Member Info for SwearinNige

Milcait. That would be great.

I see this rns as a positive thing for the near and long term of the company. A proven track record is never a bad thing. Lets look at phe in a years time and pribabky be kicking ourselves that we didn't buy more at these prices. This will rocket on the news we hope for in the not too distant future. Wish i had more funds available.

6 secs apart and both showing as sells. Urm!!

Brooko i can not dispute the figures. Great post and true

Great post t m. I at work today so just catching up on my lunch break

Can' see any new mail!!! Please re send. Not in junk either

TM, One downside to that transit. Its weight, in the UK you need a 7.5 tonne driving license which nowadays doesn't come when you pass your car test. its circa 4500 kg. 10230lbs, and I bet it handles like a dog.

Diesel has no future. Just this week I had to park in London Borough of Islington and was charged an additional �2 per hour because the van is diesel powered. Not be long before other local councils jump on this to increase revenues, thus meaning people are forced away from diesel. Petrol is not a viable option for commercial vehicles. I had a petrol, 2 litre transit back in the 90s and it did 15 to the gallon at best. Electric doesn't give us the range required, so hydrogen it has to be, possibly hybrid with electric as in formula 1, Similar to the Toyota Prius but with hydrogen fuel cell, and battery. We all know typically hydrogen is expensive to produce, but with our system it isn't and gets rid of the plastic waste, tyres etc, with zero emissions. That's 3 big ticks for the future. Lets see what develops with Paul now doing more in depth work with the company over the next few weeks/months and let us await that RNS stating commercial contracts signed. I am not looking at this with rose tinted glasses, I know the risk is high but the rewards here are tremendous if / when this pays off. Best of luck all

Thanks locker, just lets sit back and wait. the news will come, maybe like buses, none for a while and 2 at once

Could someone confirm that our application was in block 13? I seem to recall it was. If so no further assessment is required. Further assessment applies to 16/3e, 15/19 and 16/16. See page 22 (25 of PDF)of the document below https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/681628/30th_Round_Draft_AA_-_Central_North_Sea_Blocks.pdf Maybe I am off track here a little so am open to criticism, but I believe I am correct. Please advise if it's not block 13, and not feed me to the lions!!!

Milcait, I have sat and read for 2 hours the link you posted and the many links it offers to no avail. However I just remembered seeing something on our own website stating dates. Page 11 of the link below states that results are to be announced 31st March, so maybe there is a little delay due to further assessments being made, or alternatively just a delay with OGA. I have searched for results of 30th round and every site I have found simply says, "Pending" https://i3.energy/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/20171108-i3-Corporate-Presentation.pdf Day off from work today so I will make this my homework for the day, and hopefully post something with substance later rather than ear say.

Managed a top up at 73

84 quoted

TM An interesting read. I also PM you

Pomander, I am not looking for an argument, I would firstly like to say you are correct, it would take lots of cash to create the plants. This could be backed by some big players. One I can think of is the UK Government. So are you saying that erecting wind turbines off shore is more cost effective? If you are you are sadly mistaken. On my statement about lithium ion batteries check out the link below to show what happens when the battery is short circuited. That is one of the reasons your not allowed them over 3.2Ah on commercial planes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLc74Qpvweg Also if I believe I am invested in a dead duck I always sell my holding and move on as typically your losses will increase over time. GLA

What the manufacturers don't tell you either is that you are driving around in a time bomb. The batteries used are lithium ion, and upon being damaged in the event of an accident they will ignite instantly and the toxic fumes will kill you if the fire that rages doesn't. Also another key point is the UK has a not so good climate for 5 months per year(take a look out of the window,it's snowing where I am) so you need to put the heating on to clear the ice from the screen and driver/passenger comfort. This drains the batteries at an alarming rate thus reducing the range drastically. Remarkably the battery temperature can reach dangerous levels in UK winter months when driven hard with heater on. Another negative we all know is that a battery when discharged and charged several 100 times the performance starts to drop off (Just look at your phone when new compared to 2 years old), Another negative, is where are we going to dispose of all these lithium ion batteries? Many people also believe they are driving a carbon emission free vehicle, technically they are when they are driving it but when it's parked and on charge it is not carbon neutral. And now for a positive, the only one I can think of, free road tax, and that will not be sustainable as the government needs the revenue to fund HS2 and other stupidly priced projects it embarks on

Thanks telephoneman. Anything constructed offshore carries huge financial investment to install, and connect to the grid. Maintenance is another huge financial burden. Proof of this as been around for many years in the oil & gas industry, uplift costs onshore $3 - $10 per barrel typically, whilst off shore typically $20- $30. What as attracted me to PHE was the plastic problem that keeps making national news, and china no longer taking waste plastic from the UK, but we are now diverting it to Vietnam. To answer your question 1.3 MW is a huge amount, far more financially viable than off shore wind farms, but I believe the key to getting this right is the location of sites, for connectivity purposes, which is where a little history can help a lot. The location of sites could include but are not limited to, former steel work sites, former mining sites etc as both have a good local infrastructure as historically they used a lot of electricity meaning large cables are already in place to facilitate the sale of electricity. The hydrogen can also be stored because these sites are usually very large. With wind farms, this may sound crazy, but there are 2 problems that arise, 1 being that we have days with no wind, and unbelievably but true is we have days that are too windy for them to operate efficeintly and safely. DMG provides the solution and it's not only companies that should be looking at this but governments worldwide. Just a note that I have only invested a small amount here for now using up my ISA entitlement before the financial year end, and this is the first time for many years that I have taken such a risk with a share. If this gets rolled out as some suggest then I for one am unable to calculate the MCap of this company. Electricity / Hydrogen from a problematic waste has to be win win situation for PHE. I just wonder if the government will scrap the 5 pence plastic carrier bag tax? Below are 4 more negatives for wind farms that are all costly at planning stages. bird and fish populations electromagnetic radar interference shipping and flight navigation impact on the landscape Oh well it will soon be the 6th April where we all get another �20k allowance. I am sure many of you know over on facebook there is a guy called Paul Warwick who is doing some PR work for PHE and he posts on several foums, Aim share chat, 10 baggers UK etc. He also has a huge holding which is good to see and his enthusiasm shines brightly. Sorry about my previous post, please substitute the word "millions" with "billions"

Of the 11 holdings I currently have this is the only 1 I can speak about with a professional opinion given my background as an electrical engineer. Hydrogen is without doubt the best solution. Interesting to see below many are pointing out facts about weight, range & charging facilities. They are all valid points. The national grid in the UK needs millions of �s in upgrades due to the amount of people living here. The grid was designed to facilitate 60 million people. A few years ago the grid was almost at its limit and the introduction of LED lighting as helped bring the mega watt hours down.( A huge relief for the government ) Your energy suppliers sent out free low energy lamps and offered insulation to properties free of charge. This was done as a cheap fix to bring the demand down. The truth of the matter is we can not all have all electric cars / trucks/buses as we can not charge them. The chargers typically vary from 20 to 32 amp for a car and 63 amp for a fork truck. The national grid can not supply this to all of us plus our other daily use.

would someone sell 100 shares for 48 pence? Manipulation of price maybe. But doesn't look like it worked MM as no one else has bailed out

So quiet on this board I think all of the regular posters on here must have taken an early Easter break. Talking of holiday mode, funding news before spring bank holiday will do us all well. I will be holding this for as long as it takes and am considering more top ups if the price drops back due to the impatient selling. Happy early holidays i3e holders.