The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
On the Dynasty website there are several job vacancies.
One in particular stood out for me - "Publisher Engagement Manager" because of this line in the job description - "The role will be responsible for delivering strategic partnership agreements with the top 10 publishers over the next 24 months. . . . "
It goes on to say - "These would include:
• The ability for Dynasty to provide billing directly with the publishers to our partners.
• The ability to connect to APIs allowing integration at a game level for tournaments.
• New game releases
• Game promotions and tournaments
• Customized game offerings: avatars, weapons, etc..
• Sponsorship and advertising
. . . .When it says Top Ten Publishers, how do people interpret that ?
Crypto's at the end of the day, (just like any hard currency) are surely just a derivative of the production and assets that they ultimately represent (whether digital or physical). Saying that Crypto's should be hit to sanction the Russians even more seems to me like a very broad brush approach in much the same way as saying diamond or gold trades should be restricted.
My logic is that whilst (using a physical example) a diamond intrinsically has the same value in Russia as anywhere else, if Russia as a country has it's supplies of imports severely restricted, trading diamonds domestically would become more likely, and for an ever reducing quantity and quality of goods and services because of import restrictions.
So the ability to send crypto overseas is about as useful to the Russians in this scenario as sending Diamonds abroad for payment. . . . .payment for what exactly if nothing is permitted into the country ?
And as the rouble has plummeted to such an extreme degree, whatever they attempt to exchange it for electronically (whether that's using Travelex, PayPal, a bank, or a crypto exchange, . . . .the damage has already been done. So surely a blanket restriction on any other kind of currency makes little difference to the Russians now. Even if they had access to the foreign exchange markets properly, many parts of the world are refusing to trade with them anyway.
So unless I'm missing something obvious there's not too much to be concerned about.
None of this changes the technological breakthroughs and developments that the De-Fi movement offer (along with SatoshiPay and Pendulum) as far as I can tell anyway.
Surely very very good news
I've a feeling those multi baggers will be positions initiated at a much higher market cap than Alien.
Looking at the MESF website it appears people can host there own tournaments - I know nothing about this. Does that mean they can use any game or do they need permission off the game publisher ?
The League of Legends in game purchase element perhaps seems to be the more intriguing aspect ?
I don't know if this is purely for illustrative purposes or not and what monetary value can be placed on these, but on Dynasty's website are pictures clearly depicting tournaments and in game purchases for some very popular games including Valorant, PUBG, Fortnight, Call of Duty, and League of Legends.
The first 4 games I mentioned are shown as if a screenshot from MESF (Malaysian Electronics Sports Federation) of which Dynasty signed a 5 year deal with in June 2020. One of the main proposals of the MESF was to bring e-sports tournaments into one platform. If that screen grab is true and if it's anything to go by it could well be on the way to achieving that goal ?
League Of Legends is shown further down Dynasty's web site with what looks like an in game purchase of ammunition for the game.
I don't play games and don't know what significance any of this has in truth.
Just pointing out my observation - one that's clearly hidden in plain sight if relevant to Blue Star.
Interesting Excerpt here from a press release dating back from May 2021 on the Lucyd Corporate site, talking about the then recently employed sales director Kenneth Strominger . . . . While President of the Nexus Sports consultancy, he negotiated many successful deals, including the creation of Iron Man-licensed products for the Yurbuds headphone line, and garnering placement into the national Dick’s Sporting Goods chain. Founded in 2008, Yurbuds developed in-the-ear and behind-the-ear headphones that are ergonomically and functionally designed specifically for athletes. Yurbuds headphones were available in 19,000 points of sale, including big box general merchandise retailers, sporting goods retailers and more than 750 active lifestyle specialty retailers. The company was acquired by Harmon in 2014". https://www.lucyd.co/blogs/news/press-release-team-expansion
Reverse image search the people supposedly involved in trademeplus
Does anybody have any idea whether SatoshiPay could be involved in this in any way ? Not ramping btw, . . Genuine question. It's all so complicated to work out U.Today: Stellar Releases 2022 Roadmap to Expand DeFi Through MoneyGram with Smart Contracts.
https://u.today/stellar-releases-2022-roadmap-to-expand-defi-through-moneygram-with-smart-contracts
Very much appreciate the thought out response. I will have read at your previous posts too. Thanks very much.
Steve Byle CEO of Valkor https://www.linkedin.com/in/steven-byle
I usually don't like mining companies such as the vast amount of risks. I have noticed the share price for this company over the past few years has remained relatively stable for an AIM company in this sector. I'm also encouraged by Harvest Minerals which has carried out many of it promises.
However I would like some other investors honest opinions about the production start date and chance of success. I have a small punt here but for me is still material. It isn't often I see AIM mining companies at this stage in progress and just hoping it isn't all hope & optimism.
Also can anyone have a stab in the dark about the impact on the share price and market cap once (if) production is started and what barriers are still there (I'm not an expert in mining companies).
Just watched YouTube video on Harvest Minerals and although Brian McMaster has stuck to his word, I notice the market cap is still very low 7-8 million and Brian did state he thinks that is very under cooked.
Thanks in advance.
In the presentation it's explained that a lot more money was spent on stocking up on inventory to prevent supply issues due to problems associated with Coronavirus. If I understood the presentation correctly It's also mentioned that due to accounting procedures the Christmas trading period isn't included in the figures.l, but what is alluded to is that January has so far been the business January since inception of the company.
it was explained in the presentation that investment has to be made to sustain profitability over the long term.
Approximately 9 minutes in reduced cash is partly attributed to increased stock levels to mitigate temporary volatility of supply issues.
Approximately 12 minutes in, 95% of deliveries now are on time within 10 days, an improvement over competitors who often have an 8-10 week lead time
Approximately 35 minutes in share price absolutely does not reflect value of company in the directors opinion.
Some other notable points are that share price volatility can be attributed to the swing towards retail vs institution investors, growth has occurred even though many stores that sell or market their products have been closed for long periods. Also there is an increased emphasis on more sophisticated e-commerce tools including involvement of Shopify & Zalando . . . . a data director employed previously from John Lewis is on board too.
Also mentioned were various potential licensing deals (undisclosed) for many of the sleep wellness products.
And sustainable profit being the target rather than a reduction in advertising causing a sudden spike in profit but proving to be unsustainable.
In other words, in my opinion . . . .a lot going on with this company and a lot to be positive about.
So, given Bell currently has a market cap of circa 150 million and Tek own 15% of it, . . . that values Tek's stake at around 22 million. As Tek's market cap is 48 million, the market is therefore only valuing the other 3 companies combined - Salarius (& Microsalt), Lucyd (& Innovative Eyewear), and Guident at a combined value of 25-26 million - or on an equally shared basis around 8-9 million each.
Am I missing something ?
Bluestar holds just under 6% of guild so should have a little impact at least ? Plus the sponsorship deal seems like a good sign for the e-sports sector that Bluestar has a chunky stake in imo
https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/GILD/subway-signs-multi-million-pound-sponsorship-7v7i6amrat2q8eq.html
I just bought in today. Late to the party sounds like a huge understatement given the massive rise so far, but feel it's impossible to value the future market value of KR1's portfolio. I have this position now as an add on to my existing portfolio and didn't want to use an unregulated crypto exchange to buy coins, and impressed by their portfolio. I've been late getting my head around this concept. See what happens.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1100654/napster-subscription-revenue-worldwide/