The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from WS Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.

Less Ads, More Data, More Tools Register for FREE

Pin to quick picksROSN.L Regulatory News (ROSN)

  • There is currently no data for ROSN

Watchlists are a member only feature

Login to your account

Alerts are a premium feature

Login to your account

Annual Financial Report 2013 (FCA Requirement)

30 Apr 2014 16:00

RNS Number : 9263F
OJSC OC Rosneft
30 April 2014
 



 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2013

 

Independent auditor's report

 

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors

of Open Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Open Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company and its subsidiaries, which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2013, and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in shareholders' equity and statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

 

Audited entity's responsibility for the consolidated financial statements

 

Management of the audited entity is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

 

Auditor's responsibility

 

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the fairness of these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Federal Standards on Auditing effective in the Russian Federation and International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.

 

An audit involves performing audit procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The audit procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management of the audited entity, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

 

Opinion

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Open Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company and its subsidiaries as at December 31, 2013, and their financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.

 

Other matter

 

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The information accompanying the consolidated financial statements which has been disclosed as Supplementary oil and gas disclosure on page 94 is presented for additional analysis and is not within the scope of International Financial Reporting Standards. Such information was not subject to our audit procedures performed on the accompanying consolidated financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on this information.

 

R.G. Romanenko

Partner

Ernst & Young LLC 

 

February 4, 2014

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet

 

(in billions of Russian rubles)

 

As of December 31,

Notes

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

(restated)

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

19

275

299

166

Restricted cash

19

1

4

4

Other short-term financial assets

20

232

90

155

Accounts receivable

21

415

237

225

Inventories

22

202

134

128

Prepayments and other current assets

23

330

185

160

Total current assets

1,455

949

838

Non-current assets:

Property, plant and equipment

24

5,330

2,629

2,371

Intangible assets

25

37

19

22

Other long-term financial assets

26

40

24

34

Investments in joint ventures and associates

27

327

186

36

Bank loans granted

12

13

13

Deferred tax assets

16

14

4

4

Goodwill

25

164

144

142

Other non-current non-financial assets

28

12

3

3

Total non-current assets

5,936

3,022

2,625

Assets held for sale

7

147

-

-

Total assets

7,538

3,971

3,463

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

29

488

211

190

Loans and borrowings

30

684

143

165

Finance lease liabilities

30

4

3

1

Liabilities related to derivative instruments

31

6

-

4

Income tax liabilities

16

11

7

3

Other tax liabilities

32

161

83

73

Provisions

33

22

5

6

Other current liabilities

11

1

1

Total current liabilities

1,387

453

443

Non-current liabilities:

Loans and borrowings

30

1,676

837

596

Finance lease liabilities

30

8

8

5

Deferred tax liabilities

16

660

264

241

Provisions

33

116

71

60

Prepayment on oil supply agreements

34

470

-

-

Other non-current liabilities

35

28

16

14

Total non-current liabilities

2,958

1,196

916

Liabilities associated with assets held for sale

7

28

-

-

Equity:

Share capital

37

1

1

1

Treasury shares

37

-

(299)

(224)

Additional paid-in capital

37

477

385

386

Other funds and reserves

(14)

(6)

(5)

Retained earnings

2,662

2,202

1,910

Rosneft shareholders' equity

3,126

2,283

2,068

Non-controlling interests

17

39

39

36

Total equity

3,165

2,322

2,104

Total liabilities and equity

7,538

3,971

3,463

 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

 

(in billions of Russian rubles, except earnings per share data, and share amounts) 

 

For the years ended December 31,

Notes

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

(restated)

Revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

Oil and gas sales

8

2,428

1,526

1,392

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

8

2,196

1,498

1,265

Support services and other revenues

58

42

45

Equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

27

12

23

16

Total revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

4,694

3,089

2,718

Costs and expenses

Production and operating expenses

389

247

189

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

432

319

298

General and administrative expenses

111

68

52

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

392

241

216

Exploration expenses

17

23

13

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

24, 25

392

206

193

Taxes other than income tax

9

1,024

672

498

Export customs duty

10

1,382

901

790

Total costs and expenses

4,139

2,677

2,249

Operating income

555

412

469

Finance income

11

21

24

20

Finance expenses

12

(56)

(15)

(19)

Other income

13

242

87

25

Other expenses

13

(59)

(50)

(48)

Foreign exchange differences

(71)

11

(22)

Income before income tax

632

469

425

Income tax expense

16

(81)

(104)

(90)

Net income

551

365

335

Other comprehensive (loss)/income - to be reclassified to (loss)/profit in subsequent periods

Foreign exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

(11)

2

(1)

Gain/(loss) from changes in fair value of financial assets available-for-sale, net of tax

3

(3)

1

Total other comprehensive loss - to be reclassified to (loss)/profit in subsequent periods, net of tax

(8)

(1)

-

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

543

364

335

Net income

attributable to Rosneft shareholders

545

363

331

attributable to non-controlling interests

6

2

4

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

attributable to Rosneft shareholders

537

362

331

attributable to non-controlling interests

6

2

4

Net income attributable to Rosneft per common share (in RUB) - basic and diluted

18

52.89

38.55

34.51

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding (millions)

10,304

9,416

9,591

 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

 

(in billions of Russian rubles, except share amounts)

 

Numberof shares

(millions)

Share

capital

Additional paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Other reserves

Retained earnings

Total shareholders' equity

Non-controlling interests

Total

equity

 

Balance at January 1, 2012

9,588

1

386

(224)

(5)

1,877

2,035

34

2,069

 

Effect of changes in accounting policies(Note 3)

-

-

-

-

-

33

33

2

35

 

Balance at January 1, 2012 (restated)

9,588

1

386

(224)

(5)

1,910

2,068

36

2,104

 

 

Net income for the year

-

-

-

-

-

363

363

2

365

 

Other comprehensive income

-

-

-

-

(1)

-

(1)

-

(1)

 

Total comprehensive income

-

-

-

-

(1)

363

362

2

364

 

Purchase of treasury shares (Notes 7, 37)

(350)

-

-

(75)

-

-

(75)

-

(75)

 

Dividends declared on common stock (Note 37)

-

-

-

-

-

(71)

(71)

-

(71)

 

Change in ownership interests in subsidiaries (Note 37)

-

-

(1)

-

-

-

(1)

1

-

 

Balance at December 31, 2012 (restated)

9,238

1

385

(299)

(6)

2,202

2,283

39

2,322

 

 

Net income for the year

-

-

-

-

-

545

545

6

551

 

Other comprehensive income

-

-

-

-

(8)

-

(8)

-

(8)

 

Total comprehensive income

-

-

-

-

(8)

545

537

6

543

 

Sale of treasury shares (Notes 7, 37)

1,360

 -

28

299

-

-

327

-

327

 

Dividends declaredon common stock (Note 37)

-

-

-

-

-

(85)

(85)

-

(85)

 

 

Acquisition of subsidiaries (Note 7)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

114

114

 

Sale of 9.99% of OJSC RN Holding shares (Note 37)

-

-

(125)

-

-

-

(125)

224

99

 

Voluntary offer to acquire OJSC RN Holding shares (Note 37)

-

-

189

-

-

-

189

(342)

(153)

Other

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(2)

(2)

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

10,598

1

477

-

(14)

2,662

3,126

39

3,165

 

 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

 

(in billions of Russian rubles)

 

For the years ended December 31,

 

Notes

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

(restated)

 

Operating activities

 

Net income

551

365

335

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

24,25

392

206

193

 

 

Loss on disposal of non-current assets

13

13

9

19

 

Impairment of assets

13

9

10

4

 

Non-cash income from acquisition of subsidiaries, net

7, 13

(205)

(82)

-

 

Loss from assets and liabilities write-off, net

(1)

(24)

 

Dry hole costs

5

3

4

 

Foreign exchange loss/(gain)

94

(30)

31

Equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

27

(12)

(23)

(16)

 

 

Loss from disposal of subsidiaries and non-production assets

13

5

11

10

 

Finance expenses

12

56

15

19

Finance income

11

(21)

(24)

(20)

 

Interest paid on long-term prepayment on oil supply agreements

(5)

 

Income tax expense

16

81

104

90

 

 

Gain on notes write off

30

(32)

 

(Gain)/loss on bad debt allowance

(1)

3

2

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

Increase in accounts receivable, gross

(112)

(15)

(88)

 

 

Increase in inventories

(7)

(6)

(61)

 

Decrease/(increase) in restricted cash

8

(3)

 

Increase in prepayments and other current assets

(59)

(22)

(15)

 

Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

33

55

82

Increase in other tax liabilities

16

8

20

 

Increase/(decrease) in current provisions

11

(1)

1

 

Increase/(decrease) in other current liabilities

3

(6)

(4)

 

 

Increase/(decrease) in other non-current liabilities

4

3

(10)

 

Increase in long-term prepayment on oil supply agreements

470

 

Long-term loans granted by subsidiary banks

(24)

(33)

(53)

 

Repayment of long-term loans granted by subsidiary banks

25

33

48

Acquisition of trading securities

(22)

(53)

(64)

 

Proceeds from sale of trading securities

21

57

68

 

Net cash provided by operating activities before income tax and interest

1,297

586

568

 

 

Income tax payments

(91)

(76)

(102)

 

 

Interest received

7

10

13

 

Dividends received

1

8

Net cash provided by operating activities

1,213

521

487

 

 

For the years ended December 31,

 

Notes

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

(restated)

 

Investing activities

 

Capital expenditures

(560)

(473)

(391)

 

 

Acquisition of licenses

(12)

(4)

(7)

 

Acquisition of rights to use trademarks "Sochi 2014"

(1)

(1)

(1)

 

Acquisition of short-term financial assets

(237)

(118)

(134)

 

Proceeds from sale of short-term financial assets

77

162

197

 

Acquisition of long-term financial assets

(9)

(3)

(5)

 

Proceeds from sale of long-term financial assets

1

6

 

Acquisition of interest in joint ventures and associates

27

(76)

(43)

(47)

 

Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired

7

(1,407)

(4)

 

Sale of property, plant and equipment

5

4

2

Placements under reverse REPO agreements

(7)

(15)

(31)

 

Receipts under reverse REPO agreements

6

37

23

 

Net cash used in investing activities

(2,220)

(452)

(394)

 

 

Financing activities

 

 

Proceeds from short-term loans and borrowings

30

96

55

25

 

Repayment of short-term loans and borrowings

(24)

(39)

(17)

 

Proceeds from long-term loans and borrowings

30

1,103

351

124

 

Repayment of long-term loans and borrowings

(254)

(137)

(123)

 

Proceeds from bonds issuance

30

110

20

 

Repayment of other financial liabilities

(12)

 

Proceeds from sale of subsidiaries stock

37

97

 

Acquisition of treasury stock

(75)

(3)

 

Acquisition of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries

(2)

(11)

 

Dividends paid to shareholders

(85)

(71)

(27)

 

Interest paid

(63)

(29)

(24)

Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities

968

73

(56)

 

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

(39)

142

37

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

19

299

166

127

 

Effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents

15

(9)

2

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

19

275

299

166

 

1. General

 

Open Joint Stock Company ("OJSC") Rosneft Oil Company ("Rosneft") and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") are principally engaged in exploration, development, production and sale of crude oil and gas and refining, transportation and sale of petroleum products in the Russian Federation and in certain international markets.

 

Rosneft State Enterprise was incorporated as an open joint stock company on December 7, 1995. All assets and liabilities previously managed by Rosneft State Enterprise were transferred to the Company at their book value effective on that date together with the Government of the Russian Federation (the "State") ownership in other privatized oil and gas companies. The transfer of assets and liabilities was made in accordance with Russian Government Resolution No. 971 dated September 29, 1995, On the Transformation of Rosneft State Enterprise into an Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Rosneft". Such transfers represented a reorganization of assets under the common control of the State and, accordingly, were accounted for at their book value. In 2005, the State contributed the shares of Rosneft to the share capital of OJSC ROSNEFTEGAS. As of December 31, 2005, 100% of the shares of Rosneft less one share were owned by OJSC ROSNEFTEGAS and one share was owned by the Russian Federation Federal Agency for the Management of Federal Property. Subsequently, OJSC ROSNEFTEGAS' ownership interest decreased through additional issuance of shares during Rosneft's Initial Public Offering ("IPO") in Russia, issuance of Global Depository Receipts ("GDR") for the shares on London Stock Exchange and the share swap realized during the merger of Rosneft and certain subsidiaries during 2006. In March 2013 in the course of TNK-BP acquisition (Note 7), OJSC ROSNEFTEGAS sold 5.66% of Rosneft shares to BP plc. ("BP"). As of December 31, 2013 OJSC ROSNEFTEGAS' ownership interest in Rosneft was 69.50%.

 

Under Russian legislation, natural resources, including oil, gas, precious metals and minerals and other commercial minerals situated in the territory of the Russian Federation are the property of the State until they are extracted. Law of the Russian Federation No. 2395-1, On Subsurface Resources, regulates relations arising in connection with the geological study, and the use and protection of subsurface resources in the territory of the Russian Federation. Pursuant to the law, subsurface resources may be developed only on the basis of a license. A license is issued by the regional governmental body and contains information on the site to be developed, the period of activity, as well as financial and other conditions. The Company holds licenses issued by competent authorities for geological studies, exploration and development of oil and gas blocks, fields, and shelf in areas where its subsidiaries are located.

 

The Company is subject to export quotas set by the Russian Federation State Pipeline Commission to allow equal access to the limited capacity of oil pipeline system owned and operated by OJSC AK Transneft. The Company exports certain quantities of crude oil bypassing OJSC AK Transneft system thus achieving higher export capacity. The remaining production is processed at the Company's and third parties' refineries for further sale on domestic and international markets.

 

2. Basis of preparation

 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, including all International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and Interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") and effective in the reporting period, and are fully compliant therewith.

 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except certain financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value (Note 38).

 

Rosneft and its subsidiaries maintain their books and records in accordance with statutory accounting and taxation principles and practices applicable in respective jurisdictions. These consolidated financial statements were derived from the Company's statutory books and records.

 

The Company's consolidated financial statements are presented in billions of Russian rubles ("RUB"), unless otherwise indicated.

 

The consolidated financial statements were approved and authorized for issue by the President of the Company on February 4, 2014.

 

Subsequent events have been evaluated through February 4, 2014, the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

 

3. Significant accounting policies

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements differ from the financial statements issued for statutory purposes in that they reflect certain adjustments, not recorded in the Company's statutory books, which are appropriate to present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with IFRS. The principal adjustments relate to: (1) recognition of certain expenses; (2) valuation and depreciation of property, plant and equipment; (3) deferred income taxes; (4) valuation allowances for unrecoverable assets; (5) accounting for the time value of money; (6) accounting for investments in oil and gas property and conveyances; (7) consolidation principles; (8) recognition and disclosure of guarantees, contingencies, commitments and certain assets and liabilities; (9) business combinations and goodwill; (10) accounting for derivative instruments; (11) purchase price allocation to the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed.

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of majority-owned, controlled subsidiaries and special-purpose entities where the Company holds a beneficial interest. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The equity method is used to account for investments in associates in which the Company has the ability to exert significant influence over the associates' operating and financial policies. The investments in entities where the Company holds the majority of shares, but does not exercise control, are also accounted for using the equity method. Investments in other companies are accounted for at fair value or cost adjusted for impairment, if any.

 

Business combinations, goodwill and other intangible assets

 

Acquisitions by the Company of controlling interests in third parties (or interest in their charter capital) are accounted for using the acquisition method.

 

Acquisition date is the date when effective control over the acquiree passes to the Company.

 

The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred, measured at acquisition date fair value and the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. For each business combination, the Company elects whether it measures the non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. Acquisition costs incurred are expensed and included in administrative expenses.

 

Business combinations, goodwill and other intangible assets (continued)

 

Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer will be recognized at fair value at the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration which is deemed to be an asset or liability, will be recognized in accordance with IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, either in profit or loss or as a change to other comprehensive income. If the contingent consideration is classified as equity, it will not be remeasured.

 

Goodwill is initially measured at cost being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the amount recognized for non-controlling interest over the fair value of net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If this consideration is lower than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognized in profit or loss.

 

Associates

 

Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method unless they are classified as non-current assets held for sale. Under this method, the carrying value of investments in associates is initially recognized at the acquisition cost.

 

The carrying value of investments in associates is increased or decreased by the Company's reported share in profit or loss and other comprehensive income of the investee after the acquisition date. The Company's share in profit or loss and other comprehensive income of an associate is recognized in the Company's consolidated statement of comprehensive income as profit or loss and other comprehensive income, respectively. Dividends paid by the associate are accounted for as a reduction of the carrying value of investments.

 

The Company's net investment in associates includes the carrying value of the investment in these associates as well as other long-term investments that are, in substance, investments in associates, such as loans. If the share in losses exceeds the carrying value of the investment in associates and the value of other long-term investments related to investments in these associates, the Company ceases to recognize its share in losses when the carrying value reaches zero. Any additional losses are provided for and liabilities are recognized only to the extent that the Company has legal or constructive obligations or has made payments on behalf of the associate.

 

If the associate subsequently makes profits, the Company resumes recognizing its share in these profits only after its share of the profits equals the share of losses not recognized.

 

The carrying value of investments in associates is tested for impairment by reconciling its recoverable amount (the higher of its value in use and fair value less costs to sell) to its carrying value, whenever impairment indicators are identified.

 

Joint arrangements

 

The Company participates in joint arrangements either in the form of joint ventures or joint operations.

 

A joint venture implies that the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement. A joint venture involves establishing a legal entity where the Company and other participants have respective equity interests. Equity interests in joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method.

 

The Company's share in net profit or loss of joint ventures is recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as profit or loss from the date that joint control commences until the date that joint control ceases.

 

A joint operation implies that the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the arrangement. In relation to its interest in a joint operation the Company recognizes its assets, including its share of any assets held jointly, its liabilities, including its share of any liabilities incurred jointly, its revenue from the sale of its share of the output arising from the joint operation, its share of the revenue from the sale of the output by the joint operation, its expenses, including its share of any expenses incurred jointly.

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

Cash represents cash on hand, in the Company's bank accounts, in transit and interest bearing deposits which can be effectively withdrawn at any time without prior notice or penalties reducing the principal amount of the deposit. Cash equivalents are highly liquid, short-term investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have original maturities of three months or less from their date of purchase. They are carried at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value. Restricted cash is presented separately in the consolidated balance sheet if its amount is significant.

 

Financial assets

 

The Company recognizes financial assets on its balance sheet when, and only when, it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the financial instrument. When financial assets are recognized initially, they are measured at fair value, which is usually the price of the transaction, i.e. the fair value of consideration paid or received.

 

When financial assets are recognized initially, they are classified as following: (1) financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, (2) loans issued and accounts receivable, (3) financial assets held to maturity, (4) financial assets available for sale, as appropriate.

 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss include financial assets held for trading and financial assets designated as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss at initial recognition. Financial assets held for trading are those which are acquired principally for the purpose of sale or repurchase in the near future or are part of a portfolio of identifiable financial instruments that have been commonly managed and for which there is evidence of a recent pattern of actual short term profit taking, or which are derivative instruments (unless the derivative instrument is defined as an effective hedging instrument). Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are classified in the consolidated balance sheet as current assets and changes in the fair value are recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as Finance income or Finance expenses.

 

All derivative instruments are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value in either current financial assets, non-current financial assets, current liabilities related to derivative instruments, non-current liabilities related to derivative instruments. Recognition and classification of a gain or loss that results from recognition of an adjustment of a derivative instrument at fair value depends on the purpose for issuing or holding the derivative instrument. Gains and losses from derivatives that are not accounted for as hedges under International Accounting Standard ("IAS") 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, are recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Subsequent to initial recognition, the fair value of financial assets at fair value that are quoted in an active market is defined as bid prices for assets and ask prices for issued liabilities as of the measurement date.

 

If no active market exists for financial assets, the Company measures the fair value using the following methods:

analysis of recent transactions with peer instruments between independent parties;

current fair value of similar financial instruments;

discounting future cash flows.

 

The discount rate reflects a minimum return on investment an investor is willing to accept before starting an alternative project, given its risk and the opportunity cost of forgoing other projects.

 

Loans issued and accounts receivable include non-derivative financial instruments with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market, not classified as financial assets held for trading and have not been designated as at fair value through profit or loss or available for sale. If the Company cannot recover all of its initial investment in the financial asset due to reasons other than deterioration of its quality, the financial asset is not included in this category. After initial recognition, loans issued and accounts receivable are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method ("EIR"), less impairment losses. The EIR amortization is included in Finance income in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. The losses arising from impairment are recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income in Finance expenses.

 

The Company does not classify financial assets as held to maturity if, during either the current financial year or the two preceding financial years, the Company has sold, transferred or exercised a put option on more than an insignificant (in relation to the total) amount of such investments before maturity unless: (1) such financial asset was close enough to maturity or call date so that changes in the market rate of interest did not have a significant effect on the financial asset's fair value; (2) after substantially all of the financial asset's original principal had been collected through scheduled payments or prepayments; or (3) due to an isolated non-recurring event that is beyond the Company's control and could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Company.

 

Dividends and interest income are recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income on an accrual basis. The amount of accrued interest income is calculated using effective interest rate.

 

All other financial assets not included in the other categories are designated as financial assets available for sale. Specifically, shares of other companies not included in the first category are designated as available for sale. In addition, the Company may include any financial asset in this category at the initial recognition.

 

Financial liabilities

 

The Company recognizes financial liabilities on its balance sheet when, and only when, it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the financial instrument. When financial liabilities are recognized initially, they are measured at fair value, which is usually the price of the transaction, i.e. the fair value of consideration paid or received.

 

When financial liabilities are recognized initially, they are classified as following:

financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss;

other financial liabilities.

 

Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are financial liabilities held for trading unless such liabilities are linked to delivery of unquoted equity instruments.

 

At the initial recognition, the Company may include in this category any financial liability, except equity instruments that are not quoted in an active market and whose fair value cannot be reliably measured. However, subsequent to initial recognition, the liability cannot be reclassified.

 

Financial liabilities not classified as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are designated as other financial liabilities. Other financial liabilities include, inter alia, trade and other accounts payable, loans and borrowings payable.

 

Subsequent to initial recognition, financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in profit or loss in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Other financial liabilities are carried at amortized cost.

 

The Company writes off a financial liability (or a part of a financial liability) from its balance sheet when, and only when, it is extinguished - i.e. when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged or cancelled or expires. The difference between the carrying value of a financial liability (or a part of a financial liability) extinguished or transferred to another party and the redemption value, including any transferred non-monetary assets and assumed liabilities, is recognized in profit or loss. Any previously recognized components of other comprehensive income pertaining to this financial liability are also included in the financial result and are recognized as gains and losses for the period.

 

Earnings per share

 

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the corresponding period. In the absence of any securities-to-shares conversion transactions, the amount of basic earnings per share stated in these consolidated financial statements is equal to the amount of diluted earnings per share.

 

Inventories

 

Inventories consisting primarily of crude oil, petroleum products, petrochemicals and materials and supplies are accounted for at the weighted average cost unless net realisable value is less than cost. Materials that are used in the production are not written down below cost if the finished products in which they will be incorporated are expected to be sold above cost.

 

Repurchase and resale agreements

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase ("REPO") and securities purchased under agreements to resell ("reverse REPO") generally do not constitute a sale for accounting purposes of the underlying securities, and so are treated as collateralized financing transactions. Interest paid or received on all REPO and reverse REPO transactions is recorded in Finance expense or Finance income, respectively, at the contractually specified rate using the effective interest method.

 

Exploration and Production assets

 

Exploration and Production assets include exploration and evaluation assets, mineral rights and oil and gas properties (development assets and production assets).

 

Exploration and evaluation costs

 

The Company recognizes exploration and evaluation costs using the successful efforts method as permitted by IFRS 6, Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources. Under this method, all costs related to exploration and evaluation (license acquisition costs, exploration and appraisal drilling) are temporarily capitalized in cost centers by field (well) until the drilling program results in discovering economically feasible oil and gas reserves.

 

The length of time necessary for this determination depends on the specific technical or economic difficulties in assessing the recoverability of the reserves. If a determination is made that the well did not encounter oil and gas in economically viable quantities, the well costs are expensed to Exploration expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

Exploration and evaluation costs, except for costs associated with seismic, topographical, geological, geophysical surveys, are initially capitalized as exploration and evaluation assets. Exploration and evaluation assets are recognized at cost less impairment, if any, as property, plant and equipment until the existence (or absence) of commercial reserves has been established. Initial cost of exploration and evaluation assets acquired through a business combination is formed as a result of purchase price allocation. The cost allocation to mineral rights to proved properties and mineral rights to unproved properties is performed based on the respective oil and gas reserve information. Exploration and evaluation assets are subject to technical, commercial and management review as well as review for indicators of impairment at least once a year. This is to confirm the continued intent to develop or otherwise extract value from the discovery. When indicators of impairment are present, impairment test is performed.

 

If subsequently commercial reserves are discovered, the carrying value, less losses from impairment of respective exploration and evaluation assets, is classified as oil and gas properties (development assets). However, if no commercial reserves are discovered, such costs are expensed after exploration and evaluation activities have been completed.

 

Development and production

 

Oil and gas properties (development assets) are accounted for on a field-by-field basis and represent (1) capitalized costs to develop discovered commercial reserves and to put fields into production, and (2) exploration and evaluation costs incurred to discover commercial reserves reclassified from exploration and evaluation assets to oil and gas properties (development assets) following discovery of commercial reserves.

 

Oil and gas properties (development assets) costs include the expenditures to acquire such assets, directly identifiable overhead expenses, capitalized financing costs and related asset retirement (decommissioning) obligation costs. Oil and gas properties (development assets) are generally recognized as construction in progress.

 

Following commencement of commercial production, oil and gas properties (development assets) are reclassified as oil and gas properties (production assets).

 

Other property, plant and equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost as of the acquisition date, except for property, plant and equipment acquired prior to January 1, 2009, which is stated at deemed cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairment. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of property is charged to operating expenses. Renewals and betterments of assets are capitalized.

 

Upon sale or retirement of property, plant and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts. Any resulting gains or losses are included in profit or loss.

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

Oil and gas properties are depleted using unit-of-production method on field-by-field basis starting from the commencement of commercial production.

 

In applying the unit-of-production method to mineral licenses, the depletion rate is based on total proved reserves. In applying the unit-of-production method to other oil and gas properties, the depletion rate is based on proved developed reserves.

 

Other property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight line method over their estimated useful lives from the time they are ready for use, except for catalysts which are amortized using the unit-of-production method.

 

Components of other property, plant and equipment and respective estimated useful life are as follows:

 

Buildings and structures

30-45 years

Plant and machinery

5-25 years

Vehicles and other property, plant and equipment

6-10 years

Service vessels

20 years

Offshore drilling assets

20 years

 

Land generally has an indefinite useful life and, thus, is not depreciated.

 

Land leasehold rights are amortized on a straight line basis over their expected useful life, which averages 20 years.

 

Construction grants

 

The Company recognizes construction grants from local governments when there is reasonable assurance that the Company will comply with the conditions attached and that the grant will be received. The construction grants are accounted for as a reduction of the cost of the asset for which the grant is received.

 

Impairment of non-current assets

 

The Company assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is any indication that an asset or cash-generating unit may be impaired. If any such indication exists, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the asset or cash-generating unit.

 

In assessing whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired, the Company considersinternal and external sources of information. It considers at least the following:

External sources of information:

during the period, an asset's market value has declined significantly more than would be expected as a result of the passage of time or normal use;

significant changes with an adverse effect on the Company have taken place during the period, or will take place in the near future, in the technological, market, economic or legal environment in which the Company or in the market to which an asset is dedicated;

market interest rates or other market rates of return on investments have increased during the period, and those increases are likely to affect the discount rate used in calculating an asset's value in use and decrease the asset's recoverable amount materially;

the carrying amount of the net assets of the Company is more than its market capitalization.

Internal sources of information:

evidence is available of obsolescence or physical damage of an asset;

significant changes with an adverse effect on the Company have taken place during the period, or are expected to take place in the near future, in the extent to which, or manner in which, an asset is used or is expected to be used (e.g., the asset becoming idle and reassessing the useful life of an asset as finite rather than indefinite);

information on dividends from a subsidiary, joint venture or associate;

evidence is available from internal reporting that indicates that the economic performance of an asset is, or will be, worse than expected. Such evidence includes the existence of:

cash flows for acquiring the asset, or subsequent cash needs for operating or maintaining it, that are significantly higher than those originally budgeted;

actual net cash flows or operating profit or loss flowing from the asset that are significantly worse than those budgeted;

a significant decline in budgeted net cash flows or operating profit, or a significant increase in budgeted loss, flowing from the asset;

operating losses or net cash outflows for the asset, when current period amounts are aggregated with budgeted amounts for the future.

 

The following factors indicate that exploration and evaluation assets may be impaired:

the period for which the Company has the right to explore in the specific area has expired during the period or will expire in the near future, and is not expected to be renewed;

substantive expenditure on further exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area is neither budgeted nor planned;

exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area have not led to the discovery of commercially viable quantities of mineral resources and the Company has decided to discontinue such activities in the specific area;

sufficient data exist to indicate that, although a development in the specific area is likely to proceed, the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation asset is unlikely to be recovered in full from successful development or by sale.

 

The recoverable amount of an asset or a cash-generating unit is the higher of:

value in use of an asset (cash-generating unit) and

fair value of an asset (cash-generating unit) less costs to sell.

 

If the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets, its recoverable amount is determined for the asset's cash-generating unit.

 

The Company initially measures the value in use of a cash-generating unit. When the carrying amount of a cash-generating unit is greater than its value in use, the Company measures the unit's fair value for the purpose of measuring the recoverable amount. When the fair value is less than the carrying value impairment loss is recognized.

 

Value in use is determined by discounting the estimated value of the future cash inflows expected to be derived from the asset or cash-generating unit, including cash inflows from its sale. The value of the future cash inflows from a cash-generating unit is determined based on the forecast approved by management of the business unit to which the unit in question pertains.

 

Impairment of financial assets

 

At each balance sheet date the Company analyzes whether there is objective evidence of impairment for all categories of financial assets, except those recorded at fair value through profit or loss. A financial asset or a group of financial assets is deemed to be impaired if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that has occurred since the initial recognition of the asset (an incurred 'loss event') and that loss event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or the group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. Evidence of impairment may include (but not limited to) indications that the debtors or a group of debtors is experiencing financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or principal payments, the probability that they will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization and observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows, such as changes in arrears or economic conditions that correlate with defaults.

 

Capitalized interest

 

Interest expense related to the use of borrowed funds used for capital construction projects and acquisition of property, plant and equipment is capitalized provided that such interest expense could have been avoided if the Company had not made capital investments. Interest is capitalized only during the period when construction activities are actually in progress and until the resulting properties are put into operation.

 

Leasing agreements

 

Leases, which transfer to the Company substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the asset, are classified as financial lease and are capitalized at the commencement of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if it is lower than the cost, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance expenses and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liabilities. Finance expenses are charged directly to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

Leased property, plant and equipment are accounted for using the same policies as applied to the Company's own assets. In determining the useful life of a leased item of property, plant and equipment, consideration is given to the probability of transfer of title to the lessee at the end of the lease term.

 

If there is no reasonable certainty that the lessee will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term, the asset shall be fully depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and its useful life. Where such certainty exists, the asset is depreciated over its useful life.

 

Leases where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the assets are classified as operating leases. Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

 

Asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations

 

The Company has asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations associated with its core business activities. The nature of the assets and potential obligations are as follows:

 

The Company's exploration, development and production activities involve the use of wells, related equipment and operating sites, oil gathering and treatment facilities, tank farms and in-field pipelines. Generally, licenses and other regulatory acts require that such assets be decommissioned upon the completion of production. According to these requirements, the Company is obliged to decommission wells, dismantle equipment, restore the sites and perform other related activities. The Company's estimates of these obligations are based on current regulatory or license requirements, as well as actual dismantling and other related costs. These liabilities are measured by the Company using the present value of the estimated future costs of decommissioning of these assets. The discount rate is reviewed at each reporting date and reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability.

 

In accordance with IFRS Interpretations Committee ("IFRIC") 1 Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities, the provision is reviewed at each balance sheet date as follows:

upon changes in the estimates of future cash flows (e.g., the costs of and timeframe for abandoning one well) or a discounting rate, changes in the amount of the liability are included in the cost of the item of plant, property and equipment, whereby such cost may not be negative and may not exceed the recoverable value of the item of plant, property and equipment;

any changes in the liability due to its nearing maturity (change in the discount) are recognized in Finance expenses.

 

The Company's refining and distribution activities involve refining operations, marine and other distribution terminals, and retail sales. The Company's refining operations consist of major petrochemical operations and industrial complexes. Legal or contractual asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations related to petrochemical, oil refining and distribution activities are not recognized due to the limited history of such activities in these segments, the lack of clear legal requirements as to the recognition of obligations, as well as the fact that decommissioning period for such assets are not determinable.

 

Because of the reasons described above the fair value of an asset retirement (decommissioning) obligation of the refining and distribution segment cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to continuous changes in the Russian regulatory and legal environment, there could be future changes to the requirements and contingencies associated with the retirement of long-lived assets.

 

Income tax

 

From 2012 Russian tax legislation permits to calculate income taxes on a consolidated basis. Therefore the main subsidiaries of the Company which do not have non-controlling interest were combined into the Consolidated group of taxpayers (Note 41). For subsidiaries which are not included to the Consolidated group of taxpayers income taxes were calculated on an individual subsidiary basis. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in the amount determined by the Company in accordance with IAS 12, Income Taxes.

 

Deferred tax is provided using the liability method on temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

 

A deferred tax liability is recognized for all taxable temporary differences, except to the extent that the deferred tax liability arises from:

the initial recognition of goodwill;

the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction which:

is not a business combination; and

affects neither accounting profit, nor taxable profit;

the investments in subsidiaries when the Company is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

A prior period tax loss used to reduce the current amount of income tax is recognized as a deferred tax asset.

 

A deferred tax asset is recognized only to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences can be utilized, unless the deferred tax asset arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that:

is not a business combination; and

at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit (tax loss).

 

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets for all deductible temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries and associates, and interests in joint ventures, to the extent that the following two conditions are met:

the temporary difference will reverse in the foreseeable future; and

taxable profit will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities shall be measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.

 

The measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the Company expects, at the end of the reporting period, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.

 

The carrying amount of a deferred tax asset is reviewed at each balance sheet date.

 

The Company reduces the carrying amount of a deferred tax asset to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow the benefit of part or all of that deferred tax asset to be utilized.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as Non-current Deferred tax assets and Non-current Deferred tax liabilities, respectively.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted.

 

Recognition of revenues

 

Revenues are recognized when risks and rewards pass to the customer which usually occurs when the title passes to the customer, providing that the contract price is fixed or determinable and collectability of the receivable is reasonably assured. Specifically, domestic sales of crude oil and gas, as well as petroleum products and materials are usually recognized when title passes. For export sales, title generally passes at the border of the Russian Federation and the Company covers transportation expenses (except freight), duties and taxes on those sales (Note 10). Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable taking into account the amount of any trade discounts, volume rebates and reimbursable taxes.

 

Sales of support services are recognized as services are performed provided that the service price can be determined and no significant uncertainties regarding the receipt of revenues exist.

 

Transportation expenses

 

Transportation expenses recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income represent all expenses incurred by the Company to transport crude oil for refining and to end customers, and to deliver petroleum products from refineries to end customers (these may include pipeline tariffs and any additional railroad transportation costs, handling costs, port fees, sea freight and other costs).

 

Refinery maintenance costs

 

The Company recognizes the costs of overhauls and preventive maintenance performed with respect to oil refining assets as expenses when incurred.

 

Environmental liabilities

 

Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and do not have a future economic benefit, are expensed. Liabilities for these expenditures are recorded when environmental assessments or clean-ups are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.

 

Accounting for contingencies

 

Certain conditions may exist as of the date of these consolidated financial statements which may further result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company's management makes an assessment of such contingent liabilities which is based on assumptions and is a matter of opinion. In assessing loss contingencies relating to legal or tax proceedings that involve the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company, after consultation with legal or tax advisors, evaluates the perceived merits of any legal or tax proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

 

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability is accrued in the Company's consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

 

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the nature of the guarantee would be disclosed. However, in some instances in which disclosure is not otherwise required, the Company may disclose contingent liabilities or other uncertainties of an unusual nature which, in the judgment of management after consultation with its legal or tax counsel, may be of interest to shareholders or others.

 

Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities

 

Refundable excise is deducted from revenues. Non-refundable excise and customs duties are not deducted from revenues and are recognized as expenses in Taxes other than income tax in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

Value-added tax ("VAT") receivable and payable is recognized, respectively, as Prepayments and other current assets and Other tax liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

 

Functional and presentation currency

 

The financial statements are presented in Russian Rubles, which is the functional currency of Rosneft Oil Company and all of its subsidiaries operating in the Russian Federation. A functional currency of the foreign subsidiaries is generally the US dollar.

 

Transactions and balances

 

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the profit or loss.

 

Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates as at the dates of the initial transactions. Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value is determined.

 

The Company's subsidiaries

 

The results and financial position of all of the Company's subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:

assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate at that reporting date;

income and expenses for each statement of comprehensive income are translated at average exchange rates (unless this average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the rate on the dates of the transactions); and

all resulting exchange differences are recognized as a separate component of other comprehensive income.

 

Prepayment on oil supply contracts

 

In the course of business the Company enters into long-term oil supply contracts. The contract terms may require the buyer to make a prepayment.

 

The Company considers long-term oil supply contracts to be a regular way sales entered into and continued to be held for the purpose of the receipt or delivery of a non-financial item in accordance with the Company's expected purchase, sale or usage requirements. A regular way sale contracts are exempted from the scope of IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation, and IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.

 

Conditions to meet the definition of a regular way sale are not met if either of the following applies:

ability to settle net in cash or another financial instrument, or by exchanging financial instruments, is not explicit in the terms of the contract, but the Company has a practice of settling similar contracts net in cash or another financial instrument or by exchanging financial instruments (whether with the counterparty, by entering into offsetting contracts or by selling the contract before its exercise or lapse);

for similar contracts, the Company has a practice of taking delivery of the underlying and selling it within a short period after delivery for the purpose of generating a profit from short-term fluctuations in price or dealer's margin.

 

Prepayments for the delivery of goods or respective deferred revenue are accounted for as non-financial liabilities because the outflow of economic benefits associated with them is the delivery of goods and services rather than a contractual obligation to pay cash or another financial asset.

 

Changes in accounting policies and disclosures

 

The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year except for the adoption of new standards and interpretations effective as of January 1, 2013 and a voluntary change in accounting policy described below.

 

Effective January 1, 2013, the Company voluntarily changed its accounting policy which has an effect on the prior reporting periods. In applying the unit-of-production method to oil and gas properties (excluding mineral licenses), the depletion rate is based on proved developed reserves. Capitalized costs applicable to this category of reserves are included in the depreciable amount to achieve a proper matching of costs and production. In certain cases it is difficult to reliably assign the construction in progress costs to proved developed reserves. For example, if an oil field is not fully developed, there may be construction in progress costs that do not relate, in total or in part, to proved developed reserves. To improve matching of costs and production the Company has decided to exclude the construction in progress costs from the depreciable amounts in applying the unit-of-production method to oil and gas properties. This change was accounted for as a change in accounting policy and applied retrospectively. As a result of this change, Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 decreased RUB 32 billion and RUB 20 billion, respectively. As of December 31, 2012 total cumulative effect from the change in accounting policy was an increase of RUB 59 billion and was recorded in Retained earnings. The effect on Net income attributable to Rosneft per common share (in RUB) - basic and diluted for the year ended December 31, 2012 was an increase of RUB 3.

 

The Company applies, for the first time, certain standards and amendments effective as of January 1, 2013.

 

The nature and the impact of each new standard/amendment are described below.

 

The Company adopted a package of standards on consolidation: IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements, IFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities. The package of new standards introduces the new model of control and treatment of joint arrangements and also new disclosure requirements. As a result of the application of the package the Company has changed its method of accounting for certain joint arrangements from the equity method of accounting to accounting for the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses relating to the Company's interest in accordance with the IFRSs applicable to the particular assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. This change required restatement of financial results for the previous periods.

 

In addition, the application of IFRS 12, Disclosure of Interest in Other Entities, results in additional disclosures in the annual consolidated financial statements.

 

IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement, establishes a single source of guidance under IFRS for all fair value measurements. IFRS 13 does not change when an entity is required to use fair value, but rather provides guidance on how to measure fair value under IFRS when fair value is required or permitted. The application of IFRS 13 has not materially impacted the fair value measurements of the Company. IFRS 13 also requires specific disclosures of fair values. Some of these disclosures are specifically required for the interim condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company made these disclosures in Note 38.

 

IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements. The amendments to IAS 1 introduce a grouping of items presented in other comprehensive income. Items that could be reclassified to profit or loss at a future point in time now have to be presented separately from items that will never be reclassified. The amendment affected presentation only and had no impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

 

Several other new standards and amendments including amended IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosure, and IAS 32, Financial Instrument: Presentation, IAS 19, Employee Benefits (Revised 2011), amendments resulting from Annual Improvements 2009-2011 cycle to IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements, IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment, IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation, IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting, were applied for the first time in 2013. Application of these standards and amendments had no significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

 

The impact of the change from the equity method of accounting to accounting for assets, liabilities, income and expenses in accordance with IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements, in respect of the Company's interests in Ruhr Oel GmbH, a joint operation with BP group, engaged in processing and sale of crude oil in Western Europe, and OJSC Tomskneft VNK ("Tomskneft"), a joint operation with OJSC Gazprom Neft, engaged in crude oil exploration and production in Western Siberia, on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31 and January 1, 2012 and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2012 is presented below.

 

The Company's interests in Ruhr Oel GmbH and Tomskneft are presented using the equity method of accounting in Equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

Impact on the consolidated balance sheet:

 

As of December 31, 2012

As of January 1, 2012

Ruhr OelGmbH

Tomskneft

Total

Ruhr OelGmbH

Tomskneft

Total

Increase in current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

-

3

3

-

-

-

Other financial assets

2

2

4

2

3

5

Accounts receivable

10

-

10

8

-

8

Inventories

1

1

2

1

1

2

Prepayments and other current assets

1

-

1

1

1

2

Increase in total current assets

14

6

20

12

5

17

Increase/(decrease) in non-current assets:

Property, plant and equipment

57

42

99

60

40

100

Investment in Ruhr Oel GmbH

(47)

-

(47)

(46)

-

(46)

Investment in Tomskneft

-

(38)

(38)

-

(34)

(34)

Investments in joint ventures and associates

2

-

2

2

-

2

Deferred tax assets

-

2

2

-

2

2

Goodwill

-

10

10

-

10

10

Increase in total non-current assets

12

16

28

16

18

34

Increase in total assets

26

22

48

28

23

51

Increase in current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

4

1

5

7

2

9

Loans and borrowings

5

12

17

2

11

13

Other tax liabilities

2

4

6

3

4

7

Increase in total current liabilities

11

17

28

12

17

29

Increase in non-current liabilities:

Deferred tax liabilities

4

5

9

4

5

9

Provisions

-

4

4

-

3

3

Other non-current liabilities

13

-

13

12

-

12

Increase in total non-current liabilities

17

9

26

16

8

24

Decrease in equity:

Other funds and reserves

(2)

-

(2)

-

-

-

Retained earnings

-

(4)

(4)

-

(2)

(2)

Decrease in total equity

(2)

(4)

(6)

-

(2)

(2)

Increase in total liabilities and equity

26

22

48

28

23

51

 

Impact on the consolidated statement of comprehensive income:

 

For the year ended December 31, 2012

Ruhr Oel GmbH

Tomskneft

Total

Revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

-

1

1

Equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

-

(8)

(8)

Total revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

-

(7)

(7)

Costs and expenses

Production and operating expenses

15

12

27

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

(19)

(51)

(70)

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

4

7

11

Taxes other than income tax

-

27

27

Total costs and expenses

-

(5)

(5)

Operating loss

-

(2)

(2)

Other income

-

2

2

Income before income tax

-

-

-

Income tax expense

-

(2)

(2)

Net loss

-

(2)

(2)

Other comprehensive loss - to be reclassified to loss in subsequent periods

Foreign exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

(2)

-

(2)

Total other comprehensive loss - to be reclassified to loss in subsequent periods, net of tax

(2)

-

(2)

Total comprehensive loss, net of tax

(2)

(2)

(4)

Net loss

-

(2)

(2)

attributable to Rosneft shareholders

-

(2)

(2)

attributable to non-controlling interests

-

-

-

Total comprehensive loss, net of tax

(2)

(2)

(4)

attributable to Rosneft shareholders

(2)

(2)

(4)

attributable to non-controlling interests

-

-

-

 

Impact on the consolidated statement of cash flows:

 

2012

Net cash provided by operating activities

5

Net cash used in investing activities

(7)

Net cash provided by financing activities

5

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

3

 

4. Significant accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make a number of accounting estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results, however, could differ from those estimates.

 

The most significant accounting estimates and assumptions used by the Company's management in preparing the consolidated financial statements include:

estimation of oil and gas reserves;

estimation of rights to, recoverability and useful lives of non-current assets;

impairment of goodwill (Note 25 "Intangible assets and goodwill");

allowances for doubtful accounts receivable and obsolete and slow-moving inventories (Note 21 "Accounts receivable" and Note 22 "Inventories");

assessment of asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations (Note 3 "Significant accounting policies", Topic "Asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations" and Note 33 "Provisions");

assessment of legal and tax contingencies, recognition and disclosure of contingent liabilities (Note 41 "Contingencies");

assessment of deferred income tax assets and liabilities (Note 3 "Significant accounting policies", Topic "Income tax" and Note 16 "Income tax");

assessment of environmental remediation obligations (Note 33 "Provisions" and Note 41 "Contingencies");

fair value measurements (Note 38 "Fair value of financial instruments");

assessment of ability to renew operating leases and to enter into new lease agreements;

purchase price allocation to the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed (Note 7 «Acquisition of subsidiaries»).

 

Significant estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts are those used in determining the economic recoverability of reserves.

 

The estimated amounts of oil and gas reserves are used in calculating the depletion charges under the unit-of-production method and are made in accordance with the requirements adopted by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Estimates are reassessed on an annual basis.

 

Such estimates and assumptions may change over time when new information becomes available, e.g.:

obtaining more detailed information on reserves (either as a result of more detailed engineering calculations or additional exploration drilling activities);

conducting supplemental activities to enhance oil recovery;

changes in economic estimates and assumptions (e.g. a change in pricing factors).

 

5. New standards and interpretations issued but not yet effective

 

In December 2011, the IASB amended IAS 32, Financial Instrument: Presentation. Amendments clarify assets and liabilities offsetting rules and introduce new related disclosure requirements. The amendments to IAS 32 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The Company will adopt revised IAS 32 from January 1, 2014. The Company does not expect the amendments to have a material impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations.

 

In May 2013, the IASB issued Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets (amendments to IAS 36, Impairment of Assets). The amendments required additional disclosures about the measurement of impaired assets (or a group of assets) with a recoverable amount based on fair value less costs of disposal. The amendments to IAS 36 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The Company will adopt the amendments from January 1, 2014. The Company does not expect the amendments to have a material impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations.

 

In May 2013, the IASB issued Interpretation 21 Levies (IFRIC 21). The interpretation clarifies that an entity recognises a liability for a levy when the activity that triggers payment, as identified by the relevant legislation, occurs. The interpretation is applicable for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The Company will adopt the interpretation from January 1, 2014. The Company does not expect the IFRIC 21 to have a material impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations.

 

In June 2013, the IASB issued Novation of Derivatives and Continuation of Hedge Accounting (Amendments to IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement). Under the amendments there would be no need to discontinue hedge accounting if a hedging derivative was novated, provided certain criteria are met. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The Company will adopt the amendments from January 1, 2014. The Company does not expect the amendments to have a material impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations.

 

In November 2013, the IASB issued a new version of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting and amendments to IFRS 9, IFRS 7 and IAS 39), which includes the new hedge accounting requirements and some related amendments to IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, and IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures. The amendments to IFRS 9 do not have a mandatory effective date, but are available for application now; a new mandatory effective date will be set when the IASB completes project on the accounting for financial instruments. The Company will not adopt the amendments from January 1, 2014.

 

6. Capital and financial risk management

 

Capital management

 

The Company's capital management objectives are to secure the ability to continue as a going concern and to optimize the cost of capital in order to enhance value to shareholders.

 

The Company's management performs regular assessment of the net debt to capital employed ratio to ensure it meets the Company's current rating requirements.

 

The Company's capital consists of debt obligations, which include long and short-term loans and borrowings, certain other current liabilities, equity attributable to equity holders of Rosneft that includes share capital, reserves and retained earnings, as well as non-controlling interest. Net debt is a non-IFRS measure and is calculated as a sum of loans and borrowings as reported in the consolidated balance sheet, plus certain other current liabilities, less cash and cash equivalents and certain temporary investments in short-term financial assets. Net debt to capital employed ratio enables the users to see how significant net debt is relative to capital employed.

 

The Company's net debt to capital employed ratio was as follows:

 

As of December 31,

2013

2012(restated)

Total debt

2,367

980

Cash and cash equivalents

(275)

(299)

Other short-term financial assets

(232)

(90)

Net debt

1,860

591

Total equity

3,165

2,322

Total capital employed

5,025

2,913

Net debt to capital employed ratio, %

37.0%

20.3%

 

Financial risk management

 

In the normal course of business the Company is exposed to the following financial risks: market risk (including foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and commodity price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company has introduced a risk management system and developed a number of procedures to measure, assess and monitor risks and select the relevant risk management techniques.

 

The Company has developed, documented and approved the relevant policies pertaining to market, credit and liquidity risks and the use of derivative financial instruments.

 

Foreign currency risk 

 

The Group undertakes transactions denominated in foreign currencies and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures primarily with respect to the US$ and Euro. Foreign exchange risk arises from assets, liabilities, commercial transactions and financing denominated in foreign currencies.

 

The carrying values of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are presented in the table below:

 

Assets

Liabilities

As of December 31,

As of December 31,

2013

2012

(restated)

2013

2012

(restated)

US$

518

451

(1,966)

(711)

Euro

67

66

(133)

(106)

Total

585

517

(2,099)

(817)

 

The level of currency risk is assessed on a monthly basis using a sensitivity analysis and is maintained within the limits adopted in line with the Company's policy. The table below summarizes the impact on the Company's income before income tax as a result of appreciation/(depreciation) of RUB against the US$ and euro.

 

US$ - effect

Euro - effect

2013

2012

2011

2013

2012

2011

Currency ratechange in %

9.77%

10.72%

12.50%

7.86%

9.49%

11.77%

Gain/(loss)

142/(142)

28/(28)

48/(48)

5/(5)

4/(4)

(1)/1

 

The financial exposure to foreign currency risk of forecasted operating expense is managed as an integral part of the Company's risk management program, which seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effect that the volatility of the exchange rate markets may have on operating results. The Company enters into contracts to economically hedge certain of its risks associated with RUB appreciation (Notes 20, 26, 31). These instruments are not accounted for as accounting hedges pursuant to IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.

 

Interest rate risk

 

Loans and borrowings raised at variable interest rates expose the Company to interest rate risk arising on the possible movement of variable element of the overall interest rate. Such risks are hedged by the Company but the operations are not accounted for as accounting hedges pursuant to IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.

 

As of December 31, 2013, the Company's variable rate liability, based on LIBOR and EURIBOR alone, totaled RUB 1,763 billion (net of interest payable). In 2013 and 2012, variable rate funds raised by the Company were primarily denominated in US$ and Euros.

 

The Company analyses its interest rate exposure, including performing scenario analysis to measure an impact on annual income before income tax of an interest rate shift. The table below summarizes the impact of a potential increase or decrease in LIBOR on the Company's profit before tax, as applied to the variable element of interest rates on loans and borrowings. The increase/decrease is based on management estimates of potential interest rate movements.

 

Increase/decrease in interest rate

Effect on income before income tax

basis points

billion RUB

2013

+6

(1)

-6

1

2012

+5

-

-5

-

2011

+15

(1)

-15

1

 

Potential change in EURIBOR is insignificant.

 

The sensitivity analysis is limited only to variable rate loans and borrowings and is conducted with all other variables held constant. The analysis is prepared assuming the amount of variable rate liability outstanding at the balance sheet date was outstanding for the whole year. Interest rate on variable rate loans and borrowings will effectively change throughout the year in response to fluctuations in market interest rates.

 

The impact measured through the sensitivity analysis does not take into account other potential changes in economic conditions, which may accompany the relevant changes in market interest rates.

 

The Company enters into contracts to economically hedge risks associated with an increasing interest expense on loans and borrowings (Notes 20, 26, 31).

 

Credit risk

 

The Company controls own exposure to credit risk. All external customers and their financial guarantors, other than related parties, undergo a creditworthiness check (including sellers, which act on prepayment basis). The Company performs an ongoing assessment and monitoring of financial position and the risk of default. In the event of default by the parties on their respective obligations under the financial guarantee contracts, the Company's exposure to credit risk will be limited to the corresponding contract amounts. As of December 31, 2013, management assessed such risk as remote.

 

In addition, as part of its cash management and credit risk function, the Company regularly evaluates the creditworthiness of financial and banking institutions where it deposits cash and performs trade finance operations. Banking relationships are primarily with Russian subsidiaries of large international banking institutions and certain large Russian banks. The Company's exposure to credit risk is limited to the carrying amount of financial assets recognized in the consolidated balance sheet.

 

Liquidity risk

 

The Company has mature liquidity risk management processes covering short-term, mid-term and long-term funding. Liquidity risk is controlled through maintaining sufficient reserves and the adequate amount of committed credit facilities and loan funds. Management conducts regular monitoring of projected and actual cash flow information, analyses the repayment schedules of the existing financial assets and liabilities and performs annual detailed budgeting procedures.

 

Contractual maturities of the Company's financial liabilities are presented below:

 

Year ended December 31, 2012 (restated)

On demand

12 months

1 to 5 years

> 5 years

Total

Loans and borrowings

-

112

533

505

1,150

Finance lease liabilities

-

4

6

4

14

Accounts payable to suppliers and contractors

-

117

-

-

117

Salary and other benefits payable

-

22

-

-

22

Banking customer accounts

41

-

-

-

41

Other accounts payable

-

13

-

-

13

Year ended December 31, 2013

On demand

12 months

1 to 5 years

> 5 years

Total

Loans and borrowings

-

721

1,359

556

2,636

Finance lease liabilities

-

5

6

3

14

Accounts payable to suppliers and contractors

-

187

-

-

187

Salary and other benefits payable

-

45

-

-

45

Voluntary offer to acquire OJSC RN Holding securities (Note 37)

153

-

-

-

153

Banking customer accounts

36

-

-

-

36

Other accounts payable

-

22

-

-

22

Derivative financial liabilities

-

6

-

-

6

Part of other current liabilities

-

7

-

-

7

 

Loans and borrowings above exclude certain Yukos related borrowings and promissory notes payable that were carried in the books of the former Yukos subsidiaries the Company acquired through the auctions for the sale of the assets of Yukos. The borrowings and promissory notes payable are being disputed by the Company (Notes 30, 41).

 

7. Acquisition of subsidiaries

 

Acquisition of TNK-BP

 

On March 21, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of an aggregate 100% equity interest in TNK‑BP Limited, the ultimate holding company of TNK-BP, and of its subsidiary TNK Industrial Holdings Limited (collectively, with their subsidiaries referred to "TNK-BP").

 

TNK-BP is a vertically integrated group of companies operating a diversified upstream and downstream portfolio, with assets in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Venezuela, Vietnam and Brazil. TNK-BP was Russia's third largest oil producer. TNK-BP operates in Russia's major hydrocarbon regions, including West Siberia, Volga-Urals and East Siberia.

 

The fair value of consideration paid was RUB 1,767 billion at the acquisition date. The acquisition was effected through two independent transactions with BP and AAR consortium.

 

The consideration transferred is presented below:

BP's 50% equity interest in TNK-BP:

US$16.65 billion in cash at the Central Bank of Russia's ("CBR") official exchange rate as of the date of acquisition

515

1,360,449,797 Rosneft's treasury shares (12.84% of share capital) at fair value

327

AAR's 50% equity interest in TNK-BP:

US$27.73 billion in cash at the CBR official exchange rate as of the date of acquisition

858

Total cash and equity instruments

1,700

Fair value of the Company's investment in OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz

67

Total consideration transferred

1,767

 

The fair value of the Rosneft's treasury shares included in the consideration transferred at TNK-BP acquisition was determined at the closing price of the Rosneft's global depository receipts listed on the London Stock Exchange as of March 21, 2013.

 

As a result of TNK-BP acquisition, the Company's share in OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz increased from 25.94% to the controlling share and was accounted for under IFRS 3, Business Combinations, as a step acquisition. Corresponding revaluation of the Company's non-controlling share in OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz of RUB 38 billion is included in Other income in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2013. Fair value of non-controlling share in OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz of RUB 67 billion is included in the consideration transferred.

 

The acquisition of TNK-BP did not contemplate contingent consideration.

 

In the course of the transaction the following entities were acquired:

Name

Country of incorporation

Core activity

Preferred and common shares

Voting shares

Exploration and production

%

%

OJSC Nizhnevartovskoe Neftegazodobyvayuschee Predpriyatie

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

94.67

96.51

OJSC Varyoganneftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

89.34

90.91

LLC Vanyoganneft JV

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

94.67

96.51

OJSC TNK-Nyagan

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

94.67

96.51

OJSC Tumenneftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

94.67

96.51

OJSC Orenburgneft

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

95.13

96.61

LLC Buguruslanneft

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

95.13

96.61

OJSC Yugraneft Corporation

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

75.30

76.77

OJSC Samotlorneftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

94.67

96.51

OJSC TNK-Nizhnevartovsk

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

94.67

96.51

CJSC ROSPAN INTERNATIONAL

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

94.67

96.51

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

70.05

71.42

LLC TNK-Uvat

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

94.67

96.51

LLC Tagulskoe

Russia

Field survey and exploration

100.00

100.00

OJSC Suzun

Russia

Field survey and exploration

100.00

100.00

TNK Vietnam B.V.

Netherlands

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

Refining, logistics and distribution

LLC Nizhnevartovskoe Neftepererabatyvayuschee Obedinenie

Russia

Petroleum refining

94.67

96.51

CJSC RORC

Russia

Petroleum refining

94.67

96.51

OJSC Saratov Oil Refinery

Russia

Petroleum refining

81.01

87.98

CJSC Karelyanefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

94.67

96.51

LLC Kurskoblnefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

94.67

96.51

OJSC Kaluganefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

93.04

96.51

OJSC Rjazan Oil Produkt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

93.55

96.51

OJSC Tulanefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

87.51

92.29

CJSC PCEC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

94.67

96.51

OJSC TNK-Stolitsa

Russia

Marketing and distribution

94.67

96.51

LLC ZSNP

Russia

Marketing and distribution

94.67

96.51

OJSC Saratovnefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

87.98

90.29

LLC TNK-BP Northern Capital

Russia

Marketing and distribution

94.67

96.51

LLC TNK Lubricants

Russia

Marketing and distribution

97.33

98.25

CJSC TNK South Management

Russia

Marketing and distribution

94.67

96.51

LLC TNK-BP Marketing

Russia

Marketing and distribution

94.67

96.51

OJSC TNK-Yaroslavl

Russia

Marketing and distribution

89.03

90.76

FLLC "TNK-BP West"

Belarus

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

LLC TNK-Industries

Russia

Marketing and distribution

94.67

96.51

CJSC Koltsovo Fueling Company

Russia

Marketing and distribution

94.67

96.51

LLC TZK-Aktiv

Russia

Marketing and distribution

94.67

96.51

PRJSC LINIK

Ukraine

Petroleum refining

95.21

95.21

TNK Trade Limited

Cyprus Republic

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

LLC Krasnoleninsky Oil Refinery

Russia

Petroleum refining

94.67

96.51

Other

TNK Industrial Holdings Limited

Virginia British Isles

Holding company

100.00

100.00

TNK-ВР Limited

Virginia British Isles

Holding company

100.00

100.00

TNK-ВР International Limited

Virginia British Isles

Holding company

100.00

100.00

TNK Pipelines Vietnam B.V.

Netherlands

Transportation services

100.00

100.00

Novy Investments Limited

Cyprus Republic

Holding company

100.00

100.00

TNK Management Company Limited

Cyprus Republic

Holding company

100.00

100.00

OJSC TNK-BP Holding

Russia

Holding company

94.67

96.51

OJSC TNK-ВР Management

Russia

Management company

100.00

100.00

 

During the second and the third quarters 2013 several acquired entities were renamed.

 

As a result of the acquisition, the Company significantly increased its crude oil production and refining capacity, accessed new geographical markets and substantially expanded its retail network. Management believes that the acquisition of TNK-BP places the Company in a leading position globally among public companies operating in the oil and gas sector, reinforces its position as a regional upstream leader in Russia and Europe, creates significant synergies arising from joint development activities, optimization of oil and oil product logistics, production and sales of natural gas together with improving internal controls over costs and assets.

 

The Company accounted for TNK-BP acquisition as a business combination. The Company consolidated the operating result of the acquired business from March 21, 2013, the date the control was obtained.

 

The following table summarizes the Company's allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

 

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

178

Restricted cash

5

Accounts receivable

53

Inventories

60

Prepayments and other current assets

79

Total current assets

375

Non-current assets:

Property, plant and equipment

2,235

Intangible assets

24

Other financial assets

13

Investments in associates and joint ventures

207

Deferred tax assets

9

Other non-current non-financial assets

9

Total non-current assets

2,497

Total assets

2,872

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

117

Loans and borrowings

31

Income tax liabilities

3

Other tax liabilities

61

Provisions

7

Other current liabilities

12

Total current liabilities

231

Non-current liabilities:

Loans and borrowings

203

Deferred tax liabilities

344

Provisions

39

Other non-current liabilities

9

Total non-current liabilities

595

Total liabilities

826

Total identifiable net assets at fair value

2,046

Non-controlling interests measured at fair value

(112)

Gain on bargain purchase

(167)

Total consideration transferred

(1,767)

 

TNK-BP acquisition cash flow:

 

Net cash acquired

178

Cash paid

(1,373)

Net cash outflow

(1,195)

 

The bargain purchase gain, arisen on acquisition of TNK-BP, is a result of the exclusive position of the Company on the Russian market. The Company was the only potential buyer, that was able to offer mainly cash consideration for the business acquired without payment deferrals. Additionally, the Company's bargain power was further enhanced through two separate transactions with BP and AAR consortium to acquire non-controlling 50% ownership share in each transaction.

 

Deferred tax liabilities in the amount of RUB 344 billion are mainly attributable to revaluation of property, plant and equipment.

 

The fair value of the accounts receivable approximates its outstanding contractual amounts at the acquisition date. There are no accounts receivable that are not expected to be collected.

 

Net cash outflow of RUB 1,195 billion was included in Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired in the investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

From March 21, 2013 (the date of acquisition) TNK-BP's revenues and net income included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2013 were RUB 1,551 billion and RUB 107 billion, respectively.

 

Had the TNK-BP acquisition taken place at the beginning of the reporting period (January 1, 2013), revenues and net income of the combined entity would have been RUB 5,069 billion and RUB 582 billion, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

Acquisition of LLC Basic jet fuel operator and LLC General Avia

 

In May 2013, the Company acquired a 100% interest in LLC Basic jet fuel operator and LLC General Avia for a consideration of RUB 6 billion. Main activities of these entities comprise jet fuel sales, storage and fuelling services in airports of Krasnodar, Sochi, Anapa, Gelendzhik and Abakan.

 

The preliminary purchase price allocation of consideration paid for the acquisition of LLC Basic jet fuel operator and LLC General Avia is as follows:

 

ASSETS

Property, plant and equipment

7

Total non-current assets

7

LIABILITIES

Deferred income tax liabilities

1

Total long-term liabilities

1

Total net assets acquired

6

 

Acquisition of LLC Oil and Gas Company ITERA

 

On July 2, 2013 the Company acquired a 49% ownership interest in LLC Oil and Gas Company ITERA, the major independent natural gas producer and supplier in Russia. As a result of this acquisition, the Company's share in LLC Oil and Gas Company ITERA increased to 100%. This acquisition was accounted for as step acquisition under IFRS 3, Business Combinations.

 

Preliminary fair value of the consideration transferred was RUB 191 billion at the acquisition date and included cash in the amount of RUB 95 billion and preliminary fair value of non-controlling share in LLC Oil and Gas Company ITERA of RUB 96 billion.

 

In the course of the transaction the following entities were acquired:

 

 

Name

Country of incorporation

Core activity

Preferred and common shares

Voting shares

Exploration and production

%

%

LLC Kynsko-Chaselskoye neftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

OJSC Bratskekogaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

79.00

79.00

OJSC Sibneftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

48.94

48.94

OJSC Purgaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

49.00

49.00

Refining, marketing and distribution

LLC Sibgastranzit

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

CJSC Uralsevergas

Russia

Marketing and distribution

67.00

67.00

SIA ITERA Latvija

Latvia

Marketing and distribution

66.00

66.00

Other

LLC Oil and Gas Company ITERA

Russia

Holding company

100.00

100.00

LLC Firma Proekt

Russia

Holding company

100.00

100.00

LLC Linko-Optim

Russia

Holding company

100.00

100.00

LLC OVIT

Russia

Holding company

100.00

100.00

LLC ITERA Finance

Russia

Finance services

100.00

100.00

LLC EK ENEKO

Russia

Holding company

100.00

100.00

CJSC Regiongas-Invest

Russia

Heat production

100.00

100.00

OJSC Raschetnij center Urala

Russia

Collecting activity

99.90

99.90

ITERA-Turkmenistan Ltd.

Cyprus

Holding company

100.00

100.00

Davonte Holdings Ltd.

Cyprus

Holding company

100.00

100.00

 

Acquisition of LLC Oil and Gas Company ITERA improves business efficiency and creates new opportunities for its growth. It forms a stable platform for consistent implementation of the Company's gas strategy.

 

The following table summarizes the Company's preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

 

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

1

Accounts receivable

11

Prepayments and other current assets

2

Total current assets

14

Non-current assets:

Property, plant and equipment

92

Other financial assets

4

Investments in associates and joint ventures

128

Deferred tax assets

1

Total non-current assets

225

Total assets

239

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

6

Loans and borrowings

12

Total current liabilities

18

Non-current liabilities:

Loans and borrowings

10

Deferred tax liabilities

19

Total non-current liabilities

29

Total liabilities

47

Total identifiable net assets at fair value

192

Non-controlling interests measured at preliminary fair value

(1)

Total consideration transferred

191

 

This allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is preliminary as of December 31, 2013. Purchase price allocation has not been finalized due to complexity of the acquisition and uncertainties related to fair value measurements of property, plant and equipment, investments and deferred tax liabilities. Allocation of the purchase price to fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed will be finalized within 12 months from the acquisition date.

 

The fair value of accounts receivable approximates its outstanding contractual amounts at the acquisition date. There are no accounts receivable that are not expected to be collected.

 

The acquisition of LLC Oil and Gas Company ITERA did not contemplate contingent consideration.

 

Acquisition of LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo

 

On September 30, 2013 the Company acquired a 50% ownership share in LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo, a 74.9% shareholder of CJSC TZK Sheremetyevo, for a consideration of US$ 300 million (RUB 10 billion at the date of the transaction). As a result of the acquisition, the Company's share in LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo increased to 100%. Main activities of CJSC TZK-Sheremetyevo comprise jet fuel sales, storage and fuelling services at Sheremetyevo International Airport in Moscow.

 

Acquisition of 50% share in LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo was accounted for under IFRS 3, Business Combinations, as a step acquisition. Fair value of previously held non-controlling share in LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo of RUB 9 billion and a loan to LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo from the Company of RUB 5 billion are included in the consideration transferred.

 

Starting from September 30, 2013, assets and liabilities of LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo and CJSC TZK Sheremetyevo are included in the Company's consolidated balance sheet. In October 2013, LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo was renamed to LLC RN-Aero Sheremetyevo. The consideration for the acquisition of a 50% share in LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo was fully paid in October 2013.

 

As of December 31, 2013, LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo purchase price allocation was not completed. Preliminary purchase price allocation is based on a historical value of assets and liabilities. Excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets of LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo acquired is recorded as goodwill. Allocation of the purchase price to fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed will be finalized within 12 months from the acquisition date.

 

The following table summarizes the Company's preliminary allocation of the LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo purchase price:

 

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
3
Accounts receivable
2
Other current assets
1
Total current assets
6
 
Non-current assets:
Property, plant and equipment
3
Other non-current assets
2
Total non-current assets
5
 
Total assets
11
 
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
4
Loans and borrowings
2
Total current liabilities
6
Total liabilities
6
Total identifiable net assets at fair value
5
Non-controlling interests measured at preliminary fair value
(1)
Goodwill
20
Total consideration transferred
 24
 

Preliminarily, goodwill in the amount of RUB 20 billion relates primarily to the expected synergies arising from an access to the premium sales in Moscow International Sheremetyevo Airport, the largest airport in Russia in terms of jet fuel consumption and traffic. The amount of goodwill is not tax deductible.

 

The acquisition of LLC TNK-Sheremetyevo did not contemplate contingent consideration.

 

Acquisition of LLC Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha

 

In October 2013 the Company completed a number of transactions to acquire 65% ownership interest in LLC Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha, increasing its ownership interest to 100%. The Company also acquired the majority of the entity's debt. The total consideration for 65% ownership interest amounted to US$ 3,139 million (RUB 101 billion as of the date of transaction), including entity's debt. LLC Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha holds an exploration license for the Central block of Kurungskoe license field in Srednebotuobinskoe oil and gas condensate deposit.

 

The acquisition of additional 65% ownership interest in LLC Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha was accounted for under IFRS 3, Business Combinations, as a step acquisition. Preliminary fair value of previously held non-controlling share in LLC Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha of RUB 13 billion is included in the preliminary consideration transferred.

 

The following table summarizes the Company's preliminary allocation of the LLC Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha purchase price:

 

ASSETS

Current assets:

Prepayments and other current assets

2

Total current assets

2

Non-current assets:

Property, plant and equipment

34

Mineral rights

105

Total non-current assets

139

Total assets

141

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

4

Total current liabilities

4

Non-current liabilities

Loans and borrowings

1

Deferred tax liabilities

22

Total non-current liabilities

23

Total liabilities

27

Total identifiable net assets at fair value

114

Total consideration transferred

114

 

The acquisition of LLC Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha did not contemplate contingent consideration.

 

The Company plans to sell a share in LLC Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha to within next 12 months. As of December 31, 2013 the assets and liabilities of LLC Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha were classified as assets and liabilities held for sale as follows:

 

ASSETS

Current assets:

Advances issued and other current assets

3

Total current assets

3

Non-current assets:

Property, plant and equipment

39

Mineral licenses

105

Total non-current assets

144

Total assets held for sale

147

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

3

Total current liabilities

3

Non-current liabilities:

Loans and borrowings

3

Deferred tax liabilities

22

Total non-current liabilities

25

Total liabilities associated with assets held for sale

28

 

Acquisition of OJSC Sibneftegas

 

In November 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of 40% ownership interest in Artic Russia B.V. from Enel, an Italian oil and gas company, for a cash consideration of RUB 59 billion. Artic Russia B.V. is a parent company holding a controlling interest in LLC Sever-Energiya, which holds licenses for exploration and production within Samburgskiy license area and for geological study, exploration and production of hydrocarbons within Yevo-Yakhinskiy, Yaro-Yakhinskiy and Severo-Chaselskiy license areas.

 

In December 2013, the Company and OJSC NOVATEK swaped 40% ownership interest in Artic Russia B.V., owned by the Company, for 51% ownership interest in OJSC Sibneftegas, owned by OJSC NOVATEK. The transaction did not involve any cash consideration. Following the swap, the Company accumulated 100% ownership interest in OJSC Sibneftegas. OJSC Sibneftegas holds licenses for hydrocarbon production within Pyreinoye gas condensate field and for geological study, exploration and production of hydrocarbons within Beregovoy and Khadyryakhinskiy license areas.

 

The acquisition of additional 51% share in OJSC Sibneftegas was accounted for under IFRS 3, Business Combinations, as a step acquisition. Preliminary fair value of previously held non-controlling share in OJSC Sibneftegas of RUB 71 billion and is included in the consideration transferred.

 

Starting from December 27, 2013, assets and liabilities OJSC Sibneftegas are included in the Company's consolidated balance sheet.

 

The consideration transferred is presented below:

 

Preliminary fair value of 49% interest in OJSC Sibneftegas, obtained as a result of LLC Oil and Gas Company ITERA acquisition

71

Preliminary fair value of 40% interest in Artic Russia B.V.

59

Total consideration transferred

130

 

The following table summarizes the Company's preliminary allocation of the consideration transferred to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

 

ASSETS:

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

2

Accounts receivable and other current assets

2

Total current assets

4

Non-current assets:

Property, plant and equipment

172

Intangible assets

2

Total non-current assets

174

Total assets

178

LIABILITIES

Non-current liabilities:

Loans and borrowings

15

Deferred tax liabilities

33

Total liabilities

48

Total consideration transferred

130

 

This allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is preliminary as of December 31, 2013. Purchase price allocation has not been finalized due to complexity of the acquisition and uncertainties related to fair value measurements of property, plant and equipment, investments and deferred tax liabilities. Allocation of the purchase price to fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed will be finalized within 12 months from the acquisition date.

 

The acquisition of OJSC Sibneftegas did not contemplate contingent consideration.

 

Acquisition of LLC Research and Development Center

 

In February 2012, the Company acquired for RUB 4 billion 100% interest in LLC Research and Development Center which is engaged in developing advanced technologies for refining and for petrochemical industry.

 

The following table summarizes the Company's purchase price allocation of LLC Research and Development Center to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

 

Property, plant and equipment

1

Intangible assets

2

Total non-current assets

3

Deferred tax liabilities

1

Total non-current liabilities

1

Total identifiable net assets at fair value

2

Goodwill

2

Purchase consideration transferred

4

 

The goodwill of RUB 2 billion relates to the expected synergies arising from the implementation of acquired innovative technologies in refining and petrochemicals. Accordingly, this goodwill was allocated to the Refining and distribution segment.

 

Acquisition of LLC Polar Terminal

 

In June 2012, the Company acquired for RUB 1 billion 100% interest in LLC Polar Terminal. LLC Polar Terminal is engaged in an investment project for construction of crude oil and petroleum products transshipment terminal. Allocation of purchase price to assets, liabilities and result of operations of Polar Terminal LLC are not significant to these consolidated financial statements.

 

8. Segment information

 

The Company determines its operating segments based on the nature of their operations. The performance of these operating segments is assessed by management on a regular basis. Exploration and production segment is engaged in field exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. Refining and distribution segment is engaged in processing crude oil and other hydrocarbons into petroleum products, as well as the purchase, sale and transportation of crude oil and petroleum products. Corporate and other unallocated activities do not represent operating segment and comprise corporate activity, activities involved in field development, maintenance of infrastructure and functioning of the first two segments, as well as banking and finance services, and other activities. Substantially all of the Company's operations and assets are located in the Russian Federation.

 

Segment performance is evaluated based on both revenues and operating income which are measured on the same basis as in the consolidated financial statements, and of revaluation of intersegment transactions at market prices.

 

Operating segments in 2013:

 

Exploration and production

Refining and distribution

Corporate and other unallocated activities

Adjustments

Consolidated

Revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

Revenues from external customers

61

4,570

51

-

4,682

Intersegment revenues

1,848

-

-

(1,848)

-

Equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

12

-

-

-

12

Total revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

1,921

4,570

51

(1,848)

4,694

Costs and expenses

Costs and expenses other than depreciation, depletion and amortization

1,098

4,385

112

(1,848)

3,747

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

329

56

7

-

392

Total costs and expenses

1,427

4,441

119

(1,848)

4,139

Operating income

494

129

(68)

-

555

Finance income

21

Finance expenses

(56)

Total finance expenses

(35)

Other income

242

Other expenses

(59)

Foreign exchange differences

(71)

Income before income tax

632

Income tax

(81)

Net income

551

 

Operating segments in 2012(restated):

 

Exploration and production

Refining and distribution

Corporate and other unallocated activities

Adjustments

Consolidated

Revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

Revenues from external customers

45

2,995

26

-

3,066

Intersegment revenues

1,220

-

-

(1,220)

-

Equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

23

-

-

-

23

Total revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

1,288

2,995

26

(1,220)

3,089

Costs and expenses

Costs and expenses other than depreciation, depletion and amortization

701

2,914

76

(1,220)

2,471

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

167

33

6

-

206

Total costs and expenses

868

2,947

82

(1,220)

2,677

Operating income

420

48

(56)

-

412

Finance income

24

Finance expenses

(15)

Total finance income

9

Other income

87

Other expenses

(50)

Foreign exchange differences

11

Income before income tax

469

Income tax

(104)

Net income

365

 

Operating segments in 2011 (restated):

 

Exploration and production

Refining and distribution

Corporate and other unallocated activities

Adjustments

Consolidated

Revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

Revenues from external customers

50

2,621

31

-

2,702

Intersegment revenues

1,030

-

-

(1,030)

-

Equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

16

-

-

-

16

Total revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

1,096

2,621

31

(1,030)

2,718

Costs and expenses

Costs and expenses other than depreciation, depletion and amortization

534

2,503

49

(1,030)

2,056

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

164

24

5

-

193

Total costs and expenses

698

2,527

54

(1,030)

2,249

Operating income

398

94

(23)

-

469

Finance income

20

Finance expenses

(19)

Total finance income

1

Other income

25

Other expenses

(48)

Foreign exchange differences

(22)

Income before income tax

425

Income tax

(90)

Net income

335

 

Oil and gas and petroleum products sales comprise the following (based on the country indicated in the bill of lading):

 

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

Oil and gas sales

International sales of crude oil - Europe

1,574

1,033

955

International sales of crude oil - Asia

542

388

366

International sales of crude oil - CIS, other than Russia

128

78

54

Domestic sales of crude oil

81

5

3

Sales of gas

103

22

14

Total oil and gas sales

2,428

1,526

1,392

Petroleum products and petrochemical sales

International Sales of petroleum products - Europe

907

653

500

International Sales of petroleum products - Asia

294

228

224

International Sales of petroleum products - CIS, other than Russia

84

11

8

Domestic sales of petroleum products

817

522

473

Domestic sales of petrochemical products

12

11

10

International sales of petrochemical products - Europe

82

73

50

Total petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

2,196

1,498

1,265

 

The Company had one major customer in 2012 and 2011 being an international oil trader accounting for at least 10% of total sales. Revenues generated from sales to this oil trader totaled RUB 384 billion and RUB 547 billion, or 12% and 20% of total revenues, in 2012 and 2011, respectively. These revenues are recognized mainly under the Refining and distribution segment. No customer accounts for at least 10% of total sales in 2013.

 

The Company is not dependent on any of its major customers or any one particular customer as there is a liquid market for crude oil and petroleum products. As of December 31, 2013, the amount of current receivable from the Company's major customer totaled RUB 59 billion, or around 16% of the Company's trade receivables.

 

9. Taxes other than income tax

 

Taxes other than income tax for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2013

2012 (restated)

2011

Mineral extraction tax

829

553

414

Excise tax

136

79

55

Property tax

22

12

11

Other

37

28

18

Total taxes

1,024

672

498

 

10. Export customs duty

 

Export customs duty for the years ended December 31 comprises the following:

 

2013

2012

2011

Export customs duty on oil sales

1,025

689

612

Export customs duty on gas sales

1

-

-

Export customs duty on petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

356

212

178

Total export customs duty

1,382

901

790

 

11. Finance income

 

Finance income for the years ended December 31 comprises the following:

 

2013

2012

2011

Interest income on:

Deposits and deposit certificates

5

5

11

Loans issued

6

6

5

Notes receivable

2

3

2

Bonds

3

3

2

Current/settlement accounts

1

1

-

Other interest income

1

-

-

Total interest income

18

18

20

Gain from changes in fair value of financial assets at fair value recognized in profit or loss

3

-

-

Net gain from operations with derivative financial instruments

-

5

-

Gain from disposal of financial assets

-

1

-

Total finance income

21

24

20

 

Gain from changes in fair value of financial assets at fair value recognized in profit or loss in the amount of RUB 3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013, relates to non-derivative current financial assets.

 

12. Finance expenses

 

Finance expenses for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2013

2012

2011

Interest expense on:

Loans and borrowings

(38)

(8)

(7)

For the use of funds

(5)

-

-

Other interest expenses

(1)

(2)

(1)

Total interest expenses

(44)

(10)

(8)

Restructured tax liabilities

-

-

(3)

Net loss from operations with derivative financial instruments

(4)

-

(3)

Loss from disposal of financial assets

-

(1)

-

Increase in provision due to the unwinding of discount

(8)

(4)

(5)

Total finance expenses

(56)

(15)

(19)

 

The weighted average rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalization is 3.97%, 4.05% and 3.70% p.a. in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

13. Other income and expenses

 

Other income for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2013

2012 (restated)

2011

Non-cash income from acquisition of subsidiaries, net (Note 7)

205

82

-

Compensation payment for licenses from joint venture parties

2

-

-

Other

35

5

25

Total other income

242

87

25

 

Other expenses for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2013

2012

2011

Sale and disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

13

9

19

Disposal of companies and non-production assets

5

11

10

Impairment of assets

9

10

4

Social payments, charity, sponsorship, financial aid

12

9

12

Fines and penalties

3

-

-

Other

17

11

3

Total other expenses

59

50

48

 

In 2013, a number of market quoted financial assets and certain other assets were impaired due to constant decreases in market prices. In 2012, Impairment of assets comprises impairment of rights for exploration and production in a number of license areas in Eastern Siberia due to the lack of positive results of exploration.

 

14. Personnel expenses

 

Personnel expenses for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2013

2012 (restated)

2011

Salary

144

101

75

Statutory insurance contributions

31

21

16

Expenses for non-statutory defined contribution plan

4

3

3

Other employee benefits

6

6

3

Total personnel expenses

185

131

97

 

Personnel expenses are included in Production and operating expenses, General and administrative expenses and Other expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

15. Operating leases

 

Operating lease agreements have various terms and conditions and primarily consist of indefinite tenancy agreements for the lease of land plots under oilfield pipelines and petrol stations, agreements for the lease of rail cars and rail tank cars for periods over 12 months, and agreements for the lease of land plots for industrial sites of the Company's oil refining plants. The agreements provide for an annual revision of the rental rates and contractual terms and conditions.

 

Total operating lease expenses for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 amounted to RUB 16 billion, RUB 8 billion and RUB 10 billion, respectively. The expenses were recognized within production and operating expenses, general and administrative expenses and other expenses in the statement of comprehensive income.

 

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases as of December 31 are as follows:

 

2013

2012

2011

Less than 1 year

16

8

9

From 1 to 5 years

50

18

18

Over 5 years

163

41

14

Total future minimum lease payments

229

67

41

 

16. Income tax

 

Income tax expenses for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2013

2012 (restated)

2011 (restated)

Current income tax

98

86

99

Prior period adjustments

(16)

(5)

(3)

Current income tax expense

82

81

96

Deferred tax relating to origination and reversal of temporary differences

(1)

23

(6)

Total deferred income tax (benefit)/expense

(1)

23

(6)

Total income tax expense

81

104

90

 

Except for applicable regional tax reliefs, the Russian income tax rate of 20% applied for companies domiciled in Russian Federation in 2013, 2012 and 2011. Income tax rate may vary from 20% for subsidiaries incorporated in other jurisdictions. It is calculated according to local fiscal regulations.

 

Temporary differences between these consolidated financial statements and tax records gave rise to the following deferred income tax assets and liabilities:

 

Consolidated balance sheet

as of December 31

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the years, ended December 31

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

(restated)

2013

2012

(restated)

Short-term financial assets

4

3

1

1

2

Short-term accounts receivable, net of allowance

2

3

3

(1)

Inventories

2

1

1

Prepayments and other current assets

1

1

Long-term financial assets

2

1

1

Long-term accounts receivable, net of allowance

1

1

Property, plant and equipment

5

1

2

(1)

Other non-current assets

2

(2)

Short-term accounts payable and accrued liabilities

7

3

4

1

(1)

Current financial liabilities

1

1

Other current liabilities

5

1

3

(1)

Long-term accounts payable and accrued liabilities

3

2

1

1

Long- term accrued provisions

12

2

1

2

1

Tax loss carry forward

8

3

1

2

Valuation allowance for deferred income tax asset

(7)

(2)

(2)

(5)

Less: deferred tax liabilities offset

(32)

(13)

(11)

Deferred tax assets

14

4

4

4

2

Property, plant and equipment

(437)

(215)

(189)

(4)

(26)

Mineral rights

(255)

(62)

(63)

1

1

Less: deferred tax assets offset

32

13

11

Deferred tax liabilities

(660)

(264)

(241)

(3)

(25)

Deferred income tax benefit/(expense)

1

(23)

Net deferred tax liabilities

(646)

(260)

(237)

Recognised in the Consolidated balance sheet as following:

Deferred tax assets

14

4

4

Deferred tax liabilities

(660)

(264)

(241)

Net deferred tax liabilities

(646)

(260)

(237)

 

Net deferred tax liabilities reconciliation is as follows:

 

2013

2012

(restated)

As of January 1

(260)

(237)

Deferred income tax benefit /(expense), recognized in the statement of comprehensive income

1

(23)

Acquisition of subsidiaries (Note 7)

(409)

Reclassification to assets held for sale

22

As of December 31

(646)

(260)

 

A reconciliation between tax expense and the product of accounting profit multiplied by 20% tax rate for the years ended 31 December 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

 

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

(restated)

Income before income tax

632

469

425

Income tax at statutory rate of 20%

126

94

85

Increase/(decrease) resulting from:

Effect of income tax rates in other jurisdictions

3

2

3

Effect of income tax reliefs

(13)

(12)

(6)

Effect of non-taxable income from acquisition of subsidiaries (Note 7)

(41)

Effect of non-taxable income and non-deductible expenses

6

20

8

Income tax

81

104

90

 

Unrecognized deferred tax assets in the consolidation balance sheet for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 amounted to RUB 5 billion, RUB 7 billion and RUB 5 billion, respectively, related to unused tax losses. Tax loss carry forwards available for utilization to the Company expire in 2014-2023.

 

17. Non-controlling interests

 

Non-controlling interests include:

 

As of December 31, 2013

2013

As of December 31, 2012 (restated)

2012 (restated)

As of December 31, 2011 (restated)

2011 (restated)

Non-control-ling interest (%)

Non-control-ling interest in net assets

Non-control-ling interest in net income

Non-control-ling interest (%)

Non-control-ling interest in net assets

Non-control-ling interest in net income

Non-control-ling interest (%)

Non-control-ling interest in net assets

Non-control-ling interest in net income

CJSC Vankorneft

6.04

29

3

6.04

26

2

6.04

24

7

OJSC Grozneftegaz

49.00

3

(3)

49.00

6

-

49.00

6

-

OJSC Rosneft Sakhalin

45.00

2

-

45.00

2

-

45.00

2

-

OJSC Russian Regional Development Bank (VBRR)

15.33

1

-

15.33

1

-

15.33

1

-

CJSC TZK Sheremetyevo (Note 7)

25.10

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

SIA ITERA Latvija (Note 7)

34.00

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

OJSC RN Holding(Notes 7, 37)

-

-

2

-

-

-

-

-

-

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz (Notes 7, 37)

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

OJSC Samotlorneftegaz (Notes 7, 37)

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

LLC RN-Uvatneftegaz (Notes 7, 37)

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

OJSC Orenburgneft(Notes 7, 37)

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-controlling interests in other entities

various

2

-

various

4

-

various

3

(3)

Non-controlling interests as of the end of the reporting period

39

6

39

2

36

4

 

18. Earnings per share

 

For the years ended December 31, basic earnings per share comprise the following:

 

2013

2012 (restated)

2011 (restated)

Continued operations

Net income attributable to shareholders of Rosneft

545

363

331

Weighted average number of issued common shares outstanding (millions)

10,304

9,416

9,591

Total basic earnings per share (RUB)

52.89

38.55

34.51

 

19. Cash and cash equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following:

 

As of December 31,

2013

2012

(restated)

Cash on hand and in bank accounts in RUB

58

19

Cash on hand and in bank accounts in foreign currencies

172

206

Deposits

43

72

Other

2

2

Total cash and cash equivalents

275

299

 

Cash accounts denominated in foreign currencies represent primarily cash in US$.

 

Deposits are interest bearing and denominated primarily in RUB.

 

Restricted cash comprises the following:

 

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Obligatory reserve of subsidiary banks with the CBR

1

1

Offsetting account under joint venture agreement with BP group in Euro

-

3

Total restricted cash

1

4

 

20. Other short-term financial assets

 

Other short-term financialassets comprise the following:

 

As of December 31,

2013

2012 (restated)

Financial assets available-for-sale:

Bonds

21

14

Stocks and shares

22

6

Loans and accounts receivable:

Loans granted

17

18

Loans issued to associates

4

1

Notes receivable, net of allowance

21

27

Loans granted under reverse repurchase agreements

1

-

Deposits and deposit certificates

131

-

Held-for-trading financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

Corporate bonds

11

10

State bonds

4

5

Stocks and shares

-

6

Derivative financial instruments

-

3

Total other short-term financial assets

232

90

 

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 available-for-sale bonds comprise the following:

 

Type of security

2013

2012

Balance

Interest rate p.a.

Date of maturity

Balance

Interest rate p.a.

Date of maturity

State bonds(federal loan bonds issued by the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation)

6

7.0-8.1%

March 2014 - June 2015

3

6.9-8.1%

November 2014 - July 2015

Municipal bonds

2

8.35-9.0%

December 2014 - November 2018

1

8.75-9.25%

June 2013 - November 2018

Corporate bonds

13

3.72-10.0%

February 2014 - November 2024

10

4.25-10.0%

February 2013 - November 2023

Total

21

14

 

Bank deposits amount to RUB 131 billion and RUB 0 billion as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, bank deposits denominated in US$ amount to RUB 85 billion and bear interest rates ranging from 1.8% to 3.0% p.a. Bank deposits denominated in RUB amount to RUB 46 billion and bear interest rates ranging from 7.0% to 9.0% p.a.

 

As of December 31, 2013, notes receivable include corporate notes receivable that are primarily denominated in RUB with nominal interest rates ranging from 4.25% to 10.7% p.a. with maturities to December 2014 and nominally interest-free corporate notes receivable with weighted average effective interest rate of 4.8% p.a. with maturities to December 2014.

 

As of December 31, 2012, notes receivable include corporate notes receivable that are primarily denominated in RUB with nominal interest rates ranging from 4.25% to 8.50% p.a. with maturities to November 2014 and nominally interest-free corporate notes receivable with weighted average effective interest rate of 5.94% p.a. with maturities to June 2013.

 

Reverse repurchase agreements are collateralized by trading securities with a fair value of RUB 1 billion and RUB 0 billion as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 trading securities comprise the following:

 

Type of security

2013

2012

Balance

Interest rate p.a.

Date of maturity

Balance

Interest rate

p.a.

Date ofmaturity

Corporate bonds

11

1.99 - 13.5%

February 2014 - October 2026

10

2.85 - 13.5%

March 2013 - October 2023

State and municipal bonds

4

5.5 - 12.0%

April 2014 - February 2036

5

6.7 - 12.0%

January 2013 - February 2036

Trading stocks with state participation

-

6

Total

15

21

 

Derivative financial instruments

 

In 2012 the Company entered into a series of deliverable conversion transactions with options (collar) for the sale of US$ for a term until December 2013. The RUB/US$ exchange spot rate was fixed at predetermined dates monthly. In the event that the RUB/US$ exchange spot rate broke out of the upper or lower bands of the collar, the parties of the contract executed currency purchase-sale transaction for nominal amount of US$ 20.5 million (RUB 1 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) at the conversion rates, stipulated in the contract. Fair value is calculated based on market data using SuperDerivatives valuation service. Fair value of the series of deliverable conversion transactions with options (collar) was presented in Other short-term financial assets - Derivative financial instruments in the amount of RUB 1 billion in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012.

 

Fair value of cross-currency rate swap contracts is presented in Other short-term financial assets - Derivative financial instruments in the amount of RUB 2 billion in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 (Note 31).

 

21. Accounts receivable

 

Accounts receivable include the following:

As of December 31,

2013

2012 (restated)

Trade receivables

378

204

Banking loans to customers

16

19

Other accounts receivable

30

22

Total

424

245

Allowance for doubtful accounts

(9)

(8)

Total accounts receivable, net of allowance

415

237

 

The allowance for doubtful accounts is recognized at each balance sheet date based on estimates of the Company's management regarding the expected cash inflows to repay accounts receivable.

 

The Company recognized allowance for doubtful accounts for all significant past due accounts receivable as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 accounts receivable were not pledged as collateral for loans and borrowings provided to the Company.

 

22. Inventories

 

Inventories comprise the following:

As of December 31,

2013

2012 (restated)

Crude oil and associated gas

69

46

Petroleum products and petrochemicals

96

66

Materials and supplies

37

22

Total

202

134

 

Materials and supplies mostly include spare parts. Petroleum products and petrochemicals include those designated both for sale and for own use.

 

The Company retrospectively changed the classification of inventories in order to conform to industry practices. Petroleum products held for further processing were reclassified from Work in progress to Petroleum products and petrochemicals. The carrying amounts reclassified were RUB 13 billion and RUB 10 billion as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Other inventories included in Work in progress were reclassified to Materials and supplies. The carrying amounts reclassified were RUB 1 billion and RUB 1 billion as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

For the years ended December 31:

 

2013

2012 (restated)

2011

The cost of inventories recognized as an expense during the period

581

346

297

 

Cost of inventories recognized as an expense during the period is included in Production and operating expenses, Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs and General and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

23. Prepayments and other current assets

 

Prepayments comprise the following:

 

As of December 31,

2013

2012

(restated)

Value added tax and excise receivable

183

90

Prepayments to suppliers

36

24

Prepaid customs duties

80

54

Other taxes

25

11

Other

6

6

Total prepayments and other current assets

330

185

 

Prepaid customs duties primarily represent export duties related to the export of crude oil and petroleum products (Note 10). 

 

24. Property, plant and equipment and construction in progress

 

Explorationand production

Refining and distribution

Corporate and other unallocated activities

Total

Cost

As of January 1, 2012 (restated)

2,266

561

98

2,925

Additions

311

151

24

486

Disposals

(15)

(7)

(10)

(32)

Exchange differences

(6)

(6)

Cost of asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations

5

5

As of December 31, 2012 (restated)

2,561

705

112

3,378

Depreciation, depletion and impairment losses

As of January 1, 2012 (restated)

(452)

(113)

(32)

(597)

Depreciation and depletion charge (restated)

(164)

(33)

(11)

(208)

Disposals and other movements

1

1

1

3

Impairment of assets

(10)

(10)

Exchange differences

4

4

As of December 31, 2012 (restated)

(621)

(145)

(42)

(808)

Net book value as of January 1, 2012 (restated)

1,814

448

66

2,328

Net book value as of December 31, 2012 (restated)

1,940

560

70

2,570

Prepayments for property, plant and equipment as of January 1, 2012 (restated)

11

28

4

43

Prepayments for property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2012 (restated)

4

46

9

59

Total as of January 1, 2012 (restated)

1,825

476

70

2,371

Total as of December 31, 2012 (restated)

1,944

606

79

2,629

Cost

Acquisition of subsidiaries (Note 7)

2,371

277

1

2,649

Additions

352

220

23

595

Disposals

(36)

(6)

(4)

(46)

Reclassification to assets held for sale (Note 7)

(144)

(144)

Exchange differences

11

4

15

Cost of asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations

7

7

As of December 31, 2013

5,122

1,200

132

6,454

Depreciation, depletion and impairment losses

Depreciation and depletion charge

(329)

(53)

(10)

(392)

Disposals and other movements

16

4

3

23

Impairment of assets

(1)

(1)

Exchange differences

(7)

(1)

(8)

As of December 31, 2013

(941)

(196)

(49)

(1,186)

Net book value as of December 31, 2013

4,181

1,004

83

5,268

Prepayments for property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2013

4

49

9

62

Total as of December 31, 2013

4,185

1,053

92

5,330

 

The cost of construction in progress included in property, plant and equipment was RUB 928 billion, RUB 654 billion and RUB 441 billion as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively.

 

In 2012, the Company identified an impairment indicator (exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area have not led to the discovery of commercially viable quantities of mineral resources and the entity has decided to discontinue such activities in the specific area) with respect to the three exploration licenses, included in Exploration and production segment of Property, plant and equipment. As a result the Company recognized an impairment loss of RUB 10 billion in Other expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income in 2012.

 

Depreciation charge for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 includes depreciation which was capitalized as part of the construction cost of property, plant and equipment and cost of inventory in the amount of RUB 4 billion and RUB 4 billion, respectively .

 

The Company capitalized RUB 33 billion, RUB 24 billion and RUB 14 billion of interest expenses on loans and borrowings in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

During 2013 the Company received government grants for capital expenditures in the amount of RUB 7 billion. Grants are accounted for as a reduction of additions in Exploration and production segment.

 

Exploration and evaluation assets

 

Exploration and evaluation assets included in segment "Exploration and production" comprise the following:

 

2013

2012

As of January 1

11

11

Capitalized expenditures

7

4

Acquisition of subsidiaries

3

-

Reclassified to development assets

(6)

(4)

Expensed

(2)

-

As of December 31

13

11

 

Mineral rights

 

Mineral rights included in exploration and production assets comprise the following:

 

Mineral rights to proved properties

Mineral rights to unproved properties

Total

As of January 1, 2012 (restated)

Cost

269

104

373

Accumulated depletion and impairment losses

(45)

(45)

Net book value as of January 1, 2012 (restated)

224

104

328

Depletion charge

(15)

(15)

Additions

6

6

Impairment of properties

(10)

(10)

Reclassification from unproved properties to proved properties

2

(2)

As of December 31, 2012 (restated)

Cost

271

108

379

Accumulated depletion and impairment losses

(60)

(10)

(70)

Net book value as of December 31, 2012 (restated)

211

98

309

Depletion charge

(44)

(44)

Additions

9

9

Acquisition of subsidiaries

975

126

1,101

Reclassification to assets held for sale (Note 7)

(55)

(50)

(105)

Reclassification from unproved properties to proved properties

10

(10)

As of December 31, 2013

Cost

1,201

183

1,384

Accumulated depletion and impairment losses

(104)

(10)

(114)

Net book value as of December 31, 2013

1,097

173

1,270

 

Provision for asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations

 

The provision for asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations was RUB 64 billion, RUB 38 billion and RUB 36 billion as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively, and included in Property, plant and equipment.

 

25. Intangible assets and goodwill

 

Intangible assets and goodwill comprise the following:

 

Rights for land lease

Other intangible assets

Total intangible assets

Goodwill

Cost

As of January 1, 2012 (restated)

19

9

28

142

Additions

2

2

2

Disposals

(1)

(2)

(3)

As of December 31, 2012 (restated)

18

9

27

144

Amortization

As of January 1, 2012 (restated)

(4)

(2)

(6)

Amortization charge

(1)

(1)

(2)

As of December 31, 2012 (restated)

(5)

(3)

(8)

Net book value as of January 1, 2012 (restated)

15

7

22

142

Net book value as of December 31, 2012 (restated)

13

6

19

144

Cost

Additions

1

3

4

Disposals

(6)

(4)

(10)

Acquisition of subsidiaries (Note 7)

10

16

26

20

As of December 31, 2013

23

24

47

164

Amortization

Amortization charge

(2)

(2)

(4)

Disposal of amortization

2

2

As of December 31, 2013

(5)

(5)

(10)

Net book value as of December 31, 2013

18

19

37

164

 

The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test as of October 1 of each year. The impairment test was carried out at the beginning of the fourth quarter of each year using data that was appropriate at that time. As a result of the annual test, no impairment of goodwill was identified in 2013 or 2012.

 

Goodwill acquired through business combinations has been allocated to related groups of cash generating units being its operating segments - Exploration and production segment and Refining and distribution segment. In assessing whether goodwill has been impaired, the current values of the operating segments (including goodwill) were compared with their estimated value in use.

As of December 31,

2013

2012(restated)

Goodwill

Exploration and production

31

31

Refining and distribution

133

113

Total

164

144

 

The Company has estimated value in use of the operating segments using a discounted cash flow model. Future cash flows have been adjusted for risks specific to the segment and discounted using a rate, which reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the segment for which the future cash flow estimates have not been adjusted.

 

The Company's business plan, approved by the Company's Board of Directors, is the primary source of information for the determination of the operating segments' value in use. The business plan contains internal forecasts of oil and gas production, refinery throughputs, sales volumes of various types of refined products, revenues, operating and capital expenditures. As an initial step in the preparation of these plans, various assumptions, such as oil prices, natural gas prices, refining margins, petroleum product margins and cost inflation rates, are set. These assumptions take into account existing prices, US$ and RUB inflation rates, other macroeconomic factors and historical trends, as well as markets volatility.

 

In determining the value in use for each of the operating segments, cash flows have been discounted and aggregated with the segments' terminal value. In determining the terminal value of the Company's segments in the post-forecast period the Gordon model has been used. The model has used average rates of operation decline equal to natural rates of production decline for the existing assets provided that there is no production drilling. These rates were 8.0% of annual decline for Exploration and production segment and 0.0% for Refining and distribution segment.

 

The most important assumptions among the factors listed above are the following:

discount rate;

oil price;

production volumes.

 

The sensitivity of the discounted cash flows to the changes in these factors is the most significant.

 

The discount rate calculation is based on the Company's weighted average cost of capital adjusted to reflect pre-tax discount rate and amounts to 6.9% p.a. in 2013 (6.9% p.a. in 2012). Estimated production volumes are based on detailed data for the fields and takes into account fields' development plan approved by management through the long-term planning process. For the purposes of impairment testing, the Company's Urals oil price assumptions were based on the forecasted market prices. Management believes that no reasonably possible changes in the assumptions may lead to the goodwill impairment.

 

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company did not have any intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 no intangible assets have been pledged as collateral.

 

26. Other long-term financial assets

 

Other long-term financial assets comprise the following:

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Bonds

1

1

Bank deposits

6

-

Financial assets available for sale

Shares of OJSC INTER RAO UES

1

3

Shares of OJSC Russian Grids

1

3

Shares of AS Latvijas Gaze, ASE esti GAAS

2

-

Long-term loans issued to associates

20

11

Long-term borrowings

3

-

Loans to employees

1

1

Derivative financial instruments

1

2

Other

4

3

Total other long-term financial assets

40

24

 

Pursuant to contracts, long-term loans issued to associates have a maturity period from 3 through 9 years and bear interest rate ranging from 8.2% to 14.5% p.a.

 

Pursuant to contracts, long-term RUB denominated deposits have a maturity period 5 years and bear interest rate of 8% p.a.

 

As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no overdue long-term financial assets for which no impairment provision was created.

 

As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, shares of OJSC INTER RAO UES were impaired in the amount of RUB 2 billion and RUB 2 billion, respectively, loans issued to associates were impaired in the amount of RUB 0 billion and RUB 0 billion, respectively.

 

No long-term financial assets were pledged as collateral as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, no long-term financial assets were received by the Company as collateral.

 

Derivative financial instruments

 

In 2012 the Company entered into a series of deliverable forward transactions for the sale of US$ for a term until 2015 for the nominal amount of US$ 1,259 million (RUB 41 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013). The Company sells US$ in accordance with the schedule at the conversion rates, stipulated in the contract. Fair value is calculated based on market data using Bloomberg valuation services. Fair value of the series of deliverable forward transactions is presented in Other long-term financial assets - Derivative financial instruments in the amount of RUB 1 billion and RUB 2 billion in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The change in fair value measurements resulted in unrealized loss in the amount of RUB 1 billion. Realized gain in the form of net payments, recalculated in RUB at the CBR official exchange rate as of the date of payments, between the contract participants was RUB 0 billion in 2013. The net effect of a series of deliverable forward transactions is presented in Finance expenses - Net loss from operations with derivative financial instruments in the amount of RUB 1 billion in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for 2013 (Note 12).

 

27. Investments in joint ventures and associates

 

Investments in joint ventures and associates comprise the following:

 

Name of an investee

Country

The Company's share

as of December 31,

2013, %

As of December31,

2013

2012 (restated)

Joint ventures

Polar Lights Company LLC

Russia

50.00

1

1

Rosneft Shell Caspian Vent.

Russia

51.00

1

1

Taihu Ltd (OJSC Udmurtneft)

Cyprus

51.00

20

13

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz

Russia

Note 7

-

30

Lanard Holdings Ltd

Cyprus

50.00

18

17

NGK ITERA LLC

Russia

Note 7

-

95

CJSC Arktikshelfneftegaz

Russia

50.00

3

3

National Oil Consortium LLC

Russia

60.00

12

3

Saras S.p.A.

Italy

20.99

13

-

OJSC NGK Slavneft

Russia

49.94

166

-

Boqueron, Petroperija, PetroMonagas S.A.

Venezuela

various

17

-

NVGRES Holdings Limited (NVGRES LLC)

Cyprus

25.00

5

-

CJSC Messoyakhaneftegaz

Russia

50.00

2

-

CJSC STS

Russia

50.00

4

-

Associates

CJSC Purgaz

Russia

49.00

57

-

Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha LLC

Russia

Note 7

-

13

Other associates

various

8

10

Total joint ventures and associates

327

186

 

Financial information on significant joint ventures and associates as of December 31, 2013 is presented below:

 

The Company's share in net assets

Taihu Ltd

OJSC NGK Slavneft

Lanard Holdings

Ltd

CJSC Purgaz

Current assets

10

23

1

1

Non-current assets

41

117

1

5

Total assets

51

140

2

6

Current liabilities

(9)

(32)

(1)

(1)

Non-current liabilities

(22)

(28)

-

-

Total liabilities

(31)

(60)

(1)

(1)

Total Company's share in net assets

20

80

1

5

 

The Company's share in net profit

Taihu Ltd

OJSC NGK Slavneft

Lanard Holdings Ltd

CJSC Purgaz

Sales revenue

56

97

2

3

Cost of sales

(42)

(39)

(2)

(3)

Gross profit

14

58

-

-

Other expenses

(2)

(48)

-

-

Profit before tax

12

10

-

-

Income tax

(3)

(2)

-

-

Total Company's share in net profit

9

8

-

-

 

Financial information on significant joint ventures and associates as of December 31, 2012 is presented below:

 

The Company's share in net assets

Taihu Ltd

Lanard Holdings Ltd

Current assets

10

-

Non-current assets

46

1

Total assets

56

1

Current liabilities

(6)

-

Non-current liabilities

(37)

-

Total liabilities

(43)

-

Total Company's share in net assets

13

1

 

The Company's share in net profit

Taihu Ltd

Lanard Holdings Ltd

Sales revenue

55

2

Cost of sales

(41)

(2)

Gross profit

14

-

Other expenses

(3)

-

Profit before tax

11

-

Income tax

(3)

-

Total Company's share in net profit

8

-

 

The difference of RUB 52 billion between the cost of investments and the Сompany's share in the net assets of CJSC Purgaz is an adjustment to the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities at the date of the associate acquisition. This difference is included in the carrying amount of investments in CJSC Purgaz.

 

Investments in Lanard Holdings LTD include adjustments to the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities at the date of the associate acquisition, and goodwill. The difference amounting to RUB 17 billion is included in the carrying amount of investments in Lanard Holdings Ltd.

 

The difference of RUB 86 billion between the cost of investments and the Сompany's share in the net assets of OJSC NGK Slavneft is an adjustmentto the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities at the date of the associate acquisition. This difference is included in the carrying amount of investments in OJSC NGK Slavneft.

 

Equity share in profits/(losses) of joint ventures and associates:

 

The Company's share

as of December 31,

2013, %

Share in income/(loss)of equity investees

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

Polar Lights Company LLC

50.00

-

1

1

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz

Note 7

3

14

8

Taihu Ltd

51.00

9

8

7

NGK ITERA LLC

Note 7

2

2

-

OJSC NGK Slavneft

49.94

(4)

-

-

Other

various

2

(2)

-

Total equity share in profits

12

23

16

 

The difference of RUB 12 billion between the share in loss of the equity investee and the Company's share in net income of OJSC NGK Slavneft is an adjustment to the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities after the date of the acquisition.

 

OJSC NGK Slavneft

 

As a result of TNK-BP acquisition (Note 7) the Company obtained 49.9% interest in OJSC NGK Slavneft. The investment in OJSC NGK Slavneftof RUB 173 billion is accounted for as an investment in a joint venture using the equity method.

 

OJSC NGK Slavneft holds licenses for the exploration and production of oil and gas at 31 license areas located in West Siberia and the Krasnoyarsk region. The annual production of OJSC NGK Slavneft is 17 million tons of crude oil. The crude oil produced (excluding export) is processed at OJSC NGK Slavneft's refineries. The OJSC NGK Slavneft's refineries process over 26 million tons of hydrocarbons and produce over 5 million tons of gasoline annually.

 

Investments in Venezuela

 

As a result of TNK-BP acquisition (Note 7) the Company obtained equity interests in certain assets in Venezuela. The most significant of these investments is in PetroMonagas S.A. in which the Company holds a 16.7% share. The investment in Venezuela of RUB 17 billion is accounted for as an investment in joint venture using the equity method.

 

PetroMonagas S.A. is engaged in exploration and development of oil fields in the eastern part of Orinoko Basin. In 2013 PetroMonagas S.A. produced 8.3 million tons of oil equivalent. PetroMonagas S.A. is an integrated project involving the extra-heavy crude oil extraction and upgrading, production and export of synthetic crude oil.

 

Acquisition of interest in exploratory assets in Brazil

 

As a result of TNK-BP acquisition (Note 7) the Company obtained 45% interest in certain concession agreements for 21 exploratory blocks in the Brazilian Solimoes Basin. The fair value of Brazilian assets is RUB 10 billion (US$ 317 million at the CBR official exchange rate at the acquisition date). The investment is accounted for as joint operation as the Company has acquired undivided interests in the respective assets and liabilities. In 2013 the Company recognized a share of loss from its investments in Brazil in the amount of RUB 2 billion.

 

National Oil Consortium LLC

 

In January 2013, Company acquired additional 20% ownership share in LLC National Oil Consortium ("NOC") for RUB 6 billion. As a result of this acquisition and TNK-BP acquisition (Note 7), the Company's interest in NOC increased to 60%. NOC provides financing of exploration project at Junin-6 block in Venezuela jointly with a subsidiary of Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. ("PDVSA"), Venezuelan state oil company. The interest in NOC is continued to be accounted for as an equity investment due to joint control under the shareholder's agreement.

 

Acquisition of interest in refining assets

 

On April 23, 2013 the Company acquired 13.70% share in Saras S.p.A. ("Saras") for the total consideration of EURO 178.5 million (RUB 7 billion at the CBR official exchange rate at the acquisition date) from Angelo Moratti S.a.p.a., Gian Marco Moratti and Massimo Moratti.

 

On June 14, 2013 as a result of a voluntary public offer in respect of 69,310,933 ordinary shares the Company acquired an additional 7.29% interest in Saras for the total consideration of EURO 95 million (RUB 4 billion at the CBR official exchange rate at the acquisition date).

 

As a result of this acquisition, the Company's share in equity of Saras increased to 20.99% and is accounted for as an equity investment.

 

Saras is a leading Italian and European crude oil refiner which sells and distributes petroleum products in Italy and international markets. Saras is also engaged in electric power production and sale, industrial engineering and scientific research services to the oil, electric power and environment sectors, and hydrocarbons exploration.

 

28. Other non-current non-financial assets

 

Other non-current non-financial assets comprise the following:

 

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Long-term advances issued

6

-

Prepaid insurance

1

1

Other

5

2

Total other non-current non-financial assets

12

3

 

29. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities comprise the following:

 

As of December 31,

2013

2012 (restated)

Financial liabilities

Accounts payable to suppliers and contractors

187

117

Voluntary offer to acquire OJSC RN Holding securities (Note 37)

153

-

Salary and other benefits payable

45

22

Banking customer accounts

36

41

Other accounts payable

22

13

Total financial liabilities

443

193

Non-financial liabilities

Short-term advances received

45

18

Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities

488

211

 

In 2013 current accounts payable were settled within 47 days (2012: 31 days) on average. Interest rates on banking customer accounts amount to 0.1-3.0% p.a. Trade and other payables are non-interest bearing.

 

30. Loans, borrowings and finance lease liabilities

 

Loans and borrowings comprise the following:

As of December 31,

Currency

2013

2012 (restated)

Long-term

Bank loans

RUB

115

101

Bank loans

US$, Euro

1,711

648

Bonds

RUB

131

20

Eurobonds

US$

247

91

Customer deposits

RUB

12

8

Customer deposits

US$, Euro

5

3

Other debt

RUB

-

1

Less: Current portion of long-term loans and borrowings

(545)

(35)

Long-term loans and borrowings

1,676

837

Short-term

Bank loans

RUB

2

8

Bank loans

US$

88

12

Customer deposits

RUB

11

12

Customer deposits

US$, Euro

2

3

Borrowings

RUB

-

2

Borrowings

Euro

3

5

Borrowings - Yukos related

RUB

11

11

Promissory notes payable - Yukos related

RUB

20

52

Promissory notes payable

RUB

1

1

Obligations under a repurchase agreement

RUB

1

2

Current portion of long-term loans and borrowings

545

35

Short-term loans and borrowings and current portion of long-term loans and borrowings

684

143

Total loans and borrowings

2,360

980

 

Long-term loans and borrowings

 

Long-term bank loans comprise the following:

Purpose of the loan

Currency

Interest rate p.a.

Maturity date

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Loans raised for replenishment of working capital

US$/Euro

LIBOR+1.3% - LIBOR+2.70%;/EURIBOR+2.40%

2014-2018

1,135

167

Loans raised to finance special-purpose business activities

US$

LIBOR+0.60% -LIBOR+3.25%

2029

557

456

Loans raised to finance special-purpose business activities

RUB

7.20% -9.50%

2015-2017

115

101

Loans raised for property, plant and equipment construction/purchase

US$/Euro

LIBOR+1.00% - LIBOR+1.35%; 3.23%;/EURIBOR+0.35%

2014-2021

28

27

Total

1,835

751

Debt issue costs

(9)

(2)

Total long-term bank loans

1,826

749

 

Generally, long-term bank loans from foreign banks are denominated in US$ and partially secured by oil export contracts. If the Company fails to make timely debt repayments, the terms of such contracts are normally provided the lender with an express right of claim for contractual revenue in the amount of failing loan repayments which must be remitted directly through transit currency accounts in lender banks. Accounts receivable outstanding balance arising out of such contracts amounts to RUB 24 billion and RUB 32 billion as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and is included in Trade receivables.

 

Certain US$ denominated loans raised for replenishment of working capital were acquired through TNK-BP acquisition (Note 7).

 

In March 2013, the Company drew down four long-term unsecured loans from a group of international banks for a total of US$ 31.04 billion (RUB 1,016 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013) to finance the acquision of TNK-BP (Note 7). The first debt agreement of US$ 4.09 billion (RUB 134 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013) was entered into with the syndicate of foreign banks for 5 years at floating rates. The second debt agreement was entered into with the syndicate of foreign banks at floating rates in the amount of US$ 12.74 billion (RUB 417 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013) for 2 years. The third debt agreement was entered into with the syndicate of foreign banks at floating rates for 2 years in the amount of US$ 11.88 billion (RUB 389 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013). The fourth debt agreement in the amount of US$ 2.33 billion (RUB 76 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013) was entered into with the syndicate of foreign banks for 5 years at floating rates. As of December 31, 2013 loans are drawn down in full. In December 2013 the Company repaid US$ 5.1 billion (RUB 167 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013) of the long-term loan from international banks.

 

In June 2013, the Company drew down funds under long-term floating rate collateralized loan agreement with a foreign bank in the amount of US$ 2 billion (RUB 66 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013). The loan is repayable within 16 years and secured by oil export contracts.

 

In November 2013, the Company drew down funds under floating rate unsecured long-term loan from an international bank in amount of US$ 0.75 billion (RUB 25 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013) for 5 years.

 

In December 2013, the Company drew down funds under long-term floating rate unsecured loan from the group of international banks for a total amount of US$ 0.5 billion (RUB 16 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013) for 5 years.

 

In October 2012, the Company placed two issues of documentary interest-bearing non-convertible bearer bonds with a total nominal value of RUB 20 billion and the term of 10 years. Coupon payments are made on semi-annual basis of fixed rate of 8.6% p.a. for the first ten coupon periods.

 

In March 2013, the Company placed two issues of documentary interest-bearing non-convertible bearer bonds with a total nominal value of RUB 30 billion and the term of 10 years. Coupon payments are made on semi-annual basis of fixed rate of 8.0% p.a. for the first ten coupon periods.

 

In June 2013, the Company placed three issues of documentary interest-bearing non-convertible bearer bonds with a total nominal value of RUB 40 billion and the term of 10 years. Coupon payments are made on semi-annual basis of fixed rate of 7.95% p.a. for the first ten coupon periods.

 

In December 2013, the Company placed two issues of documentary interest-bearing non-convertible bearer stock bonds with a total nominal value of RUB 40 billion and the term of 10 years. Coupon payments are made on semi-annual basis of fixed rate of 7.95% p.a. for the first ten coupon periods.

 

All the above mentioned bonds provide for early repurchase in five years at the request of a bond holder as set in the respective offering documents. In addition, the issuer, at any time and at its discretion, may early purchase/repay the bonds with a possibility of subsequent bonds circulation. Such purchase/repayment of the bonds does not constitute an early redemption.

 

Corporate bonds comprise the following:

 

As of December 31,

Currency

Maturity

2013

2012

Eurobonds - (coupon interest rate -3.149%)

US$

2017

33

30

Eurobonds - (coupon interest rate -4.199%)

US$

2022

66

61

Eurobonds (Series 7) - (coupon interest rate -6.25%)

US$

2015

17

-

Eurobonds (Series 2) - (coupon interest rate -7.50%)

US$

2016

38

-

Eurobonds (Series 4) - (coupon interest rate -6.625%)

US$

2017

30

-

Eurobonds (Series 6) - (coupon interest rate -7.875%)

US$

2018

43

-

Eurobonds (Series 8) - (coupon interest rate -7.25%)

US$

2020

20

-

Total long-term Eurobonds

247

91

 

In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company raised the funds through Eurobonds placement in amount of US$ 3.0 billion. Eurobonds were placed by two tranches at a nominal value: one in the amount of US$ 1.0 billion (RUB 30 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) with the coupon of 3.149% p.a. to be matured in March 2017, and the other one in the amount of US$ 2.0 billion (RUB 61 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) with the coupon of 4.199% p.a. to be matured in March 2022. The funds received will be used for general corporate purposes.

 

Eurobonds of the second, the forth, the sixth, the seventh and the eighth series were acquired through TNK-BP acquisition (Note 7).

 

Customer deposits represent fixed-term deposits placed by customers with the Company's subsidiary banks, denominated in RUB and foreign currencies. As of December 31, 2013, RUB denominated deposits bear interest rates ranging from 1.00% to 12.00% p.a. and deposits denominated in foreign currencies bear interest rates ranging from 1.00% to 7.40% p.a.

 

The Company is obliged to comply with a number of restrictive financial and other covenants contained in its loan agreements. Such covenants include maintaining certain financial ratios.

 

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company was in compliance with all restrictive financial and other covenants contained in its loan agreements.

 

Short-term loans and borrowings 

 

In November 2013, the Company drew down two floating rates tranches of unsecured loan from international bank for a total amount of US$ 1.5 billion (RUB 49 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013): the first in amount of US$ 0.5 billion (RUB 16 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013) for 1 year and with possibility of further extension of up to 12 months; the second in amount of US$ 1.0 billion (RUB 33 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013) maturing within 6 months.

 

In December 2013, the Company drew down funds under two fixed rate short-term loans from Russian banks for a total of US$ 0.74 billion (RUB 24 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2013) with maturity in the first quarter of 2014.

 

Customer deposits represent fixed-term deposits placed by customers with the Company's subsidiary banks, denominated in RUB and foreign currencies. As of December 31, 2013 the RUB denominated deposits bear interest rates ranging from 0.01% to 12.00% p.a. and deposits denominated in foreign currencies bear interest rates ranging from 0.01% to 7.20% p.a.

 

RUB denominated borrowings - Yukos related primarily include borrowings provided by Yukos Capital S.a.r.l., at 9% p.a. interest that matured in 2007. The borrowings were carried in the books of the former Yukos subsidiaries the Company acquired through the auctions for the sale of the assets of Yukos. The borrowings are being disputed by the Company. The Company partially settled the above mentioned liabilities in compliance with the court decision in 2010 (Note 41).

 

Promissory notes payable - Yukos related comprise amounts that were carried in the books of the former Yukos subsidiaries the Company acquired through the auctions for the sale of the assets of Yukos. The promissory notes are being disputed by the Company. The promissory notes are claimed to be primarily payable on demand and bear interest rates ranging from 0% to 18% p.a. (Note 41).

 

In 2012-2013 the Company received cash under repurchase agreements and recognized these transactions as a collateralized loan. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the liabilities of the Company under repurchase agreements amounted to RUB 1 billion and RUB 2 billion, respectively, with the fair value amounted to RUB 1 billion and RUB 3 billion, respectively.

 

In 2013 the Company had neither delays in payments under loan agreements nor overdue interest payments.

 

Finance lease

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Finance lease liabilities

12

11

Including short-term financial lease liabilities

4

3

 

Repayments of finance lease obligations comprise the following:

 

As of December 31, 2013

Minimum

lease payments

Finance expense

Present value of minimum lease payments

Less than 1 year

5

(1)

4

From 1 to 5 years

6

(1)

5

Over 5 years

3

3

Total

14

(2)

12

 

 

As of December 31, 2012

Minimum

lease payments

Finance expense

Present value of minimum lease payments

Less than 1 year

4

(1)

3

From 1 to 5 years

6

(1)

5

Over 5 years

4

(1)

3

Total

14

(3)

11

 

Finance leases entered into by the Company do not contain covenants and are entered into for a long-term, with certain leases having purchase options at the end of lease term. Finance leases are denominated in RUB and US$.

The following is the analysis of the property, plant and equipment under capital leases recognized in Property, plant and equipment (Note 24):

 

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Plant and machinery

12

8

Vehicles

6

6

Total cost

18

14

Less: accumulated depreciation

(9)

(3)

Total net book value of leased property

9

11

 

31. Current liabilities related to derivative instruments

 

Current liabilities related to derivative instruments comprise:

 

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Cross-currency rate swaps

6

Total current liabilities related to derivative financial instruments

6

 

In 2013 the Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swap with four banks for a term through 2018. Under the swap the Company paysUS$ 2,138 million (RUB 70 billion at the CBR official exchange rate at December 31, 2013) at the floating interest rate of US$ 3-month LIBOR plus bank margin and receives RUB 70 billion at the fixed interest rates ranging from 7.95% to 8.0% p.a.

 

In 2012 the Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swap with five banks for a term through 2015. Under the swap the Company pays US$ 1,982 million (RUB 65 billion at the CBR official exchange rateat December 31, 2013) at the fixed interest rates and receives RUB 62 billion at the fixed interest rate of 7.2% p.a.

 

In 2012 the Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swap with two banks for a term through 2017. Under the swap the Company pays US$ 641 million (RUB 21 billion at the CBR official exchange rate at December 31, 2013) at the floating interest rate of US$ 3-month LIBOR plus bank margin and receives RUB 20 billion at the fixed interest rate of 8.6% p.a.

 

Fair value of cross-currency interest rate swaps is calculated based on market data using SuperDerivatives valuation service. Fair value of the cross-currency rate swaps is included in Current liabilities related to derivative financial instruments in the amount of RUB 6 billion in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 and in Other short-term financial assets - Derivative financial instruments (Note 20) in the amount of RUB 2 billion in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012. The change in fair value measurements resulted in unrealized loss in the amount of RUB 8 billion in 2013. Realized gain in the form of net payments, recalculated in RUB at the CBR official exchange rate as of the date of payments was RUB 5 billion in 2013. The net effect of cross-currency interest rate swaps is presented in Finance expenses - Net loss from operations with derivative financial instruments in the amount of RUB 3 billion in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for 2013 (Note 12).

 

32. Other short-term tax liabilities

 

Other short-term tax liabilities comprise the following:

As of December 31,

2013

2012 (restated)

Mineral extraction tax

81

46

VAT

50

23

Excise duties

14

10

Personal income tax

1

1

Property tax

6

3

Other

9

Total other tax liabilities

161

83

 

33. Provisions

 

Asset retirement obligations

Environmental remediation provision

Legal, tax and other claims

Total

As of January 1, 2012 (restated), including

50

11

5

66

Non-current

50

10

-

60

Current

-

1

5

6

Provisions charged during the year

5

1

1

7

Increase/(decrease) in the liability resulting from

Changes in estimates

(6)

3

(1)

(4)

Change in the discount rate

7

-

-

7

Unwinding of discount

4

-

-

4

Utilised

(3)

-

(2)

(5)

Effect of changes in accounting policies (Note 3)

1

-

-

1

As of December 31, 2012 (restated), including

58

15

3

76

Non-current

58

13

-

71

Current

-

2

3

5

Provisions charged during the year

15

4

2

21

Increase/(decrease) in the liability resulting from

Changes in estimates

(5)

-

3

(2)

Change in the discount rate

(3)

-

-

(3)

Unwinding of discount

6

2

-

8

Utilised

(2)

(5)

(1)

(8)

Acquisition of TNK-BP (Note 7)

25

17

4

46

As of December 31, 2013, including

94

33

11

138

Non-current

91

24

1

116

Current

3

9

10

22

 

Asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations represent an estimate of costs of wells liquidation, recultivation of sand pits, slurry ponds, disturbed lands and dismantling pipelines and power transmission lines. The budget for payments under asset retirement obligations is prepared on an annual basis. Depending on the current economic environment the entity's actual expenditures may vary from the budgeted amounts.

 

34. Long-term prepayment on oil supply agreements

 

During 2013 the Company entered into a number of long-term crude oil supply contracts which involve receipt of prepayment. The total minimum delivery volume approximates 400 million tons of crude oil.

 

The contracts include the following main terms:

prepayment amounts not to exceed 30% of the total contracted volume;

the crude oil price is calculated based on current market quotes;

the prepayment is reimbursed through physical deliveries of crude oil.

 

The prepayments will be reimbursed starting from 2015. The Company considers these contracts to be a regular way sale contracts which were entered into for the purpose of the delivery of a non-financial item in accordance with the Company's expected sale requirements.

 

2013

2012

As of January 1

-

-

Received

470

-

Less current portion

-

-

Reimbursed

-

-

As of December 31

470

-

 

35. Other non-current liabilities

 

Other non-current liabilities comprise the following:

 

As of December 31,

2013

2012

(restated)

Ruhr Oel GmbH liabilities due BP

16

13

Shelf projects liabilities

10

-

Liabilities for investing activities

1

2

Other

1

1

Total other non-current liabilities

28

16

 

Other non-current liabilities mostly comprise the Ruhr Oel GmbH pension and other liabilities due to BP group relating to BP group employees of Ruhr Oel GmbH plants.

 

36. Pension benefit obligations

 

Defined contribution plans

 

The Company makes payments to the State Pension Fund of the Russian Federation. These payments are calculated by the employer as percentage from the salary expense and are expensed as accrued.

 

The Company also maintains a defined contribution corporate pension plan to finance non-state pensions of its employees.

 

Pension contributions recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income was as follows:

 

2013

2012

2011

State Pension Fund

23

16

14

NPF Neftegarant

4

3

3

Total pension contributions

27

19

17

 

37. Shareholders' equity

 

Common shares 

 

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

Authorized common shares:

quantity, millions

10,598

amount, billions of RUB

0.6

Issued and fully paid shares:

quantity, millions

10,598

amount, billions of RUB

0.6

Nominal value of 1 common share, RUB:

0.01

 

Starting from 2011 the Company distributes dividends in the amount of 25% of IFRS net income, attributable to the Company's shareholders. According to Russian legislation the basis of distribution is identified as the current period net profit of OJSC Rosneft Oil Company calculated in accordance with Russian accounting standards.

 

On June 20, 2012, the annual General Meeting of Shareholders approved dividends on the Company's common shares for 2011 in the amount of RUB 37 billion or RUB 3.45 per share. RUB 33 billion of the above are related to outstanding shares, including dividend withholding tax on treasury shares. In August 2012, the approved dividends were paid.

 

On November 30, 2012, the extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders approved additional dividends on the Company's common shares for 2011 in the amount of RUB 42 billion or 4.08 per share. RUB 38 billion of the above are related to outstanding shares, including dividend withholding tax on treasury shares. In December 2012, the approved dividends were paid.

 

On June 20, 2013, the annual General Meeting of Shareholders approved dividends on the Company's common shares for 2012 in the amount of RUB 85 billion or RUB 8.05 per share. In the third quarter of 2013, the approved dividends were paid.

 

Treasury shares 

As of December 31,

2013

2012

number, millions

-

1,360

amount, billions of RUB

-

299

 

In June 2012, the Company purchased 321,963,949 of its own shares for RUB 68 billion or RUB 212 per share.

 

In August 2012, the Company transferred 185,794 of treasury shares to compensate independent members of the Company's Board of Directors for the period from June 10, 2011 to June 10, 2012 (Note 39). Both fair and carrying value of the above shares approximated RUB 0.04 billion.

 

In November 2012, the Company purchased 28,513,639 of its own shares for RUB 7 billion or RUB 249 per share.

 

In March 2013, the Company transferred 1,360,449,797 of its own shares to BP as a consideration for TNK-BP acquisition (Note 7).

 

Additional paid-in capital

2013

2012

Additional paid-in capital as of January 1

385

386

Sale of treasury shares (Note 7)

28

-

Sale of 9.99% of OJSC RN Holding shares

(125)

-

Voluntary offer to acquire OJSC RN Holding shares

189

-

Change in ownership interests in subsidiaries

-

(1)

Additional paid-in capital as of December 31

477

385

 

In 2012 the Company acquired additional shares in its two subsidiaries. The effect of these transactions in the total amount of RUB 1 billion was accounted for as a reduction of Additional paid-in capital.

 

In the third quarter of 2013 9.99% of shares in OJSC RN Holding ("RN Holding"), a subsidiary of the Company, were sold to certain unrelated third parties for a cash consideration of an aggregate RUB 97 billion. As these transactions did not result in a loss of control over RN Holding, the difference between the fair value of consideration transferred and the carrying amount of the disposed share of net assets is recognized in the additional paid-in capital.

 

On November 6, 2013 Rosneft announced a voluntary offer to acquire its securities held by minority shareholders. Under the terms of the voluntary offer, Rosneft plans to buy out 1,918,701,184 ordinary and 450,000,000 preferred shares of RN Holding. The offer price was set at RUB 67 per one ordinary share and RUB 55 per one preferred share of RN Holding. The voluntary offer term of 75 days expired on January 20, 2014. As of December 31, 2013, the Company recognized a liability due to non-controlling interest shareholders in the amount of RUB 153 billion in the other accounts payable, decrease in the non-controlling interest in the amount of RUB 342 billion and increase in the additional paid-in capital in the amount of RUB 189 billion. As of January 20, 2014 a number of shareholders, legal entities and individuals, have accepted the voluntary offer. Final results of the voluntary offer will be available in the first quarter of 2014.

 

38. Fair value of financial instruments

 

Fair value of financial assets and liabilities is determined as follows:

fair value of financial assets and liabilities quoted on active liquid markets is determined in accordance with the market quotes;

fair value of other financial assets and liabilities is determined in accordance with generally accepted models and is based on discounted cash flow analysis that relies on prices used for existing transactions in the current market;

fair value of derivative financial instruments is based on market quotes. If such quotes are unavailable, fair value is determined on the basis of valuation models that rely on assumptions confirmed by observable market prices or rates as of the reporting date.

 

Assets and liabilities of the Company that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the fair value hierarchy are presented in the table below.

 

Fair value measurement

as of December 31, 2013

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Assets:

Current assets

Held-for-trading

3

12

-

15

Available-for-sale

11

32

-

43

Non-current assets

Available-for-sale

-

4

-

4

Derivative financial instruments

-

1

-

1

Total assets measured at fair value

14

49

-

63

 

Fair value measurement

as of December 31, 2012

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Assets:

Current assets

Held-for-trading

13

8

-

21

Available-for-sale

5

15

-

20

Derivative financial instruments

-

3

-

3

Non-current assets

Available-for-sale

6

-

-

6

Derivative financial instruments

-

2

-

2

Total assets measured at fair value

24

28

-

52

 

There have been no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the period.

 

Fair value of financial assets available for sale, held-for-trading financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and derivative financial instruments included in Level 2 is measured at the present value of future estimated cash flows, using inputs such as market interest rates and market quotes of forward exchange rates.

 

Carrying value

Fair value (Level 2)

As of December 31,

As of December 31,

2013

2012 (restated)

2013

2012

(restated)

Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities at amortized cost:

Loans and borrowings with variable interest rate

(1,717)

(632)

(1,722)

(605)

Loans and borrowings with fixed interest rate

(643)

(348)

(639)

(338)

Financial liabilities at fair value, through profit or loss:

Derivative financial instruments

(6)

-

(6)

-

Financial lease liabilities

(12)

(11)

(12)

(11)

 

There have been no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the period.

 

39. Related party transactions

 

For the purposes of these consolidated financial statements, parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial or operational decisions. In 2011, 2012 and 2013 the Company entered into transactions with the following related parties: joint ventures and associates, enterprises directly or indirectly controlled by the Russian Government, key management, pension funds (Note 36).

 

Related parties may enter into transactions which unrelated parties might not, and transactions between related parties may not be effected on the same terms as transactions between unrelated parties.

 

Disclosure of related party transactions is presented on an aggregate basis for the companies directly or indirectly controlled by the Russian Government, joint ventures and associates, non-state pension funds. In addition, there may be an additional disclosure of certain significant transactions (balances and turnovers) with certain related parties.

 

In the course of its ordinary business, the Company enters into transactions with other companies controlled by the Russian Government. In the Russian Federation, electricity and transport tariffs are regulated by the Federal Tariff Service, an authorized governmental agency of the Russian Federation. Bank loans are recorded based on the market interest rates. Taxes are accrued and paid in accordance with the applicable tax law. The Company sells crude oil and petroleum products to related parties in the ordinary course of business at the prices close to average market prices. Gas sales prices in Russian market are regulated by the Federal Tariff Service.

 

Transactions with companies directly or indirectly controlled by the Russian Government

 

Revenues and income

2013

2012

2011

Oil and gas sales

102

94

28

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

58

30

25

Support services and other revenues

2

2

2

Finance income

2

18

7

164

144

62

 

Costs and expenses

2013

2012

2011

Production and operating expenses

13

8

10

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

2

-

-

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

318

187

181

Other expenses

8

17

7

Financial expenses

2

4

-

343

216

198

 

Other operations

2013

2012

2011

Purchase of financial assets and investments in associates

(8)

(6)

(9)

Sale of financial assets and investments in associates

15

-

1

Loans received

22

100

-

Loans repaid

-

(2)

(3)

Loans and borrowings issued

-

-

(1)

Repayment of loans and borrowings issued

1

-

-

Deposits placed

(56)

(10)

(30)

Deposits repaid

10

24

165

Repurchase of shares

-

(1)

-

 

Settlement balances

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

135

188

Accounts receivable

15

13

Prepayments and other current assets

25

15

Other financial assets

66

7

241

223

Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

9

15

Loans and borrowings

125

100

134

115

 

Transactions with joint ventures

 

Crude oil is purchased from joint ventures at Russian domestic market prices.

 

Revenues and income

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

Oil and gas sales

2

-

-

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

6

-

-

Support services and other revenues

6

2

3

Finance income

1

1

1

15

3

4

 

Costs and expenses

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

(restated)

Production and operating expenses

2

-

-

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

108

18

23

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

8

-

2

Other expenses

4

2

2

122

20

27

 

Other operations

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

Purchase of financial assets and investments in associates

4

-

-

Loans repaid

-

(2)

-

Loans and borrowings issued

(4)

-

-

Repayment of loans and borrowings issued

4

-

3

 

Settlement balances

As of December 31,

2013

2012

(restated)

Assets

Accounts receivable

5

5

Prepayments and other current assets

1

-

Other financial assets

4

-

10

5

Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

17

12

Loans and borrowings

1

-

18

12

 

Transactions with associates

 

Revenues and income

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

(restated)

Oil and gas sales

5

1

2

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

1

2

5

Support services and other revenues

1

1

2

Finance income

1

1

1

8

5

10

 

Costs and expenses

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

(restated)

Production and operating expenses

7

1

3

Other expenses

2

5

1

9

6

4

 

Other operations

2013

2012

2011

Purchase of financial assets

-

-

(5)

Loans and borrowings issued

(1)

(1)

-

Repayment of loans and borrowings issued

-

-

3

 

Settlement balances

As of December 31,

2013

2012

(restated)

Assets

Accounts receivable

1

2

Other financial assets

13

12

14

14

Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

2

1

2

1

 

Transactions with non-state pension funds

 

Costs and expenses

2013

2012

2011

Other expenses

3

3

3

 

Other operations

2013

2012

2011

Loans repaid

-

-

(1)

 

Compensation to key management personnel

 

For the purpose of these consolidated financial statements key management personnel includes: President of Rosneft, Vice-Presidents, members of the Board of Directors, members of the Management Board, members of the Audit Committee, directors of departments and heads of independent units, as well as others charged with governance. 

 

Short-term benefits of the key management personnel, including payroll, bonuses, personal income tax and social taxes, severance payments and contributions to insurance programs of the key management personnel amounted to RUB 8 billion, RUB 9 billion and RUB 4 billion in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 

 

On June 10, 2011, annual General Meeting of Shareholders decided to transfer to each of the following independent members of the Board of Directors of Rosneft Mr. Andrey L. Kostin, Mr. Alexander D. Nekipelov and Mr. Hans-Joerg Rudloff 25,238 shares of Rosneft, 20,821 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Andrey G. Reus and Mr. Nikolay P. Tokarev, each, 18,928 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Vladimir L. Bogdanov, and 14,021 shares of Rosneft to Sergey M. Bogdanchikov as a compensation for their services in the capacity of the Company's directors.

 

On June 20, 2012, annual General Meeting of Shareholders decided to transfer to each of the following independent members of the Board of Directors of Rosneft as a compensation for their services in the capacity of the Company's directors for the periods June 10, 2011 - September 13, 2011 and September 13, 2011 - June 20, 2012: 28,944 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Alexander D. Nekipelov, 26,925 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Andrey L. Kostin and Mr. Hans-Joerg Rudloff, each, 24,906 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Sergey V. Shishin, 22,213 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Nikolay P. Tokarev and Mr. Dmitry E. Shugaev, each, 17,408 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Vladimir L. Bogdanov and 16,260 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Matthias Warnig as a compensation for his services in the capacity of the Company's director for the period September 13, 2011 - June 20, 2012.

 

On June 20, 2013, annual General Meeting of Shareholders decided to transfer to each of the following independent members of the Board of Directors of Rosneft as a compensation for their services in the capacity of the Company's directors for the periods June 20, 2012 -November 30, 2012 and November 30, 2012 - June 20, 2013: 76,373 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Mattias Varnig and Mr. Michail V. Kuzovlev, each, 75,009 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Nikolay P. Laverov, 85,920 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Alexander D. Nekipelov, 79,101 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Hans-Joerg Rudloff and Mr. Sergey V. Shishin, each, 72,282 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Dmitry E. Shugaev and Mr. Ilia V. Scherbovich, each.

 

40. Key subsidiaries

 

Name

Country of incorporation

Core activity

2013

2012

Preferred and common shares

Voting shares

Preferred and common shares

Voting shares

%

%

%

%

Exploration and production

 OJSC Orenburgneft

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

-

-

OJSC Samotlorneftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

-

-

OJSC Tumenneftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

-

-

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

-

-

CJSC Vankorneft

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

93.96

93.96

93.96

93.96

RN-Yuganskneftegaz LLC

Russia

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

Refining, marketing and distribution

CJSC RORC

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

-

-

OJSC Angarsk Petrochemical Company

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Novokuybyshev Refinery

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Komsomolsky Refinery LLC

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Syzran Refinery

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Achinsk Refinery

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Kuybyshev Refinery

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Saratov Oil Refinery

Russia

Petroleum refining

85.48

91.13

-

-

CJSC PCEC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

-

-

OJSC TNK-Stolitsa

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

-

-

Rosneft Trading S.A.

Switzerland

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

Rosneft Trade Limited

Cyprus Republic

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

-

-

Other

OJSC RN Holding

Russia

Holding company

100.00

100.00

-

-

Neft-Aktiv LLC

Russia

Investing activity

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

Rosneft Finance S.A.

Luxemburg

Financе services

100.00

100.00

-

-

OJSC Russian Regional Development Bank (VBRR)

Russia

Banking

84.67

84.67

84.67

84.67

 

As of December 31, 2013, the ownership percentage was calculated based on the terms of the voluntary public offering of RN Holding shares (Note 37).

41. Contingencies

 

Russian business environment

 

Russia continues economic reforms and development of its legal, tax and regulatory frameworks as required by a market economy. The future stability of the Russian economy is largely dependent upon these reforms and developments and the effectiveness of economic, financial and monetary measures undertaken by the government.

 

Management believes it is taking appropriate measures to support the sustainability of the Company's business in the current circumstances.

 

Guarantees and indemnities issued

 

In the second quarter of 2013, the Company provided unconditional unlimited guaranty in favor of the Government and municipal authorities of Norway of potential ongoing ecological liabilities of RN Nordic Oil AS in respect of its operating activities on the Norwegian continental shelf. A parent company guarantee is required by the Norway Legislation and is an imperative condition for licensing the operations of RN Nordic Oil AS on the Norwegian continental shelf jointly with Statoil.

 

Parent Guarantes, Commercial Discovery bonus payment guarantee (under projects with Eni S.p.A. on the shelf of Russian Federation), Parent Agreement (under projects with Statoil АSА on the shelf of Russian Federation), Parent Agreement (under projects with ExxonMobil Oil Corporation on the shelf of Russian Federation) entered into in 2012 under Strategic Cooperation Agreement between Rosneft and Eni S.p.A, Rosneft and Statoil АSА, Rosneft and ExxonMobil Oil Corporation took effect in 2013. These guarantees are unconditional, unlimited and open-ended, and assuming that Rosneft will cover all potential ongoing liabilities under the terms of the projects on behalf of its associates. Under these agreements, the partners guarantee to each other the proper and timely performance of all obligations of its affiliated persons under above mentioned agreements entered into for the purpose of realization of Joint Agreements on the shelf of Russian Federation and also commercial discovery bonus payment assumed by the terms of Shareholders and Operating Agreements.

 

In 2013 the Company entered into the Parent Agreements with ExxonMobil Oil Corporation for seven new offshore projects. These guarantees effective the second quarter of 2014 are unlimited, unconditional and open-ended.

 

Legal claims

 

In 2006, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. ("Yukos Capital"), a former subsidiary of Yukos Oil Company, initiated arbitral proceedings against OJSC Yuganskneftegaz, which was subsequently merged into the Company, OJSC Samaraneftegaz, the Company's subsidiary, and Tomskneft, the Company's joint venture company, in various arbitration courts alleging default under nine RUB-denominated loans. The International Commercial Arbitration Court (the "ICAC") at the Russian Federation Chamber of Commerce and Industry issued four arbitration awards in favor of Yukos Capital against OJSC Yuganskneftegaz concerning four of the loans in the aggregate amount of approximately RUB 13 billion. Arbitration panel formed pursuant to the International Chamber of Commerce ("ICC") rules issued an award against OJSC Samaraneftegaz in the amount of RUB 3 billion in loan principal and interest plus post award interest of 9% p.a. on the above amount of loan principal and interest concerning two other loans. On February 12, 2007, the arbitration panel formed pursuant to the ICC rules issued an award against Tomskneft of RUB 4 billion plus interest of 9% per annum, plus default penalties of 0.1% per day (from December 1, 2005, through the date of the award), plus legal costs.

 

In 2007, the Company successfully challenged the ICAC awards and the ICAC awards were set aside by the Russian courts, including the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian Federation. Yukos Capital, nevertheless, sought to enforce the ICAC awards in the Netherlands. Although the district court in Amsterdam refused to enforce the ICAC awards on the ground that they were properly set aside by a competent court on April 28, 2009 the Amsterdam Court of Appeal reversed the district court's judgment and allowed Yukos Capital to enforce the ICAC awards in the Netherlands. On June 25, 2010, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands declared inadmissible the Company's appeal of the decision of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. Although the Company does not agree with the decisions of the Dutch courts above, on August 11, 2010 it complied with such decisions and arranged for relevant payments to be made with respect to the claim against the Company.

 

While the Dutch case was pending, Yukos Capital filed an additional lawsuit against the Company in the High Court of Justice in London, seeking enforcement of the ICAC awards in England and Wales, as well as interest on those awards.

 

Following the payments arranged by the Company noted above, Yukos Capital continues to seek statutory interest in the High Court of Justice in London in the amount of approximately RUB 5 billion as of the date of its Particulars of Claim. On June 14, 2011, the High Court issued an interim decision on two preliminary issues it had agreed to consider prior to reaching a decision on the merits of the claim. Although Yukos Capital prevailed on both issues, the court granted the Company leave to appeal, which it did. On June 27, 2012 the Court of Appeal of England handed down its judgment whereby the Company prevailed on one of these preliminary issues. No further appeals were requested by any party. Upon return of the case to the High Court of Justice, the court entered an order on February 27, 2013 providing for the hearing of further preliminary issues concerning whether the court has the power to enforce the annulled ICAC awards at English common law and whether in principle there is a basis for Yukos Capital to recover post-award interest in the English courts. The High Court of Justice scheduled the hearing of the further preliminary issues to be conducted on May 13-15, 2014. The Company intends to defend its position vigorously in the remaining proceedings in England.

 

In 2007, lawsuits were filed in Russian arbitrazh courts in Moscow, Samara and Tomsk to nullify the loan agreements with Yukos Capital. Court Hearings in all three cases were suspended for some time. However, on February 1, 2012 the Arbitrazh Court of the Samara Region declared invalid the loan agreements between Yukos Capital and OJSC Samaraneftegaz. On July 17, 2012, the 11th Arbitrazh Appellate Court dismissed Yukos Capital's appeal of that judgment. Yukos Capital filed a cassation appeal against both court decisions with the Federal Arbitrazh Court for Povolzhsky District, which on February 28, 2013 upheld the lower courts' judgments. On July 8, 2013, the Supreme Arbitrazh Court rejected Yukos Capital's supervisory appeal and upheld the lower courts' judgments. 

 

On July 11, 2012, the Moscow Arbitrazh Court declared invalid the loan agreements between Yukos Capital and OJSC Yuganskneftegaz. On October 9, 2012, the 9th Arbitrazh Appellate Court dismissed Yukos Capital's appeal of that judgment. Yukos Capital filed a cassation appeal against these judgments with the Federal Arbitrazh Court of Moscow District, which on March 14, 2013 upheld the judgments of the lower courts. Yukos Capital then applied for supervisory appeal to the Supreme Arbitrazh Court which by its ruling dated July 31, 2013 rejected Yukos Capital's supervisory appeal and upheld the lower courts' judgments.

 

On July 19, 2012 the Arbitrazh Court of the Tomsk Region declared void the loan agreements between Yukos Capital and Tomskneft. Yukos Capital filed an appeal on the decision. On June 3, 2013 the 7th Arbitrazh Appellate Court dismissed Yukos Capital's appeal of that judgment. On October 8, 2013, the Federal Arbitrazh Court for West-Siberian District rejected Yukos Capital's cassation appeal and upheld the judgments of the lower courts. On December 30, 2013, Yukos Capital filed a supervisory appeal with the Supreme Arbitrazh Court, the decision of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court is pending.

 

On July 2, 2010, Yukos Capital filed a petition with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "U.S. S.D.N.Y.") seeking confirmation of the ICC award against OJSC Samaraneftegaz noted above. In August 2010, Yukos Capital also commenced proceedings in the Arbitrazh Court of the Samara Region seeking enforcement of the same award in the Russian Federation.

 

On February 15, 2011, the Arbitrazh Court of the Samara Region denied Yukos Capital's enforcement application. The time for cassation appeal from the ruling has lapsed without Yukos Capital having filed such an appeal. On January 20, 2012, OJSC Samaraneftegaz filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of personal jurisdiction in the U.S. S.D.N.Y.

 

On July 24, 2012, the U.S. S.D.N.Y. granted summary judgment to Yukos Capital on the issue of personal jurisdiction over OJSC Samaraneftegaz in New York. Yukos Capital and OJSC Samaraneftegaz thereafter filed cross-motions for summary judgment concerning whether the U.S. S.D.N.Y. should enforce the award. On August 6, 2013, the U.S. S.D.N.Y. denied Samaraneftegaz's motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment for Yukos Capital. The U.S. S.D.N.Y. entered judgment for Yukos Capital in the amount of US$ 186 million (RUB 6 billion at the CBR official exchange rate at December 31, 2013). Samaraneftegaz has appealed the judgment. Its brief was filed on January 24, 2014. On January 9, 2014, the U.S. S.D.N.Y granted Yukos Capital's request for a turnover order and injunction to require Samaraneftegaz to use its assets to pay the above judgment or post a bond as well as to refrain from certain actions for so long as it has neither paid nor posted a bond. Samaraneftegaz intends to appeal the order and will defend its position vigorously in the appeal proceedings as well as against any further actions of Yukos Capital.

 

In February 2010, Yukos Capital commenced proceedings against Tomskneft in the Arbitrazh Court of the Tomsk Region seeking to enforce in Russia the abovementioned February 2007 ICC award. On July 7, 2010, the Arbitrazh Court of the Tomsk Region denied Yukos Capital's enforcement application. On October 27, 2010 Yukos Capital's cassation appeal was dismissed.

 

In July 2010, Yukos Capital brought an action against Tomskneft in the Paris Court of First Instance seeking enforcement of the February 2007 ICC award in France. On July 20, 2010, the court issued an ex parte order to allow enforcement. On February 22, 2011, Tomskneft timely filed an appeal against this order in the Paris Court of Appeal, which was granted on January 15, 2013, and the Paris Court of Appeal declared that the award could not be enforced in France. On August 6, 2013 Yukos Capital filed a brief on appeal to the French Court of Cassation seeking review of the Paris Court of Appeal's judgment declining enforcement. Tomskeft's brief was filed on December 5, 2013. The decision of the court is pending.

 

In February 2013, Yukos Capital initiated proceedings against Tomskneft in Ireland and Singapore seeking to enforce the same February 2007 ICC award whose recognition and enforcement was declined in Russia and France. Tomskneft has made an appearance in Ireland to challenge the court's jurisdiction. The court agreed with Tomskneft that its jurisdictional challenge should be heard before other issues. The court conducted a hearing on Tomskneft's motion to dismiss the proceedings on November 20-22, 2013 and the decision of the court is pending.

 

On February 19, 2013, Yukos Capital obtained an ex parte judgment granting its application for leave to enforce the same February 2007 ICC arbitral award in Singapore. Tomskneft filed on March 26, 2013 a brief responding submission. On July 3, 2013, the court heard Tomskneft's application that the issue of inadequate notice of the arbitral proceedings should be decided first and before Tomskneft fully presents all other defenses against enforcement. The judge decided to hear all grounds of defense at one time. On January 13, 2014 the judge granted in part Tomskneft's application for discovery. The hearing schedule in Singapore has not been fixed yet.

 

Yukos International (UK) B.V. has initiated proceedings in the Amsterdam District Court claiming damages of up to US$ 333 million (RUB 11 billion at the CBR official exchange rate at December 31, 2013), plus statutory interest with effect from February 7, 2011, plus costs, against Rosneft and other co-respondents unrelated to Rosneft relating to alleged injury supposedly caused by the entry of a freezing order in 2008 that Yukos International (UK) B.V. claims restricted its ability to invest certain funds as it chose. The first court date in this case was June 27, 2012. Rosneft filed its Statement of Defense on October 3, 2012. That statement asserts various defenses including that the court properly granted the freezing order and that Yukos International (UK) B.V. suffered no damages as a result of having its funds deposited in an interest bearing account of its choice.

 

Yukos International (UK) B.V. filed its Statement of Reply on February 20, 2013. Rosneft filed its Statement of Rejoinder on May 15, 2013. A hearing on the merits is scheduled for January 9, 2014. At that hearing Yukos International (UK) B.V. was granted permission to amend its claims against Rosneft. Now Yukos International (UK) B.V. filed claims against Rosneft also based on collective responsibility; the purpose of these requirements is to pass one of the co-defendants alleged responsibility for Rosneft. Rosneft will respond to these new claims of February 26, 2014.

 

The Company and its subsidiary participate in arbitral proceedings related to bankruptcy of OJSC Sakhaneftegaz and OJSC Lenaneftegaz for the recovery of certain loans and guarantees of indemnity in the amount of RUB 1 billion, stated above account receivable was reserved in full.

 

During 2009-2012, the Federal Antimonopoly Service ("FAS Russia") and its regional bodies claimed that the Company and some of its subsidiaries (associates) violated certain antimonopoly regulations in relation to petroleum products trading and passed respective decisions on administrative liability. As of December 31, 2013, the total amount of administrative fines levied by FAS Russia and its regional bodies against Rosneft and its subsidiaries is immaterial.

 

On March 7, 2011, Norex Petroleum Limited ("Norex") filed a lawsuit against OJSC Tyumen Oil Company ("TNK"), a predecessor of OJCS TNK-BP Holding, subsequently renamed to OJSC RN Holding, and certain other defendants in the amount of US$ 1.5 billion claiming the recovery of damages and compensation of moral damage caused by allegedly illegal takeover of the shares of LLC Corporation Yugraneft owned by Norex. The lawsuit was accepted by the Supreme Court of New York State (first instance court). On September 17, 2012, the Court dismissed Norex's action holding that it was time-barred. Norex filed an appeal against this judgment.

 

On April 25, 2013, the New York Appeal department confirmed that the dismissal of Norex's claim was justified. On May 28, 2013, Norex filed a motion for leave to appeal the decision affirming the lower court's dismissal of Norex's complaint to the New York Court of Appeals.

 

On September 12, 2013, New York Court of Appeals accepted Norex's claim. The hearing is expected in the first quarter of 2014, the judgment is expected to be delivered in the second quarter of 2014.

 

In 2013, several individuals, non-controlling shareholders of OJSC RN Holding, filed a number of lawsuits against the Company, claiming the right to get an offer from the Company to acquire the shares of OJSC RN Holding at the price the shares were measured in the course of TNK-BP acquisition by the Company. On October 25, 2013 Moscow Arbitrazh Court dismissed these claims. These decisions were upheld by the Court of Appeals on January 15 and 20, 2014.

 

The amount and timing of any outflow related to the above claims cannot be estimated reliably.

 

Rosneft and its subsidiaries are involved in other litigations which arise from time to time in the course of their business activities. Management believes that the ultimate result of those litigations will not materially affect the performance or financial position of the Company.

 

From September 2013, Rosprirodnadzor performed inspections of Rosneft and issued the report upon results of these inspections. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements administrative procedures have not been completed. The final outcome of the review will be announced after the completion by the inspection bodies of all procedures. The Company does not expect results of the examinations to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

 

Taxation

 

Legislation and regulations regarding taxation in Russia continue to evolve. Various legislative acts and regulations are not always clearly written and their interpretation is subject to the opinions of the local, regional and national tax authorities. Instances of inconsistent opinions are not unusual.

 

The current regime of penalties and interest related to reported and discovered violations of Russia's laws, decrees and related regulations is severe. Interest and penalties are levied when an understatement of a tax liability is discovered. As a result, the amounts of penalties and interest can be significant in relation to the amounts of unreported taxes.

 

In Russia tax returns remain open and subject to inspection for a period of up to three years. The fact that a year has been reviewed does not close that year, or any tax return applicable to that year, from further review during the three-year period.

 

Effective January 1, 2012, the market price defining rules were changed and the list of entities that could be recognized as interdependent entities and list of managed deals were expanded. Due to the absence of law enforcement precedents based on the new rules and certain contradictions in the provisions of the new law, such rules cannot be considered clear and precise. To eliminate influence of the significant risks associated with transfer pricing to the consolidated financial statements, the Company developed methods of pricing for all types of controlled transactions, a standard on preparation of reporting documentation, also the Company systematically researches databases to determine the market price level (ROI) of the controlled transactions.

 

In July 2013 the Company and Federal Tax Service signed the Pricing agreement in respect of taxation of oil sales transactions in Russia executed by the acquired TNK-BP companies starting from 2012.

 

In December 2012, the Company and Federal Tax Agency signed the Pricing Agreement for the purpose of taxation of oil sales transactions at the Russian market. Five Company subsidiaries also acted as the Parties to the Agreement. The document establishes the principles and methods of pricing in the aforementioned transactions. The Agreement was signed as part of the new order of fiscal control over the pricing of related party transactions to match the market parameters.

 

According to additions to part one of the Tax code of the Russian Federation, brought by the Federal law of the Russian Federation from November 16, 2011 No. 321-FZ, the Company created the Consolidated group of taxpayers which included 22 of subsidiaries of the Company, including Rosneft. Rosneft became a responsible taxpayer of the group.

 

From January 1, 2014 under the terms of the agreement, the number of members of the consolidated group of taxpayers is increased to 58. The Company management believes that creation of the consolidated group of taxpayers does not lead to significant changes of tax burden of the Company for the purpose of these consolidated financial statements.

 

During the reporting period, the tax authorities continued examinations of Rosneft and its certain subsidiaries for 2009-2012 fiscal years. Rosneft and its subsidiaries dispute a number of claims in pre-trial and trial appeal in federal tax service. The Company management does not expect results of the examinations to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet or results of operations.

 

As of December 31, 2013, the amount of VAT receivable, that is potentially unrecoverable from the tax authorities is immaterial. The Company currently reimburses the current VAT in full in a declarative manner.

 

Management believes that the above tax risks will not have any significant impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet or results of operations.

 

Overall, management believes that the Company has paid or accrued all taxes that are applicable. For taxes other than income tax, where uncertainty exists, the Company has accrued tax liabilities based on management's best estimate of the probable outflow of resources, which will be required to settle these liabilities. Potential liabilities which were identified by management at the reporting date as those that can be subject to different interpretations of tax laws and regulations are not accrued in the consolidated financial statements.

 

Capital commitments

 

The Company and its subsidiaries are engaged in ongoing capital projects for exploration and development of production facilities and modernization of refineries and the distribution network. The budgets for these projects are generally set on an annual basis.

 

The total amount contracted but not yet performed deliveries related to the construction and acquisition of property, plant and equipment amounted to RUB 328 billion and RUB 340 billion as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

Environmental issues

 

The Company periodically evaluates its environmental liabilities pursuant to environmental regulations. Such liabilities are recognized in the consolidated financial statements as identified. Potential liabilities, which might arise as a result of changes in existing regulations or regulation of civil litigation or changes in environmental standards cannot be reliably estimated but may be material. With the existing system of control, management believes that there are no material liabilities for environmental damage, other than those recorded in the consolidated financial statements.

 

Long-term contracts

 

On May 23, 2013 the Company entered into an agreement to create a joint venture to develop heavy oil reserves in Venezuela in the framework of the Carabobo-2 project with the Venezuelan Corporacion Venezolana del Petroleo, a subsidiary of PDVSA.

 

According to the agreement, the Company will pay a bonus of $1.1 billion (RUB 34 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of the date of transaction) for entering the project in two tranches (40% and 60%) and provide a loan of $1.5 billion (RUB 47 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of the date of transaction) to Corporacion Venezolana del Petroleo with the maximum yearly draw down of $0.3 billion (RUB 9 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of the date of transaction).

 

On November 14, 2013, Petrovictoria S.A., an entity for exploration of heavy crude oil in Venezuela in the framework of the Carabobo-2 project, was incorporated.

 

In June 2013 the Company entered into a crude oil supply agreement with PKN ORLEN S.A. to Czech Republic via Druzhba pipeline. The agreement provides a total amount of not more than 8.3 million tons of crude oil to be supplied at market prices during the period through June 30, 2016. In the third quarter of 2013 the Company started deliveries under the contract.

 

In June 2013 the Company and CNPC entered into long-term agreements for crude oil supplies to China for a period of 25 years. Price of each delivery will be determined by a formula based on the quoted market prices during the delivery period. Crude oil supplies under these agreements started in July 2013.

 

In September 2013 the Company and OJSC Enel OGK-5 entered into an agreement on the long-term gas supplies to Enel OGK-5. As part of the agreement the Company will deliver gas during the period from 2014 to 2025 to Konakovskaya, Sredneuralskaya and Nevinnomysskaya Power Stations of OGK-5. The agreement provides a total amount of approximately 51.4 billion cubic meters of gas.

 

In December 2013, Rosneft and American bank Morgan Stanley entered into an agreement to purchase Morgan Stanley unit engaged in trade, storage and transport of crude oil. The provisional amount of agreement is the market value of the net assets of the acquired company plus purchase costs. Completion is scheduled for the second half of 2014.

 

42. Events after the reporting period

 

In January 2014, the Company received prepayments on long-term oil supply contracts from a number of customers (Note 34).

 

43. Supplementary oil and gas disclosure (unaudited)

 

IFRS do not require that information on oil and gas reserves be disclosed. While this information was developed with reasonable care and disclosed in good faith, it is emphasized that the data represents management's best estimates. Accordingly, this information may not necessarily represent the current financial condition of the Company and its future financial results.

 

Company's activities are conducted primarily in Russia, which is considered as one geographic area.

 

Presented below are capitalized costs relating to oil and gas production

 

Consolidated subsidiaries and joint operations:

December 31,

2013

2012 (restated)

2011 (restated)

Oil and gas properties related to proved reserves

4,926

2,442

2,151

Oil and gas properties related to proved reserves for resale

94

-

-

Oil and gas properties related to unproved reserves for resale

50

-

-

Oil and gas properties related to unproved reserves

196

119

115

Total capitalized costs

5,266

2,561

2,266

Accumulated depreciation and depletion

(941)

(621)

(452)

Net capitalized costs

4,325

1,940

1,814

 

Presented below are costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves

 

Consolidated subsidiaries and joint operations:

 

For the years ended December 31:

2013

2012 (restated)

2011 (restated)

Acquisition of properties - proved oil and gas reserves

2,243

1

-

Acquisition of properties - unproved oil and gas reserves

128

5

7

Exploration costs

24

27

13

Development costs

345

301

260

Total costs incurred

2,740

334

280

 

Presented below are the results of operations relating to oil and gas production 

 

Consolidated subsidiaries and joint operations:

 

For the years ended December 31:

 

2013

2012 (restated)

2011 (restated)

Revenue

1,909

1,265

1,149

 

 

Production costs (excluding production taxes)

204

84

70

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

20

16

27

 

Exploration expense

17

23

13

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

329

167

164

 

Unwinding of discount

7

4

5

 

Taxes other than income tax

857

577

430

 

Income tax

62

77

65

 

Results of operations relating to oil and gas production

413

317

375

 

Reserve quantity information

 

For the purposes of evaluation of reserves as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 the Company used the oil and gas reserve information prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, independent reservoir engineers, prepared in accordance with United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) definitions. Proved reserves are those estimated quantities of crude oil and gas which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in the future from existing reservoirs under the existing economic and operating conditions. In certain cases, recovery of such reserves may require considerable investments in wells and related equipment. Proved reserves also include additional oil and gas reserves that will be extracted after the expiry date of license agreements or may be discovered as a result of secondary and tertiary extraction which have been successfully tested and checked for commercial benefit. Proved developed reserves are the quantities of crude oil and gas expected to be recovered from existing wells using existing equipment and operating methods.

 

Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage are limited to those drilling units offsetting productive units that are reasonably certain of production when drilled. Proved reserves for other undrilled units can be claimed only where it can be demonstrated with certainty that there is continuity of production from the existing productive formation. Under no circumstances are estimates of proved undeveloped reserves attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless those techniques have been proved effective by actual tests in the area and in the same reservoir. Due to inherent industry uncertainties and the limited nature of deposit data, estimates of reserves are subject to change as additional information becomes available.

 

The Company management included in proved reserves those reserves which the Company intends to extract after the expiry of the current licenses. The licenses for the development and production of hydrocarbons currently held by the Company generally expire between 2014 and 2053, and the licenses for the most important deposits expire between 2014 and 2053. In accordance with the effective version of the law of the Russian Federation, On Subsurface Resources (the "Law"), licenses are currently granted for a production period determined on the basis of technological and economic criteria applied to the development of a mineral deposit which guarantee rational use of subsurface resources and necessary environmental protection.

 

In accordance with the Law and upon gradual expiration of old licenses issued under the previous version of the Law, the Company extends its hydrocarbon production licenses for the whole productive life of the fields. Extension of the licenses depends on compliance with the terms set forth in existing license agreements. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, the Company is generally in compliance with all the terms of the license agreements and intends to continue complying with such terms in the future.

 

The Company's estimates of net proved oil and gas reserves and changes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are shown in the table below and expressed in million barrels of oil equivalent (oil production data was recalculated from tons to barrels using a field specific in the range from 6.71 to 8.87 barrels per ton, gas production data was recalculated from cubic meters to barrels of oil equivalent ("boe") using a ratio of 35.3/6 cubic meters per barrel).

 

Consolidated subsidiaries and joint operations:

 

As of years ended December 31:

 

2013

2012

(restated)

2011

(restated)

mln boe

mln boe

mln boe

Beginning of year

17,392

16,995

14,613

Beginning of year -reserves of associated companies as of December 31, 2012

970

Revisions of previous estimates

(437)

1,355

2,196

Extensions and discoveries

1,279

775

1,092

Improved recovery

51

-

-

Purchase of new reserves (Note 7)

13,063

1

-

Sale of reserves

-

(806)

-

Production

(1,530)

(928)

(906)

End of year

30,788

17,392

16,995

of which:

Proved reserves under PSA Sakhalin 1

76

87

95

Proved reserves of Tomskneft

613

619

643

Proved reserves of assets in Canada

5

1

-

Proved reserves of assets in Vietnam

27

-

-

Proved developed reserves

17,570

11,267

10,892

Minority interest in total proved reserves

161

118

109

Minority interest in proved developed reserves

123

86

71

 

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows and changes therein relating to proved oil and gas reserves

 

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows related to the above oil and gas reserves is calculated in accordance with the provisions set by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Estimated future cash inflows from oil, condensate and gas production are computed by applying the 12 month average prices (reference prices) calculated as unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12 month period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, to year-end quantities of estimated net proved reserves. Adjustment in this calculation for future price changes is limited to those required by contractual arrangements in existence at the end of each reporting period. Future development and production costs are those estimated future expenditures necessary to develop and produce estimated proved reserves as of year-end based on current expenses and costs and forecasts. In certain cases, future values, either higher or lower than current values, were used because of anticipated changes in operating conditions, but no general escalation that might result from inflation was applied. Estimated future income taxes are calculated by applying appropriate year-end statutory tax rates. These rates reflect allowable deductions and tax credits and are applied to estimated future net pre-tax cash flows, net of the tax bases of related assets.

 

Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using a 10% p.a. discount factor. Discounting requires a year-by-year estimates of future expenditures to be incurred in the periods when the reserves will be extracted.

 

The information provided in the table below does not represent management's estimates of the Company's expected future cash flows or of the value of its proved oil and gas reserves. Estimates of proved reserves change over time as new information becomes available. Moreover, probable and possible reserves which may become proved in the future are excluded from the calculations. The arbitrary valuation prescribed under provisions set by SEC requires assumptions as to the timing and the amount of future development and production costs. The calculations should not be relied upon as an indication of the Company's future cash flows or of the value of its oil and gas reserves.

 

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows:

 

Consolidated subsidiaries and joint operations:

 

2013

2012 (restated)

2011 (restated)

Future cash inflows

38,531

21,970

19,444

Future development costs

(2,995)

(1,169)

(1,018)

Future production costs

(20,796)

(11,314)

(10,255)

Future income tax expenses

(2,250)

(1,553)

(1,332)

Future net cash flows

12,490

7,934

6,839

Discount for estimated timing of cash flows

(7,461)

(4,730)

(4,018)

Discounted value of future cash flows as of the end of year

5,029

3,204

2,821

 

Share of other (minority) shareholders in discounted value of future cash flows

 

UOM

2013

2012 (restated)

2011 (restated)

Share of other (minority) shareholders in discounted value of future cash flows

RUB bln

25

29

32

 

Changes therein relating to proved oil and gas reserves

 

Consolidated subsidiaries and joint operations:

 

2013

2012 (restated)

2011 (restated)

Discounted value of future cash flows as of the beginning of year

3,204

2,821

2,275

Discounted value of future cash flows as of the beginning of year ( associated companies)

112

-

-

Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs and taxes other than income taxes

(828)

(588)

(622)

Changes in price estimates, net

(278)

260

341

Changes in future development costs

(177)

(118)

73

Development costs incurred during the period

345

301

260

Revisions of previous reserves estimates

(71)

151

223

Increase in reserves due to discoveries, less respective expenses

217

144

221

Net change in income taxes

83

30

(142)

Accretion of discount

332

282

228

Net changes due to purchases (sales) oil and gas fields

2,083

(68)

-

Effect of proportionate consolidation of OAO Tomskneft

(16)

24

105

Other

23

(35)

(141)

Discounted value of future cash flows as of the end of year

5,029

3,204

2,821

 

Company's share in costs, inventories and future cash flows of the joint ventures and associates

 

UOM

2013

2012 (restated)

2011 (restated)

Share in capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities (total)

RUB bln

139

81

31

Share in results of operations for oil and gas producing activities (total)

RUB bln

11

26

15

Share in estimated proved oil and gas reserves

mln boe

1,920

1,634

622

Share in estimated proved developed oil and gas reserves

mln boe

1,305

909

399

Share in discounted value of future cash flows

RUB bln

286

214

166

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED DECEMBER 31 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

 

The following discussion of Rosneft's financial condition and results of operations is based on, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company's financial statements and the notes thereto for the periods ended December 312013, 2012 and 2011 (the "Consolidated Financial Statements"). Such terms as "Rosneft", "Company" and "Group" in their different forms in this report mean Rosneft Oil Companyand its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliated companies, including TNKconsolidated subsidiaries. Such term as "TNK assets" refer to the acquisition of TNK group, including its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. This report presents Rosneft's financial condition and results of operations on a consolidated basis, including financial and operational results of TNK group since the date of acquisition. This report contains forward‑looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Rosneft's actual results may materiallydiffer from those discussed in such forward‑looking statements as a result of various factors.

Except as otherwise indicated, oil and gas reserves and production are presented pro-rata for companies accounted for on an equity basis or under the proportionate consolidation method and 100% for fully consolidated companies.

Except as otherwise indicated, all amounts are provided in billions of RUB. All figures are rounded; however, figures per unit of production are provided based on the actual data.

To convert tonnes to barrels a 7.362 ratio is used. To convert thousands of cubic meters of gas to barrels of oil equivalent a 5.883 ratio is used. Rospan gas condensate and natural gas liquids volumes are converted to barrels of oil equivalent at 8.3 and 10.6 barrels per ton, respectively.

Overview

Rosneft is a vertically integrated oil and gas company with core activities and assets located principally in Russia. The Company is primarily engaged in exploration and production of hydrocarbons, oil refining and product marketing.

OJSC Rosneft was established in accordance with the Russian Government Decree № 971, issued on September 29, 1995. From its foundation, the Company has expanded significantly through organic growth, consolidation of interests, acquisition of new companies and development of new businesses. Rosneft is now the leader of Russia's petroleum industry in terms of crude oil reserves and production operating in all key regions of the country.

Rosneft is one of the world's largest publicly traded companies in terms of proved hydrocarbon reserves and in terms of production. According to oil and gas reserve information prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, independent reservoir engineers,as of December 31, 2013 proved hydrocarbon reserves amounted to 41.77 billion barrels of oil equivalent, including 30.78 billion barrels of crude oil and NGL and 1,867 billion cubic meters of marketable gas, on the basis of the standards set forth by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Petroleum Reserves Management System ("PRMS").

Rosneft's crude oil and natural gas liquids production (NGL) amounts to 4.2 million barrels per day (in the fourth quarter of 2013) and output of natural and associated gas is 12.07 billion cubic meters.

Rosneft's domestic refinery throughput is 0.23 million tons per day (average for the fourth quarter of 2013) in Russia. Current utilization of the refining capacities is close to maximum adjusted for planned turnarounds. The remaining volumes of crude oil are mostly exported to Europe, Asia and CIS countries. Rosneft also holds a 50% stake in Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) where Rosneft processes both own and procured crude oil. Rosneft also processes crude oil, gas and petroleum products at external refineries (which are outside the Group).

Financial and Operating Highlights

For 3 months ended

% change between

 4th  and 3d quarters

For 12 months ended December 31

% change for 12 months ended December 31

December 31,

2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 - 2012

2012 - 2011

Financial results, RUB billion

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

 

 

1,350

1,356

 

 

(0.4)%

4,694

 

 

3,089

 

 

2,718

52.0%

 

 

13.6%

EBITDA

273

303

(9.9)%

947

618

662

53.2%

(6.6)%

Net income

134

2801

(52.1)%

551

365

335

51.0%

9.0%

Capital expenditures

182

130

40.0%

560

473

391

18.4%

21.0%

Adjusted free cash flow*

49

84

(41.7)%

201

43

99

367.4%

(56.6)%

Net Debt

1,860

1,909

(2.6)%

1,860

591

440

214.7%

34.3%

Operational results

Hydrocarbon production (th. boe per day)

4,989

4,884

2.1%

4,873

 

2,702

 

2,586

80.3%

 

4.5%

Crude oil and NGL production (th. barrels per day)

4,217

4,193

0.6%

4,196

2,439

2,380

72.0%

2.5%

Gas production (th.boe per day)

772

691

11.7%

677

263

206

157.4%

27.7%

Production of petroleum products

in Russia (mln tonnes)

20.57

21.88

(6.0)%

74.89

48.80

48.61

53.5%

0.4%

Production of petroleum products outside Russia (mln tonnes)

3.22

3.34

(3.6)%

12.22

10.79

7.30

13.3%

47.8%

*Excluding one-off effect from prepayments under long term oil contracts of RUB 470 billion in the twelve months of 2013

1 Including revaluation effect of TNK assets in the amount of RUB 167 billion (See p. 40 "Net income/(loss)").

 

TNK-BP acquisition

On 21 March 2013, Rosneft completed the acquisition of an aggregate 100% equity interest in TNK-BP Limited, the ultimate holding company of TNK-BP, and TNK Industrial Holdings Limited, its subsidiary. TNK-BP was Russia's third largest hydrocarbon producer operating in Russia's major hydrocarbon-bearing regions (including Western Siberia, Volga‑Urals and Eastern Siberia) with assets in the CIS, Venezuela, Vietnam and Brazil. The acquisition was carried out by way of two transactions, including (i) an acquisition of a 50% equity interest in TNK-BP from BP and (ii) an acquisition of a 50% equity interest in TNK-BP from the AAR consortium.

The financial results of TNK consolidated subsidiaries are included in Rosneft consolidated financial statements for the twelve months of 2013 since March 21, 2013 (date of acquisition).

As of December 31, 2012 proved hydrocarbon reserves of TNK-BP, according to oil and gas reserve information prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, independent reservoir engineers, amounted to 12.29 billion barrels of oil and 506 billion cubic meters of gas, on the basis of the standards set forth by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Petroleum Reserves Management System ("PRMS").

During the period from the date of acquisition, TNK assets were fully integrated in Company's production, refining, logistics and sales. As a result financial results of TNK group should not be read separately from the Company's financial results.

Business Segments and Intersegment sales

Substantially most of all of Rosneft's operations and assets are located in the Russian Federation. As geographical regions of the Russian Federation have similar economic and legal characteristics, Rosneft does not present geographical segments separately. Rosneft also carries out projects outside Russia, including exploration and production projects in Algeria, the Gudautsky area in the Black Sea territorial waters of Abkhazia, United Arab Emirates, Canada, Brazil, Vietnam, Venezuela and USA and also stakes in refineries in Germany and Italy.

Business Segments

As at the reporting date the activities of Rosneft are divided into two main business segments, based on the nature of their operations:

● Exploration and production (upstream). Geological exploration and development of fields and crude oil and gas production; and

● Refining and distribution (downstream). Refining of crude oil, as well as the purchase, transportation, sale and transshipment of crude oil and petroleum products.

Rosneft does not separate its distribution and transportation divisions into a "midstream" segment. These activities are reflected in the downstream segment. Other types of activities are incorporated in the "Corporate and other unallocated activities" segment and include banking, finance services and other activities.

Intersegment Sales

Rosneft's two main business segments are interconnected: the majority of the revenues of one main segment is included in the expenses of the other main segment. In particular, the Company, as the holding company, buys crude oil from its producing subsidiaries, part of which it sells to third parties in and outside Russia and the remainder of which it delivers to its proprietary, affiliated refineries or third party refineries for processing. Refined petroleum products are then either sold by the Company through wholesale sales in international or domestic markets or sold to the Company's marketing and transshipment Business Units and subsidiaries for subsequent wholesale and retail sale in Russia.

Significant events in the fourth quarter of 2013

 

Rosneft and NOVATEK completed Assets Swap

On December 27, 2013 Rosneft and NOVATEK completed assets swap. 40% of shares in Artic Russia B.V. held by Rosneft was swapped for 51% shares in Sibneftegas held by NOVATEK. Upon completion of the transaction, Rosneft, already holding a stake in Sibneftegas, consolidates 99.94% of shares in this company.

 

Rosneft obtained new licenses in North-West Siberia and Samara regions

Rosneft obtained new licenses for research, exploration and production in North -West Siberia, Udmurtya and Samara regions for RUB 4.5 billion.

Company placed 40 billion rubles in bonds

Rosneft has closed the placement of a total of 40 billion rubles in series Bo-05 and Bo-06 exchange-traded bonds.Coupon yield guidance was 7.95%-8.25%, corresponding yield of 8.11%-8.42% pa to offer in five years.

Rosneft announced the acquisition of oil trading business from Morgan Stanley

On December 20, 2013 the Company and Morgan Stanley (USA) signed a binding agreement to purchase the Global Oil Merchanting unit of Morgan Stanley Commodities division.

Rosneft acquired refuelling at the airport in Rostov-on-Don

On December 6, 2013 the Company's subsidiaries (LLC "RN-Aero" and LLC "RN-Trade") acquired 100% shares of JSC "Toplivozapravochny Kompleks (TZK) -AVIA", operator of refuelling complex at the airport in Rostov-on-Don.

Rosneft and Statoil plan to set up a joint venture

On December 6, 2013 Rosneft and Statoil signed the Shareholders and Operating Agreement for a joint venture to assess the feasibility of commercial production from the Domanik shale formation in licensed areas of the Company in the Samara region. The companies will set up a joint venture (JV) company to run a 3-year pilot programme and assess the potential for commercial production. The JV will be established with equity interests of 51% for Rosneft and 49% for Statoil. Both companies will contribute state-of-the-art technologies and professionals into the JV.

Rosneft and Oil Techno signed a joint venture agreement

 

On December 2, 2013 Rosneft and Oil Techno, signed a Shareholder Agreement as part of the plan to set up a joint venture. The JV's primary objective will be to provide Armenia with stable supplies of high quality petroleum products through wholesale and retail operations within the territory of the country as well as through the development of corresponding infrastructure for storage and distribution of petroleum products in Armenia.

 

Rosneft and Eni Agree Principal Terms of Trading Supply Deals and Cooperation in Logistics

On November 26, 2013 Rosneft and Eni signed a term sheet on mutual crude supply and a heads of agreement on logistics opportunities. These agreements outline principal terms of crude oil supply contracts to Eni refineries in Europe (Germany and Czech Republic) and joint participation and investments in logistics and commercial business.

 

Rosneft and Vietnam Oil and Gas Group PetroVietnam Signed Agreements for Offshore Projects Development

On November 12, 2013 Rosneft and Vietnam Oil and Gas Group signed Agreement on basic terms for geological survey, hydrocarbon exploration and production in the Pechora Sea.

Acquisition of 51% stake in Petroresurs

On October 2, 2013 Rosneft and Lundin Petroleum AB signed heads of agreement on Rosneft's acquisition of a 51% interest in Petroresurs LLC. Petroresurs LLC is owned 70% by Lundin Petroleum and 30% by Gunvor Group and holds exploration license for Lagansky offshore license block in the North-Eastern part of the Caspian Sea.

Rosneft consolidated 100% of Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha

On October 14, 2013 Rosneft acquired an additional 64.67% ownership interest in Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha LLC. The consolidation of Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha will boost the efficiency of Srednebotuobinsk oil and gas field development, which is one of the largest undeveloped fields in East Siberia, and will serve as foundation to create infrastructure for further exploration and development of the region's reserves. The control over Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha will enable Rosneft to book Srednebotuobinsk field reserves and to increase the Company's production volumes.

Effect from changes in accounting policies for comparative periods 2012

The Company adopted a package of standards on consolidation: IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements, IFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities. The package of new standards introduces the new model of control and treatment of joint arrangements and also new disclosure requirements. As a result of the application of the package the Company has changed from the equity method of accounting to accounting for the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses relating to the Company's interest in certain joint arrangements in accordance with the IFRSs applicable to the particular assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. This change requires restatement of previous financial statements.

Starting from January 1, 2013 the Company accounts for all financial and non financial results relating to its interest in JSC "Tomskneft" VNK and Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG). The presentation of processing fees related to Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) was changed. All operating expenses at Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) are included in operating expenses at refineries outside Russia.

For 3 months ended

% change

For 12 months ended

%

change

December 31,

2012 (restated)

December 31, 2012

December 31,

2012 (restated)

December 31, 2012

Financial results, RUB billion

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

792

790

0.3%

3,089

3,078

0.4%

EBITDA

145

144

0.7%

618

609

1.5%

Net income/(loss)

62

57

8.8%

365

342

6.7%

Capital expenditures

123

122

0.8%

473

466

1.5%

Free cash flow

13

13

-

43

45

(4.4)%

Net debt

591

581

1.7%

591

581

1.7%

Financial ratios

EBITDA margin

18.3%

18.2%

20.0%

19.8%

Net income margin

7.8%

7.2%

11.8%

11.1%

Net debt to annualised EBITDA

1.02

1.01

0.96

0.95

Current ratio

2.09

2.15

2.09

2.15

(RUR/bbl and RUR/t.)

EBITDA/bbl

665

689

(3.5)%

724

746

(2.9)%

Capital expenditures/bbl

348

359

(3.1)%

323

329

(1.8)%

Upstream operating expenses/bbl

104

95

9.5%

100

90

11.1%

Operating expenses at refineries in Russia/t.

699

694

0.7%

691

685

0.9%

Free cash flow/bbl

60

62

(3.2)%

50

55

(9.1)%

Operating results

Hydrocarbon production (th. boe per day)

2,823

2 823

-

2,702

2,702

-

Crude oil and NGL production (th. barrels per day)

2,479

2 479

-

2,439

2,439

-

Gas production (th.boe per day)

344

344

-

263

263

-

Production output in Russia (million tonnes)

12.56

12.56

-

48.80

48.80

-

Product output outside Russia (million tonnes)

2.77

2.77

-

10.79

10.79

-

 

Events after reporting date

Rosneft is planning to supply oil products to BP Oil International Limited

Rosneft Board of Directors approved the delivery to BP Oil International Limited of gasoil of 0.66 mln tons in the amount of USD 700 million. Rosneft will also supply to BP Oil International Limited fuel oil of 1.26 mln tons in the amount of USD 940 million and sulphur fuel oil of 1.32 mln tons in the amount of USD 1.2 billion.

Macroeconomic factors affecting results of operations

Main factors, affecting Rosneft's results of operations are:

· Changes in crude oil, petroleum product and gas prices;

· RUB/US$ exchange rate and inflation;

· Taxation including changes in mineral extraction tax, export customs duty and excises;

· Changes in tariffs of natural monopolies (for pipeline and railway transport);

· Changes in electricity prices.

Changes in prices, export customs duty and transport tariffs can have a significant impact on the mix of products and distribution channels the Company selects seeking to maximise netback prices of the produced crude oil.

Changes in Crude Oil, Petroleum Product and Gas Prices

World crude oil prices are highly volatile and fluctuate depending on the global balance of supply and demand and on numerous speculative factors. Crude oil exported by Rosneft via Transneft's (Russian pipeline monopoly) pipeline system is blended with crude oil of other producers that is of a different quality. The resulting Urals blend is traded at a discount to Brent. Crude oil exported via ESPO pipelineis sold at a price which is linked to the price of "Dubai" grade.

Petroleum product prices in international and Russian markets are primarily determined by the level of world prices for crude oil, supply and demand for petroleum products and competition on different markets. Price dynamics are different for different types of petroleum products.

The table below sets forth the average crude oil and petroleum product prices worldwide and in Russia in US$ and RUB. The prices nominated in US$ are translated into RUB at average US$/RUB exchange rate for the respective period.

For 3 months ended

change between 4d and 3th quarters

For 12 months ended December 31,

change for 12 months ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 - 2012

2012 - 2011

World market

(US$ per barrel)

%

(US$ per barrel)

%

Brent (dated)

109.3

110.4

(1.0)%

108.6

111.6

111.3

(2.7)%

0.3%

Urals (average Med and NWE)

108.5

109.7

(1.0)%

107.7

110.3

109.1

(2.3)%

1.1%

Urals (FOB Primorsk)

106.4

109.0

(2.4)%

106.2

109.0

108.2

(2.5)%

0.7%

Urals (FOB Novorossysk)

107.7

109.7

(1.8)%

107.1

109.5

108.3

(2.2)%

1.1%

Dubai

106.8

106.3

0.5%

105.5

109.1

106.2

(3.3)%

2.7%

(US$ per tonne)

(US$ per tonne)

Naphtha (av. FOB/CIF Med)

912

890

2.5%

884

918

915

(3.7)%

0.4%

Naphtha (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

927

905

2.5%

901

934

929

(3.6)%

0.5%

Naphtha (CFR Japan)

934

920

1.5%

918

943

938

(2.6)%

0.5%

Fuel oil (av. FOB/CIF Med)

582

598

(2.7)%

594

631

609

(5.9)%

3.7%

Fuel oil (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

575

593

(3.0)%

589

629

607

(6.4)%

3.5%

High sulphur fuel oil 180 cst(FOB Singapore)

612

607

0.8%

619

672

649

(7.9)%

3.5%

Gasoil (av. FOB/CIF Med)

930

929

0.1%

920

953

932

(3.4)%

2.3%

Gasoil (av. FOB

Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

930

930

0.1%

921

954

934

(3.4)%

2.2%

Gasoil (FOB Singapore)

924

916

0.9%

911

946

931

(3.7)%

1.6%

(th. RUB per barrel)

(th. RUB per barrel)

Brent (dated)

3.56

3.62

(1.8)%

3.46

3.47

3.27

(0.3)%

6.1%

Urals (average Med and NWE)

3.53

3.60

(1.8)%

3.43

3.43

3.21

0.0%

6.9%

Urals (FOB Primorsk)

3.46

3.58

(3.2)%

3.38

3.39

3.18

(0.2)%

6.6%

Urals (FOB Novorossysk)

3.50

3.60

(2.6)%

3.41

3.40

3.18

0.3%

6.9%

Dubai

3.48

3.49

(0.3)%

3.36

3.39

3.12

(0.9)%

8.7%

(th. RUB per tonne)

(th. RUB per tonne)

Naphtha (av. FOB/CIF Med)

29.7

29.2

1.7%

28.2

28.5

26.9

(1.2)%

5.9%

Naphtha (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

30.2

29.7

1.7%

28.7

29.0

27.3

(1.1)%

6.2%

Naphtha (CFR Japan)

30.4

30.2

0.7%

29.2

29.3

27.6

(0.2)%

6.2%

Fuel oil (av. FOB/CIF Med)

18.9

19.6

(3.5)%

18.9

19.6

17.9

(3.5)%

9.5%

Fuel oil (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

18.7

19.4

(3.8)%

18.8

19.5

17.8

(3.8)%

9.6%

High sulphur fuel oil 180 cst (FOB Singapore)

19.9

19.9

0.0%

19.7

20.9

19.1

(5.7)%

9.4%

Gasoil (av. FOB/CIF Med)

30.2

30.5

(0.7)%

29.3

29.6

27.4

(1.0)%

8.0%

Gasoil (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

30.3

30.5

(0.7)%

29.3

29.7

27.4

(1.2)%

8.4%

Gasoil (FOB Singapore)

30.1

30.0

0.1%

29.0

29.4

27.4

(1.3)%

7.5%

Russian market(net of VAT, including excise tax)

(th. RUB per tonne)

(th. RUB per tonne)

Crude oil

10.7

11.3

(5.3)%

10.6

10.2

8.9

3.4%

14.6%

Fuel oil

8.7

9.7

(9.4)%

8.8

9.2

8.8

(4.6)%

4.5%

Summer diesel

25.9

25.9

0.3%

25.3

23.2

19.7

9.0%

17.8%

Winter diesel

30.4

28.9

5.4%

28.5

25.3

21.9

12.8%

15.5%

Jet fuel

25.7

23.3

10.2%

23.9

23.3

20.7

2.4%

12.6%

High octane gasoline

28.4

29.4

(3.3)%

27.2

25.5

24.1

6.9%

5.8%

Low octane gasoline

25.6

25.4

1.0%

24.9

23.4

22.1

6.4%

5.9%

Difference between movement of prices denominated in US$ and those denominated in RUB is explained by nominal RUB appreciation against US$ by 0.8% in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to the third quarter of 2013 and nominal RUB depreciation against US$ by 2.4% in 2013 compared to 2012, nominal RUB depreciation against US$ by 5.8% in 2012 compared to 2011.

The Russian Government regulates the prices of the gas sold in Russia by Gazprom. While the regulated price has been rising in Russia and is expected to continue to rise to a level closer to parity with export netbacks, it is currently still significantly below this level.

The regulated price has affected, and is likely to continue to affect, the pricing of Rosneft gas sales. Rosneft's average gas sale price(net of VAT) was RUB 2.79 thousand per thousand cubic meters and RUB 2.97 thousand per thousand cubic meters in the fourth quarter of 2013 and third quarter of 2013, respectively.

In 2013 and 2012 average gas sale price (net of VAT) was RUB 2.63 thousand per thousand cubic meters and RUB 1.97 thousand per thousand cubic meters, respectively. In 2011 average gas sale price (net of VAT) was RUB 1.47 thousand per thousand cubic meters.

US$/RUB and EUR/RUB Exchange Rate and Inflation

The US$/RUB and EUR/RUB exchange rate and inflation in the Russian Federation affect Rosneft's results as most of the Company's revenues from sales of crude oil and petroleum products are denominated in US$, while most of the Company's expenses are denominated in RUB. Thus, the depreciation of the rouble positively affects Rosneft's operating income, while rouble appreciation has a negative effect.

The table below provides information on exchange rate movements and inflation during the periods analyzed:

For 3 months ended

For 12 months ended December 31

December 31,

2013

September 30,

2013

2013

2012

2011

Rouble inflation (CPI) for the period

1.7%

1.2%

6.5%

6.6%

6.1%

Average RUB/US$ exchange rate for the period

32.53

32.80

31.85

31.09

29.39

RUB/US$ exchange rate at the end of the period

32.73

32.35

32.73

30.37

32.20

Average RUB/EUR exchange rate for the period

44.28

43.44

42.31

39.95

40.88

RUB/EUR exchange rate at the end of the period

44.97

43.65

44.97

40.23

41.67

Source: CBR.

 

Taxation

The table below provides information on the average enacted tax rates specific to the Russian oil industry:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4d and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

% change for

12 months endedDecember 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 - 2012

2012 -

 2011

Mineral extraction tax

Crude oil (RUB per tonne)

5,472

5,631

(2.8)%

5,330

5,066

4,455

5.2%

13.7%

Natural gas (RUB per th. cubic meters)*

402

402

-

334

251

237

33.1%

5.9%

Associated gas (RUB per th. cubic meters)

0

0

-

0

0

0

-

-

Export customs duty for crude oil

Crude oil (US$ per tonne)

399.4

383.0

4.3%

392.1

404.3

408.9

(3.0)%

(1.1)%

Crude oil (RUB per tonne)

12,993

12,564

3.4%

12,489

12,570

12,017

(0.6)%

4.6%

Crude oil (RUB per barrel)

1,765

1,707

3.4%

1,697

1,718

1,643

(1.2)%

4.6%

East Siberian Crude oil (RUB per tonne)

12,993

12,564

3.4%

12,489

12,570

9,920**

(0.6)%

26.7%

East Siberian Crude oil (RUB per barrel)

1,765

1,707

3.4%

1,697

1,718

1,356**

(1.2)%

26.7%

Export customs duty for petroleum products

Gasoline (RUB per tonne)

11,692

11,306

3.4%

11,239

11,312

10,030

(0.6)%

12.8%

Naphtha (RUB per tonne)

11,692

11,306

3.4%

11,239

11,312

10,030

(0.6)%

12.8%

Light and middle distillates (RUB per tonne)

8,574

8,290

3.4%

8,242

8,295

8,054

(0.6)%

3.0%

Liquid fuels (fuel oil) (RUB per tonne)

8,574

8,290

3.4%

8,242

8,295

6,119

(0.6)%

35.6%

*Starting from July 1, 2013 mineral extraction tax on natural gas was increased. Starting from July 1, 2014 mineral extraction tax on natural gas will be increased according to Tax Code.

**A special export customs duty for crude oil produced at Verkhnechonsk and Vankor fields was in effect till May, 2011.

 

According to the legislation the excise tax rates on the petroleum products are linked to the environmental characteristics of the products.

Excise on petroleum products

2011

From 1 January

until

 June 30, 2012

From 30 June

until December 31, 2012

From 1 January until

 June 30, 2013

From 30 June

until December 31, 2013

2014

2015

High octane gasoline (RUB per tonne)

High octane gasoline non-compliant with euro-3,4,5 (RUB per tonne)

5,995

7,725

8,225

10,100

10,100

11,110

13,332

High octane gasoline euro-3 (RUB per tonne)

5,672

7,382

7,882

9,750

9,750

10,725

12,879

High octane gasoline euro-4 (RUB per tonne)

5,143

6,822

6,822

8,560

8,960

9,916

10,858

High octane gasoline euro-5 (RUB per tonne)

5,143

6,822

5,143

5,143

5,750

6,450

7,750

Naphtha (RUB per tonne)

6,089

7,824

7,824

10,229

10,229

11,252

13,502

Diesel (RUB per tonne)

Diesel below euro-3,4,5 (RUB per tonne)

2,753

4,098

4,300

5,860

5,860

6,446

7,735

Diesel euro-3 (RUB per tonne)

2,485

3,814

4,300

5,860

5,860

6,446

7,735

Diesel euro-4 (RUB per tonne)

2,247

3,562

3,562

4,934

5,100

5,427

5,970

Diesel euro-5 (RUB per tonne)

2,247

3,562

2,962

4,334

4,500

4,767

5,244

Lubricants (RUB per tonne)

4,681

6,072

6,072

7,509

7,509

8,260

9,086

 

Rosneft pays a significant portion of its revenues in taxes, as set out in the following table:

 

For 3 months ended

For 12 months ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

RUB billion

RUB billion

RUB billion

RUB billion

RUB billion

Total revenues

1,350

1,356

4,694

3,089

2,718

Total taxes*

702

710

2,487

1,677

1,378

Effective tax burden, %

52.0%

52.4%

53.0%

54.3%

50.7%

* Including export customs duty, mineral extraction tax, excise tax, income tax and other taxes.

 

The mineral extraction tax and the export customs duty accounted for approximately 47.0% and 45.3% of Rosneft's total revenues in the fourth quarter of 2013 and in the third quarter of 2013, respectively. In 2013, 2012 and 2011 the mineral extraction tax and the export customs duty accounted for approximately 47.1%, 47.1% and 44.3% of Rosneft's total revenues.

Mineral Extraction Tax

The rate of mineral extraction tax (MET) for crude oil is linked to the Urals price in the international market and changes every month. It is calculated in US$ per barrel of crude oil produced using average exchange rate for the respective month.

The mineral extraction tax rate1 in 2013 was calculated by multiplying the base rate of RUB 470 (starting from January 1, 2014 base rate increased to RUB 493, in 2015 base rate will be - RUB 530, in 2016 - RUB 559) by the adjustment ratio of ((Price ‑ 15) / 261) × Exchange rate, where "Price" is the average Urals price per barrel and "Exchange rate" is the average RUB/US$ exchange rate established by the Central Bank of Russia in the respective month, as well as factors which characterize the degree of depletion of a particular field, reserves of particular field and the degree of difficulty of extraction.

The Russian Tax Code provides for reduced or zero mineral extraction tax rate for crude oil produced at certain fields:

· the reduced rate is applicable to crude oil produced at the fields with reserve depletion rate of over 80%; for calculation of the reduced rate a special adjustment ratio (3.8 - 3.5 × reserve depletion rate) is applied; the reduced rate varies therefore from 0.3 to 1.0 of the standard rate;

· the zero tax rate is applicable to high-viscosity crude oil;

 

1 The mineral tax rate in 2012 was calculated by multiplying base rate of RUB 446 RUB.

· the zero tax rate is applicable during specific time period or for specific volumes of production (depending on what is achieved earlier) at fields in Yakutia, Irkutsk Region, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Nenets Autonomous District, Yamal Peninsula, Azov, Caspian and Black seas, sea of Okhotsk, offshore fields located to the north of the Arctic Circle (the exact time period and volume vary by regions where the field is located);

· the reduced tax rate is applicable to crude oil produced at the fields with the volume of initial recoverable reserves being less than 5 mln tonne and depletion level of reserves less or equal 0.05. For the calculation of reduced tax rate special coefficient should be used characterising the volume of reserves for a specific field (0.125 × value of initial oil recoverable reserves + 0.375);

· the reduced tax rate is applicable at fields: Bajenov, Abalaksk, Khadumsk, Domanikov, Tumensky formations and fields with permeability less than 2 × 10-3 mkm²

Rosneft benefits from the reduced mineral extraction tax rate as it has several fields with reserve depletion rate of over 80%.

Moreover its fields in Irkutsk Region and Krasnoyarsk Territory are subject to the zero mineral extraction tax rate which is applicable for the first 25 million tonnes of production and not more than 10 years period for a production license and not more than 15 years period for an exploration and production license.

On August 6, 2011 accumulated production at the Vankor oil field exceeded 25 million tons and zero MET rate was replaced by the standard one. In May 2012 the Company started developing Severo-Vankorsky area of Vankorskoye oil field and this area is subject to the zero MET rate (applicable for the first 25 million tonnes of production).

The zero mineral extraction tax is also applied to Verkhnechonsk field until its accumulated production exceeds 25 million tonnes.

Rosneft has exploration projects in the Azov, Okhotsk, Caspian, Barents, Kara and Black seas and participates in the Sakhalin-1 PSA which is subject to a special tax regime exempting the Company from paying mineral extraction tax.

The Company has exploration and production licenses for the fields with hard to recover reserves. On July 23, 2013 the amendments to tax law specifying special tax regime for these reserves were approved, which provide for tax exemptions for the projects at the fields with hard to recover reserves, including Bajenov, Abalaksk, Khadumsk, Domanikov and Tumensky formations, also oil from deposits with permeability of less than 2 x 10-3 mkm2. Effect from decreased tax rate for September - December 2013 amounted to RUB 926 million.

On September 30, 2013 the amendments to tax law specifying tax regime for offshore projects in the Russian Federation were approved. Following new tax amendments the offshore projects are categorised into one of four groups depending on its complexity and specifies MET rates for each project group ranging from 5% to 30% of international crude oil prices.

Export Customs Duty on Crude Oil

The rate of export customs duty on crude oil is linked to the Urals price in the international market and is denominated in US$ per tonne.

The table below sets forth the calculation of the ordinary export customs duty for crude oil:

Urals price (US$ per tonne)

Export customs duty(US$ per tonne)

Below and including 109.5 (15 US$ per barrel)...................................................

Export customs duty is not levied

Above 109.5 to and including 146(15 to 20 US$ per barrel).........................

35% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonne and US$ 109.5

Above 146 to and including 182.5(20 to 25 US$ per barrel).........................

US$ 12.78 plus 45% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonneand US$ 146

Above 182.5 (25 US$ per barrel)............

US$ 29.2 plus 60% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonneand US$ 182.5 (since October 1, 2011 till December 31, 2013)

US$ 29.2 plus 59% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonneand US$ 182.5 (since January 1 till December 31, 2014)

US$ 29.2 plus 57% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonneand US$ 182.5 (since January 1 till December 31, 2015)

US$ 29.2 plus 55% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonneand US$ 182.5 (since January 1 till December 31, 2016)

Starting from October 2011 the marginal export duty rate was reduced from 65% to 60% and is valid up to date.

The export customs duty is changed every month and the duty for the next month is based on the average Urals price for crude oil for the period from the 15th day of the previous month to the 14th day (inclusive) of the current month.

The draft law on the introduction of a special tax regime in respect of projects on the continental shelf of the Russian Federation provides for full exemption of hydrocarbons produced at offshore fields from the export customs duties, which commercial production will start from January 1, 2016. Such an exemption is set for various terms depending on the complexity of the field development project.

The government of the Russian Federation is entitled to establish special formulas for calculating the rates of export customs duties on crude oil in respect of:

- high-viscous oil - for a 10 years period starting from the date of application of the reduced export duty rate, but not later than January 1, 2023. The export customs duty rate is set at 10% of the established marginal export duty rate on oil.

- crude oil with special physical and chemical characteristics produced at certain crude oil fields. The export customs duty rate is set at 45% of the difference between the average Urals price denominated in US$ per tonne and the amount of US$ 365 per tonne.

 

Export customs duty on Eastern Siberian crude oil (Vankor and Verkhnechonsk)

Starting from July 1, 2010 the zero export duty rate applied for production of crude oil with specific physicochemical characteristics at a number of fields in Eastern Siberia (the Vankor and Verkhnechonsk fields) was replaced by a special rate calculated as (Price-50) × 0.45, where "Price" is average Urals price in US$ per barrel used for the calculation of ordinary export duty.

Starting from May 1, 2011 the Vankor and Verkhnechonsk fields were excluded from the list of fields subject to the special export duty rate.

Export customs duty on crude oil export to CIS

Export duties are not payable on crude oil exports to CIS countries that are members of the Customs Union. In accordance with the Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of Belarus dated January 27, 2010 crude oil exports to Belarus within specific limits established by the Russian Ministry of Energy are exempted from export duty until January 1, 2012. Starting from January 1, 2012 zero export duty rate is applicable to the crude oil exports to Belarus as for export to Kazakhstan. No new amendments were introduced in 2013 in respect of regime of export customs duty on crude oil export to CIS.

 

Export Customs Duty on Petroleum Products

Export customs duty on petroleum products (except LPG, (liquefied petroleum gas)) is set every month as the marginal export customs duty rate on crude oil multiplied by the estimated ratio depending on the type of petroleum product.

Export customs duty on LPG is based on the average price of LPG at Poland board (DAF Brest) denominated in US$ per tonne for the period from the 15th day of the previous month to the 14th day (inclusive) of the current month.

In January 2011 export customs duties on light and dark petroleum products were calculated using special formula, and amounted to 71% (for light petroleum products) and 38% (for dark petroleum products) of the export duty for crude oil.

Starting from February 2011 the export duties for petroleum products were directly linked to export duty for crude oil and were set at 67% of the export duty for crude oil for light products and at 46.7% of the export duty for crude oil for dark products.

Starting from May 1, 2011 the Russian Government introduced a special export duty for gasoline equivalent to 90% of the export duty for crude oil. Starting from June 1, 2011 the Russian Government introduced a special export duty for naphtha equivalent to 90% of the export duty for crude oil.

Starting from October 2011 the export duty for light petroleum products (excluding gasoline and nafta) was lowered from 67% to 66% of export duty for crude oil, the export duty for dark petroleum products was raised from 46.7% to 66% of export duty for crude oil. Export duty for naphtha and gasoline remained at 90% of crude oil export duty. These rates are effective as at the reporting date.

Starting from January 1, 2014 the export duty rate for diesel fuel was lowered from 66% to 65%.

Changes in Transport Tariffs of Pipeline and Railway Monopolies

Rosneft transports most of its crude oil and petroleum products via pipeline network owned and operated by Transneft, which is a natural state-owned pipeline monopoly. Rosneft also transports crude oil and petroleum products via railway network owned and operated by Russian railways (RZD), another natural state-owned monopoly.

The Federal Tariff Service (the FTS), a governmental body regulating natural monopolies, sets Transneft's base tariffs for transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in Russia, which include a dispatch tariff, a pumping tariff, loading, charge-discharge, transshipment and other tariffs. Tariffs for railroad transportation are also regulated by the FTS. The tariffs are set in roubles and are not linked to the exchange rate.

The FTS sets tariffs for each separate route of the pipeline networks depending on the length of the relevant routes, transportation direction and other factors, alternatively tariffs may be set for the entire route of the pipeline network. Tariffs for railroad transportation often depend on the type of cargo and the transportation route.

Recent changes of Transneft transportation tariffs

Petroleum products

Starting from January 2013, Transneft increased tariffs by 6.6% on average for export transportation and by 4.6% on average for domestic transportation of petroleum products.

Starting from November 8, 2013 a special multiplying ratio of 1.134 was introduced on the export transportation of stable natural gasoline via land border in the direction of the Baltic countries.

In January 2012 Transneft increased tariffs by 8.6% on average for export transportation and by 6.1% on average for domestic transportation of petroleum products. Starting from August 1, 2012 tariffs for pipeline transportation of petroleum products for Rosneft increased by 5.4% for domestic transportation and by 3% for export transportation.

The tariffs for export transportation of petroleum products increased by 10.0% and tariffs for domestic transportation of petroleum products increased by 8.6% in 2012 compared with 2011.

Crude oil

Starting from February 1, 2013 Transneft increased tariffs for crude oil transportation by 9.7% on average in Belarus. In December 2013, the FTS set fixed tariff of RUB 108.2 per tonne (excluding VAT) in the direction of "Purpe- Samotlor" following the mutual agreement between the Governments of Russia and China. The tariff is agreed by Transneft and Rosneft for 36 months period for the purpose of extending the capacity of the pipeline "Skovorodino-Mohe".(This tariff does not impact current tariffs for oil transportation by the branch of ESPO pipeline to China).

Starting from November 2012 Transneft increased tariffs for crude oil transportation by 5.5% on average while the network tariff for ESPO (Kozmino and China) increased by 10.2%. Transneft revised and increased the tariff for Rosneft's major transportation route "Yugansk - Primorsk" and route "Yugansk - Novorossiysk" by 3.5% and 6.8%, respectively. On year-average basis for the routes represented in the table below, tariffs for pipeline transportation of crude oil for export and domestic supplies increased by 4.9% in 2012 compared with 2011 while the tariff for Rosneft's major transportation route "Yugansk - Primorsk" on year-on-year average basis increased by 14.8% in 2012 compared with 2011.

Starting from September 2011 Transneft increased tariffs for crude oil transportation by 2.85% on average. Starting from November 2011 Transneft still increased tariffs for crude oil transportation by 5.0% on average.

Recent changes in railroad transportation tariffs

In January 2013 tariffs for railroad transportation inside Russia were increased by 9.0% on average. Transportation tariffs outside Russia were differentiated depending on the type of cargo from -15% to +6%.

In January 2012 tariffs for railroad transportation were increased by 6.0% on average.

In January 2011 tariffs for railroad transportation were increased by 8.0% on average. There were no other changes in tariffs were during 2011.

 

Rosneft average transportation tariffs applied to major transportation routes denominated in RUB for the respective periods:

 

for 3 months

ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

for 12 monthsended December 31,

change for12 months ended

December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 - 2012

2012 - 2011

(th. RUB/tonne)

(%)

(th. RUB/tonne)

(%)

CRUDE OIL

Domestic

Pipeline

Yugansk - Samara refineries

0.79

0.79

-

0.79

0.75

0.73

5.3%

2.7%

Samara - Samara refineries

0.05

0.05

-

0.05

0.05

0.05

-

-

Yugansk - Angarsk refinery (long route)

-

1.26

1.21

-

4.1%

Purneftegaz - Angarsk refinery (long route)

1.56

1.56

1.42

Purpe - Tuapse refinery

1.65

1.65

1.65

1.57

1.50

5.1%

4.7%

Tomsk - Achinsk refinery

0.36

0.27

0.34

0.33

(20.6)%

3.0%

Purneftegaz - Achinsk refinery (long route)

1.07

0.71

Orenburgneft (Krotovka)- Saratov refinery

0.27

0.27

Orenburgneft (Pokrovka) - Saratov refinery

0.34

0.34

0.34

Samotlor - Ryazan

1.23

1.23

1.24

RN-Uvatneftegaz - Ryazan

1.06

1.06

1.06

Samotlor - Komsomolsk refinery (short route)

0.54

0.54

0.54

Samotlor - Angarsk refinery (short route)

0.94

0.94

0.94

Pipeline and railroad

Yugansk - Komsomolsk refinery

4.14

3.93

5.3%

Purneftegaz - Komsomolsk refinery (long route)

4.55

4.55

4.55

Yugansk -RNPK

1.15

1.15

0.77

Export

Pipeline

Yugansk - Primorsk

1.60

1.60

1.60

1.55

1.35

3.2%

14.8%

Yugansk - Novorossiysk

1.59

1.59

1.59

1.50

1.46

6.0%

2.7%

Vankor (Purpe)-Kozmino / China

2.08

2.08

2.08

1.92

1.84

8.3%

4.3%

Samara - Novorossiysk

0.85

0.85

0.85

Yugansk - Germany

1.61

1.61

1.60

1.54

3.9%

Yugansk - Poland

1.53

1.53

1.53

1.45

1.33

5.5%

9.0%

Yugansk - Belarus (Naftan) (South Balyk)

1.71

1.28

1.40

(8.6)%

Yugansk - Belarus (Naftan) (Karkateevy)

1.50

1.50

1.47

1.31

2.0%

12.2%

Orenburgneft (Pokrovka) - Mozyr refinery

0.89

Samotlor - Novorossiysk

1.68

Verkhnechonskneftegaz - Kozmino

2.08

2.08

2.08

Railroad

Stavropolneftegaz - CPC

0.75

0.75

0.75

0.68

0.66

10.3%

3.0%

 

for 3 months

ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

for 12 monthsended December 31,

change for12 months ended

December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 - 2012

2012 - 2011

(th. RUB/tonne)

(%)

(th. RUB/tonne)

(%)

PETROLEUM PRODUCTS EXPORT

Diesel

Samara refineries - Ventspils

2.20

2.08

5.8%

2.08

1.89

1.73

10.1%

9.2%

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

4.44

4.44

4.44

4.16

3.89

6.7%

6.9%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

1.74

1.74

1.74

1.63

1.53

6.7%

6.5%

Achinsk refinery - Tuapse

5.01

5.01

5.01

4.69

4.38

6.8%

7.1%

RNPK - Ventspils

2.42

2.42

2.40

RNPK - Primorsk

1.87

1.88

(0.5)%

1.89

YANOS - Primorsk

1.64

1.65

(0.6)%

1.65

 

Fuel oil

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

4.43

4.43

4.43

4.14

3.96

7.0%

4.5%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

1.67

1.67

1.67

1.56

1.48

7.1%

5.4%

Achinsk refinery - Nakhodka

5.68

5.68

5.68

5.30

4.89

7.2%

8.4%

RNPK - Ust-Luga

2.31

2.33

(0.9)%

2.32

RNPK - Estonia

2.54

2.55

(0.4)%

2.54

SNPZ - Kerch

2.90

2.76

5.1%

2.86

YANOS - Estonia

2.04

2.05

(0.5)%

2.04

Naphtha

Samara refineries - Tuapse

2.07

2.07

2.07

1.93

1.87

7.3%

3.2%

Achinsk refinery - Tuapse

4.86

4.86

4.86

4.58

4.30

6.1%

6.5%

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

4.19

4.19

4.19

3.92

3.78

6.9%

3.7%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

1.71

1.71

1.71

1.60

1.50

6.9%

6.7%

Nizhnevartovsk NPO - Ventspils

3.76

3.52

6.8%

3.52

Source: Transneft, RZD, Rosneft. Mixed export tariffs include transshipment at non-Rosneft terminals. The data is provided for major routes at each direction

 

Rosneft operates proprietary transportation and transshipment facilities. This allows optimisation of Company's logistics (netbacks). These facilities include: the Arkhangelsk, De-Kastri, Tuapse and Nakhodka export terminals, the Okha - Komsomolsk-on-Amur pipeline, Vankor-Purpe pipeline and the Caspian Pipeline Consortium ("CPC"). In Caspian Pipeline Consortium Rosneft has a 7.5% stake through a joint venture "Rosneft Shell Caspian Ventures Ltd" (Cyprus) (Rosneft owns 51%).

Operating Results

Production of Crude Oil and NGL

Rosneft has main fully consolidated production and development enterprises, which produce crude oil in Western Siberia, Eastern Siberia, Timan Pechora, Central Russia, southern part of European Russia and the Russian Far East. The Company also has a 20% stake in the Sakhalin-1 project and a 50% stake in JSC "Tomskneft" VNK, both accounted for using proportionate consolidation method. In addition, Rosneft participates in major production joint ventures accounted for using the equity method: Udmurtneft - 49.54%, Polar Lights - 50.0% and Slavneft - 49.94%. The Company also participates in international projects in Vietnam and Venezuela.

The following table sets forth Rosneft's crude oil and NGL production1:

For 3 months ended

Changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 monthsended December 31,

Change for 12 monthsended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -

2012

2012 -

2011

(million of barrels)

(%)

(million of barrels)

(%)

Yuganskneftegaz (Western Siberia)

122.6

122.3

0.2%

487.2

488.8

488.1

(0.3)%

0.1%

Samaraneftegaz (Central Russia)

20.7

20.7

81.1

78.8

77.6

2.9%

1.5%

Purneftegaz (Western Siberia)

11.8

11.9

(0.8)%

47.5

50.7

51.3

(6.3)%

(1.2)%

Vankorneft (Eastern Siberia)

40.2

40.2

157.8

133.9

109.7

17.8%

22.1%

Severnaya Neft (Timan Pechora)

5.5

5.6

(1.8)%

22.7

25.7

26.6

(11.7)%

(3.4)%

Sakhalin-1 (Far East)(net of royalty and government share)

2.3

2.3

8.7

8.7

10.0

(13.0)%

Tomskneft (Western Siberia)

9.5

9.5

37.4

37.44

(1.3)%

Samotlorneftegas

43.7

43.8

(0.2)%

136.4

Orenburgneft

38.8

38.3

1.3%

119.4

Verkhnechonskneftegaz

14.5

14.3

1.4%

44.6

RN-Uvatneftegaz

17.7

17.3

2.3%

52.8

Varyeganneftez

14.1

13.9

1.4%

43.5

RN-Nyaganneftegaz

11.8

11.9

(0.8)%

36.9

Taas Yuryakh5

1.6

1.6

Other

8.8

9.0

(2.2)%

34.5

29.9

32.5

15,3%

(8.0)%

Crude oil and NGL production by fully

and proportionately consolidated enterprises

363.6

361.0

0.7%

1,312.1

853.9

795.8

53.7%

7.3%

JSC "Tomskneft" VNK (Western Siberia)

-

-

37.9

-

Udmurtneft (Central Russia)

6.0

5.9

1.7%

23.6

23.5

23.2

1.3%

1.3%

Polar Lights (Timan Pechora)

0.4

0.4

-

1.6

1.9

2.2

(15.8)%

(13.6)%

Verkhnechonskneftegaz (Eastern Siberia) 3

-

3.1

13.3

9.5

(76.7)%

40.0%

Slavneft

15.1

15.4

(1.9) %

47.9

Other

2.9

3.1

(6.5)%

9.3

Total share in production of associates

24.4

24.8

(1.6)%

85.5

38.7

72.8

120.9%

46.8%

Total crude oil and NGL production

388.0

385.8

0.6%

1,397.6

892.6

868.6

56.6%

2.8%

Daily crude oil production

(th. barrels per day)

4,217

4,193

0.6%

4,196

2,439

2,380

72.0%

2.5%

1 For information: all production volumes of new assets are included from acquisition date. Pro Forma of the Company's crude oil production in comparative periods of 2013 and 2012 is presented in Appendix 1.

2 For information: to convert tonnes to barrels a 7.315 ratio was used in 2012 and 2011.

3 Before the date of acquisition of TNK assets.

4 Tomskneft is presented with effect of retrospective changes in the accounting policy.

5 Crude oil production from acquisition date

In the fourth quarter of 2013 Rosneft's average daily crude oil and NGL production was 4,217 th. barrels per day, which is an increase of 0.6 % compared with the third quarter of 2013. The increase in production level was due to organic production growth at Brownfields mainly due to launch of new wells and efficient drilling program. Efficient drilling program is realised at Vankor and Uvat Brownfields. The Company also accelerates the launch of new fields at Western Siberia and Eastern Siberia and also extending activity at fields with hard to recover reserves.

In 2013 organic daily crude oil and NGL production growth of 1.0% (excluding associates) was due to production increase at Vankorneft and Samaraneftegas fields compared to same period of 2012.

In 2012 Rosneft's average daily crude oil production was 2.5% higher than in 2011. The growth was driven primarily by production increase at Vankorneft, Verkhnechonskneftegaz, Samaraneftegaz, Udmurtneft and Yuganskneftegaz fields, which was partially offset by production decrease at Sakhalin-1 and Timan Pechora.

Production of Gas

The table below sets forth Rosneft's commercial gas* production1:

For 3 months ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 monthsended December 31,

change for 12 monthsended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 - 2012

2012 - 2011

(bcm)

(%)

(bcm)

(%)

Purneftegaz (Western Siberia)

1.06

1.06

4.17

4.07

3.71

2.5%

9.7%

Yuganskneftegaz (Western Siberia)

1.07

0.98

9.2%

3.78

3.16

2.86

19.6%

10.5%

Krasnodarneftegaz (Southern Russia)

0.85

0.73

16.4%

3.06

2.90

2.73

5.5%

6.2%

Samaraneftegaz (Central Russia)

0.13

0.12

8.3%

0.50

0.53

0.50

(5.7)%

6.0%

Severnaya Neft (Timan Pechora)

0.07

0.06

16.6%

0.26

0.29

0.26

(10.3)%

11.5%

Vankorneft (Eastern Siberia)

0.27

0.11

145.5%

0.63

0.47

0.37

34.0%

27.0%

Sakhalin-1 (Far East)(net of royalty and government share)

0.12

0.07

71.4%

0.40

0.34

0.31

17.6%

9.7%

JSC "Tomskneft" VNK (Western Siberia)

0.24

0.19

26.3%

0.86

0.843

-

2.4%

-

NGK "Itera" LLC

3.32

2.95

12.5%

6.27

-

-

-

-

Samotlorneftegaz

1.43

1.37

4.4%

4.33

-

-

-

-

Rospan International

0.98

0.91

7.7%

2.93

-

-

-

-

Orenburgneft

0.79

0.65

21.5%

2.18

-

-

-

-

Varyeganneftez

0.79

0.71

11.3%

2.33

-

-

-

-

TNK-Nyagan

0.38

0.36

5.6%

1.12

-

-

-

-

Other

0.43

0.41

4.9%

1.67

1.13

1.25

47.8%

(9.6)%

Gas production by fully and proportionately consolidated enterprises

11.93

10.68

11.7%

34.49

13.73

11.99

151.2%

14.5%

JSC "Tomskneft" VNK (Western Siberia)

-

-

0.73

NGK "Itera" LLC

-

3.23

2.62

-

23.3%

-

Slavneft

0.10

0.10

-

0.31

-

-

Other

0.04

0.04

-

0.14

0.04

0.07

250.0%

(42.9)%

Total share in production of joint ventures

0.14

0.14

-

3.68

2.66

0.80

38.3%

>100%

Total gas production

12.07

10.82

11.6%

38.17

16.39

12.79

132.9%

28.1%

Natural gas

6.03

5.37

12.3%

18.54

7.28

4.68

154.7%

55.6%

Associated gas

6.04

5.45

10.8%

19.63

9.11

8.11

115.5%

12.3%

* Production volume equals extracted volume minus flared volume.

1 For information: all production volumes of acquired assets are included from acquisition date. Pro Forma of the Company's gas production in comparative periods of 2013 and 2012 is presented in Appendix 1.

2 Before the date of acquisition of additional shares.

3 JSC "Tomskneft" VNK is presented with effect of retrospective changes in the accounting policy.

In the fourth quarter of 2013 Rosneft's gas production at Company's subsidiaries was 12.07 bcm, which was 11.6% higher than in the third quarter of 2013, including the effect of consolidation of NGK "Itera" LLC. High organic gas production growth at Brownfields was attributable to sustainable gas compressor operations and mode optimization of gas supplying pipelines at Yuganskneftegaz, start of gas drive recovery at Vankor fields and increase in seasonal gas supply to consumers in Krasnodar region (Krasnodarneftegaz).

Increase in gas production and gas monetization strategy is one of Companies' priority objects. Rosneft manages the increase in construction of gas gathering facilities at Rospan and Purneftegaz fields.

In 2013 Rosneft's gas production was significantly higher than in 2012, mainly due to NGK "Itera" LLC acquisition and incorporation of gas production results of new production units. Organic gas production growth was 2.4%* (excluding associates) mainly at Yuganskneftegaz,Vankorneftegaz, Purneftegaz and Krasnodarneftegaz. Currently, the Company participates in significant gas projects in Yamalo-Nenetsky district and Western Siberia, develops gas resources at continental shelf and demonstratessustainableproduction growth in comparative periods.

In 2012 Rosneft's natural and associated gas production was significantly higher than in 2011, mainly due to NGK "Itera" LLC acquisition which lead to the overall increase in gas production by 2.62 bcm. Excluding the effect of NGK "Itera" LLC acquisition, gas production growth by 0.98 bcm year-on-year was due to the number offactors: stable operations at the Luguinetskaya compressor station of JSC "Tomskneft" VNK in 2012, higher crude oil production at the Vankor field and at the Priobskoe field of Yuganskneftegaz, the launch of compressor stations at the Komsomolskoe field of Purneftegaz in September 2011 and the construction of gas pipeline to the fields of Severnaya Neft.

Rosneft is implementing a programme aimed at increasing associated gas utilisation rate. The programme envisages construction of gas gathering facilities, booster compression stations and underground storage facilities as well as gas power stations.

*Estimated by pro-forma data presented in Appendix 1.

 

Petroleum Product Output

Rosneft processes produced and procured crude oil at its refineries: the Tuapse refinery on the Black Sea in the South of Russia, the Komsomolsk refinery in the Russian Far East, the Achinsk and Angarsk refineries in Eastern Siberia and the Kuibyshev, Novokuibyshevsk and Syzran refineries in the Samara region (European part of Russia). Rosneft also owns production capacity at four Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) refineries in Germany.

The Company increased significantly processing at refineries in Russia and outside Russia due to production capacities at Saratov, Ryazan, Yaroslav regions, Nignevartovsk and due to oil processing in Belarus under processing agreement.

The following table sets forth Rosneft's crude oil processing and petroleum product output volumes. 1

For 3 months ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 monthsended December 31,

change for 12 monthsended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 - 2012

2012 - 2011

(million of tonnes)

(%)

(million of tonnes)

(%)

Crude oil processing at Rosneft's own refineries in Russia

21.41

22.63

(5.4)%

77.78

50.85

50.65

53.0%

0.4%

Crude oil processing at refineries outside Russia

3.24

3.39

(4.4)%

12.34

10.73

7.21

15.0%

48.8%

including crude oil processing at Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG)

2.78

2.76

0.7%

10.60

10.73

7.21

(1.2)%

48.8%

including crude oil processing in Belarus

0.46

0.63

(27.0)%

1.74

-

-

-

-

Total group crude oil processing

24.65

26.02

(5.3)%

90.12

61.58

57.86

46.3%

6.4%

Petroleum product output:

High octane gasoline

2.80

2.99

(6.4)%

10.08

5.34

5.33

88.8%

0.2%

Low octane gasoline

0.06

0.04

50.0%

0.19

0.35

0.35

(45.7)%

-

Naphtha

1.33

1.37

(2.9)%

4.64

3.67

3.83

26.4%

(4.2)%

Diesel

6.64

6.93

(4.2)%

24.08

17.22

17.25

39.8%

(0.2)%

Fuel oil

7.01

7.22

(2.9)%

25.28

16.39

16.91

54.2%

(3.1)%

Jet fuel

0.79

0.99

(20.2)%

3.01

1.50

1.20

100.7%

25.0%

Petrochemicals

0.22

0.15

46.7%

0.70

0.53

0.54

32.1%

(1.9)%

Other*

1.72

2.19

(21.5)%

6.91

3.80

3.20

81.8%

18.8%

Product output at Rosneft's own refineries in Russia

20.57

21.88

(6.0)%

74.89

48.80

48.61

53.5%

0.4%

Product output at refineries outside Russia

3.22

3.34

(3.6)%

12.22

10.79

7.3

13.3%

47.8%

including crude oil output at Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG)

2.79

2.75

1.4%

10.60

10.79

7.3

(1.8)%

47.8%

including product output in Belarus

0.43

0.59

(27.1)%

1.62

-

-

-

-

Total group product output

23.79

25.22

(5.7)%

87.11

59.59

55.91

46.2%

6.6%

*including production of petroleum products at gas refineries

1 For information: all production volumes of acquired assets are included from acquisition date. Pro Forma of the Company's crude oil processing in comparative periods of 2013 and 2012 is presented in Appendix 1.

In the fourth quarter of 2013 Rosneft's total refinery throughput amounts to 24.65, lower by 5.3% compared with the third quarter of 2013. The refinery throughput inside Russia reduced by 1.22 mln tons mainly due to planned turnarounds at Syzran, Saratov and Ryazan refineries.

Following the turnarounds in previous periods the throughput at German refineries increased by 0.7%.

Organic growth of oil throughput in Russia amounts to 1.7%* in 2013 compared with 2012 and was due to global refineries modernization. Oil throughput at Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) refineries slightly decreased in 2013 compared with 2012 due to unscheduled turnarounds at Gelsenkirchen refinery, PCK Schwedt refinery and Bayernoil refinery.

In 2012 Rosneft's refinery throughput was 6.4% higher than in 2011 mainly due to the acquisition of a 50% stake in Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) in May 2011. Throughput at Russian refineries increased by 0.4%. Increase in jet fuel production resulted from change in output structure of the Syzran refinery following the demand growth.

*Estimated by pro-forma data presented in Appendix 1.

 

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the statement of income information both in absolute values and respective changes over the analyzed periods:

For 3 months ended

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

Change

% of total revenue

% of total revenue

%

(RUB billion, except %)

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

Oil and gas sales

712

52.8%

691

51.0%

3.0%

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

620

45.9%

648

47.8%

(4.3)%

Support services and other revenues

18

1.3%

14

1.0%

28.6%

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

0

0%

3

0.2%

(100.0)%

Total revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

1,350

100.0%

1 356

100.0%

(0.4)%

Costs and expenses

Production and operating expenses

121

9.0%

99

7.3%

22.2%

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

120

8.9%

138

10.2%

(13.0)%

General and administrative expenses

32

2.4%

33

2.4%

(3.0)%

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

111

8.2%

108

8.0%

2.8%

Exploration expenses

6

0.4%

5

0.4%

20.0%

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation

123

9.1%

120

8.8%

2.5%

Taxes other than income tax

286

21.2%

291

21.5%

(1.7)%

Export customs duty

401

29.7%

379

27.9%

5.8%

Total cost and expenses

1,200

88.9%

1 173

86.5%

2.3%

Operating income

150

11.1%

183

13.5%

(18.0)%

Finance income

7

0.5%

7

0.5%

-

Finance expenses

(16)

(1.2)%

(11)

(0.8)%

45.5%

Other income

35

2.6%

158

11.7%

(77.8)%

Other expenses

(13)

(1.0)%

(26)

(1.9)%

(50.0)%

Foreign exchange differences

(14)

(1.0)%

9

0.7%

-

Income before income tax

149

11,0%

320

23.6%

(53.4)%

Income tax expense

(15)

(1.1)%

(40)

(2.9)%

(62.5)%

Net income

134

9.9%

280

20.6%

(52.1)%

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

Foreign exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

-1

(0.1)%

3

0.2%

>100.0%

Gain/(loss) from changes in fair value of financial assets available for-sale

0

-

0

0.0%

-

Total other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

(1)

(0.1)%

3

0.2%

>100.0%

 

20.9%

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

133

9.8%

283

(53.0)%

 

The table below provides information on the Results of Operations for the period 2013, 2012 and 2011:

For 12 months ended December 31,

% change

2013

2012

2011

2013 -2012

2012 -2011

(RUB billion)

(%)

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

Oil and gas sales

2,428

1,526

1,392

59.1%

9.6%

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

2,196

1,498

1,265

46.6%

18.4%

Support services and other revenues

58

42

45

38.1%

(6.7)%

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

12

23

16

(47.8)%

43.8%

Total revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

4,694

3,089

2,718

52.0%

13.6%

Costs and expenses

Production and operating expenses

389

247

189

57.5%

30.7%

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

432

319

298

35.4%

7.0%

General and administrative expenses

111

68

52

63.2%

30.8%

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

392

241

216

62.7%

11.6%

Exploration expenses

17

23

13

(26.1)%

76.9%

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation

392

206

193

90.3%

6.7%

Taxes other than income tax

1,024

672

498

52.4%

34.9%

Export customs duty

1,382

901

790

53.4%

14.1%

Total cost and expenses

4,139

2,677

2,249

54.6%

19.0%

Operating income

555

412

469

34.7%

(12.2)%

Finance income

21

24

20

(12.5)%

20.0%

Finance expenses

(56)

(15)

(19)

>100.0%

(21.1)%

Other income

242

87

25

>100.0%

>100.0%

Other expenses

(59)

(50)

(48)

18.0%

4.2%

Result of operations with foreign currency, foreign exchange differences

(71)

11

(22)

-

-

Income/ (loss) before income tax

632

469

425

34.8%

10.4%

Income tax expense

(81)

(104)

(90)

(22.1)%

15.6%

Net income/ (loss)

551

365

3351

51.0%

9.0%

Other comprehensive income/ (loss)

Foreign exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

(11)

2

(1)

>100.0%

-

Gain/(loss) from changes in fair value of financial assets available for-sale

3

(3)

1

>100.0%

-

Total other comprehensive income/ (loss), net of tax

(8)

(1)

-

>100.0%

-

Total comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

543

364

335

49.2%

8.7%

1 Corrected in line with retrospective changes in the accounting policy due to adoption of new standards, refer to "Effect from changes in accounting policies for comparative periods 2012"

 

For 3 months ended

For 12 months ended

December 31,

2013

September 30,

2013

December 31,

2013

December 31,

2012

December 31,

2011

EBITDA

273

303

947

618

662

Operating income margin

11.1%

13.5%

11.8%

13.3%

17.3%

Share of pipeline and transportation costs in revenue

8.2%

8.0%

8.4%

7.8%

7.9%

Net income margin

9.9%

20.6%

11.7%

11.8%

12.3%

* The difference between percents presented here and in the sections is a result of rounding

 

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

In the fourth quarter of 2013 revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures amounted to RUB 1,350 billion or downturn 0.4%, due to decrease in world market crude oil price.

In 2013 revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures was RUB 4,694 billion or upturn 52.0%, which was driven by TNK assets acquisition, and was offset by decrease in world market prices. Urals price decreased by 2.3 % and the world market prices for diesel and fuel oil denominated in RUB fell down by 1.2% and 3.8% respectively.

In 2012 revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures were 13.6% higher compared to 2011, that was driven by increase in sales volumes and price. Urals price increased by 1.1% and the world market prices for diesel and fuel oil denominated in RUB rose by 8.4% and 9.6% respectively.

The table below presents revenues from sales of crude oil, gas, petroleum and petrochemical products and other revenues in billions of RUB*:

For 3 months

ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

change for12 months

ended

December 31,

December

 31, 2013

September

 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

 2013 -

2012

 2012 -

2011

%

of total revenue

%of total revenue

%

%of total revenue

%of total revenue

%of total revenue

%

(RUB billion, except %)

Crude oil

International Sales to non-CIS

608

45.2%

596

43.9%

2.0%

2,116

45.1%

1,421

46.0%

1,321

48.6%

48.9%

7.6%

Europe and other directions

451

33.6%

444

32.7%

1.6%

1,574

33.6%

1,033

33.4%

955

35.1%

52.4%

8.2%

Asia

157

11.6%

152

11.2%

3.3%

542

11.5%

388

12.6%

366

13.5%

39.7%

6.0%

International sales to CIS

41

3.0%

36

2.7%

13.9%

128

2.7%

78

2.5%

54

2.0%

64.1%

44.4%

Domestic

22

1.6%

24

1.8%

(8.3)%

81

1.7%

5

0.2%

3

0.1%

>100.0%

66.7%

Total crude oil

671

49.8%

656

48.4%

2.3%

2,325

49.5%

1,504

48.7%

1,378

50.7%

54.6%

9.1%

Gas

41

3.0%

35

2.6%

17.1%

103

2.2%

22

0.7%

14

0.5%

>100.0%

57.1%

Petroleum products

International Sales to non-CIS

322

23.8%

336

24.8%

(4.2)%

1,165

24.8%

856

27.7%

712

26.2%

36.1%

20.2%

Europe and other directions

235

17.4%

265

19.6%

(11.3)%

871

18.5%

628

20.3%

488

18.0%

38.7%

28.7%

Asia

87

6.4%

71

5.2%

22.5%

294

6.3%

228

7.4%

224

8.2%

28.9%

1.8%

International Sales to CIS

25

1.9%

32

2.4%

(21.9)%

84

1.8%

11

0.4%

8

0.3%

>100.0%

37.5%

Domestic

230

17.0%

239

17.6%

(3.8)%

794

16.9%

497

16.1%

448

16.4%

59.8%

10.9%

Wholesale

132

9.7%

141

10.4%

(6.4)%

455

9.7%

297

9.6%

270

9.9%

53.2%

10.0%

Retail

98

7.3%

98

7.2%

0.0%

339

7.2%

200

6.5%

178

6.5%

69.5%

12.4%

Sales of bunker fuel to end-users

16

1.2%

19

1.4%

(15.8)%

59

1.3%

50

1.6%

37

1.4%

18.0%

35.1%

Total petroleum products

593

43.9%

626

46.2%

(5.3)%

2,102

44.8%

1,414

45.8%

1,205

44.3%

48.7%

17.3%

Petrochemical products

27

2.0%

22

1.6%

22.7%

94

2.0%

84

2.7%

60

2.2%

11.9%

40.0%

International sales

23

1.7%

20

1.5%

15.0%

82

1.7%

73

2.3%

50

1.8%

12.3%

46.0%

Domestic

4

0.3%

2

0.1%

100.0%

12

0.3%

11

0.4%

10

0.4%

9.1%

10.0%

Support services and other revenues

18

1.3%

14

1.0%

28.6%

58

1.2%

42

1.4%

45

1.7%

38.1%

(6.7)%

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

0

0.0%

3

0.2%

(100.0)%

12

0.3%

23

0.7%

16

0.6%

(47.8)%

43.8%

Total sales

1,350

100.0%

1,356

100.0%

(0.4)%

4,694

100.0%

3,089

100.0%

2,718

100.0%

52.0%

13.6%

\* The difference between percentages presented in the above table and in this section is a result of rounding

 

Sales Volumes

The table below analyses crude oil, gas, petroleum and petrochemical product sales volumes:

For 3 months

ended

Changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

Change for12 months

ended

December 31,

December

 31, 2013

September

 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

 2013 -

2012

 2012 -

2011

Crude oil

mln

bbls

%of total volume

mln

bbls

%of total volume

%

mln

bbls

%of total volume

mln

bbls

%of total volume

mln

bbls

%of total volume

%

International Sales to non-CIS

180.4

46.1%

171.6

43.4%

5.1%

644.2

45.4%

438.2

46.9%

433.8

48.9%

47.0%

1.0%

Europe and other directions

131.8

33.7%

124.4

31.5%

5.9%

468.2

33.0%

306.5

32.8%

301.4

34.0%

52.8%

1.7%

Asia

48.6

12.4%

47.2

11.9%

3.0%

176.0

12.4%

131.7

14.1%

132.4

14.9%

33.6%

(0.5)%

CIS

20.6

5.3%

18.4

4.7%

12.0%

72.1

5.1%

47.5

5.1%

33.6

3.8%

51.8%

41.4%

Domestic

12.6

3.2%

13.2

3.4%

(4.5)%

50.1

3.5%

3.7

0.4%

2.2

0.2%

>100.0%

68.2%

Total crude oil

213.6

54.6%

203.2

51.5%

5.1%

766.4

54.0%

489.4

52.4%

469.6

52.9%

56.6%

4.2%

Crude oil

mln t

mln t

mln t

mln t

mln t

International Sales to non-CIS

24.5

46.1%

23.3

43.4%

5.1%

87.5

45.4%

59.9

46.9%

59.3

48.9%

47.0%

1.0%

Europe and other directions

17.9

33.7%

16.9

31.5%

5.9%

63.6

33.0%

41.9

32.8%

41.2

34.0%

52.8%

1.7%

Asia

6.6

12.4%

6.4

11.9%

3.0%

23.9

12.4%

18.0

14.1%

18.1

14.9%

33.6%

(0.5)%

CIS

2.8

5.3%

2.5

4.7%

12.0%

9.8

5.1%

6.5

5.1%

4.6

3.8%

51.8%

41.4%

Domestic

1.7

3.2%

1.8

3.4%

(4.5)%

6.8

3.5%

0.5

0.4%

0.3

0.2%

>100.0%

68.2%

Total crude oil

29.0

54.6%

27.6

51.5%

5.1%

104.1

54.0%

66.9

52.4%

64.2

52.9%

56.6%

4.2%

Petroleum products

International Sales to non-CIS

12.7

23.9%

13.4

24.9%

(5.2)%

47.5

24.6%

33.2

25.9%

30.5

25.2%

43.1%

8.9%

Europe and other directions

9.3

17.5%

10.8

20.0%

(13.9)%

35.8

18.5%

24.7

19.2%

21.1

17.4%

44.9%

17.1%

Asia

3.4

6.4%

2.6

4.9%

30.8%

11.7

6.1%

8.5

6.7%

9.4

7.8%

37.6%

(9.6)%

International Sales to CIS

0.9

1.7%

1.1

2.1%

(18.2)%

3.1

1.6%

0.5

0.4%

0.4

0.3%

>100.0%

25.0%

Domestic

8.8

16.6%

9.7

18.1%

(9.3)%

31.8

16.5%

21.4

16.8%

21.4

17.7%

48.6%

0.0%

Wholesale

6.0

11.3%

6.7

12.5%

(10.4)%

21.6

11.2%

14.6

11.5%

14.9

12.3%

47.9%

(2.0)%

Retail

2.8

5.3%

3.0

5.6%

(6.7)%

10.2

5.3%

6.8

5.3%

6.5

5.4%

50.0%

4.6%

Sales of bunker fuel to end-users

0.9

1.7%

1.0

1.9%

(10.0)%

3.3

1.7%

2.8

2.2%

2.5

2.1%

17.9%

12.0%

Total petroleum products

23.3

43.9%

25.2

47.0%

(7.5)%

85.7

44.4%

57.9

45.3%

54.8

45.3%

48.0%

5.7%

Petrochemical products

0.8

1.5%

0.8

1.5%

0.0%

3.1

1.6%

2.9

2.3%

2.2

1.8%

6.9%

31.8%

International sales

0.6

1.1%

0.6

1.1%

0.0%

2.3

1.2%

2.2

1.8%

1.5

1.2%

4.5%

46.7%

Domestic

0.2

0.4%

0.2

0.4%

0.0%

0.8

0.4%

0.7

0.5%

0.7

0.6%

14.3%

0.0%

Total crude oil and products

53.1

100.0%

53.6

100.0%

(0.9)%

192.9

100.0%

127.7

100.0%

121.2

100.0%

51.1%

5.4%

Gas

bcm

bcm

bcm

bcm

bcm

Sales Volumes

14.55

11.90

22.3%

39.07

11.08

9.74

>100.0%

13.8%

 

Average Crude Oil and Petroleum Product Sales Prices 

The following table sets forth Rosneft's average export and domestic prices of crude oil, gas and petroleum products (the average sales prices may differ from official market prices provided by specialized agencies due to different quality of products and sales terms):

For 3 months ended

% change between4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months ended

% change for12 months ended

December 31,

December 31,

2013

September 30,

2013

December 31,

2013

December 31,

2012

December 31,

2011

Average prices on foreign markets

(th.RUB/barrel)

(th.RUB/tonne)

(th.RUB/barrel)

(th.RUB/tonne)

2013

(th.RUB/barrel)

(th.RUB/tonne)

(th.RUB/barrel)

(th.RUB/tonne)

(th.RUB/barrel)

(th.RUB/tonne)

 2013 -2012

 2012 -2011

Crude oil, excluding CIS

3.39

25.0

3.47

25.5

(2.0)%

3.29

24.2

3.24

23.7

3.04

22.3

2.1%

6.3%

Europe and other directions

3.45

25.4

3.56

26.2

(3.1)%

3.37

24.8

3.37

24.6

3.17

23.2

0.8%

6.0%

Asia

3.23

23.8

3.23

23.8

0.0%

3.08

22.7

2.95

21.6

2.76

20.2

5.1%

6.9%

Crude oil, CIS

1.92

14.1

1.92

14.1

0.0%

1.76

13.0

1.66

12.1

1.61

11.8

7.4%

2.5%

Petroleum products, non- CIS

25.3

25.1

0.8%

24.5

25.8

23.4

(5.0)%

10.3%

Europe and other directions

25.2

24.6

2.4%

24.3

25.4

23.2

(4.3)%

9.5%

Asia

25.8

27.2

(5.1)%

25.2

26.8

23.9

(6.0)%

12.1%

Petroleum products, CIS

27.2

29.7

(8.4)%

27.0

23.4

21.8

15.4%

7.3%

Average domestic prices

Crude oil

1.70

12.5

1.81

13.3

(6.0)%

1.61

11.9

1.40

10.3

1.39

10.2

15.5%

1.0%

Petroleum products

25.9

24.6

5.3%

24.9

23.1

20.9

7.8%

10.5%

Wholesale

22.0

21.2

3.8%

21.1

20.2

18.2

4.5%

11.0%

Retail

34.3

32.2

6.5%

33.0

29.4

27.1

12.2%

8.5%

Gas (th.rub. /th. cubic meter)

2.79

2.97

(6.1)%

2.63

1.97

1.47

33.5%

34.0%

Sales of bunker fuel to end-users

18.0

18.5

(2.7)%

18.0

17.9

15.4

0.6%

16.2%

Petrochemical products

29.5

30.0

(1.7)%

29.9

29.8

27.0

0.3%

10.4%

International sales

36.4

36.4

0.0%

35.8

33.9

33.0

5.6%

2.7%

Domestic

14.1

11.4

23.7%

14.3

16.8

14.0

(14.9)%

20.0%

*average price is calculated from unrounded figures

 

International Crude Oil Sales to non-CIS

Revenues from international crude oil sales to non-CIS countries amounted in the fourth quarter of 2013 to RUB 608 billion compared to RUB 596 billion in the third quarter of 2013. Sales volumes upturn of 5.1% (positive impact on revenues of RUB 31 billion) was partially offset by average prices decrease of 2.0% (negative impact on revenues of RUB 19 billion). Increase in sales volumes was due to increased deliveries under long-term crude oil supply agreements.

In 2013 revenues from international crude oil sales to non-CIS countries increased by 48.9% compared to 2012 and amounted to RUB 695 billion. Sales volumes growth followed by Company's expansion was 47.0% (positive impact on revenues of RUB 652 billion) and was accompanied by a slight increase in sales volumes by 2.1% (favourable impact on revenues of RUB 43 billion).

In 2012 revenues from international crude oil sales to non-CIS countries increased by 7.6% compared to 2011. A 6.3% upturn in average prices (positive impact on revenues of RUB 87 billion) was accompanied by a slight increase in sales volumes by 1.0% (favourable impact on revenues of RUB 13 billion). 

The deviation between sales prices on the Asian markets and average world market prices (Dubai) in the fourth quarter of 2013 was due to deliveries to Transneft of 6.0 million tonnes (44.17 million barrels) of crude oil per year under the contract signed in 2009.

These volumes are sold to Transneft at export alternative price basis and are recognized as international sales in Company's sales structure. Share of sales to Transneft in the total volume of oil supplies to the Asian region decreased in the fourth quarter of 2013. Excluding revenues from crude oil sales to Transneft (RUB 20 billion) in the fourth quarter of 2013 the average sales price on the Asian markets in comparison with third quarter 2013 remains unchanged and amounts to RUB 3.6 thousand per barrel.

In 2013 the average price on the Asian markets amounted to RUB 3.5 thousand per barrel excluding revenues from crude oil sales to Transneft (RUB 78 billion).

International Crude Oil Sales to CIS

Revenue from sales of crude oil to CIS in the fourth quarter of 2013 increased by 13.9% compared to the third quarter 2013 and amounted to RUB 41 billion due to growth of sales volume by 12.0%.

In 2013 revenues from international crude oil sales to CIS countries were RUB 128 billion or 64.1% upturn in comparison with 2012, which is mainly attributable to sales volumes growth of 51.8% (positive impact on revenues of RUB 40 billion) and was accompanied by a 7.4% increase in average sales price (favourable impact on revenues of RUB 10 billion).

In 2012 revenues from international crude oil sales to CIS countries (Belarus and Kazakhstan) were RUB 24 billion higher in comparison with 2011, which is attributable to sales volumes growth of 41.4% (positive impact on revenues of RUB 22 billion). Average price upturn of 2.5% led to revenue growth of RUB 2 billion.

Domestic Sales of Crude Oil

Revenue from domestic sales of crude oil in the fourth quarter of 2013 decreased by 8.3% compared to the third quarter 2013 and amounted to RUB 22 billion. Decrease in sales volume on the domestic market by 4.5% (negative impact on revenues of RUB 1 billion), was accompanied by downturn of average crude oil price by 6.0% (unfavourable impact on revenues of RUB 1 billion).

In 2013 revenues from domestic sales of crude oil were RUB 81 billion. The increase in sales volume more than 12 times (the positive impact on revenues of RUB 65 billion) was accompanied by growth of average crude oil price by 15.5% (the positive impact of RUB 11 billion).

International Petroleum Product Sales to Non-CIS

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold to

non-CIS countries:

For 3 months ended

% change

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

High octane gasoline

4

0.2

28.9

6

0.2

30.4

(33.3)%

0.0%

(4.9)%

Low octane gasoline

1

0.1

34.1

0

0.0

35.5

(3.9)%

Naphtha

29

0.9

30.5

36

1.3

29.6

(19.4)%

(30.8)%

3.0%

Diesel (Gasoil)

89

3.0

30.0

89

2.9

30.4

0.0%

3.4%

(1.3)%

Fuel oil

109

5.3

19.8

119

6.2

19.6

(8.4)%

(14.5)%

1.0%

Jet fuel

0

0.0

37.1

1

0.0

37.3

(100.0)%

0.0%

(0.5)%

Other

22

0.8

28.4

14

0.5

25.7

57.1%

60.0%

10.5%

Total petroleum products exported to non-CIS

254

10.3

24.5

265

11.1

24.2

(4.2)%

(7.2)%

1.2%

Petroleum products sold from ROG refineries

65

2.3

28.9

68

2.2

30.0

(4.4)%

4.5%

(3.7)%

Petroleum products bought and sold outside Russia

3

0.1

30.9

3

0.1

31.1

0.0%

0.0%

(0.6)%

Total

322

12.7

25.3

336

13.4

25.1

(4.2)%

(5.2)%

0.8%

Revenue from the international sales of petroleum products to non-CIS countries were RUB 322 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, which is 4.2% lower compared to the third quarter of 2013 (negative effect of RUB 14 billion). The decrease resulted from sales volumes downturn of 5.2% (negative impact of RUB 18billion), that was partially offset by upturn of average prices by 0.8% (favourable impact of RUB 4 billion).

 

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold to non-CIS countries:

For 12 months ended December 31,

% change between12 months ended December 31,

2013 and 2012

% change between12 months ended December 31,

2012 and 2011

2013

2012

2011

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

High octane gasoline

17

0.6

29.2

7

0.2

37.2

14

0.6

25.4

>100.0%

>100.0%

(21.5)%

(50.0)%

(66.7)%

46.5%

Low octane gasoline

2

0.1

34.9

5

0.2

30.1

6

0.3

27.7

(60.0)%

(50.0)%

15.9%

(16.7)%

(33.3)%

8.7%

Naphtha

118

4.1

28.7

104

3.6

28.8

94

3.5

26.7

13.5%

13.9%

(0.3)%

10.6%

2.9%

7.9%

Diesel (Gasoil)

322

11.1

29.1

203

7.0

29.1

183

6.8

27.0

58.6%

58.6%

0.0%

10.9%

2.9%

7.8%

Fuel oil

397

20.7

19.2

254

12.6

19.9

241

13.1

18.4

56.3%

64.3%

(3.5)%

5.4%

(3.8)%

8.2%

Jet fuel

2

0.0

37.6

1

0.0

37.6

1

0.0

31.7

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

18.6%

Other

50

1.9

26.4

5

0.3

27.0

8

0.3

25.5

>100.0%

>100.0%

(2.2)%

(37.5)%

0.0%

5.9%

Total petroleum products exported to non-CIS

908

38.5

23.6

579

23.9

24.2

547

24.6

22.3

56.8%

61.1%

(2.5)%

5.9%

(2.8)%

8.5%

Petroleum products sold from ROG refineries

245

8.6

28.5

260

8.7

29.7

165

5.9

27.9

(5.8)%

(1.1)%

(4.0)%

57.6%

47.5%

6.5%

Petroleum product purchased and sold outside Russia

12

0.4

30.1

17

0.6

29.3

(29.4)%

(33.3)%

2.7%

Total

1,165

47.5

24.5

856

33.2

25.8

712

30.5

23.4

36.1%

43.1%

(5.0)%

20.2%

8.9%

10.3%

In 2013 revenues from the export of petroleum products to non-CIS countries were RUB 1,165 billion, 36.1% higher compared to 2012.  Sales volume increased by 43.1% (favourable impact on revenues of RUB 369 billion). Significant increase in sales volumes was partially offset by average price decline of 5.0% (negative impact on revenues of RUB 60 billion).

In 2012 revenues from the export of petroleum products to non-CIS countries were 20.2% higher compared to 2011. The increase in sales volumes was due to acquisition of a 50% share in Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG).

Domestic Sales of Petroleum Products

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold in Russia:

For 3 months ended

% change

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

High octane gasoline

96

2.8

33.2

97

3.1

31.9

(1.0)%

(9.7)%

4.1%

Low octane gasoline

1

0.1

28.4

1

0.0

22.7

0.0%

25.1%

Diesel

88

2.9

29.9

89

3.1

28.2

(1.1)%

(6.5)%

6.0%

Fuel oil

7

0.7

10.1

5

0.5

10.9

40.0%

40.0%

(7.3)%

Jet fuel

23

0.9

27.3

27

1.1

24.7

(14.8)%

(18.2)%

10.5%

Other

15

1.4

10.5

20

1.9

10.1

(25.0)%

(26.3)%

4.0%

Total

230

8.8

25.9

239

9.7

24.6

(3.8)%

(9.3)%

5.3%

Revenues from sales of petroleum products on the domestic market were RUB 230 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, 3.8% lower compared to the third quarter of 2013. The decrease in petroleum products sales resulted from declined volumes of crude oil processing at refineries in Russia due to planned turnarounds at the Company's refineries, including the Syzran, Saratov and Ryazan refineries.

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold in Russia:

For 12 months ended December 31,

% change between12 months ended December 31,

2013 and 2012

% change between12 months ended December 31,

2012 and 2011

2013

2012

2011

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

High octane gasoline

334

10.5

31.7

188

6.3

30.0

174

6.3

27.4

77.7%

66.7%

5.7%

8.0%

0.0%

9.5%

Low octane gasoline

4

0.2

24.0

7

0.4

24.7

7

0.3

22.5

(42.9)%

(50.0)%

(2.8)%

0.0%

33.3%

9.8%

Diesel

305

10.7

28.4

212

8.7

24.9

196

9.5

20.7

43.9%

23.0%

14.1%

8.2%

(8.4)%

20.3%

Fuel oil

19

1.9

10.2

17

1.6

10.6

19

2.1

9.2

11.8%

18.8%

(3.8)%

(10.5)%

(23.8)%

15.2%

Jet fuel

77

3.1

25.4

39

1.6

25.4

25

1.1

22.1

97.4%

93.8%

0.0%

56.0%

45.5%

14.9%

Other

55

5.4

10.1

34

2.8

10.9

27

2.1

12.7

61.8%

92.9%

(7.3)%

25.9%

33.3%

(14.2)%

Total

794

31.8

24.9

497

21.4

23.1

448

21.4

20.9

59.8%

48.6%

7.8%

10.9%

0.0%

10.5%

Revenues from sales of petroleum products on the domestic market in 2013 were 59.8% higher in comparison to 2012 and amounted to RUB 794 billion. The increase was due to sales volumes growth by 48.6% (favorable impact on revenues of RUB 240 billion) and 7.8% upturn in average prices (positive impact on revenues of RUB 57 billion).

The Company significantly extended its customer base of jet fuelling (high premium margin sales) due to participation of important partners that resulted in growth of the jet fuel sales more than twice in comparison with 2012.

Revenues from sales of petroleum products on the domestic market were RUB 497 billion in 2012 which is an increase of 10.9% compared with 2011. This resulted from a 10.5% upturn in average prices (positive impact on revenues of RUB 49 billion).

Sales of bunker fuel

The Company has been selling bunker fuel (fuel oil, low-viscosity marine fuel and diesel fuel) in the seaport (the far East, the North and South of the European part of Russia) and river ports (the Volga-don basin and in the rivers of Western Siberia) of the Russian Federation and in ports outside the Russian Federation.

Revenues from sales of bunker fuel in the fourth quarter of 2013 were RUB 16 billion, a decrease of 15.8% in comparison with the previous quarter, due to seasonal factor.

Revenues from sales of bunker fuel in 2013 increased by 18.0% or RUB 9 billion in comparison with 2012. 16.2% upturn in average pricesaccompanied by a 12.0% increase in sales volumes led to revenue growth of 35.1% or RUB 13 billion in 2012 compared to 2011.

The Company expands its bunker fuel business. Rosneft entered into long-term contracts with contractors in the Far East, arranged bunker fuel sales from "Rosneft Marine Transshipment Complex (Deepwater Berth)" and from the bunker fuel tankers in the Black Sea. Furthermore, the second bunker fuel tanker in the Black Sea was put into operation in 2013.

Petrochemical Product Sales

Revenues from sales of petrochemical products in the fourth quarter of 2013 were RUB 27 billion, or 22.7% increase, compared to the third quarter of 2013, which was due to the domestic sales price growth.

The sales volumes of petrochemical product from Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) in the fourth quarter 2013 in comparison to the third quarter 2013 increased by 6.0% and equaled to 0.6 mln tonnes.

In 2013, revenues from sales of petrochemical products increased by 11.9% compared to 2012, due to the growth of sales volume by 6.9% (positive impact on revenues of RUB 6 billion). In 2013 sales volumes of petrochemical product from Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) amounted to 2.2 mln tonnes.

In the year ended 31 December 2012, revenues from sales of petrochemical products increased by 40.0% compared to 2011, due to the acquisition of a portion of Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) in May 2011. The sales volumes of petrochemical product from Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) were 2.05 mln tones and 1.38 mln tones in 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Gas Sales

Rosneft's gas sales have been limited to date, but the Company's long term strategy envisages significant expansion of its gas business. Gazprom controls the Unified Gas Supply System (UGSS) and is the dominant gas supplier in Russia and the only exporter of gas.

The table below sets forth revenues, volumes and average price of gas sales by Rosneft*:

For 3 months ended

Changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

Change for

12 months endedDecember 31,

 

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -

2012

2012 -

2011

 

Revenue

(RUB billion)

%

(RUB billion)

%

 

Western Siberia

27.6

14.8

86.5%

55.4

5.7

4.1

871.9%

39.0%

 

South Russia

2.9

2.5

16.0%

9.7

8.0

6.8

21.3%

17.6%

 

Far East

0.4

0.2

100.0%

1.3

1.4

1.2

(7.1)%

16.7%

 

European part of Russia

9.3

12.4

(25.0)%

29.9

6.7

2.1

346.3%

219.0%

 

Outside Russian Federation

0.4

5.5

(92.7)%

6.6

0.0

0.0

 

Total

40.6

35.4

14.7%

102.9

21.8

14.2

>100.0%

53.5%

 

Sales volumes

(bcm)

(bcm)

%

Western Siberia

10.31

6.17

67.1%

24.02

4.54

5.09

429.1%

(10.8)%

 

South Russia

0.86

0.74

16.2%

3.11

3.02

2.91

3.0%

3.8%

 

Far East

0.16

0.10

60.0%

0.58

0.72

0.71

(19.4)%

1.4%

 

European part of Russia

3.08

4.33

(28.9)%

10.42

2.80

1.03

272.1%

171.8%

 

Outside Russian Federation

0.14

0.56

(75.0)%

0.94

0.00

0.00

 

Total

14.55

11.90

22.3%

39.07

11.08

9.74

>100.0%

13.8%

 

Average price

(th. RUB/th. of cubic metres)

(th. RUB/th. of cubic metres)

%

Western Siberia

2.63

2.23

17.9%

2.24

1.25

0.80

79.2%

56.3%

 

South Russia

3.33

3.40

(2.1)%

3.12

2.64

2.35

18.2%

12.3%

 

Far East

2.35

2.44

(3.7)%

2.29

1.88

1.62

21.8%

16.0%

 

European part of Russia

3.01

3.05

(1.3)%

2.91

2.45

2.09

18.8%

17.2%

 

Outside Russian Federation

2.60

9.72

(73.3)%

6.97

0.00

0.00

 

Total

2.79

2.97

(6.1)%

2.63

1.97

1.47

33.5%

34.0%

 

 *average price is calculated from unrounded figures

In the fourth quarter of 2013 revenues from gas amounted to RUB 41 billion. The increase in gas sales was mainly driven by incorporation of NGK "Itera" LLC results in the Company's activity. The share of NGK "Itera" LLC gas sales in the fourth quarter 2013 was equalled to 43.8% in the total Company's gas sales. Organic growth in sales volume was caused by the seasonal increase in demand due to the start of the autumn-winter heating period. One of the main factors which determined the price in the fourth quarter of 2013 was the remoteness of final consumers from the gas producing facilities. In October 2013 gas tariffs were revised and increased by 1.9%.

Price fluctuation in the fourth quarter of 2013 in comparison with the third quarter of 2013 was also due to the changes in sales structure, lower exports to Europe and increase in sales volumes in the Western Siberia. The increased share of sales to households in heating periods in the total sales volumes negatively impacted the average gas sales price.

Gas sales growth of RUB 81 billion in 2013 in comparison with 2012 was driven by the acquisition of TNK and NGK "Itera" LLC assets. The Company is aimed to expand its gas business taking into consideration the integration of NGK "Itera" LLC assets, the acquisition of Sibneftegas assets at the end of December 2013, the developmentcompany's prospective fields and the increase in associated petroleum gas utilization.

Revenue growth from gas sales of 53.5% in 2012 in comparison with 2011 was driven by an increase in average prices of 34.0% and an increase in sales volumes which had a positive impact on revenues of RUB 6 billion and RUB 2 billion, respectively.

Support Services and Other Revenues

Rosneft owns service companies which render drilling, construction, repair and other services mainly to the companies within the Group. Revenues from services rendered to third parties are reported in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

The following table sets forth Rosneft's other revenues for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

Changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

Change for 12 months endedDecember 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -

2012

2012 -

2011

%of total revenue

%of total revenue

%

%of total revenue

%of total revenue

%of total revenue

%

(RUB billion, except %)

Drilling services

0.9

4.9%

1.0

7.0%

(10.0)%

2.9

5.0%

2.2

5.3%

1.2

2.7%

31.8%

83.3%

Sales of materials

3.8

20.9%

3.1

21.7%

22.6%

13.0

22.3%

10.1

24.3%

10.1

22.6%

28.7%

0.0%

Repairs and maintenance services

1.4

7.7%

0.9

6.3%

55.6%

2.7

4.6%

3.3

7.9%

3.2

7.2%

(18.2)%

3.1%

Rent services

1.0

5.5%

1.1

7.7%

(9.1)%

3.6

6.2%

2.8

6.7%

2.5

5.6%

28.6%

12.0%

Construction services

0.4

2.2%

0.1

0.7%

300.0%

0.7

1.2%

2.2

5.3%

2.8

6.3%

(68.2)%

(21.4)%

Transport services

2.5

13.7%

1.6

11.2%

56.3%

8.5

14.6%

7.2

17.3%

8.1

18.1%

18.1%

(11.1)%

Electric power sales and transmission

2.5

13.7%

1.4

9.8%

78.6%

6.2

10.6%

4.6

11.1%

8.9

19.9%

34.8%

(48.3)%

Other revenues

5.7

31.4%

5.1

35.6%

11.8%

20.8

35.5%

9.2

22.1%

7.9

17.6%

126.1%

16.5%

Total

18.2

100.0%

14.3

100.0%

27.3%

58.4

100.0%

41.6

100.0%

44.7

100.0%

40.4%

(6.9)%

Support services and other revenues were 27.3% higher in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to the third quarter of 2013 and amounted to RUB 18.2 billion.

In 2013 support services and other revenues were 40.4 % higher than 2012 and amounted to RUB 58.4 billion.

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

The equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures decreased by RUB 3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared with the third quarter of 2013. The decrease in profits incurred by Rosneft's associates mainly resulted from re-estimation of financial results of Venezuela assets. Excluding this effects the equity share in profits of associates remains unchanged and amounted RUB 3 billion.

In 2013 the equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures decreased by RUB 11 billion and amounted to RUB 12 billion. The decrease in equity share in profits of associatesis mainly due to exemption of Verkhnechonskneftegaz equity results and incorporation of total Verkhnechonskneftegaz results into Company's consolidation from the date of acquisition.

In 2012 and 2011 the equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures amounted to RUB 23 billion and RUB 16billion, respectively.

Costs and Expenses

Production and Operating Expenses

Operating expenses are split over operating segments in the table below.

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

% change for 12 months

ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -

2012

2012 -

2011

(RUB billion, except %)

Upstream

61.7

57.5

7.3%

201.9

85.0

70.7

>100.0%

20.2%

Upstream ecological

reserves

1.7

1.7

0.7

-

>100.0%

-

Downstream

49.4

34.1

44.9%

153.7

130.0

89.8

18.2%

44.8%

Other

8.3

7.0

18.6%

31.7

30.8

28.7

2.9%

7.3%

Total

121.1

98.6

22.8%

389.0

246.5

189.2

57.8%

30.3%

Upstream production and operating expenses

Upstream production and operating expenses include materials and supplies, equipment maintenance and repairs, wages and salaries, activities to enhance oil recovery, procurement of fuel and lubricants, electricity and other costs of Rosneft's consolidated exploration and production units.

In the fourth quarter of 2013 the Company revised the estimates of ecological reserves. The result of revision was reflected in "Upstream ecological reserves" and amounted to RUB 1.7 billion year-to-date.

In 2010 the Company adopted a special five-year land restoration program aimed at restoration of lands located in the territory of upstream activities of several subsidiaries of Rosneft and damaged before the acquisition of these subsidiaries by Rosneft. In March 2012 the program was amended, which resulted in additional accrual of RUB 0.7 billion. This amount does not include expenses on land restoration spent by the Company as a part of regular production activity.

Upstream production and operating expenses increased by 7.3% in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared with the previous quarter and amounted to RUB 61.7 billion. The increase in operating expenses was due to geological and engineering expenses growth, increase in equipment maintenance and repairs and seasonal growth of electricity tariffs.

In 2013 upstream production and operating expenses increased by more than 100.0% compared with 2012. The growth of expenses was mainly due to incorporation of operating expenses of new production units and due to gas program implementation. Organic growth of lifting cost per bbl was 11.4*% in 2013 compared with 2012 due to increased electricity tariffs, increase in price of materials, fuel and lubricants and other factors.

In 2012 upstream production and operating expenses increased by 20.2% up to RUB 85.0 billion compared with 2011.

Upstream production and operating expenses per barrel of crude oil produced and per barrel of oil equivalent are presented in the table below.

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

% change for 12 months ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -

2012

2012 -

2011

(RUB per bbl and RUB per boe, except %)

Expenses per bbl of crude oil produced

169.8

159.3

6.6%

153.9

99.5

88.8

54.7%

12.0%

Expenses per boe

149.0

141.5

5.3%

136.6

90.8

81.6

50.4%

11.3%

Downstream production operating expenses

Rosneft's downstream operating expenses increased by 44.9% in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared with the third quarter of 2013. The increase was mainly due to realization of accumulated intragroup inventories (according to the accounting principles operating expenses are adjusted for all the expenses associated with the change in intragroup inventories).

*Estimated by pro-forma data

 

Downstream operating expenses increased by 18.2% in 2013 compared with 2012 mainly due to incorporation of operating expenses of new refining units, including Saratov refinery, Ryazan refinery and marketing units. This growth was significantly compensated by accumulation of intragroup inventories (according to the accounting principles operating expenses are adjusted for all the expenses associated with the change in intragroup inventories). 

Downstream operating expenses increased by 44.8% in 2012 compared with 2011. 

The table below shows operating expenses at Rosneft's refineries.

 

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

% change for 12 months

ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -

2012

2012 -

2011

Operating expenses at refineries in Russia

(RUB billion)

18.10

15.62

15.9%

57.46

35.14

27.71

63.5%

26.8%

Operating expenses per tonne of petroleum product and petrochemical output

(RUB per tonne)

968

778

24.4%

829

720

576

15.1%

25.0%

Operating expenses per tonne of crude oil throughput

(RUB per tonne)

932

755

23.4%

799

691

547

15.6%

26.3%

Operating expenses at refineries outside Russia

(RUB billion)*

4.08

3.14

29.9%

15.81

14.98

-

5.5%

-

Operating expenses per tonne of petroleum product and petrochemical output

(RUB per tonne)

1,463

1,140

28.3%

1,492

1,388

-

7.5%

-

Operating expenses per tonne of crude oil throughput

(RUB per tonne)

1,468

1,139

28.9%

1,492

1,396

-

6.9%

-

Total operating expenses at Rosneft's refineries

(RUB billion)

22.18

18.76

18.2%

73.27

50.12

27.71

46.2%

80.9%

*refineries outside Russia also procured for processing additives and materials: in the fourth quarter of 2013 - in the amount of RUB 7.30 billion, in the third quarter of 2013 - in the amount of RUB 7.44 billion., in the years 2013 and 2012 - in the amount of RUB 30.65 billion and RUB 33.70 billion, respectively. In the year of 2011 processing costs were reflected in 'Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining cost" of financial statements.

Operating expenses of Rosneft's refineries were RUB 22.18 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, which is an increase of 18.2% compared with the third quarter of 2013.  In 2013 operating expenses of Rosneft's refineries increased by 46.2% compared with RUB 73.27 billion in 2012.

Operating expenses of Rosneft's refineries in Russia were RUR 18.10 billion, representing an increase of 15.9% compared with the third quarter of 2013 that was mainly due to increase inelectricity tariffs, planned maintenance and repairs expenses.

In 2013 operating expenses of Rosneft's refineries in Russia increased to RUB 57.46 billion (or, by 63.5%) compared with RUB 35.14 billion in 2012 mainly due to incorporation of operating expenses of new refining units. Organic growth of the refining costs per tonne at Rosneft's refineries in Russia was 10.1%* compared with 2012. The growth resulted mainly from higher materials and supplies due to increased production of Euro-4 and Euro-5 standard petroleum products and other factors.

In 2012 these expenses increased by 26.8% to RUB to 35.14 billion compared with RUB 27.71 billion in 2011. The growth resulted mainly from increase in volumes of additives used to produce euro-standard productsin accordance with requirements of technical regulations for motor fuel quality. The growth was also due to higher prices for additives and other materials involved in production and increase in the electricity tariffs.

Higher operating expenses per tonne at Rosneft's refineries outside Russia is a result of larger spectrum of petroleum products output and especially petrochemical output as well as Nelson index (more complicated technological process).

**Estimated by pro-forma data

 

Other operating expenses

Operating expenses related to other activities increased by 18.6% in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared with the third quarter of 2013 due to the higher volumes of drilling services, energy transmission services and other services rendered to the third parties.

In 2013 other operating expenses increased by 2.9% up to RUB 31.7 billion compared with RUB 30.8 billion in 2012. The increase was primarily due to higher volumes of drilling services, sales of materials and other services rendered to the third parties.

In 2012 these expenses increased by 7.3% in 2011. The increase was primarily due to the higher volumes of drilling and other services rendered to the third parties.

Cost of Purchased Oil, Gas and Petroleum Products and Refining Costs

The following table shows Rosneft's crude oil, gas and petroleum products procurement costs and volumes and third-party refining costs:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

% change for 12 months

ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -

2012

2012 -

2011

Crude oil procurement

Cost of crude oil procured (RUB billion)

95

103

(7.8)%

341

261

225

30.7%

16.0%

including Domestic market

31

36

(13.9)%

108

40

72

>100%

(44.4)%

International market

64

67

(4.5)%

233

221

153

5.4%

44.4%

Volume of crude oil procured (million of barrels)

39.8

42.5

(6.4)%

143.3

91.4

104.1

56.8%

(12.2)%

including Domestic market

21.9

23.6

(7.2)%

77.0

28.3

59.1

>100%

(52.1)%

International market

17.9

18.9

(5.3)%

66.3

63.1

45.0

5.1%

40.2%

Inventory revaluation write-off (RUB billion)

-

14

-

14

-

-

100%

-

Gas procurement

Cost of gas procured (RUB billion)

12.3

9.3

32.3%

26.0

1.2

1.0

>100%

20.0%

Volume of gas procured (bcm)

7.57

5.37

 

40.1%

14.9

0.72

0.55

>100%

30.9%

Petroleum products procurement

Cost of petroleum product procured (RUB billion) 1

7

7

0.0%

35

57

61

(38.6)%

(6.6)%

Volume of petroleum product procured (million of tonnes)

0.32

0.26

23.1%

1.34

2.1

2.4

(36.2)%

(12.5)%

Crude oil, gas and petroleum products refining services

Cost of refining of crude oil under processing agreements (RUB billion)

5.1

4.9

4.0%

15.6

-

11

100%

-

Volumes of crude oil refined under processing agreements (million of tonnes)

0.6

0.8

(25.0)%

4.0

-

7.2

100%

-

Volumes of refining of gas under processing agreements (bcm)

0.7

0.8

(12.5)%

3.7

-

-

100%

-

Volumes of refining of petroleum products under processing agreements (million of tonnes)

2.3

1.9

21.1%

4.4

-

-

100%

-

Total cost of procured oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs (RUB billion)

120

138

(13.0)%

432

319

298

35.4%

7.0%

1 Average procurement price of petroleum products from third parties may be higher than the average selling price of petroleum products due to differences in the mix of procured and sold petroleum products.

 

Crude oil procurement

Rosneft purchases crude oil primarily from its affiliates to process it at own refineries and also to export. Rosneft procures crude oil on the international market to supply it to Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) refineries.

The structure of crude oil purchases is provided in the table below:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

% change for 12 months

ended 31 December,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -

2012

2012 -

2011

(million bbl, except %)

International market

17.9

18.9

(5.3)%

66.3

63.1

45.0

5.1%

40.2%

Udmurtneft

5.2

5.6

(7.1)%

19.7

12.6

9.1

56.3%

38.5%

Tomskneft

-

-

-

-

-

39.7

-

-

Slavneft

15.1

15.4

(1.9)%

48.0

-

Others

1.6

2.6

(38.5)%

9.3

15.7

10.3

(40.8)%

52.4%

Total

39.8

42.5

(6.4)%

143.3

91.4

104.1

56.8%

(12.2)%

 

Rosneft performed oil swap operations in order to optimize transportation costs of deliveries to refineries. Revenues and costs related to these operations were shown on a net basis in the "Pipeline tariffs and Transportation costs" line of the consolidated statement of comprehensive income in previous periods.

Starting from September 2013 the Company ceased completely oil swap operations, which resulted in a change in crude oil purchase structure. The volume of crude oil swaps amounted to 0.6 million barrels in the third quarter of 2013.

The volume of crude oil swaps amounted to 68.7 million barrels and 81.6 million barrels in 2013 and 2012, respectively. The gain from these transactions was approximately RUB 2.5 billion for 2013 and RUB 2.3 billion for 2012.

Petroleum products procurement

Petroleum products from third parties are procured primarily to cover current needs of Rosneft's retail subsidiaries. Procurement of petroleum products is exposed to seasonal fluctuations of volumes and mix. Procurement prices may significantly vary depending on regional markets.

Petroleum products outside Russia are purchased primarily for sale in Germany and Ukraine.

The table below sets forth Rosneft's costs, volumes and average prices per tonne of petroleum products procured from third parties:

For 3 months ended

% change

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price

th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

High octane gasoline

1

0.05

29.9

1

0.05

30.5

0

0.0%

2.0%

Diesel

1

0.05

26.8

1

0.03

26.4

0

66.7%

(1.5)%

Fuel oil

0

0.02

11.9

0

0.02

11.8

0

-

(0.8)%

Jet fuel

1

0.03

25.7

1

0.02

25.6

0

50.0%

(0.4)%

Other

0

0.00

0.0

0

0.00

0.0

-

-

-

Petroleum products procured outside Russia

4

0.17

29.7

4

0.14

30.3

-

21.4%

(2.0)%

Total

7

0.32

23.3

7

0.26

27.9

-

23.1%

(16.5)%

The volume of petroleum product procured in the fourth quarter of 2013 increased to 0.32 million of tonnes. The increase resulted from insufficient fulfillment of seasonal increased consumption of petroleum products from Company resources caused by turnarounds.

The table below sets forth Rosneft's costs, volumes and average prices per tonne of petroleum products procured from third parties in 2013, 2012 and 2011:

For 12 months ended December 31,

% change for 12 months

ended December 31,

 2013 and 2012

% change for 12 months ended December 31,

2012 and 2011

2013

2012

2011

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

High octane gasoline

6

0.24

28.2

24

0.90

26.7

50

1.85

26.6

(75.0)%

(73.3)%

7.9%

(52.0)%

(51.4)%

0.4%

Low octane gasoline

0

0.00

30.6

0

0.00

25.0

1

0.06

18.4

-

-

22.4%

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

35.9%

Diesel

4

0.17

27.0

10

0.41

25.1

8

0.42

20.5

(60.0)%

(58.5)%

7.6%

25.0%

(2.4)%

22.4%

Fuel oil

1

0.05

11.9

100.0%

100.0%

100%

-

-

-

Jet fuel

2

0.09

25.9

2

0.07

24.3

-

0.00

18.3

-

28.6%

6.6%

-

-

32.8%

Other

2

0.07

22.8

3

0.13

20.9

2

0.11

19.0

(33.3)%

(46.2)%

9.1%

50.0%

18.2%

10.0%

Petroleum products procured outside Russia

20

0.73

28.7

18

0.61

29.1

11.1%

19.7

(1.4)%

-

-

-

Total

35

1.34

26.4

57

2.12

25.5

61

2.44

24.9

(38.6)%

(36.2)%

3.5%

(6.5)%

(13.1)%

2.4%

The decrease in volumes of petroleum product purchased in 2013 compared to 2012 was due consumption fulfilment from Company's resources following the increase in processing volumes.

The decrease in volumes of petroleum product purchases in 2012 in comparison to 2011 was due to increased supplies for retail sales from own refineries.

Average petroleum product procurement prices may deviate from average sales prices depending on particular regions and product quality.

Petroleum products procurement outside Russia

Petroleum products procured outside Russia amounted to RUB 4billion (0.17 million tonnes) and RUB 4 billion (0.14 million tonnes) in the fourth quarter of 2013 and the third quarter of 2013, respectively. Additional petroleum products procurement mostly depends on demand fluctuations on the international market. Petroleum products purchased outside Russia in 2013 and 2012 were RUB 20 billion (0.73 mln tonnes) and RUB 18 billion (0.61 mln tonnes), respectively.

Gas procurement and crude oil and gas processing

Gas purchases amounted to RUB 12.3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, which was an increase of more than 32.3 % compared with RUB 9.3 billion in the third quarter of 2013. The increase was due to incorporation of NGK "Itera" LLC expenses in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Gas purchases in 2013, 2012 and 2011 were RUB 26.0 billion, RUB 1.2 billion and RUB 1.0 billion, respectively.

In the fourth quarter of 2013 the structure of processing services has changed. The share in volumes of crude oil and gas processing decreased due to sufficient fulfilment of own resources but share in volumes of petroleum products processing increased.

The crude oil processing services are rendered mostly by Yanos and Mozyr refineries. Gas processing is performed at LLC Yugragazpererabotka under processing agreement. Petroleum products processing services are rendered by Yanos refinery.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses include wages and salaries and social benefits (except for wages of technical staff of production and refining entities), banking commissions, third-party fees for professional services, insurance expenses (except for insurance of oil and gas production and refining entities), maintenance of social infrastructure, lease expenses, expenses to establish allowances for doubtful accounts and other general expenses.

The company strengthened control over administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses in the fourth quarter of 2013 were RUB 32 billion and in the third quarter of 2013 were RUB 33 billion.

In 2013 and 2012 general and administrative expenses were RUB 111 billion and RUB 68 billion, respectively. The increase was mainly driven by the incorporation of expenses of acquired assets, payment of commission fees under the long-term crude supply contracts, legal and consulting fees during the integration process with TNK and other services. In 2011 general and administrative expenses were RUB 52 billion.

Pipeline Tariffs and Transportation Costs

Transportation costs are costs incurred by Rosneft to transport crude oil for refining and to end customers, and to deliver petroleum products from refineries to end customers (these may include pipeline tariffs and any additional railroad transportation costs, handling costs, port fees, sea freight and other costs).

In the fourth quarter of 2013 Rosneft's transportation costs increased by 2.8% and amounted to RUB 111 billion compared to the third quarter of 2013. The growth mainly resulted from a change in structure of crude oil dispatches to refineries and a reduction of petroleum products exported under FCA terms where the Company doesn't bear any transportation expenses.

In 2013 Rosneft's transportation costs increased by 62.7% compared to 2012. The growth in transportation costs was due to incorporation of expenses of new assets, transportation volumes growth and tariffs indexation, partially offset by the change in structure of transportation routes.

In 2012 Rosneft's transportation costs increased by 11.6% compared to 2011. The increase resulted from transportation tariffs growth, which was partially offset by the change in structure of transportation routes.

The table below sets forth comparison on quarter-on-quarter basis for costs per tonne of crude oil and petroleum products transported by pipeline, railway and a combination of pipeline and railway:

For 3 months ended

% change

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

Volume, mln tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, bln RUB

Cost per tonne, th.RUB/t

Volume, mln tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, bln RUB

Cost per tonne, th.RUB/t

Volume

Cost

Cost per tonne

CRUDE OIL

International sales

Pipeline

25.3

92.7%

41.7

1.65

24.4

94.6%

40.7

1.66

3.7%

2.5%

(0.6)%

Railroad and mixed

2.0

7.3%

4.5

2.37

1.4

5.4%

3.3

2.31

42.9%

36.4%

2.6%

Transportation to refineries

Pipeline 1

22.6

17.2

0.76

24.2

18.6

0.77

(6.6)%

(7.5)%

(1.3)%

Railroad and mixed

1.6

6.9

4.24

1.4

5.5

4.02

14.3%

25.5%

5.5%

PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

International sales

Pipeline

1.0

6.8%

2.0

1.98

1.1

7.0%

2.1

1.95

(9.1)%

(4.8)%

1.5%

Railroad and mixed

11.8

79.7%

23.3

1.97

11.0

70.1%

20.4

1.88

7.3%

14.2%

4.8%

Pipeline and FCA2

2.0

13.5%

3.6

22.9%

(44.4)%

Other transportation expenses 3

15

17

(11.8)%

Total

66.3

111

67.1

108

(1.2)%

2.8%

1 Including crude oil purchased on international market, which was directed to Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG).

2 Rosneft exported part of petroleum products in the fourth quarter of 2013 and in the third quarter of 2013 through its own pipeline in the town of Tuapse, and on FCA terms from Samara refineries, where Rosneft does not bear transportation expenses directly, except for transshipment and dispatching cargo costs.

3 Other transportation expenses include cost of railroad transportation of petroleum products from refineries to tank farms and road transportation from tank farms to fuel filling stations. Other transportation expenses also include Rosneft expenses on crude oil swap deals excluding effect of price economy.

Crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of international sales remained practically unchanged in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to the third quarter of 2013.

The increase in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 2.6% due to increased export volumes and change in mix of transportation routes.

Crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries remained practically unchanged in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to the third quarter of 2013.

The increase in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries was 5.5% which was due to higher volumes transported to Komsomolsk refinery (long route) and lower volumes transported to Saratov Refinery (short route).

The increase in pipeline cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales was 1.5% mainly due to change in transportation structure.

Railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales increased by 4.8% in the fourth quarter of 2013 due to change in structure of transportation routes.

The table below sets forth comparison on year-to-year basis for costs per tonne of crude oil and petroleum products transported by pipeline, railway and a combination of pipeline and railway:

 

For 12 months ended December 31,

%

change between

the twelve months ended December 31,2013 and 2012

%

change between

the twelve months ended December 31,2012 and 2011

2013

2012

2011

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, bln. RUB

Cost per t, th.RUB/t

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, bln. RUB

Cost per t, th.RUB/t

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, bln. RUB

Cost per t, th.RUB/t

Volume

Cost

Cost per tonne

Volume

Cost

Cost per tonne

 

CRUDE OIL

 

International sales

 

Pipeline

91.9

94.5%

153.0

1.66

64.7

97.4%

105.6

1.63

61.5

96.3%

92.5

1.50

42.0%

44.9%

1.8%

5.2%

14.2%

8.7%

 

Railroad and mixed

5.4

5.5%

11.4

2.19

1.7

2.6%

1.4

0.84

2.4

3.7%

2.6

1.09

>100%

>100%

>100%

(29.2)%

(46.2)%

(22.9)%

 

Transportation to refineries

 

Pipeline 1

75.1

54.0

0.72

43.4

25.8

0.59

42.0

24.2

0.58

73.0%

>100%

22.0%

3.3%

6.6%

1.7%

 

Railroad and mixed

6.1

23.5

3.83

6.1

24.2

3.97

6.2

23.7

3.84

-

(2.9)%

(3.5)%

(1.6)%

2.1%

3.4%

 

PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

 

International sales

 

Pipeline

3.9

7.1%

8.1

2.10

1.4

3.8%

3.3

2.39

0.6

1.9%

1.4

2.22

>100%

>100%

(12.1)%

>100%

>100%

7.7%

 

Railroad and mixed

40.4

73.5%

76.0

1.88

27.0

73.4%

47.0

1.74

25.5

77.2%

49.7

1.95

49.6%

61.7%

8.0%

5.9%

(5.4)%

(10.8)%

 

Pipeline and FCA2

10.7

19.5%

8.4

22.8%

6.9

20.9%

27.4%

21.7%

 

Other transportation expenses 3

65

34

22

91.2%

54.5%

 

 

Total

233.5

392

152.7

241

145.1

216

52.9%

62.7%

5.2%

11.6%

 

1 Including crude oil purchased on international market, which was directed to Ruhr Oel GmbH.

2 Rosneft exported part of petroleum products in 2013, 2012 and 2011 through its own Tuapse pipeline and on FCA terms from Samara refineries, where Rosneft does not bear transportation expenses directly, except for transshipment and dispatching cargo costs.

3 Other transportation expenses include cost of railroad transportation of petroleum products from refineries to tank farms and road transportation from tank farms to fuel filling stations. Other transportation expenses also include Rosneft expenses on crude oil swap deals excluding economy in price.

In 2013 the increase in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 1.8% due to tariffs indexation and change in structure of transportation routes.

In 2012 the increase in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 8.7% in 2012 due to an increase in tariffs by 2.7% - 14.8%.

In 2013 the growth in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of international sales increased significantly which resulted from an increase in sales volumes and change in structure of railroad routes.

In 2012, the decrease in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 22.9% in 2012 due to the cease of Purneftegaz crude oil supply to CPC.

In 2013 crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries increased by 22.0% as a result of tariffs growth and change in structure of transportation routes.

In 2012 crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries increased by 1.7% as a result of tariffs growth that was partially offset by increased supplies to Ruhr Oel Gmbh (ROG) of crude oil procured on the international market.

In 2013 the decrease in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries was 3.5%, due to increased logistic efficiency.

In 2012 the increase in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries was 3.4% due to an increase in tariffs.

In 2013 the decrease in pipeline cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales was 12.1% due to logistic efficiency.

In 2012 the increase in pipeline cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales was 7.7% due to increase in tariffs.

In 2013 the increase in railroad and mixed cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales was 8.0% due to change in structure of transportation routes.

The decrease in railroad and mixed cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales was 10.8% in 2012 due to petroleum products sales volumes growth on the local market of Germany, where transportation costs are low due to short transportation distances.

Exploration Expenses

Exploration expenses mainly relate to exploratory drilling,seismic and other geological and geophysical works. Exploratory drilling costs are generally capitalised if commercial reserves of crude oil and gas are discovered or expensed in the current period in the event of unsuccessful exploration results.

In the fourth quarter of 2013 exploration expenses amounts to RUB 6 billion in comparison with RUB 5 billion in the third quarter of 2013 due to increased volumes of exploration drillings.

In 2013 exploration expenses decreased by 26.1% compared with 2012 due to decreased volumes of seismic works and other geological works not related to the exploration drilling on different license areas of the Company.

In 2012 exploration expenses were RUB 23 billion and increased by 76.9% compared with 2011 due to increased volumes of seismic exploration works at the blocks in the Black sea and Arctic off-shore.

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortisation

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation include depreciation of crude oil and gas producing assets, and other production and corporate assets.

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation were RUB 123 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to RUB 120 billion in the third quarter of 2013, including effect of re-estimation of TNK fixed assets under purchase price allocation of RUB 11 billion. Excluding this effect, the increase of RUB 14 billion was due to increased production volumes and increased book value of fixed assets.

In 2013 depreciation, depletion and amortisation increased by 90.3% compared with RUB 206 billion in 2012, mainly due to incorporation of acquired assets into the Company.

Taxes Other than Income Tax

Taxes other than income tax include the mineral extraction tax, the excise tax, the property tax and other taxes. The basis for calculation of mineral extraction tax is described under "-Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Results of Operations-Taxation-Mineral Extraction Tax" above.

The following table sets forth Rosneft's taxes other than income tax (excluding export duties) for the periods analysed:

 

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

%

change for 12 months

ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -2012

 2012-2011

(RUB billion, except %)

Mineral extraction tax

233

235

(0.9)%

829

553

414

49.9%

33.6%

Excise tax

38

41

(7.3)%

136

79

55

72.2%

43.6%

Social security tax

7

8

(12.5)%

31

23

15

34.8%

53.3%

Property tax

6

6

-

22

12

11

83.3%

9.1%

Interest, penalties and other payments to budget

2

1

100.0%

6

5

3

20.0%

66.7%

Total taxes other than income tax

286

291

(1.7)%

1 024

672

498

52.4%

34.9%

 

Taxes other than income tax were RUB 286 billion and decreased by 1.7% in the fourth quarter of 2013, compared with RUB 291 billion in the third quarter of 2013. The changes is mainly explained by decrease in excise duties due to decrease in exports of petroleum products subject to excise duties.

In 2013 taxes other than income was RUB 1 024 billion, an increase of 52.4% (RUB 352 billion) compared to RUB 672 billion in 2012. The increase is mainly due to incorporation of other tax expenses of new acquired assets in 2013and due to an increase in mineral extraction tax rate and excise duties.

In 2012 taxes other than income tax increased by 34.9% compared with 2011 mainly due to the beginning of the mineral extraction tax accruals for crude oil produced at the Vankor field and the increase in base rate of the mineral extraction tax and the excise tax rate indexation during 2012.

The following table sets the actual mineral extraction tax rates per tonne of crude oil and per tonne of oil equivalent produced for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

%

change for 12 months

ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -2012

 2012-2011

(thousand RUB per ton, except %)

Average enacted mineral extraction tax rate

5.47

5.63

(2.8)%

5.33

5.07

4.46

5.2%

13.7%

Actual mineral extraction tax expense per tonne of crude oil produced

4.78

4.84

(1.2)%

4.70

4.73

3.81

(0.6)%

24.1%

Actual mineral extraction tax expense per tonne of oil equivalent produced

4.19

4.29

(2.3)%

4.17

4.33

3.50

(3.7)%

23.7%

The actual mineral extraction tax rate is lower than generally established tax rate for the analysed period primarily due to the reduced rates for crude oil produced at fields with reserve depletion of over 80% and due to application of zero mineral extraction tax rate in the Irkutsk and the Krasnoyarskregions until its accumulated production exceeds 25 million tonnes. The difference between enacted rate and actual rate is also affected by the normal delay in the inventory turnover.

In 2011 the actual average mineral extraction tax rate and expense duty on application of the zero rate for crude oil produced at the Vankor fields was applicable till August 2011. Since May 2012, the reduced mineral extraction tax is applicable to the Severo-Vankorsky license area of Vankor field. The zero mineral extraction tax is also applied to Verkhnechonsk field until its accumulated production exceeds 25 million tonnes. 

Export Customs Duty

Export customs duties include crude oil and petroleum product export customs duties. The export customs duties are also discussed above under "Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Results of Operations-Taxation-Mineral Extraction Tax and Export Customs Duty".

The following table sets forth Rosneft's export customs duties for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -2012

 2012-2011

(RUB billion, except %)

Export customs duty for crude oil

300

273

9.9%

1,025

689

612

48.8%

12.6%

Export customs duty for gas

-

1

-

1

-

-

-

Export customs duty for petroleum products

101

105

(3.8)%

356

212

178

67.9%

19.1%

Total export customs duties

401

379

5.8%

1,382

901

790

53.4%

14.1%

Export custom duty growth of 5.8% in the fourth quarter of 2013 was due to increased export volume, negative export duty lag effect and was partially compensated by a decrease in customs duty rates.

 In 2013 export custom duty growth was 53.4% compared to 2012, mainly due to the expansion of Company's export operations resulted from consolidation of new acquired assets.

The following table sets forth certain information about the export customs duty:

For 3 months ended

 

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

 

For 12 months

ended December 31,

% change for 12 months

ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -2012

 2012-2011

(thousand RUB, except %)

Average Urals price

25.78

26.25

(1.8)%

25.67

25.08

23.45

2.4%

7.0%

Average enacted export customs duty

12.99

12.56

3.4%

12.49

12.57

12.02

(0.6)%

4.6%

Hypothetical export customs duty*

12.81

13.12

(2.4)%

12.50

12.55

12.61

(0.4)%

(0.5)%

Average customs duty on crude oil exports to non-CIS countries subject to regular rate (th. RUB/tonne)

13.01

12.52

3.9%

12.49

12.57

12.04

(0.6)%

4.4%

*Hypothetical customs duty is calculated using the average Urals price for the period (i.e. without time lag).

The actual average customs duty on exports subject to regular duty deviates from the enacted export customs duty due to different monthly export volumes.

Operating Income

As a result of the factors discussed above, operating income decreased by 18.0% to RUB 150 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared with RUB 183 billion in the third quarter of 2013. Operating income reduction was primarily due to decreased sales prices of crude oil, decreased sales volumes of petroleum products on domestic and international markets, accompanied by negative export duty lag effect and increased production expenses. As a percentage of total revenue operating income was 11.1% in the fourth quarter of 2013, 13.5% in the third quarter of 2013.

Operating income increased by 34.7% in 2013 compared to RUB 412 billion in 2012. Increase in operating income is primarily driven by increased sales volumes of petroleum product and gas, following the expansion of Company's activity. As a percentage of total revenue operating income was 11.8% in 2013 and 13.3% in 2012.

Finance Income and Expenses

Finance income and expenses include interest received on deposits, deposit certificates and loans issued, interest paid on loans and borrowings received, results from changes in fair value of financial assets measured at fair value, results from operations with derivative financial instruments, increase in provision due to the unwinding of discount, results from disposal of financial assets and other finance income and expenses.

Net finance expenses increased by RUB 5 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to the third quarter of 2013. The increase in net finance expenses is mainly attributable to changes in quarterly net effect from operations with derivative financial instruments, particularly cross-currency rate swap and forward contracts: the net gain from the operations recorded is RUB 0 billion and RUB 5 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 and in the third quarter of 2013, respectively.

In 2013 net finance expenses amounted to RUB 35 billion. In 2012 net finance income amounted to RUB 9 billion, respectively. In 2013 the increase in net finance expenses is mainly attributable to accrual of finance expenses on loans drawn for the acquisition of TNK assets, the repayment of bank deposits, and changes in net effect from operations with derivative financial instruments, particularly cross-currency rate swap, forward and collar contracts.

Net finance income in 2012 amounted to RUB 9 billion compared to RUB 1 billion in 2011. The increase is mainly attributable to changes in net effect from operations with derivative financial instruments and the extinguishment of restructured tax liabilities in 2011 and 2012.

Other income and other expenses

In the fourth quarter of 2013 other income amounted to RUB 35 billion compared to RUB 158 billion, including effect of RUB 167 billion of revaluation of TNK assets.

In 2013, 2012 and 2011 other income amounted to RUB 242 billion (including effect of RUB 167 billion fair price of TNK assets estimation), RUB 87 billion and RUB 25 billion, respectively.

In the fourth quarter of 2013 other expenses amounted to RUB 13 billion compared to RUB 26 billion in the third quarter of 2013. The decrease in other expenses is mainly due to strengthened control over expenses, the decrease in expenses on disposal of fixed assets and results of stocktaking.

In 2013, 2012 and 2011 other expenses amounted to RUB 59 billion, RUB 50 billion and RUB 48 billion, respectively.

Foreign Exchange Gain / (Loss)

Foreign exchange effect is mostly attributed to monthly revaluation of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency at the exchange rate at the end of the period.

Foreign exchange loss was RUB 14 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared with foreign exchange gain of RUB 9 billion in the third quarter of 2013. This change was attributed to revaluation of obligations denominated in foreign currency as a result of the significant weakening of the RUB against the US$ in November 2013.

Foreign exchange loss in 2013 was RUB 71 billion compared to foreign exchange gain of RUB 11 billion in 2012. The increase in foreign exchange loss was attributed to losses recognition from the revaluation of obligations denominated in foreign currency due RUB depreciation against USD in 2013.

Income Tax

The following table sets forth the Company's effective income tax rate under IFRS for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31,

December 31,

2013

September 30,

2013

2013

2012

2011

Effective income tax rate for Rosneft under IFRS

20.5%

24.5%

22.5%*

22.2%

21.2%

 

*Excluding the effect of RUB 167 billion fair price of TNK assets estimation and effect of RUB 38 billion of fair value estimation of non controlling interests in Verkhnechonskneftegaz.

The Company applies the provision of IAS 12 "Income taxes" to determine effective tax rate. The effective tax rate is calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to income before tax. The effective tax rate in the fourth quarter of 2013 was 20.5%.

The income tax expense amounted to RUB 15 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to 40 RUB billion in the third quarter of 2013. In the fourth quarter of 2013 the income tax expense includes the adjustment of deferred tax estimation - income of RUB 17 billion for 2013. Income tax expense amounted to RUB 81 billion and RUB 104 billion in 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Net Income/(Loss)

As a result of the factors discussed above, net income amounted to RUB 134 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to the net income of RUB 113 billion in the third quarter of 2013 (excluding the effect of RUB 167 billion referring to the revaluation of TNK assets). Foreign exchange loss had a significant negative impact on the net income quarterly results.

Net income amounted to RUB 551 billion and RUB 365 billion in 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in the net income is mainly attributable to operating income and other income increase (including the effect of new assets acquired) which were partially offset by foreign exchange losses. In 2011 net profit was RUB 335 billion.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

The principal items of the statement of cash flows for the periods analysed are as follows:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

Change for 12 months

ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -2012

 2012-2011

(RUB billion)

times

(RUB billion)

times

Net cash provided by operating activities

377

263

1.43

1,213

521

487

2.33

1.07

Net cash used in investing activities

(362)

 

(282)

1.28

(2,220)

(452)

(394)

4.91

1.15

Net cash from/(used in) financing activities

11

(80)

968

73

(56)

13.26

Operating Cash Flow

Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to RUB 377 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to RUB 263 billion in the third quarter of 2012. Operating cash flow includes operations with trading securities as part of the Company's efforts to manage cash resources (net outflow of RUB 17 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 and net outflow of RUB 0 billion in the third quarter of 2013).

Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to RUB 1,213 billion in 2013 compared to RUB 521 billion in 2012. Operating cash flow includes operations with trading securities as part of the Company's efforts to manage cash resources (net outflow of RUB 18 billion in 2013 and net inflow of RUB 5 billion in 2012).

For the management analysis the operating cash flow was adjusted for the effects mentioned above. The adjusted net cash provided by operating activity amounted to RUB 394 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 and RUB 263 billion in the third quarter of 2013. The adjusted net cash provided by operating activity amounted to RUB 1,231 billion in 2013 and RUB 516 billion in 2012.

Net cash provided by operating activity through the presented periods is given in the table below:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

Change for 12 months

ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -2012

 2012-2011

(RUB billion)

times

(RUB billion)

times

Net cash provided by operating activity

377

263

1.43

1,213

521

487

2.33

1.07

Effect from operation with trading securities

17

-

18

(5)

3

Adjusted net cash provided by operating activity

394

263

1.50

1,231

516

490

2.39

1.05

One off effect from receipts under long term oil contracts

163

49

3.33

470

Adjusted net cash provided by operating activity before change in working capital

231

214

1.08

761

516

490

1.47

1.05

The increase in the operating cash flowquarter-on-quarter primarily resulted from the significant change in working capital due to the following factors:

· increase in prepayments under long-term crude oil supply agreements and current prepayments for crude oil and petroleum products supply in January 2014;

· increase in account payables of RUB 33 billion

which was compensated by:

· increase in customs duty ant transportation prepayments of RUB 46 billion for the first weeks of 2014. These prepayments are regularly made at the end of the year.

In 2013 net cash provided by the operating activity (adjusted for the result of the operations with trading securities of RUB 18 billion) amounted to RUB 1,231 billion in comparison with RUB 516 billion (adjusted for the result of the operations with trading securities of RUB 5 billion) in 2012.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was RUB 362 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, compared to RUB 282 billion in the third quarter of 2013. The increase in cash used in investing activities was due to acquisition of interests in associate companies and increase in capital expenditures in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to the third quarter of 2013.

Net cash used in investing activities was RUB 2,220 billion and RUB 452 billion in 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in net cash used is mainly due to the acquisition of new assets in 2013. In 2011 Net cash used in investing activities was RUB 394 billion.

Capital Expenditures

The table below sets forth Rosneft's capital expenditures and license acquisition costs:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31,

% change for 12 months

ended December 31,

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2013

2012

2011

2013 -2012

 2012-2011

(RUB billion, except %)

LLC "RN-Yuganskneftegaz"

27

22

22.7%

100

108

96

(7.4)%

12.5%

JSC "Vankorneft"

15

13

15.4%

67

95

86

(29.5)%

10.5%

LLC "RN- Uvatneftegaz"

− *

10

(100.0)%

18*

JSC "Orenburgneft"

10

7

42.9%

25

JSC "Samotlorneftegaz"

4

3

33.3%

11

LLC "RN-Purneftegaz"

5

4

25.0%

18

18

15

20.0%

JSC "Samaraneftegaz"

2

3

(33.3)%

11

11

9

22.2%

JSC "Verkhnechonskneftegaz"

6

6

16

JSC "Tomskneft" VNK

2

1

100.0%

7

7

JSC "Rospan International"

3

2

50.0%

7

LLC "RN-Severnaya Neft"

2

1

100.0%

5

6

6

(16.7)%

JSC "RN- Nyaganneftegaz"

3

2

50.0%

6

LLC "JV "Vanyoganneft"

1

1

3

Other

18

10

80.0%

49

31

28

58.1%

10.7%

Total upstream segment

98*

85

15.3%

343*

276

240

24.3%

15.0%

JSC "NK "Rosneft"

1

1

1

1

Tuapse refinery

32

12

166.7%

69

76

59

(9.2)%

28.8%

Novokuibyshevsk refinery

8

4

100.0%

21

13

7

61.5%

85.7%

Kuibyshev refinery

5

4

25.0%

16

11

6

45.5%

83.3%

Angarsk refinery

3

4

(25.0)%

13

9

6

44.4%

50.0%

Achinsk refinery

6

3

100.0%

15

14

5

7.1%

180.0%

Syzran refinery

4

2

100.0%

13

8

5

62.5%

60.0%

Ryazan refinery

3

3

9

-

-

-

Saratov refinery

2

3

-

-

-

Komsomolsk refinery

6

(100.0)%

9

9

5

80.0%

Marketing Business Units and others1

14

7

100.0%

34

29

24

17.2%

20.8%

Total downstream segment

78

45

73.3%

203

170

118

19.4%

44.1%

Other activities 2

12

1

>100.0%

23

19

17

21.1%

11.8%

Subtotal capital expenditures

188*

131

43.5%

569*

465

375

22.4%

24.0%

Increase/(decrease) in stock of materials for capital expenditures

(6)

(1)

>100.0%

(9)

8

16

(212.5)%

(50.0)%

Total capital expenditures

182*

130

40.0%

560*

473

391

18.4%

21.0%

License acquisition costs

4

3

33.3%

12

4

7

200.0%

(42.9)%

1 Relating to companies providing processing and storage services. 

2 Relating to other services companies.

* Including government grants in the amount of RUB 7 billion, which reduced capital expenditures.

In the fourth quarter of 2013 total capital expenditures (including construction material purchases), increased by 40.0% to RUB 182 billion compared with RUB 130 billion in the third quarter of 2013. Increase in capital expenditure in the fourth quarter of 2013 is mainly attributable to planned capital expenditures at the end of the year.

In 2013, 2012 and 2011 total capital expenditures (including construction material purchases) amounted to RUB 560 billion, RUB 473 billion and RUB 391 billion, respectively. The increase is due to incorporation of capital expenditures of new acquired entities.

Upstream capital expenditures increased by 15.3% to RUB 98 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, compared with RUB 85 billion in the third quarter of 2012.

 In 2013, 2012 and 2011 upstream capital expenditures amounted to RUB 343 billion, RUB 276 billion and RUB 240 billion, respectively. In 2013 construction works mainly include development of oil field infrastructure and construction of associated gas utilization facilities. The increase is due to incorporation of capital expenditures of newly acquired entities.

Downstream capital expenditures increased by 73.3% to RUB 78 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, compared with RUB 45 billion in the third quarter of 2013.

In 2013, 2012 and 2011 downstream capital expenditures amounted to RUB 203 billion, RUB 170 billion and RUB 118 billion, respectively. In 2013 construction works mainly relate to continued programme for capacity upgrade and expansion at Rosneft's refineries, including modernisation of the Tuapse, Novokuibyshevsk, Syzran, Kuibyshev, Achinsk, Komsomolsk, Angarsk, Ryazan refineries.

In 2013 as part of the refinery modernization program in order to increase the refining depth and throughput and completely switch to production of the Euro-5 motor fuels the Company delivered large-scale equipment to Kuibyshev, Novokuibyshevsk, Syzran, Achinsk, Komsomolsk and Angarsk refineries and began installation works.

Capital expenditures for other activities increased to RUB 12 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, compared with RUB 1 billion in the third quarter of 2013.

In 2013, 2012 and 2011 capital expenditures for other activities amounted to RUB 23 billion, RUB 19 billion and RUB 17 billion, respectively. In 2013 capital expenditures for other activities related to planned acquisition of transportation and other equipment.

Since the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company's subsidiaries have been purchasing construction materials and selling the materials to contractors that provide construction and drilling services at subsidiaries' fields. The net decrease in stock of materials for capital expenditures was RUB 6 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, compared with RUB 1 billion in the third quarter of 2013. In 2013 the net decrease in stock of materials for capital expenditures was RUB 9 billion. In 2012 and 2011, the net increase in stock of materials for capital expenditures was RUB 8 billion and RUB 16 billion, respectively.

The license acquisition costs in the first quarter of 2013 refers to the acquisition of 12 licenses for research, exploration and production given by Government order at blocks located in the Barents Sea (Severo-Pomorsky-1, Yuzhno-Prinovozemelsky, Zapadno-Prinovozemelsky, Zapadno-Matveevsky, Russky), the Kara Sea (Severo-Karsky), the Chukotka Sea (Yuzhno-Chukotsky, Severo-Vrangelevsky-1, Severo-Vrangelevsky-2) and the Laptev Sea (Ust-Lensky, Ust-Oleneksky, Anisinsko-Novosibirsk).

In the second quarter of 2013 the Company acquired licenses for research, exploration and production at Albanovsky and Varneksky blocks located in the Barents Sea for RUB 1.4 billion, at Gudautsky block located in the Black Sea and at Yuzhno- Suvorovsky block located in the Chechen Republic. The Company paid for the acquired licenses in July 2013.

In the third quarter of 2013 the Company paid for the licenses at Albanovsky and Varneksky blocks located in the Barents Sea. The Company also acquired licenses for research, exploration and production at Lebedinsky and Mityaevsky blocks in Samara region and at blocks located in the Okhotsk Sea.

In the fourth quarter of 2013 the Company acquired licenses for research, exploration and production in the Nenets and Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Areas, Udmurtya, Samara region and Okhotsk Sea.

In 2012 and 2011 the license acquisition costs refer to the acquisition of licenses for research, exploration and production:

· In the Barents sea, in the Pechora sea, at blocks in the Ingooshetia and Samara regions in 2012;

· At blocks in the Nenets Autonomous Area, Krasnoyarsk region, Samara region and in the Okhotsk sea in 2011.

Financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was RUB 11 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to RUB 80 billion of net cash used in financing activities in the third quarter of 2013. The significant change in financing activities was mainly due to dividends paid in the third quarter in amount of RUB 85 billion.

Net cash provided by financing activities amounted to RUB 968 billion in 2013 compared to RUB 73 billion in 2012.Significant increase in cash provided by financing activity mainly resulted from long term loans drawn down from banks in the first quarter of 2013.

On June 20, 2013 the annual general shareholders' meeting approved dividends for 2012 in the amount of RUB 8.05 per share, exceeding by 6.9% the dividend per share for 2011. Total amount of recommended dividends for 2012 was RUB 85,315 million.

Net cash used in financing activities amounted to RUB 56 billion in 2011.

Debt Obligations

Rosneft net debt mounts to RUB 1,860 billion as of December 31, 2013 compared to RUB 1,909 billion as of September 30, 2013. The decrease is mainly attributable to planned repayments of loans drawn down for the acquisition of TNK assets.

Rosneft's total loans and borrowings was RUB 2,360 billion as of December 31, 2013 compared to RUB 2,373 billion as of September 30, 2013. The decrease was mainly attributable to planned loans repayment. In 2013 the Company made repayments of loans drawn down for acquisition of TNK assets in the amount of RUB 166.9 billion.

Additionally, net debt was adjusted for the amount of other short-term liabilities of RUB 7 billion and RUB 6 billion as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013, respectively. The liabilities resulted from the incorporation of TNK assets, and were primarily disclosed in other short term liabilities.

Portion of Rosneft's long-term loans are secured by oil export contracts. As of December 31, 2013, September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and: 23.6%, 23.2% and 48.4%, respectively, of Rosneft's borrowings were secured by crude oil export contracts (excluding exports to the CIS).

As of December 31, 2013, September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2013 pledged oil exports constituted 4.2%, 5.2%, and 13.6%, respectively, of the total crude oil export sales for the analysed period (excluding export to the CIS).

The саlculation of the net debt is disclosed in the following table:

As of the date

December 31, 2013

September 30, 2013

December 31,

2013

RUB billion

Short term debt

684

522

143

Other short term liabilities

7

6

-

Long term debt

1,676

1,851

837

Total debt

2,367

2,379

980

Cash and cash equivalents

275

246

299

Short-term Financial assets

232

224

90

Net debt

1,860

1,909

591

 

Key Financial Ratios

Rosneft monitors and evaluates its activities on an ongoing basis. Key financial ratios for the periods indicated are set forth below:

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31,

December31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

EBITDA* margin

20.4%

23.5%

20.7%

20.0%

24.4%

Net income margin

9.9%

20.6%

11.7%

11.8%

12.3%

Net debt to annualised EBITDA

1.791

1.89

1.791

0.96

0.66

Current ratio

1.05

1.32

1.05

2.09

1.89

RUB / bbl

EBITDA*/bbl

756

881

739

724

832

Upstream capital expenditure/bbl

270

235

261

323

302

Upstream operating expenses/bbl

170

159

154

100

89

Free cash flow before interest/bbl

135

233

153

50

124

RUB / boe

EBITDA*/boe

664

782

656

661

764

Upstream capital expenditure/boe

237

209

232

295

277

Upstream operating expenses/boe

149

142

137

91

82

Free cash flow before interest/boe

118

207

136

46

114

*Calculated from adjusted data

1Estimation, including Itera results from 01.01.2013

The Company considers EBITDA/bbl. upstream operating expenses/bbl. upstream operating expenses/boe and the related indicators as important measures of its operating performance. In addition, these measures are frequently used by financial analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of oil and gas companies. These measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of the Company's operating results as reported under IFRS.

All the 'per unit of production' indicators are calculated by dividing the total amount in RUB by the total production volume in bbl or boe (in mln bbl or mln boe) and are not adjusted for the effect of changes in inventories.

The following tables set forth relevant numbers relating to these measures for and as of the periods indicated:

Upstream Measures

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31,

December31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

Upstream capital expenditures (RUB billion)

98

85

343

276

240

Upstream operating expenses (RUB billion)

61.7

57.5

201.9

85.0

70.7

Barrels of crude oil produced (million)

363.6

361.0

1,312.1

853.9

795.8

Barrels of oil equivalent produced (million)

414.3*

406.5*

1,478.1*

934.5

866.4

*Excluding Itera gas production

Calculation of Adjusted Free Cash Flow

 

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31,

December31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

(RUB billion)

Net cash provided by operating activities

377

263

1,213

521

487

Capital expenditures

(182)

(130)

(560)

(473)

(391)

Trading securities operations

17

18

(5)

3

One-off effect from receipts under long term

oil contracts

(163)

(49)

(470)

Adjusted free cash flow

49

84

201

43

99

 

Calculation of adjusted EBITDA Margin

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31,

December31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

(RUB billion, except %)

Operating income

150

183

555

412

469

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation

123

120

392

206

193

EBITDA

273

303

947

618

662

One off effect

22

15

231

-

-

Adjucted EBITDA

275

318

970

618

662

Sales revenues

1,350

1,356

4 694

3,089

2,718

Adjusted EBITDA margin

20.4%

23.5%

20.7%

20.0%

24.4%

1One-off effect relates to commissions under loan term crude oil supply agreements and consulting services incurred during integration process in the amount of RUB 7 billion, the effect of inventory evaluation of RUB 14 billion under TNK purchase price allocation in the third quarter of 2013 and effect of re-estimation of land restoration liabilities.

2 One off effect from re-estimation of land restoration liabilities.

Calculation of Net Income Margin

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31,

December31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

(RUB billion, except %)

Net income

134

280

551

365

335

Revenues

1,350

1,356

4,694

3,089

2,718

Net income margin

9.9%

20.6%

11.7%

11.8%

12.3%

Current ratio

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December31, 2013

September 30, 2013

2013

2012

2011

(RUB billion, except %)

Current assets

1,455

1,402

1,455

949

838

Current liabilities

1,387

1,059

1,387

453

443

Current ratio

1.05

1.32

1.05

2.09

1.89

Calculation of Capital Employed and Related Indicators

For 12 months ended December 31

2013

2012

2011

(RUB billion)

Short‑term loans, other liabilities and current portion of long‑term debt

691

143

165

Long‑term debt

1,676

837

596

Cash and cash equivalents

(275)

(299)

 (166)

Short-term financial assets

(232)

(90)

 (155)

Net debt1

1,860

591

440

Shareholders' equity

3,126

2,283

2,068

Minority interest in subsidiaries' earnings

39

39

36

Equity

3,165

2,322

2,104

Capital employed

5,025

2,913

2,544

Average equity, including minority interest2

2,744

2,196

1,948

Average capital employed3

3,969

2,707

2,357

1 The net debt estimation is set presented in "Debt obligations" section.

2 Average equity including minority interest is calculated as a simple average of the equity including minority interest at the start and end of the given period.

3 Average capital employed is calculated as a simple average of the capital employed at the start and the end of the given period.

 

Calculation of Return on Average Capital Employed (ROACE)

For 12 months ended December 31

2013

2012

2011

(RUB billion, except %)

Operating income

555

412

469

Income tax expense

(81)

(104)

 (90)

Return used for calculation of ROACE

474

308

379

Average capital employed

3,969

2,707

2,357

ROACE

11.9%

11.4%

16.0%

 

Calculation of Return on Average Equity (ROAE)

For 12 months ended December 31

2013

2012

2011

(RUB billion, except %)

Net income

551

365

335

Average equity, including minority interest

2,744

2,196

1,948

ROAE, annualized where appropriate

20.1%

16.6%

17.2%

 

Appendix 1. Pro Forma of the Company's production and crude oil processing in the comparative periods of 2013 and 2012 for illustrative purposes only.

 

Financial and Operating Highlights in comparative periods of 2013 and 2012 are presented in accordance with unaudited pro forma *

For 12 months ended December 31,

%

change

2013

2012

Financial results, RUB billion

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

5,069

4,946

2.5%

EBITDA

1,033

1,032

0.1%

Net income

582

614

(5.2)%

Capital expenditures

593

618

(4.0)%

Operational results

Crude oil and NGLproduction (th. barrels per day)

4 189

4,155

0.8%

Gas production (th.boe per day)

679

554

22.6%

Product output in Russia (million tonnes)

84.95

83.56

1.7%

Product output outside Russia (million tonnes)

12.73

13.34

(4.6)%

*Proforma means the presentation of financial and operating results of TNK as if acquisition of new assets was on January 1, 2012.

 

Company's production of crude oil in the comparative periods of 2013 and 2012

For 3 months

ended

Change

For 12 months

ended

Change

December 31, 2013

September 30,

2013

December 31,

2013

December 31,

 2012

(million barrels)

(%)

(million barrels)

(%)

Yuganskneftegaz (Western Siberia)

122.6

122.3

0.2%

487.2

488.8

(0.3)%

Samaraneftegaz (Central Russia)

20.7

20.7

81.1

78.8

2.9%

Purneftegaz (Western Siberia)

11.8

11.9

(0.8)%

47.5

50.7

(6.3)%

Vankorneft (Eastern Siberia)

40.2

40.2

157.8

133.9

17.8%

Severnaya Neft (Timan Pechora)

5.5

5.6

(1.8)%

22.70

25.7

(11.7)%

Sakhalin-1 (Far East)

(net of royalty and government share)

2.3

2.3

8.7

8.7

JSC "Tomskneft" VNK (Western Siberia)

9.5

9.5

37.4

37.4

Samotlorneftegas

43.7

43.8

(0.2)%

174.1

187.5

(7.1)%

Orenburgneft

38.8

38.3

1.3%

151.8

153.9

(1.4)%

Verkhnechonskneftegaz

14.5

14.3

1.4%

56.6

52.9

7.0%

RN-Uvatneftegaz

17.7

17.3

2.3%

65.1

55.0

18.4%

Varyeganneftez

14.1

13.9

1.4%

55.6

58.5

(5.0)%

RN-Nyaganneftegaz

11.8

11.9

(0.8)%

47.3

51.9

(8.9)%

Taas-Yuryakh

1.6

1.6

Other

8.8

9.0

(2.2)%

36.1

37.1

(2.8)%

Crude oil production by fully and proportionately consolidated enterprises

363.6

361.0

0.7%

1 430.6

1,420.8

0.7%

Udmurtneft (Central Russia)

6.0

5.9

1.7%

23.6

23.5

0.4%

Polar Lights (Timan Pechora)

0.4

0.4

1.6

1.9

(15.8)%

Slavneft

15.1

15.4

(1.9)%

61.5

65.1

(5.5)%

Other

2.9

3.1

(6.5)%

11.8

9.5

24.2%

Total share in production of joint ventures

24.4

24.8

(1.6)%

98.5

100.0

(1.5)%

Total crude oil production

388.0

385.8

0.6%

1,529.1

1,520.8

0.5%

 

Company's production of gas* in comparative periods of 2013 and 2012

For 3 months ended

Change

For 12 months ended

Change

December 31, 2013

September 30,

2013

December 31,

2013

December 31,

 2012

(bcm)

(%)

(bcm)

(%)

Purneftegaz (Western Siberia)

1.06

1.06

4.17

4.07

2.5%

 

Yuganskneftegaz (Western Siberia)

1.07

0.98

9.2%

3.78

3.16

19.6%

 

Krasnodarneftegaz (Southern Russia)

0.85

0.73

16.4%

3.06

2.90

5.5%

 

Samaraneftegaz (Central Russia)

0.13

0.12

8.3%

0.50

0.53

(5.7)%

 

Severnaya Neft (Timan Pechora)

0.07

0.06

16.6%

0.26

0.29

(10.3)%

 

Vankorneft (Eastern Siberia)

0.27

0.11

145.5%

0.63

0.47

34.0%

 

Sakhalin-1 (Far East)(net of royalty and government share)

0.12

0.07

71.4%

0.40

0.34

17.6%

 

JSC "Tomskneft" VNK (Western Siberia)

0.24

0.19

26.3%

0.86

0.84

2.4%

 

NGK "ITERA" LLC

3.32

2.95

12.5%

6.27

-

-

 

Samotlorneftegaz

1.43

1.37

4.4%

5.54

5.96

(7.0)%

 

Rospan International

0.98

0.91

7.7%

3.73

3.49

6.9%

 

Orenburgneft

0.79

0.65

21.5%

2.76

2.48

11.3%

 

Varyeganneftez

0.79

0.71

11.3%

3.07

3.26

(5.8)%

 

RN-Nyaganneftegaz

0.38

0.36

5.6%

1.39

1.23

13.0%

 

Other

0.43

0.41

4.9%

1.89

2.28

(17.1)%

 

Gas production by fully and proportionately consolidated enterprises

11.93

10.68

11.7%

38.31

31.30

22.4%

 

 

NGK "ITERA" LLC

-

-

3.23

2.62

23.3%

 

Slavneft

0.10

0.10

-

0.40

0.41

(2.4)%

 

Other

0.04

0.04

-

0.17

0.15

13.3%

 

Total share in production of joint ventures

0.14

0.14

-

3.80

3.18

19.5%

 

 

Total gas production

12.07

10.82

11.6%

42.11

34.48

22.1%

 

* Production volume equals extracted volume minus flared volume.

 

Crude oil processing in comparative periods of 2013 and 2012

For 3 months ended

Change

For 12 months ended

Change

December 31, 2013

September 30,

2013

December 31,

2013

December 31,

 2012

(million of tonnes)

(%)

(million of tonnes)

(%)

Crude oil processing at refineries in Russia

21.41

22.63

(5.4)%

84.95

83.56

1.7%

Crude oil processing at refineries outside Russia

3.24

3.39

(4.4)%

12.73

13.34

(4.6)%

including crude oil processing at Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG)

2.78

2.76

0.7%

10.60

10.73

(1.2)%

including crude oil processing in Belarus, Ukraine

0.46

0.63

(27.0)%

2.13

2.61

(18.5)%

Total group crude oil processing

24.65

26.02

(5.3)%

97.68

96.90

0.8%

 

Main Risk Factors

 

Type of risk

Description and ways of minimizing the risk

INDUSTRY RISKS

Prices for crude oil, gas and petroleum products

Prices for crude oil, gas and petroleum products are the main factor determining financial and, indirectly, operational indicators of Rosneft's business. Prices for Company outputs depend mainly on world market conditions, and the balance of supply and demand in various Russian regions. Ability of the Company to control prices for its outputs is very limited.

Fall in prices for crude oil, gas or petroleum products has negative impact on the business results and financial position of Rosneft.

Decline of prices may lead to reduction in volumes of crude oil and gas, which the Company can produce profitably, and this may in turn lead to reduction in the volume of reserves, which can be efficiently developed, and to lower economic efficiency of prospecting and exploration programs.

Rosneft has sufficient opportunities for reallocating goods flows in case of significant price difference between domestic and international markets. The Company is also able to reduce capital and operating expenses quickly in order to meet its commitments in case of a sharp decline in prices for crude oil, gas and petroleum products.

Dependence on monopolistic providers of services for the transportation of crude oil, gas and petroleum products and on their tariffs

Rosneft depends on monopolistic providers for transportation of oil and oil products, and has no control over the infrastructure which they use and the charges which they levy.

OJSC Transneft, which is a state-owned natural monopoly, transports crude oil and petroleum products through the system of trunk pipelines. Rosneft has not incurred any serious losses due to breakdown or leakages from the pipeline system throughout the period of cooperation. However, any serious disruption in operation of the Transneft pipeline system or restriction on access to its capacities could prevent transportation of crude oil and petroleum products, with adverse effect on Rosneft's operating results and financial position.

Rosneft, as well as other Russian oil producing companies, has to pay for transportation services provided by Transneft. The level of tariffs charged by Transneft for its transport services is regulated by the Federal Tariff Service. Failure to pay for transportation services may result in cancellation or suspension of Rosneft's access to the pipeline system with adverse effect on operating results and financial position of the Company. Transneft periodically raises the level of tariffs for use of its pipeline system, increasing Rosneft's expenses, and this has adverse effect on business results and financial position of the Company.

Similar risks attach to use of the pipeline system of OJSC Gazprom.

The Company also depends on transportation of crude oil and petroleum products by railway.

OJSC Russian Railways ('RZhD') is a state-owned natural monopoly providing transportation services by railway. RZhD tariffs are subject to antimonopoly control, they have been on a traditional rising trend. Further tariff increases lead to increase

of expenses for crude oil and petroleum product transportation, and may have adverse effect on the Company's business results and financial position.

Geographical and climate conditions

Rosneft operates in regions that have stable climates and are not generally subject to natural hazards and disasters. However, abnormally low temperatures during the winter in a number of northern regions may complicate operations of the Company's oil production enterprises.

It is possible that such occurrences as the recent flood, which affected many Russia's Far East regions, would repeat in future. Rosneft is one of the natural monopolists at the Russia's Far East and its activities in flooded regions were aimed at creating the most favorable conditions for affected citizens and businesses for economic revival. This work was designed along two major lines: first of all - protection of employees, security arrangement and protection of businesses infrastructure from flood threat, and second - reliable, uninterrupted fuel supply to all consumers of the affected area. Komsomolsk Refinery - major Rosneft's enterprise at the Russia's Far East - worked steadily and normally throughout the disaster.

Hold-ups in functioning of export terminals may be caused by climate conditions in the areas of their locations.

Rosneft dispatches a part of its crude oil export via Company-owned sea port terminals and terminals controlled by Transneft. Petroleum products are exported via Company-owned sea port terminals in Tuapse (Krasnodar Territory) and Nakhodka (Primorsky Territory).

Exports via Black Sea terminals to Mediterranean ports may be restricted by throughput capacity of the Bosphorus Strait and by weather conditions (storm winds) in the Black Sea during the autumn. Also, severe ice conditions may lead to closure of export terminals on the Baltic Sea and at De-Kastri (Khabarovsk Territory) during the winter.

Any extended hold-ups in functioning of export terminals may have adverse effect on the Company's operating results and financial position.

Ability to reallocate goods flows enables Rosneft to minimize a part of its logistics risks.

Sale of gas output

Rosneft is exposed to several risks in connection with sale of the gas it produces. The Unified Gas Supply System ('UGSS') is owned and operated by OJSC Gazprom and transports practically all gas in Russia. Under existing regulations, Gazprom should provide access to UGSS for all internal independent suppliers on an equal basis, since Gazprom itself does not fully use capacity of the system. However, these 'equal access' regulations may not operate. Moreover, by virtue of its priority right to use of UGSS capacities,

OJSC Gazprom has substantial freedom in assigning third-party access to the system.

Prices for gas sold by the company in Russia are regulated by the RF Government. Regulated prices are reflected in the price for gas, which Rosneft sells to OJSC Gazprom or its subsidiaries. If rates of increase of regulated gas prices are lower than expected, this may

have adverse effect on business results and the financial position of the Company.

Further growth in gas output as well as increasing gas sales to independent regional traders and independent industrial

consumers will depend on sufficient access to UGSS capacities, which are not guaranteed at present.

The Company minimizes these risks by reaching agreements with Gazprom and by using conservative forecasts for gas price growth when taking decisions on implementation of gas projects.

Factual amounts of reserves

Crude oil and gas reserve data are only estimates and are inherently uncertain. The actual size of reserves may differ materially from these estimates.

Data on oil & gas reserves in the present report are estimative and are based mainly on the results of internal analytical work by the company DeGolyer&MacNaughton, which is an independent consultant to Rosneft on petroleum engineering issues.

Petroleum engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. Estimates of the value and amount of economically recoverable crude oil and gas reserves, rates of production, net present value of future cash flows and the timing of development expenditures necessarily depend upon several variables and assumptions.

Many of the assumptions, which have been used in reserve estimation, do not depend on the Company and may turn out to be inaccurate over time. Estimate of reserves and use of alternative systems of reserve calculation in accordance with the Russian system of reserve classification are inevitably subject to many uncertainties. Accurate estimation of any reserves and resources depends on the quality of available information and interpretation of petroleum engineering and geological data. Exploration drilling, interpretation of data, testing and production, which are carried out after the estimates are made, could require significant upward or downward adjustment of data on Rosneft's reserves and resources. Moreover, different reserve assessment specialists may give differing estimates of reserves and of potential income from those reserves on the basis of the same data. Factual amounts of production, revenues and expenses associated with reserves and resources, will differ from estimative figures, and these differences may be substantial.

There are also various uncertainties associated with the Russian system of reserve classification, which takes only geological factors into consideration and does not consider financial viability of extracting reserves.

Exploration drilling is also associated with numerous risks, including the risk that oil & gas companies will not discover oil & gas reserves that are commercially productive.

Rosneft carries out exploration work in various geographical regions, including territories with unfavorable climatic conditions and high levels of expenses. Expenses for drilling, construction and operation of wells are often partially undefined. As a result, Rosneft may incur additional costs or be constrained to downsize, suspend or cease drilling work due to a variety of factors, including: unforeseen geological conditions, encountered during drilling

work; anomalous levels of formation pressure (either high or low), heterogeneity in geological formations, equipment breakdowns and accidents, unfavorable weather, the need to observe environmental law and prescriptions by Government agencies, and shortages or late delivery of drilling rigs and equipment.

If Rosneft is unable to carry out efficient exploration work or acquire assets, which contain confirmed reserves, the amount of its confirmed reserves will diminish proportionally to production as those reserves are exhausted. Future production by the Company depends to a significant extent on successful discovery, acquisition and development of oil & gas fields. If efforts by Rosneft do not prove successful, this will lead to reduction in the total amount of the Company's confirmed reserves and lowering of production volumes, which will have adverse effect on business results and the financial position of the Company.

Rosneft is a world leader by amounts of oil reserves and has an enormous resource base, which minimizes risks associated with decline of oil production due to future revision of reserve amounts.

Competition risks

The oil & gas industry is intensely competitive. Rosneft competes mainly with other leading Russian oil & gas companies in the following areas of business:

• purchase of exploration and production licenses at auctions and sales held by Russian Government agencies;

• acquisition of other Russian companies, that may already own mineral licenses or existing assets associated with hydrocarbon production;

• engaging the services of leading independent service companies, whose capacity to render the required services may be limited;

• obtaining equipment for capital projects, which may be in short supply;

• employment of highly skilled and experienced staff;

• acquisition of existing retail enterprises and of land plots to develop new retail enterprises;

• acquisition of, or gaining access to, oil refining facilities.

Rosneft is among industry leaders in Russia and globally, which substantially improves its competitive positions. The Company has a substantial portfolio of new projects to maintain and strengthen its competitive positions in the future.

Rosneft may encounter risks arising from intensification of competition in sale of its production on domestic and external markets. The following steps are being taken to minimize risks in sale of petroleum products on the domestic market in a context of intense competition:

• capacity loading of Company refineries is planned with due regard to market forecasts in order to avoid inventory build-up of certain petroleum products;

• the Company uses the Russia-wide structure of its oil refining and oil product wholesaling business and system of counterparties to best advantage in order to quickly reallocate regional goods flows on the domestic market and to ensure rapid adjustment of volumes between the domestic market and export;

• upgrading work, which is being carried out at refineries, will increase refining depth, helping to meet growing demand for high-octane gasolines and petroleum products with low sulphur content;

• the Company is working continuously to develop its own network of filling stations and refueling complexes meeting the latest European standards, since retail is the most stable segment for petroleum product sales on the domestic market, being less subject to sudden price fluctuations and falls in demand in comparison

with other segments. A system of payment for fuel sales at filling stations using electronic cards is widely used in order to attract more customers (particularly corporate customers) and Rosneft stations can also serve cards of other providers.

Geographical diversity, which enables reallocation of crude oil and petroleum product deliveries from one region to another, is one of the most effective means of managing competition risk on export markets. For example, opening of an export route via Arkhangelsk and Murmansk and arrangements for crude oil deliveries by railway to China has created an opportunity for adjusting export flows by opening markets in the Far East, South-East Asia and the USA. This has been done by reducing traditional export flows through Black and Baltic Sea ports and Transneft's Druzhba pipeline, all of which are oriented to Europe.

 

COUNTRY AND REGIONAL RISKS

Country and region

Rosneft has operations in all Federal Districts of the Russian Federation. Development prospects for the Federal Districts are discussed in the Program for Medium-term Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation. Risks of military conflicts, public disturbance, strikes and declaration of a state of emergency in regions of Company operations are negligible.

The Company notes possible influence of risks related to international political environment on its activities.

The Company is also exposed to risks related to its international operations. These are countries with developing markets and are more prone to political, economic, social and legal risks than countries with more developed markets. Overall, the risks related to carrying out business activities in these countries are comparable or higher than those related to business operations in Russia, including due to possible changes in international political environment. In order to minimize its economic and financial risks Rosneft strives to diversify its types of business and the regions where it carries out investment projects, expanding the geography of its business and the nature of its various projects.

In case of the occurrence of risks, associated with the political, economic and social situation in Russia as a whole or in specific regions, and risks associated with fluctuations in the global economy, the Company will take whatever measures are possible to limit their negative impact. The parameters of such measures will depend on the specifics of the situation, in each particular case.

The Company plans to carry out the following measures of a general nature to maintain its business in case of negative

impact due to country or regional changes:

• to take whatever measures are possible to support projects, which are already being developed with the Company's support;

• to work closely with executive bodies of the Government of the Russian Federation, administrative regions of the Russian Federation and municipal government bodies;

• to optimize and limit expenses.

Changes in the country and its regions, the nature and frequency of such changes and related risks are hardly predictable, as well as their influence on future activities of the Company. In case of such changes that may negatively affect its activities, the Company would make every possible effort to minimize their negative impact.

FINANCIAL RISKS

Currency

Most of Rosneft's gross revenue is generated from export of crude oil and petroleum products. Consequently, fluctuations in exchange rates of currencies against the ruble have impact on the Company's business results, subjecting the Company to currency risk.

The Company's currency risk is substantially reduced by the existence of expenses that are denominated in foreign currency. Rosneft is a large borrower in the international debt capital markets, and the bulk of its loans are denominated in US dollars. Current liabilities for servicing these loans are also denominated in dollars.

This currency structure of revenues and liabilities acts as an in-built hedging mechanism, where factors compensate one another by acting in opposite directions and minimize the impact of currency risk on the Company's business results.

Changes in interest rates

As a major borrower, Rosneft is exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates. The Company's primary source of debt financing is international debt capital markets. The majority of its debt portfolio is represented by US dollar-denominated loans that bear interest at rates determined with reference to LIBOR and EURIBOR interbank loan rates. Accordingly, an increase in LIBOR/EURIBOR rates can lead to higher costs of debt servicing, which, in turn, may adversely affect the Company's solvency and liquidity.

To manage liquidity risks the Company primarily uses internal instruments and reserves for financial risks management, allowing the Company to guarantee discharge of its obligations.

The Company has credit ratings of investment levels by leading international rating agencies: Moody's (Ваа1), Fitch (BBB-) and S&P (BВB).

Inflation

Change in the consumer price index has some impact on the Company's financial position. However, existing and forecast levels of inflation are far from critical for the Company and the oil & gas industry as a whole. The Company is not taking any special measures to reduce this risk, viewing it as insignificant.

LEGAL RISKS

Regulatory authorities inspections

Rosneft was included into the plan of scheduled inspections of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs for 2013 by the Central Body of the Federal Service for Supervision of Natural Resources ("Rosprirodnadzor") in accordance with Order by Rosprirodnadzor No. 581 dated 31.10.2012. The routine field inspection was carried out from September 23 till December 16, 2013 based upon Order No. 564 dated 09.09.2013 as revised by Orders of Rosprirodnadzor No. 618 dated 08.10.2013 and No. 642 dated 23.10.2013.

The inspection checked compliance with legislation on geological survey, sustainable use and management of mineral resources, as well as with regulatory requirements in the area of mineral resources and environment protection.

An act was drawn following the results of the inspection (16.12.2013).

As of 31.03.2014 administrative procedures following the results of the inspection were partially completed, including completion of administrative procedures in the state geological supervision area. The inspection did not reveal grounds for early termination, suspension or limitation of exploration rights of the Company.

Directive were issued with regard to Rosneft to apply administrative sanctions in the form of fines. The total amount of fines would not materially affect operating results or financial standing of the Company.

Administrative procedures in the state environmental control area have not yet been completed.

Changes to currency regulation

Rosneft is heavily involved in foreign economic relations. Part of the Company's assets and liabilities are denominated in foreign currency. So the Government mechanism of currency regulation has impact on Company business.

Overall, Russian legislation governing currency regulation and currency control did not undergo substantial changes having impact on the business of Rosneft during the reporting period.

Rosneft constantly monitors changes in currency legislation and strictly adheres to the provisions of legislation in the sphere of foreign currency.

Changes to tax legislation

The most substantial changes to tax legislation in the reporting period are:

• amendment of procedure for pretrial tax settlements, i.e. a taxpayer is obliged at a pre-trial stage to contest all non-regulatory acts of tax bodies, their actions (failure to act); a term for preparing an appeal petition to the higher tax authority is extended; process of reviewing an appeal in a higher tax authority is described in more detail; commencement date of a time limit for a taxpayer for having recourse to the court is clarified, etc.;

 • inclusion of provisions differentiating MET tax rate depending on reservoir permeability coefficient, field depletion degree and the size of oil reservoir. In particular, decreasing coefficients of the MET rate for oil production at subsoil areas containing hard-to-recover oil reserves are determined;

• establishing a new procedure for calculation of property tax with regard to business centers, shopping centers, office buildings, consumer services facilities, as well as property facilities of foreign organizations, which do not work in Russia through permanent representative offices. For such property items the tax base is determined as cadastral value of property units;

 • extension for 2014 of validity of para. 3 p. 1.1 Art. 269 of the Tax Code of the RF, providing for a possibility to incorporate the interest amount on debts, which is equal to the interest rate established by agreement of the parties, but not exceeding the refinancing rate of the Bank of Russia multiplied by 1.8, while executing a debt instrument in rubles, and equal to product of the refinancing rate of the Bank of Russia and coefficient 0.8, while executing a debt instrument in foreign currency;

• indexation of excise rates for automotive gasoline, diesel fuel, straight-run gasoline and engine oils for gasoline and (or) carburettor (injection) engines for the period 2013-2014, setting of new excise rates for 2015, and additions to the list of goods that are subject to excises;

• indexation of rates of mineral extraction tax for natural gas and gas condensate in 2013-2015;

• exemption from property tax for movable property of organizations, which was recorded in accounts from 01.01.2013;

• cancellation of preferences in taxation of the property of organizations and setting of maximum tax rates with respect to railways in public use, trunk pipelines, electricity transmission

cables, and structures, which are an integral functioning part of these facilities.

Tax legislation is a particularly changeable branch of law, where legal statutes are subject to frequent amendments, additions and clarifications. In order to reduce risks associated with changes in tax law the Company carries out careful analysis of law drafts and newly passed legal acts in the field of taxation. Rosneft constantly monitors changes to tax legislation and assesses and forecasts the impact of such changes on its business, so that likelihood of risks arising in connection with amendments to legislation on tax and duties that have come into force is not high.

Changes to rules for customs control and duties

Rosneft is involved in foreign economic relations, and is therefore subject to several risks that arise from changes to legislation governing foreign economic relations, and to customs legislation governing procedures for transportation of goods across the customs border, the establishment and application of customs regimes, and the setting, introduction and levying of customs charges.

Customs regulation is carried out in accordance with international agreements of the Russian Federation in the area of customs issues, with the provisions of the Customs Code of the Customs Union, the Federal Law on Customs Regulation, the decision of the Eurasian Economic Commission, the Federal Law on the Customs Tariff and other federal laws and legal acts adopted in accordance with such laws in the sphere of Government regulation of foreign trade.

In accordance with Federal Law № 239-FZ dated 03.12.2012 on Amendments to the Russian Federation Law on Customs Tariff the procedure for the setting of export duties on crude oil and certain categories of goods obtained from crude oil was changed on 01.04.2013.

Under the new procedure the Government defines a formula for the calculation of export duties, taking account of the average price of Urals crude, and an authorized Government body calculates the duty rates, and the rates are recalculated each month and made known to participants in international trade operations through official sources. Executive Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 155 dated 26.02.2013 the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade has been appointed as such authorized body.

The law, with regards to export customs duties, sets maximum levels of the calculated export duty rates depending on prices for crude oil on international markets. Special formulas are established by the Russian Government for calculating export duty rates on high-viscosity crude oil and crude oil with particular physical and chemical features.

No special discounted rates for crude oil of Vankor and VCNG fields were established in the reporting period.

Monitoring of customs legislation during the reporting period did not reveal material developments or amendments influencing Rosneft's activities, so that likelihood of risks arising in connection with amendments to customs legislation is insignificant.

Changes to antimonopoly legislation

Rosneft has significant shares of wholesale markets in the Russian Federation for motor gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel and fuel oil, so Company business in this sphere is subject to additional requirements designed to protect competition, entailing risks associated with changes to antimonopoly legislation. Antimonopoly regulation is carried out in accordance with Russian federal laws and legal acts associated with these laws.

Joint Order of the FAS of Russia and the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation on Approval of Minimum Quantities of Petroleum Products to be Sold at Exchange and Requirements to Exchange Trading for Deals with Petroleum Products by Entities with Dominant Positions on the Relevant Goods Markets ("Order") came into force on 16.07.2013. Since enforcement of the Order the Company, to create intrinsic exchange indicators, which will be recognized as market regulators by the regulator, shall monthly sell through the exchange no less than determined minimal volumes of petroleum products established by the Order, and at the same time comply with other requirements to exchange trading established by the Order. The Company complies with these demands.

Besides, certain constrains to the Company's activity were imposed by Improvement Notice of the FAS of Russia dated 29.12.2012, issued following coordination of acquisition of TNK-ВР Limited and its subsidiary TNK Industrial Holdings Limited. These constrains primarily refer to the requirement to agree with the FAS of Russia the Procedure for selling and pricing petroleum products on the domestic market, as well as requirements to sell some of the filling stations in several regions, where the Company's dominant position would be enhanced due to ТНК-ВР integration.

Rosneft constantly monitors both amendments to existing legislation and law drafts, which are in preparation, assessing the nature of any amendments and taking them into account in its business in order to minimize risks arising from changes in antimonopoly requirements. The Company takes all necessary measures in its business while selling petroleum products on the domestic market to minimize the risks indicated above, constantly monitoring market price levels and making full use of market instruments when carrying out sales of petroleum products, and also implementing other recommendations of antimonopoly bodies which are intended to ensure that petroleum product pricing is economically justified.

Legal regulation of sub-soil use

Onshore and continental shelf sub-soil use legislation is a key component of legal regulation of Rosneft's core business activities, wherefore the Company monitors amendments to current industry-specific legislation and takes account of them in its business.

During the reporting period regulatory control of onshore sub-soil usage was amended as follows:

· a new procedure for organizing and conducting competitions and auctions for usage rights at sub-soil areas of federal status gas been determined. Specifically, it has been established that tendering for usage rights at areas with federal status must be carried out through an auction process only (amendments to Law of the Russian Federation No. 2395-I dated 21.02.1992 "Sub-soil Law").

These amendments have essentially legalized established practices of an auction form for granting the use of sub-soil areas of federal status, as competitions organized by government bodies for hydrocarbon fields have very rarely been held using a tendering format.

· economics pertaining to legal arrangements of sub-soil use have been worked out in detail, in particular, an amount of one-time payment for the use of sub-soil resources payable by a sub-soil user, that had gained the right to use a sub-soil area outside of a competition or an auction has been specified (RF Government Decree No. 646 dated 30.07.2013); the procedure and formula for calculation of the extent of damage caused to sub-soil resources due to breach of industry legislation has been determined (RF Government Decree No. 564 dated 04.07.2013).

Within the frameworks of Russian continental shelf sub-soil use legislation:

- notions of "artificial islands", "installations, structures" have been determined;

- subjects that have the right to construct artificial islands, installations and structures have been formalized;

- requirements to a prevention of emergency situations ("ES") plan, envisaging actions aimed at prevention of and response to oil and petroleum products spills in marine environment have been specified.

These amendments are aimed at enhancement of legal regulation of activities in the Russian continental shelf, further progress in the industry-specific legislations is expected through development of bylaws, providing specifics of the relevant norms.

Legislation regarding land use and urban construction

Adherence to legislation regarding land use and urban construction if one of Rosneft's priorities, as land is a key object in Company's activities.

In 2013 there were no amendments to the land or urban construction legislation that have or might have material influence on the Company's activities.

However some amendments of the industry-specific legislation of "technical" nature will be taken into account by the Company in its current activities in relevant spheres, such as:

- obtaining approvals for facilities commissioning.

In accordance with RF Government Decree dated 01.03.2013, the documents submitted under part 4, Art. 55 of the Urban Construction Code of the Russian Federation in order to get an approval for commissioning a capital facility, shall include technical design prepared in electronic form.

- registering agreements and other deals.

In particular, starting from October 1, 2013 a procedure for State registration of agreements and other deals in electronic form was introduced, as well as a possibility for forwarding various notifications in electronic form. The State registration of accrual and transfer of property rights is certified, at right holder's option, either by the State Registration Certificate or by an excerpt from the Single State Register of Property Rights and Transactions Therewith. A paper form is required by law for the Certificate only.

Health, safety and environment

A large number of facilities used by Rosneft in its business fall within hazardous category. In order to eliminate risks of industrial nature in Company's activities, as well as minimize environmental impact, Rosneft adheres to provisions of legislation related to control of operation of hazardous production facilities.

During the reporting period as a part of setting up an effective system of hazardous production facilities management:

- classification of hazardous production facilities ("HPF"), with consideration of the degree of risk of accidents and scale of potential impact, was introduced. Hazard class shall be assigned to a HPF in the process of its registration in the State Register of HPFs;

- binding justification of HPFs safety was introduced, regulatory declaration of industrial safety is limited to HPFs of hazard class I and II.

- with regard to HPFs of hazard class I, a constant state monitoring mode was established, envisaging a possibility for permanent presence of representatives of the state oversight authorities at the high-risk facilities and conducting controlling actions on safety conditions monitoring and compliance with safety program activities.

Scheduled inspections of organizations and individual entrepreneurs operating HPFs of hazard class I and II shall be conducted not more frequently than once a year, and of hazard class III - not more frequently than once every three years. Scheduled inspections of HPFs of hazard class IV are not envisaged.

- temporary practice for maintaining the State Register of HPFs, as it is necessary to carry out re-registration of HPFs and assign relevant hazard class before January 1, 2014.

In elaboration of measures aimed at establishing an efficient system of hazardous production facilities management, a new procedure for licensing explosive, flammable and chemically hazardous production facilities was established.

A license is required to use facilities of hazard class I, II and III; facilities of hazard class IV do not need licensing. A specific list of works requiring permit was provided. Licensing requirements were amended.

It should be noted that licenses for use of explosive and flammable production facilities and licenses for use of chemically hazardous production facilities, issued before 01.07.2013, in accordance with p. 5 Art. 10 of Federal Law No.22-FZ dated 04.03.2013, are valid after enforcement of this Federal Law and give the licensee the right to use explosive, flammable and chemically hazardous production facilities of hazard class I, II and III according to the list of works specified in these licenses.

In the light of the above, the Company or its Group Companies do not need reissuing of earlier licenses, and the risks related to lack of licenses to use explosive, flammable and chemically hazardous production facilities of hazard class I, II and III are minimal.

Current court cases in which the Company is involved

Rosneft has previously participated or is currently participating in the following court cases, which may have substantial impact on the Company's financial results:

1) In 2006 the International Commercial Arbitrage Court of the Russian Chamber of Commerce upheld claims by Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. for recovery of debt from OJSC Yuganskneftegaz (the legal predecessor of Rosneft Oil Company) under four loan agreements: RUB 11,233.0 mln loan principal, RUB 1,702.9 mln accrued interest and USD 0.9 mln arbitrage fees and court costs ('Arbitrage Verdicts'). Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. made an application to the Court of Amsterdam (Netherlands) for the Arbitrage Verdicts to be upheld and implemented in the Netherlands. In May 2007 Rosneft successfully contested the Arbitrage Verdicts in the Moscow Arbitrage Court based on procedural violations in the earlier court case. This decision was upheld by appeal and supervisory courts in the Russian Federation. On 28.02.2008 the Amsterdam Court refused to uphold the Arbitrage Verdicts and order their execution in the Netherlands. On 28.04.2009 the Amsterdam Appeal Court overturned the ruling of the Amsterdam Court and ordered that the Arbitrage Verdicts should be executed in the Netherlands. The Supreme Court of the Netherlands ruled on 25.06.2010 that an appeal by the Company against the ruling of the Amsterdam Appeal Court of 28.04.2009 should not be heard.

In addition to the legal case in the Netherlands, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. made a further claim in 2009 and at the beginning of 2010 for the Arbitrage Verdicts to be upheld and implemented in the USA, in England and Wales, Ireland, and Jersey, and also for awarding interest on the amounts referred to in the Arbitrage Verdicts. In accordance with a court order by the English court on 06.04.2010, the Company agreed to provide security agreed by the parties for purposes of the courts cases in England and the Netherlands, and the court cases in the USA, Ireland, and Jersey were terminated.

As stated above, on 28.06.2010 the Supreme Court of the Netherlands ruled that the appeal by the Company against the verdict of the Amsterdam Appeal Court dated April 28, 2010 should not be heard. Although Rosneft disagrees with the rulings of the aforementioned Dutch courts, on 11.08.2010 it made a payment equivalent to the amounts indicated in the Arbitrage Verdicts.

Apart from the above-mentioned payments, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. is maintaining its application to the High Court of Justice in London for payment of interest, calculated by reference to legal statutes, amounting to USD 160 mln at the time when the application was made. On 14.06.2011 the London High Court delivered a provisional verdict on two preliminary matters, which it had agreed to consider before delivering a verdict on the substance of the claim. Although the Court found in favour of Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. in both instances, it allowed Rosneft to appeal against the decisions. On July 27, 2012 the English Appeal Court delivered a verdict in favour of Rosneft on one of the two preliminary matters. Neither of the sides sought any further appeal. After the case was returned to the High Court, the Court delivered a procedural verdict on 27.02.2013 calling for hearings on further preliminary matters of the competence of the Court to enact cancelled verdicts of the International Commercial Arbitrage Court in accordance with the standards of English common law and to decide whether Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. in principle has the right to seek payment of interest on sums awarded by the International Commercial Arbitrage Court in English courts. The High Court has set dates for hearings on the further preliminary matters - from 13 till 15 May, 2014. The Company intends to make every effort to defend its position in the remaining court proceedings in England.

2) In 2007 CJSC Vesta Investment Company, which is a shareholder of Rosneft, brought a claim in the Moscow Arbitrage Court for four loan agreements between the company Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. as lender and OJSC Yuganskneftegaz as borrower to be declared void (fictitious). Total amount of the borrowing under the terms of the disputed agreements is RUB 11.2 bln. Rosneft, as the legal successor of OJSC Yuganskneftegaz, is participating in the proceedings as co-defendant. On 11.07.2012 the Moscow Arbitrage Court ruled the loans to be invalid. On 15.10.2012 the Ninth Arbitrage Appeal Court ruled that the verdict of the first-level court should be left unchanged. The ruling of the Moscow District Federal Arbitrage Court dated 14.03.13 the abovementioned court acts are left unchanged. On 31.07.13 the Supreme Arbitrage Court of the RF dismissed a request by Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. for review of the above decisions by way of judicial supervision.

3) In 2007 the company Glendale Group Ltd. presented a claim against Rosneft to the Court in Amsterdam (the Netherlands) for RUB 3.53 bln of debt principal, interest on promissory notes (18% annualized), interest and late payment charges, justifying the application by the existence of a RUB 3.53 bln debt on eight promissory notes issued by OJSC Yuganskneftegaz in 2003. Rosneft contests legality of the declared claims on various grounds. On 29.05.13 the Amsterdam District Court delivered the verdict dismissing the claim of Glendale Group Ltd. in respect of 2 out of 8 promissory notes, being subject of the dispute, and supported requirements of Glendale Group Ltd. regarding remaining 6 promissory notes, ordering Rosneft to pay Glendale Group Ltd. an amount of RUB 3.53 bln plus interest and late payment charges. The court allowed Rosneft to transfer the adjudicated debt on an escrow account while awaiting a decision on the appeal.

On 27.08.13 Rosneft filed a notice on appeal for court decision of 29.05.13. Full justification of the appeal was filed by Rosneft on 25.03.14. Determination of hearings procedure in the appeal court is forthcoming.

4) The company Yukos International UK BV has initiated court proceedings against Rosneft and other co-defendants not affiliated with Rosneft in the Amsterdam District Court, demanding the compensation of losses amounting to USD 333 mln as well as interest accrued as established by law since February 7, 2011, together with costs. In these proceedings Yukos International UK BV is claiming damages, which were allegedly caused by delivery by the Amsterdam Court in 2007 of an order for the arrest of a bank account, which, as Yukos International UK BV claims, limited its ability to invest certain amounts at its discretion. The first court hearings on this matter were held on June 27, 2012. On October 3, 2012 Rosneft filed an objection to the claim. Yukos International UK BV submitted an application in response to the objection on February 20, 2013. Hearings took place on 09.01.2014 and in the process of the hearings Yukos International UK BV was allowed to amend its claims. As a result Yukos International UK BV presented claims to Rosneft on the grounds of collective responsibility as well, and the aim of such amendment is to impose responsibility of one of the defendants to Rosneft. The Company has presented reply to modified claims on 26.02.2014. Court decision is forthcoming.

5) Individuals - shareholders of RN Holding filed claims against Rosneft, the third party is RN Holding, to oblige Rosneft to send to shareholders of RN Holding - owners of other shares of respective categories (types) and owners of issuance securities convertible into such shares - a public offer for acquisition of such securities from them according to the procedure established by the Russian legislation. On 25.10.2013 the Moscow Arbitrage Court dismissed these actions and these decisions were upheld by an appeal court.

Rosneft is also involved in a number of other courts cases, which arise in the course of its ordinary business and do not entail substantial financial risk for the Company.

Rosneft regularly monitors verdicts delivered by higher courts and assesses trends in the interpretation of laws at the level of regional arbitrage courts, making full use of its monitoring data both for the purposes of defending its rights and lawful interests in court and for regulation of issues that arise in the course of Company business. Risks associated with changes in court practice are therefore believed to be insignificant.

 

Science and Innovation

In 2013, Rosneft continued working on enhancing its intellectual and technological advantage by funding cutting-edge in-house R&D development, supporting Russia's leading universities and R&D centers, and creating joint R&D centers with leading international companies.

The Company's 2013 innovations budget was RUB 148.1 bln. It filed 52 patent applications for inventions, utility models and software to be protected by intellectual property rights, nearly tripling the number of such applications registered in the previous year.

 

2013 Main Achievements in Key Projects:

· A technology for tight reservoirs development was implemented in OOO RN-Yuganskneftegaz fields, 32 wells were drilled in 2013 delivering incremental production of 167 kt.

· Two unique expeditions - KARA-Winter 2013, KARA-Summer 2013 - were carried out to investigate the ice conditions and conduct metocean studies in support of offshore resource E&A and development projects in the south-western part of the Kara Sea.

During the expedition, a number of ice and metocean measurements on 22 ice stations were done, automatic buoys were installed on 14 ice fields and 16 icebergs in order to record their drift, aerial photography of icebergs and hummock ice ridges was done using a helicopter and a drone, as well as subsea photography of hummock and iceberg keels. Aerial photography of 66 iceberg routes was done from a Ka-32 helicopter. Over 2500 measurements and tests of ice and iceberg cores were made. A remotely operated vehicle was used to investigate sea bottom scouring.

The data obtained were used to develop recommendations regarding design solutions to ensure offshore structures reliability and strength and equipment protection from adverse environmental impacts.

· In 2013, new oil and gas condensate and gas condensate plays were discovered on the territory of the Irkutsk Region, Mogdinskiy license block. An inflow of up to 425 kcm/day of gas and condensate and 90 cm/day of oil was recorded. This was made possible by using an in-house geological model developed by specialists from the Company's Innovations Block.

· The Company has developed and is implementing well completion technologies with multi-stage hydraulic fracturing in tight reservoirs. The expected effect is up to 300 t/day per well.

· An innovative 3S-separation gas treatment facility with a throughput of 160mcmpa has been developed and will be installed at the Pravdinskaya Compressor Station, RN-Yuganskneftegaz, to ensure the required amount of gas for RN-Yuganskneftegaz own needs and supplies to Poikovskiy village.

The facility will also produce 11kcmpa of stable condensate from associated gas, which is going to be sold to third party consumers at market prices.

The uniqueness of the facility comes from using an associated petroleum treatment technology (3S-separation) based on a low-temperature ultrasonic gas separator that uses state-of-the-art aerodynamic technology.

 

· A patent was issued for a utility model, "A Device for Casing Repair or Selective Reservoir Isolation". The technology will enable reactivation of over 400 idle wells with the total post-reactivation flow rate of over 2000 t/day.

· The first stage of pilot testing of equipment for dual production and injection was done by OJSC Udmurtneft and OJSC Samarateftegaz, candidate wells were selected for each BHA, and test equipment was run in 3 wells, which achieved a steady-state flow. Four patents for 3 dual production assemblies and 1 dual injection assembly were issued. The Company can potentially implement these technologies in 100 wells per annum with incremental oil production of ca. 350 ktpa.

· Algorithms and software were developed in 15 subsidiaries and 8 corporate R&D and Design Institutes, making it possible to address unique flow modeling and reservoir management issues, including:

- ensuring monitoring and real-time adjustment of horizontal well drilling trajectories based on LWD data;

- application in tight reservoir development (Priobskoye and Prirazlomnoye fields) whose recoverable reserves, are 150 mm t.;

- ensuring optimum well pad designing and field development planning based on the reservoir long-term proxy model.

· Jointly with the Catalysis Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russia Academy of Sciences, a technology for pilot fluidized-bed reforming catalyst production was developed. Commercialization of the technology will provide for a 1-2% increase in the reformate yield (high-octane component of motor and jet fuels) vs. known foreign analogues.

· As part of looking into alternative energy, the Company, jointly with the Biochemical Physics Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences, and the Moscow state University, is conducting fundamental and technology-focused research developing and improving 3-rd generation thin-film solar cells based on metal-oxide solar cells (MO SC). Applications for 2 invention patents have been filed, "Bilateral Solar Photo Converter" and "Solar Photo Converter". A test facility was designed and installed on the roof of the Biochemical Physics Institute building, which consists of 5 different types of solar panels.

The ultimate project goal is development of a technology for manufacturing a new type of solar cells and solar panels which could be 2-3 times less expensive than existing analogues.

 

Rosneft R&D Center - Advanced Oil Refining and Petrochemical Technologies

The Company's Innovations Block organization includes the Rosneft Research and Development Center (RN-R&D Center, LLC). The Center has GTL technologies and is now completing mini-GTL technology development. It can also offer unique technologies for catalyst production fit for this process.

Rosneft R&D Center is one of the key residents in the Skolkovo Innovations Center with annual funding of RUB 350 mln.

The corporate RN-R&D Center has developed cutting-edge oil refining and petrochemical technologies:

- a technology for producing a broad variety of synthetic base oils with the 130 - 170 viscosity index and minus 50 °С - minus 60°С pour point for different applications. This innovative technology can reduce feed and power costs by 10 - 15 %.

- a new technology, unrivaled in the Russian Federation, has been developed enabling the creation of own feed base to manufacture high-value polymer materials which could replace imported materials.

- new polymer composite materials (glass- and carbon-fiber) have been developed, which on a number of parameters are superior to the best known commercial examples. In addition, their cost is significantly lower due to availability and low price of the feed material, dicyclopentadiene, a product currently not by petrochemical plants.

The new materials are already demanded by the electrical engineering industry. Materials are being developed for oil and natural gas production, refining and transportation - light polymer proppants, materials for exploration and oil production, polymer and polymer composite pipe, fittings and other hydrocarbon-resistant equipment to be used in aggressive environments. Such materials are needed in the aircraft- automobile- and shipbuilding industries. New-generation smart materials are needed for micro-electronics, optronics, and medicine.

According to the Company plans, the next few years will see manufacturing of 15-20 kt of advanced polymer composite materials needed by developing innovative technologies.

 

Advanced Technologies Adaptation and Implementation in 2013

In 2013, as part of developing and executing projects within the New Technologies System (NTS), monitoring, testing, adapting, and implementing new promising technologies developed by Russian and foreign companies was organized.

In 2013, incremental production from testing new technologies was in excess of 200 kt.

All tested technologies will be evaluated for their economic efficiency, then scaled up and rolled out across the Company.

In 2013, incremental production from implementing previously tested technologies exceeded 1.2 mmt.

 

Knowledge rollout

Setting up a system of continuous summarization and rollout of knowledge and best practices is the vital element of Rosneft Innovative Development Program.

In 2013, our activity in this area included the following:

· quarterly production of our corporate Nauchno-tehnichesky vestnik OAO NK Rosneft ("Rosneft Science Monitor");

· regular publication of articles authored by Company specialists, in leading Russian academic and technical editions;

· participation of Rosneft specialists in national and international conferences;

Our Company is implementing a Knowledge Management System (KMS, the iKnow information system). KMS is a necessary condition for the implementation of innovations and new technologies, enhancement of professional competences, allowing Company employees to share best practices, successful projects, lessons learnt, technical expertise, and laying grounds for professional enhancement and career growth via participation in Professional Communities.

Based on 2013 results, the Knowledge Management System is:

· 14 professional communities (67 experts, over 370 participants);

· 700+ documents uploaded to the iKnow Library;

· about 180 proposals and projects with lessons learnt;

· 1000+ unique users;

· 2000+ search queries.

 

International cooperation and foreign trade activities

Our Company's main strategic foreign trade vector within the Innovative Development Program is participation in international projects, programs and partnerships.

In 2013, Rosneft closed a deal with ExxonMobil establishing the Arctic Research Center (ARC). Pursuant to the work plan of strategic cooperation between Rosneft and ExxonMobil in the area of offshore exploration and development of the Russian Arctic, ARC will provide full service to Rosneft/ExxonMobil joint ventures in the areas of academic research and engineering development. Going forward, however, the focus will be on the Kara Sea projects. Initially, the Arctic Center will work in such areas as safety and environment; ice, weather and geological studies; ice monitoring; development of design criteria, assessment and formulation of field development concepts. The Arctic Center will make use of existing Rosneft and ExxonMobil developments to produce environmentally safe and more efficient technologies.

In 2013-2017, the Arctic Research Center plans to engage in the following activities:

· weather and ice studies, including building a database of accumulated data, development of marine facility design criteria, and creation of new technologies for studying environment and ice parameters, and iceberg drift monitoring;

· sea floor conditions, including building a database of accumulated data, development of marine facility design criteria, and creation of new technologies for studies and survey with a focus on underwater geotechnical drilling technology;

· environmental studies, including regional studies, studies and development of technologies in the area of emergency oil spill response, development of coastal area protection plans, as well as modeling and monitoring of arctic sea ecosystems;

· marine infrastructure conceptual design, in particular, designing a stationary gravitation platform, research and development in the area of natural gas production and transportation, designing underwater production and underwater pipeline systems, as well as designing floating craft for hydrocarbons exploration and production.

Under the Agreement for Strategic Cooperation in the Areas of Science, Technology and Joint Operating Projects between Rosneft and General Electric International, signed on June 21, 2013, the intention is to create a joint Research Center. It is intended that the joint center will engage in the following types of activity:

· gas monetization activities, oil refining and petrochemicals, marine and underwater development projects, enhanced oil recovery.

· research and experimental studies in the following areas:

- development of marine and underwater materials, processes and technologies, including, among other things, development of arctic materials and metallurgical processes, hydrodynamic calculations, development of safe arctic drilling processes, underwater/subglacial production and processing, underwater/subglacial power transmission and distribution;

- new gas and oil refining technologies, including, among other things, gas liquefaction technologies (GTL);

- development of new technologies, equipment for tight reserves production enhancement (unconventional oil, gas, heavy oil, etc. production processes);

- development of new polymers and polymer composite materials;

- development of new types of synthetic bio fuel for next generation aircraft.

 

Board of Directors and Management Remuneration

 

Board of Directors Remuneration

The Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies stipulates that members of the Board of Directors may be paid remuneration and/or compensation of their expenses associated with the performance of their functions during the period when they are in office. The Law also stipulates that the size and procedure for payment of such remuneration and compensation shall be established by a decision of the General Meeting of Shareholders.

 

Remuneration Criteria

Criteria for setting remuneration levels for members of the Board of Directors are established by the Regulation on the Procedure for Calculation and Payment of Remuneration and Compensation of Expenses to Members of the Board of Directors (Regulation).

In accordance with the Regulation, remuneration is paid to members of the Board of Directors who have the status of independent directors, to members of the Board of Directors who are authorized to represent the interests of the Russian Federation on the Board of Directors, except for members of the Board of Directors who have the status of public servants, and to the Sole Executive Body of Rosneft (President).

When setting the final amount of remuneration for directors' work in the reporting period, the following factors are taken into account:

- actual participation in the Board's work as Chairman and member of the Board of Directors;

- actual participation in Board Committee work as Committee Chairman and Committee member.

The Regulation stipulates the maximum level of remuneration for members of the Board of Directors for their work during the reporting period; upon recommendation by the Board of Directors, this level may be reduced, subject to the Company's financial situation.

The Board of Directors also makes recommendations as to whether remuneration will be paid in the form of cash or Company shares.

Rosneft compensates all expenses associated with the performance by Board members of their functions (accommodation, meals, travel, including VIP lounge services, and other payments and tariffs for air and/or rail transport services) as well as expenses incurred by a member of the Board of Directors in connection with a lawsuit brought by third parties (including expenses for court remedy, etc.), if the grounds for such a lawsuit were actions taken by a Board member in the interests of the Company. The Company also compensates expenses which may be incurred by a member of the Board of Directors in connection with administrative, criminal or other proceedings arising from his or her activities as a Board member.

Based on a recommendation of Rosneft's Board of Directors dated 30 April 27 2013 (Minutes No. 15 dated 2 May 2012), the General Meeting of Shareholders on 20 June 2013 resolved to approve remuneration for the following members of the Board of Directors for the period when they performed their duties by transferring to them the following amounts of Rosneft shares:

· Matthias Warnig - 76,373 shares (for the periods from 20 June 2012 to 30 November 2012 and from 30 November 2012 to 20 June 2013);

· Mikhail Kuzovlev - 76,373 shares (for the periods from 20 June 2012 to 30 November 2012 and from 30 November 2012 to 20 June 2013);

· Nikolay Laverov - 75,009 shares (for the periods from 20 June 2012 to 30 November 2012 and from 30 November 2012 to 20 June 2013);

· Alexander Nekipelov - 85,920 shares (for the periods from 20 June 2012 to 30 November 2012 and from 30 November 2012 to 20 June 2013);

· Hans-Joerg Rudloff - 79,101 shares (for the periods from 20 June 2012 to 30 November 2012 and from 30 November 2012 to 20 June 2013);

· Sergey Shishin - 79,101 shares (for the periods from 20 June 2012 to 30 November 2012 and from 30 November 2012 to 20 June 2013);

· Dmitriy Shugaev - 72,282 shares (for the periods from 20 June 2012 to 30 November 2012 and from 30 November 2012 по 20 June 2013);

· Iliya Shcherbovich - 72,282 shares (for the periods from 20 June 2012 to 30 November 2012 and from 30 November 2012 to 20 June 2013).

The AGM also approved payment of compensation for expenses incurred in connection with Board members' performance of their functions - specifically, expenses for accommodation, meals, travel (including VIP lounge services) and other payments and tariffs for air and/or railway transport services.

Remuneration to members of the Board of Directors in the form of Company shares helps to align the financial interests of directors with the long-term financial interests of the Company and its shareholders.

 

Rosneft Management Remuneration

Remuneration paid to senior management (president, first vice president, vice presidents and officers of equivalent rank) and to the heads of Rosneft's stand-alone subdivisions consists of a monthly salary and an annual bonus.

No additional remuneration is paid to Company managers for their work on Rosneft's governance bodies or its subsidiaries and affiliates (Rosneft's Management Board, boards of directors of subsidiaries).

The size of managers' monthly salary is stipulated in employment contracts entered into when managers are hired.

An annual bonus is paid to managers, subject to a decision by the Board of Directors based on the Company's performance in the reporting year. The bonus consists of two parts: one part relating to the manager's individual performance and the other part relating to team performance (by the relevant business and the Company as a whole). The annual bonus of the Company President is established subject to the achievement of individual performance indicators, which correspond to the key performance indicators of the Company.

Performance indicators are approved and their achievement is reviewed as follows:

§ performance indicators are developed on the basis of the Company's development strategy and its objectives in the reporting year;

§ team performance indicators and individual performance indicators for senior managers are approved by Rosneft's Board of Directors;

§ individual performance indicators for heads of standalone subdivisions are approved by Rosneft's Management Board;

§ upon completion of the reporting year, individual and team performance is measured by the appropriate subdivisions, using audited consolidated financial accounts and management accounts;

§ bonuses for senior managers are approved by Rosneft's Board of Directors, and bonuses for heads of standalone subdivisions are approved by the Management Board.

The structure of remuneration paid to Company management (ratio of fixed to variable parts) corresponds to generally accepted international practice.

A bonus may be paid to senior managers as well as to other employees for an outstanding contribution to Company development during the reporting period.

Share Capital

As of 31 December 2013, Rosneft's authorized charter capital equaled RUB105,981,778.17, divided into 10,598,177,817 ordinary registered uncertified shares at a par value of RUB0.01 each.

In accordance with the Charter, Rosneft has the right to place an additional 6,332,510,632 ordinary registered uncertified shares at a par value of RUB0.01 each and a total par value of RUB63,325,106.32 (authorized shares). These shares grant the same rights as outstanding ordinary shares of Rosneft. A decision to increase Rosneft's charter capital by placing additional authorized shares, not exceeding 25% of Rosneft's total outstanding shares, through open subscription is taken by the Board of Directors. In other instances, a decision is taken by the General Meeting of Shareholders.

The state registration number of Rosneft's issue of ordinary shares is 1‑02-00122‑А.

The date of state registration of Rosneft's issue of ordinary shares is 29 September 2005.

In 2013 there were no issues or placements of additional Rosneft shares.

The number of shareholders registered in the Rosneft shareholder register as of December 31, 2013 (without disclosure of information by nominee shareholders) was 30,267 (including 7 nominee shareholders). The number of nominee shareholders decreased by five year-on-year.

As of December 31, 2013, Rosneft had no preferred shares.

In 2007-2012 and until the closure of the deal for the acquisition of TNK-BP assets, the Russian Government owned a 75.16% stake in OJSC Rosneft Oil Company through OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ, which is 100% federally owned. The stake in OJSC Rosneft Oil Company owned directly by the Russian Government (represented by the Federal Agency for State Property Management) was 0.000000009%. The Russian Federation did not have a special right to participate in the management of Rosneft (a "golden share").

In March 2013, as part of the TNK-BP acquisition process, OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ sold a 5.66% stake in OJSC Rosneft Oil Company to BP plc. ("BP"). As of December 31, 2013, OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ owned a 69.50% stake in Rosneft.

Rosneft Shareholders Owning More than 1% of the Company's Share Capital

As of 31 December 2012

As of 31 December 2013

Shareholders

Number of shares

Stake in share capital, %

Number of shares

Stake in share capital, %

OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ*

 

7,965,816,383

 

 

 

75.16

 

 

 

7,365,816,383

 

 

 

69.50

 

 

 

National Settlement Depository Non-Bank Credit Institution and Closed Joint-Stock Company (nominee, Central Depository)**

 

0

 

0.00

 

3,179,709,451

 

30.00

RN-Razvitiye LLC

1,038,671,642

9.80

0

0.00

OJSC Sberbank of Russia (nominee)

1,079,159,409

10.18

0

0.00

Other legal entities owning less than 1% of shares

139,741,822

1.32

1,590,676

0.02

The Russian Federation, represented by the Federal Agency for State Property Management

1

Less than 0.01

1

Less than 0.01

Individuals

53,010,405

0.50

51,061,306

0.48

Shares on the balance sheet of Rosneft ***

321,778,155

3,04

0

0.00

TOTAL

10,598,177,817

100.00

10,598,177,817

100.00

 

* OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ is 100% federally owned. The stake in OJSC Rosneft Oil Company owned directly by the Russian Government (represented by the Federal Agency for State Property Management) is 0.000000009% (one share).

** The total number of nominee-held shares is 1,960,449,797 shares, which makes up a 18.50% stake in Rosneft's charter capital owned by BP Russian Investments Limited.In addition to these shares, BP International Limited, the sole shareholder of BP Russian Investments Limited, is the owner of 132,450,300 Global Depository Receipts (GDRs), certifying the rights of shares which make up 1.25% of Rosneft's charter capital. One GDR certifies the rights of one registered share of Rosneft.BP plc is the beneficiary and legitimate owner of all of BP International Limited's outstanding share capital. Therefore, BP plc has indirect control over BP Russian Investments Limited.

*** Shares purchased at the request of shareholders in 2012 in accordance with Articles 75 and 76 of the Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies.

During 2013, Rosneft updated information on its corporate Intranet site on a monthly basis concerning shareholders who own more than 1% of its charter capital. Rosneft management is not aware of any shareholders with equity stakes exceeding 1% (holders of Rosneft shares with equity stakes exceeding 1% of the total shares outstanding) other than those listed above.

Rosneft shares are traded on an organized securities market in Russia, CJSC MICEX Stock Exchange (B List). The rights of a shareholder (owner of ordinary shares), including the voting right of each voting share of Rosneft, are specified by Article 5.8 of the Company Charter.

Order No. 06-1380/pz-i of the Federal Financial Markets Service dated 20 June 2006 permits the placement and trading of 2,140,000,000 ordinary registered uncertified shares of Rosneft outside the Russian Federation.

In July 2006, Rosneft listed Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs) on the London Stock Exchange. The issue of GDRs, which certify rights in respect of Rosneft's ordinary registered shares in accordance with foreign law, was carried out by J. P. Morgan Europe Limited. One Global Depositary Receipt certifies the rights in respect of one ordinary registered share of Rosneft. As of December 31, 2013, GDRs had been issued for 937 mln ordinary shares of Rosneft, representing 8.8% of total shares outstanding.

The list of rights enjoyed by owners of Rosneft's ordinary shares is set out in clause 5.8 of the Company Charter posted on the Company website, www.rosneft.ru.

Information on the Ownership of Rosneft Shares by Members of the Board of Directors and Management Board

Members of the Board of Directors and Management Board

Number of ordinary shares (as of 31 December 2013)

Stake in share capital,

%

Matthias Warnig

92,633

0.0009

Andrey Votinov

204,590

0.0019

Robert Dudley

 -

-

Larisa Kalanda

2,060,978

0.0194

Yuriy Kalinin

159,580

0.0015

Didier Casimiro

324,590

0.0031

Andrey Kostin

111,876

0.0011

Nikolay Laverov

75,009

0.0007

Petr Lazarev

403,730

0.0038

Eric Maurice Liron

366,460

0.0035

Igor Maydannik

366,460

0.0035

John Mack

 -

-

Nayl Mukhitov

-

-

Alexander Nekipelov

85,920

0.0008

Igor Pavlov

267,165

0.0025

Zeljko Runje

244,310

0.0023

Igor Sechin

9,000,000

0.0849

Svyatoslav Slavinskiy

325,746

0.0031

Donald Humphreys

 -

-

Sergey Chemezov

-

-

Rashid Sharipov

4000

0.00004

Transactions with Rosneft Securities by Members of the Board of Directors and Management Board

The Company Regulation on Insider Information obliges members of the Board of Directors and Management Board and the President to disclose information on their transactions with Rosneft securities to the Company.

In 2013, members of Rosneft's Board of Directors and Management Board carried out transactions with Company securities. Details of such transactions were provided to the Company in compliance with the procedure and time limits stipulated by internal documents and were disclosed to the securities market in compliance with the applicable legislation.

Members of the Board of Directors and Management Board

Transaction date

Number of shares/GDRs bought or sold

Transaction type

Alexander Nekipelov

27 June 2013

 

28,944

 

Sale

Igor Sechin

21 August 2013

792,000

Purchase

28 August 2013

8,208,000

Larisa Kalanda

21 August 2013

525,000

Purchase

30 August 2013

285,020

Yuriy Kalinin

21 August 2013

13,000

Purchase

30 August 2013

146,580

Didier Casimiro

21 August 2013

121,000

Purchase

30 August 2013

203,590

Petr Lazarev

21 August 2013

170,000

Purchase

30 August 2013

122,155

Igor Pavlov

21 August 2013

104,000

Purchase

30 August 2013

162,870

Andrey Votinov

21 August 2013

1,000

Purchase

30 August 2013

203,590

Zeljko Runje

30 August 2013

244,310

Purchase

Igor Maydannik

30 August 2013

366,460

Purchase

 

Responsibility Statement

 

To the best of my knowledge, and in accordance with the applicable reporting principles, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of Rosneft. The management report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal opportunities and risks associated with the expected development of Rosneft.

 

Igor Sechin

President of OJSC Rosneft Oil Company

 

February 4, 2014

 

 

 

This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
 
END
 
 
FR SDLFESFLSEFL
Date   Source Headline
17th Oct 20223:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Listing Cancellation
15th Sep 20228:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: 1H 2022 IFRS Results
16th Aug 20225:15 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft informs about submission of a notification for automatic conversion of GDRs
1st Jul 20227:21 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Holds Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
30th Jun 20223:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Publishes Report on Payments to Governments for 2021
30th May 20228:01 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft’s Board of Directors Recommends Record-High Dividends for 2021
14th Mar 20221:15 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft's Board of Directors Approved Resumption of Share Acquisition Program
2nd Mar 20224:36 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
1st Mar 20224:41 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
1st Mar 20224:36 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
1st Mar 20222:30 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: PDMR Shareholding
24th Feb 20224:42 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
24th Feb 20224:37 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
11th Feb 20227:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating Results for 4Q and 12M 2021
11th Feb 20227:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial Results for 4Q and 12M 2021
4th Feb 202210:33 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and CNPC agreed to cooperate in the field of low carbon development
4th Feb 20229:16 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and CNPC strengthen oil supply cooperation
18th Jan 202212:40 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and SPIMEX sign an agreement on cooperation in the development of exchange trading in carbon units
28th Dec 202111:20 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft is the best Russian oil and gas company in the RAEX-Europe ESG rating
21st Dec 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Board of Directors Approves 'ROSNEFT-2030' Strategy
17th Dec 20214:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Director/PDMR Shareholding
15th Dec 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Upgraded its Position in S&P Global's International ESG Rating
13th Dec 20219:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft is among the Best Performing Oil and Gas Companies in CDP's International Climate Rating
12th Nov 20217:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial results for Q3 2021
12th Nov 20217:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating results for Q3 2021
11th Nov 20217:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Completion of Dividend Payment for H1 2021
14th Oct 20212:20 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Sale of 5% in Vostok Oil to a Consortium of Vitol and MME
1st Oct 20211:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: EGM Results
20th Sep 202112:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft became the only Russian O&G company announced as Global Compact LEAD
1st Sep 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Director/PDMR Shareholding
24th Aug 20217:48 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft BoD recommended first half of 2021 dividends at 18.03 rubles per share, representing 50% of the Company's IFRS net profit attributable to Rosneft shareholders
13th Aug 20218:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating results for 2Q and 1H 2021
13th Aug 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial results for 2Q 2021 and 1H 2021
15th Jul 20219:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Completion of Dividends Payment for 2020
30th Jun 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Report on Payments to Governments for 2020
10th Jun 202110:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Signes Heads of Terms for the Sale of a 5% stake in Vostok Oil
2nd Jun 20211:02 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: AGM Results
14th May 20218:01 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial Results for Q1 2021
14th May 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating Results for Q1 2021
30th Apr 202112:39 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Publishes Annual Report for 2020
23rd Apr 20217:45 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: BoD Approves AGM Agenda and Recommends Dividends for 2020
12th Mar 20212:05 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Nominees to the Board of Directors
12th Feb 202111:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operatings results for 4Q and 12M 2020
12th Feb 202111:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial results for 4Q 2020 and 12M 2020
5th Feb 202110:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Agreement Signed on Investment Incentives for Priobskoye Field
4th Feb 20219:38 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and BP Agree to Cooperate on Carbon Management and Sustainability
3rd Feb 202111:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Reconfirmed as a Constituent in the FTSE4Good Index Series Leading on Core Sustainability Metrics
4th Jan 20217:00 amRNSTransaction in Own Shares
29th Dec 20207:00 amRNSTransaction in Own Shares
29th Dec 20207:00 amRNSTransactions Completion

Due to London Stock Exchange licensing terms, we stipulate that you must be a private investor. We apologise for the inconvenience.

To access our Live RNS you must confirm you are a private investor by using the button below.

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

Quickpicks are a member only feature

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.