Member Info for scallywag3

YA will have little effect, once the new well is given up 2,500 Bod That will put the SP to 9.25p A lot less shares for YA at that price.
Do your own maths, The above is purely my own given all the information known to date. ( As long as it wasn't supplied by Angs. )

They don't have the shares yet, so if it is them, theyre shorting. I know! theyre not allowed to. you think they care . When, if they can bring the SP crashing they could own 50% of the company in a few weeks time.

I'm off to Croatia tomorrow for a few weeks. going to leave this alone.
give you peeps a rest.
good luck.

You mean like Brockham was.

All I can do with Angus having so much in it, is sit and wait, Iv'e already written off what I've invested, shares put away for a rainy day. might need them to light the fire. but there is still a small chance of recovery.

As we sit and wait with no income the NPV will go down. No income but plenty outgoings.

Joint Venture, Doesn't cost money. That's good. :)

Another project ! and the money from where to take it on ? ( the P.I's no doubt ) The Big " D" comes to mind. best just deal with what we have .
I disagree with the SP increase as time diminishes towards Salt. Angus have such a poor reputation that only actual production ( from any asset) will raise the SP.
atb

The speed at which Angus are moving with Balcombe is almost set in stone. Nothing Angus can do but go with the flow.
that being the case with nothing other in the pipeline but Salt late next year the SP has more chance of going down than up.
However, I firmly believe that Balcombe when it does come on line early next year will give us an SP around 7p - 10 p
So I'm holding
For more exciting times in the weald Iv'e invested in UKOG for just now they have far more going for them than Angus.
gla.

This study proves what we already knew. Swampys have a Low IQ.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-50015982

Good day to you betterupthandown, I'd have loved to have gone to the meeting, travelling 1,000 miles for it " No.
I'm very pleased with what he said in the interview, especially as he comes across as someone who cares about the environment. personally as the environmentalists lie their back teeth out to try and win their point ,I have No time whatsoever for them. ( I recycle everything I can ) The Lucan interview may temper them a bit
Most of all it's nice just to be kept in touch, I think it has answered a few of the questions on the Angus site.
The survival of Angus all depends on Balcombe, Lucan is expecting a decision on planning by January at the latest.
If that doesn't go ahead. then expect ............... I'm not saying it. it starts with a "D"

Thanks Ja51. I knew someday You'd put somehting here I'd like. LoL
What a shame Lucan couldn't have said all this to his shareholders when he took n Angus, rather than we have to get it via a channel no one here cares for.
Good work Ja51

Didn't last long, Angus back to their useless PI coms.
Put on two questions 2 days ago and nothing on the board yet.
This is exactly why the SP is hovering just over a penny.
No One Trusts A Word Angus Have To Say.
It's my belief that, The answers will be full of lies anyway.

If another developement begins, Where will the money come from ?

Obviously nothing is going to happen this year, it's beyond anyones wildest dreams that it could make the Dec planning meeting as it's on the 3rd. As soon as we missed August submission that chance was gone.
We have nothing in the short term going for us and as the market doesn't like a lingerer. I thought I'd sell part of my holding.
No one wants them, not even Rupert Labrum, or Lucans wife. had to be in two lots and took an hour to sell . Not a good sign.
Still got loads left for the bottom drawer til next year.

YL. It's NOT a planning application for a greenfield site. It's only an extension of what has already been happening at Balcombe.

I think the planning application was constructed with the help of the planning department as much as it was permitted to help, this is why it took so long to prepare.
The work you suggest YL is already done and dusted.
It won't take 13 weeks.

http://www2.westsussex.gov.uk/ds/cttee/plng/PlanningLawGuide.pdf
6. Planning Applications Process
6.1 Pre-Application Discussions
For many applications, especially for larger potential projects, it is likely that there will
be some pre-application discussions between the allocated planning officer from the
County Council and the applicant. This is to establish the kind and depth of
information that will be required to enable the County Council to determine the
application properly.
Pre-application discussions are encouraged in the NPPF to facilitate and encourage
pre-application discussions: “Local planning authorities have a key role to play in
encouraging other parties to take maximum advantage of the pre-application stage…
they should encourage take-up of any pre-application services they do offer.”. They
help to establish the kind and depth of information that will be required to enable the
County Council to determine the application properly.
Any advice offered is subject to the qualification that it is without prejudice to the
ultimate decision on any application which may be made, particularly as no
consultation will have been undertaken. Officers will however be able to guide the
applicant as to the likely acceptability of the proposal.
6.2 Validation of Planning Applications
Once a planning application has been received and checked that it has included all
information required to determine the application (known as ‘validation’), it will be
formally registered and the publicity process will be started. The County Council will
send an acknowledgement to the applicant.
6.3 Timetable for Decision-Making
Once a planning application has been validated, the County Council should make a
decision on the proposal as quickly as possible, and in any event within the statutory
time limit unless a longer period is agreed in writing with the applicant.
The statutory time limits are:
? Where the development requires an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), the
time period for determination is extended to 16 weeks.
? For ‘major development’ (i.e. all minerals an waste development; other
development with a site area of more than 1ha or creating more than 1,000m2 of
additional floorspace): 13 weeks.
? For ‘minor’ development: 8 weeks

Rupert Labrum still buying ? Could be aiming for the magic 5% and then a boardroom shuffle as JTP did.
Might just start a boardroom buying spree to head him off.
We live in hope.

BigBear. " What about this ‘virgin’ pressure untapped reservoir at Lydsey."
Probably just another carrot to keep us mugs thinking there is something beyond the horizon.
I do hope they clear up a lot of unaswered questions, no doubt they have had hundreds fired at them over the last month which they have chosen to ignore, I firmly believe their website inbox is auto deleted a nano second afer it receives any messages.
I hope someone with record thie event. I'm unable to attend.
probably just as well, I'd likely end up with a sore bum when I land on the street after being ejected.
atb