Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Why would he be talking to the police? It's a civil matter which they would have zero part in.
Even without the allegations... He is a self proclaimed Climate change denier and Donald Trump supporter.
But hey, if you want someone who is proud of the two above points to give you financial advice, then more power to you... Just don't inject any cleaning agents.
Uh oh guys, watch out or he will send you a million lawsuits in 4 seconds.
Jabberba, this isn't a school playground, I'm not on anyone's side but my own. Life is rarely black and white and just because two people agree on certain things doesn't mean they see eye to eye on everything else.
Just because I believe Bidstack will make me a lot of money in the next 5 years, doesn't mean I must agree with every ramping statement. I believe in making my opinion based on what I know, not rumours.
Please don't take this ad me being hostile, it's hard to portray tone over text. I just feel you should bunch your multiple posts into a single one in future and to avoid posting things you can not back up (e.g the rns release posts), the links you are posting are relevant and interesting, it's just that clutter of the multiple posting is annoying.
Jabberba coukd yoy chill out a bit please, the spam is getting a bit annoying.
I get you are excited about BIDS but please try to consolidate your posts together in future.
Also the constant posts stating there will definitely be an rns the next day are just as bad as the people saying there will be a funding tomorrow. We should rely on data that is known.
Fair enough Jilson, I thought you were referring to me.
Who knows at this point. It will be interesting to see the result of the lawsuits.
No Jilson, that isn't 'another one who didn't read'.
You accused me of not reading the article and I replied that I had and the reasons TW's proof is not reliable due to the fact that it could all be edited incredibly easily.
You just ignored the reply as it's true. (The ease of manipulation, not necessarily that it IS manipulated).
I like Admix, the work they do is very good. The only thing that concerns me with them is the focus on VR.
VR is still very early stages and could fade off as a passing fad if the industry doesn't play it right.
Many gamers want to love VR but are put off with the cost, space requirements and the technology involved. At the moment, we don't have the technology for a true VR experience (haptic gloves, comfortable light and cable free headset, real definition screen and a control system that isn't slightly janky) at a price point a non millionaire can afford.
Hopefully the industry digs deep into their pockets to progress VR even further (Valve joining with their kit and new game Half life Alyx is very good news). Until then, we are quite a while off from a truly significant audience reach in VR games.
I have read the article actually Jilson and the "proof" they show is not convincing to me. I could insert TW's name into that photos element in about 2 seconds, take a screenshot and say it's proof that TW did all this himself to cause a stir. This is baby tier investigation work being played off like Sherlock Holmes himself had a hand in it.
I'm not saying it's not true, because it could be, however in today's age of technology, evidence needs to be put forth in a standard that can not be easily manipulated.
The best thing TW could do is disprove any affiliation to the firm's that were mentioned in the original 'hit' article.
We will just have to agree to disagree on this.
You are right that TW doesn't need to publicly disprove the claims against him, however a narcissist like him DEFINITELY would shove it back in people's faces with absolute glee if he could... So it seems suspicious he hasn't proven it incorrect.
Also, why don't you hold JD to the same standard? You complained that JD didn't respond to your messages and you claim that as suspicious/deceitful....
You should be less hypocritical m80, it makes you look like a TW shill even more.
It's just a bit funny how the TW crew harp on about JD not responding to TW, but they are fine with TW not responding to pretty serious allegations which could result in jail time.
Rules for thee but not for me.
Indeed Jilson, let's hope the authorities ARE looking into users on this board.
More lies from Thechancers. It may have risen by 40% recently but it's still way down from where it was before he bought in.
How embarrassing :/
Indeed bay, it's obvious TW has bought followers on Twitter, you can tell with the like/retweet ratio.
But hey, if he wants to spunk his money up the wall to buy a fake echo chamber then I guess it's up to him.
There was no confusion Jilson, TW insinuated it was nefarious for his own financial gain.
It's nice that you worry about my family, probably due to the fact that your family wants nothing to do with you after the stunt you pulled in 2004. You know what I'm talking about.
At least you're not disputing that you are being paid by TW to disrupt this share. At least you're not that daft.
(I tried to copy your whole sentence there but I couldn't bring myself to make so many spelling and grammatical errors.)
That's a lot Thechancers, does TW pay you per word?
So Jilson, you say TW said it can't be independent if it was paid for by Bidstack... Yet they have shown it is independent even though they paid for it.
Please explain how this shows TW as 100% correct as I think your affiliation with him has messed your maths up.
Thechancers.... You really do look like a fool sometimes.
Yet again, LSE is crap so I'll post it below.
27 April 2020
Bidstack Group Plc
("Bidstack" or "the Company")
Further details re Lumen Research Study
Further to its announcement on 17 April 2020, Bidstack Group Plc (AIM: BIDS.L), the native in-game advertising group, announces further details of the research undertaken by attention specialists Lumen Research Limited ("Lumen Research") to measure the success of an in-game campaign delivered by Bidstack for an automotive brand.
It was commissioned and paid for by Bidstack and initiated on behalf of an automotive brand who wanted to better understand how the in-game adverts performed versus traditional advertising channels such as desktop display, out of home and mobile display.
Bidstack had previously commissioned Lumen Research (as announced on 24 June 2019) to undertake a study conducted across three video games on PC, mobile and console involving more than 500 gamers and more than 30 brands. Given this experience, Bidstack suggested to the automotive brand that Lumen Research would be an appropriate firm to undertake this work to benchmark Bidstack's technology against other channels and to better understand the brand uplift effects of in-game advertising.
Lumen Research (www.lumen-research.com) is an attention technology company that has developed eye-tracking technology to help companies understand how consumers interact with their products. Eye-tracking offers an accurate and objective measure of attention. Instead of asking questions about what people think they have seen, its software monitors what they actually look at. Lumen Research's clients include a number of FTSE-350 companies.
Bidstack worked with the automotive brand to agree the aims and objectives of the study and then asked Lumen Research to propose suitable methodology to undertake the research. Lumen Research ran the study independently with no further input from either Bidstack or the automotive brand and tested the ad in-game and in isolation.
Notwithstanding that the costs of the study were met by Bidstack, the findings from the study were collated and analysed objectively by Lumen Research and subsequently presented to the Company and the automotive brand.
Bidstack intends to share the findings of this study with other stakeholders by creating a forum for the in-game advertising industry to support the growth of in-game advertising as a recognised advertising category.
The Company looks forward to working with partners and competitors alike to share and enhance these findings.
-ENDS-