Company, without waiving any of its rights, extended the Share Swap completion deadline through May 16, 2011. On May 16, 2011, the Share Swap was terminated. There was no effect of the Share Swap termination in the consolidated financial statements.

 

Strategic Partnership with ExxonMobil

 

In August 2011, Rosneft and ExxonMobil executed a Strategic Cooperation Agreement under which the companies plan to undertake joint exploration and development of hydrocarbon resources in Russia, USA and other countries throughout the world, and to commence technology and expertise sharing activities. The agreement includes approximately US$ 3.2 billion to be spent funding exploration and development of East Prinovozemelskiy Blocks 1, 2 and 3 in the Kara Sea and the Tuapse Trough License Block in the Black Sea according to final contracts to be signed by the parties based on principles set in the Strategic Cooperation Agreement. Additionally, the agreement provides the Company with an opportunity to acquire equity interest in a number of ExxonMobil's exploration and operating assets in North America, including offshore fields in the Gulf of Mexico, tight oil fields in Texas, USA, Canada and several projects in other countries. The companies have also agreed to conduct a joint study of developing tight oil resources in Western Siberia.

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

23. Segment Information

 

Presented below is information about the Company's operating segments in accordance with FASB ASC 280, Segment Reporting. The Company determines its operating segments based on the nature of their operations. The performance of these operating segments is assessed by management on a regular basis. The exploration and production segment is engaged in field exploration and development and production of crude oil and natural gas. The refining, marketing and distribution segment is engaged in processing crude oil and other hydrocarbons into petroleum products, as well as the purchase, sale and transportation of crude oil and petroleum products. Corporate assets are allocated between exploration and production and refining, marketing and distribution in proportion to sales of these segments. Drilling services, construction services, banking and finance services, and other activities are combined in the All other category. Substantially all of the Company's operations are conducted in the Russian Federation. Further, the geographical regions within the Russian Federation have substantially similar economic and regulatory conditions. Therefore, the Company has not presented any separate geographical disclosure.

 

The significant accounting policies applied to each operating segment are consistent with those applied to the consolidated financial statements. Sales of goods and services between the operating segments are carried out using prices agreed upon between Rosneft and its subsidiaries.

 

Operating segments in 2011:

Exploration and production

Refining, marketing and distribution

All other

Total elimination

Consolidated

Revenues from external customers

1,699

87,437

2,839

-

91,975

Intersegmental revenues

24,083

5,925

8,585

(38,593)

-

Total revenues

25,782

93,362

11,424

(38,593)

91,975

Production and operating expenses and cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

2,586

12,568

1,444

-

16,598

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

4,945

816

235

-

5,996

Operating income

11,218

35,484

7,771

(38,593)

15,880

Total other expense, net

(174)

Income before tax

15,706

Total assets

53,975

41,424

10,569

-

105,968

 

Operating segments in 2010:

Exploration and production

Refining, marketing and distribution

All other

Total elimination

Consolidated

Revenues from external customers

1,149

59,847

2,051

-

63,047

Intersegmental revenues

17,737

4,337

7,845

(29,919)

-

Total revenues

18,886

64,184

9,896

(29,919)

63,047

Production and operating expenses and cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

2,348

3,746

1,084

-

7,178

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

4,503

864

230

-

5,597

Operating income

10,111

28,167

5,140

(29,919)

13,499

Total other expense, net

(183)

Income before tax

13,316

Total assets

49,961

35,871

7,997

-

93,829

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

23. Segment Information (continued)

 

Operating segments in 2009:

Exploration andproduction

Refining, marketing and distribution

All other

Total elimination

Consolidated

Revenues from external customers

981

44,358

1,487

-

46,826

Intersegmental revenues

9,723

2,876

5,490

(18,089)

-

Total revenues

10,704

47,234

6,977

(18,089)

46,826

Production and operating expenses and cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

1,935

3,239

740

-

5,914

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

3,405

755

190

-

4,350

Operating income

5,172

17,437

4,608

(18,089)

9,128

Total other expense, net

(609)

Income before tax

8,519

Total assets

47,531

28,522

7,179

-

83,232

 

Below is a breakdown of revenues by domestic and export sales.

2011

2010

2009

Oil and gas sales

International sales of crude oil - Europe and other directions

32,496

22,895

18,275

International sales of crude oil - Asia

12,488

9,824

4,744

International sales of crude oil - CIS

1,847

1,363

1,313

Domestic sales of crude oil

100

269

134

Domestic sales of gas

486

416

354

Total oil and gas sales

47,417

34,767

24,820

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

International sales of petroleum products - Europe and other directions

17,009

8,401

6,827

International sales of petroleum products - Asia

7,616

5,985

4,895

International sales of petroleum products - CIS

277

172

144

Domestic sales of petroleum products

16,093

11,686

8,630

Domestic sales of petrochemicals

332

297

170

International sales of petrochemicals

1,693

119

70

Total petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

43,020

26,660

20,736

 

The Company had one major customer in 2011 and one such customer in 2010 and 2009 which accounted for 10% or more of total revenues in each respective year. These customers accounted for revenues of US$ 13,937 million, US$ 9,559 million, and US$ 5,332 million or 15%, 15% and 11% of total revenues, respectively. These revenues are recognized mainly under the refining, marketing and distribution segment. Management does not believe that the Company is dependent on any particular customer.

 

 

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

24. Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Risk Management

 

Assets and liabilities of the Company that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are presented in the table below in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.

Fair value measurement as of December 31, 2011

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Assets:

Current assets

Trading securities

277

326

-

603

Available-for-sale securities

259

359

-

618

Derivatives

-

3

-

3

Non-current assets

Available-for-sale securities

146

13

-

159

Total assets measured at fair value

682

701

-

1,383

Current liabilities:

Derivatives

-

(121)

-

(121)

Total liabilities measured at fair value

-

(121)

-

(121)

 

Fair value measurement as of December 31, 2010

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Assets:

Current assets

Trading securities

154

575

-

729

Available-for-sale securities

129

131

-

260

Derivatives

-

77

-

77

Net assets held for sale

55

-

-

55

Non-current assets

Available-for-sale securities

-

17

-

17

Total assets measured at fair value

338

800

-

1,138

Current liabilities:

Derivatives

-

(191)

-

(191)

Total liabilities measured at fair value

-

(191)

-

(191)

 

The market for a number of financial assets and liabilities is not active. In accordance with requirements of FASB ASC 820-10-35-47 observable inputs of Level 2 were used to determine fair value of such financial assets and liabilities.

 

Assets and liabilities of the Company that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are presented in the table below in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.

 

Fair value measurement as of December 31, 2011

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Assets:

Non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment

92

-

-

92

Equity method investments

71

-

-

71

Total assets measured at fair value

163

-

-

163

 

As of December 31, 2011 property, plant and equipment represent the fair value measurement of three twin-hull shuttle oil tankers (see Note 9). As of December 31, 2011, equity method investments represent the Company's investments in OJSC Kubanenergo and OJSC Tomsk Distribution Company measured at fair value (see Note 8).

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

24. Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Risk Management (continued)

 

The Company, in connection with its current activities, is exposed to various financial risks, such as foreign currency risks, commodity price risk, interest rate risks and credit risks. The Company manages these risks and monitors its exposure on a regular basis.

 

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, held-to-maturity securities, notes and accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other current assets approximates their carrying value recognized in these financial statements. The fair value of long-term debt differs from the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The estimated fair value of long-term debt discounted using the estimated market interest rate for similar financial liabilities amounted to US$ 18,727 million and US$ 18,555 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These amounts include all future cash outflows related to the repayment of long-term loans, including their current portion and interest expenses.

 

A substantial portion of the Company's sales revenues is received in US$. In addition, substantial financing and investing activities, obligations and commitments are also undertaken in US$. Significant operating and investing expenditures, other obligations and commitments as well as tax liabilities are denominated in RUB. As a result the Company's is exposed to the corresponding currency risk.

 

The Company enters into contracts to economically hedge certain of its risks associated with RUB appreciation and increase of interest expense accrued on the Company debt. Hedge accounting pursuant to FASB ASC 815 is not applied to these contracts.

 

In December 2007, the Company entered into a 5-year interest rate swap contract with a notional amount of US$ 3 billion. Under the terms of the contract, a floating LIBOR rate may be converted into a certain fixed rate. The other party has a call option to terminate the contract. The fair value of the interest swap was recorded in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 as other current liabilities in the amount of US$ 81.4 million and US$ 157.8 million, respectively. The change in fair value was recorded in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income for the 2011 as a reduction in interest expense in the amount of US$ 76.4 million.

 

In December 2008, the Company entered into a 5-year interest rate swap contract with a notional amount of US$ 500 million. Under the terms of the contract, a floating LIBOR rate may be converted into a certain fixed rate. The other party will have a call option to terminate the contract commencing two years after the contract date. The fair value of the interest swap was recorded in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 as other current liabilities in the amount of US$ 29.3 million and US$ 33.4 million, respectively. The change in fair value was recorded in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income for the 2011 as a reduction in interest expense in the amount of US$ 4.1 million.

 

The Company entered into fixed interest rate structured deposit agreements with two Russian banks (see Note 4). If on the deposit repayment date the spot RUB/US$ exchange rate is higher than agreed conversion rate, the other party has a call option to repay amount in RUB which shall be equal to the nominal deposit amount multiplied by the respective conversion rate. Embedded call options were bifurcated from the host contracts and recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2011 as Other current assets and Other current liabilities and as of December 31, 2010 as Other current assets (see Note 7). The resulting change in fair values was recorded in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income for the 2011 as a component of Foreign exchange gain/(loss).

 

  

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

24. Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Risk Management (continued)

 

Structured deposit agreements and related gains and losses are as follows:

Issue date

Expiry date

Nominal

amount

Fair value

Foreign exchange gain/loss

December 31,2011

December 31,

2010

2011

2010

May 2010

May 2011

995

-

11

(11)

11

June 2010

June 2011

200

-

5

(5)

5

July 2010

July 2011

750

-

15

(15)

15

September 2010

September 2011

250

-

6

(6)

6

October 2010

October 2011

443

-

10

(10)

10

November 2010

November 2011

957

-

27

(27)

27

December 2010

December 2011

100

-

3

(3)

3

February 2011

February 2012

500

(9)

-

(9)

-

March 2011

March 2012

50

(1)

-

(1)

-

August 2011

December 2011

100

-

-

-

-

November 2011

May 2012

200

1

-

1

-

November 2011

November 2012

200

3

-

3

-

4,745

(6)

77

(83)

77

 

Fair values of interest rate swap contracts and embedded call options are based on estimated amounts that the Company would pay or receive upon termination of the contracts as of December 31, 2011.

 

25. Subsequent Events

 

In February 2012, Rosneft and Sberbank signed a tentative agreement on the acquisition by Rosneft of a 35.3% stake in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha LLC. Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha LLC holds production licences for the Srednebotuobinsk oil and gas condensate field located 160 km north of the ESPO pipeline. The acquisition price was agreed at US$ 444 million.

 

  

 

  

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

Supplementary Oil and Gas Disclosure (unaudited)

 

In accordance with FASB ASC 932, Extractive Activities-Oil and Gas, subtopic 235, Notes to Financial Statements, the Company makes certain supplemental disclosures about its oil and gas exploration and production operations. While this information was developed with reasonable care and disclosed in good faith, it is emphasized that the data represents management's best estimates. Accordingly, this information may not necessarily represent the current financial condition of the Company and its expected future financial results.

 

In accordance with FASB ASC 932-235-50-1C the Company does not provide complete disaggregated disclosures about its equity investees, because the results are immaterial in comparing with results of consolidated companies.

 

Capitalized Costs Relating to Oil and Gas Producing Activities

Consolidated entities:

As of December 31,

2011

2010

Оil and gas properties:

Proved

71,115

62,960

Unproved

4,192

4,104

Total capitalized costs

75,307

67,064

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and valuation allowances

(22,952)

(18,370)

Net capitalized costs

52,355

48,694

 

The share of the Company in the capitalized costs of equity investees on December 31, 2011 and 2010 was US$ 2,643 million and US$ 2,631 million, respectively.

 

Net book value of mineral rights on December 31, 2011 and 2010 was US$ 15.7 billion and US$ 16.2 billion, respectively.

 

Cost Incurred in Oil and Gas Property Acquisition, Exploration and Development Activities

Consolidated entities:

2011

2010

2009

Acquisition of properties:

Proved

-

-

-

Unproved

254

140

96

Exploration costs

448

439

325

Development costs

7,989

6,618

5,422

 

The share of the Company in acquisition, exploration and development expenditures of its equity investees was US$ 522 million, US$ 324 million and US$ 493 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

Supplementary Oil and Gas Disclosure (unaudited) (continued)

 

Results of Operations for Oil & Gas Producing Activities

Consolidated entities:

2011

2010

2009

Revenues:

Sales

26,237

18,284

13,463

Transfers

12,863

12,902

10,056

Total

39,100

31,186

23,519

Production costs (excluding production taxes)

2,445

2,319

1,869

Selling, general and administrative expenses

838

740

630

Exploration expenses

448

439

325

Accretion expenses

146

107

87

Depreciation, depletion, and amortization, and valuation provisions

4,943

4,503

3,318

Taxes other than income tax

14,564

10,034

6,867

Income tax expenses

2,110

1,845

1,029

Results of operation for producing activities

13,606

11,199

9,394

 

Revenues are based on the market prices determined at the point of delivery from production units.

 

The Company's share in the operating results generated from oil and gas production of equity investees in 2011, 2010 and 2009 was US$ 594 million, US$ 234 million and US$ 229 million, respectively.

 

Reserve Quantity Information

The recording and reporting of proved reserves is governed by criteria established by regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company's reserves as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were appraised by outside unrelated third-party petroleum engineers.

 

The Company's proved oil and gas reserves are located entirely in the Russian Federation.

 

Proved reserves are those quantities of oil and gas which, by analysis of geosciences and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward from known reservoirs, and under the existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulation. In certain cases, recovery of such reserves may require considerable investments in wells and related equipment. Proved reserves also include additional oil and gas reserves that will be extracted after the expiry date of licence agreements if the renewal of such agreements is reasonably certain. Proved developed reserves are the quantities of oil and gas expected to be recovered from existing wells using existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared with the cost of new well.

 

Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are proved reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage are limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled unless evidence using reliable technology exits that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances. Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances justify a longer time.

 

Under no circumstances are estimates of proved undeveloped reserves attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless those techniques have been proved effective by actual project in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty. Due to inherent industry uncertainties and the limited nature of deposit data, estimates of reserves are subject to change as additional information becomes available.

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

Supplementary Oil and Gas Disclosure (unaudited) (continued)

 

Reserve Quantity Information (continued)

 

The Company included in proved reserves those reserves which the Company intends to extract after the expiry of the current licences. The licences for the development and production of hydrocarbons currently held by the Company generally expire between 2013 and 2051, and the licences for the most important reserves expire between 2013 and 2051. In accordance with the effective version of the law of the Russian Federation, On Subsurface Resources (the "Law"), licences are currently granted for a production period determined on the basis of technological and economic criteria applied to the development of a mineral deposit which guarantee rational use of subsurface resources and necessary environmental protection. In accordance with the Law and upon gradual expiration of old licences issued under the previous version of the Law, the Company extends its hydrocarbon production licences for the whole productive life of the fields. Extension of the licences depends on both current and future compliance with the terms set forth in the licence agreements. As of the date of these financial statements, the Company's operations are generally in compliance with all the terms of the licence agreements and are intended to maintain compliance therewith in the future (see Note 9).

 

The Company's estimates of net proved oil and gas reserves and changes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are shown in the table below and expressed in million barrels of oil equivalent (oil production data was recalculated from tons to barrels using a field specific ratio in the range from 7.05 to 7.65 barrels per tonne, gas production data was recalculated from cubic meters to barrels of oil equivalent ("boe") using a ratio of 35.3/6 cubic meters per barrel):

 

Consolidated entities:

2011

2010

2009

Proved developed

and undeveloped reserves:

Total proved oil and gas reserves,

mln boe

Including natural gas reserves,

mln boe

Total proved oil and gas reserves,

mln boe

Including natural gas reserves,

mln boe

Total proved oil and gas reserves,

mln boe

Including natural gas reserves,

mln boe

Beginning of year

13,970

1,357

13,951

1,107

13,360

1,070

Revisions of previous estimates

2,201

1,699

319

292

683

56

Extensions and discoveries

1,044

249

541

24

703

51

Improved recovery

-

-

-

-

-

-

Purchases of minerals in place

-

-

-

-

-

-

Production

(863)

(69)

(841)

(66)

(795)

(70)

End of year

16,352

3,236

13,970

1,357

13,951

1,107

Of which:

Proved reserves under PSA Sakhalin

95

26

80

27

66

28

 

Proved developed reserves

Beginning of year

9,769

984

10,204

904

10,032

882

End of year

10,514

1,273

9,769

984

10,204

904

Proved undeveloped reserves

Beginning of year

4,201

373

3,747

203

3,328

188

End of year

5,838

1,963

4,201

373

3,747

203

Noncontrolling interests in total proved reserves

109

36

122

15

103

9

Noncontrolling interests in proved developed reserves

71

25

44

5

37

7

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

Supplementary Oil and Gas Disclosure (unaudited) (continued)

 

Reserve Quantity Information (continued)

 

Entity's share of proved developed and undeveloped reserves of investees accounted for by the equity method:

2011

2010

2009

Total proved oil and gas reserves, mln boe

Including natural gas reserves, mln boe

Total proved oil and gas reserves, mln boe

Including natural gas reserves, mln boe

Total proved oil and gas reserves, mln boe

Including natural gas reserves, mln boe

Beginning of year

1,228

94

1,195

108

1,086

102

Revisions of previous estimates

64

4

66

(11)

56

7

Extensions and discoveries

52

2

39

1

121

4

Improved recovery

-

-

-

-

2

-

Purchases of minerals in place

-

-

-

-

-

-

Production

(79)

(5)

(72)

(4)

(70)

(5)

End of year

1,265

95

1,228

94

1,195

108

Proved developed reserves

Beginning of year

760

87

769

101

763

97

End of year

777

90

760

87

769

101

Proved undeveloped reserves

Beginning of year

468

7

426

7

323

5

End of year

488

5

468

7

426

7

 

 

The Company's share in the proved developed reserves of equity investees in 2011, 2010 and 2009 was 777 million barrels of oil equivalent, 760 million barrels of oil equivalent and 769 million barrels of oil equivalent, respectively.

 

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows and Changes therein Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

 

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows related to the above oil and gas reserves is calculated in accordance with the requirements of FASB ASC 932-235. Estimated future cash inflows from oil and gas production are computed by applying average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within 12-month period before the balance sheet date for oil and gas to year-end quantities of estimated net proved reserves. Adjustment in this calculation for future price changes is limited to those required by contractual arrangements in existence at the end of each reporting period. Future development and production costs are those estimated future expenditures necessary to develop and produce estimated proved reserves as of year-end based on year-end cost indices and assuming continuation of year end economic conditions. Estimated future income taxes are calculated by applying appropriate year-end statutory tax rates. These rates reflect allowable deductions and tax credits and are applied to estimated future net pre-tax cash flows, net of the tax bases of related assets.

 

Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using a 10% discount factor. Discounting requires a year-by-year estimates of future expenditures to be incurred in the periods when the reserves will be extracted.

 

 

 

 

   

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

Supplementary Oil and Gas Disclosure (unaudited) (continued)

 

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows and Changes therein Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (continued)

 

The information provided in the tables below does not represent management's estimates of the Company's expected future cash flows or of the value of its proved oil and gas reserves. Estimates of proved reserves change over time as new information becomes available. Moreover, probable and possible reserves which may become proved in the future are excluded from the calculations. The arbitrary valuation prescribed under FASB ASC 932-235 requires assumptions as to the timing and the amount of future development and production costs. The calculations should not be relied upon as an indication of the Company's future cash flows or of the value of its oil and gas reserves.

 

Consolidated entities:

2011

2010

2009

Future cash inflows

635,351

449,384

383,839

Future development costs

(32,317)

(34,276)

(29,301)

Future production costs

(333,496)

(215,802)

(177,879)

Future income tax expenses

(43,711)

(31,040)

(27,550)

Future net cash flows

225,827

168,266

149,109

10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows

(133,099)

(93,520)

(79,563)

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

92,728

74,746

69,546

Entity's share of equity method investees:

Future cash inflows

59,201

43,594

35,202

Future development costs

(4,424)

(4,132)

(3,851)

Future production costs

(30,273)

(20,835)

(13,831)

Future income tax expenses

(4,668)

(3,648)

(3,426)

Future net cash flows

19,836

14,979

14,094

10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows

(10,572)

(8,542)

(7,754)

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

9,264

6,437

6,340

Total consolidated and equity interests in the standardized measure of discounted future cash flows

101,992

81,183

75,886

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 

Supplementary Oil and Gas Disclosure (unaudited) (continued)

 

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows and Changes therein Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (continued)

 

Consolidated entities:

2011

2010

2009

Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced during the period

(21,253)

(18,093)

(14,153)

Net changes in sales and transfer prices and in production (lifting) costs related to future production

11,625

12,145

35,895

Changes in estimated future development costs

2,495

(8,895)

(8,155)

Previously estimated development costs incurred during the period

7,989

6,618

5,426

Net changes due to revisions in quantity estimates

7,622

1,720

2,510

Net change due to extensions, discoveries, and improved recovery

7,539

3,479

8,800

Net change in income taxes

(4,859)

(1,667)

(6,059)

Accretion of discount

7,475

6,955

3,550

Net change due to purchases and sales of minerals in place

-

-

-

Other

(651)

2,938

6,231

Aggregated change in the standardized measure of discounted future netcash flows for the year

17,982

5,200

34,045

 

The discounted value of future cash flows as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 includes the interest of other noncontrolling shareholders in the amount of US$ 1,083 million, US$ 685 million and US$ 892 million, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED DECEMBER 31 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009

 

 

  

 

 

The following discussion of Rosneft's financial condition and results of operations is based on, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company's financial statements and the notes thereto for the periods endedDecember 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (the "Consolidated Financial Statements"). Such terms as "Rosneft," "Company" and "Group" in their different forms in this report mean Rosneft Oil Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliated companies. This report presents Rosneft's financial condition and results of operations on a consolidated basis. This report contains forward‑looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Rosneft's actual results may materially differ from those discussed in such forward‑looking statements as a result of various factors.

 

Except as otherwise indicated, oil and gas reserves and production are presented pro-rata for companies accounted for on an equity basis or under the proportionate consolidation method and 100% for fully consolidated companies.

 

Except as otherwise indicated, all amounts are provided in millions of US$. All figures are rounded; however, the fluctuations in percentage are provided based on the actual data.

 

To convert tonnes to barrels a 7.315 ratio is used. To convert thousands of cubic meters of gas to barrels of oil equivalent a 5.883 ratio is used.

 

 

 

 

Overview

 

Rosneft is a vertically integrated oil and gas company with core activities and assets located principally in Russia. The Company is primarily engaged in exploration and production of hydrocarbons, oil refining and product marketing.

 

OJSC Rosneft was established in accordance with the Russian Government Decree №971, issued on September 29, 1995. From its foundation, the Company has expanded significantly through organic growth, consolidation of interests, acquisition of new companies and development of new businesses. Rosneft is now the leader of Russia's petroleum industry in terms of crude oil reserves and production operating in all key regions of the country.

 

Rosneft is one of the world's largest publicly traded companies in terms of proved hydrocarbon reserves which as of December 31, 2011 amounted to 23.35 billion barrels of oil equivalent, including 18.35 billion barrels of oil and 850 billion cubic meters of gas, on the basis of the standards set forth by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Petroleum Reserves Management System ("PRMS").

Rosneft's crude oil production amounts to 2.40 million barrels per day (average for the fourth quarter of 2011) and output of natural and associated gas is over 3.53 billion cubic meters per quarter (data for the fourth quarter of 2011).

 

Rosneft processes part of the crude oil produced at its seven refineries with total primary refining capacity of 1.0 million barrels per day. Rosneft's refinery throughput is 1.0 million barrels per day (average for the fourth quarter of 2011) which equals 48% of the Company's crude oil output. The remaining volumes of crude oil are mostly exported to Europe, Asia and CIS countries. Current utilization of the refining capacities is close to 100%. The remaining volumes of crude oil are mostly exported to Europe, Asia and CIS countries.

 

In May, 2011 Rosneft acquired a 50% stake in joint venture Ruhr Oel GmbH which owns stakes in four German refineries: Gelsenkirchen, MiRO, Bayernoil and PCK Schwedt. Net refining capacity of Ruhr Oel GmbH is 465,000 barrels per day. The Gelsenkirchen refinery has a petrochemical block with capacity of 3.9 million tonnes.

 

Part of the petroleum products produced by the Company at the domestic refineries is sold in Russia, both wholesale and through Rosneft's own retail network which comprises approximately 1,700 service stations in 41 regions of Russia (1,800 service stations including franchising agreements). The remaining volumes (mainly fuel oil, diesel and naphtha) are exported to Europe, CIS and Asia. Products produced at the German refineries are sold in Europe.

 

Financial and Operating Highlights

For 3 months

ended

%

change

For 12 months ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2010

2009

Financial results

Revenues (US$ million)

23,951

24,627

(2.7)%

91,975

63,047

46,826

EBITDA (US$ million)

4,753

5,283

(10.0)%

22,022

19,203

13,565

Net income (US$ million)

2,992

2,778

7.7%

12,452

10,400

6,514

Capital expenditures

4,265

2,768

54.1%

13,246

8,931

7,252

Adjusted free cash flow 1

(756)

69

(1,195.7)%

2,338

5,839

3,443

Net Debt

15,864

13,991

13.4%

15,864

13,662

18,489

Operational results

Crude oil production (th. barrels per day)

2,396

2,399

(0.1)%

2,380

2,322

2,182

Gas production (bcm)

3.53

3.00

17.7%

12.79

12.34

12.68

Hydrocarbon production (th. boe per day)

2,622

2,591

1.2%

2,586

2,521

2,386

Domestic production of petroleum products (million tonnes)

12.47

12.16

2.5%

48.08

47.89

47.06

 

Main Factors Affecting Results of Operations

 

Main factors affecting Rosneft's results of operations are:

·; Changes in crude oil, petroleum product and gas prices;

·; RUB/US$ exchange rate and inflation;

·; Taxation (including changes in mineral extraction tax and export customs duty);

·; Changes in transport tariffs of natural monopolies (for pipeline and railway transport);

·; Changes in the production volumes of crude oil, gas and petroleum products.

 

Changes in prices, export customs duty and transport tariffs can have a significant impact on the mix of products and distribution channels the Company selects seeking to maximise netback prices of the produced crude oil.

 

Changes in Crude Oil, Petroleum Product and Gas Prices

 

World crude oil prices are highly volatile and fluctuate depending on the global balance of supply and demand and on numerous speculative factors. Crude oil exported by Rosneft via Transneft's (Russian pipeline monopoly) pipeline system is blended with crude oil of other producers that is of a different quality. The resulting Urals blend is traded at a discount to Brent. Crude oil exported via ESPO pipeline is sold at a special price which is linked to the price for Dubai grade.

 

Russian domestic market prices of crude oil are difficult to determine, mainly due to the significant intragroup turnover between upstream and downstream segments of the vertically integrated oil companies that together represent approximately 90% of Russia's daily production and 85% of refinery throughput. Moreover, to the extent they exist, crude oil market prices in Russia can significantly deviate from export netbacks due to seasonal oversupply and regional imbalances.

 

Petroleum product prices in international and Russian markets are primarily determined by the level of world prices for crude oil, supply and demand for petroleum products and competition on different markets. Price dynamics are different for different types of petroleum products.

 

1 Free cash flow is adjusted for trading securities operations.flow is adjusted for trading securities operations. 

  

The table below sets forth the average crude oil and petroleum product prices worldwide and in Russia:

For 3 months

ended

 change between

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

 change

for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011-

2010

2010-

2009

World market

(US$ per barrel)

%

(US$ per barrel)

%

Brent (dated)

109.31

113.46

(3.7)%

111.27

79.47

61.51

40.0%

29.2%

Urals (average CIF Med and NWE)

108.63

111.50

(2.6)%

109.07

78.25

61.01

39.4%

28.3%

Urals (FOB Primorsk)

107.74

111.55

(3.4)%

108.20

76.74

59.51

41.0%

29.0%

Urals (FOB Novorossysk)

107.52

111.57

(3.6)%

108.32

76.76

59.60

41.1%

28.8%

Dubai-Oman

106.80

107.29

(0.5)%

106.41

78.16

61.80

36.1%

26.5%

(US$ per tonne)

(US$ per tonne)

Naphtha (av. FOB/CIF Med)

858.14

939.38

(8.6)%

914.75

698.44

520.59

31.0%

34.2%

Naphtha (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

872.55

951.32

(8.3)%

929.15

710.85

531.19

30.7%

33.8%

Naphtha (CFR Japan)

888.24

956.06

(7.1)%

938.24

723.86

553.36

29.6%

30.8%

Fuel oil 3.5% (av. FOB/CIF Med)

623.95

631.22

(1.2)%

608.95

442.26

348.63

37.7%

26.9%

Fuel oil 3.5% (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

622.05

628.81

(1.1)%

607.17

440.79

344.00

37.7%

28.1%

High sulphur fuel oil 180 cst(FOB Singapore)

673.58

660.00

2.1%

648.71

470.35

370.76

37.9%

26.9%

Gasoil 0.1% (av. FOB/CIF Med)

941.16

945.41

(0.4)%

931.63

672.29

520.65

38.6%

29.1%

Gasoil 0.1% (av. FOB

Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

946.49

943.95

0.3%

933.76

671.84

518.92

39.0%

29.5%

Gasoil 0.5% (FOB Singapore)

923.28

926.67

(0.4)%

924.77

664.70

512.55

39.1%

29.7%

 

Russian market(net of VAT, including excise tax)

(US$ per tonne)

(US$ per tonne)

 

Crude oil

299.86

291.51

2.9%

304.40

222.22

182.49

37.0%

21.8%

 

Fuel oil

294.32

330.98

(11.1)%

299.49

252.06

207.89

18.8%

21.2%

 

Summer diesel

694.03

678.38

2.3%

670.00

469.45

397.96

42.7%

18.0%

 

Winter diesel

811.14

697.87

16.2%

741.61

544.09

452.19

36.3%

20.3%

 

Jet fuel

777.08

694.32

11.9%

701.77

490.35

427.04

43.1%

14.8%

 

High octane gasoline

790.93

873.01

(9.4)%

821.47

685.07

579.79

19.9%

18.2%

 

Low octane gasoline

736.48

773.29

(4.8)%

753.03

569.00

500.01 

32.3%

13.8%

 

Sources: Platts (world market), Kortes/Argus (Russian market).

 

The Russian Government regulates the prices of the gas Gazprom sells in Russia. While the regulated price has been rising in Russia and is expected to continue to rise to a level closer to parity with export netbacks, it is currently still significantly below this level.

 

The regulated price has affected, and is likely to continue to affect, the pricing of the gas Rosneft sells to Gazprom. Rosneft's average gas sale price was RUB 1,549 (excluding VAT) (US$ 49.59 per thousand cubic meters) and RUB 1,509 (US$ 51.93 per thousand cubic meters) in the fourth and third quarters of 2011, respectively.

 

In 2011, and 2010, Rosneft's average gas sale price was RUB 1,470 (US$ 50.00 per thousand cubic meters) and RUB 1,289 (US$ 42.45 per thousand cubic meters), respectively. In 2009 Rosneft's average gas sale price was RUB 1,058 (excluding VAT) (US$ 33.36 per thousand cubic meters).

 

 

  

 

US$/RUB Exchange Rate and Inflation

 

The US$/RUB exchange rate and inflation in the Russian Federation affect Rosneft's results as most of the Company's revenues from sales of crude oil and petroleum products are denominated in US$, while most of the Company's expenses are denominated in RUB. Thus, the depreciation of the rouble positively affects Rosneft's results, while rouble appreciation has a negative effect.

 

The table below provides information on exchange rate movements and inflation during the periods analyzed:

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2010

2009

Rouble inflation (CPI) for the period

1.4%

(0.3)%

6.1%

8.8%

8.8%

Change of the average invert exchange rate (RUB/US$) compared to the previous period

(7.0)%

(3.7)%

3.3%

4.4%

(21.6)%

US$/RUB exchange rate at the end of the period

32.20

31.88

32.20

30.48

30.24

Average US$/RUB exchange rate for the period

31.23

29.05

29.39

30.37

31.72

Real appreciation/(depreciation) of the RUB against the US$ compared to the previous period

(6.3)%

(3.5)%

12.1%

11.6%

(22.8)%

 

Taxation

 

The table below provides information on the average enacted tax rates specific to the Russian oil industry:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for

12 months ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -2010

 2010-2009

Mineral extraction tax

Crude oil (RUB per tonne)

4,718

4,547

3.8%

4,455

3,074

2,299

44.9%

33.7%

Natural gas (RUB per th. cubic meters)

237

237

-

237

147

147

61.2%

-

Associated gas (RUB per th. cubic meters)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Export customs duty

Crude oil (US$ per tonne)

403.7

442.5

(8.8)%

408.92

273.61

179.33

49.5%

52.6%

East Siberian Crude oil* (US$ per tonne)

403.7

442.5

(8.8)%

337.56

58.07

-

481.3%

-

Gasoline, naphta** (US$ per tonne)

363.3

398.2

(8.8)%

341.29

196.64

133.13

73.6%

47.7%

Light and middle distillates (US$ per tonne)

266.4

296.4

(10.1)%

274.08

196.64

133.13

39.4%

47.7%

Liquid fuels (fuel oil) (US$ per tonne)

266.4

206.6

28.9%

208.21

105.93

71.71

96.6%

47.7%

* For Verkhnechonsk and Vankor fields.

**Starting from May 1, 2011 the Russian Government introduced a special export duty on gasoline equivalent to 90% of the export duty for crude oil. Starting from June 1, 2011 the Russian Government introduced a special export duty on naphtha.

 

In 2010 the excise tax rates on the petroleum products were as follows:

Excise on petroleum products

High octane gasoline (RUB per tonne)

3,992

Low octane gasoline (RUB per tonne)

2,923

Naphtha (RUB per tonne)

4,290

Diesel (RUB per tonne)

1,188

Lubricants (RUB per tonne)

3,246

 

 

 

   

According to the legislation introduced in the end of 2010 the excise taxes on the petroleum products were increased and linked to the environmental characteristics of the products.

For 12 months

ended December 31

For 6 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

Excise on petroleum products

2011

June 30, 2012

December 31, 2012

2013

2014

High octane gasoline (RUB per tonne)

High octane gasoline below euro-3,4,5 (RUB per tonne)

5,995

7,725

8,225

10,100

11,110

High octane gasoline euro-3 (RUB per tonne)

5,672

7,382

7,882

9,750

10,725

High octane gasoline euro-4 (RUB per tonne)

5,143

6,822

6,822

8,560

9,416

High octane gasoline euro-5 (RUB per tonne)

5,143

6,822

5,143

5,143

5,657

Naphtha (RUB per tonne)

6,089

7,824

7,824

9,617

10,579

Diesel (RUB per tonne)

Diesel below euro- 3,4,5 (RUB per tonne)

2,753

4,098

4,300

5,860

6,446

Diesel euro-3 (RUB per tonne)

2,485

3,814

4,300

5,860

6,446

Diesel euro-4 (RUB per tonne)

2,247

3,562

3,562

4,934

5,427

Diesel euro-5 (RUB per tonne)

2,247

3,562

2,962

4,334

4,767

Lubricants (RUB per tonne)

4,681

6,072

6,072

7,509

8,260

 

Tax rates translated from RUB to US$ at the average exchange rate for the period:

For 3 months

ended

% change between

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for

12 months ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011-

2010

 2010-

2009

Mineral extraction tax

Crude oil (US$ per tonne)

151.07

156.56

(3.5)%

151.58

101.23

72.47

49.7%

39.7%

Natural gas (US$ per th. cubic meters)

7.59

8.16

(7.0)%

8.06

4.84

4.64

66.5%

4.3%

 

Tax rates translated from tonnes to barrels:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for

12 months ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -2010

 2010-2009

Mineral extraction tax on crude oil

(US$ per barrel)

20.65

 

21.40

(3.5)%

20.73

13.84

9.91

49.8%

39.7%

Export duty on crude oil

(US$ per barrel)

55.18

 

60.49

(8.8)%

55.90

37.40

24.51

49.5%

52.6%

 

Rosneft pays a significant portion of its revenues in taxes, as set out in the following table:

For 3 months ended

For 12 months ended December 31

December 30, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2010

2009

US$ million

US$ million

US$ million

US$ million

US$ million

Total revenues

23,951

24,627

91,975

63,047

46,826

Total taxes*

12,075

12,738

46,910

30,307

22,192

Effective tax burden, %

50.4%

51.7%

51.0%

48.1%

47.4%

* Includes the following taxes: export customs duty, mineral extraction tax, excise tax, income tax and other taxes.

 

The mineral extraction tax and the export customs duty accounted for approximately 45.9% and 46.1% of Rosneft's total revenues in the fourth and third quarters of 2011, respectively. In 2011, 2010 and 2009 the mineral extraction tax and the export customs duty accounted for approximately 44.5%, 40.9% and 39.8% of Rosneft's total revenues.

 

 

 

 

Mineral Extraction Tax

 

The rate of mineral extraction tax for crude oil is linked to the Urals price in the international market and changes every month. It is calculated in US$ per tonne of crude oil produced and enacted in RUB per tonne using average exchange rate for the respective month.

 

The mineral extraction tax rate is calculated by multiplying the base rate of RUB 419 by the adjustment ratio of ((Price ‑ 15) / 261) * Exchange rate, where "Price" is the average Urals price per barrel and "Exchange rate" is the average RUB/US$ exchange rate established by the Central Bank of Russia in the respective month.

According to changes in tax legislation introduced in the end of 2010 the base rate will be increased to RUB 446 from January 1, 2012 and to RUB 470 from January 1, 2013.

 

The Russian Tax Code provides for reduced or zero mineral extraction tax rate for crude oil produced at certain fields:

- the reduced rate is applicable to crude oil produced at the fields with reserve depletion rate of over 80%; for calculation of the reduced rate a special adjustment ratio (3.8 - 3.5 * reserve depletion rate) is applied; the reduced rate varies therefore from 0.3 to 1.0 of the standard rate;

- the zero tax rate is applicable to high-viscosity crude oil;

- the zero tax rate is applicable during specific time period or for specific volumes of production (depending on what is achieved earlier) at fields in Yakutia, Irkutsk Region, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Nenets Autonomous District, Yamal Peninsula, Azov and Caspian seas, offshore fields located to the north of the Arctic Circle (the exact time period and volume vary by regions where the field is located).

 

Rosneft benefits from the reduced mineral extraction tax rate as it has several fields with reserve depletion rate of over 80%. Moreover its fields in Irkutsk Region and Krasnoyarsk Territory are subject to the zero mineral extraction tax rate which is applicable for the first 25 million tonnes of production or the first 10 years for a production licence and 15 years for an exploration and production license.

 

The Verkhnechonsk field in the Irkutsk Region developed jointly with TNK-BP and accounted for on an equity basis was put on stream in 2008 and the major Vankor field in the Krasnoyarsk Territory developed by Rosneft was officially launched in August 2009.

 

On August 6,2011 accumulated production at the Vankor oil field reached 25 million tons. Since then zero MET rate was replaced by the standard one.

Rosneft has exploration projects in the Azov and Caspian seas and participates in the Sakhalin-1 PSA which is subject to a special tax regime exempting the Company from paying mineral extraction tax.

 

Export Customs Duty on Crude Oil

The rate of export customs duty on crude oil is linked to the Urals price in the international market and is denominated in US$ per tonne.

 

The table below sets forth the calculation of the ordinary export customs duty for crude oil:

Urals price (US$ per tonne)

Export customs duty(US$ per tonne)

Below and including 109.5 (15 US$ per barrel)

Export customs duty is not levied

Above 109.5 to and including 146

(15 to 20 US$ per barrel)

35% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonne and US$ 109.5

Above 146 to and including 182.5

(20 to 25 US$ per barrel)

US$ 12.78 plus 45% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonne

and US$ 146

Above 182.5 (25 US$ per barrel)

US$ 29.2 plus 65% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonne

and US$ 182.5

 

The export customs duty is changed every month and the duty for the next month is based on the average Urals price for the period from the 15th day of the previous month to the 14th day (inclusive) of the current month.

 

Starting from October 2011, the maximum ordinary export customs duty for crude oil was calculated using the following formula: US$ 29.2 plus 60% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonne and US$ 182.5

Export customs duty on Eastern Siberian crude oil (Vankor and Verkhnechonsk)

Since the end of 2009, crude oil produced at a number of fields in Eastern Siberia has been subject to a specific export customs duty regime. In particular, zero export duty rate was applicable to the Verkhnechonsk field starting from December 1, 2009 and to the Vankor field starting from January 19, 2010.

 

Starting from July 01, 2010 the zero rate was replaced by a special rate calculated as (Price-50) * 0.45, where "Price" is average Urals price in US$ per barrel used for the calculation of ordinary export duty.

Starting from May 1, 2011 the Vankor and Verkhnechonsk fields were excluded from the list of fields subject to the special export duty rate.

 

Export customs duty on crude oil export to CIS

In 2010 export duties were not payable on crude oil exports to CIS countries that are members of the Customs Union except for Belarus. In January 2010, the exports of crude oil to Belarus were taxable at the ordinary export duty rate. Оn January 27, 2010 the Government of Russian Federation and the Government of Belarus signed an agreement on crude oil and petroleum product exports. In accordance with the agreement crude oil exports to Belarus within specific limits established by the Russian Ministry of Energy are exempted from export duty.

 

Export Customs Duty on Petroleum Products

Export customs duty on petroleum products is set every month by the Government simultaneously with the export customs duty on crude oil and is denominated in US$ per tonne. The rate of the export customs duty on petroleum products is linked to the Urals price on the international market. Average Urals price used for petroleum product export customs duty calculation is the same as for the calculation of the crude oil export customs duty. The rate of the export customs duty depended on the type of the product: light (gasoline, diesel, jet) or dark (fuel oil) till February 2011.

 

Starting from February 2011 the export duty for light petroleum products was set at 67% of the export duty for crude oil, the export duty for dark petroleum products was set at 46.7% of the export duty for crude oil.

 

Starting from May 1, 2011 the Russian Government introduced a special export duty for gasoline equivalent to 90% of the export duty for crude oil. Starting from June 1, 2011 the Russian Government introduced a special export duty for naphtha equivalent to 90% of the export duty for crude oil.

Starting from October 2011 the export duty for light petroleum products was lowered from 67% to 66% of export duty for crude oil, the export duty for dark petroleum products was raised from 46.7% to 66% of export duty for crude oil. Export duty for naphta and gasoline remained at 90% of crude oil export duty.

Starting January 2011, petroleum products export sales to the members of the Customs Union (including Belarus) are exempted from customs duties within certain volumes agreed by the members.

 

Changes in Transport Tariffs of Pipeline and Railway Monopolies

Rosneft transports most of its crude oil and petroleum products via pipeline network owned and operated by Transneft. These companies are natural state‑owned pipeline monopolies. Rosneft also transports crude oil and petroleum products via railway network owned and operated by RZD, another natural state-owned monopoly.

 

The Federal Tariff Service (the FTS), a governmental body regulating natural monopolies, sets Transneft's base tariff for transportation of crude oil and petroleum products respectively, which includes a dispatch tariff, a pumping tariff, loading, charge-discharge, transshipment and other tariffs. Tariffs' indexation for railroad transportation is also set by FTS. The tariffs are set in rubles and are not linked to the RUB/US$ exchange rate.

 

The FTS sets tariffs for each separate route of the pipeline networks depending on the length of the relevant routes, transportation direction and other factors, alternatively tariffs may be set for the entire route of the pipeline network. Tariffs for railroad transportation, where these costs are not already incorporated in pipeline tariffs, often depend on type and transportation route.

 

Recent changes of Transneft transportation tariffs

 

In 2010 Transneft increased its tariffs for crude oil export three times, in January, August and December, by 15.9%, 3.3% and 9.9%, respectively. In February 2010 tariffs for pipeline exports of petroleum products were increased by 10.4% and tariffs for transportation within Russia were raised by 2.2%.

 

In January 2011 Transneft increased tariffs for export transportation of petroleum products by 9.5% and for domestic transportation of petroleum products by 5.9%, respectively. On year-on-year average basis, tariffs for pipeline transportation of petroleum products increased by 10.4% for export sales and by 6.1% for domestic sales.

 

In September 2011 Transneft increased tariffs for crude oil transportation by 2.85%. On year-on-year average basis, tariffs for pipeline transportation of crude oil for export and domestic supplies increased by 13.1%. Transneft increased crude oil transportation tariffs by 5% on average in November, 2011. In 2011 Transneft increased its tariffs for the major crude oil export route "Yugansk - Primorsk" twice, in September and November, by 7.2% and 11.8%, respectively.

 

Recent changes of rail road transportation tariffs

 

Starting January 1, 2010 tariffs for rail road transportation were increased by 9.4%.

 

Starting January 1, 2011 tariffs for rail road transportation were raised by 8.0%. No further indexation took place in 2011.

 

 

  

Rosneft average transportation tariffs applied for major transportation routes denominated in RUB for the respective periods:

For 3 months

ended

 change

between

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

 change for

12 months ended

December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011-

2010

 2010-

2009

(RUB/tonne)

(%)

(RUB/tonne)

(%)

CRUDE OIL

Domestic

Pipeline

Yugansk - Samara refineries

745.22

723.74

3,0%

726.32

648.55

531.57

12.0%

22.0%

Samara - Samara refineries

46.18

45.71

1,0%

45.72

41.29

34.95

10.7%

18.1%

Yugansk - Angarsk refinery

1,234.80

1,201.53

2,8%

1,205.91

1,084.52

897.87

11.2%

20.8%

Purpe - Tuapse refinery

1543.44

1,493.00

3,4%

1,500.53

1,340.59

1,110.14

11.9%

20.8%

Tomsk - Achinsk refinery

336.43

329.45

2,1%

329.88

297.42

245.66

10.9%

21.1%

Pipeline and railroad

Yugansk - Komsomolsk refinery

3,945.49

3,924.31

0.5%

3,926.04

3,606.61

3,036.42

8.9%

18.8%

Exports

Pipeline

Yugansk - Primorsk

1,491.54

1,320.23

13.0%

1,348.21

1,163.86

968.19

15.8%

20.2%

Yugansk - Novorossysk

1,483.53

1,453.31

2.1%

1,456.55

1,307.20

1,099.32

11.4%

18.9%

Vankor (Purpe)-Tuapse

1,556.88

1,505.48

3.4%

1,513.43

1,354.85

-

11.7%

-

Vankor (Purpe)-Kozmino

1,881.93

1,833.13

2.7%

1,836.39

1,634.15

-

12.4%

-

Railroad and mixed

Purneftegaz - CPC*

-

-

-

2,044.25

1,883.92

1,667.36

8.5%

13.0%

Stavropolneftegaz - CPC (railroad)

659.73

659.73

-

659.73

610.93

543.37

32.0%

12.4%

PETROLEUM PRODUCT EXPORTS

Diesel

Samara refineries - Ventspils

1,776.93

1,747.35

1.7%

1,729.10

1,596.28

1,473.09

8.3%

8.4%

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

3,890.15

3,890.15

-

3,890.15

3,615.65

3,206.08

7.6%

12.8%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

1,525.31

1,525.31

-

1,525.31

1,419.03

1,256.94

7.5%

12.9%

Achinsk refinery - Tuapse

4,379.27

4,379.27

-

4,379.27

4,069.43

3,608.78

7.6%

12.8%

Fuel oil

Samara refineries - Odessa

2,763.31

2,537.78

8.9%

2,712.92

2,579.51

2,338.62

5.2%

10.3%

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

3,963.98

3,963.98

-

3,963.98

3,670.78

3,257.66

8.0%

12.7%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

1,484.69

1,484.69

-

1,484.69

1,374.87

1,220.14

8.0%

12.7%

Achinsk refinery - Nakhodka

4,889.87

4,889.87

-

4,889.87

4,528.16

4,018.57

8.0%

12.7%

Naphtha

Samara refineries - Tuapse

1,868.86

1,868.86

-

1,868.86

1,740.94

1,541.66

7.3%

12.9%

Achinsk refinery - Tuapse

4,297.44

4,297.44

-

4,297.44

3,995.98

3,543.16

7.5%

12.8%

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

3,776.55

3,776.55

-

3,776.55

3,512.37

3,113.97

7.5%

12.8%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

1,496.64

1,496.64

-

1,496.64

1,393.50

1,233.91

7.4%

12.9%

* - oil transportation for Purneftegaz - CPC via Tikhoretskaya station was canceled in June, 2011

 

Source: Transneft, RZD, Rosneft. Mixed export tariffs include transshipment at non-Rosneft terminals. The data is provided for major routes at each direction

 

 

 

The table below presents average tariffs applied for major transportation routes used by Rosneft primarily denominated in RUB and translated to US$ at the average exchange rate for the respective periods:

For 3 months

ended

 change

between

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

 change for

12 months ended

December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011-

2010

2010-

2009

(US$/tonne)

(%)

(US$/tonne)

(%)

CRUDE OIL

Domestic

Pipeline

Yugansk - Samara refineries

23.86

24.92

(4.3)%

24.72

21.36

16.76

15.7%

27.4%

Samara - Samara refineries

1.48

1.57

(5.7)%

1.56

1.36

1.10

14.7%

23.6%

Yugansk - Angarsk refinery

39.54

41.37

(4.4)%

41.04

35.71

28.30

14.9%

26.2%

Purpe - Tuapse refinery

49.42

51.40

(3.9)%

51.06

44.14

34.99

15.7%

26.2%

Tomsk - Achinsk refinery

10.77

11.34

(5.0)%

11.23

9.79

7.74

14.7%

26.5%

Pipeline and railroad

Yugansk - Komsomolsk refinery

126.34

135.11

(6.5)%

133.60

118.76

95.72

12.5%

24.1%

Exports

Pipeline

Yugansk - Primorsk

47.76

45.45

5.1%

45.88

38.32

30.52

19.7%

25.6%

Yugansk - Novorossysk

47.50

50.03

(5.1)%

49.56

43.04

34.65

15.1%

24.2%

Vankor(Purpe)- Tuapse

49.85

51.83

(3.8)%

51.50

44.61

-

15.4%

-

Vankor(Purpe)-Kozmino

60.26

63.11

(4.5)%

62.49

53.81

-

16.1%

-

Railroad and mixed

Purneftegaz - CPC*

-

-

-

69.56

62.03

52.56

12.1%

18.0%

Stavropolneftegaz - CPC(railroad)

21.12

22.71

(7.0)%

22.45

20.12

17.13

11.6%

17.5%

PETROLEUM PRODUCT EXPORTS

Diesel

Samara refineries - Ventspils1

56.90

60.16

(5.4)%

58.84

52.56

46.44

11.9%

13.2%

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

124.56

133.93

(7.0)%

132.37

119.06

101.06

11.2%

17.8%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

48.84

52.51

(7.0)%

51.90

46.73

39.62

11.1%

17.9%

Achinsk refinery - Tuapse

140.22

150.77

(7.0)%

149.02

134.00

113.76

11.2%

17.8%

Fuel oil

Samara refineries - Odessa

88.48

87.37

1.3%

92.32

84.94

73.72

8.7%

15.2%

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

126.93

136.47

(7.0)%

134.89

120.87

102.69

11.6%

17.7%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

47.54

51.12

(7.0)%

50.52

45.27

38.46

11.6%

17.7%

Achinsk refinery - Nakhodka

156.57

168.35

(7.0)%

166.39

149.10

126.68

11.6%

17.7%

Naphtha

Samara refineries - Tuapse

59.84

64.34

(7.0)%

63.59

57.33

48.60

10.9%

18.0%

Achinsk refinery - Tuapse

137.60

147.95

(7.0)%

146.23

131.58

111.69

11.1%

17.8%

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

120.93

130.02

(7.0)%

128.51

115.66

98.16

11.1%

17.8%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

47.92

51.53

(7.0)%

50.93

45.89

38.90

11.0%

18.0%

1- tariff denominated in US$

* - oil transportation for Purneftegaz - CPC via Tikhoretskaya station was canceled in June, 2011

 

Source: Transneft, RZD, Rosneft. Tariffs include transshipment at non-Rosneft terminals. The data is provided for major routes at each direction.

 

Rosneft operates proprietary transportation and transhipment facilities which allow to optimise netbacks. These facilities include: the Arkhangelsk, De-Kastri, Tuapse and Nakhodka export terminals, the Okha- Komsomolsk-on-Amur pipeline, Vankor-Purpe pipeline and the Caspian Pipeline Consortium pipeline in which Rosneft has a stake through a joint venture "Rosneft Shell Caspian Ventures Ltd" (Cyprus).

 

 

 

 

  

Operating Results

 

Production of Crude Oil

Rosneft has twelve fully consolidated production and development enterprises, which produce crude oil in Western Siberia, Eastern Siberia, Timan Pechora, Central Russia, southern part of European Russia and the Russian Far East. The Company also has a 20% stake in the Sakhalin-1 project accounted for using proportionate consolidation method. In addition, Rosneft participates in four production joint ventures accounted for using the equity method (Tomskneft - 50.0%, Udmurtneft - 49.5%, Polar Lights - 50.0%, Verknechonskneftegaz - 25.94%).

 

The following table sets forth Rosneft's crude oil production:

For 3 months

ended

% change

between

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for

12 months ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011-

2010

2010-

2009

(million of barrels, except %)

Yuganskneftegaz (Western Siberia)

122.95

123.36

(0.3)%

488.14

483.23

485.40

1.0%

(0.4)%

Samaraneftegaz (Central Russia)

19.53

19.65

(0.6)%

77.64

75.80

73.81

2.4%

2.7%

Purneftegaz (Western Siberia)

13.06

13.02

0.3%

51.33

52.68

57.15

(2.6)%

(7.8)%

Vankorneft (Eastern Siberia)

29.02

28.99

0.1%

109.74

92.90

26.63

18.1%

248.9%

Severnaya Neft (Timan Pechora)

6.67

6.58

1.4%

26.58

29.87

34.81

(11.0)%

(14.2)%

Sakhalin-1 (Far East)

(net of royalty and government share)

2.33

2.33

-

10.02

9.19

10.09

9.0%

(8.9)%

Other

7.93

8.17

(2.9)%

32.38

35.40

40.17

(8.5)%

(11.9)%

Crude oil production by fully and proportionately consolidated enterprises

201.49

202.10

(0.3)%

795.83

779.07

728.06

2.2%

7.0%

Tomskneft

(Western Siberia)

9.58

9.60

(0.2)%

37.85

37.67

39.75

0.5%

(5.2)%

Udmurtneft (Central Russia)

5.86

5.88

(0.3)%

23.19

23.17

23.01

0.1%

0.7%

Polar Lights (Timan Pechora)

0.55

0.57

(3.5)%

2.23

2.56

3.34

(12.9)%

(23.4)%

Verkhnechonskneftegaz (Eastern Siberia)

2.97

2.58

15.1%

9.54

4.94

2.24

93.1%

120.5%

Total share in production of joint ventures

18.96

18.63

1.8%

72.81

68.34

68.34

6.5%

-

Total crude oil production

220.45

220.73

(0.1)%

868.64

847.41

796.40

2.5%

6.4%

Daily crude oil production

(th. barrels per day)

2,396

2,399

(0.1)%

2,380

2,322

2,182

2.5%

6.4%

In the fourth quarter of 2011 Rosneft's average daily crude oil production reached 2,396 th. barrels per day, which was in line with the production in the third quarter of 2011.

 

In 2011 Rosneft's average daily crude oil production was 2,380 th. barrels per day, which was 2.5% higher than in 2010. The growth was driven primarily by commercial production growth at the Vankor oil field after the launch of new wells and due to the launch of production at Odoptu field in September 2010 at Salhalin-1. Overall production growth was partially offset by the natural decline in production at the fields of Severnaya Neft.

 

In 2010 Rosneft's average daily crude oil production was 2,322 th. barrels per day, which was 6.4% higher than in 2009. The growth was driven primarily by commercial production launch at the Vankor field in July 2009 and production growth at the Verkhnechonsk field and Samaraneftegaz fields.

 

 

  

Production of Gas

 

The table below sets forth Rosneft's gas production*:

For 3 months

ended

% change between

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for

12 months ended December 31

December

31, 2011

September

30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011-

2010

2010-

2009

(bcm, except %)

Purneftegaz (Western Siberia)

1.04

0.89

16.9%

3.71

3.60

3.76

3.1%

(4.3)%

Yuganskneftegaz (Western Siberia)

0.79

0.66

19.7%

2.86

2.65

2.62

7.9%

1.1%

Krasnodarneftegaz (Southern Russia)

0.73

0.62

17.7%

2.73

2.71

2.93

0.7%

(7.5)%

Samaraneftegaz (Central Russia)

0.12

0.13

(7.7)%

0.50

0.47

0.39

6.4%

20.5%

Severnaya Neft (Timan Pechora)

0.06

0.07

(14.3)%

0.26

0.28

0.29

(7.1)%

(3.4)%

Vankorneft (Eastern Siberia)

0.11

0.08

37.5%

0.37

0.28

-

32.1%

-

Sakhalin-1 (Far East)

(net of royalty and government share)

0.10

0.04

150.0%

0.31

0.29

0.26

6.9%

11.5%

Other

0.32

0.30

6.7%

1.25

1.35

1.61

(7.4)%

(16.1)%

Gas production by fully and proportionately consolidated enterprises

3.27

2.79

17.2%

11.99

11.63

11.86

3.1%

(1.9)%

Tomskneft (Western Siberia)

0.23

0.20

15.0%

0.73

0.65

0.77

12.3%

(15.6)%

Udmurtneft (Central Russia)

0.01

0.01

(0.2)%

0.04

0.04

0.03

1.5%

33.3%

Polar Lights (Timan Pechora)

0.01

0.00

8.5%

0.02

0.02

0.02

(2.1)%

(6.9)%

Verkhnechonskneftegaz (Eastern Siberia)

0.01

0.00

69.3%

0.01

0.00

0.00

235.4%

176.2%

Total share in production of joint ventures

0.26

0.21

23.8%

0.80

0.71

0.82

12.7%

(13.4)%

Total gas production

3.53

3.00

17.7%

12.79

12.34

12.68

3.6%

(2.7)%

Natural gas

1.21

1.09

11.0%

4.68

4.66

4.90

0.4%

(4.9)%

Associated gas

2.32

1.91

21.5%

8.11

7.68

7.78

5.5%

1.3%

* Production volume equals extracted volume minus flared volume.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011 Rosneft's natural and associated gas production was 3.53 bcm, which was 17.7% higher than in the third quarter of 2011. The increase was primarily driven by launch of booster compression stations in Yuganskneftegaz and Purneftegaz in the last quarter of 2011and seasonal increase in demand for gas produced by Krasnodarneftegaz.

 

In 2011 Rosneft's natural and associated gas production was 3.6% higher than in 2010, primarily, as a result of increased production of associated gas at Samaraneftegaz, Vankor and Yuganskneftegaz. Launch of new booster compression stations and gas preparations facilities allowed to increase associated gas utilization rates. The increase was partially offset by the natural decline in production of crude oil and associated gas at Severnaya Neft.

 

In 2010 Rosneft's natural and associated gas production was 2.7% lower than in 2009, primarily as a result of required maintenance at Lugenetskaya compression station, as well as decrease in demand for gas produced by Krasnodarneftegaz and decrease in crude oil production at Purneftegaz. The decrease was partially offset by production growth at Yuganskneftegaz and Samaraneftegaz and due to the progress with associated gas utilization programme.

 

Rosneft is implementing a programme aimed at increasing associated gas utilisation rate. The programme envisages construction of gas gathering facilities, booster compression stations and underground storage facilities as well as gas power stations.

 

 

Petroleum Product Output

Rosneft processes produced and procured crude oil at its refineries, including the Tuapse refinery on the Black Sea in the South of Russia, the Komsomolsk refinery in the Russian Far East, the Achinsk and Angarsk refineries in Eastern Siberia and the Kuibyshev, Novokuibyshevsk and Syzran refineries in the Samara region (European part of Russia).

 

Rosneft also owns four mini-refineries (in Western Siberia, Eastern Siberia, Timan-Pechora and the southern part of European Russia), OJSC Angarsk polymer plant (petrochemical block of the Angarsk refinery), LLC Novokuibyshevsk lubricants and additives plant (lubricants block of the Novokuibyshevsk refinery) and OJSC Rosneft-MZ Nefteprodukt (lubricants plant in Moscow).

 

In May, 2011 Rosneft acquired a 50% stake in joint venture Ruhr Oel GmbH, in which the remaining 50% are held by BP. The joint venture has stakes in four refineries in Germany: Gelsenkirchen - 100%; MiRO - 24%; Bayernoil - 25%; and PCK Schwedt - 37.5%. The primary refining capacity of Ruhr Oel GmbH is approximately 23.2 million tonnes per year, thus, Rosneft's share in primary refining capacity comprises approximately 11.6 million tonnes per year. The Gelsenkirchen refinery has a petrochemical block with capacity of 3.9 million tonnes.

 

 

The following table sets forth Rosneft's crude oil processing and petroleum product output volumes:

For 3 months

ended

% change

between 3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for

12 months ended December 31

 

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

 2011-

2010

 2010-

2009

 

(million of tonnes, except %)

 

Crude oil processing at Rosneft's own refineries

13.15

12.81

2.7%

50.65

50.49

49.83

0.3%

1.3%

 

Rosneft's share in crude oil processing at Ruhr Oel Gmbh

2.76

2.82

(2.1)%

7.21

-

-

100.0%

-

Total group crude oil processing

15.91

15.63

1.8%

57.86

50.49

49.83

14.6%

1.3%

Product output:

 

High octane gasoline

1.38

1.43

(3.5)%

5.33

4.92

4.82

8.3%

2.1%

Low octane gasoline

0.08

0.08

-

0.35

1.53

1.37

(77.1)%

11.7%

Naphtha

1.04

0.87

19.5%

3.83

3.13

3.40

22.4%

(7.9)%

Diesel

4.46

4.37

2.1%

17.25

16.84

17.01

2.4%

(1.0)%

Fuel oil

4.39

4.20

4.5%

16.91

17.39

16.47

(2.8)%

5.6%

Jet

0.31

0.33

(6.1)%

1.20

1.10

1.10

9.1%

-

Petrochemicals

0.15

0.08

87.5%

0.54

0.52

0.48

3.8%

8.3%

Other

0.66

0.80

(17.5)%

2.68

2.46

2.41

8.9%

2.1%

Product output at Rosneft's own refineries

12.47

12.16

2.5%

48.08

47.89

47.06

0.4%

1.8%

 

Rosneft's share in product output at Ruhr Oel Gmbh

2.74

2.82

(2.8)%

7.30

-

-

100.0%

-

Total group product output

15.21

14.98

1.5%

55.38

47.89

47.06

15.6%

1.8%

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011, Rosneft's refinery throughput was 1.8% higher than in the third quarter of 2011. Rosneft's refinery throughput in Russia was 2.7% higher than in the third quarter of 2011.The growth was attributed to processing recovery after its decrease in the third quarter due to turnarounds at Angarsk polymer plant, Komsomolsk refinery, Angarsk and Syzran refineries. The increase was mitigated by the decrease of crude oil processing at Ruhr Oel Gmbh due to insignificant seasonal fluctuations. Rosneft's share in processing of non-crude feedstocks at Ruhr Oel Gmbh refinery was 0.30 and 0.38 million tonnes in the fourth and third quarter of 2011, respectively

 

In 2011 Rosneft's refinery throughput was 14.6% higher in comparison to 2010 due to acquisition of share in Ruhr Oel GmbH in May 2011 and crude oil processing growth at Rosneft's own refineries by 0.3%. The decrease in low octane gasoline output and increase in naphtha output was experienced after the introduction of new requirements for Technical regulations to quality of motor fuel introduced since January 2011.

 

In 2010 Rosneft's refinery throughput was 1.8% higher than in 2009. The increase in production of fuel oil was due to a decrease of potential light fractions content in the oil processed at Kuibyshev, Novokuibyshevsk, Tuapse and Komsomolsk refineries, as well as decrease in demand for products produced from fuel oil.

 

 

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth the statement of income information both in absolute values and as a percentage of total revenues:

For 3 months ended

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

Change

% of total revenue

% of total revenue

%

(US$ million, except %)

Revenues

Oil and gas sales

11,932

49.8%

12,170

49.4%

(2.0)%

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

11,685

48.8%

12,100

49.1%

(3.4)%

Support services and other revenues

334

1.4%

357

1.4%

(6.4)%

Total revenues

23,951

100.0%

24,627

100.0%

(2.7)%

Cost and expenses

Production and operating expenses

1,650

6.9%

1,870

7.6%

(11.8)%

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products

3,437

14.4%

3,062

12.4%

12.2%

General and administrative expenses

490

2.0%

487

2.0%

0.6%

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

1,751

7.3%

1,740

7.1%

0.6%

Exploration expenses

220

0.9%

60

0.2%

266.7%

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation

1,619

6.8%

1,549

6.3%

4.5%

Accretion expense

35

0.1%

41

0.2%

(14.6)%

Taxes other than income tax

4,513

18.8%

4,554

18.5%

(0.9)%

Export customs duty

7,137

29.8%

7,571

30.7%

(5.7)%

Total cost and expenses

20,852

87.1%

20,934

85.0%

(0.4)%

Operating income

3,099

12.9%

3,693

15.0%

(16.1)%

Other income/(expenses)

Interest income

152

0.6%

155

0.6%

(1.9)%

Interest expense

(19)

(0.1)%

(67)

(0.3)%

(71.6)%

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

(78)

(0.3)%

(104)

(0.4)%

(25.0)%

Gain/(loss) on disposal of investments

24

0.1%

16

0.1%

50.0%

Equity share in affiliates' profits

192

0.8%

213

0.9%

(9.9)%

Dividends and income from joint ventures

3

(100.0)%

Other (expenses)/income, net

260

1.1%

(120)

(0.5)%

(316.7)%

Foreign exchange (loss)/gain

(207)

(0.9)%

(358)

(1.5)%

(42.2)%

Total other expenses

324

1.4%

(262)

(1.1)%

(223.7)%

Income before income tax and minority interest

3,423

14.3%

3,431

13.9%

(0.2)%

Income tax

(425)

(1.8)%

(613)

(2.5)%

(30.7)%

Net income

2,998

12.5%

2,818

11.4%

6.4%

Less: net income attributable

to noncontrolling interests

(6)

0.0%

(40)

(0.2)%

(85.0)%

Net income attributable to Rosneft

2,992

12.5%

2,778

11.3%

7.7%

Other comprehensive income

50

0.2%

(24)

(0.1)%

(308.3)%

Comprehensive income

3,042

12.7%

2,754

11.2%

10.5%

 

 

 

 

 

The table below provides information on the Results of Operations for the period 2011, 2010 and 2009:

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change

2011

2010

2009

2011 -2010

2010 -2009

(US$ million, except %)

Revenues

Oil and gas sales

47,417

34,767

24,820

36.4%

40.1%

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

43,020

26,660

20,736

61.4%

28.6%

Support services and other revenues

1,538

1,620

1,270

(5.1)%

27.6%

Total revenues

91,975

63,047

46,826

45.9%

34.6%

Cost and expenses

Production and operating expenses

6,540

4,792

4,024

36.5%

19.1%

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products

10,058

2,386

1,890

321.5%

26.2%

General and administrative expenses

1,785

1,584

1,416

12.7%

11.9%

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

7,329

6,980

5,414

5.0%

28.9%

Exploration expenses

448

439

325

2.1%

35.1%

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation

5,996

5,597

4,350

7.1%

28.7%

Accretion expense

146

107

87

36.4%

23.0%

Taxes other than income tax

16,911

10,920

8,061

54.9%

35.5%

Export customs duty

26,882

16,743

12,131

60.6%

38.0%

Total cost and expenses

76,095

49,548

37,698

53.6%

31.4%

Operating income

15,880

13,499

9,128

17.6%

47.9%

Other income/(expenses)

Interest income

658

547

516

20.3%

6.0%

Interest expense

(320)

(580)

(605)

(44.8)%

(4.1)%

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

(230)

(156)

(350)

47.4%

(55.4)%

(Loss)/gain on disposal of investments

39

23

5

69.6%

360.0%

Equity share in affiliates' profits

577

60

112

861.7%

(46.4)%

Dividends and income from joint ventures

11

11

(8)

0.0%

(237.5)%

Other (expenses)/income, net

(260)

(120)

(350)

116.7%

(65.7)%

Foreign exchange (loss)/gain

(649)

32

71

(2,128.1)%

(54.9)%

Total other expenses

(174)

(183)

(609)

(4.9)%

(70.0)%

Income before income tax and minority interest

15,706

13,316

8,519

17.9%

56.3%

Income tax

(3,117)

(2,644)

(2,000)

17.9%

32.2%

Net income

12,589

10,672

6,519

18.0%

63.7%

Less: net income attributable

to noncontrolling interests

(137)

(272)

(5)

(49.6)%

5,340%

Net income attributable to Rosneft

12,452

10,400

6,514

19.7%

59.7%

Other comprehensive income

53

2

18

2,550.0%

(88.9)%

Comprehensive income

12,505

10,402

6,532

20.2%

59.2%

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011 revenues were 2.7% lower than in the third quarter of 2011 and amounted to US$ 23,951 million. Revenue decrease mainly resulted from reduction in market prices of crude oil and petroleum products.

 

In 2011 revenues were 45.9% higher compared to 2010, which was driven by substantial increase in prices and volumes growth. For example, Urals price increased by 39.4% and the world market prices for diesel and fuel oil rose by 39.1% and 37.7% respectively. Sales volumes growth by 9.2% is attributable to increased oil production and refinery throughput.

 

Revenues were US$ 63,047 million in 2010, 34.6% higher compared with 2009,which was driven by substantial increase in prices and volumes growth.

 

The table below presents revenues from sales of crude oil, gas, petroleum and petrochemical products and other revenues:

For 3 months

ended

change

between

 3d and4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

change for

12 months

ended

December 31

December

 31, 2011

September

 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -

2010

 2010-

2009

%

of total revenue

%of total revenue

%

%

of total revenue

%

of total revenue

%

of total revenue

%

(US$ million, except %)

Crude oil

International Sales to non-CIS

11,343

47.4%

11,485

46.6%

(1.2)%

44,983

48.9%

32,719

51.9%

23,019

49.1%

37.5%

42.1%

Europe and other directions

8,367

34.9%

8,478

34.4%

(1.3)%

32,495

35.3%

22,895

36.3%

18,275

39.0%

41.9%

25.3%

Asia

2,976

12.5%

3,007

12.2%

(1.0)%

12,488

13.6%

9,824

15.6%

4,744

10.1%

27.1%

107.1%

International sales to CIS

441

1.8%

547

2.2%

(19.4)%

1,847

2.0%

1,363

2.2%

1,313

2.8%

35.5%

3.8%

Domestic

26

0.1%

17

0.1%

52.9%

100

0.1%

269

0.4%

134

0.3%

(62.8)%

100.7%

Total crude oil

11,810

49.3%

12,049

48.9%

(2.0)%

46,930

51.0%

34,351

54.5%

24,466

52.2%

36.6%

40.4%

Gas

122

0.5%

121

0.5%

0.8%

487

0.5%

416

0.7%

354

0.8%

17.1%

17.5%

Petroleum products

International Sales to non-CIS

6,789

28.4%

6,598

26.8%

2.9%

24,168

26.3%

14,141

22.4%

11,622

24.8%

70.9%

21.7%

Europe and other directions

4,830

20.2%

4,855

19.7%

(0.5)%

16,552

18.0%

8,156

12.9%

6,727

14.4%

102.9%

21.2%

Asia

1,959

8.2%

1,743

7.1%

12.4%

7,616

8.3%

5,985

9.5%

4,895

10.4%

27.3%

22.3%

International Sales to CIS

61

0.2%

101

0.4%

(39.6)%

277

0.3%

172

0.3%

144

0.3%

61.0%

19.4%

Domestic

3,859

16.1%

4,300

17.5%

(10.3)%

15,256

16.6%

11,192

17.7%

8,304

17.8%

36.3%

34.8%

Wholesale

2,261

9.4%

2,616

10.7%

(13.6)%

9,210

10.0%

7,241

11.4%

5,183

11.1%

27.2%

39.7%

Retail

1,598

6.7%

1,684

6.8%

(5.1)%

6,046

6.6%

3,951

6.3%

3,121

6.7%

53.0%

26.6%

Sales of bunker fuel to end-users

334

1.4%

407

1.7%

(17.9)%

1,293

1.4%

739

1.2%

426

0.9%

75.0%

73.5%

Total petroleum products

11,043

46.1%

11,406

46.4%

(3.2)%

40,994

44.6%

26,244

41.6%

20,496

43.8%

56.2%

28.0%

Petrochemical products

642

2.7%

694

2.8%

(7.5)%

2,026

2.2%

416

0.6%

240

0.5%

387.0%

73.3%

International sales

563

2.4%

636

2.6%

(11.5)%

1,693

1.8%

120

0.1%

70

0.1%

1,310.8%

71.4%

Domestic

79

0.3%

58

0.2%

36.2%

333

0.4%

296

0.5%

170

0.4%

12.5%

74.1%

Support services and other revenues

334

1.4%

357

1.4%

(6.4)%

1,538

1.7%

1,620

2.6%

1,270

2.7%

(5.1)%

27.6%

Total sales

23,951

100.0%

24,627

100.0%

(2.7)%

91,975

100.0%

63,047

100.0%

46,826

100.0%

45.9%

34.6%

 

 

  

 

 

Sales Volumes

 

The table below analyses crude oil, gas and petroleum and petrochemical product sales volumes:

For 3 months

ended

change between

3d and4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

change for

12 months

ended

December 31

December

31, 2011

September

30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -2010

2010- 2009

Crude oil

mln

bbls

%

of total volume

mln

bbls

%

of total volume

%

mln

bbls

%

of total volume

mln

bbls

%

of total volume

mln

bbls

%

of total volume

%

International Sales to non-CIS

110.31

48.1%

108.84

46.7%

1.4%

433.86

49.0%

420.46

51.8%

381.33

50.1%

3.2%

10.3%

Europe and other directions

77.83

33.9%

76.95

33.0%

1.1%

301.09

34.0%

296.84

36.6%

304.30

40.0%

1.4%

(2.5)%

Asia

32.48

14.2%

31.89

13.7%

1.9%

132.77

15.0%

123.62

15.2%

77.03

10.1%

7.4%

60.5%

CIS

8.34

3.6%

10.17

4.3%

(18.0)%

33.65

3.8%

24.51

3.0%

30.58

4.0%

37.3%

(19.8)%

Domestic

0.66

0.3%

0.37

0.2%

78.4%

2.19

0.2%

8.85

1.1%

4.97

0.7%

(75.3)%

78.1%

Total crude oil

119.31

52.0%

119.38

51.2%

(0.1)%

469.70

53.0%

453.82

55.9%

416.88

54.8%

3.5%

8.9%

Crude oil

mln tonnes

mln tonnes

mln tonnes

mln tonnes

mln tonnes

International Sales to non-CIS

15.08

48.1%

14.88

46.7%

1.4%

59.31

49.0%

57.48

51.8%

52.13

50.1%

3.2%

10.3%

Europe and other directions

10.64

33.9%

10.52

33.0%

1.1%

41.16

34.0%

40.58

36.6%

41.60

40.0%

1.4%

(2.5)%

Asia

4.44

14.2%

4.36

13.7%

1.9%

18.15

15.0%

16.90

15.2%

10.53

10.1%

7.4%

60.5%

CIS

1.14

3.6%

1.39

4.3%

(18.0)%

4.60

3.8%

3.35

3.0%

4.18

4.0%

37.3%

(19.8)%

Domestic

0.09

0.3%

0.05

0.2%

78.4%

0.30

0.2%

1.21

1.1%

0.68

0.7%

(75.3)%

78.1%

Total crude oil

16.31

52.0%

16.32

51.2%

(0.1)%

64.21

53.0%

62.04

55.9%

56.99

54.8%

3.5%

8.9%

Petroleum products

International Sales to non-CIS

8.26

26.3%

8.19

25.7%

0.9%

30.41

25.1%

25.51

23.0%

27.15

26.2%

19.2%

(6.0)%

Europe and other directions

5.93

18.9%

6.09

19.1%

(2.6)%

21.05

17.4%

15.39

13.9%

16.38

15.8%

36.8%

(6.0)%

Asia

2.33

7.4%

2.10

6.6%

11.0%

9.36

7.7%

10.12

9.1%

10.77

10.4%

(7.5)%

(6.0)%

International Sales to CIS

0.08

0.3%

0.14

0.4%

(42.9)%

0.37

0.3%

0.30

0.3%

0.36

0.3%

23.3%

(16.7)%

Domestic

5.36

17.1%

5.79

18.2%

(7.4)%

21.43

17.7%

20.49

18.5%

17.60

16.9%

4.6%

16.4%

Wholesale

3.63

11.6%

4.08

12.8%

(11.0)%

14.88

12.3%

15.23

13.8%

12.83

12.3%

(2.3)%

18.7%

Retail

1.73

5.5%

1.71

5.4%

1.2%

6.55

5.4%

5.26

4.7%

4.77

4.6%

24.5%

10.3%

Sales of bunker fuel to end-users

0.63

2.0%

0.74

2.3%

(14.9)%

2.46

2.0%

1.83

1.6%

1.20

1.2%

34.4%

52.5%

Total petroleum products

14.33

45.7%

14.86

46.6%

(3.6)%

54.67

45.1%

48.13

43.4%

46.31

44.6%

13.6%

3.9%

Petrochemical products

0.73

2.3%

0.70

2.2%

4.3%

2.21

1.9%

0.74

0.7%

0.66

0.6%

198.6%

12.1%

International sales

0.57

1.8%

0.58

1.8%

(1.7)%

1.52

1.3%

0.12

0.1%

0.10

0.1%

1,166.7%

20.0%

Domestic

0.16

0.5%

0.12

0.4%

33.3%

0.69

0.6%

0.62

0.6%

0.56

0.5%

11.3%

10.7%

Total crude oil and products

31.37

100.0%

31.88

100.0%

(1.6)%

121.09

100.0%

110.91

100.0%

103.96

100.0%

9.2%

6.7%

Gas

bcm

bcm

bcm

bcm

bcm

Sales Volumes

2.46

2.33

5.6%

9.74

9.80

10.61 

(0.6)%

(7.6)% 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Crude Oil and Petroleum Product Sales Prices 

 

The following table sets forth Rosneft's average export and domestic prices of crude oil, gas and petroleum products (the average sales prices may differ from official market prices provided by specialized agencies due to different quality of products and conditions of sales):

3 month ended

% change between 3d and 4th quarters

2011

2010

2009

% change for

12 months ended

December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

Average export prices

(US$/

barrel)

(US$/

tonne)

(US$/

barrel)

(US$/

tonne)

2011

(US$/

barrel)

(US$/

tonne)

(US$/

barrel)

(US$/

tonne)

(US$/

barrel)

(US$/

tonne)

 2011 -2010

 2010-2009

Crude oil, excluding CIS

102.83

752.19

105.52

771.84

(2.5)%

103.68

758.44

77.82

569.22

60.37

441.57

33.2%

28.9%

Europe and other directions

107.50

786.37

110.18

805.89

(2.4)%

107.92

789.48

77.13

564.19

60.06

439.30

39.9%

28.4%

Asia

91.63

670.27

94.29

689.68

(2.8)%

94.06

688.04

79.47

581.30

61.59

450.52

18.4%

29.0%

Crude oil, CIS

52.88

386.84

53.79

393.53

(1.7)%

54.89

401.52

55.61

406.87

42.94

314.11

(1.3)%

29.5%

Petroleum products, non- CIS

821.91

805.62

2.0%

794.74

554.33

428.07

43.4%

29.5%

Europe and other directions

814.50

797.21

2.2%

786.32

529.95

410.68

48.4%

29.0%

Asia

840.77

830.00

1.3%

813.68

591.40

454.50

37.6%

30.1%

Petroleum products, CIS

762.50

721.43

5.7%

748.65

573.33

400.00

30.6%

43.3%

Average domestic prices

Crude oil

46.95

343.47

46.71

341.71

0.5%

47.22

345.39

30.40

222.31

26.96

197.06

55.4%

12.8%

Petroleum products

719.96

742.66

(3.1)%

711.90

546.22

471.82

30.3%

15.8%

Wholesale

622.87

641.18

(2.9)%

618.95

475.44

403.98

30.2%

17.7%

Retail

923.70

984.80

(6.2)%

923.05

751.14

654.30

22.9%

14.8%

Gas (US$/thousand cubic meter)

49.59

51.93

(4.5)%

50.00

42.45

33.36

17.8%

27.2%

Sales of bunker fuel to end-users

530.16

550.00

(3.6)%

525.61

403.83

355.00

30.2%

13.8%

Petrochemical products

879.45

991.43

(11.3)%

916.74

562.16

363.64

63.1%

54.6%

International sales

987.72

1,096.55

(9.9)%

1,113.82

1,000.00

700.00

11.4%

42.9%

Domestic

493.75

483.33

2.2%

482.61

477.42

303.57

1.1%

57.3%

 

International Crude Oil Sales to non-CIS

 

Revenues from crude oil exports to non-CIS countries in the fourth quarter of 2011 were US$ 11,343 million which is a decrease of 1.2% quarter-on-quarter. Average prices downturn of 2.5% (unfavourable impact on revenues of US$ 296 million) was partially compensated by sales volumes growth of 1.4% (positive impact on revenues of US$ 154 million). Sales volumes increase is attributable to redirection of crude oil flows from CIS following CIS export quota exhaustion.

 

In 2011 revenues from crude oil exports to non-CIS countries increased by 37.5% compared to 2010, which was driven by a 33.2% increase in average export prices (positive impact on revenues of US$ 11,222 million) and a 3.2% increase in sales volumes (favourable impact on revenues of US$ 1,042 million). Export sales volumes growth was due to increased production at Vankor.

 

The deviation between average sales prices on the Asian markets and world market prices in 2011 is due to start of deliveries to Transneft of 6 mln tonnes of crude oil per year under the contract signed in 2009. These volumes are sold to Transneft at price based on international crude oil prices (excluding export duty) and are reflected as international sales in Company's sales structure. Crude oil sales to Transneft (6.00 mln. tonnes) were the major factor of change in international crude oil sales structure. Excluding revenues from crude oil sales to Transneft (US$ 2,586 million) in 2011 the average sales price on the Asian markets was equal to US$ 111.41 per barrel.

 

In 2010 revenues from crude oil exports to non-CIS countries were US$ 32,719 million or 42.1% higher compared with 2009, which was driven by a 28.9% increase in average export prices (positive impact on revenues of US$ 7,337 million) and a 10.3% increase in sales volumes (favourable impact on revenues of US$ 2,363 million).

Crude Oil Supplies to Ruhr Oel GmbH

 

In May 2011 Rosneft started supplies of its own crude oil to Ruhr Oel GmbH. These supplies amounted to 1.08 million tonnes (7.93 million barrels) for the 12 months of 2011 (Rosneft paid US$ 499 million of export duties on this crude oil). This crude oil was fully processed and sold as of December 31, 2011.

Rosneft did not accomplish its own crude oil deliveries to Ruhr Oel GmbH in the fourth quarter of 2011.

 

Besides supplies of own crude oil Rosneft acquired 6.14 million tonnes (44.35 million barrels) of crude oil on the international market for US$ 5,050 million to supply to Ruhr Oel GmbH. These expenses are reflected in the cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

 

International Crude Oil Sales to CIS

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011 revenues from sales of crude oil to CIS were US$ 441 million, 19.4% lower than in the thirdquarter of 2011. Sales volumes decrease of 18.0% and average prices downturn of 1.7% led to revenues reduction of US$ 98 million and US$ 8 million, respectively. Sales volumes decrease in the last quarter of 2011 is attributed to CIS crude oil export quota exhaustion and followed redirection of crude oil export volumes to non-CIS countries.

 

In 2011 revenues from crude oil exports to CIS countries were US$ 484 million higher in comparison with 2010, which is attributable to sales volumes increase of 37.3% (positive impact on revenues of US$ 509 million). Insignificant decline in average price by 1.3% led to revenue reduction of US$ 25 million. Sales volumes increase is due to custom duties cancellation on crude oil export to Belarus.

 

In 2010 revenues from sales of crude oil to the CIS were US$ 1,363million, which is an increase of 3.8% compared with 2009, which is attributable to an average price increase of 29.5% (positive impact on revenues of US$ 311 million). A 19.8% sales volumes decrease had an unfavourable impact on revenues of US$ 261 million.

 

Domestic Crude Oil Sales

In the fourth quarter of 2011 domestic crude oil sales were US$ 26million, 52.9% higher than in the third quarter of 2011. A 78.4% increase in sales volumes and 0.5% upturn in average prices led to revenue growth of US$ 9 million.

 

In 2011 revenues from crude oil sales on domestic market were 62.8% lower compared to 2010. The reduction was driven by a 75.3% decrease in sales volumes (unfavorable impact on revenues of US$ 202 million) and was partially compensated by average prices upturn of 55.4% (positive impact on revenues of US$ 33 million). Sales volumes decrease resulted from sales reduction after the start of deliveries to Transneft.

 

In 2010 domestic crude oil sales were US$ 269 million, which is an increase of 100.7% compared with 2009. The growth was driven by a 78.1% increase in sales volumes (favorable impact on revenues of US$ 104 million) as well as by a 12.8% increase in average prices (positive impact on revenues of US$ 31 million).

 

 

 

 

  International Petroleum Product Sales to Non-CIS

 

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold to non-CIS countries:

 

Average prices of petroleum product sales may vary significantly depending on the market mainly due to different product mix.

For 3 months ended

% change

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

US$ million

million of tonnes

Average price US$/tonne

US$ million

million of

tonnes

Average price US$/tonne

US$ million

million

of tonnes

Average price US$/tonne

High octane gasoline

76

0.07

1,059.57

81

0.07

1,087.60

(6.2)%

0.0%

(2.6)%

Low octane gasoline

39

0.04

1,055.18

40

0.04

1,071.07

(2.5)%

0.0%

(1.5)%

Naphtha

745

0.88

850.62

817

0.88

932.03

(8.8)%

0.0%

(8.7)%

Diesel (Gasoil)

1,809

1.93

935.66

1,181

1.26

938.88

53.2%

53.2%

(0.3)%

Fuel oil

1,956

3.03

646.02

2,295

3.60

637.46

(14.8)%

(15.8)%

1.3%

Jet fuel

6

0.01

1,130.63

6

0.01

1,095.59

0.0%

0.0%

3.2%

Other

47

0.07

852.28

64

0.07

887.53

(26.6)%

0.0%

(4.0)%

Total petroleum products exported to non-CIS

4,678

6.03

775.79

4,484

5.93

756.16

4.3%

1.7%

2.6%

Petroleum products sold from ROG refineries

2,111

2.23

947.98

2,114

2.26

936.00

(0.1)%

(1.3)%

1.3%

Total

6,789

8.26

821.91

6,598

8.19

805.62

2.9%

0.9%

2.0%

 

Average prices of petroleum product sales may vary significantly depending on the market mainly due to different product mix.

 

Revenues from the export of petroleum products to non-CIS countries were US$ 6,789 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, which is an increase of 2.9% compared with the third quarter of 2011. A 2.0% increase in average prices (favourable impact on revenues of US$ 135 million) was accompanied by 0.9% increase in sales volumes (positive impact on revenues of US$ 56 million). Increase in diesel export volumes in the last quarter of 2011 took place after redirection of respective volumes from domestic market followed after predicted demand decrease on summer diesel on domestic market. On the other hand seasonal increase in consumption of fuel oil on domestic market resulted in redirection of respective volumes from non-CIS international sales.

 

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold to non-CIS countries:

For 12 months ended December 31

 

% change between

12 months ended

 December 31,

2011 and 2010

% change between

12 months ended

 December 31,

2010 and 2009

2011

2010

2009

US$ million

million of tonnes

US$/

tonne

US$ million

million of tonnes

US$/

tonne

US$ million

million of tonnes

US$/

tonne

US$ million

million of tonnes

US$/

tonne

US$ million

million of tonnes

US$/

tonne

High octane gasoline

497

0.54

922.21

127

0.15

837.02

127

0.21

595.06

291.3%

260.0%

10.2%

0.0%

(28.6)%

40.7%

Low octane gasoline

227

0.24

946.42

140

0.20

713.36

108

0.17

625.60

62.1%

20.0%

32.7%

29.6%

17.6%

14.0%

Naphtha

3,195

3.51

909.60

2,188

3.11

702.51

1,704

3.31

514.86

46.0%

12.9%

29.5%

28.4%

(6.0)%

36.4%

Diesel (gasoil)

6,189

6.77

913.84

5,386

8.23

654.47

4,565

9.35

488.11

14.9%

(17.7)%

39.6%

18.0%

(12.0)%

34.1%

Fuel oil

8,196

13.09

626.27

6,082

13.51

450.07

4,944

13.76

359.25

34.8%

(3.1)%

39.1%

23.0%

(1.8)%

25.3%

Jet fuel

21

0.02

1,076.09

12

0.02

771.80

47

0.09

546.31

75.0%

0.0%

39.4%

(74.5)%

(77.8)%

41.3%

Other

237

0.31

786.72

206

0.29

690.30

127

0.26

486.84

15.0%

6.9%

14.0%

62.2%

11.5%

41.8%

Total petroleum products exported to non-CIS

18,562

24.48

758.25

14,141

25.51

554.33

11,622

27.15

428.07

31.3%

(4.0)%

36.8%

21.7%

(6.0)%

29.5%

Petroleum products sold

 from ROG refineries

5,606

5.93

946.17

Total

24,168

30.41

794.74

14,141

25.51

554.33

11,622

27.15

428.07

70.9%

19.2%

43.4%

21.7%

(6.0)%

29.5%

 

 

In 2011 revenues from the export of petroleum products to non-CIS countries were 70.9% higher compared to 2010 which was driven by a 43.4% upturn in average prices and sales volumes growth of 19.2% (positive impact on revenues of US$ 7,311 million and US$ 2,716 million, respectively).

 

Petroleum products sales to non-CIS countries net of Ruhr Oel GmbH sales volumes decreased by 4.0%. Thus attributed to increase in demand on domestic market and followed redirection of respective sales volumes. Gasoline and naphtha international sales followed after revision of Technical regulations on quality of motor fuel introduced since January 2011.

 

Revenues from petroleum product exports to non-CIS countries were US$ 14,141million in 2010, which is a decrease of 21.7% compared with 2009, which was driven by a 29.5% increase in average prices (positive impact on revenues of US$ 3,221 million). Sales volumes decrease of 6.0% had a negative impact on revenues of US$ 702 million. 

 

International Petroleum Product Sales to CIS

 

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold to CIS countries:

For 3 months ended

% change

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2010

US$

million

million of tonnes

Average price US$/tonne

US$

million

million of tonnes

Average price US$/tonne

US$

million

million of tonnes

Average

price US$/tonne

High octane gasoline

9

0.01

659.23

54

0.08

675.71

(83.3)%

(87.5)%

(2.4)%

Low octane gasoline

Naphtha

Diesel

38

0.05

756.84

30

0.04

781.86

26.7%

25.0%

(3.2)%

Fuel oil

Jet fuel

Other

14

0.02

802.69

17

0.02

772.50

(17.6)%

0.0%

3.9%

Total

61

0.08

762.50

101

0.14

721.43

(39.6)%

(42.9)%

5.7%

Revenues from sales of petroleum products to CIS countries in the fourth quarter of 2011were 39.6% lower than in the third quarter of 2011 and amounted to US$ 61 million. The decrease was driven by sales volumes decrease of 42.9% (unfavourable impact on revenues of US$ 43 million), which was partially compensated by 5.7% upturn in average prices (a positive impact on revenues of US$ 3 million). Sales volumes decrease is attributable to the redirection of high octane gasoline to domestic market.

 

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold to CIS countries:

For 12 months ended December 31

%

% change between

12  months ended

 December 31, 2011 and 2010

%

change between

12 months ended

 December 31, 2010 and 2009

2011

2010

2009

US$ million

million of

tonnes

US$/

Tonne

US$ million

million of

tonnes

US$/

Tonne

US$ million

million of

tonnes

US$/

Tonne

US$ million

million of

tonnes

US$/

Tonne

US$ million

million of

tonnes

US$/

Tonne

High octane gasoline

113

0.17

666.39

8

0.02

403.25

27

0.07

415.36

1 312.5%

750.0%

65.3%

(70.4)%

(71.4)%

(2.9)%

Low octane gasoline

3

0.01

300.00

3

0.01

251.82

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

19.1%

Naphtha

2

0.01

346.70

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

Diesel

109

0.14

804.16

83

0.14

569.83

60

0.14

411.59

31.3%

0.0%

41.1%

38.3%

0.0%

38.4%

Fuel oil

3

0.01

417.45

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

Jet fuel

7

0.02

414.10

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

Other

55

0.06

857.63

75

0.12

635.58

45

0.11

410.35

(26.7)%

(50.0)%

34.9%

66.7%

9.1%

54.9%

Total

277

0.37

748.65

172

0.30

573.33

144

0.36

400.00

61.0%

23.3%

30.6%

19.4%

(16.7)%

43.3%

 

Revenue increase of US$ 105 million in 2011 in comparison with 2010 resulted from 30.6% upturn in average prices (positive impact on revenues of US$ 65 million) and 23.3% increase in sales volumes (favourable impact on revenues of US$ 40 million).

 

Revenues from sales of petroleum products to the CIS in 2010 were 19.4% higherthan in 2009 and amounted to US$ 172 million, which was a result of 43.3% upturn in average prices (positive impact on revenues of US$ 52 million) which was partially offset by 16.7% decrease in sales volumes (negative impact on revenues of US$ 24 million).

 

Domestic Sales of Petroleum Products

 

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold in Russia:

For 3 months ended

% change

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

US$

million

million of tonnes

Average price US$/tonne

US$

million

million of tonnes

Average price US$/tonne

US$

million

million

of tonnes

Average price US$/tonne

High octane gasoline

1,516

1.64

923.53

1,714

1.71

999.55

(11.6)%

(4.1)%

(7.6)%

Low octane gasoline

54

0.07

825.01

30

0.03

876.12

80.0%

133.3%

(5.8)%

Naphtha

Diesel

1,585

2.1

753.12

1,915

2.79

686.43

(17.2)%

(24.7)%

9.7%

Fuel oil

227

0.7

325.74

109

0.32

345.04

108.3%

118.8%

(5.6)%

Jet fuel

231

0.29

810.33

240

0.32

757.93

(3.8)%

(9.4)%

6.9%

Other

246

0.56

441.08

292

0.62

468.17

(15.8)%

(9.7)%

(5.8)%

Total

3,859

5.36

719.96

4,300

5.79

742.66

(10.3)%

(7.4)%

(3.1)%

 

 

Revenues from sales of petroleum products on the domestic market were US$ 3,859million in the fourth quarter of 2011, which is a decrease of 10.3% compared with the third quarter of 2011. Revenue reduction was caused by a 7.4% decrease in sales volumes and a 3.1% downturn in average prices (unfavourable impact on revenues of US$ 319 million and US$ 122 million, respectively). Sales volumes decrease was due to a seasonal reduction in demand for summer diesel, resulting to its redirection to foreign markets, and decreased sales to agricultural enterprises. Seasonal increased demand on fuel oil on domestic market led to its redirection of respective volumes from non-CIS markets.

 

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold in Russia:

For 12 months ended December 31

%

change between

12 months ended

December 31, 2011 and 2010

%

change between

12 months ended

 December 31,2010 and 2009

2011

2010

2009

US$ million

million of

tonnes

US$/

Tonne

US$ million

million of

tonnes

US$/

Tonne

US$ million

million of

tonnes

US$/

Tonne

US$ million

million of

tonnes

US$/

Tonne

US$ million

million of

tonnes

US$/

Tonne

High octane gasoline

5,917

6.34

934.06

4,159

5.44

765.11

3,194

4.77

670.09

42.3%

16.5%

22.1%

30.2%

14.0%

14.2%

Low octane gasoline

233

0.31

760.56

807

1.36

593.84

654

1.24

528.86

(71.1)%

(77.2)%

28.1%

23.4%

9.7%

12.3%

Naphtha

Diesel

6,693

9.47

706.89

4,341

8.27

525.50

3,142

7.03

447.25

54.2%

14.5%

34.5%

38.2%

17.6%

17.5%

Fuel oil

645

2.09

308.80

643

2.51

256.54

354

1.63

218.04

0.3%

(16.7)%

20.4%

81.6%

54.0%

17.7%

Jet fuel

848

1.13

751.40

531

0.98

542.16

228

0.48

470.56

59.7%

15.3%

38.6%

132.9%

104.2%

15.2%

Other

920

2.09

439.44

711

1.93

365.10

732

2.45

294.61

29.4%

8.3%

20.4%

(2.9)%

(21.2)%

23.9%

Total

15,256

21.43

711.90

11,192

20.49

546.22

8,304

17.60

471.82

36.3%

4.6%

30.3%

34.8%

16.4%

15.8%

 

In 2011 revenues from sales of petroleum products on the domestic market increased by 36.3% compared to 2010. This resulted from a 30.3% upturn in average prices (positive impact on revenues of US$ 3,551 million) and from a 4.6% increase in sales volumes (favourable impact on revenues of US$ 513 million). Volumes growth was due to the increased demand for petroleum products.

 

Revenues from sales of petroleum products on the domestic market were US$ 11,192million in 2010 which is a increase of 34.8% compared with 2009. This resulted from a 15.8% upturn in average prices (positive impact on revenues of US$ 1,524 million) and from a 16.4% increase in sales volumes (favourable impact on revenues of US$ 1,364 million).

 

Sales of bunker fuel to end-users

Rosneft is selling bunker fuel (fuel oil and diesel fuel) in the ports of the Russian Federation including seaports of Far East, North and South of European part of Russia, as well as river ports.

 

Revenues from sales of bunker fuel in the fourth quarter of 2011 were US$ 334million, а decrease of 17.9% in comparison with the third quarter of 2011. Revenue decline was due to seasonal factor.

 

Revenues from sales of bunker fuel in 2011 were US$ 1,293 million an increase of 75.0% compared to 2010. In 2010 and 2009 revenues were US$ 739 million and US$ 426 million respectively.

 

Petrochemical Product Sales

 

Revenues from sales of petrochemical products in the fourth quarter of 2011were US$ 642 million, down 7.5% compared to the third quarter of 2011. Average price decline of 11.3% (negative impact on revenues of US$ 82 million) was partially compensated by sales volumes increase of 4.3% (favourable impact on revenues of US$ 30 million). Sales volumes increase was due to increased output of petrochemical products.

 

A 387.0% growth in revenues from sales of petrochemical products in 2011compared to 2010 was mainly due to acquisition of share in Ruhr Oel GmbH.

In 2010 revenues from sales of petrochemical products were US$ 416 million, 73.3% up compared to2009. It was due to price increase of 54.6% and volume growth of 12.1%. 

 

Gas Sales

Rosneft's gas sales have been limited to date, but the Company's long term strategy envisages significant expansion of its gas business. Gazprom controls the Unified Gas Supply System (UGSS) and is the dominant gas supplier in Russia and the only exporter of gas.

 

The table below sets forth revenues, volumes and average price of gas sales by Rosneft:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for

12 months ended

December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -

2010

 2010-

2009

Revenue

(US$ million, except %)

Western Siberia

35

35

0.0%

136

118

114

15.3%

3.5%

South Russia

57

56

1.8%

233

198

157

17.7%

26.1%

Far East

9

10

(10.0)%

43

37

36

16.2%

2.8%

European part of Russia

21

20

5.0%

75

63

47

19.0%

34.0%

Total

122

121

0.8%

487

416

354

17.1%

17.5%

Sales volumes

(bcm. except %)

Western Siberia

1.28

1.28

0.0%

5.12

5.24

5.98

(2.3)%

(12.4)%

South Russia

0.76

0.65

16.9%

2.91

3.04

3.24

(4.3)%

(6.2)%

Far East

0.15

0.15

0.0%

0.66

0.66

0.62

0.0%

6.5%

European part of Russia

0.27

0.25

8.0%

1.05

0.86

0.77

22.1%

11.7%

Total

2.46

2.33

5.6%

9.74

9.80

10.61

(0.6)%

(7.6)%

Average price

(US$/thousand of cubic metres. except %)

Western Siberia

27.42

27.53

(0.4)%

26.53

22.44

19.13

18.2%

17.3%

South Russia

75.29

86.37

(12.8)%

80.16

65.13

48.44

23.1%

34.5%

Far East

60.53

66.85

(9.5)%

65.03

56.59

57.83

14.9%

(2.1)%

European part of Russia

77.02

77.71

(0.9)%

71.64

73.88

62.74

(3.0)%

17.8%

Total

49.59

51.93

(4.5)%

50.00

42.45

33.36

17.8%

27.2%

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011 revenues from gas sales were US$ 122 million, insignificantly higher than in the third quarter of 2011. A 5.6% increase in sales volumes was balanced out by average price decline of 4.5%. Sales volumes increase was due to seasonal increase in demand.

 

Revenue growth from gas sales of 17.1% in 2011 in comparison with 2010was driven by an increase in average prices of 17.8% (positive impact on revenues of US$ 74 million) and was partially offset by sales volumes decrease of 0.6% (negative impact on revenues of US$ 3 million).

 

In 2010 revenues from gas sales increased by 17.5% and amounted to US$ 416 million comparison to 2009, which was driven by increase in average prices of 27.2% (favourable impact on revenues of US$ 89 million). Sales volumes decrease of 7.6% led to revenue reduction of US$ 27 million.  

 

Support Services and Other Revenues

Rosneft owns service companies which render drilling, construction, repair and other services mainly to the companies within the Group. Revenues from services rendered to third parties are reported in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

 

The following table sets forth Rosneft's other revenues for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

change

 between

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

change for 12 months ended

December 31

December 31,

2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011-

2010

 2010-

2009

%

of total revenue

%

of total revenue

%

%

of total revenue

%

of total revenue

%

of total revenue

%

(US$ million, except %)

Drilling services

10

3.0%

13

3.6%

(23.1)%

40

2.6%

60

3.7%

25

2.0%

(33.3)%

140.0%

Sales of materials

67

20.1%

109

30.5%

(38.5)%

355

23.1%

341

21.0%

237

18.7%

4.1%

43.9%

Repairs and maintenance services

27

8.1%

28

7.8%

(3.6)%

108

7.0%

107

6.6%

104

8.2%

0.9%

2.9%

Rent services

22

6.6%

21

5.9%

4.8%

85

5.5%

68

4.2%

51

4.0%

25.0%

33.3%

Construction services

34

10.2%

23

6.4%

47.8%

96

6.2%

86

5.3%

63

5.0%

11.6%

36.5%

Transport services

61

18.3%

71

19.9%

(14.1)%

284

18.5%

325

20.1%

269

21.2%

(12.6)%

20.8%

Electric power sales and transmission

40

12.0%

33

9.2%

21.2%

301

19.6%

400

24.7%

273

21.5%

(24.8)%

46.5%

Other revenues

73

21.7%

59

16.7%

23.7%

269

17.5%

233

14.4%

248

19.4%

15.5%

(6.0)%

Total

334

100.0%

357

100.0%

(6.4)%

1,538

100.0%

1,620

100.0%

1,270

100.0%

(5.1)%

27.6%

 

Costs and Expenses

 

Production and Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses are split over operating segments in the table below:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31,2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -

2010

2010-

2009

(US$ million, except %)

Upstream

637

624

2.1%

2,445

2,208

1,869

10.7%

18.1%

Land restoration program

-

-

-

-

111

-

-

-

Downstream

783

1,036

(24.4)%

3,105

1,583

1,501

96.1%

5.5%

 Including procurement of additives and materials for Ruhr Oel GmbH

277

350

(20.9)%

868

-

-

-

-

Other

230

210

9.5%

990

890

654

11.2%

36.1%

Total

1,650

1,870

(11.8)%

6,540

4,792

4,024

36.5%

19.1%

 

Upstream production and operating expenses include materials and supplies, equipment maintenance and repair, wages and salaries, activities to enhance oil recovery, procurement of fuel and lubricants, electricity and other similar costs of Rosneft's consolidated exploration and production enterprises.

 

Upstream production and operating expenses in the fourth quarter of 2011increased to US$ 637 million or by 2.1% compared with the third quarter of 2011. The increase was due to the seasonal increase in technological transportation costs, seasonal increase in electricity and heat expenses, payment of annual bonuses to technical staff, increase in volumes of repair and maintenance provided by third parties, which was partially offset by the decrease in crude oil production and real rouble depreciation against the US$ by 6.3%.

 

In 2011 upstream production and operating expenses increased to US$ 2,445 million, or by 10.7% compared with 2010, when these expenses were US$ 2,208 million. The growth was due to the real RUB appreciation against the US$ by 12.1%, oil production increase by 2.2%, partially offset by cost-cutting initiatives.

 

In 2010 the Company adopted a special five-year land restoration program aimed at restoration of lands located in the territory of upstream activities of several subsidiaries of Rosneft and damaged before the acquisition of these subsidiaries by Rosneft. In accordance with the program Rosneft made a one-off accrual of land restoration expenses in the amount of US$ 111 million. This amount does not include expenses on land restoration spent by the Company as a part of regular production activity.

In 2010 upstream production and operating expenses increased to US$ 2,208 million, or by 18.1% compared with 2009. The growth was due to oil production increase by 7.0% and the real RUB appreciation against the US$ by 11.6%, partially offset by cost-cutting initiatives.

 

Upstream production and operating expenses per barrel are shown in the table below:

For 3 months

ended

% change

between

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 - 2010

2010 - 2009

(US$ per bbl and US$ per boe, except %)

Expenses per bbl of crude oil produced

3.16

3.09

2.3%

3.07

2.83

2.57

8.5%

10.1%

Expenses per boe of hydrocarbon produced

2.89

2.86

1.0%

2.82

2.61

2.34

8.0%

11.5%

 

Rosneft's downstream expenses decreased by 24.4% to US$ 783 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared with US$ 1,036 million in the third quarter of 2011. Excluding procurements of additives and other materials for refining process at Ruhr Oel GmbH, downstream operating expenses decreased by 26.2%. The decrease followed after predicting demand decline on petroleum products on domestic market and respective growth of intragroup petroleum products stock by 0.46 million tonnes. Closing of the river navigation period and change in FCA tanker shipments schedule also made its contribution in respective decrease indicated above.

 

These expenses increased by 96.1% in 2011 compared with 2010. The increase resulted primarily from procurements of additives and other materials for refining process at Ruhr Oel GmbH for the amount ofUS$ 868 million. Excluding this amount, downstream operating expenses increased by 41.3% due to increased volumes of retail revenue, increased expenses for additives for refining on own refineries and other factors.

 

In 2010 downstream operating expenses were US$ 1,583million, which is an increase of 5.5% compared with 2009 primarily due to the real RUB appreciation against the US$ of 11.6% and change in intragroup inventories.

 

The table below shows operating expenses at Rosneft's refineries:

For 3 months

ended

% change between

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -

2010

 2010-

2009

Operating expenses

(US$ million)

258

254

1.6%

914

738

685

23.8%

7.7%

Operating expenses per tonne of product output (US$/tonne)

20.69

20.89

(1.0)%

19.01

15.41

14.56

23.4%

5.8%

Operating expenses per tonne of crude oil throughput (US$/tonne)

19.62

19.83

(1.1)%

18.05

14.62

13.75

23.5%

6.3%

Operating expenses of Rosneft's refineries were US$ 258 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, which is an increase of 1.6% compared with US$ 254million in the third quarter of 2011. The increase was primarily due to increased volumes of crude oil throughput, increased volumes of materials and additives used in refining for production of EURO-class gasoline and seasonal increase in expenses for electricity.

 

In 2011 these expenses increased by 23.8% to US$ 914 million compared to US$ 738 million in 2010. The increase resulted from the real appreciation of the RUB against the US$ by 12.1%, increase in cost and volumes of materials and additives for production of EURO-class gasoline and higher electricity tariffs.

 

In 2010 refining operating expenses were US$ 738million, which is an increase of 7.7% compared with 2009. The increase resulted from the real appreciation of the RUB against the US$ by 11.6% and higher volumes of refinery throughput.

 

Operating expenses related to other activities increased to US$ 230 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, or by 9.5% compared with the third quarter of 2011. The increase was due to the increased volume of construction and other activities.

 

In 2011 these expenses increased to US$ 990million compared with US$ 890 million in 2010. The increase was due to real rouble appreciation compared to US$ by 12.1% and other factors.

In 2010 these expenses increased to US$ 890 million, or by 36.1% compared to 2009, primarily due to higher volumes of other activities accompanied by the increase in other revenues by 27.6% (particularly, from transportation services and electric power sales and transmission), and other factors.

 

Cost of Purchased Crude Oil, Gas and Petroleum Products

 

The following table shows Rosneft's crude oil, gas and petroleum product procurement costs and third-party refining costs:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December

31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -2010

2010-

2009

Cost of crude oil procured (US$ million)

2,884

2,320

24.3%

7,562

1,454

1,513

420.1%

(3.9)%

Volume of crude oil procured (million of barrels)

35.35

30.69

15.2%

104.13

51.75

57.61

101.2%

(10.2)%

Cost of gas procured (US$ million)

10

8

25.0%

33

26

29

26.9%

(10.3)%

Volume of gas procured (bcm)

0.19

0.15

26.7%

0.55

0.51

0.59

7.8%

(13.6)%

Cost of petroleum product procured (US$ million) (1)

416

599

(30.6)%

2,087

906

348

130.4%

160.3%

Volume of petroleum product procured (million of tonnes)

0.48

0.63

(23.8)%

2.44

1.55

0.71

57.4%

118.3%

Cost of refining of crude oil under processing agreements (US$ million)

127

135

(5.9)%

376

-

-

-

-

Volumes of crude oil refined under processing agreements (million of tonnes)

2.76

2.82

(2.1)%

7.21

-

-

-

-

Total cost of procured oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs (US$ millions)

3,437

3,062

12.2%

10,058

2,386

1,890

321.5%

26.2%

(1) In the fourth quarter and the twelve months of 2011 the average procurement price of petroleum products from third parties was higher than the average selling price of petroleum products due to differences in the mix of procured and sold petroleum products.

 

Rosneft purchases crude oil primarily from its affiliates to process it at own refineries. The structure of crude oil purchases is provided in the table below:

For 3 months

ended

% change between

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended 31 December

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -

2010

2010-

2009

(million bbl, except %)

International market

20.29

16.21

25.2%

44.95

-

-

-

-

Tomskneft

8.56

8.95

(4.4)%

39.71

37.22

33.46

6.7%

11.2%

Udmurtneft

2.79

2.73

2.2%

9.08

10.08

12.90

(9.9)%

(21.9)%

Surgutneftegaz

-

-

-

-

-

5.94

-

(100.0)%

Others

3.71

2.80

32.5%

10.39

4.45

5.31

133.5%

(16.2)%

Total

35.35

30.69

15.2%

104.13

51.75

57.61

101.2%

(10.2)%

Rosneft procures crude oil on the international market to supply it to Ruhr Oel GmbH.

 

Rosneft performs oil swap operations in order to optimize transportation costs of deliveries to refineries. Revenues and costs related to these operations are shown on a net basis in the "Pipeline tariffs and Transportation costs" line of the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. In the fourth quarter of 2011 these transactions were exercised with Gazpromneft, Bashneft, TNK-BP, Uralskaya NK and others. 

 

The volume of crude oil swaps amounted to 22.21 million barrels in the fourth quarter of 2011compared to 20.01 million barrels in the third quarter of 2010. The volume of crude oil swaps were 65.75 million barrels in the twelve months of 2011, compared to 38.49 million barrels in 2010 and 41.33 million barrels in 2009. Rosneft's estimated benefits from these transactions were US$ 21 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 and US$ 87 million in 2011.

 

Petroleum products from third parties are purchased primarily to satisfy current needs of Rosneft's retail subsidiaries. Procurement of petroleum products is exposed to seasonal fluctuations of volumes and mix. Procurement prices may significantly vary depending on regional markets.

 

 The tables below set forth Rosneft's costs, volumes and average prices per tonne of petroleum products procured from third parties in the fourth and third quarters of 2011:

For 3 months ended

%

change

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

US$

million

million of tonnes

average price US$/tonne

US$

million

million of tonnes

average price US$/tonne

US$

million

million

of tonnes

average price US$/tonne

High octane gasoline

347

0.38

906.09

536

0.54

998.97

(35.3)%

(29.6)%

(9.3)%

Low octane gasoline

1

0.00

708.19

7

0.01

723.33

(85.7)%

(100.0)%

(2.1)%

Diesel

36

0.05

742.11

40

0.06

681.83

(10.0)%

(16.7)%

8.8%

Fuel oil

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Jet fuel

1

0.00

602.04

-

-

-

-

-

-

Other

31

0.05

661.02

16

0.02

722.88

93.8%

150.0%

(8.6)%

Total

416

0.48

866.67

599

0.63

950.79

(30.6)%

(23.8)%

(8.8)%

 

The decrease in volumes of petroleum product purchases in the fourth quarter of 2011 was due to a seasonal decrease in demand for petroleum products and increased supplies from own refineries.

 

The tables below set forth Rosneft's costs, volumes and average prices per tonne of petroleum products procured from third parties in 2011, 2010and 2009:

For 12 months ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31,

 2011 and 2010

% change for 12 months ended December 31,

2010 and 2009

2011

2010

2009

US$ million

million

of

tonnes

US$/

tonne

US$ million

million of

 tonnes

US$/

tonne

US$ million

million of

tonnes

US$/

tonne

US$ million

million

of

tonnes

US$/

tonne

US$

million

million

of

tonnes

US$/

tonne

High octane gasoline

1,681

1.85

909.94

482

0.69

701.38

151

0.25

615.14

248.8%

168.1%

29.7%

219.2%

176.0%

14.0%

Low octane gasoline

41

0.06

672.45

43

0.07

579.82

21

0.04

533.65

(4.7)%

(14.3)%

16.0%

104.8%

75.0%

8.7%

Diesel

292

0.42

695.31

325

0.66

492.33

129

0.29

432.00

(10.2)%

(36.4)%

41.2%

151.9%

127.6%

14.0%

Fuel oil

-

-

-

2

0.01

302.17

17

0.05

342.60

-

-

-

(88.2)%

(80.0)%

(11.8)%

Jet fuel

1

0.00

602.04

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Other

72

0.11

651.10

54

0.12

450.12

30

0.08

385.06

33.3%

(8.3)%

44.7%

80.0%

50.0%

16.9%

Total

2,087

2.44

855.33

906

1.55

584.52

348

0.71

490.14

130.4%

57.4%

46.4%

160.3%

118.3%

19.3%

 

Average petroleum product procurement prices may deviate from average sales prices mainly due to different mix of regions where procurement and sales are effected and different product quality.

 

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses include wages and salaries and social benefits (except for wages of technical staff of production and refining entities), banking commissions, third-party fees for professional services, insurance expenses (except for insurance of oil and gas production and refining entities), lease expenses with respect to non‑core property, maintenance of social infrastructure, expenses to establish allowances for doubtful accounts and other general expenses.

 

General and administrative expenses in the fourth quarter of 2011were US$ 490 million, 0.6% higher than in the third quarter of 2011. In 2011 general and administrative expenses increased from US$ 1,584 million to US$ 1,785 million. Major factors affecting general and administrative expenses upturn are related to increase in audit, consulting fees and advertising expenses.

 

Pipeline Tariffs and Transportation Costs

Transportation costs are costs incurred by Rosneft to transport crude oil for refining and to end customers, and to deliver petroleum products from refineries to end customers (these may include pipeline tariffs and any additional railroad transportation costs, handling costs, port fees, sea freight and other costs).

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011 Rosneft's transportation costs remained practically unchanged and accounted for US$ 1,751 million compared with US$ 1,740 million in the third quarter of 2011. This was mainly due to the nominal RUB depreciation against US$ by 7.0%, which was mitigated by indexation of transportation tariffs in November 2011 and decline in volumes of sales under the FCA terms.

 

During 2011 Rosneft's transportation costs increased to US$ 7,329 million, or by 5.0% compared with 2010. The increase resulted from indexation of transportation tariffs, increased volumes of crude oil transportation from Vankor to China and start of crude oil supplies to Ruhr Oel GmbH, which was partially compensated by replacement of railroad deliveries of crude oil to China for pipeline transportation.

 

In 2010 Rosneft's transportation costs increased to US$ 6,980 million, or by 28.9% compared with 2009. The increase resulted from higher transportation volumes due to increase in crude oil production at the Vankor field and increase in tariffs of natural monopolies by 13.2% - 27.4% in US$ terms.

 

The table below sets forth costs per tonne of crude oil and petroleum products transported by pipeline, railway and a combination of pipeline and railway:

For 3 months ended

%

change

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, mln. US$

Cost per tonne sold, US$/t

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, mln. US$

Cost per tonne sold, US$/t

Volume

Cost

Cost per tonne sold

CRUDE OIL

International sales

Pipeline

15.78

97.3%

787

49.87

15.82

97.2%

821

51.90

 (0.3)%

(4.1)%

(3.9)%

Railroad and mixed

0.44

2.7%

11

25.00

0.45

2.8%

12

26.67

 (2.2)%

(8.3)%

(6.3)%

Transportation to refineries

Pipeline (1)

11.12

190

17.09

11.72

171

14.59

(5.1)%

11.1%

17.1%

Railroad and mixed

1.66

187

112.65

1.17

161

137.61

41.9%

16.1%

(18.1)%

PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

International sales

Pipeline(2)

0.07

0.8%

5

71.43

0.08

0.9%

6

75.00

(12.5)%

(16.7)%

(4.8)%

Railroad and mixed

7.66

84.4%

427

55.74

6.44

71.6%

351

54.50

18.9%

21.7%

2.3%

Other transportation expenses (3)

144

218

(33.9)%

Total

36.73

1,751

47.66

35.68

1,740

48.77

3.0%

0.6%

(2.3)%

(1) Including crude oil purchased on international market, which was directed to Ruhr Oel GmbH.

 

(2) Rosneft exported 1.35 million tonnes (14.8% of total export volumes) and 2.47 million tonnes (27.5% of total export volumes) of petroleum products in the fourth quarter of 2011 and in the third quarter of 2011, respectively, through its own pipeline in the town of Tuapse, and under FCA conditions from Samara refineries, where Rosneft does not bear transportation expenses directly. Trans-shipment expenses for supplies in the town of Tuapse comprised US$ 9 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 and US$ 9 million in the third quarter of 2011 and included to other transportation expenses.

 

(3) Other transportation expenses include cost of railroad and mixed transportation of petroleum products from refineries to tank farms and road transportation from tank farms to service stations as well as other transportation expenses. Other transportation expenses also include Rosneft expenses on crude oil swap deals net of effect from different prices.

 

The decrease in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 3.9%, which was due to decrease in tariffs by up to 5.1% in US$, partially offset by indexation of Transneft's tariffs.

 

The decrease in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 6.3%, which was mainly due to decrease in tariffs in US$ terms.

 

The increase in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries was 17.1% quarter-on-quarter, which was primarily due to change in logistics of supplies of crude oil to Rosneft's refineries. Particularly, crude oil from Tomskneft replaced delivery from Yugansk to Komsomolsk refinery. On the other hand delivery of crude oil from Yugansk replaced the respective volumes from Tomskneft to Achinsk refinery. This led to an increase in pipeline transportation expenses due to longer route from Yugansk to Achinsk refinery.

 

Simultaneously this resulted in respective mixed transportation expenses decrease due to shorter route from Tomskneft to Komsomolsk refinery.

 

The decrease in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of domestic supplies was 18.1%, which was primarily due to a decrease in transportation tariffs in US$ terms by 6.5% due to nominal RUB depreciation compared to US$ by 6.3% and change in logistics of supplies of crude oil from Yugansk and Tomskneft to Rosneft's refineries. Increase in transportation volumes was due to completion of regular turnarounds at Komsomolsk refinery. This fact led to additional increase in transportation cost per tonne as costs of supplies to Komsomolsk refinery are above the average for the Company.

 

 Pipeline transportation cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales decreased by 4.8%. The decrease was due to decrease in transportation tariffs in US$ terms.

 

Railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales increased by 2.3%. The increase was due to seasonal change in the structure of the transportation routes after closing of river navigation period.

 

The table below sets forth costs per tonne of crude oil and petroleum products transported by pipeline, railway and a combination of pipeline and railway:

 

For 12 months ended December 31

 

%

change between

the twelve months ended December 31,2011 and 2010

%

change between

the twelve months ended December 31,2010 and 2009

2011

2010

2009

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, mln US$

Cost per tonne

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost,

mln US$

Cost per tonne

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost,mln US$

Cost per tonne

Volume, mln. tonnes

Cost,

mln

US$

Cost per tonne

Volume, mln. tonnes

Cost,

mln

US$

Cost per tonne

CRUDE OIL

International sales

Pipeline

61.54

96.3%

3,148

51.15

47.44

78.0%

2,016

42.50

41.54

73.8%

1,355

32.62

29.7%

56.2%

20.4%

14.2%

48.8%

30.3%

Railroad and mixed

2.37

3.7%

87

36.71

13.39

22.0%

1,043

77.89

14.77

26.2%

961

65.06

(82.3)%

(91.7)%

(52.9)%

(9.3)%

8.5%

19.7%

Transportation to refineries

Pipeline (1)

42.03

824

19.61

37.82

738

19.51

36.93

541

14.65

11.1%

11.7%

0.5%

2.4%

36.4%

33.2%

Railroad and mixed

6.16

805

130.68

6.55

777

118.63

6.95

639

91.94

(6.0)%

3.6%

10.2%

(5.8)%

21.6%

29.0%

PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

International sales

Pipeline(2)

0.64

1.9%

48

75.00

1.10

4.2%

75

68.18

0.85

3.1%

49

57.65

(41.8)%

(36.0)%

10.0%

29.4%

53.1%

18.3%

Railroad and mixed

25.47

77.2%

1,689

66.31

18.01

68.1%

1,520

84.40

18.98

68.3%

1,370

72.18

41.4%

11.1%

(21.4)%

(5.1)%

10.9%

16.9%

Other transportation expenses (3)

728

811

499

(10.2)%

62.5%

Total

138.21

7,329

53.02

124.31

6,980

56.15

120.02

5,414

45.11

11.2%

5.0%

(5.6)%

3.6%

28.9%

24.5%

(1)  Including crude oil purchased on international market, which was directed to Ruhr Oel GmbH.

(2) Rosneft exported 6.90 million tonnes (20.9% of total export volumes), 7.33 million tonnes (27.7% of total export volumes) and 7.96 million tonnes (28.6% of total export volumes) of petroleum products in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, through its own pipeline in the town of Tuapse, and under FCA conditions from Samara refineries, where Rosneft does not bear transportation expenses directly. Trans-shipment expenses for supplies in the town of Tuapse comprised US$ 35 million in 2011, US$ 35 million in 2010 and US$ 39 million in 2009 and included to other transportation expenses.

 (3) Other transportation expenses include cost of railroad and mixed transportation of petroleum products from refineries to tank farms and road transportation from tank farms to service stations as well as other transportation expenses. Other transportation expenses also include Rosneft expenses on crude oil swap deals net of effect from different prices.

 

Construction of Skovorodino - Daquing pipeline (branch of ESPO pipeline) was completed in the end of 2010. Rosneft replaced railroad deliveries of crude oil to China by pipeline supplies, which changed the structure of the transportation routes and allowed the Company to benefit from economies on transportation expenses.

 

The increase in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 20.4% in 2011, which was due to an increase in tariffs by 15.1% - 19.7% in US$ terms and the change in transportation routes used (particularly, start of deliveries of Vankor and Yugansk crude oil to China via ESPO).

 

The increase in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of export sales was 30.3% in 2010, which was due to an increase in tariffs by 24.2% - 25.6% in US$ terms and the change in transportation routes used (particularly, start of deliveries of Vankor crude oil to exports through ESPO).

 

The decrease in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 52.9% in 2011, which was due to the cease of supplies of crude oil to China by mixed transport. 

 

The increase in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of export sales was 19.7% in 2010, which was due to tariffs growth in US$ terms.

 

The increase in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries was 0.5% in 2011, which was primarily due an increase in transportation tariffs by 14.7% - 15.7% in US$ terms, which was primarily offset by the start of crude oil supplies to Ruhr Oel GmbH, where transportation costs are low due to short transportation distances in Europe.

 

The increase in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of domestic supplies was 33.2% in 2010 compared with 2009, which was due to tariffs growth by 23.6% - 27.4% in US$ terms and change in crude oil supplies structure.

 

The increase in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of domestic supplies was 10.2% in 2011, which was primarily due to an increase in transportation tariffs in US$ terms by 12.5%, which was partially offset by the change in structure of transportation routes.

 

The increase in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of domestic supplies was 29.0% in 2010, which was primarily due to an increase in transportation tariffs in US$ terms.

In 2011 the increase in pipeline cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales was 10.0%, which was due to increase in tariffs by 8.7% - 11.9% in US$ terms.

 

In 2011 the decrease in cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales via railroad and mixed transportation was equal to 21.4%. The decrease was due to start of petroleum products sales on the local market of Germany, where transportation costs are low due to shorter transportation routes.

 

In 2010 the increase in petroleum product pipeline cost per tonne of petroleum product export sales and railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of petroleum product export sales was 18.3% and 16.9%, respectively, which was due to increase in tariffs by 13.2% - 18.0% in US$ terms.

 

Exploration Expenses

Exploration expenses mainly relate to exploratory drilling, seismic and other geological and geophysical works. Exploratory drilling costs are generally capitalised if commercial reserves of crude oil and gas are discovered, or expensed in the current period in the event of unsuccessful exploration results.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011 exploration expenses increased to US$ 220 million compared with US$ 60 million in the third quarter of 2011. The increase was due to dry exploratory wells write-off of in Eastern and Western Siberia for total amount of US$ 106 million, increased expenses on geophysical and seismic works and other exploration works not associated with dry wells write-off..

 

In 2011 exploration expenses increased by 2.1% compared with 2010. The change in exploration expenses was due to increase in writing-off dry wells and increase in volumes of other exploratory works.

 

In 2010 exploration expenses increased by 35.1% compared with 2009. The change in exploration expenses was due to increase in volumes of exploratory works at Samaraneftegaz fields, Kurmangazy project, geophysical surveys at Krasnodarneftegaz, Yuganskneftegaz, Vankor region.

 

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortisation

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation include depreciation of crude oil and gas producing assets, and other production and corporate assets.

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation were US$ 1,619 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared to US$ 1,549 million in the third quarter of 2011. The increase in the depreciation resulted mainly from the putting of new fixed assets into operation followed by increase in crude oil production volumes.

 

In 2011 depreciation, depletion and amortisation was US$ 5,996 million compared with US$ 5,597 million in 2010, which is an increase of 7.1%.

 

Taxes Other than Income Tax

Taxes other than income tax include the mineral extraction tax, the excise tax, the property tax and other taxes. The basis for calculation of mineral extraction tax is described under "-Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Results of Operations-Taxation-Mineral Extraction Tax and Export Customs Duty" above.

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth Rosneft's taxes other than income tax (excluding export duties) for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

%change between

  3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

%

change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -2010

 2010-2009

(US$ million, except %)

Mineral extraction tax

3,865

3,794

1.9%

14,022

9,051

6502

54.9%

39.2%

Excise tax

438

521

(15.9)%

1,873

1,105

893

69.5%

23.7%

Social security tax

98

132

(25.8)%

568

397

361

43.1%

10.0%

Property tax

98

91

7.7%

390

284

236

37.3%

20.3%

Land tax

7

7

-

28

22

16

27.3%

37.5%

Transportation tax

1

1

-

4

5

4

(20.0)%

25.0%

Interest and penalties and other payments

6

8

(25.0)%

26

56

49

(53.6)%

14.3%

Total taxes other than income tax

4,513

4,554

(0.9)%

16,911

10,920

8,061

54.9%

35.5%

 

Taxes other than income tax decreased by 0.9% to US$ 4,513 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, compared with US$ 4,554 million in the third quarter of 2011, ma inly due to the decrease in the excise tax by 15.9% due to decrease in share of petroleum products subject to excises taxes in total volume of petroleum product sales, as well as from decrease in social security expenses due to new social taxation system.

 

Taxes other than income tax increased by 54.9% to US$ 16,911 million 2011 in comparison with 2010. The increase in taxes resulted mainly from an increase in mineral extraction tax rate by 49.8% due to increase in crude oil price.

 

Taxes other than income tax increased by 35.5% to US$ 10,920 million 2010 in comparison with US$ 8,061 million in 2009. The increase in taxes resulted mainly from an increase in mineral extraction tax rate by 39.7% and from the rouble appreciation.

 

The following table sets the actual mineral extraction tax rates per barrel and per barrel of oil equivalent produced for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

% change between

  3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

%

change for 12 months

ended December 31

December31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -2010

 2010-

2009

(US$ million, except %)

Average enacted mineral extraction tax rate

20.65

21.40

(3.5)%

20.73

13.84

9.91

49.8%

39.7%

Actual mineral extraction tax expense per barrel of crude oil produced

19.18

18.77

2.2%

17.62

11.62

8.93

51.6%

30.1%

Actual mineral extraction tax expense per barrel of oil equivalent produced

17.51

17.36

0.9%

16.18

10.68

8.15

51.5%

31.0%

 

The actual mineral extraction tax rate is lower than enacted tax rate for the period, primarily, due to the reduced rates for crude oil produced at fields with reserve depletion of over 80% and the zero rate for crude oil produced at the Vankor field, which was applied until accumulated production at the field reached 25 million tonnes in August, 2011.

 

Export Customs Duty

 

Export customs duties include crude oil and petroleum product export customs duties. The export customs duties are also discussed above under "-Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Results of Operations-Taxation-Mineral Extraction Tax and Export Customs Duty".

 

 

  The following table sets forth Rosneft's export customs duties for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

% change between

  3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011-

2010

 2010-2009

(US$ million, except %)

Export customs duty for crude oil

5,357

6,068

(11.7)%

20,847

13,031

9,441

60.0%

38.0%

Export customs duty for petroleum products

1,779

1,503

18.4%

6,034

3,712

2,690

62.6%

38.0%

Total export customs duties

7,136

7,571

(5.7)%

26,881

16,743

12,131

60.6%

38.0%

 

The following table sets forth certain information about the export customs duty:

For 3 months

ended

% change between 3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -2010

 2010-2009

(US$ per barrel, except %)

Average Urals price

108.63

111.50

(2.6)%

109.07

78.25

61.01

39.4%

28.3%

Average enacted export customs duty

55.18

60.49

(8.8)%

55.90

37.40

24.51

49.5%

52.6%

Hypothetical export customs duty calculated using the average Urals price for the period (i.e. without time lag)

54.18

60.23

(10.0)%

58.65

38.61

27.40

51.9%

40.9%

Actual average customs duty on exports subject to regular duty

55.37

60.42

(8.4)%

56.03

37.55

23.82

49.2%

57.6%

 

The actual average customs duty on exports subject to regular duty deviates from the enacted export customs duty due to different monthly export volumes. Starting from May 2011, export volumes from Vankor field are subject to regular customs duties.

 

Operating Income

 

As a result of the factors discussed above, operating income decreased by 16.1% to US 3,099 million, in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared with US$ 3,693 million in the third quarter of 2011. As a percentage of total revenues, operating income was 12.9% in the fourth quarter of 2011 and 15.0% in the third quarter of 2011. As a percentage of total revenues, operating income before taxes other than income tax and export customs duty was 61.6% in the fourth quarter of 2011 and 64.2% in the third quarter of 2011.

 

Operating income increased by 17.6% to US$ 15,880 million, in 2011 compared with US$ 13,499 million in 2010. As a percentage of total revenues, operating income was 17.3% in 2011 and 21.4% in 2010. As a percentage of total revenues, operating income before taxes other than income tax and export customs duty was 64.9% and 65.3% in 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

Other (Expenses)/Income, Net

 

Interest Income

In the fourth quarter of 2011 interest income amounted to US$ 152 million in comparison with US$ 155 million in the third quarter of 2011.

Interest income increased to US$ 658 million in 2011 or by 20.3% compared with 2010. The increase was due to increase in the funds placed on deposits in 2011 compared with 2010.

 

Interest Expense

In the fourth quarter of 2011, interest expense decreased by 71.6% to US$ 19 million compared with US$ 67 million in the third quarter of 2011, which was mainly due the increase in interest capitalized and income resulting from interests SWAP operations.

 

 

In 2011, interest expense decreased by 44.8% to US$ 320 million compared with US$ 580 million in 2011, which is related to the decrease in interest accrued under valid loan agreements followed after the decrease in total debt and slight increase in interest capitalized in comparison to the prior period. It was partially mitigated by the increase in interest SWAP loss.

 

Loss on Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment

From time to time, Rosneft disposes of property, plant and equipment. In the fourth quarter of 2011 and in the third quarter of 2011, Rosneft recorded a net loss of US$ 78 million and US$ 104 million on the disposal of property, plant and equipment, respectively.

 

In 2011, Rosneft recorded a net loss of US$ 230 million on the disposal of property, plant and equipment compared to US$ 156 million recorded in 2010. In 2009 Rosneft recorded a net loss of US$ 350 million.

 

Equity share in affiliates' profits/(losses)

The equity share in affiliates' losses amounted to US$ 192 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared with profits US$ 213 million in the third quarter of 2011. The decrease resulted from the reduction in profits incurred by certain Rosneft's affiliates.

 

The equity share in affiliates' profits amounted to US$ 577 million in 2011 compared with US$ 60 million in 2010.

 

Other (expenses)/income, net

Other expenses, net, consist mainly of social expenditures and of write-offs of trade and other payables and receivables.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011, other income, net, amounted to US$ 260 million, compared to net losses of US$ 120 million in the third quarter of 2011.

 

In 2011, other expenses, net, amounted to US$ 260 million and in 2010 other losses, net, amounted to US$ 120 million. In 2011 the loss was primarily attributed to one-off accrual in second quarter of expenses on agreements with regions and charity expenses.

 

Foreign Exchange Loss

Foreign exchange loss was US$ 207 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared withforeign exchange loss of US$ 358 million in the third quarter of 2011.

Foreign exchange loss was US$ 649 million in 2011 compared with foreign exchange gainUS$ 32 million in 2010.

 

Income Tax

 

The following table sets forth the Company's effective income tax rate under US GAAP for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2010

2009

Effective income tax rate for Rosneft under US GAAP

12%

18%

20%

20%

23%

 

Before the end of 2011 the Company historically does not pay taxes based on its consolidated income before taxes according to the Russian law. Income tax is calculated for each entity based on its profits in accordance with the Russian Tax Code.

 

 

 

To calculate the effective tax rate Rosneft follows the provisions of FASB ASC 740-270, Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for the reporting period is the best estimate of the annual tax rate based on the enacted tax rate (20%) adjusted for the estimated annual effect of permanent differences betweenUS GAAP and Russian Tax Accounting Standards. The estimated tax rate may significantly depends on exchange rate fluctuations and vary significantly during the year.

 

In accordance with changes in Russian tax code effective from January 2012 the Company will have the option to become the "consolidation taxpayer" under certain conditions. The assessment of advantages from applying the status of "consolidation tax payer" will be made by the Company in the nearest future.

 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was US$ 6 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared to US$ 40 million in the third quarter of 2011.

 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was US$ 137 million in 2011 compared to US$ 272 million in 2010. The change resulted primarily from the decrease of ownership ratio and net income of certain Rosneft's subsidiaries related to minorities. 

 

Net Income

 

As a result of the factors discussed above net income increased by 7.7% to US$ 2,992 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 from US$ 2,778 million in the third quarter of 2011. As a percentage of revenues, net income was 12.5% and 11.3% in the fourth quarter of 2011 and third quarter of 2011, respectively.

 

As a result of the factors discussed above net income increased by 19.7% to US$ 12,452 million in 2011 from US$ 10,400 million in 2010. As a percentage of revenues, net income was 13.5% and 16.5% in 2011 and 2010, respectively. In 2009 net income amounted to US$ 6,514 million.

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Cash Flows

 

The principal items of the statement of cash flows for the periods analysed are as follows:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

 4 and 3 quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

 

December 31,2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -

2010

 2010-2009

 

(US$ million)

times

(US$ million)

times

Net cash provided by operating activities

3,505

2,864

1,2

15,749

15,172

10,319

1,0

1.5

Net cash used in investing activities

(4,128)

(2,206)

1,9

(13,606)

(12,439)

(8,788)

1,1

1.4

Net cash used in financing activities

1,851

(1,440)

(988)

(558)

(877)

1,8

0.6

 

Operating Cash Flow

 

Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to US$ 3,505 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 as compared to US$ 2,864 million in the third quarter of 2011. The operating cash flow includes operations with trading securities as part of the Company's efforts to manage cash resources (net intflow of US$ 57 million in the fourth quarter 2011 and US$ 33 million in the third quarter of 2011). The adjusted net cash provided by the operating activity amounted to US$ 3,562 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 and US$ 2,897 million in the third of 2011. The decrease in the operating cash flow primarily resulted from the increase in working capital.

For 3 months ended

Change

For 12 months ended

Change

December 31,

2011

September 30,

2011

Times

December 31,

2011

December 31,

2010

Times

(US$ million)

(US$ million)

Net cash provided by Operating activity

3,505

2,864

1,2

15,749

15,172

1,0

Effect from operation with trading securities

57

33

1,7

89

(262)

Adjusted net cash provided by operating activity

3,562

2,897

1,2

15,838

14,910

1,1

 

Increase in working capital by US$ 768 million caused by the following factors:

·; Increase in the prepaid expense by US$ 1,057 million is related to prepayments of customs duties and transportation services, energy and other utilities for the first holiday weeks of January 2012;

·; Decrease in the tax payable by US$ 210 million (mainly income tax);

It was partially offset by the following factors:

·; Decrease in trade receivable by US$ 710 million was attributed to the proceeds under the export sales volumes took place in the previous quarter.

 

In 2011 net cash provided by the operating activity (adjusted for the result of the operations with trading securities of US$ 89 million) amounted to US$ 15,838 million. In 2010 net cash provided by the operating activity (adjusted for the result of the operations with trading securities of US$ 262 million) amounted to US$ 14,910 million. The increase in the operating cash flow compared with 2010 resulted from increase in the net income by 18.0%.

 

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was US$ 4,128 million in the fourth quarter of 2011compared to US$ 2,206million in the third quarter of 2011. The increase resulted mainly from the increase in capital expenditures and acquisition of additional share in subsidiaries and affiliates.

 

Net cash used in investing activities was US$ 13,606  million in 2011 compared to US$ 12,439 million in 2010. The increase resulted mainly from the increase in capital expenditures and acquisition of additional share in subsidiaries and affiliates

 

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was US$ 1,851 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared to US$ 1,440 million of net cash used in the financing activities in the third quarter of 2011.

 

The increase in cash used in financing activities is related to proceeds of US$ 2 billion long-term multicurrency loan from group of banks and US$ 0.5 billion facility procuring the purchase of equipment. .

 

Net cash used in financing activities amounted to US$ 988 million in 2011 in comparison to US$ 558 million in 2010.

 

Capital Expenditures

The table below sets forth Rosneft's capital expenditures and licence acquisition costs:

For 3 months

ended

% change between

4 and 3 quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2011

2010

2009

2011 -

2010

2010-

2009

(US$ million, except %)

Yuganskneftegaz

1,024

869

17.8%

3,267

2,500

2,252

30.7%

11.0%

Vankorneft

783

499

56.9%

2,913

2,122

2,531

37.3%

(16.2)%

Purneftegaz

195

141

38.3%

504

522

276

(3.4)%

89.1%

Severnaya Neft

80

43

86.0%

208

111

76

87.4%

46.1%

Samaraneftegaz

88

83

6.0%

295

217

156

35.9%

39.1%

Other1

297

269

10.4%

985

871

576

13.1%

51.2%

Total upstream segment

2,467

1,904

29.6%

8,172

6,343

5,867

28.8%

8.1%

The Company

8

1

700.0%

26

69

49

(62.3)%

40.8%

Tuapse refinery

615

506

21.5%

1,984

754

208

163.1%

262.5%

Komsomolsk refinery

38

76

(50.0)%

166

116

92

43.1%

26.1%

Angarsk refinery

116

32

262.5%

181

100

79

81.0%

26.6%

Achinsk refinery

75

35

114.3%

192

122

54

57.4%

125.9%

Syzran refinery

88

46

91.3%

162

111

77

45.9%

44.2%

Novokuibyshevsk refinery

114

25

356.0%

210

117

56

79.5%

108.9%

Kuibyshev refinery

52

55

(5.5)%

184

136

69

35.3%

97.1%

Marketing Business Units and others2

331

130

154.6%

822

576

409

42.7%

40.8%

Total downstream

1,437

906

58.6%

3,927

2,101

1,093

86.9%

92.2%

Other activities 3

267

119

124.4%

588

474

325

24.1%

45.8%

Subtotal capital expenditures

4,171

2,929

42.4%

12,687

8,918

7,285

42.3%

22.4%

Сhange in materials in capital expenditures

94

(161)

>100.0%

559

13

(33)

4,200.0%

>100.0%

Total capital expenditures

4,265

2,768

54.1%

13,246

8,931

7,252

48.3%

23.2%

Licence acquisition costs

53

60

(11.7)%

254

140

96

81.4%

45.8%

1 Including: Krasnodarneftegaz, Stavropolneftegaz, Sakhalin-1, Grozneftegaz, VSNK and Dagneftegaz.

2 Relating to companies providing processing and storage services.

3 Relating to other services companies.

 

Rosneft's total capital expenditures including material purchases increased by 54.1% toUS$ 4,265 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2011. The increase in capital expenditures resulted from planning, budgeting and seasonal factors. In 2011 Rosneft's total capital expenditures including material purchases increased by 48.3% to US$ 13,246 million compared with US$ 8,931 million in 2010.

 

Upstream capital expenditures in the fourth quarter of 2011 increased by 29.6% compared with the third quarter of 2011 and amounted to US$ 2,467 million. The increase was mainly due to the seasonal fluctuations of construction work on Vankor fields. In 2011 the upstream capital expenditures increased by 28.8% compared with 2010 and amounted to US$ 8,172 million. In 2010 the upstream capital expenditures amounted to US$ 6,343 million.

 

Downstream capital expenditures increased by US$ 531 million or by 58.6% compared with the third quarter of 2011. The increase in capital expenditures was mainly driven by continued program for capacity upgrade and expansion at the refineries, including modernization of the Tuapse, Angarsk and Novokuibyshevsk refineries.

 

In 2011 downstream expenditures increased by US$ 1,826 million or by 86.9% compared to 2010. The increase in downstream expenditures resulted from the works carried out as part of the project for primarily and secondary capacity upgrade and expansion at Tuapse refinery and upgrade of other refineries. In 2010 the capital expenditures amounted to US$ 2,101 million.

 

Capital expenditures for other activities increased by 124.4%, to US$ 267 million, in the fourth quarter of 2011, compared with US$ 119 million in the third quarter of 2011. The increase resulted from the planned acquisition of drilling, transportation and other equipment. In 2011 the capital expenditures for other activities were US$ 588 million compared to US$ 474 million in 2010.

 

Since the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company's subsidiaries have been purchasing construction materials and selling such materials to contractors that provide construction and drilling services at subsidiaries' fields. The net increase in unused construction materials included in capital expenditures was US$ 94 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared to net decrease of US$ 161 million in the third quarter of 2011. In 2011, 2010 and 2009 the net change in unused construction materials were US$ 559 million, US$ 13 million and US$ (33) million, respectively.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011 the licence acquisition costs refer to the acquisition of three licences for exploration at Zagranichny, Santalovsky and Fateevsky blocks in Samara region for US$ 26 million and licences for exploration in the sea of Okhotsk for US$ 27 million.

 

In the third quarter of 2011 the licence acquisition costs of US$ 60 million refer to the licence for exploration and extraction of hydrocarbon reserves in the sea of Okhotsk and at Padovsky block in Samara region.

 

Debt Obligations

Rosneft adjusted net debt increased to US$ 15,864 million as of December 31, 2011 compared to US$ 13,991 million as of September 30, 2011.

 

Rosneft's total loans and borrowings increased to US$ 23,291 million as of December 31, 2011 from US$ 21,452 million as of September 30, 2011. The increase resulted from drawing down of unsecured long term syndicated loan received from the group of foreign banks in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Long-term loans are generally secured by oil export contracts. As of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, 75.6% and 84.9% respectively, of Rosneft's borrowings were secured by crude oil export contracts (excluding export to the CIS). As of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, pledged oil exports constituted 20.1% and 20.2%, respectively, of the total crude oil export sales for the analysed period (excluding export to the CIS).

 

The саlculation of the net debt is disclosed in the following table:

As of the date

December 31, 2011

September 30,

2011

December 31, 2010

Short term debt

4,734

4,960

5,498

Long term debt

18,557

16,492

18,057

Total debt

23,291

21,452

23,555

Cash and cash equivalents

(5,172)

(3,969)

(4,154)

Short-term bank deposits

(275)

(139)

(1,321)

Structured deposits

(979)

(2,263)

(3,791)

Short term promissory notes and other short-term liquid instruments

(1,001)

(1,090)

(627)

Adjusted net debt

15,864

13,991

13,662

 

 

 

 

Key Financial Ratios 

 

Rosneft monitors and evaluates its activities on an ongoing basis. Key financial ratios for the periods indicated are set forth below:

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December

31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2011

2010

2009

 

EBITDA margin

19.8%

21.5%

23.9%

30.5%

29.0%

 

Adjusted net income margin

12.3%

11.2%

13.5%

16.6%

13.8%

 

Net debt to capital employed ratio

0.19

0.18

0.19

0.20

0.29

 

Net debt to annualised EBITDA

0.83

0.66

0.36

0.71

1.36

 

Current ratio

1.97

1.78

1.97

1.97

1.13

 

US$/bbl

 

EBITDA/bbl

23.59

26.14

27.67

24.65

18.63

 

Upstream capital expenditure/bbl

12.24

9.42

10.27

8.14

8.06

 

Upstream operating expenses/bbl

3.16

3.09

3.07

2.83

2.57

 

Adjusted free cash flow before interest/bbl

(3.75)

0.34

2.94

7.49

4.73

 

US$/boe

 

EBITDA/boe

21.53

24.18

25.42

22.66

17.00

 

Upstream capital expenditure/boe

11.18

8.71

9.43

7.48

7.35

 

Upstream operating expenses/boe

2.89

2.86

2.82

2.61

2.34

 

Adjusted free cash flow before interest/boe

(3.43)

0.32

2.70

6.89

4.32

 

 

The Company considers EBITDA/bbl, upstream operating expenses/bbl(boe) and the related indicators as important measures of its operating performance. In addition, these measures are frequently used by financial analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of oil and gas companies. These measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of the Company's operating results as reported under US GAAP.

 

All the 'per unit of production' indicators are calculated by dividing the total amount in US$ by the total production volume in bbl or boe and are not adjusted for the effect of changes in inventories.

 

The following tables set forth relevant numbers relating to these measures for and as of the periods indicated:

 

Upstream Measures

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December

31, 2011

September

30, 2011

2011

2010

2009

Upstream capital expenditures (US$ million)

2,467

1,904

8,172

6,343

5,867

Upstream operating expenses (US$ million)

637

624

2,445

2,208

1,869

Barrels of crude oil produced (million)

201.49

202.10

795.83

779.07

728.06

Barrels of oil equivalent produced (million)

220.73

218.51

866.37

847.51

797.83

 

Calculation of Adjusted Free Cash Flow

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December

31, 2011

September

30, 2011

2011

2010

2009

Net cash provided by operating activities

3,505

2,864

15,749

15,172

10,319

Capital expenditures

(4,265)

(2,768)

(13,246)

(8,931)

(7,252)

Free cash flow

(760)

96

2,503

6,241

3,067

Trading securities operations

57

33

89

(262)

472

License acquisition costs

(53)

(60)

(254)

(140)

(96)

Adjusted free cash

(756)

69

2,338

5,839

3,443

 

Calculation of EBITDA Margin

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December

31, 2011

September

30, 2011

2011

2010

2009

Operating income

3,099

3,693

15 ,880

13,499

9,128

Accretion expense

35

41

146

107

87

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation

1,619

1,549

5,996

5,597

4,350

EBITDA

4,753

5,283

22,022

19,203

13,565

Sales revenues

23,951

24,627

91,975

63,047

46,826

EBITDA margin

19.8%

21.5%

23.9%

30.5%

29.0%

 

Calculation of Adjusted Net Income Margin

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December

31, 2011

September

30, 2011

2011

2010

2009

Net income

2,992

2,778

12,452

10,400

6,514

Effect from the assets impairment and interests SWAP

(40)

(20)

(81)

42

(42)

Adjusted net income

2,952

2,758

12,371

10,442

6,472

Sales revenues

23,951

24,627

91,975

63,047

46,826

Adjusted net income margin

12.3%

11.2%

13.5%

16.6%

13.8%

 

Current ratio

For 12 months ended December 31

2011

2010

2009

(US$ million, except ratio)

Current assets

25,642

23,043

15,169

Current liabilities

12,993

11,693

13,443

Current ratio

1.97

1.97

1.13

 

Calculation of Capital Employed and Related Indicators

For 12 months ended December 31

2011

2010

2009

(US$ million)

Short‑term loans and current portion of long‑term debt

4,734

5,498

7,838

Long‑term debt

18,557

18,057

15,669

Cash and cash equivalents

(7,427)

(9,893)

(5,018)

Net debt(1)

15,864

13,662

18,489

Shareholders' equity

65,761

54,535

44,831

Minority interest in subsidiaries' earnings

1,041

969

706

Equity

66,802

55,504

45,537

Capital employed

82,666

69,166

64,026

Average equity, including minority interest(2)

61,153

50,521

42,568

Average capital employed(3)

75,916

66,596

62,454

 

(1) The net debt estimation is set presented in "Debt obligations" section.

(2) Average equity including minority interest is calculated as a simple average of the equity including minority interest at the start and end of the given period.

(3) Average capital employed is calculated as a simple average of the capital employed at the start and the end of the given period.

 

 

 Calculation of Return on Average Capital Employed (ROACE)

For 12 months ended December 31

2011

2010

2009

(US$ million, except %)

Operating income

15,880

13,499

9,128

Income tax expense

(3,117)

(2,644)

(2,000)

Return used for calculation of ROACE

12,763

10,855

7,128

Average capital employed

75,916

66,596

62,454

ROACE

16.8%

16.3%

11.4%

 

Calculation of Return on Average Equity (ROAE)

For 12 months ended December 31

2011

2010

2009

(US$ million, except %)

Adjusted net income

12,372

10,442

6,472

Average equity, including minority interest

61,153

50,521

42,568

ROAE, annualized where appropriate

20.2%

20.7%

15.2%

 

 

  

 

Main Risk Factors

 

 

Industry risks

 

Risks associated with prices for crude oil, gas and petroleum products

 

Description

 

The Company has limited means to control prices for its production, which depend mainly on world market conditions, and the balance of supply and demand in various Russian regions.

 

Decline of prices may lead to reduction in volumes of crude oil and gas, which the Company can produce profitably, and this may in turn lead to reduction in the volume of Rosneft reserves, which can be efficiently developed, and to lower economic efficiency of prospecting and exploration programs.

 

Minimization

 

Rosneft has sufficient opportunities for reallocating goods flows in case of significant price difference between domestic and international markets. The Company is also able to reduce capital and operating expenses quickly in order to meet its commitments in case of sharp decline in prices for crude oil, gas and petroleum products.

 

Risks associated with dependence on monopolistic providers of transportation services

 

Description

 

Rosneft depends on monopolistic providers for transportation of oil and oil products, and has no control over the infrastructure that they use and tariffs they set.

 

The Company works with the Russian crude oil pipeline monopoly, Transneft, the petroleum product pipeline monopoly, Transnefteprodukt, and with the rail monopoly, Russian Railways (RZhD). Any serious failure in operation of the Transneft pipeline system, restrictions on access to its capacities or tariff growth negatively affect Rosneft's operating results and financial position. Use of railway services exposes Rosneft to risks, such as potential failure of deliveries due to deterioration of railway infrastructure in Russia. Incompatibility of Russia's wide-gauge track with rail track in most foreign countries lead to additional expenses and logistical obstacles. Another substantial risk arises from high levels of traffic on rail routes to the Far East due to growth in exports of coal from Western Siberia and Krasnoyarsk Territory and to increase of crude oil transportation via the railway section of the Eastern Siberia - Pacific Ocean pipeline route.

 

Minimization

 

In order to minimize its dependence on monopolistic providers of transport services Rosneft delivers a part of its crude oil and petroleum product exports via its own sea terminals (Murmansk, De Kastri, Tuapse and Nakhodka).

 

Risks related to geographic and climatic conditions

 

Description

 

Rosneft operates in regions that have stable climates and are not generally subject to natural hazards and disasters. However, abnormally low temperatures during the winter in a number of northern regions may complicate operations of the Company's oil production enterprises. Exports via Black Sea terminals to Mediterranean ports may be restricted by throughput capacity of the Bosporus Strait and by weather conditions (storm winds) in the Black Sea during the autumn. Also, severe ice conditions may lead to closure of export terminals on the Baltic Sea and at De-Kastri during the winter.

Any extended hold-ups in functioning of export terminals may have adverse effect on operating results and financial position of the Company.

 

Minimization

 

Rosneft minimizes these risks by taking account of complex climate conditions when planning field construction. Ability to reallocate goods flows enables Rosneft to minimize a part of its logistics risks.

 

Risks associated with sale of produced gas

 

Description

 

Rosneft is exposed to several risks in connection with sales of the gas it produces. The Unified Gas Supply System ('UGSS') is owned and operated by OJSC Gazprom and transports practically all gas in Russia. Gazprom is the monopoly supplier of gas in Russia and defines terms of access to the UGSS for third parties. Domestic prices for gas are set by the Russian Government and they remain below international levels although growth of domestic prices is expected.

 

Minimization

 

The Company minimizes these risks by reaching agreements with Gazprom and by using conservative forecasts for gas price growth when taking decisions on implementation of gas projects.

 

Risks associated with factual amounts of reserves

 

Description

 

Estimates of the value and amount of economically recoverable crude oil and gas reserves, rates of production, net present value of future cash flows and the timing of development expenditures necessarily depend upon several variables and assumptions and are subjective. Further uncertainty attaches to estimates of reserves using the Russian classificatory system, since this system considers only geological factors and does not take account of the economic viability of reserve production

 

Prospecting drilling involves risks of additional unforeseen expenses due to complex geology, anomalous levels of formation pressure (either high or low), heterogeneity in geological formations, equipment breakdowns and accidents, unfavorable weather, the need to observe environmental law and prescriptions by Government agencies, and shortages or late delivery of drilling rigs and equipment.

 

Due to the above-mentioned factors the amount of the Company's proved reserves may decline due to causes that are beyond the Company's control, which may in turn lead to decline in production volumes with unfavorable impact on the Company's operating results and financial position.

 

Minimization

 

Rosneft is a world leader by amounts of oil reserves and has an enormous resource base, which minimizes risks associated with decline of oil production due to future revision of reserve amounts.

 

Competition risks

 

Description

 

The oil & gas industry is intensely competitive. Rosneft competes mainly with other leading Russian oil & gas companies in the following areas of business:

- purchase of exploration and production licenses at auctions held by Russian Government agencies;

- acquisition of other Russian companies;

- engaging the services of leading independent service companies;

- obtaining equipment for capital projects, which may be in short supply;

- employment of highly skilled and experienced staff;

- acquisition of existing retail enterprises and of land plots to develop new retail enterprises;

- acquisition of, or gaining access to, oil refining facilities.

 

Minimization

 

Rosneft is among industry leaders in Russia and globally, and has a considerable portfolio of new projects to maintain and strengthen its positions in the future, which substantially improves the Company's competitive position.

 

 

Country and regional risks

 

Risks associated with countries and regions of operation

 

Description

 

Rosneft has operations in all Federal Districts of the Russian Federation and outside the country. Rosneft is currently taking part in a large number of projects with a broad range of foreign partners, including partners from Northern, Latin and Central America. Implementation of projects in certain countries may be complicated by various risks associated with specifics of legal regulation, and with the political and investment climate in those countries.

 

Minimization

 

The Concept for Long-Term Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation up to 2020 defines sectors, which could be successfully developed in specific regions of the Russia Federation.

 

Risks of military conflicts, social unrest, strikes, and declaration of a state of emergency in regions where the Company has operations are negligible.

 

The Company carries out multilateral assessment of risks when taking decisions on participation in international projects and constantly monitors risks in countries where projects are being implemented with the Company's involvement.

 

 

Financial risks

 

Currency risk

 

Description

 

Most of Rosneft's gross revenue is generated from export of crude oil and petroleum products. Consequently, fluctuations in exchange rates of foreign currencies against the rouble influence the Company's business results, subjecting the Company to currency risk.

 

Minimization

 

The Company's currency risk is substantially reduced by existence of expenses that are denominated in foreign currency. Rosneft is a large borrower on international debt capital markets, and the bulk of its loans are denominated in US dollars. Current liabilities for servicing of these loans are also denominated in dollars. This revenue and liability structure acts as an in-built hedging mechanism, where factors compensate one another by acting in opposite directions. A balanced structure of claims and liabilities in foreign currency minimizes impact of currency risk on the Company's business results. The Company manages risk pertaining to the share of claims and liabilities, which are not balanced, by entering into forward agreements for sale of foreign currency.

 

 

 Interest rate risk

 

Description

 

As a major borrower, Rosneft is exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates. The Company's primary source of debt financing is international debt capital markets. The majority of its debt portfolio is represented by US dollar-denominated loans that bear interest at rates determined with reference to LIBOR and EURIBOR interbank loan rates. Accordingly, an increase in LIBOR/EURIBOR rates can lead to higher costs of debt servicing, which, in turn, may adversely affect the Company's solvency and liquidity.

 

Minimization

 

The Company has a balanced policy for use of internal and loan financing and has active ratings from Moody's (Ваа1), Fitch (BBB) and S&P (BВB-). Rosneft carries out transactions with derivative financial instruments in order to obtain a fixed rate of interest on a part of its loan portfolio. Growth of the Company's credit rating and that of the Russian Federation are important factors in reducing the cost of borrowing for the Company in the future, and also help to keep down the cost of hedging risks associated with changes of interest rates.

 

Inflation risk

 

Description

 

Change in the consumer price index has some impact on the Company's financial position. However, existing and forecast levels of inflation are far from critical for the Company and the oil & gas industry as a whole. A 'critical' level of inflation is one, which is triple the level forecasted by the Ministry of Economic Development for the current year.

 

Minimization

 

Rosneft is not taking any special measures to reduce this risk, viewing it as insignificant.

 

Risk associated with investment in projects with return above 10% a year

 

Description

 

Rosnefthas a target rate of return equal to 10% for investments in its core business, including acquisition of stakes in Russian and international companies, as well as investments in non-core business, and investments for management of surplus cash (over and above amounts needed for maintaining current liquidity). This is associated with a number of risks.

 

Minimization

 

The Company operates a risk management system, which includes clear corporate procedures for decision-making in respect of such investments. The Rosneft Investment Committee holds regular meetings to consider various investment projects. Decisions concerning investments in excess of USD 50 mln must be taken at the level of the Management Board and decisions on investment sums in excess of USD 500 mln are taken by the Board of Directors. The annual investment program is approved by the Board of Directors as part of the Company's business plan. Cash in trust management is mainly placed in roubles and US dollars in highly rated financial instruments of Russian and foreign issuers, which minimizes the level of risk across the portfolio. Instruments and issuers are approved by Rosneft in order to ensure control over levels of risk.

 

 

  

Legal risks

 

Risk associated with changes in currency regulation

 

Description

 

Rosneft is heavily involved in foreign economic activities. A part of the Company's assets and liabilities is denominated in foreign currency. So the Government mechanism of currency regulation has impact on Company business.

 

A number of statutory acts were passed in 2011 aimed at optimizing and simplifying currency control procedures.

 

Russian legislation concerning currency regulation and control was not subject to any substantial changes affecting the business of Rosneft during the reporting period.

 

Minimization

 

Rosneft constantly monitors changes in currency regulation and control, strictly adheres to established rules and carries out the law-guided recommendations of currency control authorities.

 

Risks associated with changes in tax legislation

 

Description

 

The main changes to tax law in the reporting year were as follows:

§ introduction of consolidated tax payer groups from 2012;

§ introduction of new rules for control over transfer price formation from 2012;

§ introduction of rules for taxation of members of an investment syndicate;

§ introduction of measures for tax support of territorial development zones in the Russian Federation;

§ changes to the method of application of mineral extraction tax rates in production of natural gas from all field types and also to tax deductions in production of dehydrated, desalted and stabilized crude oil at sub-surface license areas in Tatarstan or Bashkortostan;

§ clarification of a list of services in respect of exported goods for purposes of application of a zero rate of VAT and clarification of the method for confirming application of such a rate.

 

Minimization

 

The Company carries out careful analysis of draft legislation and laws that have been approved in the field of taxation in order to reduce risks associated with changes to tax law. Rosneft constantly monitors changes to tax legislation and assesses and forecasts the impact of such changes on its business, so that likelihood of risks arising in connection with amendments to legislation on tax and duties that have come into force is not significant. Some new measures can be assessed as positive, since they tend to reduce the tax burden on the Company, optimize tax administration and overcome omissions in tax legislation.

 

Tax legislation is a particularly changeable branch of law, where legal statutes are subject to frequent amendments, additions and clarifications. which may be substantial in nature, as shown by the information provided above concerning tax changes in 2011. Rosneft constantly monitors changes to tax legislation, so that likelihood of risks arising in connection with amendments to legislation on tax and duties that have come into force is not significant.

 

Risks associated with change in customs regulation and duties

 

Description

 

Rosneft is involved in foreign trade, and is therefore subject to several risks that arise from changes to legislation concerning Government regulation of foreign trade, and to customs legislation governing procedures for transportation of goods across the customs border, establishment and application of customs regimes, and the setting and levying of customs charges.

 

Customs regulation is carried out in accordance with international agreements of the Russian Federation in the area of customs issues, with the provisions of the Customs Code of the Customs Union, the Federal Law on Customs Regulation, the Customs Code of the Russian Federation, the Federal Law on the Customs Tariff and other federal laws and legal acts adopted in accordance with such laws in the sphere of Government regulation of foreign trade.

 

The Federal Law №311-FZ on Customs Regulation in the Russian Federation, (dated 27.11.2010) establishing the procedure and rules for customs regulation in the Russian Federation was passed and is in force for purposes of ensuring fulfilment by the Russian Federation of the international agreements which constitute the legal and contractual basis of the Customs Union as part of Eurasian Economic Community.

 

At the present time, in accordance with the Federal Law № 164-FZ on the Principles of Government Regulation of Foreign Trade Activity (dated 08.12.2003), crude oil can be exported without quantitative limitations or export licensing. Quantitative limitations on exports can only be introduced by decision of the Government of the Russian Federation in exceptional cases, which are set out in the aforementioned Federal Law.

 

Rosneft uses the services of professional organizations - customs brokers, acting in the Company's name and on its instructions - for documentation of customs operations, payment of customs duties and other actions connected with observance of the customs regime for export of crude oil and petroleum products. However, it should be noted that delegation of customs operations to customs brokers does not exempt Rosneft from potential risk of civil liability in case of violations of customs legislation. In order to avoid such eventualities Rosneft constantly works with and monitors actions by customs brokers.

 

The procedure for setting rates of export customs duties on crude oil (TN VED code 2709 00) and specific goods categories, produced from crude oil, as listed by the Russian Government, is described in clause 4 of Article 3 of the Federal Law № 5003-I on Customs Tariffs (dated 21.05.1993).

 

According to this procedure export duty rates on crude oil and petroleum products are based on the average price for Urals crude oil on international commodity markets (Mediterranean and Rotterdam) during the most recent monitoring period and come into force on the 1st day of the calendar month following the end of the monitoring period.

 

Export duties on crude oil set by the Russian Government in 2011 were as follows:

First quarter: USD 317.5 per tonne in January 2011; USD 346.6 per tonne in February 2011; USD 365.0 per tonne in March 2011;

Second quarter, USD 423.7 per tonne in April 2011; USD 353.7 per tonne in May 2011; USD 462.1 per tonne in June 2011;

Third quarter, USD 445.1 per tonne in July 2011; USD 438.2 per tonne in August 2011; USD 444.1 per tonne in September 2011;

Fourth quarter, USD 411.4 per tonne in October 2011; USD 393 per tonne in November 2011; USD 406.6 per tonne in December 2011.

 

Minimization

 

In the course of its business Rosneft carries out constant analysis and monitoring of changes to customs legislation and takes account of risks associated with new provisions. The Company also maintains efficient interaction with and control over the actions of customs brokers.

 

    

Risks associated with changes to antimonopoly legislation

 

Description

 

Rosneft has significant shares of wholesale markets in the Russian Federation for automotive gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel and fuel oil, so Company business in this sphere is subject to additional requirements intended to protect competition, entailing risks associated with changes to antimonopoly legislation. Antimonopoly legislation is carried out in accordance with Russian federal laws and legal acts associated with these laws. The principal law governing antimonopoly regulation is the Federal Law on Protection of Competition. At the end of 2011 substantial amendments were made to antimonopoly legislation, having impact on Company business. The amendments came into force in January 2012. Amendments which could have positive impact on Company business include: clarification of the concept of concerted actions and their decriminalization, which will minimize the number of antimonopoly actions initiated by territorial antimonopoly agencies in respect of Rosneft's sales companies; establishment of conditions in which a price cannot be recognized as monopolistically high; and differentiation of administrative liability for abuse of dominant position (Article 14.31 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation) depending on consequences of the abuse. Inclusion in the Administrative Code of a procedure for setting fines for violations described in Articles 14.31 and 14.32 of the Code and a list of circumstances that mitigate and aggravate responsibility can be seen as a negative amendment, since its application will substantially increase the level of fines for antimonopoly violations (by eight times on average).

 

Minimization

 

Rosneft constantly monitors both amendments to existing legislation and law drafts, which are in preparation, assessing the nature of any amendments and taking account of them in its business in order to minimize risks arising from changes in antimonopoly requirements. The Company takes all necessary measures in its business selling petroleum products on the domestic market to minimize the risks indicated above, constantly monitoring market price levels and making full use of market instruments when carrying out sales of petroleum products, and also implementing other recommendations of antimonopoly bodies which are intended to ensure that petroleum product pricing is economically justified.

 

Risks associated with changes in licensing requirements for the Company's core business or licensing of usage rights for goods, which are in limited supply (including natural resources).

 

Description

 

Changes were made in 2011 to legal regulation of sub-surface resource use, through amendments to Federal Law № 2395-I (21.02.1992) on Sub-surface Resources (hereinafter 'the Law on Sub-surface Resources'), which is the act of federal legislation regulating issues of sub-surface resource use (the main activity of Rosneft).

 

The amendments define the procedure for provision of usage rights at sub-surface areas of local importance. It is established that sub-surface areas of local importance are to be defined as areas containing commonly found sub-surface resources, and resources that can be used for construction and exploitation of underground facilities of local and regional importancewhich are not connected with mineral extraction. The list of commonly found sub-surfacesites is prepared and approved by regional executive authorities by agreement with the Russian Federal Agency on Subsoil Use (Rosnedra) or its territorial branches. The procedure for preparation, review, and consent to lists of sub-surface areas of local importance or refusal of consent to such lists is established by Rosnedra. The amendments also establish that decisions to hold competitions or auctions for usage rights at sub-surface areas of local importance, on the composition and working methods of competition or auction commissions, and also the procedure and terms for conduct of such competitions or auctions are defined by public authorities in the respective region. Further actions by the Company in this sphere will bebased on these amendments to legislationaimed at regulating the provision of sub-surface usage rights procedures.

 

Another alteration to legal regulation of sub-surface resource use during the reporting period was the coming into force of a provision that enables the boundaries of a sub-surface area, which has been provided for use, to be adjusted in return for a payment in order to ensure fully adequate geological study, rational use and protection of the sub-surface resources. The procedure for boundary adjustment and the size of the payment in such instances will be defined by a regulatory act of the Government of the Russian Federation.

 

Minimization

 

These amendments are expected to have positive impact for the Company and to enable more complete, in-depth and rational development of mineral resources.

 

Following the approval of the new legal acts, the Company is carrying out a systematic review of the boundaries of license areas in instances where there are grounds for boundary changes to be made.

 

Description

 

There were substantial changes during the reporting year to the legal regulation of licensing for certain types of activity due to the passing of Federal Law 99-FZ on Licensing of Certain Types of Activity. The most important changes are: shortening of the list of the types of activity, which are subject to licensing (from 105 to 49); unification of several types of activity, which previously required separate licenses; and a ruling that validity of new licenses will not be limited in time. These changes are intended to unify the regulation of licensing for various types of activity and the requirements which organizations must satisfy in order to obtain the respective licenses. The Company is obtaining required permit-documents in accordance with the provisions of the new legislation, which came into force on November 3, 2011.

 

Minimization

 

Legal risks associated with change in the requirements for licensing of Rosneft's main activity can only have negative consequences to a small extent, since the Company possesses all necessary funds and equipment, uses the provisions of current Russian law to guide the conduct of its business, implements requirements and carries out all necessary measures for compliance with standards of industrial safety as set out in Russian law concerning operation of particularly hazardous facilities and on HSE.

 

Description

 

With respect to legal regulation of land use and construction, rules were clarified in the reporting year for provision and confiscation of land plots that are required for conduct of works associated with sub-surface resource use, rules were specified for the division of land plots that are in government or municipal ownership, changes were made to the procedure for taking ownership of land plots by the owners of buildings and structures located on those land plots, the procedure for issue of construction permits was clarified, and the legal content of the concepts 'reconstruction' and 'major repairs' was specified, with separate specifications for transport and communications infrastructure facilities.

 

Further, the Federal Law № 41-FZ (20.03.2011) on Amendments to the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation and to Various Legal Acts concerning Territorial Planning extended validity of the regulation, by which land plots in government or municipal ownership can be made available and by which construction permits can be issued in the absence of rules for land use and construction. The Law also extended the validity of transition rulings, which regulate changes in the type of permitted use of land plots, transfer of land plots from various categories to the urban land category, and exclusion of land plots from urban land boundaries.

 

Minimization

 

The Company is obtaining ownership rights to land plots, including acquisition of land plots that were formerly in government and municipal ownership, and is obtaining permit-documents in compliance with current laws.

 

We believe that the changes, which are described, harmonize current practise for obtaining rights to land plots and permit-documents, and for obtaining permission from government bodies, and that they will simplify Company access to land plots, which it needs for the purposes of sub-surface use.

 

Description

 

Aspects of use, protection, conservation and replacement of protected forests and of protected areas of forests were specified in the reporting year. The changes, which have been made, facilitate access to forest areas, which is required for conduct of sub-surface geological studies and development of mineral fields in regions of Northern European Russia, and of Western and Eastern Siberia, where a lake-and-marsh landscape with numerous watercourses can occupy up to 85% of the territory of license areas, and also in regions where forest-tundra, forest-steppe and other environmentally valuable forest types are predominant (access is assured on the basis of licenses, which were issued before a prohibition on placement of facilities for sub-surface use in protected forests or protected areas of forests came into force, i.e. before 31.12.2010).

 

Also the Federal Law № 427-FZ (12.12.2011) on Amendments to Articles 2 and 3 of the Federal Law on the Entry into Force of the Land Code of the Russian Federation and Specific Legal Acts of the Russian Federation offers an extension until January 1, 2015, of the regulation which allows forest areas that are part of the forest fund to be put at the disposal of legal entities without the conduct of a state cadastral review (except in cases where forest areas are made available for purposes of recreation).

 

Minimization

 

Further actions by the Company for acquisition of prospective sub-surface area and of rights to forest areas will be guided by these changes.

 

Risks associated with inability to extend validity of licenses for particular types of business or for use of the objects of licensing, supply of which is limited (including natural resources)

 

Description

The licensing regime for geological study, exploration and production of oil & gas is regulated by Russian Federal Law № 2395-1 on Sub-surface Resources (on Minerals), dated February 21, 1992 with amendments and additions, and also by legal acts passed in accordance with that Law. Rosneft operates on the basis of numerous licenses for geological study, exploration and production of hydrocarbons.

 

Following acquisition of subsidiaries in October 2006 Rosneft became the holder of a larger number of licenses, although several of these licenses belong to Company subsidiaries and joint ventures.

Rosneft is also obliged to obtain and extend the validity of other licenses, permits, agreements, and rights to land use and approvals for development of its fields.

 

At present most of the Company's licenses for geological study expire in 2013-2015. Russian legislation allows amendments to prospecting licenses regarding extension of periods for geological study.

 

Most of the Company's licenses for production and combined licenses for exploration and production expire in 2017-2025. Existing legislation permits extension of the validity of exploration and production licenses from 20-25 years to complete field exhaustion. The Company therefore benefits from mutual dependence, underwritten by legislation, between a license and the relevant development project. This makes it possible to individualize the conditions of mineral use to suit specific field conditions, and also to tailor the conditions of mineral use as regards the period of license validity. The Company takes account of scheduled expiry of mineral-use rights, as specified in the license, and organizes work for license extension to match provisions of the field development project (up to field exhaustion).

 

Existing legislation on sub-surface resources includes grounds for earlier termination, suspension or restriction of mineral-use rights. If government bodies consider that Rosneft has failed to meet conditions of its licenses, permits or agreements, they may impose a fine, suspend or terminate the Company's mineral-use rights. In any case, administrative steps for early termination are only taken by Rosnedra and its territorial subdivisions at the end of a three-month period, during which the license holder can take steps to eliminate the relevant violations.

 

However, any suspension, restriction or termination of Rosneft's licenses could have adverse effect on the Company's business results and its financial position.

 

Minimization

 

Rosneft observes its license agreements, and also monitors them and keeps them up to date, so the Company views risks of early termination of its mineral-use rights as minimal.

 

Risks associated with current legal disputes, to which the Company is a party

 

Description

 

Rosneft has previously participated or is currently participating in the following court cases, which may have substantial impact on the Company's financial results:

 

1.) In 2006 the International Commercial Arbitrage Court of the Russian Chamber of Commerce upheld claims by Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. for recovery of debt from OJSC Yuganskneftegaz (the legal predecessor of OJSC Rosneft Oil Company) under four loan agreements. These court decisions are hereafter referred to as the 'Arbitrage Verdicts'. The sum to be recovered consisted of RUB 11,233.0 mln loan principal, RUB 1,702.9 mln accrued interest and USD 0.9 mln arbitrage fees and court costs. Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. made an application to the Court of Amsterdam (Netherlands) for the Arbitrage Verdicts to be upheld and implemented in the Netherlands. In May 2007 Rosneft successfully contested the Arbitrage Verdicts in the Moscow Arbitrage Court based on procedural violations in the earlier court case. This decision was upheld by appeal and supervisory courts in the Russian Federation. On February 28, 2008 the Amsterdam Court refused to uphold the Arbitrage Verdicts and order their execution in the Netherlands. On April 28, 2009 the Amsterdam Appeal Court overturned the ruling of the Amsterdam Court and ordered that the Arbitrage Verdicts should be executed in the Netherlands. The Company appealed to the Supreme Court of the Netherlands on April 28, 2009 for the ruling of the Amsterdam Appeal Court to be revised, but on June 25, 2010 the Supreme Court ruled that the appeal by the Company should not be heard.

 

In addition to the legal case in the Netherlands, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. made a further claim in 2009 and at the start of 2010 for the Arbitrage Verdicts to be upheld and implemented in the USA, and in England and Wales, Ireland, and Jersey, and also for awarding of interest on the sums referred to in the Arbitrage Verdicts. In accordance with a court order by the English court on April 6, 2010, the Company agreed to provide security agreed by the parties for purposes of the courts cases in England and the Netherlands, and the court cases in the USA, Ireland, and Jersey were terminated.

 

As stated above, on June 25, 2010 the Supreme Court of the Netherlands ruled that the appeal by the Company against the verdict of the Amsterdam Appeal Court from April 28, 2010 should not be heard. Although Rosneft disagrees with the rulings of the aforementioned Dutch courts, on August 11, 2010 it made a payment to Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. equivalent to the sum indicated in the Arbitrage Verdicts.

 

Apart from the above-mentioned payments, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. is maintaining its application to the High Court of Justice in London for payment of interest, calculated by reference to legal statutes, amounting to USD 160 mln at the time when the application was made. Rosneft will make every effort to defend its position in respect of the remaining claims in the ongoing legal proceedings in England. Hearings concerning certain preliminary matters as part of the above-mentioned court case were held in May 2011. On June 14, 2011 the London High Court delivered a provisional verdict on two preliminary matters, which it had agreed to consider before delivering a verdict on the substance of the claim. Although the Court found in favour of Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. in both instances, it allowed Rosneft to appeal against the decisions. On July 5, 2011 the Company gave notice that it will appeal and the argumentation of its appeal was submitted on July 19, 2011. Hearings in the English Appeal Court took place in March 2012. A schedule for hearing the substance of the case will be confirmed as soon as a verdict has been delivered on the Company's appeal. The Company intends to make every effort to defend its position in the remaining court proceedings in England.

 

2) In 2007 CJSC Vesta Investment Company, which is a shareholder of Rosneft, brought a claim in the Moscow Arbitrage Court for four loan agreements between the company Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. as lender and OJSC Yuganskneftegaz as borrower to be declared void (fictitious). Total amount of the borrowing under the terms of the disputed agreements is RUB 11.2 bln. Rosneft, as the legal successor of OJSC Yuganskneftegaz, is participating in the proceedings as co-defendant. Hearing of the case was temporarily interrupted, but the Moscow Arbitration Court has now resumed conduct of the case and hearings are scheduled for April 11, 2012.

 

3) In May 2007 a court in Amsterdam (the Netherlands) upheld an application by the company Glendale Group Limited for preventative arrest of RUB 3.5 bln in cash, which may be transferred to Rosneft as a result of court claims in the Netherlands. Glendale Group Limited justified the application by the existence of a RUB 3.5 bln debt on eight promissory notes issued by OJSC Yuganskneftegaz in 2003. Various process pleas relating to the claim were heard in 2008-2010, and on July 7, 2010 the Company presented its defense and a plea for hearings in the case to be terminated (rejected by the Amsterdam court on July 20, 2011). On August 31, 2011 Glendale Group Ltd. submitted objections to the defense by Rosneft, in response to which the Company submitted its explanations. Further objections by Glendale Group Ltd. to the defense by Rosneft are due to be presented by March 28, 2012. A decision by the Amsterdam court on the procedure for further hearings is currently being awaited.

 

Rosneft is also involved in a number of other courts cases, which arise in the course of its ordinary business and do not entail substantial financial risk for the Company.

 

Minimization

 

Rosneft regularly monitors verdicts delivered by higher courts and assesses trends in the interpretation of laws at the level of regional arbitration courts, making full use of its monitoring data both for the purposes of defending its rights and lawful interest in court and for regulation of issues that arise in the course of Company business. Risks associated with changes in court practice are therefore believed to be insignificant.

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Governance

 

System of Corporate Governance

 

An effective and transparent system of corporate governance is essential for the sustainable development of Rosneft, for enhancing the Company's social responsibility before all interested parties, and for raising the Company's appeal to investors. As a public company, Rosneft does all it can to improve the efficiency of its system of corporate governance, and monitors and makes use of the latest international experience.

 

The Company's main tasks in the sphere of corporate governance are as follows:

·; application, dissemination, monitoring and enforcement of efficient unified governance standards at all of the Group's structural divisions and subsidiaries;

·; constant improvement of relationships with shareholders and institutional investors, employees, business partners and other interested parties;

·; improvement of information policy and achievement of greater information transparency;

·; ensuring efficient long-term cooperation with local government to support socio-economic development in Russian regions.

 

Rosneft's system of corporate governance consists of the General Meeting of Shareholders, the Board of Directors, a Collegial Executive Body (the Management Board), and a Chief Executive Officer (the Company President). The principles and foundations of this system are formulated in Rosneft's Corporate Code of Conduct, which was designed to comply with the Russian Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies, with the Corporate Code of Conduct recommended by the Russian Federal Commission for the Securities Market, with OECD principles of corporate governance, and with the Company Charter.

 

The system of corporate governance is also regulated by the following internal documents:

·; Regulation on the Procedure for Formation and Operation of BoD Committees;

·; Regulation on the BoD Audit Committee;

·; Regulation on the BoD HR and Remuneration Committee;

·; Regulation on the BoD Strategic Planning Committee;

·; Corporate Code of Conduct;

·; Regulation on the Corporate Secretary;

·; Regulation on Dividend Policy;

·; Regulation on Insider Information;

·; Regulation on Information Policy;

·; Regulation on Internal Control of Operations and Finances;

·; Regulation on the Accounting Commission;

·; Code of Business Ethics;

·; Regulation on Provision of Information to Shareholders.

 

All of these documents are available on the Company website together with Rosneft's Charter. Information on compliance by Rosneft with the Code of Corporate Conduct is provided in an appendix to the present Annual Report. The Company's system of corporate governance is being constantly improved through amendments to the above-mentioned internal documents.

 

The General Meeting of Shareholders

 

The General Meeting of Shareholders is the Company's supreme governing body. The Company implements the Regulation on the General Meeting of Shareholders, which was approved in an amended version by the General Meeting of Shareholders on June 19, 2009 (unnumbered minutes, 29.06.2009).

 

The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to review Company results in 2010 was held on June 10,2011 in Krasnodar (unnumbered minutes, 16.06.2011). The meeting was attended by 97.39% of Company shareholders.

Individuals in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Krasnoyarsk, Samara and Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk who had the right to take part in the Meeting, could watch it via a live broadcast.

 

The Meeting approved the Company's Annual Report and financial accounts for 2010; distribution of Company income for 2010; the amount, schedule and form of payment of dividends for 2010; and remuneration and compensation of expenses for members of the Company Board of Directors. Decisions were also taken on election of members of the Board of Directors and of the Audit Commission, approval of the Company Auditor, making of amendments and additions to the Company Charter, and approval of related-party transactions. Decisions taken by General Meeting of Shareholders had been fully executed as of December 31, 2011.

 

The first meeting of the newly appointed Board of Directors was held at the end of the Shareholders' Meeting, and the Board appointed a Chairman and Deputy Chairmen. The Board also confirmed membership of its three committees, each of them headed by an independent director, and appointed new membership of the Management Board.

 

Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders

An Extraordinary General Meeting of Rosneft Shareholders was held in Moscow on September 13, 2011 (unnumbered minutes, 16.09.2011). Owners of 97.4% of Company shares participated in the Meeting.

Decisions were taken at the Meeting on early termination of the authorities of the Board of Directors. At the end of the Meeting the newly elected Board of Directors met to elect the Board Chairman and his deputies. The Board also confirmed the membership of its three committees, each of which was headed by an independent director.

 

The Board of Directors

 

The Board of Directors is the chief component of Rosneft's system of corporate governance. 

 

Activities by the Board of Directors are governed by current legislation, the Company's Charter provisions, and the Regulation on the Board of Directors, which was approved with amendments by the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft on June 19, 2009 (unnumbered minutes, dated 29.06.2009).

 

The Board of Directors carries out general management of Company business on behalf and in the interests of all its shareholders within the limits of its authority, as prescribed by Law and the Company 

Charter.

 

The Board of Directors also supervises the system of control over the activities of the Company's executive bodies, and ensures efficient interaction between Company bodies and observance and protection of the rights and lawful interests of shareholders.

 

In carrying out these functions the Board of Directors works closely with the Company auditor and management and structural subdivisions of the Company, and with Company officials. Work with these parties is carried out in part through the Committees of the Board of Directors.

 

The Board of Directors is governed in its decision-making by the following principles:

- that decisions should be taken based on accurate information about Company business;

- prevention of any limitations on the rights of shareholders, including the right to participate in management of Company affairs, and to receive dividends and information about the Company;

- achieving a balance between the interests of various groups of shareholders to ensure the greatest possible objectivity in decision-making for the benefit of all Company shareholders.

 

Rosneft aims to achieve maximum efficiency in the activities of the Board of Directors through high levels of qualification of its members, the personal responsibility of each member of the Board of Directors, and the responsibility of the Board of Directors as a whole for the decisions, which it makes, as well as by achieving an optimal balance between executive, non-executive and independent members of the Board.

 

Newly appointed members of the Board of Directors undergo an induction programme, in which they are familiarized with the Company's internal documents and decisions made by the General Meeting of Shareholders. Other information, which Board members may require for proper execution of their duties, is supplied to them on request.

 

The composition of the current Board of Directors corresponds to standards set out in Rosneft's Code of Corporate Conduct and to international corporate governance practices. As of December 31, 2011 eight of the nine directors were non-executives and four of them were independent.

 

Members of the Board of Directors of Rosneft (as of December 31, 2011)

From January 1,2011 until June 10, 2011 the functions of the Board of Directors were carried out by the members who were elected by the General Meeting of Shareholders on June 18, 2010. From June 10,2011 until September 13, 2011 the functions of the Board of Directors were carried out by the members who were elected by the General Meeting of Shareholders on June 10, 2011. From September 13,2011 the functions of the Board of Directors were carried out by the members who were elected by the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders on September 13, 2011.

 

Alexander Nekipelov

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, Member of the Strategic Planning Committee.

Born in 1951. Graduated from the Economics Faculty of Lomonosov Moscow State University in 1973, specializing in Political Economy. Doctor of Economic Science. Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Author of numerous published scientific articles. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 1998 to 2001 - Director of the Institute of International Economic and Political Studiesat the Russian Academy of Sciences.

From 2001 - Vice-President of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Presidium Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

From 2004 - Director of Moscow School of Economics at Lomonosov Moscow State University.

From 2006 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

From 2008 - Member of the Board of Directors of Transneft.

From 2008 - Member of the Board of Directors of Zarubezhneft.

From 2011 - Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Eduard Khudainatov

Chairman of the Management Board, President of Rosneft.

Born in 1960. Graduated in 1996 from the International Business Academy, specializing in Trade. Completed a second higher education in 2000 at Tyumen State University, specializing in Law. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 1993 to 1996 - Head of the companies Evikhon, Evikhon-2 and Yuganskpromfinco.

In 1996 - Deputy Head of the Administration of the town of Nefteyugansk, with responsibility for general issues.

From 1996 to 2000 - First Deputy Head of Nefteyugansk District, Head of Administration of the town of Poikovsky.

From 2000 to 2003 - Chief Federal Inspector for Nenets Autonomous District in the Office of the Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the North-Western Federal District.

From 2003 to 2008 - CEO of OJSC Severneftegazprom.

From 2008 - Vice-President of Rosneft.

From 2009 - First Vice-President of Rosneft.

From September 6, 2010 - President and Chairman of the Management Board of Rosneft. Member of the boards of directors and supervisory boards of several subsidiaries and equity affiliates of Rosneft.

From 2011 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Andrey Kostin

Independent Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the HR and Remuneration Committee, Member of the Audit Committee.

Born in 1956. Graduated with distinction from the Economics Faculty of Lomonosov Moscow State University in 1979, specializing in Political Economy. Doctoral Candidate of Economic Science. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 1993 to 1995 - Deputy Head of the Foreign Investments Department of Imperial Bank.

In 1995 - First Deputy Chairman of National Reserve Bank (NRB).

From 1996 to 2002 - Chairman of Vnesheconombank.

From 2002 - President and Chairman of the Management Board of VTB Bank. Member of the boards of directors and supervisory boards of several major Russian companies.

From 2006 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Hans-Joerg Rudloff

Independent Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the Audit Committee, Member of the HR andRemuneration Committee.

Born in 1940. Graduated from the Economics Faculty of Berne University in 1965.

From 1998 - Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Barclays Capital. Member of the management bodies of several major foreign companies.

From 2006 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Sergey Shishin

Independent Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee.

Born in 1963. Graduated in 1984 from the Higher Borderguard School of the Committee for State Security of the USSR, in 1990 from the Higher Institute of the Committee for State Security, and in 1999 from the Russian Civil Service Academy attached to the President of the Russian Federation. Doctor of Economic Science. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 1986 to 2000 - service in the armed forces of the USSR and the Russian Federation.

From 2001 to 2006 - worked at the Central Institute of Economics and Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

From 2007 - Senior Vice-President of VTB Bank.

From 2011 - Member of the Supervisory Board of VBRR.

From 2011- Member of the Board of Directors of Rushydro.

From 2011- Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Vladimir Bogdanov

Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

Born in 1951. Graduated in 1973 from the Tyumen Industrial Institute specializingin 'Drilling of oil & gas wells'. Obtained a second higher education in 1990 at the Economics Academy attached to the Council of Ministers of the USSR, specializing in 'Economics, management organization, and economic planning'. Doctor of Economic Science. Author of many published scientific works and articles and developer of technical innovations. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 1993 - Member of the Board of Directors, CEO of OJSC Surgutneftegaz.

From 2004 - Chairman of the Board of Directors of Surgutneftegazbank.

From 2009 - Member of the Board of Directors of Zarubezhneft.

From 2009 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Dmitry Shugaev

Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, Member of the Strategic Planning Committee.

Born in 1965. Graduated in 1987 from the Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the USSR Foreign Ministry. Doctoral Candidate in Economic Science.

From 1997 to 2001 - CEO of CJSC Yuridichesky Profil.

From 2001 to 2008 - various posts at State Unitary Enterprise, Rosoboronexport.

From 2008 to 2009 - Head of the CEO's Office at the State Corporation, Rostechnologies.

From 2009 - Deputy CEO of the State Corporation, Rostechnologies. Member of the boards of directors and supervisory boards of several major Russian companies.

From 2011 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Nikolay Tokarev

Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, Member of the Strategic Planning Committee.

Born in 1950. Graduated from Karaganda Polytechnical Institute, specializing in 'Electrification and Automation in the Mining Industry'. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 1999 to 2000 - Vice-President of Transneft.

From 2000 to 2007 - CEO of the State Foreign-economic Conglomerate, Zarubezhneft (incorporated in 2004 as OJSC Zarubezhneft).

From October 2007 - President of Transneft. Member of the boards of directors of several major Russian companies.

From 2009 - Member of the Board of Directors of OJSC Rosneft.

 

Matthias Warnig

Independent member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, Member of the Strategic Planning Committee, Member of the Audit Committee.

Born in 1955. Graduated in 1981 from the Bruno Leuschner Higher School of Economics, specializing in National Economics.

From 1990 to 2006 - employment at Dresdner Bank Group in Frankfurt, Saint Petersburg and Moscow as President, Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Chief Coordinator of Dresdner Bank Group AG in the Russian Federation.

From 2006 - Managing director of Nord-Stream AG (Switzerland). Member of the boards of directors and supervisory boards of several major Russian and foreign companies.

From 2007 - Member of the Supervisory Board of VTB Bank.

From 2011 - Chairman of the Board of Directors of Transneft.

From 2011 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Attendance of Board members at Board meetings and meetings of Board Committees in 2011

Board of Directors

Audit Committee

 

HR and Remuneration Committee

Strategic Planning Committee

Members

Executive

Non-executive

Independent

Attendance at meetings

Persons who were members of the Board of Directors during the whole of 2011

Vladimir Bogdanov

Х

32/33

Andrey Kostin

X

X

33/33

10/10

9/9

Alexander Nekipelov

X

X

33/33

7/7

5/5

Hans-Joerg Rudloff

X

X

33/33

10/10

9/9

Nikolay Tokarev

X

33/33

5/5

Persons who left the Board of Directors on June 10, 2011

Igor Sechin

Х

10/12

Andrey Reus

X

12/12

2/2

Sergey Bogdanchikov

X

0/12

Persons who joined the Board of Directors on June 10, 2011

Dmitry Shugaev

X

21/21

3/3

Sergey Shishin

X

X

21/21

3/3

Eduard Khudainatov

X

 

21/21

Persons who left the Board of Directors on September 13, 2011

Yury Petrov

X

22/22

5/5

Persons who joined the Board of Directors on September 13, 2011

Matthias Warnig

X

X

11/11

3/3

4/4

Note: the first figure shows the number of meetings that a member of the Board of Directors attended; the second figure shows the total number of meetings that the member could have attended.

 

Activity of the Board of Directors in 2011

The Board of Directors held 33 meetings during 2011 (6 with members present and 27 by voting in absentia), at which it reviewed and took decisions on various aspects of Company business.

Matters considered by the Board of Directors during the reporting period (matters in the competence of the Board of Directors in accordance with Article 65 of the Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies as well as other matters concerning the Company's current business) were as follows:

·; on activities of the Board of Directors and of committees of the Board of Directors (12);

·; on cooperation and on implementation of business projects (19);

·; on the work of the Management Board (1);

·; on the membership of the Management Board and on members of the Management Board who are concurrently members of the management bodies of other organizations (3);

·; on equity participation of the Company in other companies and the termination of such participation (4);

·; on approval of performance criteria and meeting of performance criteria by senior managers (5);

·; on the carrying оut/approval of transactions, which fall within the competence of the Board of Directors in accordance with the Company Charter (37);

·; on approval of performance indicators for CEOs of key Group companies (2);

·; on change in the сharter capital of a key Group company (6);

·; on approval, adjustment, and implementation of Company business plans (3);

·; on performance results of the CEOs of key Group companies for the purpose of annual bonuses (1);

·; on amendments to organizational structure (2);

·; on design of strategic programmes of the Company (4).

 

Information concerning the most important issues has been disclosed by the Company in press-releases and in the form of communications on material facts/information, which may have substantial impact on the price of Company securities.

 

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

Rosneft has Board Committees for Audit, HR and Remuneration, and Strategic Planning, which carry out preliminary consideration of important issues and prepare relevant recommendations to the Board of Directors.

 

Formation and operation of Rosneft's BoD Committees is in accordance with theRegulation on the Procedure for Formation and Operation of BoD Committees of Rosneft, the Regulation on the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, the Regulation on the HR and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, and the Regulation on the Strategic Planning Committee of the Board of Directors of Rosneft (these Regulations were approved by decision of the Board of Directors on October 18, 2008, minutes №5).

 

The Committees consist of non-executive members of the Board of Directors of Rosneft and are headed by independent directors.

 

Memberships of the Committees in 2011 were determined by decisions of the Board of Directors of Rosneft in June 2010, June 2011, and September 2011.

 

Name of the Committee

Membership on 31.12.2011

Functions of the Committee

The Committee ensures interaction between the BoD and the following groups

Audit Committee

 

 

Hans-Joerg Rudloff (Chairman)

Andrey Kostin

Matthias Warnig

 

- ensuring BoD participation in control over the Company's financial and operating activity;

- assessment of candidates to be Rosneft's external auditor, assessment of the auditor's opinion, of the quality of auditing services provided and observance by the auditor of auditing independence;

- assessment of the efficacy of procedures for internal control and risk management, and preparing proposals for their improvement;

- preliminary review of the Company's financial accounts;

- oversight of completeness and accuracy of Rosneft's tax, financial and management accounting;

- oversight of the efficiency of work by structural subdivisions that carry out internal control and audit functions;

- external auditors;

- the Internal Audit Commission;

- structural sub-divisions carrying out internal control and audit functions;

- executive bodies.

 

HR and Remuneration Committee

 

 

Andrey Kostin (Chairman)

Matthias Warnig

Hans-Joerg Rudloff

 

Members of the HR and Remuneration Committee are not entitled to participate in evaluation of their own performance and decisions about their remuneration

- ensuring that highly qualified specialists are hired to work as Company managers and creating necessary incentives for them to work successfully;

- participation in HR policy formation, design of principles and criteria for determining the scale of remuneration and compensation to members of the Board of Directors, Management Board, and senior executives of Rosneft;

- development of long-term remuneration programmes for Company employees;

- reviewing reports on sustainable development by the Company, prepared in compliance with international standards;

- jointly with the personnel department: preliminary assessment of candidates to key positions, and also preliminary approval of the forms and amounts of remuneration, compensation and other payments to such persons.

- structural sub-divisions responsible for personnel policy;

- executive bodies.

 

Strategic Planning Committee

 

 

Sergey Shishin (Chairman)

Alexander Nekipelov

Nikolay Tokarev

Dmitry Shugaev

 

- defining strategic goals and developing business priorities of Rosneft;

- business planning, design of budgets and other business plans, and monitoring of their implementation;

- review and preparation for the Board of Directors of recommendations on issues concerning strategic development and management of the Company;

- monitoring and assessment of efficient implementation of strategy, which has been approved by the Board of Directors;

- assessment of the efficiency of Company interaction with investors;

- analysis and provision of information to the Board of Directors concerning the main aspects of economic policy of the Russian Government in the Company's sphere of business;

- analysis of proposals by structural subdivisions responsible for strategic planning concerning approval, amendment, and implementation of Company development strategy;

- review of strategic investment projects.

- structural sub-divisions responsible for strategic planning;

- executive bodies.

 

Activity of Committees of the Board of Directors in 2011

 

The activity of the Committees in 2011 received a positive assessment from the Board of Directors (minutes №19 dated April 27, 2012).

 

Audit Committee 

Activities of the Audit Committee were based on six-month plans. The Committee met 10 times in the course of the year, including five meetings in the form of joint presence and five meetings in absentia.

In each quarter, the Audit Committee carried out preliminary reviews of Rosneft consolidated financial accounts prepared in accordance with US GAAP, IFRS and RAS and also reviewed audits or overviews of these accounts. The Committee approved the work plan of the Control and Audit Division for 2011 and a report on the results of its work in 2010.

 

The Committee reviewed the Company's new system of internal control and audit and submitted its recommendations to the Board of Directors and Rosneft management concerning further steps in this matter.

 

At the proposal of Alexander Nekipelov (Chairman of the Committee until 13.09.2011) the question of management of working capital was considered and a recommendation was issued to the Company's Treasury Department.

 

The Committee approved the results of work in the first half of 2011 by the Internal Audit Division and approved a work plan for the newly created Internal Audit Department in September-December 2011.

The Committee reviewed results of the competition among auditing organizations and gave an assessment of candidacies for carrying out audit of financial accounts of Rosneft and its subsidiaries, and of consolidated financial accounts in accordance with US GAAP. Recommendations were made on remuneration for the auditor's services in 2011.

 

The following tasks were carried out at a joint meeting of the Audit Committee and the Internal Audit Commission: the Rosneft Annual Report for 2010 was given a preliminary review; an assessment was given of the opinion of the Rosneft auditor concerning the Company's financial accounts for 2010; a review was carried out of the conclusions of the Internal Audit Commission for 2010 (following checks of Company operations and finances; checks of annual accounts; and of the accuracy of data in the Annual Report); and a review was carried out of recommendations to the Annual General Meeting Shareholders of Rosneft concerning the procedure for distribution of Company profit, the amount of dividends to be paid for 2010, and the procedure for their payment.

 

The Audit Committee also prepared recommendations to the Rosneft Board of Directors on the following issues: preliminary approval of the Rosneft Annual Report for 2010; annual financial accounts, including profit & loss accounts, of Rosneft for 2010.

 

In the course of 2011, the Chairman of the Audit Committee held regular meetings with senior managers of Rosneft, with representatives of external auditors, and with the head of the Internal Audit Department.

 

HR and Remuneration Committee

Actions by the Committee were based on approved six-month plans and the Committee held nine meetings in 2011.

 

The Committee prepared recommendations to the Board of Directors for decisions on the following issues: approval of performance criteria for senior managers of Rosneft for 2011; achievement of performance targets by senior managers of Rosneft and amounts of their annual remuneration for 2010; approval of amendments to the Regulation on Annual Bonuses of Senior Managers and the Heads of Autonomous Structural Subdivisions of Rosneft; approval of the Regulation on the Annual Bonus of the CEO and Principal Executives of Rosneft Group; approval of the Regulation on Annual Bonuses of Middle-Managers, Specialists and Personnel of the Rosneft Central Office; on amendments and additions to the Regulation on Terms of Wage Payment and Social Protection for Rosneft Personnel; on amendments to the organizational structure of Rosneft; on definition of the position of Rosneft with respect to the amounts of annual bonuses payable to CEOs of key Group subsidiaries for 2010.

 

The Chairman of the HR and Remuneration Committee met regularly with senior Company managers and the head of the HR Department as part of work for creation of a new organizational structure at Rosneft, and as part of joint design of an annual incentive system for senior managers, principal executives, CEOs, middle managers, specialist and workers of Rosneft, based on performance indicators. Introduction of the new system will enable greater objectivity in assessment of attainments.

 

Strategic Planning Committee

Actions by the Strategic Planning Committee were based on approved six-month plans and five meetings were held during the reporting period.

 

The Committee prepared recommendations to the Board of Directors on the following issues: on dividend policy of Rosneft; on results of implementation of the Rosneft business plan in nine months of 2011, expected business results for 2011 and proposal for adjustments to the business plan for 2011; on the updated integrated project for construction at the Vankor group of fields and revised cost of project execution; on the modernization and development programme for Rosneft refining enterprises; on revised cost of the first launch complex at the Tuapse Refinery and increase of the financing limit for RN-Tuapse Refinery in 2011; on approval of the Company business plan for 2012.

 

The Chairman and members of the Committee held regular working meetings in course of the year with senior managers of the Company, and with heads of structural subdivisions involved in business planning and development of the Rosneft Development Strategy.

 

Management Bodies of Rosneft

Management of the current business of Rosneft is the responsibility of the Company's executive bodies: the Management Board (Collegial Executive Body) and the President (Chief Executive Officer), which are subordinated to the Board of Directors and the General Meeting of Shareholders of the Company.

 

The system of the management bodies of Rosneft and their work are regulated by:

·; the Charter of Rosneft;

·; the Regulation on the Collegial Executive Body (Management Board), approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft on June 19,2009 (unnumbered minutes, dated 29.06.2009);

·; the Regulation on the Chief Executive Office (President) , approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft on June 19,2009 (unnumbered minutes, dated 29.06.2009);

·; the Code of Corporate Conduct, approved by the Board of Directors of the Company (minutes № 6, dated 17.05.2006) and amendments approved by the Board of Directors on 22.05.2007 and 30.12.2011.

 

The Management Board of Rosneft

In accordance with clause 12.3 of the Company Charter, members of the Management Board are appointed by the Board of Directors for a period of three years. The procedure for formation of the Management Board and requirements for professional qualifications of its members (including education and experience) are established by internal documents of the Company.

 

The Board of Directors decided on June 10, 2011 (minutes № 1) to terminate the authorities of the Management Board, whichwasappointed on March 5, 2009, and to appoint a new Management Board as of June 11, 2011, for a period of three years (until June 11, 2014) consisting of five members. The membership of the Management Board was unchanged in the period from June11, 2011 until December 31, 2011.

 

 

  

Members of the Management Board of Rosneft (as of December 31, 2011)

 

Eduard Khudainatov

Chairman of the Management Board, President of Rosneft.

Born in 1960. Graduated in 1996 from the International Business Academy, specializing in Trade. Completed a second higher education in 2000 at Tyumen State University, specializing in Law. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 1993 to 1996 - Head of the companies Evikhon, Evikhon-2 and Yuganskpromfinco.

In 1996 - Deputy Head of the Administration of the town of Nefteyugansk, with responsibility for general issues.

From 1996 to 2000 - First Deputy Head of Nefteyugansk District, Head of Administration of the town of Poikovsky.

From 2000 to 2003 - Chief Federal Inspector for Nenets Autonomous District in the Office of the Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the North-Western Federal District.

From 2003 to 2008 - CEO of OJSC Severneftegazprom.

From 2008 - Vice-President of Rosneft.

From 2009 - First Vice-President of Rosneft.

From September 6, 2010 - President and Chairman of the Management Board of Rosneft.

From 2011 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Larisa Kalanda

Deputy Chairman of the Management Board, Vice-President of Rosneft.

Born in 1964. Graduated from the Sverdlov Institute of Law in 1985, specializing in Law. Completed postgraduate studies at the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Belarus Academy of Sciences in 1994. Distinguished lawyer of the Russian Federation.

From 1997 - Deputy Head of the Legal Service of OJSC TNK and OJSC TNK-BP Management. From 2003 -Vice-President of OJSC TNK-BP Management, responsible for legal support.

From 2006 - Vice-President of Rosneft, responsible for legal support of Company business, and for designing and implementing legal policy to protect the assets and interests of the Company (of Company shareholders)and of subsidiary companies (equity affiliates). Also responsible for corporate governance since February 2011.

 

Pavel Fedorov

First Vice-President of Rosneft.

Born in 1974. Graduated from Novosibirsk State University in 1995 specializing in economic cybernetics and study of operations. Obtained a Masters Degree from Washington State University in 1998.

From 1998 to 2005 - Executive Director, Vice-President of Morgan Stanley (London).

From 2006 to 2007 - Managing Director of UBC (Moscow).

From 2007 to 2010 - Managing Director, Senior Advisor of Morgan Stanley (Moscow).

From April 2010 - First Vice-President of Rosneft.

 

Gani Gilayev

Vice-President of Rosneft.

Born in 1956. Graduated in 1990 from Ufa Oil Institute specializing in development and operation of oil & gas fields.

From 1975 - Drilling Assistant at Vostokneft production unit (part of the Sakhalinneft conglomerate).

From 1993 to 2006 - management positions at Sakhalinmorneftegaz, Rosneft-Termneft and RN-Krasnodarneftegaz.

From 2006 - CEO of Udmurtneft.

From 2008 - Director of the Oil & Gas Production Department of Rosneft.

From October 2010 - Acting Vice-President of Rosneft with responsibility for production.

From September 2011 - Vice-President of Rosneft with responsibility for exploration and production.

 

Petr Lazarev

Head of Treasury at Rosneft (from February 2012 - Financial Director)

Born in 1967. Graduated in 1990 from the Plekhanov Economics Institute (Moscow) specializing in finance and credit.

From 1990 to 1993 - occupied various posts at the USSR Ministry of Finance and the Russian Ministry of Economics and Finance.

From 1993 to 1995 - occupied various posts at the Securities Department of the International Joint-Stock Bank of Savings Banks.

From 1995 to 1996 - member of the Executive Board, Head of the Securities Department at the International Joint-Stock Bank of Savings Banks.

From 1996 to 1999 - occupied senior positions at ACB Center, CJSC Finco-Invest Finance Company, and Russian Industrial Bank.

From 2000 to 2004 - Head of Promissory Note and Investment Programmes in the Finance Department at OJSC Rosneft, Deputy Director, Head of Securities in the Finance Department.

From June 2004 - Head of Treasury at Rosneft.

From June 11, 2011 - Member of the Management Board of Rosneft.

From February 2012 - Financial Director of Rosneft.

 

The President of Rosneft

 

In accordance with clause 11.3 of the Company Charter, the President is appointed by the Board of Directors for a period of three years.

The Board of Directors of the Company decided on September 4, 2010 (minutes № 17) to appoint Eduard Khudainatov as the President of Rosneft.

 

  

 

Remuneration of Members of the Board of Directors and Management

 

Remuneration of Members of the Board of Directors

 

The Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies stipulates that, by decision of the General Meeting of Shareholders, members of the Board of Directors may be paid remuneration and/or compensation of their costs associated with exercise by them of their functions during the period when they are in office. The scale of such remuneration and compensation is established by decision of the General Meeting of Shareholders.

 

Criteria for levels of remuneration

Criteria for setting levels of remuneration to members of the Board of Directors are established by the Regulation on the Procedure for Calculation and Payment of Remuneration to Members of the Board of Directors and Compensation of their Expenses, which was approved by the Rosneft Board of Directors on April 28, 2009 (minutes №4).

 

In accordance with this Regulation, remuneration is paid to members of the Board of Directors who have 'independent' status, and to members of the Board of Directors who are authorized representatives of the interests of the Russian Federation in the Board of Directors, except for Board members who are also state officials and the CEO of Rosneft (the Company President).

 

A maximum possible level of remuneration during the reporting period is set for members of the Board of Directors, and this level is approved by the Board of Directors.

 

Factors taken into account in setting the final amount of remuneration for work in the reporting period are:

- factual participation in work as a member of the Board of Directors;

- factual participation in work of a BoD Committee as the Chairman of that Committee;

- factual participation in work of a BoD Committee as a member of that Committee.

 

The Board of Directors of Rosneft can recommend lowering the final amount of remuneration to members of the Board of Directors taking account of the financial situation of the Company. The Board of Directors also gives recommendations as to whether remuneration will be paid in the form of cash or shares of Rosneft.

 

Rosneft compensates all expenses associated with execution by members of the Board of Directors of their functions (accommodation, meals, travel, including VIP lounge services, and other payments and tariffs for air and (or) rail transport services), as well as costs arising for a Board member in connection with proceedings brought by third parties (including expenses for defense in court, etc.) as a result of actions by the Board member if the actions which caused the proceedings to be brought were carried out by the Board member in the interests of the Company. The Company also compensates expenses which may be incurred by a member of the Board of Directors in connection with administrative, criminal or other court action arising from his or her activities as a member of the Board.

 

Based on the decision of the Board of Directors on April 14, 2011, the General Meeting of Shareholders on June 10, 2011 decided to approve the payment of remuneration to members of the Board of Directors by transfer to them of shares in Rosneft, as follows:

·; 25,238 shares to Andrey Kostin;

·; 25,238 shares to Alexander Nekipelov;

·; 25,238 shares to Hans-Joerg Rudloff;

·; 20,821 shares to Andrey Reus;

·; 20,821 shares to Nikolay Tokarev;

·; 18,928 shares to Vladimir Bogdanov;

·; 14,021 shares to Sergey Bodganchikov.

 

The Shareholder Meeting also confirmed payment of compensation for expenses incurred by members of the Board of Directors in connection with exercise by them of their functions, specifically expenses for: accommodation, meals, travel (including VIP lounge services), and other payments and tariffs for air and (or) railway transport services.

 

Remuneration of Management

 

Remuneration of senior management (President, First Vice-President, Vice-Presidents and officials of equivalent rank) and heads of independent subdivisions of Rosneft consists of monthly salary and an annual premium.

 

No additional remuneration is paid to Company managers for their work in management bodies of Rosneft or its subsidiaries and equity affiliates (the Rosneft Management Board, the boards of directors of subsidiaries).

 

The level of monthly wage is stipulated in labor contracts, which are made when managers are hired.

An annual bonus is paid to managers only after approval by the Board of Directors of a relevant decision based on Company performance in the reporting year. The annual bonus depends directly on the results of work by the manager in the reporting year and its size is determined by the analysis of attainment of key performance indicators set for the manager in the year. The annual bonus of the Company President is established depending on achievement by him or her of individual performance indicators, which coincide with key indicators of Company performance. The annual bonus for other managers consists of two parts: a bonus for the manager's individual results and a bonus for team results (in the manager's sphere of business and for the Company as a whole).

 

Approval of key performance indicators and review of their achievement are carried out as follows:

·; performance criteria are compiled on the basis of the Company's development strategy and Company tasks in the reporting year;

·; individual performance criteria for senior managers and collective performance indicators are approved by the Board of Directors of Rosneft;

·; individual criteria for performance by heads of independent subdivisions are approved by the Management Board of Rosneft;

·; at the end of the reporting year appropriate services within the Company measure achievement of key performance criteria (collective and individual), using audited consolidated financial accounts and management accounts;

·; the amount of bonuses for senior managers are approved by the Rosneft Board of Directors, and bonuses for heads of independent subdivisions are approved by the Management Board.

The structure of remuneration to management (ratio of its fixed and variable parts) corresponds to generally accepted international practice.

 

A bonus may be paid to senior managers and to other personnel for outstanding contributions to Company development during the reporting period. The amount of such a bonus and its actual payment is subject to the consent of the Board Committee for HR and Remuneration.

 

 

 

 

 

Internal Control and Audit

 

Rosneft has a system of control over its business, consisting of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, the Audit Commission, an independent auditor, Company management, and the Internal Audit Department.

 

Subordination and coordination between elements of the control system ensure a level of independence which is essential for efficient functioning, and which corresponds to latest international practice in this field.

 

Audit Commission

 

The Audit Commission is a key part of the system of control over Company financial and operating activities. The Company has a Regulation on the Audit Commission, approved with amendments by the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft on June 19, 2009 (unnumbered minutes, dated 29.06.2009).

 

The Commission consists of five members elected by the General Meeting of Shareholders and exercises its function until the next year's General Meeting. Members of the Internal Audit Commission cannot serve at the same time as members of the Board of Directors or occupy other posts in Company management bodies. The principal function of the Audit Commission is to exercise oversight over Rosneft's business, its management bodies, officials, subdivisions, services and representative offices.

 

Responsibilities of the Audit Commission include auditing of the Company's financial documents and book-keeping records.

 

An audit of the business of Rosneft is carried out on the basis of business results for the year (a scheduled audit) or at any other time, subject to a decision or order by entities or persons who have the right to initiate such an audit. An internal audit may be carried out following a decision by the Audit Commission, by the General Meeting of Shareholders, or by the Board of Directors, and at the request of a shareholder (shareholders), who own (alone or jointly) no less than 10% of voting shares of the Company.

 

The following tasks fall within the scope of the Internal Audit Commission:

·; review of the Company's financial documents, financial accounts, reports by inventory commissions, and comparison of these documents with primary book-keeping data;

·; analysis of accuracy and completeness of financial, tax, management and statistical accounting;

·; audit of correct execution of the Company's operating and financial planning, as approved by the Board of Directors;

·; audit of correct execution of the procedure, approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders, for distribution of Company profit for the financial year;

·; analysis of the financial position of the Company, its solvency, asset liquidity, gearing ratio, net assets, and charter capital, identification of ways of improving the financial state of the Company, and preparing recommendations to management bodies;

·; audit of timeliness and correctness of payments to suppliers of goods and services, of payments to the state budget and to non-budget funds, accrual and payment of dividends and of loan interest, and settlement of other obligations;

·; confirmation of accuracy of data in the Company's annual report(s), in annual financial accounts, and in accounting documentation prepared for tax and statistics agencies and for executive government bodies;

·; audit of competence of the Chief Executive Officer to make agreements in the Company's name;

·; audit of competence in decisions taken by the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer, and the Liquidation Commission, and their compliance with the Company Charter and decisions by the General Meeting of Shareholders;

·; analysis of decisions by the General Meeting of Shareholders to determine their compliance with law and with the Company Charter.

 

In accordance with its approved work schedule for 2011-2012, the Audit Commission carried out four audits of documents and prepared an opinion for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders concerning the results of audit of Company business and of financial accounts for the year, and also concerning the accuracy of information contained in the Annual Report.

 

Membership of the Audit Commission (as of December 31, 2011)

 

The following membership of the Internal Audit Commission was elected at the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft on June 10, 2011:

 

Georgy Nozadze

Chairman of the Audit Commission

Year of birth: 1979

Education: Higher

Organization: Russian Ministry for Economic Development

Official post: Deputy Director of Department

 

Irina Marchuk (Baronova)

Year of birth:1983

Education: Higher

Organization: LLC Science-Technology-Security

Official post: Deputy CEO

 

Sergey Pakhomov

Year of birth: 1983

Education: Higher

Organization: Federal Agency for State Property Management

Official post: Deputy Head of Division

 

Alexander Yugov

Year of birth: 1981

Education: Higher

Organization: Federal Agency for State Property Management

Official post: Deputy Head of Department

 

Tatyana Fisenko

Year of birth: 1961

Education: Higher

Organization: Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation

Official post: Director of the Financial Department

 

Members of the Audit Commission did not receive any remuneration for their work in the Audit Commission during the reporting year.

 

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

 

Formation and activities of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors are defined by the Regulation on the Procedure for Formation and Operation of BoD Committees of Rosneft and the Regulation on the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, approved by a decision of the Board of Directors of the Company on October 18, 2008 (minutes № 5).

 

Under its authorities the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:

·; ensures constant coordination between the Board of Directors and the auditor, independent appraiser, the Audit Commission, the Internal Audit Department, executive bodies and financial managers;

·; assesses the quality of auditor's services and observance by the auditor of requirements for auditing independence, and also coordinates the work of the Company and the Internal Audit Department to ensure completeness of audit provision;

·; oversees completeness and accuracy of the tax, financial and management accounting of Rosneft;

·; conducts preliminary review of the financial accounts of the Company, prepared in accordance with US GAAP, and of materials containing accounting data, which are to be publicly available;

·; carries out preliminary review of the financial accounts of the parent Company and consolidated accounts, prepared in accordance with Russian Accounting Standards;

·; prepares proposals for improvement of internal accounting procedures and assesses, classifies and prepares proposals for minimizing possible risks arising in the process of Company business, jointly with executive bodies and structural subdivisions that are responsible for internal control and audit.

 

The Audit Committee also reviews and makes recommendations on the following issues in the competence of the Board of Directors:

·; recommendations to the General Meeting of Shareholders concerning distribution of profit and losses as a result of business in the financial year, as well as the amount of dividends and the procedure for their payment;

·; determination of the value (in money terms) of Rosneft property, and the placement and redemption price for issuable securities in instances stipulated by the Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies;

·; determination of the level of payment for services provided by an auditor; approval of transactions which exceed limits set by the Company business plan (non-standard transactions) (with the assistance of subdivisions that carry out internal control and audit functions).

 

Internal Audit Department

 

The Internal Audit Department is a structural subdivision of Rosneft which was set up as part of efforts by the Company to improve internal control and audit systems, based on a decision of the Board of Directors on June 23, 2011, by transformation of the Control and Audit Division and the Internal Audit Division. A Division for Internal Audit Methodology was also set up within the new Department.

 

The Department is directly subordinated to the Company President and answerable to the Board of Directors through the Board's Audit Committee.

 

The main tasks of the Internal Audit Department are:

·; assessing efficiency of the internal control system of the Company and of its subsidiaries and equity affiliates;

·; control over the efficiency of investment processes;

·; review of the business of the Company and of its subsidiaries and equity affiliates.

 

The Department carries out checks to assess the efficiency of business processes, operating and investment activities of the Company and its corporate services (financial processes, information systems and corporate governance processes), designs recommendations to address shortcomings that are identified and monitors execution of these recommendations.

 

The Internal Audit Department assists the Company's management bodies in ensuring:

·; the accuracy and completeness of information that is provided concerning the business of the Company and the business of its branches, representative offices, and of its subsidiaries and equity affiliates;

·; efficiency and achievement of results in Company business and in the business of its subsidiaries and equity affiliates;

·; identification of internal reserves for improving the business efficiency of the Company and of its subsidiary and affiliate companies and organizations;

·; safe-keeping of the property of the Company and of its subsidiaries and equity affiliates;

·; implementation and observation by the Company of the requirements of Russian law.

 

The Internal Audit Department provides its assistance by the conduct of internal procedures with the involvement of other appropriate structural subdivisions of the Company .

 

The Director of the Internal Audit Department reports periodically to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Company President concerning activities by the Department, the results of its work, and the state of internal control and measures to raise efficiency of the internal control system.

The Department collaborates with Company management bodies and with the Audit Commission and external auditors of the Company, and with audit commissions (internal auditors) and external auditors of subsidiaries in order to carry out the tasks, which are entrusted to it.

 

Company Auditors

 

CJSC ACG RBS

By decision of the General Meeting of Company Shareholders, Closed Joint-stock Company Auditing and Consulting Group Business Systems Development (CJSC ACG RBS) was appointed to carry out independent audit of book-keeping and financial accounts of Rosneft for 2011, prepared to Russian Accounting Standards.

 

Procedure for selection of the auditor

 

As prescribed by clause 1 of Article 5 of the Federal Law on Auditing and Article 86 of the Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies, the annual financial accounts of OJSC Rosneft Oil Company, prepared under RAS, are subject to obligatory audit to confirm the accuracy of the reporting data, which they contain.

 

The Company therefore holds an annual open competition to select an auditor, as stipulated by internal documents. The Company's tendering sub-committee selects the winner of the competition after reviewing the tenders received, and assessing and comparing them in accordance with criteria and procedures indicated in the call to tender and the tender documentation, and also based on technical assessment of the proposal and its price.

 

A notification of the conduct of a tender for the selection of audit organizations, containing information on terms of the tender (form of the tender and object of the contract, including the amount and a short description of the services to be provided, initial contract price, etc.), is published on a special Internet site (http://tender.rosneft.ru) and in an official print publication.

The proposed winner of the annual tendering competition for choice of an auditing organization is put forward for consideration by the BoD Audit Committee of Rosneft. Based on the recommendation of the BoD Audit Committee, the Board of Directors takes a decision on the candidacy for the role of auditor to be proposed for approval by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.

 

Payment for services by the auditor

Remuneration payable to the auditor is determined on the basis of planned working time and hourly rates of the auditor's specialists, as indicated in the auditor's commercial proposal.

 

Based on the recommendation of the BoD Audit Committee, the Board of Directors set the price for audit by CJSC ACG RBS of Rosneft annual financial accounts to Russian Accounting Standards for 2011 at RUB 2,839,375 including VAT.

 

Rosneft occasionally calls on the services of CJSC ACG RBS for execution of special tasks and resolution of methodological issues.

 

LLC Ernst & Young

LLC Ernst & Young audits consolidated annual accounts prepared in accordance with international accounting standards as well as overview of interim (quarterly) consolidated accounts prepared in accordance with international accounting standards.

 

Procedure for selection of the auditor

 

The auditor is selected through a closed tender, carried out by the Company among the Big 4 auditing firms. The selection is made on the basis of a thorough analysis of tendering proposals in order establish their suitability for Company needs.

 

The candidate for the role of auditor of annual accounts prepared in accordance with international accounting standards is assessed and approved by the BoD Audit Committee. Confirmation of the candidate by the General Meeting of Shareholders is not required.

 

Based on the analysis of proposals, the BoD Audit Committee decided to appoint the company Ernst & Young as the auditor of Rosneft's consolidated annual accounts for 2011 prepared in accordance with international accounting standards

 

Payment of services by the auditor

 

Remuneration payable to LLC Ernst & Young for its services is determined by the BoD Audit Committee on the basis of planned working time and hourly rates of the auditor's specialists, as indicated in the auditor's commercial proposal. In accordance with the contract for provision of auditing services between Rosneft and LLC Ernst & Young, the terms and sum of remuneration are confidential information and cannot be disclosed.

 

The Company also calls on LLC Ernst & Young for provision of consulting (non-audit) services. In 2011 the share of consulting (non-audit) services in total services, which LLC Ernst & Young provided to Rosneft, was about 23%.

 

 

   

Share Capital

 

The authorized capital of Rosneft as of December 31, 2011, was RUB 105,981,778.17 and was divided into 10,598,177,817 ordinary shares with par value of RUB 0.01 each.

 

In accordance with the Charter, the Company has the right to additional placement of 6,332,510,632 ordinary shares with par value of RUB 0.01 each and with total par value of RUB 63,325,106.32 and offering the same rights as outstanding ordinary shares of Rosneft. A decision on increase of Rosneft charter capital by placement through open subscription of additional authorized shares in the Company, not exceeding 25% of total outstanding shares of Rosneft, is taken by the Board of Directors. In other instances a decision is taken by the General Meeting of Shareholders.

 

The state registration number of issue of ordinary shares of the Company is 1‑0200122‑А.

 

The date of state registration of issue of ordinary shares of the Company is September 29, 2005.

 

No issues or placement of additional shares of Rosneft were carried out in 2011.

 

The number of shareholders registered in the shareholder register of Rosneft as of December 31, 2011 (without disclosure of information by nominee shareholders) was 32,047 (including 15 nominee shareholders). The number of nominee shareholders decreased by two in comparison with December 31, 2010.

 

Rosneft had no preferred shares as of December 31, 2011.

 

In 2007-2011 the Russian Government owned 75.16 % of shares in Rosneft through OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ, which is in 100% federal ownership. The stake in OJSC Rosneft Oil Company owned directly by the Russian Government (in the person of the Federal Agency for State Property Management) was 0.000000009%. The Russian Federation did not have a special right to participation in management of Rosneft (a 'golden share').

 

Shareholders of Rosneft owning more than 1% of share capital

Main shareholders of Rosneft

December 31, 2010

December 31, 2011

Shareholders

Number of shares

Stake in share capital, %

Number of shares

Stake in share capital, %

OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ*

7,965,816,383

75.16

7,965,816,383

75.16

LLC RN-Razvitie**

998,192,487

9.42

1,010,158,003

9.53

OJSC Sberbank of Russia (nominee)

1,379,763,288

13.02

1,343,007,712

12.67

Other legal entities owning more than 1% of shares

201,232,578

1.90

229,595,840

2.17

LLC RN-Stroi ***

668,815

0.01

0

0.00

Individuals

53,173,081

0.50

49,599,879

0.47

TOTAL

10,598,177,817

100.00

10,598,177,817

100.00

* OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ is in 100% federal ownership. The stake in OJSC Rosneft Oil Company owned directly by the Russian Government (in the person of the Federal Agency for State Property Management) is 0.000000009% (one share).

** 100% in LLC RN-Razvitie is held by LLC RN-Trade. 99.9999% in LLC RN-Trade is held by OJSC Rosneft and 0.0001% is held by LLC Neft-Aktiv,which is a 100% subsidiary of OJSC Rosneft. Consequently OJSC Rosneft indirectly holds a 100% stake in LLC RN-Razvitie. Rosneft shares owned by LLC RN-Razvitie are reflected as treasury shares in the Company's consolidated financial statements under US GAAP.

*** Shares purchased at the request of shareholders in 2009 in accordance with Articles 75 and 76 of the Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies. 78,297 shares were used to pay remuneration to independent members of the Board of Directors in 2010. The remaining shares were sold to LLC RN-Stroi, which is a 100% subsidiary of Rosneft. In 2011 the shares were consolidated on the balance sheet of LLC RN-Razvitie.

 

Rosneft updated information each month during 2011 on its corporate Internet site concerning shareholders who own more than 1% of its Charter capital. Rosneft's management has no information about any shareholders with equity stakes exceeding 1% (shareholders of Rosneft with equity stakes exceeding 1% of total outstanding shares), other than those listed above.

Rosneft's shares are traded on an organized securities market in Russia: CJSC MICEX Stock Exchange (B List). The rights of a shareholder (owner of ordinary shares), including voting rights on each voting share of Rosneft, are specified by Article 5.8 of the Company Charter.

 

Order № 06-1380/pz-i of the Federal Service for Financial Markets dated June 20, 2006, permits placement and trading of 2,140,000,000 common shares of Rosneft outside the Russian Federation.

In July 2006, Rosneft carried out listing of Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs) on the London Stock Exchange. Issue of GDRs, which certify rights in respect of ordinary shares of Rosneft in accordance with foreign law, was carried out by J.P. Morgan Europe Limited. One Global Depositary Receipt is equivalent to one common share of Rosneft. As of December 31, 2011, GDRs were issued for 1,249 mln ordinary shares, representing 11.8% of total outstanding shares.

 

A list of the rights of owners of common shares of OJSC Rosneft Oil Company is presented in Paragraph 5.8 of the Company Charter, which is posted on the Rosneft website (www.rosneft.ru).

 

Information on ownership of Rosneft shares by members of the Board of Directors and Management Board of the Company

Members of the Board of Directors and Management Board

Number of common shares

(as of December 31, 2011)

Shake in charter capital, %

Alexander Nekipelov

25,852

0.0002%

Vladimir Bodganov

18,928

0.0002%

Andrey Kostin

84,951

0.0008%

Hans-Joerg Rudloff

484,951

(shares and GDRs)

0.0046%

Sergey Shishin

-

-

Dmitry Shugaev

-

-

Nikolay Tokarev

20,821

0.0002%

Matthias Warnig

-

-

Eduard Khudainatov

5,570,060

0.0526%

Gani Gilayev

123,792

0.0012%

Larisa Kalanda

874,168

0.0082%

Petr Lazarev

70,895

0.0007%

Pavel Fedorov

728,978

0.0069%

 

Transactions by members of the Board of Directors and Management Board with Rosneft securities

The Company's Regulation on insider information obliges members of the Board of Directors, the Management Board, and the Company President to disclose information on any transactions which they carry out with Rosneft securities.

Transactions were carried out with Company securities in 2011 by members of the Board of Directors and Management Board of Rosneft. Details of such transactions were presented to the Company within the time limits stipulated by internal documents and disclosed on the securities market in compliance with acting legislation.

 

 

 

Members of the Board of Directors and Management Board

Date

Number of shares/GDRs

Transaction type

Alexander Nekipelov

September 2011

26,099

Sale

Eduard Khudainatov

April 2011

2,590,452

Purchase

Eduard Khudainatov

June 2011

1,988,000

Purchase

Eduard Khudainatov

September 2011

455,060

Purchase

Larisa Kalanda

April 2011

349,128

Purchase

Larisa Kalanda

September 2011

156,310

Purchase

Pavel Fedorov

April 2011

349,128

Purchase

Pavel Fedorov

September 2011

229,850

Purchase

Gani Gilayev

September 2011

82,120

Purchase

Petr Lazarev

September 2011

38,340

Purchase

 

 

 

  

Dividend Policy 

 

On May 17, 2006, Rosneft's Board of Directors voted to approve the Regulation on Dividend Policy, which was developed in accordance with Russian legislation, the Company Charter, and the Code of Corporate Conduct.

 

Rosneft's dividend policy strikes a balance between shareholders' interests and the Company's business needs, and is intended to improve Rosneft's investment attractiveness and shareholdervalue. The Company strictly observes the rights, and strives to continuously increase the returns of its shareholders.

 

The decision to pay dividends (and the amount of dividends and the form of payment) is taken by the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft, based on recommendations of the Board of Directors. In deciding dividend amounts the Board is guided by the level of net profit, as reflected in the non-consolidated financial accounts of Rosneft to Russian Accounting Standards. In accordance with Rosneft's dividend policy, recommendations by the Board of Directors on the amount of dividends to be paid are determined by the Company's financial results for the year, but are usually equal to at least 10% of net profit.

 

Rosneft's strategy is to steadily increase dividend payments in absolute terms. In determining the amount of annual dividends, the Board of Directors also takes account of dividend policy of other leading oil & gas companies. A number of other factors may also have an impact on the size of dividend payments, including: the Company's business prospects, its financialsituation and financing needs, and the overall macroeconomic situation and market environment, as well as other factors, including aspects connected with tax and legislation.

 

On March 3, 2011 the Board of Directors approved an addition to the Company's dividend policy, according to which Rosneft will strive to ensure year-on-year growth of dividends contingent on rates of growth of the Company's net income, its financial situation and investments projects in progress.

 

On June10, 2011 the General Meeting of Shareholders approved amendments to the Rosneft Charter, reducing the period for payment of dividends to 60 days (from the date of the decision to pay dividends). It was also established that payment of dividends on shares of each category is carried out simultaneously to all holders of shares in that category.

 

On April 14, 2011 the Board of Directors recommended the General Meeting of Shareholders to allocate 15.2% of non-consolidated net income of Rosneft in 2010, or RUB 29,251 mln, for payment of dividends. Therecommended payment was RUB 2.76 per ordinary share, exceeding the level in the previous year by 20%. On June 10, 2011 the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders accepted the Board recommendation for payment of dividends. A sum of RUB 29,218 mln had been paid to Rosneft shareholders as of December 31, 2011. The payments included RUB 2.76 to the Russian Federal Budget and RUB 21,986 mln to OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ (100% owned by the Federal Government). There were no dividend payments by Rosneft still outstanding to the Federal Budget and OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ at the end of 2011.

 

Dividends were not paid to shareholders recorded in the Rosneft register of shareholders where nominees had failed to provide all necessary information, nor to shareholders who had not informed the issuer's register holder in a timely fashion of a change in the data recorded on their registration form.

 

On April 27, 2012 the Board of Directors of Rosneft recommended the General Meeting of Shareholders to approve dividends for 2011 at a level of RUB 3.45 per share, which is 25% more than the amount in 2010. Total recommended dividends for 2011 are RUB 36,564 mln. The ratio of dividends to non-consolidated net income under RAS for 2011 is 15.4%

 

 

  

Dividend history of Rosneft

Dividends per share1, RUB

Total dividends announced, RUB mln

Total dividends paid, RUB mln

Payout ratio under RAS, %

1999

0.0221

200

200

3.4%

2000

0.0887

800

800

5.3%

2001

0.1219

1,100

1,100

 11.0%

2002

0.1663

1,500

1,500

16.8%

2003

0.1650

1,500

1,500

8.1%

2004

0.1931

1,775

1,775

10.0%

Dividends paid out after the IPO, which closed on July 18, 2006

2005

1.25

11,335

11,336

20.0%

2006

1.33

14,096

14,079

13.3%2

2007

1.60

16,957

16,936

10.5%

2008

1.92

20,349

20,326

14.4%

2009

2.30

24,376

24,341

11.7%

2010

2.76

29,251

29,218

15.2%

20113

3.45

36,564

15.4%

1 The dividend amounts, which are shown, take account of the 1:100 share split carried out in September 2005.

2 Net profit for 2006 corrected for non-recurring items.

3 Dividends recommended by the Board of Directors for approval by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders in June 2012

 

 

 

Information Disclosure

 

Rosneft policy on information disclosure is governed by the requirements of the Federal Law on the Securities Market, the Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies, and the Regulation on Information Disclosure by Issuers of Securities, as approved by the Order of the Federal Financial Markets Service dated October 10, 2006 No.06-117/pz-n, together with the requirements of stock exchanges where the Company's shares are listed, Rosneft's own Regulation on Information Policy, and other requirements and regulatory acts.

 

Rosneft's information disclosure policy is based on the principles of regularity, timeliness, accessibility, accuracy, and completeness. The Company provides timely and full disclosure of information on all aspects of its business (except for instances where the information represents a commercial secret).

 

The main disclosure mechanism is Rosneft's website, which contains relevant information on significant facts and events, on management and organizational structure, and on the Company's operating and financial results. The Rosneft website presents the Charter and other internal documents, annual reports and sustainable development reports, quarterly reports to Russian accounting standards and quarterly reports to US GAAP, and discussion and analysis by Management (MD&A), the Analyst Data Book, presentations, press releases, and information on affiliated entities and other information which could have an impact on the value of Company shares. The Rosneft corporate website is updated regularly, in accordance with the Company's internal regulations.

 

The Company also provides information in the form of brochures and booklets, and through regular meetings, conference calls and press conferences. At the request of shareholders, the Company provides copies of main internal documents, documentation connected with holding of the General Meeting of Shareholders, lists of affiliated entities and other documents in accordance with the standards set out in the Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies.

 

Enhancing Transparency

 

Informational openness is among the chief corporate governance principles at Rosneft. The latest study by the international rating agency Standard & Poor's found Rosneft to the leader among Russian companies in the sphere of information transparency. During 2011 the Company continued to work intensively to raise levels of transparency and to ensure an efficient system of shareholder and investor relations, as evidenced by the following facts:

·; The Company took first place in the nomination 'Best annual report in the oil & gas sector' as part of the 14th Annual Reports Competition held by the RTS and MICEX Stock Exchanges;

·; Rosneft was nominated to the section, 'Best annual report in the non-financial sector' as part of the competition, Best Annual Reports in 2010, organized by Expert RA rating agency;

·; Rosneft was nominated to the competition, 'Best investor relations by a Russian company' in the competition held annually by IR Magazine among companies in the UK and continental Europe;

·; Rosneft won the nominations 'Best Annual Report' and 'Best Information Disclosure' in the 'Investor Relations' competition held by the international publication, World Finance;

·; The Company website won second prize among Russian corporate sites in an annual survey by the Swedish company Hallvarsson & Hallvarsson.

 

The Company devotes particular attention to raising the efficiency of its interactions with shareholders and investors as part of its efforts to further increase informational transparency and openness. Telephone numbers and electronic mail boxes are constantly available for enquires by shareholders and investors.

As part of its interaction with institutional investors and analysts, in 2011 Rosneft held regular presentations of its financial results under US GAAP, as well as meetings in Russia and main international financial centers, and teleconferences.

 

A Regulation on Provision of Information to Shareholders, governing the procedure for provision of information in response to requests by shareholders, was approved in 2011(minutes of the Board of Directors № 36, dated 15.04.2011),

 

Transparency of financial information is another important element of corporate governance. On February 3, 2012 Rosneft was the first large international oil & gas company to publish audited consolidated financial accounts under US GAAP for the fourth quarter and 12 months of 2011.

 

As part of its interaction with interested parties, Rosneft has held round tables since 2007 in regions where it has operations (15 round tables were held in the course of 2011). Rosneft gives special attention to improvement of information disclosure in preparation of its Sustainable Development Report. In 2011 the Report merited an A+ rating (the highest rating for information disclosure under the international GRI standard) and passed an audit by the independent auditor, Ernst & Young.

 

 

 

Responsibility Statement

 

To the best of my knowledge, and in accordance with the applicable reporting principles, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of Rosneft. The management report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal opportunities and risks associated with the expected development of Rosneft.

 

Eduard Khudainatov

President of OJSC Rosneft Oil Company

 

February 3, 2012

 

This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
 
END
 
 
FR EADLPAFAAEFF
Date   Source Headline
17th Oct 20223:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Listing Cancellation
15th Sep 20228:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: 1H 2022 IFRS Results
16th Aug 20225:15 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft informs about submission of a notification for automatic conversion of GDRs
1st Jul 20227:21 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Holds Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
30th Jun 20223:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Publishes Report on Payments to Governments for 2021
30th May 20228:01 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft’s Board of Directors Recommends Record-High Dividends for 2021
14th Mar 20221:15 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft's Board of Directors Approved Resumption of Share Acquisition Program
2nd Mar 20224:36 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
1st Mar 20224:41 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
1st Mar 20224:36 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
1st Mar 20222:30 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: PDMR Shareholding
24th Feb 20224:42 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
24th Feb 20224:37 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
11th Feb 20227:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating Results for 4Q and 12M 2021
11th Feb 20227:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial Results for 4Q and 12M 2021
4th Feb 202210:33 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and CNPC agreed to cooperate in the field of low carbon development
4th Feb 20229:16 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and CNPC strengthen oil supply cooperation
18th Jan 202212:40 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and SPIMEX sign an agreement on cooperation in the development of exchange trading in carbon units
28th Dec 202111:20 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft is the best Russian oil and gas company in the RAEX-Europe ESG rating
21st Dec 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Board of Directors Approves 'ROSNEFT-2030' Strategy
17th Dec 20214:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Director/PDMR Shareholding
15th Dec 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Upgraded its Position in S&P Global's International ESG Rating
13th Dec 20219:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft is among the Best Performing Oil and Gas Companies in CDP's International Climate Rating
12th Nov 20217:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial results for Q3 2021
12th Nov 20217:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating results for Q3 2021
11th Nov 20217:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Completion of Dividend Payment for H1 2021
14th Oct 20212:20 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Sale of 5% in Vostok Oil to a Consortium of Vitol and MME
1st Oct 20211:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: EGM Results
20th Sep 202112:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft became the only Russian O&G company announced as Global Compact LEAD
1st Sep 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Director/PDMR Shareholding
24th Aug 20217:48 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft BoD recommended first half of 2021 dividends at 18.03 rubles per share, representing 50% of the Company's IFRS net profit attributable to Rosneft shareholders
13th Aug 20218:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating results for 2Q and 1H 2021
13th Aug 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial results for 2Q 2021 and 1H 2021
15th Jul 20219:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Completion of Dividends Payment for 2020
30th Jun 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Report on Payments to Governments for 2020
10th Jun 202110:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Signes Heads of Terms for the Sale of a 5% stake in Vostok Oil
2nd Jun 20211:02 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: AGM Results
14th May 20218:01 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial Results for Q1 2021
14th May 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating Results for Q1 2021
30th Apr 202112:39 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Publishes Annual Report for 2020
23rd Apr 20217:45 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: BoD Approves AGM Agenda and Recommends Dividends for 2020
12th Mar 20212:05 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Nominees to the Board of Directors
12th Feb 202111:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operatings results for 4Q and 12M 2020
12th Feb 202111:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial results for 4Q 2020 and 12M 2020
5th Feb 202110:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Agreement Signed on Investment Incentives for Priobskoye Field
4th Feb 20219:38 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and BP Agree to Cooperate on Carbon Management and Sustainability
3rd Feb 202111:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Reconfirmed as a Constituent in the FTSE4Good Index Series Leading on Core Sustainability Metrics
4th Jan 20217:00 amRNSTransaction in Own Shares
29th Dec 20207:00 amRNSTransaction in Own Shares
29th Dec 20207:00 amRNSTransactions Completion

Due to London Stock Exchange licensing terms, we stipulate that you must be a private investor. We apologise for the inconvenience.

To access our Live RNS you must confirm you are a private investor by using the button below.

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

Quickpicks are a member only feature

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.