Member Info for Tiffin4T

Might be nice to talk about RR. at some point.

Just a thought, no slight against anyone intended.

Check out the old Braveheart Investments chat for continuity.

Perhaps there's not much on because the name and ticker just changed.

Leaving all that baggage and disappointment behind.

I seemed to have joined part way through a conversation/thread. Can anyone explain the link between LLOY and immigration legal or otherwise?

Since we're having a go at being topical rather than discussing RR., in one sense I'm, I live in the Speaker's constituency so don't have to spoil my vote.

Many thought Cameron was doing a fair job and had negotiated a passable way to avoid the disruption of BREXIT, (I've never been a fan of shuffling the chairs on the Titanic). We need productivity improvements, to retain ownership and benefit from what we do create and the generally focus on what matters rather than looney tune sound bites.

The Conservatives have done pretty much everything they could to say "hey, look at this omnishambles, low talent, entitled gravy train, what do we have to do to be completely unelectable? Boris, Truss, etc.

But, is there an alternative? Labour by foundation, intention, custom and practice and instinct will destroy wealth by jealousy based targeting of taxes and by deepening financial apartheid.

The rest? I think the Libdems are the only ones you count as potentially sane and not single issue or trouble makers.

I have never been a supporter of wealth redistribution in the sense of the government getting its hand in the pockets of those who create wealth to give to those who don't (yes, yes, I know far too general and there are some valid reasons for some fellow member of society to need communal help). Perhaps if politicians came to understand poverty as being in receipt of targeted or means tested benefits they would change their approach to 'solving' poverty?

Crystallising loses to offset against gains elsewhere - year end in a week or so???

Well now, given that Labour created ISAs out of PEPs, the thought that Labour will actually think about let alone tax dividends or capital gains in ISAs would be conclusive evidence that they are fundamentally unelectable, ever.

Now that's the really scary thought when you look at the present lot.

Thanks, thought I was probably missing something.

My first post, so here goes. And the first point is that the hold I have rated these as is what I want to question.

I have some EPIC, bit disappointed management have thrown the towel in, but I have a question. Most valuations still seem to say about 80p per share NAV. Share price in the market is 68.8 today.

Does that mean the payout 'by the end of the year' will be about 80p per share less any dividends paid between now and then and any expenses that can be rounded up and charged to shareholders, or is the 68.8p likely to be the maximum?