Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Re the toxicology results timeline response...Q1 imo is too vague for a response, regarding initial responses show positive reasoning to go forward with CTA. We are advised shareholders interests are a priority. When I was responsible for various public to government military contracts we had dates set for product/service delivery and penalties if they failed to meet them. Q1 is too vague!
Yes I appreciate we are in a 'pandemic' and results have been hampered by this....and we have gone from end of 2021 to Q1 2022.
I'm of a definite opinion the results are being 'stalled' for this and that whilst PH are silent.
How is that beneficial for us shareholders employing a newly appointed joint broker who are supposed to benefit us.
Not going to bang on but when third parties employed by a listed company on behalf of investors money do not respond accordingly with relevant findings they will be dealt with ( if we press the button) a Norwich Pharmacal Order!
And to add GeeJay from 16th December RNS
The results received to date fully support our plan to submit this CTA for SDC-1801.
Hi Celtic. this from 16th December RNS....
We are pleased to report that the final toxicology and safety studies required to file for an exploratory Clinical Trial Authorisation ("CTA") have been completed and we expect the finalised reports in the first quarter of 2022. The data from these studies will be crucial to the progression of this CTA, which we remain on track to submit during mid-2022. While data analysis is still in progress, we are confident that the studies have met their objectives of identifying any organs or tissues that might be susceptible to high-dose toxicity and determining the appropriate first-in-human dose. The results received to date fully support our plan to submit this CTA for SDC-1801.
And more money backs us going forward....we are being held back on sp! FACT!
The spread has been noteable to cause due consideration to new private investors but I'm pretty sure the lths are sat happy and probably causing a headache to PH.
Hold the line. ;-)
Fair shout Mafuta. And also a happy new year to you.
The thing I'm pondering on is the tox results are overdue and if a consolidation as seems to be a noteable discussion point here...well how in a month of Sundays could a consolidation go forward without tox results being released prior?
Surely us investors are privy to the results following support of sareum.
Just imagine the uproar!
Some interesting posts today...almost a psychological nudge technique to make investors and potential new investors believe we are up against a wall and should accept what we are told we are worth. Rather than some very well researched valuations!
Ps I'm talking about you RMM! Your posts are respected. And don't forget the Q and A at the very beginning when the potential values of our ipr were discussed and pointed out by our main man. Hundreds of billions!
The world of the rich, quite rich and very rich etc etc has multiple clubs that they are subscribed into if they pass vetting. I find it quite interesting that we have multiple HNWIs that have subscribed to allow Sareum to see forward movement of our ip.
It should also be noted that the last raise included new and existing HNWIs TOGETHER!!!
Here is a sampler from Bloomberg re how they operate
One perk of many wealth networks is access to deal flow. R360’s members can propose investment opportunities to the rest of the group, but each deal first goes to a four-person committee, which runs it through a process looking at 100 different factors, Garcia said. Then an outside firm, Conway Investment Research, conducts operational and financial due diligence. After that, the member proposing the deal can host a call.
I appreciate some said 5p is the sp for certain reasons but look at the sp movement when #1 arrived. We are definitely being held back. That last subscription taking us to plus £6m would have seen a sp increase due to investors confidence...and yes talk of timelines ....so that can be a down point....but come on we have a position with a library of ip etc etc
Tell me why you think this AIM company is only valued at a mc of 160m ...we are locked and loaded.
Hi HBD also it's a bit telling from the last subscription that it is some of the preexisting HNWIs and new (still can't work out if it is a single newbie or more than one newbie joining ) subscriber/s are adding more funds together as a group to show solidarity for sareums ipr and that in order to book Labs and tests we need to have funds in hand.....possibly......the extract is below
Cambridge, UK, 17 December 2021 - Sareum Holdings plc (AIM: SAR), the specialist small molecule drug development company, announces that it has raised approximately £1.63 million, before expenses, through a subscription by new and existing high net worth individuals
I think imo that an offer a licence could come at anytime...its whether or not we think its enough given we have funds and not easy prey....let the bidding commence when the full tox results are in....
SOG. Looking good in my opinion.
Maybe one day we catch up for a pint and pie.
It would be a pleasure.
Let the fireworks begin....when we are allowed.
Good evening SOG and a happy new year to you too. Greatly enjoy your posts and your demeanour. I hope I behave this year and don't bite at the baiters like I do.
Anyhow....re sareum most of us are aware of our ipr, investors cumulative investment, 2 drugs for the price of one ...and the one I still keep thinking about due to my tin hat (critical thinking aka) re flt3 (links to 737 i posted re AZ not long ago) which I intimated in my last post and its potential and fk what do I know but this from sareum website this evening...
Discovery platform
Sareum’s SKIL® (Sareum Kinase Inhibitor Library) discovery platform is based on a chemical template which can be adapted to inhibit many different kinases. SKIL compounds demonstrate high potency with good selectivity. Lead compounds have been developed that are suitable for i.v. or oral administration.
The intellectual property surrounding the SKIL chemical template, specific examples and their uses is protected by granted and pending patents.
The SKIL platform has generated compounds for Sareum's Aurora+FLT3, ALK and VEGFR-3 kinase cancer programmes and its TYK2 and FLT3 auto-immune disease programmes.
We routinely screen SKIL compounds to discover leads against new kinase targets. Due to our strong IP position, these leads have very low exposure to competitors' "submarine" patents (patents that have been filed but not yet published).
I'm not even going to discuss DNA repair .....
I'm so happy I'm invested here and to the great posters here ..yourself thoth citizen hbd and the rest of you. I can't name you all as the missus is watching A time to die ....again!
If you haven't seen it ...appreciate a cost...but I think you might watch with reflective consideration.
Regards Steadydanny
Fwiw I'm still awaiting for an expose by Peel Hunt re our primary ipr advancement (including investment) and then with 1802 that can follow in quicktime due to similarity...not forgetting the tweets from Dr Parker that indicated initial positive tox results and their impending full release.
And then secondary investment in the ongoing news flow re 737 and SC tie up with AZ and AZ links to our ipr that spent a bit of time in China.
Surely as a secondary advised corporate broker and the silence from them is a bit deafening given the sp since we took them on?
Also are Hybridan on mute? They did do a cracking report earlier last year that seemed to get buried.
Anyways its an interesting world we are living in, not one if I did a cost benefit analysis on would see me undertake the same path as some government's have undertaken given risk and economic effect. But hey ho.We hold some serious cards at the table.
Our board need to tell PH to do an expose of our wares and progress and potential imo.
You are turning this as against bods. What specifically do you like here? So you are content that the introduction of Peel Hunt has been worthwhile at shareholders expense and subscriptions holders adding investments? Please tell me what you find significant here which is why many are invested for. Such as myself. Ps how long until ph void your account?
Jed you know nothing about the ipr here. Just bluster. Stfu.
Keep posting jed. And the acolytes who follow you. All screen shot. Ready to repost when necessary.
Jed as per your response
So please, all the windgers and gripers out there go and play with your kid's new scalextrics and leave the share dealing to the grown ups.
Can you officially say you have no direct contact with ph. Secondly what part of the science at sareum makes you triggered to respond to my comments?
Jed. What is factually wrong in what I said?
Seriously nothing from Peel Hunt. Regarding new patent applications and ongoing 737 news. And let's not forget the submarine patent!
What taf are they here for? If a vote cometh forward to support Sareum in a consolidation without tox news that is overdue and PH advising at our cost as a corporate broker that to the potential individual investor that nothing has happened here since they got involved....well I call foul play.
Peel Hunt are our effectively employee!!!!
They work for us! !! What taf have they done?
Sfa!
Peel Hunt are a concern imo
Understanding Brokerage Companies
In a perfect market, where everybody had full information and could act quickly and correctly on that information, there would be no need for brokerage firms. In reality, however, there is less than perfect information, opacity, and asymmetric knowledge. As a result, buyers don't always know who the sellers are and which is offering the best price. Likewise, sellers are in the same position. Brokerage companies exist to help their clients match the other side of a trade, bringing together buyers and sellers at the best price possible for each, and extracting a commission for their services.
The BOD need to advise properly why PH have been introduced. Wtf have they added beneficially here? Hybridan keeping quiet.
Some we are paying them for .......sfa apart from no news and price drop.....
The board needs to respond pronto!!!
SAN MATEO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Sierra Oncology, Inc. (SRRA), a late-stage biopharmaceutical company on a mission to deliver targeted therapies that treat rare forms of cancer, granted stock options to six new employees as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, under Sierra Oncology’s 2018 Equity Inducement Plan. The 2018 Equity Inducement Plan is used exclusively for the grant of equity awards to individuals as an inducement material to such individuals entering into employment with Sierra, pursuant to Rule 5635(c)(4) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
Interesting read re the rule. As also our RNS 3rd November. And the individuals that are aparty re sareum research of the submarine patent.
Tin hat firmly on. Employees ...not stated as full time.
Something is happening
Fair shout PCS. Who knows anyone here? Who knows who via other mediums that are selective here who have private chats? Who knows why we have paid for a new recently appointed well known corporate broker? Maybe the board were bored with the private recent investments and just thought ...hey let's just bring on a new corporate broker after new subscriptions and just discuss what sandwiches we have at the next meeting. The money has gone to research labs! Note the submarine patent scientists named!
Maybe I say it in a conflicting way when I post which has both positive and negative conatations.
But I still post relevance with the ipr and its history and make assumptions on their possible future. I refer to RNSs as they are like a watermark on the corporate responses that are legally accountable. Thus they are very particular.
Imo watch the 737 gain MOMOentum and somehow ALT3 has a bit part. Oh and AZ were involved...But 1801 with its unique opportunities has a twin in 1802 but tweaked so multiple licences available. Which we were advised by the board would follow in quickstep as very similar. So it's like interested parties actually partake in joint research.
Appreciate I'm a self made pariah here. My fault. But wish you well.
Pcs but what fundamentals do you specifically like and the possible interaction.
Will you atleast answer one question or just continue to prove you are actually not invested here without backhanded payments to disrupt.
What is your reason of iprs that intrigue you given your 'investment' ? Simple question.