Member Info for Thorpedo

Seadoc

They are now available for you to scrutinise. I cant wait to so if your analysis of them and the information, some of which is now over 25 months old.

Thanks got it.

It was always obvious that he was trading . Nothing wrong with it but he shouldnt call out others when they do.

MRPlumper
Did you get a screenshot of FOTH post as it isnt showing on his twitter feed.

He did have a screenshot of your post below, with an added comment but that seems to have been deleted.

Ewqwe1234
I think you do not understand the basis of investments and of AIM.

It is about future prospects not current position.

If you think that the Mcap should be based on its current position then it should be £Nil as it is currently making losses. But on that basis so should Fitbit before it was bought out and so should Tesla right now. I am not trying to say that UKOG are currently comparable but just showing your complete naivety.

BTW UKOG isnt producing 300bopd it is currently in an extended well test of a vertical well and a horizontal well. It also has planning permission for more wells.

Ewqwe1234
Based on what, you have been short before - got it wrong. long before - got it wrong. Now short again.

You are plucking figures out of thin air, you have no basis for your constant deramps or none that you post.

You have no credibility on this BB so why bother except to bore us investors.

Hex
The maximum amount it has flowed has a decline rate by MINUS 73 from 362 to 435.

Also the maximum sustained rate has a negative decline (aka increased) to 298.

Penguins
You state "Flowed possibly up to about 400bbls from HH-1 Portland . . . .Stable rate 293bopd for 24 hours (where's the 362bopd?). Although was the 435bopd an initial rate of the 6 hour test or an average over the whole 6 hours?"

I dont know where you get your possibly up to 400bbs from nor how you can think 435bopd is the initial rate of the 6 hours test and not for the 6 hours test the RNS clearly states "at an initial rate of 435 barrels of oil per day ("bopd") over a 6-hour period."

Also you refer to the previous 362bopd this was an initial rate so 435 is a significant improvement. It cannot be compared to the newly RNS stable rate of 293bopd which again is the highest stable rate recorded.

FrankieAbbott
Most people are honest. If they are your true thoughts then it doesnt say much about your morals.

Pboo
I am not trying to discredit you. I said that I thought that you shouldnt have posted an old photo. I took it as naive.

Others since have said that you have done it before and misled.

Others since have said that you have traded UKOG

Pboo
I was responding to wizard125 about my opinion on a matter which this board has been discussing.

If you hadnt have posted an old photo in response to new news it would have saved a lot of hassle and it would have also stopped you being called out as a trader.

wizard125
No its a new one and thanks to Adrian for providing it.

I still think that Pboo shouldnt have posted an old picture on new news and by thinking that doesnt make me a troll no does it stop me being a genuine long term holder.

Pboo
I do know what it means, but the main part of the tweet was the picture and the wording is a minor part. I dont see what value an old picture added except for it to be potentially misinterpreted as a current picture.

I have thanked you and Adrian for your work previously and do so again now.

hope9
Neither I nor Stocktaker01 said that we didnt believe @Adrianfire nor did we say we didnt appreciate his work.

I said that the posting of an old photo by PBoo could be misleading.

Mullins58
That is an old picture and whilst it does say on the tweet it can only be done to mislead.

Alfiemol
Being new meant that you didnt know, now you do.

What annoys me is when people have been around a while and say a sea of blue (or red) to suggest that there are only buys (or sells) going through. Trying to manipulate the SP when they know their statement is misleading.

Best to look at trades either side to work out if it is a buy or sell. Not an exact science but you can get a reasonable idea

Alfiemol
As you are new with 36 posts.
The buy/sell is computer generated buy if above the midpoint and sell if below the midpoint.

Looking at 2 trades at 11:13 one for 0.849 and one for 0.8251 both classified as buys because they are above the midpoint when in fact the 0.8251 would have been a sell.

I originally came in via the hype of BB, betting for a bit of fun on IG. Made a bit, peanuts, remember going in to a meeting being £1,000 up only for it to be £300 by the time I came out.

Since then I have researched and invested.

What I dont understand is that UKOG is valued on (this statement doesnt read well on read back) its current production capacity, there is no hope value. UKOG is producing from Kimmeridge, it has plenty of Kimmeridge assets why arent they included in the SP (at a discount).

Companies should be valued on their potential future earnings (risk factored in) not on their current earnings. People are quoting that 1,000bpd from HH2z is worth £x. If this proves viable then surely the SP should include future wells.

Potential future could be worth 10s of pences is it worth that now, definitely not but is the risk reward price worth more than the current SP. In my opinion yes.

If Tellurian held 132,322,260 shares as at 31/12/19 prior to the issue of 331,125,828 then they must still hold some of the 132m because volume hasnt even been 132m since then, I presume they now hold 463m, 6.33%.

There is no TR1 RNS re Tellurian 3% holding so they must have pre sold at least a third of them prior to issue. YA seem to be playing sensible with their conversions to.

Just waiting for work to restart in the New Year (which for most of us isnt until Monday) and then the CPR.

Qwerty
SS's remuneration package should be looked at by the shareholders as it is their money what is been spent. I as a shareholder am happy with SS's salary and the fact that more than half of his remuneration package is paid via share based payments.

If, as a shareholder, you are unhappy with his remuneration package then I suggest you go to the next agm and raise it there.